[Touch-packages] [Bug 1853657] Re: librsvg 2.44.15 FTBFS in focal
** Changed in: librsvg (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to librsvg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853657 Title: librsvg 2.44.15 FTBFS in focal Status in librsvg package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: focal currently has rustc 1.38 (1.38.0+dfsg0.2+llvm-0ubuntu1), and librsvg 2.44.15 fails to build from source with this version. It built fine with rustc 1.37 (although there was a unit test failure on ppc64el, which prevented it from leaving focal-proposed, see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=942022). The upstream commit that addresses this is https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/librsvg/commit/de26c4d8. I backported it and added another patch to update the vendored crates in the source tarball accordingly, and the build succeeds again, but unit tests consistently fail, on all architectures. The upstream commit message says « Although you should rather be using the 2.46 branch of librsvg as 2.44 is EOL », so we should probably update librsvg in debian to 2.46 indeed. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librsvg/+bug/1853657/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1853657] Re: librsvg 2.44.15 FTBFS in focal
Ready for review and sponsoring in Debian: https://salsa.debian.org /gnome-team/librsvg/merge_requests/5 ** Changed in: librsvg (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to librsvg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853657 Title: librsvg 2.44.15 FTBFS in focal Status in librsvg package in Ubuntu: In Progress Bug description: focal currently has rustc 1.38 (1.38.0+dfsg0.2+llvm-0ubuntu1), and librsvg 2.44.15 fails to build from source with this version. It built fine with rustc 1.37 (although there was a unit test failure on ppc64el, which prevented it from leaving focal-proposed, see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=942022). The upstream commit that addresses this is https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/librsvg/commit/de26c4d8. I backported it and added another patch to update the vendored crates in the source tarball accordingly, and the build succeeds again, but unit tests consistently fail, on all architectures. The upstream commit message says « Although you should rather be using the 2.46 branch of librsvg as 2.44 is EOL », so we should probably update librsvg in debian to 2.46 indeed. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librsvg/+bug/1853657/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1853657] Re: librsvg 2.44.15 FTBFS in focal
The unit test failures are related to https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/librsvg/issues/511 and https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/librsvg/issues/512. A temporary workaround until upstream implements a clean way to skip the reftests is https://salsa.debian.org/gnome- team/librsvg/merge_requests/3. ** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/librsvg/issues #511 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/librsvg/issues/511 ** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/librsvg/issues #512 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/librsvg/issues/512 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to librsvg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853657 Title: librsvg 2.44.15 FTBFS in focal Status in librsvg package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: focal currently has rustc 1.38 (1.38.0+dfsg0.2+llvm-0ubuntu1), and librsvg 2.44.15 fails to build from source with this version. It built fine with rustc 1.37 (although there was a unit test failure on ppc64el, which prevented it from leaving focal-proposed, see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=942022). The upstream commit that addresses this is https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/librsvg/commit/de26c4d8. I backported it and added another patch to update the vendored crates in the source tarball accordingly, and the build succeeds again, but unit tests consistently fail, on all architectures. The upstream commit message says « Although you should rather be using the 2.46 branch of librsvg as 2.44 is EOL », so we should probably update librsvg in debian to 2.46 indeed. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librsvg/+bug/1853657/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1853657] Re: librsvg 2.44.15 FTBFS in focal
** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to librsvg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853657 Title: librsvg 2.44.15 FTBFS in focal Status in librsvg package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: focal currently has rustc 1.38 (1.38.0+dfsg0.2+llvm-0ubuntu1), and librsvg 2.44.15 fails to build from source with this version. It built fine with rustc 1.37 (although there was a unit test failure on ppc64el, which prevented it from leaving focal-proposed, see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=942022). The upstream commit that addresses this is https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/librsvg/commit/de26c4d8. I backported it and added another patch to update the vendored crates in the source tarball accordingly, and the build succeeds again, but unit tests consistently fail, on all architectures. The upstream commit message says « Although you should rather be using the 2.46 branch of librsvg as 2.44 is EOL », so we should probably update librsvg in debian to 2.46 indeed. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librsvg/+bug/1853657/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1853657] Re: librsvg 2.44.15 FTBFS in focal
Follow-up patch that updates the vendored crates in the source tarball accordingly. ** Patch added: "cssparser-update-vendored-crates.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librsvg/+bug/1853657/+attachment/5307180/+files/cssparser-update-vendored-crates.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to librsvg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853657 Title: librsvg 2.44.15 FTBFS in focal Status in librsvg package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: focal currently has rustc 1.38 (1.38.0+dfsg0.2+llvm-0ubuntu1), and librsvg 2.44.15 fails to build from source with this version. It built fine with rustc 1.37 (although there was a unit test failure on ppc64el, which prevented it from leaving focal-proposed, see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=942022). The upstream commit that addresses this is https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/librsvg/commit/de26c4d8. I backported it and added another patch to update the vendored crates in the source tarball accordingly, and the build succeeds again, but unit tests consistently fail, on all architectures. The upstream commit message says « Although you should rather be using the 2.46 branch of librsvg as 2.44 is EOL », so we should probably update librsvg in debian to 2.46 indeed. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librsvg/+bug/1853657/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1853657] Re: librsvg 2.44.15 FTBFS in focal
Build log with the above two patches applied, unit tests fail. ** Attachment added: "buildlog_ubuntu-focal-amd64.librsvg_2.44.15-1ubuntu1_ppa8_BUILDING.txt.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librsvg/+bug/1853657/+attachment/5307181/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-focal-amd64.librsvg_2.44.15-1ubuntu1_ppa8_BUILDING.txt.gz ** Changed in: librsvg (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Olivier Tilloy (osomon) ** Changed in: librsvg (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: librsvg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to librsvg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853657 Title: librsvg 2.44.15 FTBFS in focal Status in librsvg package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: focal currently has rustc 1.38 (1.38.0+dfsg0.2+llvm-0ubuntu1), and librsvg 2.44.15 fails to build from source with this version. It built fine with rustc 1.37 (although there was a unit test failure on ppc64el, which prevented it from leaving focal-proposed, see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=942022). The upstream commit that addresses this is https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/librsvg/commit/de26c4d8. I backported it and added another patch to update the vendored crates in the source tarball accordingly, and the build succeeds again, but unit tests consistently fail, on all architectures. The upstream commit message says « Although you should rather be using the 2.46 branch of librsvg as 2.44 is EOL », so we should probably update librsvg in debian to 2.46 indeed. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librsvg/+bug/1853657/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1853657] Re: librsvg 2.44.15 FTBFS in focal
Patch for the upstream commit (https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/librsvg/commit/de26c4d8). ** Patch added: "upstream-de26c4d8.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librsvg/+bug/1853657/+attachment/5307179/+files/upstream-de26c4d8.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to librsvg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853657 Title: librsvg 2.44.15 FTBFS in focal Status in librsvg package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: focal currently has rustc 1.38 (1.38.0+dfsg0.2+llvm-0ubuntu1), and librsvg 2.44.15 fails to build from source with this version. It built fine with rustc 1.37 (although there was a unit test failure on ppc64el, which prevented it from leaving focal-proposed, see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=942022). The upstream commit that addresses this is https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/librsvg/commit/de26c4d8. I backported it and added another patch to update the vendored crates in the source tarball accordingly, and the build succeeds again, but unit tests consistently fail, on all architectures. The upstream commit message says « Although you should rather be using the 2.46 branch of librsvg as 2.44 is EOL », so we should probably update librsvg in debian to 2.46 indeed. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librsvg/+bug/1853657/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
