Re: [translate-pootle] Still problems committing with git
Quoting Lars Kruse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): I think these are very valid comments. This whole conversation is about a bug anyway, and git is (as you mention) previously unsupported. If the code to support older git versions is available, we obviously use it, but I'm not too concerned about halting anything just to support all versions. I agree. Thus I will add a module for git1.5.2 within the next days. I hope, that it will work for git 1.4.x, too. If it does not work for git 1.4.x, then we will just ignore this issue until people report real demand, I guess. All this seems fair. As Miklos pointed and when it comes at Debian, using a recent Pootle version needs to install either a backported package or a package from Debian lenny (which is what we do on i18n.debian.net). So, having to install a backported git is not that a big deal. In short, if supporting git versions prior to 1.5 was possible, it would be good. If that's complicated and involve losing valuable developer time, it's not worth it. Actually, people building Pootle production servers with Debian should indeed use Etch plus Pootle from testing and git from www.backports.org - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Translate-pootle mailing list Translate-pootle@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/translate-pootle
Re: [translate-pootle] Still problems committing with git
Quoting Lars Kruse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): C) - applying Miklos patches to the current git support - ignoring incompatibility with git=1.5.2 Personally I would prefer (A) over (B) due to the cleaner code (in the long-term). But of course, I would not mind (B), too. The current version of git in debian stable seems to imply that (C) is not a good option for us, or? We worked this around by using a more recent version of git, for sure. But, if there's any way to support older versions, it would certainly be better as you will at some moment definitely find someone who prefers sticking with supported version of packages and software on their distro. So, if it is possible to support git versions below 1.5.2, it would get my own vote. - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Translate-pootle mailing list Translate-pootle@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/translate-pootle
Re: [translate-pootle] Still problems committing with git
Quoting F Wolff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): From Christians' feedback, I understand that things are well tested, and that we are happy with this working. (I haven't tested this yet.) s/well tested/tested :-) We don't have anything in prodcution yet (but I now really work on this, for translations related to the Debian Installer--you can for instance begin some work on Afrikaans translation of D-I in Pootle if you would like to help...:-)) So, as all this is not used in prodcution, I can't tell this is well tested. - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Translate-pootle mailing list Translate-pootle@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/translate-pootle
Re: [translate-pootle] Still problems committing with git
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 02:36:34AM +0200, Lars Kruse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1) the current implementation does not work without the --work-tree parameter (e.g. with the two patches that were sent by Miklos (30.6.2008)) 2) git v1.5.3 (or higher) behaves as expected - it is specified/documented to need both --git-dir and --work-tree for any operation outside of the current directory 3) for git v1.5.2 (and before) we have to change to the (base of the?) local git repository before executing git Right. the work-tree/git-dir switches allow out-of-tree git commands which I did not need when I initially did Git support, and unfortunately I forgot about them. C) - applying Miklos patches to the current git support - ignoring incompatibility with git=1.5.2 I think the situation where compabitility with git=1.5.2 makes sense is Debian stable. It has Pootle 0.10.1. It just does not have Git support. If a sysadmin decides to install newer a never (it was called unofficial) version of Pootle, then I think it is not that hard to install a newer version of Git as well. I think if we want to support Debian stable, then we have to support 1.4.4.4, since that's the official version Debian comes with. There are major changes between 1.4.x and 1.5.x, and - to be honest - I'm not too motivated to write code for 1.5.x. So I would vote for C). Just my two cents. pgpmyXzRn776n.pgp Description: PGP signature - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08___ Translate-pootle mailing list Translate-pootle@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/translate-pootle
Re: [translate-pootle] Still problems committing with git
On Wo, 2008-07-02 at 23:18 +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote: On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 02:36:34AM +0200, Lars Kruse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... C) - applying Miklos patches to the current git support - ignoring incompatibility with git=1.5.2 I think the situation where compabitility with git=1.5.2 makes sense is Debian stable. It has Pootle 0.10.1. It just does not have Git support. If a sysadmin decides to install newer a never (it was called unofficial) version of Pootle, then I think it is not that hard to install a newer version of Git as well. I think if we want to support Debian stable, then we have to support 1.4.4.4, since that's the official version Debian comes with. There are major changes between 1.4.x and 1.5.x, and - to be honest - I'm not too motivated to write code for 1.5.x. So I would vote for C). Just my two cents. I think these are very valid comments. This whole conversation is about a bug anyway, and git is (as you mention) previously unsupported. If the code to support older git versions is available, we obviously use it, but I'm not too concerned about halting anything just to support all versions. Friedel - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Translate-pootle mailing list Translate-pootle@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/translate-pootle
Re: [translate-pootle] Still problems committing with git
Hi, I just committed Miklos' patches for the git module as r7710. This should fix problems with git v1.5.3 (or higher). (I did it, since I did not notice any objections ...) I think if we want to support Debian stable, then we have to support 1.4.4.4, since that's the official version Debian comes with. There are major changes between 1.4.x and 1.5.x, and - to be honest - I'm not too motivated to write code for 1.5.x. So I would vote for C). Just my two cents. I think these are very valid comments. This whole conversation is about a bug anyway, and git is (as you mention) previously unsupported. If the code to support older git versions is available, we obviously use it, but I'm not too concerned about halting anything just to support all versions. I agree. Thus I will add a module for git1.5.2 within the next days. I hope, that it will work for git 1.4.x, too. If it does not work for git 1.4.x, then we will just ignore this issue until people report real demand, I guess. Lars - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Translate-pootle mailing list Translate-pootle@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/translate-pootle
Re: [translate-pootle] Still problems committing with git
On Do, 2008-07-03 at 01:56 +0200, Lars Kruse wrote: Hi, I just committed Miklos' patches for the git module as r7710. This should fix problems with git v1.5.3 (or higher). (I did it, since I did not notice any objections ...) Perfect! Thank you everybody for helping out to solve and test this. Friedel - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Translate-pootle mailing list Translate-pootle@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/translate-pootle
Re: [translate-pootle] Still problems committing with git
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:35:13PM +0200, Miklos Vajna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: here is a patch, on top of my previous one. Friedel, if you could review/commit these 2 patches, I would appreciate it. I think they are definitely useful not only for Debian but for anybody who use po files outside the Pootle directory (we at Frugalware do not use external po files, that's why I haven't hit this bug yet). Thanks. pgpsx7iiSoMmP.pgp Description: PGP signature - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08___ Translate-pootle mailing list Translate-pootle@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/translate-pootle
Re: [translate-pootle] Still problems committing with git
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 09:03:37PM +0200, Wynand Winterbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Miklos, I'll also review your changes tomorrow and try to check them in as soon as I can. If Friedel is slow to respond, it's because he's at a conference this week :). Oh, OK, I was not about to hurry you, just wanted to point out these patches were not meant to specific to the Debian guys. :-) pgpztyATXdC8u.pgp Description: PGP signature - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08___ Translate-pootle mailing list Translate-pootle@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/translate-pootle
Re: [translate-pootle] Still problems committing with git
Hi, Does this solve bug 347 properly? (Do we now support the older versions of git?) I would just like to document this properly. Unfortunately no: $ ~/git/git/git --git-dir git/setup/.git --work-tree git/setup add HACKING Unknown option: --work-tree $ ~/git/git/git --version git version 1.5.2 for 1.5.3 you still need to manually chdir() to the repo, perform the operation and then chdir() back. And that's already done by http://bugs.locamotion.org/attachment.cgi?id=125action=view ;-) I am not sure, if I get the complete picture of the state of the git support. Please correct me, if I am wrong about something: 1) the current implementation does not work without the --work-tree parameter (e.g. with the two patches that were sent by Miklos (30.6.2008)) 2) git v1.5.3 (or higher) behaves as expected - it is specified/documented to need both --git-dir and --work-tree for any operation outside of the current directory 3) for git v1.5.2 (and before) we have to change to the (base of the?) local git repository before executing git If these three assumptions are valid, then I would see the following alternative solutions: A) - applying Miklos patches to the current git support - adding a second module for git support (e.g. git-1.5.2.py) that would include the ugly os.chdir workarounds. We have to keep both in sync until we will finally remove support for git=1.5.2. The current module for the Lucene indexing engine is splitted in a similar way, so I don't see problems in implementing this. B) - adding the os.chdir workaround to the current git interface and removing all occourences of --git-dir and --work-tree. C) - applying Miklos patches to the current git support - ignoring incompatibility with git=1.5.2 Personally I would prefer (A) over (B) due to the cleaner code (in the long-term). But of course, I would not mind (B), too. The current version of git in debian stable seems to imply that (C) is not a good option for us, or? Any opinions? Lars - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Translate-pootle mailing list Translate-pootle@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/translate-pootle
Re: [translate-pootle] Still problems committing with git
On Wo, 2008-07-02 at 02:36 +0200, Lars Kruse wrote: Hi, Does this solve bug 347 properly? (Do we now support the older versions of git?) I would just like to document this properly. Unfortunately no: $ ~/git/git/git --git-dir git/setup/.git --work-tree git/setup add HACKING Unknown option: --work-tree $ ~/git/git/git --version git version 1.5.2 for 1.5.3 you still need to manually chdir() to the repo, perform the operation and then chdir() back. And that's already done by http://bugs.locamotion.org/attachment.cgi?id=125action=view ;-) I am not sure, if I get the complete picture of the state of the git support. Please correct me, if I am wrong about something: 1) the current implementation does not work without the --work-tree parameter (e.g. with the two patches that were sent by Miklos (30.6.2008)) 2) git v1.5.3 (or higher) behaves as expected - it is specified/documented to need both --git-dir and --work-tree for any operation outside of the current directory 3) for git v1.5.2 (and before) we have to change to the (base of the?) local git repository before executing git If these three assumptions are valid, then I would see the following alternative solutions: A) - applying Miklos patches to the current git support - adding a second module for git support (e.g. git-1.5.2.py) that would include the ugly os.chdir workarounds. We have to keep both in sync until we will finally remove support for git=1.5.2. The current module for the Lucene indexing engine is splitted in a similar way, so I don't see problems in implementing this. B) - adding the os.chdir workaround to the current git interface and removing all occourences of --git-dir and --work-tree. C) - applying Miklos patches to the current git support - ignoring incompatibility with git=1.5.2 Personally I would prefer (A) over (B) due to the cleaner code (in the long-term). But of course, I would not mind (B), too. The current version of git in debian stable seems to imply that (C) is not a good option for us, or? Any opinions? Lars Well, how far is the next Debian stable away? I would prefer A as well if somebody is willing to do the work. Friedel - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Translate-pootle mailing list Translate-pootle@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/translate-pootle
Re: [translate-pootle] Still problems committing with git
Quoting Miklos Vajna ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 05:51:34PM +0200, Miklos Vajna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll send a patch to correct this later tonight. Could you try this one, please? As soon as possible, sure. - Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php ___ Translate-pootle mailing list Translate-pootle@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/translate-pootle
Re: [translate-pootle] Still problems committing with git
Quoting Miklos Vajna ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 09:08:27AM +0200, Christian Perrier [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
The failure message changed..:-)
[GIT] commit of ('/var/lib/pootle/di/level2/tasksel', 'debian/po/fr.po')
failed:
Heh. Are you sure there were actually changes to commit?
I guess the problem is that commit failed because there were no changes
to commit, and in this case the stderr is empty.
Yes, you're right, my mistake.
I was thinking I still had pending changes but I actually had zapped
the git cloned tree and recloned it. So nothing was left to commit
If this is the case, I'm not exactly sure what would be the right
solution, maybe check if stderr is empty and if yes, dump stdout instead
stderr in the error message?
That would be better as, currently, trying to commit when nothing is
pending is indeed triggering erros like:
[GIT] commit of ('/var/lib/pootle/di/level2/tasksel', 'debian/po/fr.po')
failed:
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
___
Translate-pootle mailing list
Translate-pootle@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/translate-pootle
Re: [translate-pootle] Still problems committing with git
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 02:39:52PM +0200, Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Trace:
2008-06-29 13:58:19: Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Pootle/users.py, line 259, in handle
page = self.getpage(pathwords, session, argdict)
File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Pootle/pootle.py, line 523, in
getpage
return indexpage.ProjectIndex(project, session, argdict, dirfilter)
File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Pootle/indexpage.py, line 321, in
__init__
self.handleactions()
File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Pootle/indexpage.py, line 443, in
handleactions
self.project.commitpofile(self.session, self.dirname, commitfile)
File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Pootle/projects.py, line 599, in
commitpofile
versioncontrol.commitfile(pathname, message=Commit from %s by user %s.
%s %
File
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/translate/storage/versioncontrol/__init__.py,
line 292, in commitfile
return get_versioned_object(filename).commit(message)
File
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/translate/storage/versioncontrol/git.py,
line 60, in commit
raise IOError([GIT] add of ('%s', '%s') failed: %s \
IOError: [GIT] add of ('/var/lib/pootle/di/level2/tasksel',
'debian/po/fr.po') failed: fatal: pathspec 'debian/po/fr.po' did not match
any files
Thanks.
The fix seem to be to use the --work-tree option as well:
Example:
$ git --git-dir git/test/.git add HACKING
fatal: pathspec 'HACKING' did not match any files
I think this is the current situation.
$ git --git-dir git/test/.git --work-tree git/test add HACKING
And this works fine.
I'll send a patch to correct this later tonight.
pgp9iV75zeEHZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php___
Translate-pootle mailing list
Translate-pootle@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/translate-pootle
