Re: [Trisquel-users] Re : Abrowser won't run Regexr
That's the first thing I did. It still didn't work.
Re: [Trisquel-users] ThinkPenguin has a new laptop
You should be fine on T7 if you just update your Linux. https://jxself.org/linux-libre/
[Trisquel-users] Trouble Getting Trisquel 8 to install in UEFI Mode
Hi, When trying to do this, the installer crshed at about the 45% point, in the second installation phase. Following the crash, I did "lablk", and got the output below. The crash report said somethign about grub-install script. How do I get this to work? What other info may help? Thanks, Dave H. trisquel@trisquel:~$ lsblk NAMEMAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT sda 8:00 298.1G 0 disk ├─sda18:10 512M 0 part /target/boot/efi ├─sda28:20 488M 0 part /target/boot └─sda38:30 297.1G 0 part ├─trisquel--vg-root 252:00 293.2G 0 lvm /target └─trisquel--vg-swap_1 252:10 3.9G 0 lvm [SWAP] sdb 8:16 1 7.5G 0 disk └─sdb18:17 1 7.5G 0 part /cdrom loop0 7:00 2G 1 loop /rofs trisquel@trisquel:~$
Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk 2.0 Last Touches
As always, thank you for you help, Supertramp. I do have the sourceforge link. What I'm looking for is somewhere for people to go to get a snapshot of what Uruk is, and what it provides. Maybe it is too soon, and after Beta there will be something official.
[Trisquel-users] Free-software-compatible oEmbed service for videos?
So, I have an account on Diaspora and I wanted to post a video to share with some family and friends. However, it seems that you can't upload videos directly there (which is fair enough, as it takes a lot of storage space). But, it seems that you can embed videos that have been uploaded to another video-hosting service that uses the oEmbed protocol, to allow the video to be embedded from there into Diaspora. The oEmbed Wikipedia article lists some services that offer oEmbed (which includes Facebook, YouTube, Vimeo). Does anyone know if any of the services listed are free-software/privacy respecting or, if not, if there are any other services that offer oEmbed that are?
Re: [Trisquel-users] little css snippet to make the trisquel forum somewhat responsive
Don't worry, your suggestions and solution is very much appreciated (I'm not a developer, but if I would be allowed to implement it, I would gladly do so). ;) Besides, I'll also see what I can do to also improve over it. ;) 2017-11-26T18:36:15+0100 shiret...@web.de wrote: > Of course this snippet does not provide a perfect responsive user > experience. There are a lot of things that could be improved, for > instance packing the navigation into a mobile menu and so on, but in > my view my solution is better than no solution at all. > But then again, you're free to add and improve as you wish. > > I'm afraid I can't take the effort to create a perfect responsive > layout for this website, so I thought I want to share at least what I > could achieve. >
Re: [Trisquel-users] little css snippet to make the trisquel forum somewhat responsive
Of course this snippet does not provide a perfect responsive user experience. There are a lot of things that could be improved, for instance packing the navigation into a mobile menu and so on, but in my view my solution is better than no solution at all. But then again, you're free to add and improve as you wish. I'm afraid I can't take the effort to create a perfect responsive layout for this website, so I thought I want to share at least what I could achieve.
Re: [Trisquel-users] Tele-*-gram
Telegram offers encryption, and the client is free software. Anybody can check if the encryption is done properly. If you send your data to another persons server, it's not under your control anymore, no matter what kind of software is running on this server (after all, you will never find out if they really say the truth). Now, it would be better if the server side was also free software, because it would be possible to set up our own servers and not be dependent anymore on telegram. However, just because they didn't provide as much as free software as we hoped for, we shouldn't blame the developers. They *did* develop free software and we should be thankful. We can't blame people for not releasing code for software that they never even released. It's not that the server software is proprietary in the very sense - afaik, it wasn't released at all.
Re: [Trisquel-users] Quantum kicks ass
Yeah I started fresh (I deleted the profile folder). I think uBlock came preinstalled on the version I got from AUR (on Hyperbola). I think the offending add-on is the color inverter - unfortunately the interface is unusable with inverted colors unlike Seamonkey. It takes a whole second to invert the colors after loading the page. On a netbook Abrowser 57 simply froze while installing add-ons. On a T60 it works OK (startup is fast but pages take 2 seconds longer than Seamonkey to load), but much slower than Seamonkey (and much less functional: no PulseAudio, no Mozplugger/mpv etc).
Re: [Trisquel-users] Writing a simple guide to Parabola for newbies
That's been my experience too. This community is very welcoming and I feel comfortable asking questions here.
[Trisquel-users] Tele-*-gram
Telegram is a surveillance engine. The software installed on their centralized machines is proprietary. Their games with R* government is just a sweet propaganda /just like in a *Zombieland*/ > Message: 12 > Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 10:40:16 +0100 (CET) > From: hd-sca...@users.sf.net > To: trisquel-users@listas.trisquel.info > Subject: [Trisquel-users] QtSOCKSengine, liberating the current > QtWebEngine,then integrating with the current TorSOCKS, to be > launched at summer 2018 > Message-ID: > > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes > > I am here proud to announce our independent web IDE, surely under GPL 3.0 to > prevent nonfree deps, to face with the Qt approach from the ??open > source?? communities. > But I dnt want us late to come with our own Qt-based web IDE, which we need > to start the developments by summer 2018, in my SourceForge profile I am here > > willing to invite some Parabola and Trisquel hackers working for our > honourable liberation project. > > Rolling here: https://sourceforge.net/p/qtsocksengine > Q4 ESR here: https://sourceforge.net/p/q4socksengine-esr > (ESR is Mozilla term to their extended supported releases for their Gecko > frontends, a synonym to our familiar LTS, long term support relaases for > operating systems) > > Our first few apps need to be: > IceFalkon: The proposed derived lightweight web browser rewritten over > QupZilla using this engine > IceGeorge: The proposed derived lightweight OSM frontend rewritten over > MarbleQt (no KDE deps) using this engine > IceGram: The proposed derived lightweight Telegram frontend rewritten over > official Telegram desktop using this engine > > >
Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk 2.0 Last Touches
Here you are, mate Mattress -> https://sourceforge.net/projects/urukos/files/2.0/Beta2/
Re: [Trisquel-users] Quantum kicks ass
Did you start fresh when you installed it? Also ublock should definitely not come preinstalled.. I recommend you purge your .mozilla folder in home and your mozilla cache in /home/.cache, start it up and install one addon at the time, so you can spot the one that is slowing it down for you. Quantum should be fast for you.
Re: [Trisquel-users] little css snippet to make the trisquel forum somewhat responsive
Hi, I just subscribed to the trisquel-devel mailing list, and I wonder
if this is better discussed there?
I mean, we could discuss it there too (so that we could have two places
of discussion).
On a side note, please notice that I'm not a developer, so don't count
my opinion as any serious...
Finally, having considered all that I just said: my experience with
setting "display" to "none" (or to smething that equally hides it) in
regards to accessibility leads me to consider hiding not ideal. However,
in this case I don't see a problem. Although I would try to set their
display style to something along the lines of "block", or something that
forces the things to appear on a line of their own.
For example, in the case of the #navbar, if people access the page and
the style rule applies, then other people who write things to reference
to "that link in the bar to the right", will have to remember that the
bar deosn't exist for visitors with smaller screens.
2017-11-26T14:23:51+0100 shiret...@web.de wrote:
> I wrote a little CSS snippet that makes the trisquel forum at least
> useable with tablets and smartphones.
> All the site-admins have to do is copy the snippet at the end of the
> css theme file and it should work.
> Here it is, feel free to modify or change at your wish:
>
> @media(max-width: 1024px){
> #navigation{
> display:none;
> }
> #main{
> margin-right: 0px;
> width: 100%
> }
>
> td.replies, td.created{
> display: none;
> }
>
> th.topic-replies, th.topic-created{
> display: none;
> }
> #page{
> width: 100%;
> min-width: 400px
> }
> }
>
--
- https://libreplanet.org/wiki/User:Adfeno
- Palestrante e consultor sobre /software/ livre (não confundir com
gratis).
- "WhatsApp"? Ele não é livre. Por favor, veja formas de se comunicar
instantaneamente comigo no endereço abaixo.
- Contato: https://libreplanet.org/wiki/User:Adfeno#vCard
- Arquivos comuns aceitos (apenas sem DRM): Corel Draw, Microsoft
Office, MP3, MP4, WMA, WMV.
- Arquivos comuns aceitos e enviados: CSV, GNU Dia, GNU Emacs Org, GNU
GIMP, Inkscape SVG, JPG, LibreOffice (padrão ODF), OGG, OPUS, PDF
(apenas sem DRM), PNG, TXT, WEBM.
Re: [Trisquel-users] little css snippet to make the trisquel forum somewhat responsive
Here is a little modification that makes the indentation very slight and
instead adds a subtile grey dotted border on the left to indicate that it's
actually for a reply (the indentation makes nested replies impossible to read
on tablets or smartphones).
@media(max-width: 1024px){
#navigation{
display:none;
}
#main{
margin-right: 0px;
width: 100%
}
td.replies, td.created{
display: none;
}
th.topic-replies, th.topic-created{
display: none;
}
#page{
width: 100%;
min-width: 400px
}
.indented{
margin-left: 3px;
border-left: dotted 5px rgba(0,0,0,0.2);
}
}
[Trisquel-users] little css snippet to make the trisquel forum somewhat responsive
I wrote a little CSS snippet that makes the trisquel forum at least useable
with tablets and smartphones.
All the site-admins have to do is copy the snippet at the end of the css
theme file and it should work.
Here it is, feel free to modify or change at your wish:
@media(max-width: 1024px){
#navigation{
display:none;
}
#main{
margin-right: 0px;
width: 100%
}
td.replies, td.created{
display: none;
}
th.topic-replies, th.topic-created{
display: none;
}
#page{
width: 100%;
min-width: 400px
}
}
Re: [Trisquel-users] Uruk 2.0 Last Touches
The Uruk Website is down it seems. Is there no other website?I want somewhere to direct friends to. Thanks.
[Trisquel-users] QtSOCKSengine, liberating the current QtWebEngine, then integrating with the current TorSOCKS, to be launched at summer 2018
I am here proud to announce our independent web IDE, surely under GPL 3.0 to prevent nonfree deps, to face with the Qt approach from the ‘‘open source’’ communities. But I dnt want us late to come with our own Qt-based web IDE, which we need to start the developments by summer 2018, in my SourceForge profile I am here willing to invite some Parabola and Trisquel hackers working for our honourable liberation project. Rolling here: https://sourceforge.net/p/qtsocksengine Q4 ESR here: https://sourceforge.net/p/q4socksengine-esr (ESR is Mozilla term to their extended supported releases for their Gecko frontends, a synonym to our familiar LTS, long term support relaases for operating systems) Our first few apps need to be: IceFalkon: The proposed derived lightweight web browser rewritten over QupZilla using this engine IceGeorge: The proposed derived lightweight OSM frontend rewritten over MarbleQt (no KDE deps) using this engine IceGram: The proposed derived lightweight Telegram frontend rewritten over official Telegram desktop using this engine
