Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
The safest thing is to not use a computer at all.
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
Being offline doesn't protect you from exploitation of back-doors. If you've got any mission critical data, the only way to be safe is to ensure your no non-free software EVER handles it unencrypted.
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
The best idea is using offline computer. No network — no problem.
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
And that your storage medium is encrypted. Who knows what back-doors can be found in HDD/SSD firmware?
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
Uh Banane? I think we should stop feeding the troll
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
Wikipedia? This site using non-free files. Fair use? DO NOT USE!
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delirium
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
It is your decision not to trust the FSF, but please note that 'Libreboot' did not attack the FSF. The project's leader (Leah Rowe) made accusations against the FSF, which have thus far not been supported either way. Furthermore, please note that the firings from the FSF had *absolutely nothing* to do with any part of Libreboot. Leah Rowe's friend was fired due to unknown events happening within the FSF, which almost certainly had anything to do with any GNU project. In addition, the Libreboot software, being free, will remain just as trustworthy as before (if not, then I'm sure we'll all know quickly- just like the Ubuntu/Amazon saga). It appears it may separate into two strains (Libreboot and GNU Libreboot), but this just means you can pick a side if that should so satisfy you. Otherwise, I suspect you may have trouble finding other free BIOS/UEFI implementations- especially if you're on x86.
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
Libreboot attack FSF. Not crack. Some people are (might be) fired from FSF. It is because Libreboot. I cannot now trust Libreboot. I need another free BIOS firmware.
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
Libreboot did not attack Trisquel. Why would you want to crack the FSF or Libreboot servers? How will that help free software?
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
The Trisquel project is attacked by Libreboot, yes? Which side is more right? 0. Libreboot. Attack FSF server. Lots of damage for free software. 1. FSF. Attack Libreboot server. 2. Do nothing.
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
English version needed.
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
What company are bad for now? FSF or Libreboot?
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
I'm not sure how much can be trusted. I already know that some of the events have been mischaracterized which already made me wonder what else might be but now I see that the story itself of who did what is also changing. Example: Originally Leah accused Rubén of supposedly taking sides with the alleged bully and Leah called for him to be removed from the FSF for that reason; see http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libreboot/2016-09/msg00053.html. Now she accuses him of "leaking" emails to the Executive Director. The story about who did what seems to be changing, which makes me question the storyteller even further.
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
Crack my own computer?
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
Who is my new enemy? FSF or Libreboot… or Internet?
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
Leaked. Not enough security, lamers!
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
Thank you 'stas730', Don't worry about ussual trisquel forum admins. I recommend you to use another free distro: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-distros.html See these for mor info about how they act: https://trisquel.info/en/search/node/libreboot https://libreboot.org/gnu/ "Ruben Rodriguez - system administrator - leaked private emails to John Sullivan, which lead to the employee being fired." :(
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
Of course a whitelist would be more effective. Or you could take North Korea's approach: don't allow access to the Internet at all. No one is going to choose to use a browser designed to restrict what websites you are allowed to visit, though.
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
> The computers are evil* because many people using non-free software I hope you already installed a coreboot/libreboot open/free software BIOS to your computer? You know, the default UEFI has plenty of security vulnerabilities, which could undermine your "VERY secret project" :P
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
If you trust only the certain websites, wouldn't it be easier to use a whitte list rather than black? You would be expanding your allowed sites list gradually. Less convenient, but much more secure because you can't just block everything bad - it is impossible! so block by default, and add "allow" as exception
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
Security through obscurity sucks, hopefully your "VERY secure system" will be fully transparent in the end
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
The number is 512 ! :) If yours is different, it is possible to solve this riddle in almost infinite number of ways, receiving the different results ;)
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
Assembly isn't that bad. However, I doubt stas730 would need it for his/her "secret project."
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
da fuq?
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
Don't forget about Go and Python!
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
> I must learn C, C++ and Assembler. Maybe, Qt. Then I will start developing my secret project. Jesus, assembly? Are you a masochist or what? > You cannot send PM now. I cannot trust people, so I will not publish any more information about secret project. It sounds like you have a sense of self-importance that probably isn't healthy. Your secret project isn't special, and your grasp of the technology required to realize such a project isn't very strong.
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
It is binary code, yes? I will try later because it's too late now.
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
> Disabling JavaScript, sending an empty user agent Sending an empty user agent would definitely make the fingerprinting easier. Disabling javascript on the contrary will make it much more difficult as your browser (provided it is a decent browser with decent settings) will suddenly send only the HTTP_ACCEPT Headers and the User Agent, along with your internal window screen resolution, if you accept cookies (which you should, for the session only) and if the donottrack header is enabled (leave it off, it will make you more trackable and it is a useless feature no ad-head is going to comply with)
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
I want to know if you are a serious people. Because you must be very good if you want do all this stuff. Try to solve this and give me the number hiding inside. ♥♥▼♥▼♥▼ ♥♥▼▼♥▼ ♥♥♥▼▼♥ ♥♥ ♥♥▼▼▼♥▼ ♥▼ ♥♥▼▼♥▼ ▼▼▼ ♥♥▼▼♥♥♥ ♥♥▼♥▼♥ ♥♥▼▼♥▼ ▼▼▼ ♥♥♥ ♥♥▼♥▼▼▼ ♥▼ ▼♥▼ ♥♥▼▼♥▼ ♥♥▼▼♥▼♥ ▼▼▼ ♥♥▼♥♥▼ ♥♥▼▼♥♥▼ ▼▼▼ ♥♥♥▼▼▼♥ ♥♥▼ ♥♥♥▼▼♥▼ ♥♥▼ ♥♥♥▼▼♥♥ ♥♥♥▼♥♥♥ ♥♥♥ ♥♥♥▼♥▼▼ ♥♥♥▼▼♥♥ ♥♥♥▼▼▼♥ ♥♥♥▼▼♥♥ ♥♥♥▼♥♥▼ ♥♥♥▼♥♥♥ ♥♥♥▼♥▼♥ ♥♥♥▼♥♥♥ ♥♥♥▼▼▼♥ ♥♥♥ ♥♥♥▼▼▼♥ ♥♥♥▼♥♥▼ ♥♥♥▼▼♥▼ ♥♥♥▼♥▼▼ ♥♥♥ ♥♥♥▼♥▼▼ ♥♥♥▼▼♥▼ ♥♥♥▼▼▼♥ ♥♥♥▼▼▼♥ ♥♥♥▼♥♥▼ ♥♥♥▼▼▼♥ ♥♥♥ ♥♥♥▼♥▼♥ ♥♥♥▼♥♥♥ ♥♥♥▼▼♥♥ ♥♥▼♥♥♥▼ ♥♥♥ ♥♥♥▼♥♥▼ ♥♥♥▼♥♥▼ ♥♥♥▼▼♥▼ ♥♥▼ ♥♥♥▼♥♥♥ ♥♥♥▼♥▼♥ ♥♥▼ ♥♥♥▼♥▼▼
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
This account is old. I'm not using this account now. I will not support all freeing projects anymore. The computers are evil* because many people using non-free software. I think, I will finish using latest non-free software after learning programming. I must learn C, C++ and Assembler. Maybe, Qt. Then I will start developing my secret project. You cannot send PM now. I cannot trust people, so I will not publish any more information about secret project. I can publish info about freeing project. Just ask me. *computers with non-free software
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
This is sort of off-topic (I agree with you completely), but: I am not sure whether Mangos contains proprietary code, but if not, it could still be a good piece of software. The Mana World server was originally based on such a kind of software used to host private MMO servers.
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
gnu.org is not free software, not least of all because it is not software. (you are correct, it is CC BY-ND)
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
> Hint: what will happens if Internet will be non-free? We will finish using Internet. Maybe we will use GNUnet? https://gnunet.org/ :)
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
I want to delete my email address (on proprietary hosting). You cannot send PM for me now.
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
We can block non-free websites using databases. Using "Report non-free website" button and just blocking popular non-free websites. What is gnu.org license? CC-BY-ND? Free software or not?
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
block nonfree websites? how do you plan to do this? if you mean librejs, you will be doing people a disservice because tor browser is designed to be anonymous - running arbitrary code (you can never check what the "free" sites are actually sending you) removes anonymity! "Hint: if non-free software > free software, we should not use a software at all… because free software can be destroyed by a non-free worm." - what does this even mean? it is really unlikely you will get malware if you take sufficient precautions. this seems like it will cause significatly more problems than it is designed to solve
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
duckduckgo can be used without javascript
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
I will include GNU addons. I will change default setting for maximal security. I will modify SafeBrowsing & make FreeBrowsing mod (with database. First websites to block: *google.com *github.com (but free mirror (readonly code access only) will be available) *nsa.gov (you must know why) *microsoft.com (too) *apple.com *dvdcca.org (or not to block?) nonfree.example.com (just for test) *.yandex.* yandex* *introversion.co.uk (and other sites with Introversion Software) *battle.net and *blizzard.com (too) *.gov (or not?) etc. I maybe will develop a secret project for fighting non-free software. It is secret, do not ask info (I can tell info after connecting my VERY secure system). Hint: what will happens if Internet will be non-free? We will finish using Internet.
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
I want to release TorFree Browser. - No DRM (if it is closed source, otherwise warning user "There is a DRM content.") - Maximal security by default (disabled JS, cookies, safebrowsing is enabled, but not Google, my own website). Images… disable or not? Fully disabling, not partially. - Windows 7 user agent… or "HIDDEN" or just not sending user agent if possible. - FREEDOM: blocking non-free content with safebrowsing - Anonymity - Based on Tor Browser Bundle - Compiler: GCC… stop. How GCC compiled if written on C? - TorFree CA. Or other gratis EV CA in Tor network.
Re: [Trisquel-users] DuckDuckGo? Change to YaCy.
> DuckDuckGo is non-free. YaCy is free Yes. We know. https://github.com/asciimoo/searx/wiki/Searx-instances > I will release my own browser soon (or not?). ?
