Re: [Trisquel-users] QupZilla-libre?
So, is that true which Gtk2 is being deprecated? GNOME has deprecated Gtk2 for years, but this is well criticized the Gtk+ backward compatibiltiies over Gtk2 are ‘‘worse than worst’’, this needs to be just why LXQt leaves Gtk+ and Bugdie needs to experiment in LXQt as to quit Gtk+. A number of people have felt which a number Gtk+ elements are ugly but they cant back to Gtk2, they have hence told the forums they are active, they need LXQt to fully quit Gtk+. But I need to tell them Deepin, Liri, Lumina also fit their needs that they are Qt only, if they are also in FreeBSD world Lumina should be their favourite desktop, KDE dsnt fit which it integrates Qt with Gtk+ and Gtk2. A nonfree Arch derivative, Chakra, if they need to discourage Gtk they instead need to endorse LXQt and Liri, but also to deprecate KDE, above has been why.
Re: [Trisquel-users] QupZilla-libre?
IKR? :(
Re: [Trisquel-users] QupZilla-libre?
You have people who use Fuckbook? That site's malicious, proprietary JavaScript is almost as bad as Facebook's.
Re: [Trisquel-users] QupZilla-libre?
No, the version of Qupzilla in the repo is still the version that uses QtWebKit; this is true even of Ubuntu 16.04. The engine switch was more recent. It's definitely insecure, though, because QtWebKit is insecure. Are we sure that there is actually proprietary software in this, though? I know that it's a common meme to say that Chromium is not entirely libre, but no one ever backs this claim up with evidence (by pointing to examples of non-libre files).
Re: [Trisquel-users] QupZilla-libre?
Xfce is transition, a looong one.
Re: [Trisquel-users] QupZilla-libre?
How ‘‘libre’’ this Falkon will be can’t be assessed? It is migrating QupZilla from a Qt-only platform into KDE, but KDE is not Qt only, instead needs to integrate between Qt and Gtk+/Gtk2, however by how much this matters? Basically, the "freeness" of Falkon/QupZilla cannot be assessed due to the magnitude of transitions with the project, but at first blush there doesn't seem to be any issues.
Re: [Trisquel-users] QupZilla-libre?
Yes I have heard QupZilla is integrating into KDE this summer, but not which KDE needs QupZilla to replace their aging Konqueror, though I of course know Konqueror was aging. Anyway I still dont see what QupZilla will be and related names in the KF5 or KDE5 flags of apps from my Parabola system. [hd_scania@hd-scania ~]$ pacman -Ss falkon [hd_scania@hd-scania ~]$ pacman -Ss Pepper Qt [hd_scania@hd-scania ~]$ pacman -Ss Pepper [hd_scania@hd-scania ~]$ Also KDE has a well known major con to be too resources occupying, which KDE needs to integrate Qt with the Gtk+ and Gtk2 apps, but LXQt, Deepin, Liri, Lumina are only focused on Qt which unlike KDE they dnt integrate Qt with other platforms. To be Qt only please instead use LXQt, Deepin, Liri, Lumina, to be Gtk+ only please use Xfce or GNOME, to be Gtk2 only please use MATE. By using KDE you must accept that fate your machine will be too lagged due to its bloat.
Re: [Trisquel-users] QupZilla-libre?
Your information seems out of date gd-scania Firstly, QupZilla is no more. The project has formally joined KDE and is now known as Falkon. The versions of Qupzilla in the repos are old and will be deprecated. Secondly, Flakon will not be using QtWebKit anymore as it has also been depreciated, Flakon (and the most current version of QupZilla) use Qt WebEngine instead. Flakon and QupZilla both carry GPL licenses and are free software. They are not forks Chromium as far as I know, they use Blink which also carries the GPL. I am not familiar with Pepper, but I know Debian packages it separately, so it would stand to reason that would be why it isn't included downstream to Trisquel if Ubuntu didn't bother to change it. Since it is a pretty niche app that seems likely. Basically, the "freeness" of Falkon/QupZilla cannot be assessed due to the magnitude of transitions with the project, but at first blush there doesn't seem to be any issues.
Re: [Trisquel-users] QupZilla-libre?
Flidas (i.e. T8) has liberated QupZilla by erasing these Google nonfree libraries (Google has licensed Chromium into MIT and MPL but not GPL, mis-tolerating Chromium to the nonfree deps), but Parabola has not updated QupZulla since this March, this is here I am requesting Parabola to follow this. SCJ6, smart Cangjie generation 6 IME, is always missing in Parabola. I have today invited few Fuckbook friends to Parabola and Trisquel to be their first few GNU systems, one hasnt priorly known what are free software, they are first of all GNU systems in PC like Parabola and Trisquel, and F-droid app centre in Androids. Once he feels Parabola and Trisquel nice I will also need him to quit nonfree Gplay for Androids like PC, plus if present he will be always needed to throw his iOS devices.
Re: [Trisquel-users] QupZilla-libre?
Do the versions of QupZilla in Trisquel and Parabola have these non-free components?
