Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] Graduate Apache Tuscany as a Top Level Project
Seems ok to me too. On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:36 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ant elder wrote: The current draft proposal is at: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Draft+TLP+Resolution Reviews and updates welcome. ...ant On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 5:04 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Turns out we're not quite ready yet. ...ant On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 5:03 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip I'm not happy that we would do this over something as important as the technical charter for the project. I think we need to formally vote as a project on the words we want to take forward to the IPMC. We should be able to restart the vote with this correction and have it complete in time to get the proposal to the board in time for the May board meeting. Ok I'll cancel this vote then. ...ant This version looks OK to me. Simon -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] Graduate Apache Tuscany as a Top Level Project
Last call, unless anyone says otherwise i'll be restarting this vote tomorrow morning using the contents of the wiki page: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Draft+TLP+Resolution ...ant On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Seems ok to me too. On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:36 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ant elder wrote: The current draft proposal is at: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Draft+TLP+Resolution Reviews and updates welcome. ...ant On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 5:04 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Turns out we're not quite ready yet. ...ant On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 5:03 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip I'm not happy that we would do this over something as important as the technical charter for the project. I think we need to formally vote as a project on the words we want to take forward to the IPMC. We should be able to restart the vote with this correction and have it complete in time to get the proposal to the board in time for the May board meeting. Ok I'll cancel this vote then. ...ant This version looks OK to me. Simon -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] Graduate Apache Tuscany as a Top Level Project
ant elder wrote: Last call, unless anyone says otherwise i'll be restarting this vote tomorrow morning using the contents of the wiki page: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Draft+TLP+Resolution ...ant OK by me, Ant Yours, Mike.
Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] Graduate Apache Tuscany as a Top Level Project
Looks good to me. +1 to restart the vote. Ignacio On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 8:49 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Last call, unless anyone says otherwise i'll be restarting this vote tomorrow morning using the contents of the wiki page: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Draft+TLP+Resolution ...ant On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Seems ok to me too. On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:36 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ant elder wrote: The current draft proposal is at: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Draft+TLP+Resolution Reviews and updates welcome. ...ant On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 5:04 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Turns out we're not quite ready yet. ...ant On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 5:03 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip I'm not happy that we would do this over something as important as the technical charter for the project. I think we need to formally vote as a project on the words we want to take forward to the IPMC. We should be able to restart the vote with this correction and have it complete in time to get the proposal to the board in time for the May board meeting. Ok I'll cancel this vote then. ...ant This version looks OK to me. Simon -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://people.apache.org/%7Elresendehttp://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] Graduate Apache Tuscany as a Top Level Project
Hi, When we reference SCA in the charter, should we use Service Component Architecture (SCA) instead? Thanks, Raymond -- From: ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 5:49 AM To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] Graduate Apache Tuscany as a Top Level Project Last call, unless anyone says otherwise i'll be restarting this vote tomorrow morning using the contents of the wiki page: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Draft+TLP+Resolution ...ant On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Seems ok to me too. On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:36 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ant elder wrote: The current draft proposal is at: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Draft+TLP+Resolution Reviews and updates welcome. ...ant On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 5:04 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Turns out we're not quite ready yet. ...ant On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 5:03 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip I'm not happy that we would do this over something as important as the technical charter for the project. I think we need to formally vote as a project on the words we want to take forward to the IPMC. We should be able to restart the vote with this correction and have it complete in time to get the proposal to the board in time for the May board meeting. Ok I'll cancel this vote then. ...ant This version looks OK to me. Simon -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] Graduate Apache Tuscany as a Top Level Project
Raymond Feng wrote: Hi, When we reference SCA in the charter, should we use Service Component Architecture (SCA) instead? The reference is to the SCA standard defined by the OASIS OpenCSA member section. This seems clear and unambiguous to me. However, I don't object to spelling it out in full if others want to do this. Simon Thanks, Raymond -- From: ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 5:49 AM To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] Graduate Apache Tuscany as a Top Level Project Last call, unless anyone says otherwise i'll be restarting this vote tomorrow morning using the contents of the wiki page: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Draft+TLP+Resolution ...ant On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Seems ok to me too. On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:36 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ant elder wrote: The current draft proposal is at: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Draft+TLP+Resolution Reviews and updates welcome. ...ant On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 5:04 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Turns out we're not quite ready yet. ...ant On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 5:03 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip I'm not happy that we would do this over something as important as the technical charter for the project. I think we need to formally vote as a project on the words we want to take forward to the IPMC. We should be able to restart the vote with this correction and have it complete in time to get the proposal to the board in time for the May board meeting. Ok I'll cancel this vote then. ...ant This version looks OK to me. Simon -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] Graduate Apache Tuscany as a Top Level Project
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, When we reference SCA in the charter, should we use Service Component Architecture (SCA) instead? Thanks, Raymond -- From: ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 5:49 AM To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] Graduate Apache Tuscany as a Top Level Project Last call, unless anyone says otherwise i'll be restarting this vote tomorrow morning using the contents of the wiki page: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Draft+TLP+Resolution ...ant On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Seems ok to me too. On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:36 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ant elder wrote: The current draft proposal is at: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Draft+TLP+Resolution Reviews and updates welcome. ...ant On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 5:04 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Turns out we're not quite ready yet. ...ant On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 5:03 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip I'm not happy that we would do this over something as important as the technical charter for the project. I think we need to formally vote as a project on the words we want to take forward to the IPMC. We should be able to restart the vote with this correction and have it complete in time to get the proposal to the board in time for the May board meeting. Ok I'll cancel this vote then. ...ant This version looks OK to me. Simon -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresendehttp://people.apache.org/%7Elresende http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ Hi Looks OK to me. I'd be happy if you made the change Raymond suggests. Simon
Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] Graduate Apache Tuscany as a Top Level Project
ant elder wrote: The current draft proposal is at: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Draft+TLP+Resolution Reviews and updates welcome. ...ant On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 5:04 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Turns out we're not quite ready yet. ...ant On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 5:03 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip I'm not happy that we would do this over something as important as the technical charter for the project. I think we need to formally vote as a project on the words we want to take forward to the IPMC. We should be able to restart the vote with this correction and have it complete in time to get the proposal to the board in time for the May board meeting. Ok I'll cancel this vote then. ...ant This version looks OK to me. Simon
