Re: parent pom and incubator references
Sounds good to me. Kelvin. 2008/6/3 ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 2:24 PM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > As mentioned elsewhere on this list in the discussion about respinning > the > > SDO 1.1.1 RC, I'm hoping to drop the "incubating" tag in the release > name. > > > > This has led me to look at the parent pom, and I guess we need a new > > version of parent pom that doesn't reference the incubator repo, and > then > > open a vote on that. I may be opening a whole new kettle of Pandora's > > worms > > that would have been best left unopened for a point release. On the other > > hand I guess it needs doing some time soon. Digging around a few other > top > > level projects, and seeing the comments in our own parent pom, it would > > appear I might be able to just drop the "apache.incubator" repository > > stanza > > in a new revision of the parent pom. Is that true? any guidance would > be > > very welcome. > > > > Kelvin. > > > > How about removing the reference to the Tuscany parent pom and just > defining > whatever is required in the top level SDO pom.xml. We talked about doing > this once before - http://apache.markmail.org/message/2woxtw7lfalm3rtx. > The > only concern was if it caused trouble if building all the subprojects under > tuscany/java together, but does anyone ever do that these days? > > ...ant >
Re: parent pom and incubator references
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 2:24 PM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As mentioned elsewhere on this list in the discussion about respinning the > SDO 1.1.1 RC, I'm hoping to drop the "incubating" tag in the release name. > > This has led me to look at the parent pom, and I guess we need a new > version of parent pom that doesn't reference the incubator repo, and then > open a vote on that. I may be opening a whole new kettle of Pandora's > worms > that would have been best left unopened for a point release. On the other > hand I guess it needs doing some time soon. Digging around a few other top > level projects, and seeing the comments in our own parent pom, it would > appear I might be able to just drop the "apache.incubator" repository > stanza > in a new revision of the parent pom. Is that true? any guidance would be > very welcome. > > Kelvin. > How about removing the reference to the Tuscany parent pom and just defining whatever is required in the top level SDO pom.xml. We talked about doing this once before - http://apache.markmail.org/message/2woxtw7lfalm3rtx. The only concern was if it caused trouble if building all the subprojects under tuscany/java together, but does anyone ever do that these days? ...ant
parent pom and incubator references
As mentioned elsewhere on this list in the discussion about respinning the SDO 1.1.1 RC, I'm hoping to drop the "incubating" tag in the release name. This has led me to look at the parent pom, and I guess we need a new version of parent pom that doesn't reference the incubator repo, and then open a vote on that. I may be opening a whole new kettle of Pandora's worms that would have been best left unopened for a point release. On the other hand I guess it needs doing some time soon. Digging around a few other top level projects, and seeing the comments in our own parent pom, it would appear I might be able to just drop the "apache.incubator" repository stanza in a new revision of the parent pom. Is that true? any guidance would be very welcome. Kelvin.
