[twitter-dev] Re: FW: Twitter is Suing me!!!

2009-08-12 Thread avail4one
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Scott Haneda talkli...@newgeo.com wrote:


 I am not a lawyer, but everything I have read about this makes the below
 impossible.  If you have a trademark on a name, you MUST protect it.
  Failure to protect it, results in loss of the mark.

 The quote below, clearly states that Twitter is not going to protect this
 mark.  That being the case, they will lose the mark, making the filing and
 costs associated with it a complete waste.


yeah me no atty neither. lol. wonder what they put for 'mark first used in
commerce' - maybe in the future? ;-)


-- 
\./'\./ /'\ \ ]. /'\./'\ /'\ /'\./


[twitter-dev] Re: Quick poll: Can anyone do anything on twitter.com?

2009-08-09 Thread avail4one
Did you try Internet Explorer?



On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 12:22 AM, dean.j.robinson
dean.j.robin...@gmail.comwrote:


 99.9% of login attempts simply don't work at all in Firefox 3.5, they
 just redirects to blank https://twitter.com/sessions page
 If by some fluke it does actually login I can't logout to change
 accounts.

 Logins work in Safari, but posting statuses only does occasionally,
 I've tried to update a profile picture earlier, selected my image, hit
 save... waited... nothing... came back and hour later and the page was
 still trying to load.

 Logouts won't work in safari either. Safari can’t open the page
 “https://twitter.com/logout” because the server unexpectedly dropped
 the connection. This sometimes occurs when the server is busy. Wait
 for a few minutes, and then try again. - I've been trying since
 thursday.

 paging works... sometimes
 search works... sometimes

 My oauth app was working fine until I wanted to logout and change
 users... now I can't reauthorize/relogin

 @$%$ those morons who thought it was a good idea to attack that one
 random dude in Georgia cause this whole mess.




-- 
\./'\./ /'\ \ ]. /'\./'\ /'\ /'\./


[twitter-dev] Re: Twitter API is unresponsive, can we crawl the twitter.com website?

2009-08-09 Thread avail4one
I think it's ok to go for it, what does everyone else think?



On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Tim Haines tmhai...@gmail.com wrote:


 Hi there,

 This is probably a very dumb question, but I thought I'd ask it
 anyway.

 I run http://favstar.fm, and I can't call the API more than 60 or so
 times an hour at the moment (or something in that region).  My worthy
 competitor http://favotter.matope.com remains uneffected though, and
 has been able to continue his fav crawling uninterrupted.

 Would it be okay to start taking a peek at some of the more popular
 user's pages on twitter.com, and crawl their favorites from there
 rather than using the api?  I guess this assumes my IP wouldn't get
 blocked as it seems to be by the API.

 Dumb question right?  Curious to hear.

 Tim.





-- 
\./'\./ /'\ \ ]. /'\./'\ /'\ /'\./


[twitter-dev] Re: Twitter API is unresponsive, can we crawl the twitter.com website?

2009-08-09 Thread avail4one
hmmm, maybe. i honestly wasn't trying to suggest a 'bad idea' was actually
good, but i was just reading through recent messages, trying to make some
sense out of it all, and realized that I first heard of twitter pretty early
on a radio broadcast. that was mostly an advertisement. twitter was still a
baby. I was an early adopter. I created my account right away just to see
how great it was.

anyhow, it just occurred to me the question of why we are talking about this
on this old-fashion google thing and not twitter... and i think the answer
is this: it's a numbers game. and it has always been. and of course this
makes no sense whatsoever, it's not suppose to. that's exactly what that
kind of response means.

just a thought.












On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Abraham Williams 4bra...@gmail.com wrote:

 I'm going to say it is a good way to get your app/IP permanently banned
 from Twitter.

 Abraham

 2009/8/9 avail4one avail4...@gmail.com

 I think it's ok to go for it, what does everyone else think?




 On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Tim Haines tmhai...@gmail.com wrote:


 Hi there,

 This is probably a very dumb question, but I thought I'd ask it
 anyway.

 I run http://favstar.fm, and I can't call the API more than 60 or so
 times an hour at the moment (or something in that region).  My worthy
 competitor http://favotter.matope.com remains uneffected though, and
 has been able to continue his fav crawling uninterrupted.

 Would it be okay to start taking a peek at some of the more popular
 user's pages on twitter.com, and crawl their favorites from there
 rather than using the api?  I guess this assumes my IP wouldn't get
 blocked as it seems to be by the API.

 Dumb question right?  Curious to hear.

 Tim.





 --
 \./'\./ /'\ \ ]. /'\./'\ /'\ /'\./




 --
 Abraham Williams | Community Evangelist | http://web608.org
 Hacker | http://abrah.am | http://twitter.com/abraham
 Project | http://fireeagle.labs.poseurtech.com
 This email is: [ ] blogable [x] ask first [ ] private.




-- 
\./'\./ /'\ \ ]. /'\./'\ /'\ /'\./


[twitter-dev] Re: Filter Profanity

2009-07-17 Thread avail4one
hmmm you wanna dump random content your robot found on the internet on kids
and hope your stuff doesn't scare the crap out of grandma?

it would probably be just as interesting and profitable to block human
visitors and instead use random roboreader bots. then it would be
totally-fully-automated.

$Id: roboreader.html,v 1.24 2008/01/06 12:31:07 whistlek Exp whistlek $

This robot will read a web page at a specified URL, registering one unique
visitor to your web site.

command line options:
--- r  follow links and read entire site recursively
--- w X   wait X seconds pretending to read the page before following any
links
--- x randomize wait to make it seem more like it's a real human
--- z X send output to alternative directory X (instead of /dev/null, the
default. useful if you are already sending your mail to /dev/null and don't
want to cross the streams)
--- G randomly click on moomle ads.

@twitshawnna: Holy Jesus Christ, you should have seen the amazing creampie
my husband gave me last night.
@twatmarie: oh yeah, i bet he thanks the lord every night that you got that
new job as a fluffer.








On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:27 PM, ferodynamics duch...@solve360.com wrote:



  No, you have to do this client side. Also, cussbusting is pretty fricking
  hard.
 
  --
   personal:
 http://www.cameronkaiser.com/--
Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems *www.floodgap.com*
 ckai...@floodgap.com
  -- The only thing to fear is fearlessness -- R. E. M.
 -

 And they find all kinds of unpredictable variations, for whatever
 reason, even if it's just because they can't spell.  If you find
 someone offensive, potentially offensive, unfollow them.




-- 
\./'\./ /'\ \ ]. /'\./'\ /'\ /'\./