Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] MTD: atmel_nand: support for software BCH ECC

2013-09-05 Thread Andreas Bießmann
Dear Scott Wood,

On 04.09.13 21:44, Scott Wood wrote:
 On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 17:15 +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
 On 09/04/2013 02:46 PM, Bo Shen wrote:
 On 9/4/2013 8:30 PM, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
 Yes, we need libbch.

 If we really want to enable software BCH support. It also need add
 following two options in board configuration file.
 ---8---
 #define CONFIG_NAND_ECC_BCH
 #define CONFIG_BCH
 ---8---

 So, this patch give us option to enable software BCH.
 got it. So the NAND_ECC_BCH is the adoption for the SW BCH correction in
 mtd layer. I understand that this would be helpful for at91 SoC without
 PMECC HW. But there is no user currently, so I hesitate to apply this.

 Frankly, there is no EK boards from Atmel use software BCH now, however,
 a lot of customers use NAND with 224 bytes OOB, can not use software
 ECC, they need use software BCH.

 I understand this. But it will be a piece of dead code until a user of
 it would be submitted.

 So, I think it is better to apply this patch. If it will break the rule
 of u-boot, then I think we can wait real user in u-boot need this and
 then apply this patch.

 I'd like to hear Scott's comment on that.
 
 Is this for the benefit of out-of-tree boards, or for boards which will
 be submitted but haven't yet?
 
 In the latter case, it could be submitted at the same time.  In the
 former case, of course we encourage the boards to be submitted, and we
 don't generally add code solely for the benefit of out-of-tree boards.  
 
 In any case, this is minor enough that I don't care all that much.  If
 we ever get kconfig, then hopefully the dead code rules will relax to
 code which could be enabled through some legal config, rather than code
 which is enabled in some default config for a board.  Things like
 allyesconfig and randconfig could help with build test coverage.

I think this is a 'yes we take it'. Scott, would you pull it in or
should I do? Is it even that minor to pull it into 2013.10? It was
posted weeks after merge window closed.

Best regards

Andreas Bießmann
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] MTD: atmel_nand: support for software BCH ECC

2013-09-05 Thread Scott Wood
On Thu, 2013-09-05 at 08:28 +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
 Dear Scott Wood,
 
 On 04.09.13 21:44, Scott Wood wrote:
  On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 17:15 +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
  On 09/04/2013 02:46 PM, Bo Shen wrote:
  On 9/4/2013 8:30 PM, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
  Yes, we need libbch.
 
  If we really want to enable software BCH support. It also need add
  following two options in board configuration file.
  ---8---
  #define CONFIG_NAND_ECC_BCH
  #define CONFIG_BCH
  ---8---
 
  So, this patch give us option to enable software BCH.
  got it. So the NAND_ECC_BCH is the adoption for the SW BCH correction in
  mtd layer. I understand that this would be helpful for at91 SoC without
  PMECC HW. But there is no user currently, so I hesitate to apply this.
 
  Frankly, there is no EK boards from Atmel use software BCH now, however,
  a lot of customers use NAND with 224 bytes OOB, can not use software
  ECC, they need use software BCH.
 
  I understand this. But it will be a piece of dead code until a user of
  it would be submitted.
 
  So, I think it is better to apply this patch. If it will break the rule
  of u-boot, then I think we can wait real user in u-boot need this and
  then apply this patch.
 
  I'd like to hear Scott's comment on that.
  
  Is this for the benefit of out-of-tree boards, or for boards which will
  be submitted but haven't yet?
  
  In the latter case, it could be submitted at the same time.  In the
  former case, of course we encourage the boards to be submitted, and we
  don't generally add code solely for the benefit of out-of-tree boards.  
  
  In any case, this is minor enough that I don't care all that much.  If
  we ever get kconfig, then hopefully the dead code rules will relax to
  code which could be enabled through some legal config, rather than code
  which is enabled in some default config for a board.  Things like
  allyesconfig and randconfig could help with build test coverage.
 
 I think this is a 'yes we take it'. Scott, would you pull it in or
 should I do? Is it even that minor to pull it into 2013.10? It was
 posted weeks after merge window closed.

I can take it, but not for 2013.10.  It's not a bugfix.

-Scott



___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] MTD: atmel_nand: support for software BCH ECC

2013-09-04 Thread Andreas Bießmann
Hi Bo,

On 08/28/2013 04:54 PM, Bo Shen wrote:
 Add possible to use software BCH ECC for atmel nand driver
 
 Signed-off-by: Bo Shen voice.s...@gmail.com
 
 ---
  drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c |4 
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
 
 diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
 index 96aca00..52efbee 100644
 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
 +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
 @@ -1177,7 +1177,11 @@ int atmel_nand_chip_init(int devnum, ulong base_addr)
   mtd-priv = nand;
   nand-IO_ADDR_R = nand-IO_ADDR_W = (void  __iomem *)base_addr;
  
 +#ifdef CONFIG_NAND_ECC_BCH
 + nand-ecc.mode = NAND_ECC_SOFT_BCH;
 +#else
   nand-ecc.mode = NAND_ECC_SOFT;
 +#endif

I don't think this is enough for sw supported bch. Where do you feed the
libbch?

Best regards

Andreas Bießmann
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] MTD: atmel_nand: support for software BCH ECC

2013-09-04 Thread Bo Shen

Hi Andreas,

On 9/4/2013 6:23 PM, Andreas Bießmann wrote:

Hi Bo,

On 08/28/2013 04:54 PM, Bo Shen wrote:

Add possible to use software BCH ECC for atmel nand driver

Signed-off-by: Bo Shen voice.s...@gmail.com

---
  drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c |4 
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
index 96aca00..52efbee 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
@@ -1177,7 +1177,11 @@ int atmel_nand_chip_init(int devnum, ulong base_addr)
mtd-priv = nand;
nand-IO_ADDR_R = nand-IO_ADDR_W = (void  __iomem *)base_addr;

+#ifdef CONFIG_NAND_ECC_BCH
+   nand-ecc.mode = NAND_ECC_SOFT_BCH;
+#else
nand-ecc.mode = NAND_ECC_SOFT;
+#endif


I don't think this is enough for sw supported bch. Where do you feed the
libbch?


Yes, we need libbch.

If we really want to enable software BCH support. It also need add 
following two options in board configuration file.

---8---
#define CONFIG_NAND_ECC_BCH
#define CONFIG_BCH
---8---

So, this patch give us option to enable software BCH.


Best regards

Andreas Bießmann



Best Regards,
Bo Shen
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] MTD: atmel_nand: support for software BCH ECC

2013-09-04 Thread Andreas Bießmann
Hi Bo,

On 09/04/2013 02:11 PM, Bo Shen wrote:
 Hi Andreas,
 
 On 9/4/2013 6:23 PM, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
 Hi Bo,

 On 08/28/2013 04:54 PM, Bo Shen wrote:
 Add possible to use software BCH ECC for atmel nand driver

 Signed-off-by: Bo Shen voice.s...@gmail.com

 ---
   drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c |4 
   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

 diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
 b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
 index 96aca00..52efbee 100644
 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
 +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
 @@ -1177,7 +1177,11 @@ int atmel_nand_chip_init(int devnum, ulong
 base_addr)
   mtd-priv = nand;
   nand-IO_ADDR_R = nand-IO_ADDR_W = (void  __iomem *)base_addr;

 +#ifdef CONFIG_NAND_ECC_BCH
 +nand-ecc.mode = NAND_ECC_SOFT_BCH;
 +#else
   nand-ecc.mode = NAND_ECC_SOFT;
 +#endif

 I don't think this is enough for sw supported bch. Where do you feed the
 libbch?
 
 Yes, we need libbch.
 
 If we really want to enable software BCH support. It also need add
 following two options in board configuration file.
 ---8---
 #define CONFIG_NAND_ECC_BCH
 #define CONFIG_BCH
 ---8---
 
 So, this patch give us option to enable software BCH.

got it. So the NAND_ECC_BCH is the adoption for the SW BCH correction in
mtd layer. I understand that this would be helpful for at91 SoC without
PMECC HW. But there is no user currently, so I hesitate to apply this.

Best regards

Andreas Bießmann

___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] MTD: atmel_nand: support for software BCH ECC

2013-09-04 Thread Bo Shen

Hi Andreas,

On 9/4/2013 8:30 PM, Andreas Bießmann wrote:

Yes, we need libbch.

If we really want to enable software BCH support. It also need add
following two options in board configuration file.
---8---
#define CONFIG_NAND_ECC_BCH
#define CONFIG_BCH
---8---

So, this patch give us option to enable software BCH.

got it. So the NAND_ECC_BCH is the adoption for the SW BCH correction in
mtd layer. I understand that this would be helpful for at91 SoC without
PMECC HW. But there is no user currently, so I hesitate to apply this.


Frankly, there is no EK boards from Atmel use software BCH now, however, 
a lot of customers use NAND with 224 bytes OOB, can not use software 
ECC, they need use software BCH.
So, I think it is better to apply this patch. If it will break the rule 
of u-boot, then I think we can wait real user in u-boot need this and 
then apply this patch.



Best regards

Andreas Bießmann



Best Regards,
Bo Shen
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] MTD: atmel_nand: support for software BCH ECC

2013-09-04 Thread Andreas Bießmann
Hi Bo,

On 09/04/2013 02:46 PM, Bo Shen wrote:
 On 9/4/2013 8:30 PM, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
 Yes, we need libbch.
 
 If we really want to enable software BCH support. It also need add
 following two options in board configuration file.
 ---8---
 #define CONFIG_NAND_ECC_BCH
 #define CONFIG_BCH
 ---8---
 
 So, this patch give us option to enable software BCH.
 got it. So the NAND_ECC_BCH is the adoption for the SW BCH correction in
 mtd layer. I understand that this would be helpful for at91 SoC without
 PMECC HW. But there is no user currently, so I hesitate to apply this.
 
 Frankly, there is no EK boards from Atmel use software BCH now, however,
 a lot of customers use NAND with 224 bytes OOB, can not use software
 ECC, they need use software BCH.

I understand this. But it will be a piece of dead code until a user of
it would be submitted.

 So, I think it is better to apply this patch. If it will break the rule
 of u-boot, then I think we can wait real user in u-boot need this and
 then apply this patch.

I'd like to hear Scott's comment on that.

Best regards

Andreas Bießmann
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] MTD: atmel_nand: support for software BCH ECC

2013-09-04 Thread Scott Wood
On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 17:15 +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
 Hi Bo,
 
 On 09/04/2013 02:46 PM, Bo Shen wrote:
  On 9/4/2013 8:30 PM, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
  Yes, we need libbch.
  
  If we really want to enable software BCH support. It also need add
  following two options in board configuration file.
  ---8---
  #define CONFIG_NAND_ECC_BCH
  #define CONFIG_BCH
  ---8---
  
  So, this patch give us option to enable software BCH.
  got it. So the NAND_ECC_BCH is the adoption for the SW BCH correction in
  mtd layer. I understand that this would be helpful for at91 SoC without
  PMECC HW. But there is no user currently, so I hesitate to apply this.
  
  Frankly, there is no EK boards from Atmel use software BCH now, however,
  a lot of customers use NAND with 224 bytes OOB, can not use software
  ECC, they need use software BCH.
 
 I understand this. But it will be a piece of dead code until a user of
 it would be submitted.
 
  So, I think it is better to apply this patch. If it will break the rule
  of u-boot, then I think we can wait real user in u-boot need this and
  then apply this patch.
 
 I'd like to hear Scott's comment on that.

Is this for the benefit of out-of-tree boards, or for boards which will
be submitted but haven't yet?

In the latter case, it could be submitted at the same time.  In the
former case, of course we encourage the boards to be submitted, and we
don't generally add code solely for the benefit of out-of-tree boards.  

In any case, this is minor enough that I don't care all that much.  If
we ever get kconfig, then hopefully the dead code rules will relax to
code which could be enabled through some legal config, rather than code
which is enabled in some default config for a board.  Things like
allyesconfig and randconfig could help with build test coverage.

-Scott



___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


[U-Boot] [PATCH] MTD: atmel_nand: support for software BCH ECC

2013-08-28 Thread Bo Shen
Add possible to use software BCH ECC for atmel nand driver

Signed-off-by: Bo Shen voice.s...@gmail.com

---
 drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c |4 
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
index 96aca00..52efbee 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
@@ -1177,7 +1177,11 @@ int atmel_nand_chip_init(int devnum, ulong base_addr)
mtd-priv = nand;
nand-IO_ADDR_R = nand-IO_ADDR_W = (void  __iomem *)base_addr;
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_NAND_ECC_BCH
+   nand-ecc.mode = NAND_ECC_SOFT_BCH;
+#else
nand-ecc.mode = NAND_ECC_SOFT;
+#endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_SYS_NAND_DBW_16
nand-options = NAND_BUSWIDTH_16;
 #endif
-- 
1.7.10.4

___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot