Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1 v3] ppc4xx: Add support for GPCS, SGMII and M88E1112 PHY
Hi Stefan and Victor,
Stefan Roese wrote:
On Wednesday 03 September 2008, Victor Gallardo wrote:
This patch adds GPCS, SGMII and M88E1112 PHY support
for the AMCC PPC460GT/EX processors.
Signed-off-by: Victor Gallardo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
A good idea is to keep a history of what changed in the patch revisions here
in this area (after the ---). Something like:
v2:
- Added comments to GPCS PHY setup
- Minor coding style cleanup
v3:
- Generalized the PHY-less configuration even more
Please find some more comments below.
cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_enet.c | 162
- cpu/ppc4xx/miiphy.c |
41 -
include/ppc4xx_enet.h |3 +
3 files changed, 201 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_enet.c b/cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_enet.c
index 8a38335..e137bac 100644
--- a/cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_enet.c
+++ b/cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_enet.c
@@ -198,6 +198,7 @@
#define BI_PHYMODE_RMII 8
#endif
#endif
+#define BI_PHYMODE_SGMII 9
#if defined(CONFIG_440SP) || defined(CONFIG_440SPE) || \
defined(CONFIG_440EPX) || defined(CONFIG_440GRX) || \
@@ -216,6 +217,52 @@
#define MAL_RX_CHAN_MUL 1
#endif
+/*+
+ * PHY-less support for Ethernet Ports.
+ **/
+
+/*
+ * Some boards do not have a PHY for each ethernet port.
+ * For example on Arches board (2 CPU system) eth0 does not have
+ * a PHY, both CPU's are wired directly together (AC coupled)
+ * using SGMII0.
+ *
+ * In these cases :
+ *1) set the appropriate CONFIG_PHY_ADDR equal to CONFIG_PHY_LESS
+ * to detect that the specified ethernet port does not have a PHY.
+ *2) Then define CFG_PHY_LESS_PORT and CFG_PHY_LESS_PORTS in board
+ * configuration file. For example on the Arches board we would do
+ * the following.
+ * #define CFG_PHY_LESS_PORT(devnum,speed,duplex) \
+ * { devnum, speed, duplex},
+ * #define CFG_PHY_LESS_PORTS \
+ * CFG_PHY_LESS_PORT(0,1000,FULL)
+ */
+#if !defined(CONFIG_PHY_LESS)
+#define CONFIG_PHY_LESS 0x /* PHY-less mode */
+#endif
If we agree that this is a good generic approach for this PHY-less handling,
then we should probably move this to a common header so that other ethernet
driver can use this too.
Ben, what do you think?
And the description should be moved to a common place too. Either the
toplevel
README, or a new README.xxx in the doc directory.
I like the idea very much, but am not sure about the implementation.
This problem has been around for a while (just search the archives for
people wondering how to deal with a switch chip connected via rvMII or
whatever). The trickiest part of this is how to get the information to
the driver. I've always thought that the best way would be for board
code to initialize each controller through proper C code (i.e. not
CONFIG macros). But there's definitely something to be said for doing
it all through macros, since that's how Kconfig works. Please have a
look at the code that Andy Fleming recently submitted for the TSEC
driver (it's in the main branch now). He passes a tsec_info_struct into
each call of tsec_initialize(), allowing all type of custom information
to go in. In my mind, that could be generalized to something that more
than just TSEC, but let's take baby steps.
Incidentally, the term Fixed PHY has already been coined for what
you're calling PHY-less. I suggest we standardize.
Anyway, I have to go to bed. Eyes are starting to close and brain's
sloowwwiing doowwn.
cheers,
Ben
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1 v3] ppc4xx: Add support for GPCS, SGMII and M88E1112 PHY
On Thursday 04 September 2008, Ben Warren wrote: I like the idea very much, but am not sure about the implementation. This problem has been around for a while (just search the archives for people wondering how to deal with a switch chip connected via rvMII or whatever). The trickiest part of this is how to get the information to the driver. I've always thought that the best way would be for board code to initialize each controller through proper C code (i.e. not CONFIG macros). But there's definitely something to be said for doing it all through macros, since that's how Kconfig works. Please have a look at the code that Andy Fleming recently submitted for the TSEC driver (it's in the main branch now). He passes a tsec_info_struct into each call of tsec_initialize(), allowing all type of custom information to go in. In my mind, that could be generalized to something that more than just TSEC, but let's take baby steps. Yes, this looks like a good approach. Not sure if we should go all the way or accept Victors approach for now. Moving to this parameter based initialization is a different matter that should really be done soon. Incidentally, the term Fixed PHY has already been coined for what you're calling PHY-less. I suggest we standardize. Yes. Is there already a define available? Anyway, I have to go to bed. Eyes are starting to close and brain's sloowwwiing doowwn. Heh :) Best regards, Stefan = DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] = ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1 v3] ppc4xx: Add support for GPCS, SGMII and M88E1112 PHY
Hi Stefan and Ben, I saw what Andy Fleming's did. This is a bit to much work for what I have time for. I aggree, we need to take baby steps.. For now I'll change PHY-less to Fixed PHY and update some style issues. -Victor Gallardo -Original Message- From: Stefan Roese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 8:34 AM To: Ben Warren Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Victor Gallardo Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1 v3] ppc4xx: Add support for GPCS, SGMII and M88E1112 PHY On Thursday 04 September 2008, Ben Warren wrote: I like the idea very much, but am not sure about the implementation. This problem has been around for a while (just search the archives for people wondering how to deal with a switch chip connected via rvMII or whatever). The trickiest part of this is how to get the information to the driver. I've always thought that the best way would be for board code to initialize each controller through proper C code (i.e. not CONFIG macros). But there's definitely something to be said for doing it all through macros, since that's how Kconfig works. Please have a look at the code that Andy Fleming recently submitted for the TSEC driver (it's in the main branch now). He passes a tsec_info_struct into each call of tsec_initialize(), allowing all type of custom information to go in. In my mind, that could be generalized to something that more than just TSEC, but let's take baby steps. Yes, this looks like a good approach. Not sure if we should go all the way or accept Victors approach for now. Moving to this parameter based initialization is a different matter that should really be done soon. Incidentally, the term Fixed PHY has already been coined for what you're calling PHY-less. I suggest we standardize. Yes. Is there already a define available? Anyway, I have to go to bed. Eyes are starting to close and brain's sloowwwiing doowwn. Heh :) Best regards, Stefan = DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] = ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1 v3] ppc4xx: Add support for GPCS, SGMII and M88E1112 PHY
This patch adds GPCS, SGMII and M88E1112 PHY support
for the AMCC PPC460GT/EX processors.
Signed-off-by: Victor Gallardo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_enet.c | 162 -
cpu/ppc4xx/miiphy.c | 41 -
include/ppc4xx_enet.h |3 +
3 files changed, 201 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_enet.c b/cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_enet.c
index 8a38335..e137bac 100644
--- a/cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_enet.c
+++ b/cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_enet.c
@@ -198,6 +198,7 @@
#define BI_PHYMODE_RMII 8
#endif
#endif
+#define BI_PHYMODE_SGMII 9
#if defined(CONFIG_440SP) || defined(CONFIG_440SPE) || \
defined(CONFIG_440EPX) || defined(CONFIG_440GRX) || \
@@ -216,6 +217,52 @@
#define MAL_RX_CHAN_MUL1
#endif
+/*+
+ * PHY-less support for Ethernet Ports.
+ **/
+
+/*
+ * Some boards do not have a PHY for each ethernet port.
+ * For example on Arches board (2 CPU system) eth0 does not have
+ * a PHY, both CPU's are wired directly together (AC coupled)
+ * using SGMII0.
+ *
+ * In these cases :
+ *1) set the appropriate CONFIG_PHY_ADDR equal to CONFIG_PHY_LESS
+ * to detect that the specified ethernet port does not have a PHY.
+ *2) Then define CFG_PHY_LESS_PORT and CFG_PHY_LESS_PORTS in board
+ * configuration file. For example on the Arches board we would do
+ * the following.
+ * #define CFG_PHY_LESS_PORT(devnum,speed,duplex) \
+ * { devnum, speed, duplex},
+ * #define CFG_PHY_LESS_PORTS \
+ * CFG_PHY_LESS_PORT(0,1000,FULL)
+ */
+#if !defined(CONFIG_PHY_LESS)
+#define CONFIG_PHY_LESS0x /* PHY-less mode */
+#endif
+
+#define DFLT_PHY_LESS_SPEED100
+#define DFLT_PHY_LESS_DUPLEX FULL
+
+/*
+ * CFG_PHY_LESS_PORTS tells us about ethernet ports that have no PHY
+ * attached to them.
+ */
+#ifndef CFG_PHY_LESS_PORTS
+#define CFG_PHY_LESS_PORTS
+#endif
+
+struct phy_less_port {
+ unsigned int devnum;/* ethernet port */
+ unsigned int speed; /* specified speed 10,100 or 1000 */
+ unsigned int duplex;/* specified duplex FULL or HALF */
+};
+
+static const struct phy_less_port phy_less_port[] = {
+ CFG_PHY_LESS_PORTS /* defined in board configuration file */
+};
+
/*-+
* Global variables. TX and RX descriptors and buffers.
*-*/
@@ -611,8 +658,17 @@ int ppc_4xx_eth_setup_bridge(int devnum, bd_t * bis)
#if defined(CONFIG_460EX)
mode = 9;
+ mfsdr(SDR0_ETH_CFG, eth_cfg);
+ if (((eth_cfg SDR0_ETH_CFG_SGMII0_ENABLE) 0)
+ ((eth_cfg SDR0_ETH_CFG_SGMII1_ENABLE) 0))
+ mode = 11; /* config SGMII */
#else
mode = 10;
+ mfsdr(SDR0_ETH_CFG, eth_cfg);
+ if (((eth_cfg SDR0_ETH_CFG_SGMII0_ENABLE) 0)
+ ((eth_cfg SDR0_ETH_CFG_SGMII1_ENABLE) 0)
+ ((eth_cfg SDR0_ETH_CFG_SGMII2_ENABLE) 0))
+ mode = 12; /* config SGMII */
#endif
/* TODO:
@@ -635,6 +691,8 @@ int ppc_4xx_eth_setup_bridge(int devnum, bd_t * bis)
/*
* Right now only 2*RGMII is supported. Please extend when needed.
* sr - 2008-02-19
+* Add SGMII support.
+* vg - 2008-07-28
*/
switch (mode) {
case 1:
@@ -761,6 +819,20 @@ int ppc_4xx_eth_setup_bridge(int devnum, bd_t * bis)
bis-bi_phymode[2] = BI_PHYMODE_RGMII;
bis-bi_phymode[3] = BI_PHYMODE_RGMII;
break;
+ case 11:
+ /* 2 SGMII - 460EX */
+ bis-bi_phymode[0] = BI_PHYMODE_SGMII;
+ bis-bi_phymode[1] = BI_PHYMODE_SGMII;
+ bis-bi_phymode[2] = BI_PHYMODE_NONE;
+ bis-bi_phymode[3] = BI_PHYMODE_NONE;
+ break;
+ case 12:
+ /* 3 SGMII - 460GT */
+ bis-bi_phymode[0] = BI_PHYMODE_SGMII;
+ bis-bi_phymode[1] = BI_PHYMODE_SGMII;
+ bis-bi_phymode[2] = BI_PHYMODE_SGMII;
+ bis-bi_phymode[3] = BI_PHYMODE_NONE;
+ break;
default:
break;
}
@@ -945,6 +1017,48 @@ static int ppc_4xx_eth_init (struct eth_device *dev, bd_t
* bis)
out_be32((void *)EMAC_M1 + hw_p-hw_addr, mode_reg);
#endif /* defined(CONFIG_440GX) || defined(CONFIG_440SP) */
+#if defined(CONFIG_GPCS_PHY_ADDR) || defined(CONFIG_GPCS_PHY1_ADDR) || \
+defined(CONFIG_GPCS_PHY2_ADDR) || defined(CONFIG_GPCS_PHY3_ADDR)
+ if (bis-bi_phymode[devnum] == BI_PHYMODE_SGMII) {
+ /*
+* In SGMII mode, GPCS access is needed for
+* communication with the internal SGMII SerDes.
+*/
+ switch
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1 v3] ppc4xx: Add support for GPCS, SGMII and M88E1112 PHY
On Wednesday 03 September 2008, Victor Gallardo wrote:
This patch adds GPCS, SGMII and M88E1112 PHY support
for the AMCC PPC460GT/EX processors.
Signed-off-by: Victor Gallardo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
A good idea is to keep a history of what changed in the patch revisions here
in this area (after the ---). Something like:
v2:
- Added comments to GPCS PHY setup
- Minor coding style cleanup
v3:
- Generalized the PHY-less configuration even more
Please find some more comments below.
cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_enet.c | 162
- cpu/ppc4xx/miiphy.c |
41 -
include/ppc4xx_enet.h |3 +
3 files changed, 201 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_enet.c b/cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_enet.c
index 8a38335..e137bac 100644
--- a/cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_enet.c
+++ b/cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_enet.c
@@ -198,6 +198,7 @@
#define BI_PHYMODE_RMII 8
#endif
#endif
+#define BI_PHYMODE_SGMII 9
#if defined(CONFIG_440SP) || defined(CONFIG_440SPE) || \
defined(CONFIG_440EPX) || defined(CONFIG_440GRX) || \
@@ -216,6 +217,52 @@
#define MAL_RX_CHAN_MUL 1
#endif
+/*+
+ * PHY-less support for Ethernet Ports.
+ **/
+
+/*
+ * Some boards do not have a PHY for each ethernet port.
+ * For example on Arches board (2 CPU system) eth0 does not have
+ * a PHY, both CPU's are wired directly together (AC coupled)
+ * using SGMII0.
+ *
+ * In these cases :
+ *1) set the appropriate CONFIG_PHY_ADDR equal to CONFIG_PHY_LESS
+ * to detect that the specified ethernet port does not have a PHY.
+ *2) Then define CFG_PHY_LESS_PORT and CFG_PHY_LESS_PORTS in board
+ * configuration file. For example on the Arches board we would do
+ * the following.
+ * #define CFG_PHY_LESS_PORT(devnum,speed,duplex) \
+ * { devnum, speed, duplex},
+ * #define CFG_PHY_LESS_PORTS \
+ * CFG_PHY_LESS_PORT(0,1000,FULL)
+ */
+#if !defined(CONFIG_PHY_LESS)
+#define CONFIG_PHY_LESS 0x /* PHY-less mode */
+#endif
If we agree that this is a good generic approach for this PHY-less handling,
then we should probably move this to a common header so that other ethernet
driver can use this too.
Ben, what do you think?
And the description should be moved to a common place too. Either the toplevel
README, or a new README.xxx in the doc directory.
+
+#define DFLT_PHY_LESS_SPEED 100
+#define DFLT_PHY_LESS_DUPLEX FULL
Do we really need these defaults? Please see my comment further down.
+
+/*
+ * CFG_PHY_LESS_PORTS tells us about ethernet ports that have no PHY
+ * attached to them.
+ */
+#ifndef CFG_PHY_LESS_PORTS
+#define CFG_PHY_LESS_PORTS
+#endif
+
+struct phy_less_port {
+ unsigned int devnum;/* ethernet port */
+ unsigned int speed; /* specified speed 10,100 or 1000 */
+ unsigned int duplex;/* specified duplex FULL or HALF */
+};
Again, if we agree that this is a good solution, then this should be moved
into a common header, probably net.h.
snip
- speed = miiphy_speed (dev-name, reg);
- duplex = miiphy_duplex (dev-name, reg);
+get_speed:
+ if (reg == CONFIG_PHY_LESS) {
+ speed = DFLT_PHY_LESS_SPEED;
+ duplex = DFLT_PHY_LESS_DUPLEX;
I don't think we need this defaults here. Remove them and...
+ for (i = 0; i ARRAY_SIZE(phy_less_port); i++) {
+ if (devnum == phy_less_port[i].devnum) {
+ speed = phy_less_port[i].speed;
+ duplex = phy_less_port[i].duplex;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
...add this here:
if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(phy_less_port)) {
printf(ERROR: PHY (%s) not configured correctly!\n,
dev-name);
return -1;
}
If the PHY-less device is not in the list, then this is a misconfiguration
which should be fixed IMHO.
Best regards,
Stefan
=
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1 v3] ppc4xx: Add support for GPCS, SGMII and M88E1112 PHY
Hi Stefan,
OK. I agree, I will remove DFLT_PHY_LESS_SPEED and DFLT_PHY_LESS_DUPLEX.
In terms of a generic PHY-less approach. I'll wait for Ben's input.
-Victor Gallardo
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Roese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 12:23 AM
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Cc: Victor Gallardo; Ben Warren
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1 v3] ppc4xx: Add support for GPCS, SGMII
and M88E1112 PHY
On Wednesday 03 September 2008, Victor Gallardo wrote:
This patch adds GPCS, SGMII and M88E1112 PHY support for the AMCC
PPC460GT/EX processors.
Signed-off-by: Victor Gallardo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
A good idea is to keep a history of what changed in the patch revisions
here in this area (after the ---). Something like:
v2:
- Added comments to GPCS PHY setup
- Minor coding style cleanup
v3:
- Generalized the PHY-less configuration even more
Please find some more comments below.
cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_enet.c | 162
- cpu/ppc4xx/miiphy.c
|
41 -
include/ppc4xx_enet.h |3 +
3 files changed, 201 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_enet.c b/cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_enet.c index
8a38335..e137bac 100644
--- a/cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_enet.c
+++ b/cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_enet.c
@@ -198,6 +198,7 @@
#define BI_PHYMODE_RMII 8
#endif
#endif
+#define BI_PHYMODE_SGMII 9
#if defined(CONFIG_440SP) || defined(CONFIG_440SPE) || \
defined(CONFIG_440EPX) || defined(CONFIG_440GRX) || \ @@ -216,6
+217,52 @@
#define MAL_RX_CHAN_MUL 1
#endif
+/*---
+-+
+ * PHY-less support for Ethernet Ports.
+
+*
+*/
+
+/*
+ * Some boards do not have a PHY for each ethernet port.
+ * For example on Arches board (2 CPU system) eth0 does not have
+ * a PHY, both CPU's are wired directly together (AC coupled)
+ * using SGMII0.
+ *
+ * In these cases :
+ *1) set the appropriate CONFIG_PHY_ADDR equal to CONFIG_PHY_LESS
+ * to detect that the specified ethernet port does not have a
PHY.
+ *2) Then define CFG_PHY_LESS_PORT and CFG_PHY_LESS_PORTS in
board
+ * configuration file. For example on the Arches board we would
do
+ * the following.
+ * #define CFG_PHY_LESS_PORT(devnum,speed,duplex) \
+ * { devnum, speed, duplex},
+ * #define CFG_PHY_LESS_PORTS \
+ * CFG_PHY_LESS_PORT(0,1000,FULL)
+ */
+#if !defined(CONFIG_PHY_LESS)
+#define CONFIG_PHY_LESS 0x /* PHY-less mode */
+#endif
If we agree that this is a good generic approach for this PHY-less
handling, then we should probably move this to a common header so that
other ethernet driver can use this too.
Ben, what do you think?
And the description should be moved to a common place too. Either the
toplevel README, or a new README.xxx in the doc directory.
+
+#define DFLT_PHY_LESS_SPEED 100
+#define DFLT_PHY_LESS_DUPLEX FULL
Do we really need these defaults? Please see my comment further down.
+
+/*
+ * CFG_PHY_LESS_PORTS tells us about ethernet ports that have no PHY
+ * attached to them.
+ */
+#ifndef CFG_PHY_LESS_PORTS
+#define CFG_PHY_LESS_PORTS
+#endif
+
+struct phy_less_port {
+ unsigned int devnum;/* ethernet port */
+ unsigned int speed; /* specified speed 10,100 or 1000 */
+ unsigned int duplex;/* specified duplex FULL or HALF */
+};
Again, if we agree that this is a good solution, then this should be
moved into a common header, probably net.h.
snip
- speed = miiphy_speed (dev-name, reg);
- duplex = miiphy_duplex (dev-name, reg);
+get_speed:
+ if (reg == CONFIG_PHY_LESS) {
+ speed = DFLT_PHY_LESS_SPEED;
+ duplex = DFLT_PHY_LESS_DUPLEX;
I don't think we need this defaults here. Remove them and...
+ for (i = 0; i ARRAY_SIZE(phy_less_port); i++) {
+ if (devnum == phy_less_port[i].devnum) {
+ speed = phy_less_port[i].speed;
+ duplex = phy_less_port[i].duplex;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
...add this here:
if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(phy_less_port)) {
printf(ERROR: PHY (%s) not configured
correctly!\n,
dev-name);
return -1;
}
If the PHY-less device is not in the list, then this is a
misconfiguration which should be fixed IMHO.
Best regards,
Stefan
=
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED
