Re: [U-Boot] PATCH: IXP465 support and some IXP4xx rework, Sidewinder board support
Wolfgang Denk [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 08.10.2008 12:56:28: Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED], In message OF8F1EBCA2.E6BA03A3-ONC12574DC.003A8028-C12574DC. [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Ups, fixed the subject line manually. Sorry. Note: your mailer also fails to add threading information (i. e. In-reply-to: and References: headers. which is beyond my control *sigh* Please use my other mail address and I'll find a way to use Thunderbird... HS ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] PATCH: IXP465 support and some IXP4xx rework, Sidewinder board support
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED], In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Ups, fixed the subject line manually. Sorry. Note: your mailer also fails to add threading information (i. e. In-reply-to: and References: headers. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In any group of employed individuals the only naturally early riser is _always_ the office manager, who will _always_ leave reproachful little notes ... on the desks of their subordinates. - Terry Pratchett, _Lords and Ladies_ ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] PATCH: IXP465 support and some IXP4xx rework, Sidewinder board support
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, on the matter of getting u-boot work with the ADI Sidewinder Reference Platform, I found the previously posted patches and used them as starting point for my own patch set. The Sidewinder board works with this patch, including ECC (optional). There is a minimum set of ifdefs in cpu/ixp/start.S and no board-specific low-level.S and thus no endless code-duplication. The SDRAM parameters are handled by configuration definitions. The ixp425.h and ixp465.h header files should be merged but that can follow in a different patch, possibly renaming the defines and fixing all board specific code. I think that you use my patchset. It is true? The new initialisation routine was also tested on an IXP425, it really works on both. Great :) The npe_less_fw.patch allows to have NPE-C firmware and still use NPE-B. There is no need to load firmware to NPE-C if you are not going to use it. This work was done for Erhardt+Leimer GmbH. Regards Michael ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
[U-Boot] PATCH: IXP465 support and some IXP4xx rework, Sidewinder board support
Hi, on the matter of getting u-boot work with the ADI Sidewinder Reference Platform, I found the previously posted patches and used them as starting point for my own patch set. The Sidewinder board works with this patch, including ECC (optional). There is a minimum set of ifdefs in cpu/ixp/start.S and no board-specific low-level.S and thus no endless code-duplication. The SDRAM parameters are handled by configuration definitions. The ixp425.h and ixp465.h header files should be merged but that can follow in a different patch, possibly renaming the defines and fixing all board specific code. The new initialisation routine was also tested on an IXP425, it really works on both. The npe_less_fw.patch allows to have NPE-C firmware and still use NPE-B. There is no need to load firmware to NPE-C if you are not going to use it. This work was done for Erhardt+Leimer GmbH. Note: I hope this can be merged, however, your description at http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/Patches makes me worry. I can only use Lotus Notes and that's a bit limited. No, I cannot use another MUA from here, really! If you can accept them at attachments (patches with description header, diff index and Signed-off-by line, I use quilt locallly). Sincerly, Hendrik Sattler PS: please CC on answers as I am not subscribed. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
