In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If we go to date based versions. I'd prefer we keep year as 4 digits:
> >
> > v1.2008.10
> > v1.2009.01
>
>
> I agree, although doing that makes the third field look like a month
> to the uninitiated. Perhaps use a letter like 'r' for revision
> instead of a period for the second separator like so:
But it *is* a month...
> v1.2008r06
v1.2008.06 would mean the June release in year 2008.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Morality is one thing. Ratings are everything."
- A Network 23 executive on "Max Headroom"
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
___
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users