In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If we go to date based versions. I'd prefer we keep year as 4 digits: > > > > v1.2008.10 > > v1.2009.01 > > > I agree, although doing that makes the third field look like a month > to the uninitiated. Perhaps use a letter like 'r' for revision > instead of a period for the second separator like so:
But it *is* a month... > v1.2008r06 v1.2008.06 would mean the June release in year 2008. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Morality is one thing. Ratings are everything." - A Network 23 executive on "Max Headroom" ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
