[U2] [UV] Uvnetd error
We're getting an error message on a newly built windows machine when trying to connect from aix using remote files. uvnetd: EURO functionality enabled on remote machine. This seems familiar but indexinfocus is not up at the moment and I can't remember what this related to. NLS is not installed and the CONFIG setup looks the same as the dev machine... Anyone have any ideas? UV 10.0.4/Win2k UV 10.0.7/aix Cheers, Stuart Boydell ** This email message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of addressed recipient(s). If you have received this email in error please notify the Spotless IS Support Centre (61 3 9269 7555) immediately who will advise further action. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses. ** --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] Using mapped drives with DOS command in UV
DISCLAIMER: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that there is no guarantee that this email or any attachment is virus free or has not been intercepted or amended. Hello all, I have Universe running on a windows server. On the windows server I have a mapped drive, Z, which is basically the C drive on another machine. I need to run an application on the other machine from the Universe server. The problem appears to be that Universe doesn't recognise the shared drive, although I am able to use it from a Windows Dos session. I am not sure if this is a security setting, but it's stopping me from running the application on another server. Is anyone aware who to get around this or maybe another approach to this problem that I haven't tried yet? Thanks Andy Moore Selima Software Ltd Tel: 0114 2815000 Fax: 0114 281 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Support: http://tracker.selima.co.uk http://tracker.selima.co.uk/ Forum: http://forum.selima.co.uk http://forum.selima.co.uk/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Using mapped drives with DOS command in UV
We have this setup in our VOC for one of our processes. It maps the Drive to T: I have found that you need to run this with every new session (Don't know why) but the good thing is, if you run it more than once, it just gives an error the second time - Something about being already mapped - , but does not cause any problems DOS /C NET USE T: Path to Connect to Password /USER:User Name Regards Bjorn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Moore Sent: 22 July 2005 01:15 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Using mapped drives with DOS command in UV DISCLAIMER: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that there is no guarantee that this email or any attachment is virus free or has not been intercepted or amended. Hello all, I have Universe running on a windows server. On the windows server I have a mapped drive, Z, which is basically the C drive on another machine. I need to run an application on the other machine from the Universe server. The problem appears to be that Universe doesn't recognise the shared drive, although I am able to use it from a Windows Dos session. I am not sure if this is a security setting, but it's stopping me from running the application on another server. Is anyone aware who to get around this or maybe another approach to this problem that I haven't tried yet? Thanks Andy Moore Selima Software Ltd Tel: 0114 2815000 Fax: 0114 281 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Support: http://tracker.selima.co.uk http://tracker.selima.co.uk/ Forum: http://forum.selima.co.uk http://forum.selima.co.uk/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] Create Secondary Indices with Relative Paths in file header
Interesting. I added this to support something else entirely, but you could actually use AT ACCOUNT like: CREATE.INDEX MYFILE INDEXNAME AT /some/other/path I know the documentation SAYS that you have to have an entry in UV.ACCOUNT, but i implemented it to be pretty flexible. As long as /some/other/path resolves to a Type1 or Type19 directory you can do this. You REALLY do want a FULL path where your indexes exist, because if you have remote connections that use the file, it has to resolve where indexes are. _ I reject your reality and substitute my own - Adam Savage Glenn M. Herbert - Connectivity Development Engineer Information Integration Solutions, IBM Software Group 50 Washington Street Westboro, MA 01581 508-599-7281 direct Womack, Adrian [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/22/2005 04:31 AM Please respond to u2-users To u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org cc Subject RE: [U2] [UV] Create Secondary Indices with Relative Paths in file header Craig, Initially I thought - wow, this is a good idea. But after trying it out, I realise it entirely depends on the files existing in the same account as you're accessing them. The majority of our data files (and hence their indices) exist in other directories (not necessarily accounts) - so the relative AK pointers don't work. It was a good idea though. Adrian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Bennett Sent: Friday, 22 July 2005 3:00 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] [UV] Create Secondary Indices with Relative Paths in file header Hi All, apologies if you have already thought of this, but if you haven't you might find it useful. When UV creates secondary indices, it creates a directory in the account directory called I_file which holds the indices associated with file. The absolute path to this file is then stored in the file header. This causes problems if you copy the file using the os as the file points to the original index not to the copied index (assuming you copied the file and I_file). However CREATE.INDEX allows you to supply AT ACCOUNT to create the index for a file in an account other than the current account. To have file refer to I_file using a relative path (ie ./I_file instead of /account/I_file) you can do the following: 1. Create an entry in UV.ACCOUNT called CURRENT.ACCOUNT with a . in attribute 11. If you logto CURRENT.ACCOUNT you stay exactly where you are since you perform LOGTO .. 2. Create your indices specifying AT CURRENT.ACCOUNT. The file headers will then contain ./I_file rather than /account/I_file. Now the file and I_file can be copied to other locations and the index will not break. Craig --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ DISCLAIMER: Disclaimer. This e-mail is private and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise us by return e-mail immediately, and delete the e-mail and any attachments without using or disclosing the contents in any way. The views expressed in this e-mail are those of the author, and do not represent those of this company unless this is clearly indicated. You should scan this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. This company accepts no liability for any direct or indirect damage or loss resulting from the use of any attachments to this e-mail. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] London - Again
Unleash the soccer hooligans!! Seriously, my prayers are with all those in London who have to put up with this madness. Stay safe, stay alert. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] THE variable names
In a message dated 7/21/2005 11:59:28 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If you are unwilling to open your eyes and mind to new things (although REMOVE is not new), there is not much any of us can do. And I thought I was resistant to change. ;^) I don't think you've been paying attention at all :) I did not say I was resistent to change. I asked for a good example of why you'd use REMOVE in place of READNEXT. If you're going to advocate a position so strongly you should be willing to back it up Will --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] London - Again
It's getting kind of crazy here. I heard on the news this morning that they arrested a man setting in his truck outside of a train station. He had a Tazer and a machete under the seat. I guess I better not go to a train station, my pickup has more implements of destruction in it than that. - Original Message - From: Don Kibbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 10:05 AM Subject: Re: [U2] London - Again Unleash the soccer hooligans!! Seriously, my prayers are with all those in London who have to put up with this madness. Stay safe, stay alert. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] UniVerse Internals Training (UK)
It's that time again, though plenty of notice this time Many of the topics discussed on this list are covered by the UniVerse Internals course. The next scheduled course in the UK is for the week starting 12 September. This course is frequently cancelled due to insufficient attendees which is obviously disappointing for those who did want to go. For more information and bookings, call IBM's UK training department on 01784 445013. Martin Phillips Ladybridge Systems 17b Coldstream Lane, Hardingstone, Northampton NN4 6DB +44-(0)1604-709200 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2][UV]Error Handling
Is there a way to override error handling in Universe to do something other than display a message and halt program execution? What I would like is to have Universe send some sort of notification when an error occurs. Nick Cipollina Pick Programmer ACS - Heritage Information Systems, Inc. 2810 North Parham Road, Suite 210 Richmond, VA 23294 (804)644-8707 x 314 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] Orlando, FL
The company I work for, currently in Southeast Florida (USA) is thinking about moving to the Orlando area. I wanted want the market for recruiting permanent Unidata developers (not consultants, sorry, not this time) in the Orlando area was like. If we move, will I be high and dry if my current staff decides not to make the move? Reply offline, if desired. Thanks, Name and Company Withheld Message sent using www.aspwebsoft.com --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Internal date conversion
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Gordon J Glorfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes FYI This does work in UV. Which is odd to me. I had always thought that in an ICONV anything following the D was ignored. I wonder when this changed? It's been in PI as long as I can remember ... I've learned something new so it's not a completely wasted day. If you want to learn a bit more :-) D4-YMD means date, 4-digit year, - as separator, order is year month day. It's very flexible, you can tell it exactly what you want. Cheers, Wol -- Anthony W. Youngman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'Yings, yow graley yin! Suz ae rikt dheu,' said the blue man, taking the thimble. 'What *is* he?' said Magrat. 'They're gnomes,' said Nanny. The man lowered the thimble. 'Pictsies!' Carpe Jugulum, Terry Pratchett 1998 Visit the MaVerick web-site - http://www.maverick-dbms.org Open Source Pick --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] [UV] Select Question
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes In a message dated 7/13/2005 9:11:23 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: SELECT FILE TO LIST LOOP READNEXT ID FROM LIST ELSE ID = @AM UNTIL ID = @AM DO REPEAT SELECT FILE LOOP READNEXT ID ELSE ID = @AM UNTIL ID = @AM DO REPEAT I agree that I don't see any extra overhead. But why do you use an odd convention like ID = @AM ? In this small loop it's probably apparent what you're doing but if the distance between the LOOP and the UNTIL were large enough I dare say you'd be adding confusion to the mix for any future programmer. What I do is DONE = @FALSE LOOP READNEXT ID ELSE DONE = @TRUE UNTIL DONE DO REPEAT I think DONE is a more clear-cut variable usage rather than setting ID to @AM personally. Just my opinion. Until someone puts a GOSUB in and corrupts your DONE variable. You're far less likely to corrupt ID because you're more likely to be using it. Cheers, Wol -- Anthony W. Youngman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'Yings, yow graley yin! Suz ae rikt dheu,' said the blue man, taking the thimble. 'What *is* he?' said Magrat. 'They're gnomes,' said Nanny. The man lowered the thimble. 'Pictsies!' Carpe Jugulum, Terry Pratchett 1998 Visit the MaVerick web-site - http://www.maverick-dbms.org Open Source Pick --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] THE variable names
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes In a message dated 7/21/2005 11:59:28 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If you are unwilling to open your eyes and mind to new things (although REMOVE is not new), there is not much any of us can do. And I thought I was resistant to change. ;^) I don't think you've been paying attention at all :) I did not say I was resistent to change. I asked for a good example of why you'd use REMOVE in place of READNEXT. If you're going to advocate a position so strongly you should be willing to back it up I can't give an example, but I can certainly give a situation ... As somebody else pointed out, if you have a COMPLEX dynamic array, REMOVE and READNEXT give completely different results. If one works, the other will corrupt your data. And as I said, I'd use REMOVE in place of READNEXT for clarity - I've never known anybody use READNEXT :-) Cheers, Wol -- Anthony W. Youngman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'Yings, yow graley yin! Suz ae rikt dheu,' said the blue man, taking the thimble. 'What *is* he?' said Magrat. 'They're gnomes,' said Nanny. The man lowered the thimble. 'Pictsies!' Carpe Jugulum, Terry Pratchett 1998 Visit the MaVerick web-site - http://www.maverick-dbms.org Open Source Pick --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] Select Question
Why even have an exit variable, when EXIT works great? LOOP READNEXT ID ELSE EXIT GOSUB DO.STUFF REPEAT Nice and clean and simple. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anthony W. Youngman Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 13:37 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] Select Question In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes In a message dated 7/13/2005 9:11:23 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: SELECT FILE TO LIST LOOP READNEXT ID FROM LIST ELSE ID = @AM UNTIL ID = @AM DO REPEAT SELECT FILE LOOP READNEXT ID ELSE ID = @AM UNTIL ID = @AM DO REPEAT I agree that I don't see any extra overhead. But why do you use an odd convention like ID = @AM ? In this small loop it's probably apparent what you're doing but if the distance between the LOOP and the UNTIL were large enough I dare say you'd be adding confusion to the mix for any future programmer. What I do is DONE = @FALSE LOOP READNEXT ID ELSE DONE = @TRUE UNTIL DONE DO REPEAT I think DONE is a more clear-cut variable usage rather than setting ID to @AM personally. Just my opinion. Until someone puts a GOSUB in and corrupts your DONE variable. You're far less likely to corrupt ID because you're more likely to be using it. Cheers, Wol -- Anthony W. Youngman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'Yings, yow graley yin! Suz ae rikt dheu,' said the blue man, taking the thimble. 'What *is* he?' said Magrat. 'They're gnomes,' said Nanny. The man lowered the thimble. 'Pictsies!' Carpe Jugulum, Terry Pratchett 1998 Visit the MaVerick web-site - http://www.maverick-dbms.org Open Source Pick --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] Select Question
LOOP while READNEXT ID GOSUB DO.STUFF REPEAT -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Allen E. Elwood Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 05:34 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Select Question Why even have an exit variable, when EXIT works great? LOOP READNEXT ID ELSE EXIT GOSUB DO.STUFF REPEAT Nice and clean and simple. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anthony W. Youngman Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 13:37 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] Select Question In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes In a message dated 7/13/2005 9:11:23 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: SELECT FILE TO LIST LOOP READNEXT ID FROM LIST ELSE ID = @AM UNTIL ID = @AM DO REPEAT SELECT FILE LOOP READNEXT ID ELSE ID = @AM UNTIL ID = @AM DO REPEAT I agree that I don't see any extra overhead. But why do you use an odd convention like ID = @AM ? In this small loop it's probably apparent what you're doing but if the distance between the LOOP and the UNTIL were large enough I dare say you'd be adding confusion to the mix for any future programmer. What I do is DONE = @FALSE LOOP READNEXT ID ELSE DONE = @TRUE UNTIL DONE DO REPEAT I think DONE is a more clear-cut variable usage rather than setting ID to @AM personally. Just my opinion. Until someone puts a GOSUB in and corrupts your DONE variable. You're far less likely to corrupt ID because you're more likely to be using it. Cheers, Wol -- Anthony W. Youngman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'Yings, yow graley yin! Suz ae rikt dheu,' said the blue man, taking the thimble. 'What *is* he?' said Magrat. 'They're gnomes,' said Nanny. The man lowered the thimble. 'Pictsies!' Carpe Jugulum, Terry Pratchett 1998 Visit the MaVerick web-site - http://www.maverick-dbms.org Open Source Pick --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] London - Again
It's always been this way. History is repeating itself: Contrary to popular belief, Adolf Hitler, second cousin to Osama Bin Laden are currently winning their war against freedom. Bin Laden's stated objective is to disrupt and destroy our Western culture and the freedoms associated with it. I wonder sometimes, in the USA, a representative form of government, who the current majority are representing. Bin Laden writes the script and the current majority running this country enact laws according to his will. Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger. -- Herman Goering at the Nuremberg trials Those who forget history, repeat it. I never forget, Jesus is a liberal. As part of his mission to separate believers from the rest, I am _very_ comfortable knowing I've passed the test. Let those radicals do their thing. They'll soon fade into history. Seek them out and give them your shirt too. Yes, some souls will be sent home, but drag me from my car because I own a tazer and accuse me of terrorism? These are people who have failed the test. Signed, A Liberal For Eternity; Following Or Christ Jesus Teachings. On 7/22/05, Jerry Banker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's getting kind of crazy here. I heard on the news this morning that they arrested a man setting in his truck outside of a train station. He had a Tazer and a machete under the seat. I guess I better not go to a train station, my pickup has more implements of destruction in it than that. - Original Message - From: Don Kibbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 10:05 AM Subject: Re: [U2] London - Again Unleash the soccer hooligans!! Seriously, my prayers are with all those in London who have to put up with this madness. Stay safe, stay alert. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] Select Question
Cute! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of gerry-u2ug Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 15:11 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Select Question LOOP while READNEXT ID GOSUB DO.STUFF REPEAT -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Allen E. Elwood Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 05:34 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Select Question Why even have an exit variable, when EXIT works great? LOOP READNEXT ID ELSE EXIT GOSUB DO.STUFF REPEAT Nice and clean and simple. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anthony W. Youngman Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 13:37 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] Select Question In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes In a message dated 7/13/2005 9:11:23 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: SELECT FILE TO LIST LOOP READNEXT ID FROM LIST ELSE ID = @AM UNTIL ID = @AM DO REPEAT SELECT FILE LOOP READNEXT ID ELSE ID = @AM UNTIL ID = @AM DO REPEAT I agree that I don't see any extra overhead. But why do you use an odd convention like ID = @AM ? In this small loop it's probably apparent what you're doing but if the distance between the LOOP and the UNTIL were large enough I dare say you'd be adding confusion to the mix for any future programmer. What I do is DONE = @FALSE LOOP READNEXT ID ELSE DONE = @TRUE UNTIL DONE DO REPEAT I think DONE is a more clear-cut variable usage rather than setting ID to @AM personally. Just my opinion. Until someone puts a GOSUB in and corrupts your DONE variable. You're far less likely to corrupt ID because you're more likely to be using it. Cheers, Wol -- Anthony W. Youngman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'Yings, yow graley yin! Suz ae rikt dheu,' said the blue man, taking the thimble. 'What *is* he?' said Magrat. 'They're gnomes,' said Nanny. The man lowered the thimble. 'Pictsies!' Carpe Jugulum, Terry Pratchett 1998 Visit the MaVerick web-site - http://www.maverick-dbms.org Open Source Pick --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] London - Again
Dean, If this belongs on the lists at all, it belongs on u2-community. Everyone who wishes to continue this theme, please take it there. If you do not have access to u2-community, please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/, enter your e-mail address, and 'browse all' lists to maintain your access. - Charles Barouch Moderator --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] UD 7.1 PE Limitations
Hello, I installed the latest version of UniData PE on a little PII I have here at home. The java class I wrote for version 6.1 which uses UniObjects for Java will no longer connect to that box. I get a No RPC connection active exception. This java class worked just fine under 6.1 PE. So - I reinstalled 6.1 PE and I still cannot connect. I'm trying to connect from another box here at home across my network. I think I read somewhere that the only connection UD7.1 PE will allow now is a straight telnet connection. Is this true? If so then why can't I just uninstall 7.1 and reinstall 6.1 and be back in biz? nmap -sS of the UD box shows port 111 open. netstat -a | grep uvrpc shows tcp0 0 *:uvrpc *:* LISTEN showud USER PID TIME COMMAND root8789 0:00 /usr/ud61/bin/cleanupd -m 10 -t 20 root8784 0:00 /usr/ud61/bin/sbcs -r root8762 0:00 /usr/ud61/bin/smm -t 60 root8777 0:00 /usr/unishared/unirpc/unirpcd Now here's an odd thing: I had at one time installed UD61 PE on a box at work to use to test my remote connectivity. I was able to connect and read a file remotely. I have not touched that box since then. The same java class I have used in the past to test my remote connection, no longer works either. If I run this code from inside the building at work, it connects just fine. No firewall issue that I can tell, as I have port 31438 open. Can anybody shed any light on what I might look at? Java code posted upon necessity. Thanks, Bob Little Graphik Dimensions, Ltd. High Point, NC --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] London - Again
Can we please keep political statements out of this forum? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Fox Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 4:02 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] London - Again It's always been this way. History is repeating itself: Contrary to popular belief, Adolf Hitler, second cousin to Osama Bin Laden are currently winning their war against freedom. Bin Laden's stated objective is to disrupt and destroy our Western culture and the freedoms associated with it. I wonder sometimes, in the USA, a representative form of government, who the current majority are representing. Bin Laden writes the script and the current majority running this country enact laws according to his will. Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger. -- Herman Goering at the Nuremberg trials Those who forget history, repeat it. I never forget, Jesus is a liberal. As part of his mission to separate believers from the rest, I am _very_ comfortable knowing I've passed the test. Let those radicals do their thing. They'll soon fade into history. Seek them out and give them your shirt too. Yes, some souls will be sent home, but drag me from my car because I own a tazer and accuse me of terrorism? These are people who have failed the test. Signed, A Liberal For Eternity; Following Or Christ Jesus Teachings. On 7/22/05, Jerry Banker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's getting kind of crazy here. I heard on the news this morning that they arrested a man setting in his truck outside of a train station. He had a Tazer and a machete under the seat. I guess I better not go to a train station, my pickup has more implements of destruction in it than that. - Original Message - From: Don Kibbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 10:05 AM Subject: Re: [U2] London - Again Unleash the soccer hooligans!! Seriously, my prayers are with all those in London who have to put up with this madness. Stay safe, stay alert. --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] Select Question
READNEXT ID FROM LIST ELSE ID = @AM But why do you use an odd convention like ID = @AM ? because it would be impossible for ID to be an attribute mark via readnext. If you later test for ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) there's only one way that could have happened. I'll admit to occasionally doing similar things: READ REC ... ELSE REC = @IM ;* something impossible. or LAST.BREAKDAT = @AM ; * init to something impossible LOOP ... BREAKDAT = REC 10 IF BREAKDAT = LAST.BREAKAT THEN GOSUB INCREMENT.TOTALS END ELSE GOSUB BREAKPOINT LAST.BREAKDAT = BREAKDAT END ... REPEAT But with readnext I do prefer to dispense with flags and extra coding LOOP WHILE READNEXT ID . . . REPEAT I believe any statement that has THEN ELSE clauses can be used this way. E.g.: LOOP WHILE READSEQ LINE FROM F . . . REPEAT cds --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
