Re: [U2] 1

2011-03-12 Thread D Averch
.Magic erection is possible!  http://relaxationstation.biz/links.php?es=15z1
  
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] -1 and Null values

2010-05-03 Thread Dan McGrath
Actually, I think I've just remembered part of it, but not the rest.

Appends an empty string:

REC = A
REC-1 = 

Doesn't append an empty string:

REC = 
REC-1 = 

Sets REC2 to an empty string:

REC = A
REC2,-1 = 

Doesn't append an empty string:

REC = 
REC1,-1 = 

I think my mind hasn't returned from vacation yet... Interesting that it
changed in UniVerse though, Kate.

-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kate Stanton
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 3:53 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] -1 and Null values

Hi Dan,

You are not the crazy one.  It changed some years ago (UniVerse anyway)
- we 
found out the hard way.

That and the user number not being the user number for phantom (ie
client) 
users have caused a great deal of heartache for us.

Scary thing is what else might change!  We avoid use of NOT() when data 
might be alpha, in case that changes to give runtime error.

Kate Stanton
Walstan Systems Ltd
4 Kelmarna Ave, Herne Bay, Auckland 1011, New Zealand
Ph: +64 9 360 5310  Fax: +64 9 376 0750  Mobile: +64 21 400 486
Email: k...@walstan.com

- Original Message - 
From: Dan McGrath dmc...@imb.com.au
To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 5:35 PM
Subject: [U2] -1 and Null values


 Hi all,



 Hopefully I'm not going crazy, but I could have sworn in UD 7.1 that
 doing a -1 to append an empty string would not actually appended
 anything. For example:



 REC = 'A'

 REC-1 = ''



 Would result in REC equaling 'A', not 'A':@AM



 In fact, I even have some in-house tools I wrote that rely on -1
 trimming out empty strings. Now, it appears in UD 7.2.5 that this is
no
 longer the case and it does equal 'A':@AM. I've been through all the
 release notes and cannot see any changes that would have affected
this.
 I've also looked through all the UDT.OPTIONS and see nothing
relevant...



 Am I going crazy or has this indeed changed?



 Cheers,

 Dan








###
 The information transmitted in this message and attachments (if any)
is 
 intended only
 for the person or entity to which it is addressed. The message may
contain 
 confidential
 and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination
or 
 other use of
 or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons
or 
 entities other
 than the intended recipient is prohibited.  If you received this in
error, 
 please
 contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

 The intended recipient of this e-mail may only use, reproduce,
disclose or 
 distribute
 the information contained in this e-mail and any attached files with
the 
 permission of IMB.


###
 ___
 U2-Users mailing list
 U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
 http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users 

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__
###
The information transmitted in this message and attachments (if any) is 
intended only
for the person or entity to which it is addressed. The message may contain 
confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other 
use of
or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or 
entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited.  If you received this in error, 
please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

The intended recipient of this e-mail may only use, reproduce, disclose or 
distribute
the information contained in this e-mail and any attached files with the 
permission of IMB.
###
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] -1 and Null values

2010-05-03 Thread Symeon Breen
I think it depends on what flavour you are in as well - a number of the
older pickies I work with keep forgetting this behaviour so i assume it is
newer rather than older...  it is rather annoying when you are building up
some associated arrays and for some reason a null pops up in the data
somewhere - it throws the arrays out of synch

-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Dan McGrath
Sent: 03 May 2010 07:13
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] -1 and Null values

Actually, I think I've just remembered part of it, but not the rest.

Appends an empty string:

REC = A
REC-1 = 

Doesn't append an empty string:

REC = 
REC-1 = 

Sets REC2 to an empty string:

REC = A
REC2,-1 = 

Doesn't append an empty string:

REC = 
REC1,-1 = 

I think my mind hasn't returned from vacation yet... Interesting that it
changed in UniVerse though, Kate.

-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kate Stanton
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 3:53 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] -1 and Null values

Hi Dan,

You are not the crazy one.  It changed some years ago (UniVerse anyway)
- we 
found out the hard way.

That and the user number not being the user number for phantom (ie
client) 
users have caused a great deal of heartache for us.

Scary thing is what else might change!  We avoid use of NOT() when data 
might be alpha, in case that changes to give runtime error.

Kate Stanton
Walstan Systems Ltd
4 Kelmarna Ave, Herne Bay, Auckland 1011, New Zealand
Ph: +64 9 360 5310  Fax: +64 9 376 0750  Mobile: +64 21 400 486
Email: k...@walstan.com

- Original Message - 
From: Dan McGrath dmc...@imb.com.au
To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 5:35 PM
Subject: [U2] -1 and Null values


 Hi all,



 Hopefully I'm not going crazy, but I could have sworn in UD 7.1 that
 doing a -1 to append an empty string would not actually appended
 anything. For example:



 REC = 'A'

 REC-1 = ''



 Would result in REC equaling 'A', not 'A':@AM



 In fact, I even have some in-house tools I wrote that rely on -1
 trimming out empty strings. Now, it appears in UD 7.2.5 that this is
no
 longer the case and it does equal 'A':@AM. I've been through all the
 release notes and cannot see any changes that would have affected
this.
 I've also looked through all the UDT.OPTIONS and see nothing
relevant...



 Am I going crazy or has this indeed changed?



 Cheers,

 Dan








###
 The information transmitted in this message and attachments (if any)
is 
 intended only
 for the person or entity to which it is addressed. The message may
contain 
 confidential
 and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination
or 
 other use of
 or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons
or 
 entities other
 than the intended recipient is prohibited.  If you received this in
error, 
 please
 contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

 The intended recipient of this e-mail may only use, reproduce,
disclose or 
 distribute
 the information contained in this e-mail and any attached files with
the 
 permission of IMB.


###
 ___
 U2-Users mailing list
 U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
 http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users 

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__

###
The information transmitted in this message and attachments (if any) is
intended only
for the person or entity to which it is addressed. The message may contain
confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or
other use of
or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or
entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited.  If you received this in error,
please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

The intended recipient of this e-mail may only use, reproduce, disclose or
distribute
the information contained in this e-mail and any attached files with the
permission of IMB.

###
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users

Re: [U2] -1 and Null values

2010-05-03 Thread Mecki Foerthmann
Well, I always thought this was an inconsistency.
After all unlike SQL in Pick Null is a valid value.
I've never used -1 to suppress the writing of null values into
multi-valued fields because I hoped they would eventually fix that bug.
And for populating attributes I wouldn't use it anyway.
If I don't want to write nulls I test for it (IF VALUE #  THEN...).
I think otherwise it's just lazy programming.
And isn't it just the opposite to what Symeon is saying?
Not putting nulls in gets associated arrays out of sync and therefore
you couldn't use X,-1 before to populate them.
You needed to keep track of the position and use code like VARC-1 =
VALUE1; POS = DCOUNT(VARC,@VM);VARX,POS = VALUE to make sure your
array stays in sync if VALUE could be null.
If your controlling attribute contains product codes for instance and
dependent attributes contain colour codes, serial or lot numbers or bin
locations you would want nulls in there if those are optional, or
wouldn't you?

just my 2 pennies

Mecki

Symeon Breen wrote:
 I think it depends on what flavour you are in as well - a number of the
 older pickies I work with keep forgetting this behaviour so i assume it is
 newer rather than older...  it is rather annoying when you are building up
 some associated arrays and for some reason a null pops up in the data
 somewhere - it throws the arrays out of synch

 -Original Message-
 From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
 [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Dan McGrath
 Sent: 03 May 2010 07:13
 To: U2 Users List
 Subject: Re: [U2] -1 and Null values

 Actually, I think I've just remembered part of it, but not the rest.

 Appends an empty string:

 REC = A
 REC-1 = 

 Doesn't append an empty string:

 REC = 
 REC-1 = 

 Sets REC2 to an empty string:

 REC = A
 REC2,-1 = 

 Doesn't append an empty string:

 REC = 
 REC1,-1 = 

 I think my mind hasn't returned from vacation yet... Interesting that it
 changed in UniVerse though, Kate.

 -Original Message-
 From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
 [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kate Stanton
 Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 3:53 PM
 To: U2 Users List
 Subject: Re: [U2] -1 and Null values

 Hi Dan,

 You are not the crazy one.  It changed some years ago (UniVerse anyway)
 - we 
 found out the hard way.

 That and the user number not being the user number for phantom (ie
 client) 
 users have caused a great deal of heartache for us.

 Scary thing is what else might change!  We avoid use of NOT() when data 
 might be alpha, in case that changes to give runtime error.

 Kate Stanton
 Walstan Systems Ltd
 4 Kelmarna Ave, Herne Bay, Auckland 1011, New Zealand
 Ph: +64 9 360 5310  Fax: +64 9 376 0750  Mobile: +64 21 400 486
 Email: k...@walstan.com

 - Original Message - 
 From: Dan McGrath dmc...@imb.com.au
 To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 5:35 PM
 Subject: [U2] -1 and Null values


   
 Hi all,



 Hopefully I'm not going crazy, but I could have sworn in UD 7.1 that
 doing a -1 to append an empty string would not actually appended
 anything. For example:



 REC = 'A'

 REC-1 = ''



 Would result in REC equaling 'A', not 'A':@AM



 In fact, I even have some in-house tools I wrote that rely on -1
 trimming out empty strings. Now, it appears in UD 7.2.5 that this is
 
 no
   
 longer the case and it does equal 'A':@AM. I've been through all the
 release notes and cannot see any changes that would have affected
 
 this.
   
 I've also looked through all the UDT.OPTIONS and see nothing
 
 relevant...
   

 Am I going crazy or has this indeed changed?



 Cheers,

 Dan







 
 
 ###
   
 The information transmitted in this message and attachments (if any)
 
 is 
   
 intended only
 for the person or entity to which it is addressed. The message may
 
 contain 
   
 confidential
 and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination
 
 or 
   
 other use of
 or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons
 
 or 
   
 entities other
 than the intended recipient is prohibited.  If you received this in
 
 error, 
   
 please
 contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

 The intended recipient of this e-mail may only use, reproduce,
 
 disclose or 
   
 distribute
 the information contained in this e-mail and any attached files with
 
 the 
   
 permission of IMB.

 
 
 ###
   
 ___
 U2-Users mailing list
 U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
 http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users 
 

 ___
 U2-Users mailing list
 U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
 http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Re: [U2] -1 and Null values

2010-05-03 Thread Brian Leach
In UniVerse this is configurable via the $OPTIONS EXTRA.DELIM flag as well
as being flavor dependent.

But also in UniVerse, there is a specific null value (@NULL) as opposed to
an empty string which is logically different.

Brian

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] -1 and Null values

2010-05-03 Thread Anthony W. Youngman
In message ddc8e880ea0e4f438407b6fa651ca12f07eae...@es02.imb.net, Dan 
McGrath dmc...@imb.com.au writes

Hi all,



Hopefully I'm not going crazy, but I could have sworn in UD 7.1 that
doing a -1 to append an empty string would not actually appended
anything. For example:

As I understood it, the problem was always appending TO an empty string, 
not appending an empty string (though I was always used to INFORMATION 
:-)


Because an empty string could have no values, or 1 empty value, PI 
always assumed it had no values. So ...


VAR = 
VAR-1 = 
VAR-1 = A

would leave VAR equal to A

But a further
VAR-1 = 
would then append a null to give A:@FM

All very logical (as I would expect from Prime :-)

Cheers,
Wol
--
Anthony W. Youngman pi...@thewolery.demon.co.uk
'Yings, yow graley yin! Suz ae rikt dheu,' said the blue man, taking the
thimble. 'What *is* he?' said Magrat. 'They're gnomes,' said Nanny. The man
lowered the thimble. 'Pictsies!' Carpe Jugulum, Terry Pratchett 1998
Visit the MaVerick web-site - http://www.maverick-dbms.org Open Source Pick
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


[U2] -1 and Null values

2010-05-02 Thread Dan McGrath
Hi all,

 

Hopefully I'm not going crazy, but I could have sworn in UD 7.1 that
doing a -1 to append an empty string would not actually appended
anything. For example:

 

REC = 'A'

REC-1 = ''

 

Would result in REC equaling 'A', not 'A':@AM

 

In fact, I even have some in-house tools I wrote that rely on -1
trimming out empty strings. Now, it appears in UD 7.2.5 that this is no
longer the case and it does equal 'A':@AM. I've been through all the
release notes and cannot see any changes that would have affected this.
I've also looked through all the UDT.OPTIONS and see nothing relevant...

 

Am I going crazy or has this indeed changed?

 

Cheers,

Dan

 

 


###
The information transmitted in this message and attachments (if any) is 
intended only
for the person or entity to which it is addressed. The message may contain 
confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other 
use of
or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or 
entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited.  If you received this in error, 
please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

The intended recipient of this e-mail may only use, reproduce, disclose or 
distribute
the information contained in this e-mail and any attached files with the 
permission of IMB.
###
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] -1 and Null values

2010-05-02 Thread Kate Stanton

Hi Dan,

You are not the crazy one.  It changed some years ago (UniVerse anyway) - we 
found out the hard way.


That and the user number not being the user number for phantom (ie client) 
users have caused a great deal of heartache for us.


Scary thing is what else might change!  We avoid use of NOT() when data 
might be alpha, in case that changes to give runtime error.


Kate Stanton
Walstan Systems Ltd
4 Kelmarna Ave, Herne Bay, Auckland 1011, New Zealand
Ph: +64 9 360 5310  Fax: +64 9 376 0750  Mobile: +64 21 400 486
Email: k...@walstan.com

- Original Message - 
From: Dan McGrath dmc...@imb.com.au

To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 5:35 PM
Subject: [U2] -1 and Null values



Hi all,



Hopefully I'm not going crazy, but I could have sworn in UD 7.1 that
doing a -1 to append an empty string would not actually appended
anything. For example:



REC = 'A'

REC-1 = ''



Would result in REC equaling 'A', not 'A':@AM



In fact, I even have some in-house tools I wrote that rely on -1
trimming out empty strings. Now, it appears in UD 7.2.5 that this is no
longer the case and it does equal 'A':@AM. I've been through all the
release notes and cannot see any changes that would have affected this.
I've also looked through all the UDT.OPTIONS and see nothing relevant...



Am I going crazy or has this indeed changed?



Cheers,

Dan






###
The information transmitted in this message and attachments (if any) is 
intended only
for the person or entity to which it is addressed. The message may contain 
confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or 
other use of
or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or 
entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited.  If you received this in error, 
please

contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

The intended recipient of this e-mail may only use, reproduce, disclose or 
distribute
the information contained in this e-mail and any attached files with the 
permission of IMB.

###
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users 


___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] 1 - 4 Years

2007-07-02 Thread john reid

OUCH!
Probably not without looking at the manual though..
:-)

On 6/29/07, MAJ Programming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Aside from the historical rambling, your question on LOCATE can be easily
answered tenfold by the persons on this forum.

Mark Johnson
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 2:38 PM
Subject: RE: [U2] 1 - 4 Years


 I resemble that comment (Pick Aware 2003).

 As a side note:  Early in our test/evaluation, our software vendor
 salesperson had said that the database system used by the application was
 Informix.

 Oh Yeah, that sounds familiar. I took some sailing classes in the San
 Francisco Bay with a gal that worked at Informix.

 So needless to say that I spent about 3 months on the IIUG.org list-serv.
I
 even hired a Informix consultant to help get our Web application hooked
up
 to our new application software's database via ODBC.

 After about 3 hours of mucking about on our system, the consultant
reported
 back that:
 In an attempt to assess the Informix installation I looked around
 on the machine for the location of the normal Informix tools and
 configurations.  I found none of them.  I called Mr. Smith and he ran me
 though some of his standard commands and locations that he uses with the
 application.  This was when I found a Universe system, which has an
Informix
 copyright but I was unfamiliar with the product.  I made several phone
calls
 and did some investigations and got understand the basis of the product.

 Universe is a tool acquired when Informix obtained (I believe)
 DataStage from a third party.  Universe is its own database system based
 upon the Pick Database system.  Universe is a flat file pseudo relational
 database system but allows multi-values within fields.  Universe does
allow
 ODBC and JDBC connections but certain field types require some translation
 to be correctly transferred.  Universe does not follow any of the standard
 Informix conventions and does not use the same configuration files and
 Charles McMurray should seek out a Universe Consultant to help with their
 ODBC problem.  IBM did acquire all the rights to Universe with the
purchase
 of Informix and does state that it supports Universe.

 So I say to myself what the heck is Universe? So what is a newbie to do?
 But, Google it - which leads to some guy Cliff Olivier and sites in
 Australia.
 I get in touch with Janet Oswald and some of her group. And finally I
found
 this fledging users group u2ug.org that was just getting going and the
rest
 is history. About one month later I got hooked up with a group out of Los
 Angeles [AdvancedWare] that saved the day, in getting us technical
 training(Unix, MV, Universe, DICT, I-desc, getting the ODBC hooked up,
 etc..).

 About a year later after numerous pleadings, demands, etc .., we got
 technical training on our Eclipse Enterpise Software application. Those
 Intuit-Eclipse software developers think they are guarding the Crown
Jewels
 (or are southern border patrol .. I got in anyway .. Amigos). They are
more
 of an impedment than help. It is a great system they wrote and works
really
 well. But, since it was originally written by some hackers in a garage, I
 guess they do not have any documentation on the system (dig.. Dig...
prove
 my wrong Denver Dudes).

 Ok so now I have about 4 years on U2 and still trying to get to know the
 difference in LOCATE x in MVvs   LOCATE x in MV1,1 returns what?
 I think I have figured out how to read an product item that is on
backorder
 from the convoluted MV design on the order entry system.

  Probably this is the same path followed by many U2  newbies.  --
I
 hope not 

 Garry L. Smith
 Dir Info Systems
 Charles McMurray Company
 V# 559-292-5782   F# 559-346-6169

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] On Behalf Of Charles Barouch
 Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 10:03 AM
 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 Subject: Re: [U2] [AD] UniVerse Programmer needed in New Jersey

 Ron,
Actually, I train new programmers. The problem is that most new people
 don;t know there's a community, so we don't meet them. There's actually a
 lot of new blood. We just have to find them and invite them inside.

 - Chuck

 Ron Hutchings wrote:
 Has anyone actually run across someone with only 1-5 years
experience?
 ---
 u2-users mailing list
 u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/




--
john
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] 1 - 4 Years

2007-06-29 Thread GarryS
I resemble that comment (Pick Aware 2003).

As a side note:  Early in our test/evaluation, our software vendor
salesperson had said that the database system used by the application was
Informix.  

Oh Yeah, that sounds familiar. I took some sailing classes in the San
Francisco Bay with a gal that worked at Informix.

So needless to say that I spent about 3 months on the IIUG.org list-serv. I
even hired a Informix consultant to help get our Web application hooked up
to our new application software's database via ODBC.

After about 3 hours of mucking about on our system, the consultant reported
back that:
In an attempt to assess the Informix installation I looked around
on the machine for the location of the normal Informix tools and
configurations.  I found none of them.  I called Mr. Smith and he ran me
though some of his standard commands and locations that he uses with the
application.  This was when I found a Universe system, which has an Informix
copyright but I was unfamiliar with the product.  I made several phone calls
and did some investigations and got understand the basis of the product.
 
Universe is a tool acquired when Informix obtained (I believe)
DataStage from a third party.  Universe is its own database system based
upon the Pick Database system.  Universe is a flat file pseudo relational
database system but allows multi-values within fields.  Universe does allow
ODBC and JDBC connections but certain field types require some translation
to be correctly transferred.  Universe does not follow any of the standard
Informix conventions and does not use the same configuration files and
Charles McMurray should seek out a Universe Consultant to help with their
ODBC problem.  IBM did acquire all the rights to Universe with the purchase
of Informix and does state that it supports Universe.

So I say to myself what the heck is Universe? So what is a newbie to do?
But, Google it - which leads to some guy Cliff Olivier and sites in
Australia.
I get in touch with Janet Oswald and some of her group. And finally I found
this fledging users group u2ug.org that was just getting going and the rest
is history. About one month later I got hooked up with a group out of Los
Angeles [AdvancedWare] that saved the day, in getting us technical
training(Unix, MV, Universe, DICT, I-desc, getting the ODBC hooked up,
etc..). 

About a year later after numerous pleadings, demands, etc .., we got
technical training on our Eclipse Enterpise Software application. Those
Intuit-Eclipse software developers think they are guarding the Crown Jewels
(or are southern border patrol .. I got in anyway .. Amigos). They are more
of an impedment than help. It is a great system they wrote and works really
well. But, since it was originally written by some hackers in a garage, I
guess they do not have any documentation on the system (dig.. Dig...  prove
my wrong Denver Dudes). 

Ok so now I have about 4 years on U2 and still trying to get to know the
difference in LOCATE x in MVvs   LOCATE x in MV1,1 returns what?
I think I have figured out how to read an product item that is on backorder
from the convoluted MV design on the order entry system.

 Probably this is the same path followed by many U2  newbies.  -- I
hope not 

Garry L. Smith
Dir Info Systems
Charles McMurray Company
V# 559-292-5782   F# 559-346-6169

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] On Behalf Of Charles Barouch
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 10:03 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] [AD] UniVerse Programmer needed in New Jersey

Ron,
   Actually, I train new programmers. The problem is that most new people
don;t know there's a community, so we don't meet them. There's actually a
lot of new blood. We just have to find them and invite them inside.

- Chuck

Ron Hutchings wrote:
Has anyone actually run across someone with only 1-5 years experience?
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] 1 - 4 Years

2007-06-29 Thread MAJ Programming
Aside from the historical rambling, your question on LOCATE can be easily
answered tenfold by the persons on this forum.

Mark Johnson
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 2:38 PM
Subject: RE: [U2] 1 - 4 Years


 I resemble that comment (Pick Aware 2003).

 As a side note:  Early in our test/evaluation, our software vendor
 salesperson had said that the database system used by the application was
 Informix.

 Oh Yeah, that sounds familiar. I took some sailing classes in the San
 Francisco Bay with a gal that worked at Informix.

 So needless to say that I spent about 3 months on the IIUG.org list-serv.
I
 even hired a Informix consultant to help get our Web application hooked
up
 to our new application software's database via ODBC.

 After about 3 hours of mucking about on our system, the consultant
reported
 back that:
 In an attempt to assess the Informix installation I looked around
 on the machine for the location of the normal Informix tools and
 configurations.  I found none of them.  I called Mr. Smith and he ran me
 though some of his standard commands and locations that he uses with the
 application.  This was when I found a Universe system, which has an
Informix
 copyright but I was unfamiliar with the product.  I made several phone
calls
 and did some investigations and got understand the basis of the product.

 Universe is a tool acquired when Informix obtained (I believe)
 DataStage from a third party.  Universe is its own database system based
 upon the Pick Database system.  Universe is a flat file pseudo relational
 database system but allows multi-values within fields.  Universe does
allow
 ODBC and JDBC connections but certain field types require some translation
 to be correctly transferred.  Universe does not follow any of the standard
 Informix conventions and does not use the same configuration files and
 Charles McMurray should seek out a Universe Consultant to help with their
 ODBC problem.  IBM did acquire all the rights to Universe with the
purchase
 of Informix and does state that it supports Universe.

 So I say to myself what the heck is Universe? So what is a newbie to do?
 But, Google it - which leads to some guy Cliff Olivier and sites in
 Australia.
 I get in touch with Janet Oswald and some of her group. And finally I
found
 this fledging users group u2ug.org that was just getting going and the
rest
 is history. About one month later I got hooked up with a group out of Los
 Angeles [AdvancedWare] that saved the day, in getting us technical
 training(Unix, MV, Universe, DICT, I-desc, getting the ODBC hooked up,
 etc..).

 About a year later after numerous pleadings, demands, etc .., we got
 technical training on our Eclipse Enterpise Software application. Those
 Intuit-Eclipse software developers think they are guarding the Crown
Jewels
 (or are southern border patrol .. I got in anyway .. Amigos). They are
more
 of an impedment than help. It is a great system they wrote and works
really
 well. But, since it was originally written by some hackers in a garage, I
 guess they do not have any documentation on the system (dig.. Dig...
prove
 my wrong Denver Dudes).

 Ok so now I have about 4 years on U2 and still trying to get to know the
 difference in LOCATE x in MVvs   LOCATE x in MV1,1 returns what?
 I think I have figured out how to read an product item that is on
backorder
 from the convoluted MV design on the order entry system.

  Probably this is the same path followed by many U2  newbies.  --
I
 hope not 

 Garry L. Smith
 Dir Info Systems
 Charles McMurray Company
 V# 559-292-5782   F# 559-346-6169

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] On Behalf Of Charles Barouch
 Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 10:03 AM
 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 Subject: Re: [U2] [AD] UniVerse Programmer needed in New Jersey

 Ron,
Actually, I train new programmers. The problem is that most new people
 don;t know there's a community, so we don't meet them. There's actually a
 lot of new blood. We just have to find them and invite them inside.

 - Chuck

 Ron Hutchings wrote:
 Has anyone actually run across someone with only 1-5 years
experience?
 ---
 u2-users mailing list
 u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/