Re: [U2] UV SEARCH Bug?

2008-01-17 Thread Ken Hall

Kevin -
Did you move the file to this system from another one? If so, it may 
have been created with LONGNAMES on or off and your current setting 
for LONGNAMES is the other choice. I had this same problem on another 
system where I restored the account with uvrestore and had to remove 
the .Type1 record from the directory to get things working again, 
ie. a directory without the .Type 1 item is a Type 19 file.  Also, 
if you did a restore, did you run UPDATE.ACCOUNT in the account; it 
fixes lots of problems that occur with moved accounts.


Ken

At 03:41 PM 1/16/2008, you wrote:

I am working on a UV 10.2 system and the BP file is a Type 1.  SEARCH
BP and then entering a string that is known to be in the records
returns erroneous results.  For example:

 SEARCH BP
STRING: KK
STRING: cr

5 record(s) selected to SELECT list #0.

CLEARSELECT
SELECT list number 0 cleared.

SELECT BP

935 record(s) selected to SELECT list #0.
 SEARCH BP
STRING: KK
STRING: cr

48 record(s) selected to SELECT list #0.


Why would the SEARCH with no active list return 5 but the SEARCH with
the active list returned 48 items?  Copying the records to a type 19
file, the SEARCH works fine on the type 19 file.  It only seems to be
with the type 1.  Any clues?

-Kevin
http://www.PrecisOnline.com
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] UV SEARCH Bug?

2008-01-17 Thread Jerry Banker
My guess would be that when a search is performed on a type 1 file,
without a select list, it reads the file names and some may have been
split by the name truncation used with type 1 files. With an active
select list the search routine probably uses the select list which has
the full concatenated name. A type 19 file wouldn't have the same
problem because it does not split the long names.

Jerry Banker
Senior Programmer Analyst
IBM Certified Solutions Expert
Affiliated Acceptance Corp
Sunrise Beach, MO
1-800-233-8483
www.affiliated.org


 -Original Message-
 From: Kevin King [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 5:42 PM
 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 Subject: [U2] UV SEARCH Bug?
 
 I am working on a UV 10.2 system and the BP file is a Type 1.  SEARCH
 BP and then entering a string that is known to be in the records
 returns erroneous results.  For example:
 
  SEARCH BP
 STRING: KK
 STRING: cr
 
 5 record(s) selected to SELECT list #0.
 
 CLEARSELECT
 SELECT list number 0 cleared.
 
 SELECT BP
 
 935 record(s) selected to SELECT list #0.
  SEARCH BP
 STRING: KK
 STRING: cr
 
 48 record(s) selected to SELECT list #0.
 
 
 Why would the SEARCH with no active list return 5 but the SEARCH with
 the active list returned 48 items?  Copying the records to a type 19
 file, the SEARCH works fine on the type 19 file.  It only seems to be
 with the type 1.  Any clues?
 
 -Kevin
 http://www.PrecisOnline.com
 ---
 u2-users mailing list
 u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] UV SEARCH Bug?

2008-01-16 Thread iggchamp
I ran into this some time ago.  I think it was a permissions issue.  Once 
search runs into a record that you don't have permissions to, it just stops and 
returns what it has found up to that point.  Hope that's it.

-- Original message -- 
From: Kevin King [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 I am working on a UV 10.2 system and the BP file is a Type 1. SEARCH 
 BP and then entering a string that is known to be in the records 
 returns erroneous results. For example: 
 
  SEARCH BP 
 STRING: KK 
 STRING: 
 
 5 record(s) selected to SELECT list #0. 
 
 CLEARSELECT 
 SELECT list number 0 cleared. 
 
 SELECT BP 
 
 935 record(s) selected to SELECT list #0. 
  SEARCH BP 
 STRING: KK 
 STRING: 
 
 48 record(s) selected to SELECT list #0. 
  
 
 Why would the SEARCH with no active list return 5 but the SEARCH with 
 the active list returned 48 items? Copying the records to a type 19 
 file, the SEARCH works fine on the type 19 file. It only seems to be 
 with the type 1. Any clues? 
 
 -Kevin 
 http://www.PrecisOnline.com 
 --- 
 u2-users mailing list 
 u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org 
 To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ 
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/