Help wanted - Avante Configurator
This is not strictly U2 specific but I believe it is close enough to = justify a posting. My client is looking for some help with Avante Configurator. This is a special skill which is not exactly coding but does require detailed knowledge and experience of this part of the Avante ERP = offering. It is likely that some readers may know of likely candidates. The position will be in New Jersey and be of two or three month=92s = duration. The client is looking for implementation and setup of the configurator = plus some training in its use. Further details upon application to: John Rodgers Rodgers Consulting Inc Cell: 678 5223622 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.642 / Virus Database: 410 - Release Date: 3/24/2004 -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: callHTTP
Just wanted to thank everyone for their responses. I am tied up with some other things right now, but will be looking into all the options mentioned in a few days. When we resolve the issue, I will post the resolution to the list for future reference. Thanks again, Mike Dallaire Mortgage Builder Software Inc. (248) 208-3223 ext. 103 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anthony Youngman Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 4:06 AM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: RE: callHTTP Don't forget also, there are standards that define what should go down the wire when talking over the network. I think those standards say that the correct sequence for end of line is crlf. Because printers were usually controlled down a wire, and they assumed cr meant cr and lf meant lf. Cheers, Wol -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Bennett Sent: 06 April 2004 00:43 To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: Re: callHTTP Hi Mike, UniVerse sockets will not strip CRLF. Attached is some old code I used to do HTTP requests for a screen scraping thing I was trying out when I couldn't get CALLHTTP to work as I expected. No promises that it will work, I haven't touched it in a while. I posted a trimmed version of this code on the list a few years ago. Craig This transmission is intended for the named recipient only. It may contain private and confidential information. If this has come to you in error you must not act on anything disclosed in it, nor must you copy it, modify it, disseminate it in any way, or show it to anyone. Please e-mail the sender to inform us of the transmission error or telephone ECA International immediately and delete the e-mail from your information system. Telephone numbers for ECA International offices are: Sydney +61 (0)2 9911 7799, Hong Kong + 852 2121 2388, London +44 (0)20 7351 5000 and New York +1 212 582 2333. -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: Memo: Re: UV: How do I determine whether a file is using 64bitor 32 bit addressing
Does anyone have the magic settings for UniData 6/Unix files? -Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Logan, David (SST - Adelaide) Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 1:09 AM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: RE: Memo: Re: UV: How do I determine whether a file is using 64bitor 32 bit addressing Hi Clif, These 3 or 4 lines I worked out myself (it looks small and simple but it took me a while) and then Glenn H. contributed the rest of the data below. I use it for running a script every night that checks on the size of the files and will alert us to any file growing over 1.5Gb so we can ensure it is included in the next resize. This has saved our bacon a few times now although due credit to FAST as it will automagically resize the file to a 64bit once it reaches that limit. You could change the output (eg. the Universe 32 Bit description) to anything you wish. Glenns version is far more comprehensive but I only have one version of universe to worry about. I use it $ file -m /usr/local/etc/magic * The output being SAVEDLISTS: directory BP: directory BP.O: directory D_SAVEDLISTS: Universe 32 Bit D_BP: Universe 32 Bit D_BP.O: Universe 32 Bit D_MYTEST: Universe 32 Bit D_RESULT: Universe 32 Bit D_TEST: Universe 32 Bit D_VOC: Universe 32 Bit D_VOCLIB: Universe 32 Bit MYTEST: Universe 32 Bit RESULT: directory STUFF: commands text TEST: Universe 64 bit -- VOC:Universe 32 Bit -- VOC.bak:Universe 32 Bit VOCLIB: Universe 32 Bit W360LIVE: ascii text bin:directory fast.tar: data man:directory rcmd.log: empty rcopy.conf: ascii text save_key_files.ksh: /bin/ksh script update.hpadmin: /usr/bin/ksh script Regards # #offset typeoperator+value string to print # Universe files # 2 short 0xacef Universe 0 short 0x010c 32 Bit 0 short 0x020c 64 bit The next few lines were from Glenn Herbert via the list sometime ago (9th of Jan 2003). The magic file I set up and use for all the various universe data file types is as follows (note that this file does NOT support 64BIT files, but could be readily done): start of magic file=== # # UniVerse magic file # 0 short 0xacef uniVerse file (unix:class8) 2 short 0x0104 v0104(4.3.1) 2 short 0x0105 v0105(5.3.1) 2 short 0x0106 v0106(6.3.4) 2 short 0x0107 v0107(7.3.1) 2 short 0x0108 v0108(7.3.2) 2 short 0x0109 v0109(8.3.1) 2 short 0x010a v010a(9.3.1) 2 short 0x010b v010b(9.3.2) 2 short 0x010c v010c(9.5.1) 4 long0 type %d 12long0 mod %d 16long0 sep %d # # Note that mod sep are incorrect for values 256 due to byte ordering # 0 short 0xefac uniVerse file (xinu:class2) 2 short 0x0401 v0104(4.3.1) 2 short 0x0501 v0105(5.3.1) 2 short 0x0601 v0106(6.3.4) 2 short 0x0701 v0107(7.3.1) 2 short 0x0801 v0108(7.3.2) 2 short 0x0901 v0109(8.3.1) 2 short 0x0a01 v010a(9.3.1) 2 short 0x0b01 v010b(9.3.2) 2 short 0x0c01 v010c(9.5.1) 6 byte0 mod %d 10byte0 sep %d 14byte0 type %d # # new class # 2 short 0xacef uniVerse file (ixun:class1) 0 short 0x0104 v0104(4.3.1) 0 short 0x0105 v0105(5.3.1) 0 short 0x0106 v0106(6.3.4) 0 short 0x0107 v0107(7.3.1) 0 short 0x0108 v0108(7.3.2) 0 short 0x0109 v0109(8.3.1) 0 short 0x010a v010a(9.3.1) 0 short 0x010b v010b(9.3.2) 0 short 0x010c v010c(9.5.1) 4 long0 mod %d 8 long0 sep %d 12long0 type %d # # Note that mod sep are incorrect for values 256 due to byte ordering # 2 short 0xefac uniVerse file (ixnu:class1a) 0 short 0x0401 v0104(4.3.1) 0 short 0x0501 v0105(5.3.1) 0 short 0x0601 v0106(6.3.4) 0 short 0x0701 v0107(7.3.1) 0 short 0x0801 v0108(7.3.2) 0 short 0x0901 v0109(8.3.1) 0 short 0x0a01 v010a(9.3.1) 0 short 0x0b01 v010b(9.3.2) 0 short 0x0c01 v010c(9.5.1) 4 byte0 mod %d 8 byte0 sep %d 12byte0 type %d # # # Describe object code - class 8 # 0 short 0xace0 BASIC PROG pcode object (unix:class8) 2 short 0 rev %x 0 short 0xace1 BASIC SUBR pcode object (unix:class8) 2 short 0 rev %x 10short 0 (No args) 10short
RE: SAN's and Unidata
We use Hitachi SAN's and Solaris 8. We have one SAN for our production box in Conn. And a second SAN for our failover/development box in Minnesota. Production has about 800 users on in Prime time. We are also using RFS, but keep the log files for RFS on local drives. Performance is good most days. And when we have performance issues, it is tough to put a finger on. There are a lot of components involved besides the Hitachi's. We have RFS, Veritas, the WAN, routers, Web access, Voice access, the Hitachi, Solaris, Unidata and who knows what I have forgotten. Anyone of these can be a bottleneck. But that said, we are very happy with the Hitachi. - Rod -Original Message- From: Martin Thorpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 7:27 AM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: SAN's and Unidata Hi all Slightly off topic, but I wondered how many of you house your Unidata applications on a SAN (Storage Area Network), ours is housed on a LSI based SAN made up of two arrays. What kind of performance do you observe? Any replies would be appreciated. I will summarise if people reply directly to me. Thanks -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [UV] READ READU on a part file belonging to a Distributed file
At 09:32 PM 04/06/2004, you wrote: Under Universe if I attempt to read a record (using READ) from a part file but using a key which actually maps (via the partitioning algorithm) to a different part file - then the READ just takes the ELSE clause without setting STATUS() to anything. Because within the run machine, a plain old READ just simply tries to read the record id out of the file you passed in. The run machine Fread function, calls DBread, which then calls the low level DBfind routine, which will simply not locate the record in the group it should belong in and (internally) returns a 7 back up to the run machine Fread function. Unfortunately, the Fread code won't set STATUS for a 7 (looks like a coding deficiency). I'm assuming that universe code still looks fairly much the same here. Altering the program to use READU instead of READ and the ELSE clause is still taken - but this time STATUS() is set to 2. Knowing how READ works, READU believe it or not, works slightly differently. The Freadu function calls DBreadLock, which actually DOES check to see if you are working within a partfile. If you are, then it makes certain that the key you want actually should exist in the file. If it does, then dandy. If not, it (internally) returns a 37 back up to the Freadu code, which correctly sets the STATUS based on that. Looking in the Universe Basic manual I can't find mention of what a STATUS() value of 2 means in relation to a READU statement (although it does say -2 (negative 2) signifies the part number is invalid. I checked ED.B and COPY.B in the uv BP file, and both of these programs specifically check for a STATUS() value of 1 or 2 after doing a READU and then display an appropriate error message relating to part files and distributed files. 1 = bad partfile algorithm 2 = no part file / not in partfile 3 = unmappable record id (NLS only) 4 = unmappable record data (NLS only) What I can't understand is why the READ (without setting a lock) doesn't return the same STATUS(). How am I supposed to determine that the reason the record wasn't found was due to key being invalid and not just because it didn't exist? Now you know why. Hope this helps. -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: SAN's and Unidata
Hi Rod Sounds good, and here's us thinking we were one of a small minority using Unidata on a SAN. Did you notice that there isnt alot of room to maneuvar in terms of clustering! We also have two arrays, both of which are active but able to cover each other. VxVM is used as yourselves, we also run various OS functions, webservers, SQL farms etc. What model Hitachi array are you using? Is it one of the Thunder style models? Anyone else? Baakkonen, Rodney wrote: We use Hitachi SAN's and Solaris 8. We have one SAN for our production box in Conn. And a second SAN for our failover/development box in Minnesota. Production has about 800 users on in Prime time. We are also using RFS, but keep the log files for RFS on local drives. Performance is good most days. And when we have performance issues, it is tough to put a finger on. There are a lot of components involved besides the Hitachi's. We have RFS, Veritas, the WAN, routers, Web access, Voice access, the Hitachi, Solaris, Unidata and who knows what I have forgotten. Anyone of these can be a bottleneck. But that said, we are very happy with the Hitachi. - Rod -Original Message- From: Martin Thorpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 7:27 AM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: SAN's and Unidata Hi all Slightly off topic, but I wondered how many of you house your Unidata applications on a SAN (Storage Area Network), ours is housed on a LSI based SAN made up of two arrays. What kind of performance do you observe? Any replies would be appreciated. I will summarise if people reply directly to me. Thanks -- Martin Thorpe DATAFORCE GROUP LTD DDI: 01604 673886 MOBILE: 07740598932 WEB: http://www.dataforce.co.uk mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
UniVerse and RedBack
I was not sure whether to make this an '[OT]', so if it is deserving of such status, forgive me. We are running UniVerse 10.0.19. We are running RedBack ver 4.1.3. We seem to be having a problem where our Responders go busy and never return to idle. Eventually all Responders go busy and our web 'goes down'. The log files show nothing that would even raise an eyebrow of uncertainty. It is as if, RedBack is running great and then it ain't. Some scenarios that might cause this would at least give us some areas to investigate for problems. Any thoughts as always are much appreciated. Thank you, Barry Rogen Senior Programmer PNY Technologies (973) 515 - 9700 ext 5327 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ The quality of a person's life is in direct proportion to their commitment to excellence regardless of their chosen field of endeavor vince lombardi _ -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: UniVerse and RedBack
If you do a PORT.STATUS USER on your redback user can you see what the responders are doing? Sounds like they're running garbage collect to me. -Original Message- From: Barry Rogen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 April 2004 15:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: UniVerse and RedBack I was not sure whether to make this an '[OT]', so if it is deserving of such status, forgive me. We are running UniVerse 10.0.19. We are running RedBack ver 4.1.3. We seem to be having a problem where our Responders go busy and never return to idle. Eventually all Responders go busy and our web 'goes down'. The log files show nothing that would even raise an eyebrow of uncertainty. It is as if, RedBack is running great and then it ain't. Some scenarios that might cause this would at least give us some areas to investigate for problems. Any thoughts as always are much appreciated. Thank you, Barry Rogen Senior Programmer PNY Technologies (973) 515 - 9700 ext 5327 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ The quality of a person's life is in direct proportion to their commitment to excellence regardless of their chosen field of endeavor vince lombardi _ -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ** The contents of this e-mail are subject to contract in all cases and William Hill PLC, its subsidiaries or affiliates make no contractual commitment save where confirmed by hard copy. The contents of this e-mail do not necessarily represent the views of William Hill PLC, its subsidiaries or affiliates. We accept no liability, including liability for negligence, in respect of any statement in this e-mail. This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential, may be subject to legal privilege and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately, then delete this e-mail. Please note that William Hill can accept no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan any emails and their attachments. This message was from William Hill PLC whose registered office is Greenside House, 50 Station Road, Wood Green, London N22 7TP. Company Registration Number: 4212563 England. ** -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Subroutine string manipulation not doing what expected
Given the following snippet of code: FOR PLC = 1 TO PART.LIST.COUNT SEARCH.VALUE = DESC.LISTPLC RETURN.VALUE := SEARCH.VALUE : @VM NEXT PLC ROLLSTOCK=RETURN.VALUE I get the following output: P337 P RPVC 0200x20.00 TNT201 P BOX 19:08 15:08 13:08 BX PLAC 20:08 15:08 11:14 However, a simple change to the code to only add a few digits of DESC.LISTPLC like so: FOR PLC = 1 TO PART.LIST.COUNT SEARCH.VALUE = DESC.LISTPLC IF SEARCH.VALUE[1,1]='*' THEN SEARCH.VALUE = SEARCH.VALUE[4,4] END ELSE SEARCH.VALUE = SEARCH.VALUE[3,4] END RETURN.VALUE := SEARCH.VALUE : @VM NEXT PLC ROLLSTOCK=RETURN.VALUE I get the following outupt...not what I was expecting: 37 P My intention is to grab 4 characters out of DESC.LISTPLC, starting at character 4 if the string starts with an asterix or 3 if it doesn't. Can anyone see what I'm doing wrong here? Thanks. -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: Subroutine string manipulation not doing what expected
It looks like sometime between the first iteration and the second, the PART.LIST.COUNT went from 4 to 1. Put a display of that variable before the loop, to verify its value. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 9:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Subroutine string manipulation not doing what expected Given the following snippet of code: FOR PLC = 1 TO PART.LIST.COUNT SEARCH.VALUE = DESC.LISTPLC RETURN.VALUE := SEARCH.VALUE : @VM NEXT PLC ROLLSTOCK=RETURN.VALUE I get the following output: P337 P RPVC 0200x20.00 TNT201 P BOX 19:08 15:08 13:08 BX PLAC 20:08 15:08 11:14 However, a simple change to the code to only add a few digits of DESC.LISTPLC like so: FOR PLC = 1 TO PART.LIST.COUNT SEARCH.VALUE = DESC.LISTPLC IF SEARCH.VALUE[1,1]='*' THEN SEARCH.VALUE = SEARCH.VALUE[4,4] END ELSE SEARCH.VALUE = SEARCH.VALUE[3,4] END RETURN.VALUE := SEARCH.VALUE : @VM NEXT PLC ROLLSTOCK=RETURN.VALUE I get the following outupt...not what I was expecting: 37 P My intention is to grab 4 characters out of DESC.LISTPLC, starting at character 4 if the string starts with an asterix or 3 if it doesn't. Can anyone see what I'm doing wrong here? Thanks. -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: Subroutine string manipulation not doing what expected
Also - I don't see the 'DISPLAY' as part of this code snip -- the reason I ask - if the output is bring displayed later in the program, could something else be happening later in the program than this snip that also looks at the ROLLSTOCK and also parses it in some way? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 9:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Subroutine string manipulation not doing what expected Given the following snippet of code: FOR PLC = 1 TO PART.LIST.COUNT SEARCH.VALUE = DESC.LISTPLC RETURN.VALUE := SEARCH.VALUE : @VM NEXT PLC ROLLSTOCK=RETURN.VALUE I get the following output: P337 P RPVC 0200x20.00 TNT201 P BOX 19:08 15:08 13:08 BX PLAC 20:08 15:08 11:14 However, a simple change to the code to only add a few digits of DESC.LISTPLC like so: FOR PLC = 1 TO PART.LIST.COUNT SEARCH.VALUE = DESC.LISTPLC IF SEARCH.VALUE[1,1]='*' THEN SEARCH.VALUE = SEARCH.VALUE[4,4] END ELSE SEARCH.VALUE = SEARCH.VALUE[3,4] END RETURN.VALUE := SEARCH.VALUE : @VM NEXT PLC ROLLSTOCK=RETURN.VALUE I get the following outupt...not what I was expecting: 37 P My intention is to grab 4 characters out of DESC.LISTPLC, starting at character 4 if the string starts with an asterix or 3 if it doesn't. Can anyone see what I'm doing wrong here? Thanks. -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: [UV] MCP
if you consider a space a printable character then seq(32) to seq(126) would be printable so IF SEQ(YOURVAR) 31 AND SEQ(YOURVAR) 127 THEN ITS.PRINTABLE = 1 -Original Message- From: Craig Bennett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 5:36 PM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: [UV] MCP Hi All, does anyone know how I can determine which characters are in the non-printable class on a NON-NLS system? We are runing uv 10.0. Thanks, Craig -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: UniVerse and RedBack
To be painfully honest, I have not checked the actual 'PORT.STATUS'. I shall wait (not too long) for the next event. Barry Rogen Senior Programmer PNY Technologies (973) 515 - 9700 ext 5327 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ The quality of a person's life is in direct proportion to their commitment to excellence regardless of their chosen field of endeavor vince lombardi _ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Cowell Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 10:21 AM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: RE: UniVerse and RedBack If you do a PORT.STATUS USER on your redback user can you see what the responders are doing? Sounds like they're running garbage collect to me. -Original Message- From: Barry Rogen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 April 2004 15:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: UniVerse and RedBack I was not sure whether to make this an '[OT]', so if it is deserving of such status, forgive me. We are running UniVerse 10.0.19. We are running RedBack ver 4.1.3. We seem to be having a problem where our Responders go busy and never return to idle. Eventually all Responders go busy and our web 'goes down'. The log files show nothing that would even raise an eyebrow of uncertainty. It is as if, RedBack is running great and then it ain't. Some scenarios that might cause this would at least give us some areas to investigate for problems. Any thoughts as always are much appreciated. Thank you, Barry Rogen Senior Programmer PNY Technologies (973) 515 - 9700 ext 5327 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ The quality of a person's life is in direct proportion to their commitment to excellence regardless of their chosen field of endeavor vince lombardi _ -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ** The contents of this e-mail are subject to contract in all cases and William Hill PLC, its subsidiaries or affiliates make no contractual commitment save where confirmed by hard copy. The contents of this e-mail do not necessarily represent the views of William Hill PLC, its subsidiaries or affiliates. We accept no liability, including liability for negligence, in respect of any statement in this e-mail. This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential, may be subject to legal privilege and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately, then delete this e-mail. Please note that William Hill can accept no responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan any emails and their attachments. This message was from William Hill PLC whose registered office is Greenside House, 50 Station Road, Wood Green, London N22 7TP. Company Registration Number: 4212563 England. ** -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: U2 Personal Editions
I believe one problem was either there wasn't unzip or there wasn't gunzip. I changed one to the other. I believe I changed all the references to unzip to gunzip, then it worked. George -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 2:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: U2 Personal Editions I'm trying to install UV and UD Personal Editions. I had an old download of UVPE and am trying to install it. Once upon a time i remember someone mentioning what needed to be changed in uv.load to install it on a non-Redhat system (Debian in my case), but i can't find it in the archives. Anyone know? Alas, i no longer have broadband and the UD download took about 8-10 hours and didn't quite finish. I got 67.1 MB of the 68.2MB of rhlinux71_601PE.tar.gz. Thought i'd try to install it anyway and it almost worked. The server loads and presumably is running ok, but when i try to start the client, i get a message saying the sys/VOC file is version 5.0 and needs to be 6.0. Presumably updatevoc would fix this, but, alas, it appears the files are in alphabetical order and the extraction bombs out in the uojskd directory. Since the download is https, i assume there's no way to use something like wget to resume the download. I have to pay by the minute for internet here in Zambia, so i hate to try to download the whole thing again if i don't have to since the same thing could happen again. Of course the easiest thing would be for someone to send me a gzipped tarball of everything that extracts from uojsdk/lib onward. I really don't think IBM would mind, but in these lawsuit happy days, i understand most people wouldn't want to do this. Just wondering if there are any other options? TIA, Charles -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: U2 Personal Editions
The only note I have from an install is that you need to edit the install script and change the '/cdrom' to '/mnt/cdrom'. That was true for my install on Red Hat. That may or may not be correct for your system. My entire instruction was Iistall CD login as root mount /mnt/cdrom cpio -ivcBdum /mnt/cdrom/startup (uv.load 20 blocks appear on screen) ./uv.load Then follow the bouncing ball Anthony Dzikiewicz -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 2:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:U2 Personal Editions I'm trying to install UV and UD Personal Editions. I had an old download of UVPE and am trying to install it. Once upon a time i remember someone mentioning what needed to be changed in uv.load to install it on a non-Redhat system (Debian in my case), but i can't find it in the archives. Anyone know? Alas, i no longer have broadband and the UD download took about 8-10 hours and didn't quite finish. I got 67.1 MB of the 68.2MB of rhlinux71_601PE.tar.gz. Thought i'd try to install it anyway and it almost worked. The server loads and presumably is running ok, but when i try to start the client, i get a message saying the sys/VOC file is version 5.0 and needs to be 6.0. Presumably updatevoc would fix this, but, alas, it appears the files are in alphabetical order and the extraction bombs out in the uojskd directory. Since the download is https, i assume there's no way to use something like wget to resume the download. I have to pay by the minute for internet here in Zambia, so i hate to try to download the whole thing again if i don't have to since the same thing could happen again. Of course the easiest thing would be for someone to send me a gzipped tarball of everything that extracts from uojsdk/lib onward. I really don't think IBM would mind, but in these lawsuit happy days, i understand most people wouldn't want to do this. Just wondering if there are any other options? TIA, Charles -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: U2 Personal Editions
It might be 'cleaner' to link the files: ln -s /sbin/gunzip /sbin/uncompress Just a thought. Karl On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 12:49, George Gallen wrote: yes, it's uncompress, and the problem isn't just in PE. Since I believe gunzip works with .Z files as well, what I did was cp /sbin/gunzip /sbin/uncompress I will now see if that works :) George -Original Message- From: George Gallen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 2:47 PM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: RE: U2 Personal Editions or possibly, it was ucompress that needed to be changed, as I'm doing a test install right now (not PE however), and I notice the files are .Z types. George -Original Message- From: George Gallen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 2:44 PM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: RE: U2 Personal Editions I believe one problem was either there wasn't unzip or there wasn't gunzip. I changed one to the other. I believe I changed all the references to unzip to gunzip, then it worked. George -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 2:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: U2 Personal Editions I'm trying to install UV and UD Personal Editions. I had an old download of UVPE and am trying to install it. Once upon a time i remember someone mentioning what needed to be changed in uv.load to install it on a non-Redhat system (Debian in my case), but i can't find it in the archives. Anyone know? Alas, i no longer have broadband and the UD download took about 8-10 hours and didn't quite finish. I got 67.1 MB of the 68.2MB of rhlinux71_601PE.tar.gz. Thought i'd try to install it anyway and it almost worked. The server loads and presumably is running ok, but when i try to start the client, i get a message saying the sys/VOC file is version 5.0 and needs to be 6.0. Presumably updatevoc would fix this, but, alas, it appears the files are in alphabetical order and the extraction bombs out in the uojskd directory. Since the download is https, i assume there's no way to use something like wget to resume the download. I have to pay by the minute for internet here in Zambia, so i hate to try to download the whole thing again if i don't have to since the same thing could happen again. Of course the easiest thing would be for someone to send me a gzipped tarball of everything that extracts from uojsdk/lib onward. I really don't think IBM would mind, but in these lawsuit happy days, i understand most people wouldn't want to do this. Just wondering if there are any other options? TIA, Charles -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- Karl L. Pearson Director of IT, ATS Industrial Supply Direct: 801-978-4429 Toll-free: 888-972-3182 x29 Fax: 801-972-3888 http://www.atsindustrial.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: U2 Personal Editions
Since, gzip and gunzip weren't linked, I didn't link uncompress either. BTW, it should have been [cp or ln -s ] /bin/gunzip /bin/uncompress -Original Message- From: Karl L Pearson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 3:41 PM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: RE: U2 Personal Editions It might be 'cleaner' to link the files: ln -s /sbin/gunzip /sbin/uncompress Just a thought. Karl On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 12:49, George Gallen wrote: yes, it's uncompress, and the problem isn't just in PE. Since I believe gunzip works with .Z files as well, what I did was cp /sbin/gunzip /sbin/uncompress I will now see if that works :) George -Original Message- From: George Gallen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 2:47 PM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: RE: U2 Personal Editions or possibly, it was ucompress that needed to be changed, as I'm doing a test install right now (not PE however), and I notice the files are .Z types. George -Original Message- From: George Gallen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 2:44 PM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: RE: U2 Personal Editions I believe one problem was either there wasn't unzip or there wasn't gunzip. I changed one to the other. I believe I changed all the references to unzip to gunzip, then it worked. George -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 2:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: U2 Personal Editions I'm trying to install UV and UD Personal Editions. I had an old download of UVPE and am trying to install it. Once upon a time i remember someone mentioning what needed to be changed in uv.load to install it on a non-Redhat system (Debian in my case), but i can't find it in the archives. Anyone know? Alas, i no longer have broadband and the UD download took about 8-10 hours and didn't quite finish. I got 67.1 MB of the 68.2MB of rhlinux71_601PE.tar.gz. Thought i'd try to install it anyway and it almost worked. The server loads and presumably is running ok, but when i try to start the client, i get a message saying the sys/VOC file is version 5.0 and needs to be 6.0. Presumably updatevoc would fix this, but, alas, it appears the files are in alphabetical order and the extraction bombs out in the uojskd directory. Since the download is https, i assume there's no way to use something like wget to resume the download. I have to pay by the minute for internet here in Zambia, so i hate to try to download the whole thing again if i don't have to since the same thing could happen again. Of course the easiest thing would be for someone to send me a gzipped tarball of everything that extracts from uojsdk/lib onward. I really don't think IBM would mind, but in these lawsuit happy days, i understand most people wouldn't want to do this. Just wondering if there are any other options? TIA, Charles -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- Karl L. Pearson Director of IT, ATS Industrial Supply Direct: 801-978-4429 Toll-free: 888-972-3182 x29 Fax: 801-972-3888 http://www.atsindustrial.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: Help wanted - Avante Configurator
John, I was previously an Avante ERP consultant at Epicor, I have been independent since May 2000. My configurator skills are a little rusty as I haven't worked on it about 18 months, but I'm sure that they will come back quickly when I put my hands on it again. Feel free to contact me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] I will provide phone contact information at that time and any references that you require. Thanks, John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jr laptop Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 5:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Help wanted - Avante Configurator This is not strictly U2 specific but I believe it is close enough to = justify a posting. My client is looking for some help with Avante Configurator. This is a special skill which is not exactly coding but does require detailed knowledge and experience of this part of the Avante ERP = offering. It is likely that some readers may know of likely candidates. The position will be in New Jersey and be of two or three month=92s = duration. The client is looking for implementation and setup of the configurator = plus some training in its use. Further details upon application to: John Rodgers Rodgers Consulting Inc Cell: 678 5223622 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.642 / Virus Database: 410 - Release Date: 3/24/2004 -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Extracting data directly from dbf files...
Has anyone developed any processes to natively read '.dbf' type files from within Universe basic? I know we could use ODBC or UniObjects but prefer a more direct approach. Lee J Messenger Sr VP Operations [EMAIL PROTECTED] DLT Transportation Services, Inc. Phone :(816) 242-4505 Fax :(816) 483-7222 -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: UniObjects
UniObjects does not use a sockets-based interface, so SSL and so on aren't relevant. Rather, UniObjects uses a proprietary interface built on an architecture called InterCall. The only security is a port number that's not used for anything else, and a check in the unirpcservices file about nodes permitted to access the uvcs/udcs service. In particular, no encryption is available within the product. - Original Message - From: Kevin Vezertzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 14:53:23 -0400 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: UniObjects Does anyone have knowledge of how to handle secure communications from UniObjects into Universe? (SSL, SSH, etc.) We are covered from end user to UniObjects, but not from UniObjects to Universe. I haven't been able to find any supporting documentation.. Thanks, Kevin Kevin D. Vezertzis Project Manager Cypress Business Solutions, LLC. 678.494.9353 ext. 6576 Fax 678.494.9354 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit us at www.cypressesolutions.com -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: Makeudt
On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 23:27, Ken Wallis wrote: Dirk Bartley wrote: Found out from some googling around that I needed the elf libraries. That got me to the ndbm issue. What other libraries did you discover were required?? Is the gdbm library a correct replacement for the ndbm library?? The other library I am stuck on is when compiling ictest it keeps telling me I need a 'socket' library. Did you run into this?? Apparently IBM's binary distribution of UniData for linux is compiled on RedHat 7.X, and compiler differences after that make it impossible to makeudt. If this is for a proper, licenced installation of UniData and not just for the PE version, I'd strongly suggest you get in touch with IBM support on this. There are specific point releases of UniData which are needed for specific Linux builds if you want to use makeudt. Your experience of successfully building a udt only to have it seg fault is something I've seen and it came down to needing a different ud version for that Linux build. A potential start point is the availability matrix, but I don't think it is entirely up to date: https://www-927.ibm.com/software/data/u2/support/u2techconnect/matrix.asp Looked at this before, I had not taken it as strict os version / unidata version mandatory. This is the first time for me to see a software package that runs on linux has issues like this from distriburion version level so it has taken me by surprise. The server unidata is running on is currently not a generic installation from a specific version. libc has been recompiled to get ldap to function. It was originally a Redhat 7.0 install. The kernel has also been recompiled for large memory support and dual processor support. I have contacted my software vendor which we pay for unidata support to get them to send me the latest unidata version. I have installation disks to install the version of Redhat for the above linked matrix. Once I get an os-version with a unidata version approved in the matrix I will try again. https://www-927.ibm.com/software/data/u2/support/u2techconnect/binary.htm Many thanks to Tim and Ken for the information. Dirk Also, before you search the world for libraries to install on your Linux box, I'd try removing references to the missing libs from the base.mk file. I know you don't need to link with libelf, and seem to recall that libsocket is no longer a separate library, but is instead now rolled into libc. I'm not sure that libndbm is necessary either. HTH, Ken -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
JUST GOT A SPOOFED U2-USERS EMAIL - Site changes
headers as follows: Received: from mrelay.corp.slackinc.net (MRELAY [172.16.20.139]) by poison.slackinc.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id 2FN2XXZT; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 17:04:41 -0400 Received: from mail.slackinc.com ([10.10.1.45]) by mrelay.corp.slackinc.net (SAVSMTP 3.1.0.29) with SMTP id M2004040717044118434 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 07 Apr 2004 17:04:41 -0400 Received: from pinball.org ([212.243.40.152]) by mail.slackinc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 7 Apr 2004 17:04:39 -0400 Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 23:04:43 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Site changes From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=waadulformneathsntfe Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Apr 2004 21:04:39.0647 (UTC) FILETIME=[F0CF06F0:01C41CE3] --waadulformneathsntfe Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --waadulformneathsntfe Content-Type: image/bmp; name=rqxfvanudp.bmp Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=rqxfvanudp.bmp Content-ID: rqxfvanudp.bmp --waadulformneathsntfe Content-Type: text/plain; name=DELETED0.TXT Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=DELETED0.TXT --waadulformneathsntfe-- George Gallen Senior Programmer/Analyst Accounting/Data Division [EMAIL PROTECTED] ph:856.848.1000 Ext 220 SLACK Incorporated - An innovative information, education and management company http://www.slackinc.com -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: UniObjects
The transport layer between the two servers, Universe Database and UniObject Client, is thru a TCPIP/socket; this is the network traffic that we are trying to encrypt. Hiding the port or restricting the node access does not keep the packets from being captured Has anyone tried using Stunnel? James F Thompson Senior Systems Analyst Cypress Business Solutions, LLC 678.494.9353 Ext 6575 Fax 678.494.9354 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.cypressesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Wurlod Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 4:47 PM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: Re: UniObjects UniObjects does not use a sockets-based interface, so SSL and so on aren't relevant. Rather, UniObjects uses a proprietary interface built on an architecture called InterCall. The only security is a port number that's not used for anything else, and a check in the unirpcservices file about nodes permitted to access the uvcs/udcs service. In particular, no encryption is available within the product. - Original Message - From: Kevin Vezertzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 14:53:23 -0400 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: UniObjects Does anyone have knowledge of how to handle secure communications from UniObjects into Universe? (SSL, SSH, etc.) We are covered from end user to UniObjects, but not from UniObjects to Universe. I haven't been able to find any supporting documentation.. Thanks, Kevin Kevin D. Vezertzis Project Manager Cypress Business Solutions, LLC. 678.494.9353 ext. 6576 Fax 678.494.9354 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit us at www.cypressesolutions.com -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: UniObjects
While we are discussing UniObject... has anyone out there had any luck with it and ColdFusion? We are having a problem with assigning a value to a dynamic array using the Field/Value method. Only the last value is retained in the array and it is always in the first attribute. James F Thompson Senior Systems Analyst Cypress Business Solutions, LLC 678.494.9353 Ext 6575 Fax 678.494.9354 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.cypressesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Wurlod Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 4:47 PM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: Re: UniObjects UniObjects does not use a sockets-based interface, so SSL and so on aren't relevant. Rather, UniObjects uses a proprietary interface built on an architecture called InterCall. The only security is a port number that's not used for anything else, and a check in the unirpcservices file about nodes permitted to access the uvcs/udcs service. In particular, no encryption is available within the product. - Original Message - From: Kevin Vezertzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 14:53:23 -0400 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: UniObjects Does anyone have knowledge of how to handle secure communications from UniObjects into Universe? (SSL, SSH, etc.) We are covered from end user to UniObjects, but not from UniObjects to Universe. I haven't been able to find any supporting documentation.. Thanks, Kevin Kevin D. Vezertzis Project Manager Cypress Business Solutions, LLC. 678.494.9353 ext. 6576 Fax 678.494.9354 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit us at www.cypressesolutions.com -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: UniObjects
Kevin wrote: Does anyone have knowledge of how to handle secure communications from UniObjects into Universe? (SSL, SSH, etc.) We are covered from end user to UniObjects, but not from UniObjects to Universe. I haven't been able to find any supporting documentation.. We have firewalls in place which encrypt the traffic between the web server (which uses UniObjects for Java) and the database server. If you're going to do it that way, buy two for each end and configure them to fail over, we've been down WAY more times because one of the firewall appliances was misbehaving than due to a real problem with either of the servers. I assume the original post was about UniObjects-for-VB, but the UOJ manual does discuss using SSL. (Considering how much fun I had trying to get SSL working with CallHTTP, I am not planning to use it with UOJ.) -- Wendy Smoak Application Systems Analyst, Sr. ASU IA Information Resources Management -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: U2 Personal Editions
For Debian, i had to remove the c option from the taperead='cpio -ivc... line. Somewhere along the way, i must have installed compress/uncompress, so that wasn't an issue. Now, if i can figure out why my xterm gets clobbered when i start uv as root. Something wrong with the emulation somewhere. Seems to work ok as a normal user. There must be something in the admin menu that messes it up. Charles Hawkins -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: Extracting data directly from dbf files...
I'm fairly certain that the cedarville download utility handles dbf files. Since it comes with source code perhaps you can change the write logic to read Rich Lee Messenger wrote: Has anyone developed any processes to natively read '.dbf' type files from within Universe basic? I know we could use ODBC or UniObjects but prefer a more direct approach. Lee J Messenger Sr VP Operations [EMAIL PROTECTED] DLT Transportation Services, Inc. Phone :(816) 242-4505 Fax :(816) 483-7222 -- Richard A. Wilson Lakeside Systems Smithfield, RI, USA Voice 401-231-3959 Fax 401-231-3943 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.lakeside-systems.com -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [UV] MCP
Ray, The CTYPE category only has ALPHABETIC, NUMERIC and TRIMMABLE (and, by inference, other) classes. I would hazard the guess that characters in the two Control Sets (Control Set 0 and Control Set 1) are those considered not printable. The BASIC manual refers to PRINTABLE and NON_PRINTABLE fields in the NLS.LC.CTYPE file? Is this an error in the docs? (UniVerse BASIC manual v 10.0 page C-31) In your place I'd be seeking an official answer, and posting it. I'll do that now. thanks, Craig -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: UniObjects
How about opening a PPTP link from the PCs that will connect to the server, then opening the TCP/IP uniObjects connection through the tunnel? Isn't that what Stunnel does anyway? Karl On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 15:16, James F Thompson wrote: The transport layer between the two servers, Universe Database and UniObject Client, is thru a TCPIP/socket; this is the network traffic that we are trying to encrypt. Hiding the port or restricting the node access does not keep the packets from being captured Has anyone tried using Stunnel? James F Thompson Senior Systems Analyst Cypress Business Solutions, LLC 678.494.9353 Ext 6575Fax 678.494.9354 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.cypressesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Wurlod Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 4:47 PM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: Re: UniObjects UniObjects does not use a sockets-based interface, so SSL and so on aren't relevant. Rather, UniObjects uses a proprietary interface built on an architecture called InterCall. The only security is a port number that's not used for anything else, and a check in the unirpcservices file about nodes permitted to access the uvcs/udcs service. In particular, no encryption is available within the product. - Original Message - From: Kevin Vezertzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 14:53:23 -0400 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: UniObjects Does anyone have knowledge of how to handle secure communications from UniObjects into Universe? (SSL, SSH, etc.) We are covered from end user to UniObjects, but not from UniObjects to Universe. I haven't been able to find any supporting documentation.. Thanks, Kevin Kevin D. Vezertzis Project Manager Cypress Business Solutions, LLC. 678.494.9353 ext. 6576 Fax 678.494.9354 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit us at www.cypressesolutions.com -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- Karl L. Pearson Director of IT, ATS Industrial Supply Direct: 801-978-4429 Toll-free: 888-972-3182 x29 Fax: 801-972-3888 http://www.atsindustrial.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
RE: UniObjects
I gave up on coldconfusion because the web pages created were simply a mess. Perhaps that was more of a problem with our developers than ColdFusion, but it just works better with ASP.NET or plain old .Net web forms. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James F Thompson Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 5:26 PM To: 'U2 Users Discussion List' Subject: RE: UniObjects While we are discussing UniObject... has anyone out there had any luck with it and ColdFusion? We are having a problem with assigning a value to a dynamic array using the Field/Value method. Only the last value is retained in the array and it is always in the first attribute. James F Thompson Senior Systems Analyst Cypress Business Solutions, LLC 678.494.9353 Ext 6575 Fax 678.494.9354 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.cypressesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Wurlod Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 4:47 PM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: Re: UniObjects UniObjects does not use a sockets-based interface, so SSL and so on aren't relevant. Rather, UniObjects uses a proprietary interface built on an architecture called InterCall. The only security is a port number that's not used for anything else, and a check in the unirpcservices file about nodes permitted to access the uvcs/udcs service. In particular, no encryption is available within the product. - Original Message - From: Kevin Vezertzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 14:53:23 -0400 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: UniObjects Does anyone have knowledge of how to handle secure communications from UniObjects into Universe? (SSL, SSH, etc.) We are covered from end user to UniObjects, but not from UniObjects to Universe. I haven't been able to find any supporting documentation.. Thanks, Kevin Kevin D. Vezertzis Project Manager Cypress Business Solutions, LLC. 678.494.9353 ext. 6576 Fax 678.494.9354 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit us at www.cypressesolutions.com -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Pro-4
Hi all I'm looking for someone who maybe be able to assist with support of a customer using PRO-4 (ex McDonald Douglas ALL) I think. Support will be required in Sydney, Australia. Can anyone help ? Thanks ... Barry Brooks -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: UniVerse and RedBack
We are running UniVerse 10.0.19. We are running RedBack ver 4.1.3. We seem to be having a problem where our Responders go busy and never return to idle. Eventually all Responders go busy and our web 'goes down'. The log files show nothing that would even raise an eyebrow of uncertainty Definitely not OT. We recently had this problem (or very similar) so we may have an answer for you. It is my pet topic - Do an ANALYZE.FILE on WWSTATE file and report the results and for the benefit of all we'll suggest suitable changes for the RESIZE. The WWSTATE file is heavily used by RedBack and some of the items can be rather large. Correct set up of this file is essential. If the set up is inappropriate then the system can get bogged down just trying to update items in this file. Also, you should ensure the GARBAGE COLLECT is done often enough to keep the entries in this file to the minimum. Cheers Trevor Ockenden Open Systems Professionals - Original Message - From: Barry Rogen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 12:18 AM . --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free by AVG 6.0. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.654 / Virus Database: 419 - Release Date: 6/04/2004 -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: Subroutine string manipulation not doing what expected
Tricky! - I've been caught out like this before. You are extracting SEARCH.VALUE from DESC.LIST as an attribute. Try extracting values instead and I suspect all will be fine. SEARCH.VALUE = DESC.LIST1,PLC Cheers Trevor Ockenden Open Systems Professionals - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 12:23 AM Subject: Subroutine string manipulation not doing what expected Given the following snippet of code: FOR PLC = 1 TO PART.LIST.COUNT SEARCH.VALUE = DESC.LISTPLC RETURN.VALUE := SEARCH.VALUE : @VM NEXT PLC ROLLSTOCK=RETURN.VALUE I get the following output: P337 P RPVC 0200x20.00 TNT201 P BOX 19:08 15:08 13:08 BX PLAC 20:08 15:08 11:14 However, a simple change to the code to only add a few digits of DESC.LISTPLC like so: FOR PLC = 1 TO PART.LIST.COUNT SEARCH.VALUE = DESC.LISTPLC IF SEARCH.VALUE[1,1]='*' THEN SEARCH.VALUE = SEARCH.VALUE[4,4] END ELSE SEARCH.VALUE = SEARCH.VALUE[3,4] END RETURN.VALUE := SEARCH.VALUE : @VM NEXT PLC ROLLSTOCK=RETURN.VALUE I get the following outupt...not what I was expecting: 37 P My intention is to grab 4 characters out of DESC.LISTPLC, starting at character 4 if the string starts with an asterix or 3 if it doesn't. Can anyone see what I'm doing wrong here? Thanks. -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free by AVG 6.0. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.654 / Virus Database: 419 - Release Date: 6/04/2004 -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: Pro-4
Barry, Try contacting: www.northgate-is.com Rgds, Dave Dave Taylor Sysmark Information Systems, Inc. 49 Aspen Way Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274 800-SYSMARK (800-797-6275) (O) 310-544-1974 (F) 310-377-3550 www.sysmarkinfo.com - Original Message - From: Barry Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 6:53 PM Subject: Pro-4 Hi all I'm looking for someone who maybe be able to assist with support of a customer using PRO-4 (ex McDonald Douglas ALL) I think. Support will be required in Sydney, Australia. Can anyone help ? Thanks ... Barry Brooks -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: Pro-4
Haven't heard of Application Liberation Language in a dogs age. - Original Message - From: Barry Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 9:53 PM Subject: Pro-4 Hi all I'm looking for someone who maybe be able to assist with support of a customer using PRO-4 (ex McDonald Douglas ALL) I think. Support will be required in Sydney, Australia. Can anyone help ? Thanks ... Barry Brooks -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: Pro-4
In a message dated 4/7/2004 6:53:52 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm looking for someone who maybe be able to assist with support of a customer using PRO-4 (ex McDonald Douglas ALL) I think. Support will be required in Sydney, Australia. My first job was on a Reality 800 I think it was called. Had some horrendous amount of memory like... 512k and something like 20Meg disk or whatever. (Who can remember things 20 years ago?) At any rate, when they came out with the Super Sequels it was like night and day. Imagine sorting a 50,000 item file in Ten minutes! Wow that's fast! Will -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: Pro-4
Goo'day, Barry 1. Stuart?Stewart?Stuart/Stewart Somebody POBOL... Melbourne.. 2. Ints Tumolovic? (ex AWA and Pr1me) Is he still around? Bloody hell! 1982 is a long time ago At 11:53 08/04/04, you wrote: Hi all I'm looking for someone who maybe be able to assist with support of a customer using PRO-4 (ex McDonald Douglas ALL) I think. Support will be required in Sydney, Australia. Can anyone help ? Thanks ... Barry Brooks -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 7.0.230 / Virus Database: 262.7.1 - Release Date: 06/04/04 Regards, Bruce Nichol Talon Computer Services ALBURYNSW 2640 Australia Tel: +61 (0)411149636 Fax: +61 (0)260232119 If it ain't broke, fix it till it is! -- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 7.0.230 / Virus Database: 262.7.1 - Release Date: 06/04/04 -- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
