[ADMIN] The lists now have their new home

2004-05-02 Thread Clif Oliver
Dear Friends,

The lists now are up and running at their new home under the auspices 
of the new U2 Users Group. Since all addresses were passed along to 
Larry, all of you should have already received the welcome message and 
new list server instructions, so I will not repeat them here.

I am setting the full moderation bit on for the old lists so that if 
you post to the old addresses, you will get an auto response reminding 
you of the new list addresses.

I want to thank everyone for making my time as the host of the lists so 
enjoyable and educational. As mentioned in my reminder postings, I 
intend to continue participating in the lists with something other than 
CyberSpankings grin. And I will be using the rest of the new-found 
time working on the new newsletter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and book.

I will see you all over at the new home.

--

Regards,

Clif

~~~
W. Clifton Oliver, CCP
CLIFTON OLIVER  ASSOCIATES
Tel: +1 619 460 5678Web: www.oliver.com
~~~
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [UV] Problem reactivating select list

2004-04-26 Thread Clif Oliver
You might try this. I am not on a system right now, so I can't test 
this until later.

--

Regards,

Clif

~~~
W. Clifton Oliver, CCP
CLIFTON OLIVER  ASSOCIATES
Tel: +1 619 460 5678Web: www.oliver.com
~~~
saveList = 
loop while readnext recordId
   saveList-1 = recordId
repeat
open SAVEDLISTS to slFile else abortm Cannot open SAVEDLISTS
tempId =  (temp  :  @userno)
write saveList on slFile, tempId
close slFile
execute (GET.LIST  : tempId)
execute (ED  : yourFileName)


On Apr 26, 2004, at 18:11, John Hester wrote:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

John what is wrong with this approach
loop
   readnext id else done = true
until done do
   list-1 = id
repeat
select list to mylist
loop
   readnext id else done = true
until done do
   execute ed :file: :id
repeat
then before, after, between the two loops you can do whatever you 
wanted to do
Will
That's close to what I did originally.  The problem is that ED needs 
to think that it is reading from a select list for the X command to 
work.  If I process the select list outside of ED, ED thinks it is 
working against a single item and the only way you can exit the middle 
of a list is with crtlC.

-John

--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


[ADMIN] [AD] Passing the Baton (Repeat)

2004-04-23 Thread Clif Oliver
Dear Friends,

As previously announced, after about nine years of hosting what has 
become the u2-users list, I have decided to pass the baton to a new 
host. I plan to use the time to pursue some other  writing projects. 
One of these is to resume writing my column previously published in 
Infocus Magazine as Clif Notes. I will be choosing a different title 
and will be including it as part of a professional Information 
Management newsletter. If you would be interested in receiving this 
newsletter at no charge, just pop an e-mail to

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

and I will add you to the list.

The U2 User Group (u2ug.org) has offered to assume the duties of host 
and moderator(s). They are in the process of testing their list server 
and setup now. We expect to be able to move the u2-user and 
u2-community lists to the new home May 1st. I will provide them a copy 
of the subscriber addresses as of April 30th. If for some reason you do 
not want to follow the lists to their new homes, you can unsubscribe 
before that time.

Since we are getting new subscribers on an almost daily basis, I will 
be posting this message each day until the move. I apologize for the 
inbox clutter this causes you.

I'll chat with you again before the move.

--

Regards,

Clif

~~~
W. Clifton Oliver, CCP
CLIFTON OLIVER  ASSOCIATES
Tel: +1 619 460 5678Web: www.oliver.com
~~~
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: We need a web based Forum!

2004-04-21 Thread Clif Oliver
Oh. The Microsoft model...

:-)

On Apr 21, 2004, at 6:29, George Gallen wrote:

from it/for it, but if you think your getting a great buy for your
money, your willing to accept almost any flaw.
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [OT] MSDN

2004-04-21 Thread Clif Oliver
Stop teasing us, Tony. grin What's the source where we can get MSDN 
subscriptions for $1,300?

--

Regards,

Clif

On Apr 21, 2004, at 12:36, Tony Gravagno wrote:

Replied to e-mail request before I saw this.  Yes, everything comes 
direct
from Microsoft, DVDs, newsletters, support, etc.  MS never questioned 
the
source and I get the same services as anyone who buys direct.  I have 
never
received anything from the original vendor.

Where did you find the legal MSDN for $1300?  My renewal is
now up for $2300 and with the DVD rebate, it is still  $2000.
Do the shipments still come directly from Microsoft?  Thanks.
Regards,

Jim


For Visual Studio .NET I acquired a legal copy of an MSDN Universal
subscription for US1300, the included freebies brought that
down to a net of less than $1000.
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [OT] MSDN

2004-04-21 Thread Clif Oliver
Comments embedded in the message below.

On Apr 21, 2004, at 16:10, Tony Gravagno wrote:

Get it here: http://store.viosoftware.biz/msunsu701yes.html
Thanks, Tony. We appreciate you letting us in on the secret grin. And 
thanks to JD for the other source.


Tell them to implement a commission program and then send me a credit 
on my
next purchase!  :)
I think we can talk the U2UG board into giving you a year's 
complimentary subscription to the list.

(That's a *joke*, people. Stop panicking!)


production use, my development system IS my production system which I
destroy on a regular basis as I install and test code.
As do I, but frequently not on purpose. :-)

Clif we ought to vote Chuck 'most copied' Oliver

--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: We need a web based Forum!

2004-04-21 Thread Clif Oliver
What? Using something given for free without insisting it be tailored 
to your individual desires? Careful, Kate. The Programmers Guild will 
take away your membership card if word leaks out. grin

--

Regards,

Clif

On Apr 21, 2004, at 16:36, Kate Stanton wrote:

Thanks.

Sounds to me as though it should be the choice of whoever is 
shouldering the
responsibility of looking after it.  If they are prepared to do the 
work,
then I applaud them and am privileged to be able to use it, in 
whatever way
they choose.

Cheers,  Kate
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: GUI from Mv code Re: Crystal Reports

2004-04-18 Thread Clif Oliver
Yeah. Then I'd be accused of shooting the baby with a wet silver bullet.

Seriously folks, this is a good discussion, but it getting a bit off 
topic at times. I would suggest doing what Ross did a few posts ago. 
Rather than go into a long discussion about is a star schema a cube or 
a representation of an n-dimensional super-duper-hyper-pterodactyl 
cube, post some links to areas where those interested in the 
not-necessarily-U2 topic can find further info.

And to ALL the vendors, please remember that if you mention your 
product in the post, you really ought to put [AD] in the subject line.

Now, would anyone care to post any experiences on performance of 
implementing a star schema in a set of normalized U2 files and doing 
drill down and roll up strictly with LIST, SORT, and its options?  Post 
numbers, not guesses.

--

Regards,

Clif

On Apr 18, 2004, at 21:52, Ross Ferris wrote:

You are right - there are no silver bullets, you don't throw the baby 
out with the bath water [I will not go into the sordid history of this 
one], and some degree of effort is required to embrace anything that 
is new

[and I'll exit the thread there before I get spanked by Clif :-]
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: *** END OF THREAD *** Oh, dear, Mr Oliver - havent you learnt yet... Put it in the subject line, dear boy! RE: The future of U2

2004-04-15 Thread Clif Oliver
laughing Apparently not. Sorry!

--

Regards,

Clif

On Apr 15, 2004, at 2:42, Dennis Bartlett wrote:



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Clif Oliver
Sent: 15 April 2004 03:10
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: Re: The future of U2
*** END OF THREAD ***

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS THREAD ANY FURTHER

(That means *anyone* not just the poster of the message used
for the
Moderator reply)
On Apr 14, 2004, at 13:39, Tom Firl wrote:

U2 TO DB2 --- Best thing to Happen.
H... I don't think I'll touch that one other than to
say that only
time will tell.

Tom Firl
Columbia Ultimate
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


[ADMIN] Re: The future of U2

2004-04-14 Thread Clif Oliver
OK, Joe. So you subscribed under a different address to get around 
having your inflammatory postings moderated. That is a clear act of 
unwillingness to cooperate with the policies of this list.

buh-bye

plonk

*** END OF THREAD ***

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS THREAD ANY FURTHER

(That means *anyone* not just the poster of the message used for the 
Moderator reply)

On Apr 14, 2004, at 12:36, Joe Eugene wrote:

U2 TO DB2 --- Best thing to Happen.

Hopefully IBM will start integrating all IBM DB's into Flagship RDBMS
UDB.
Joe Eugene

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of Roger Glenfield
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 11:21 PM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: The future of U2
I believe the wording was DB2 and then others based on 'demand'.

Roger

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Ross Ferris
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 11:06 PM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: The future of U2
I'd also think that rather than any database, the target would
be DB2 :-)
Ross Ferris
Stamina Software
Visage - an Evolution in Software Development
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: The future of U2

2004-04-14 Thread Clif Oliver
*** END OF THREAD ***

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS THREAD ANY FURTHER

(That means *anyone* not just the poster of the message used for the 
Moderator reply)

On Apr 14, 2004, at 13:39, Tom Firl wrote:

U2 TO DB2 --- Best thing to Happen.
H... I don't think I'll touch that one other than to say that only 
time will tell.

Tom Firl
Columbia Ultimate
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: The future of U2

2004-04-14 Thread Clif Oliver
*** END OF THREAD ***

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS THREAD ANY FURTHER

(That means *anyone* not just the poster of the message used for the 
Moderator reply)

On Apr 14, 2004, at 13:45, Gordon Glorfield wrote:

I don't really care what the backend DB engine is as long as I can use 
my
favorite set of tools to develop applications.  But if a change to DB2 
or
whatever is going to force me to severly change the way I operate, 
then I'd
see that as a bad thing.

Gordon J. Glorfield
Sr. Applications Developer
MAMSI (A UnitedHealth Company)
301-360-8839




This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or
proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity 
to
which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended
recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify 
the
sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately.

--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Database decoupling (Was: Future of U2)

2004-04-14 Thread Clif Oliver
I did not mean to kill the part of the discussion that was being held 
under the previous Subject line that was talking about other-than-U2 
datastores in a U2 environment. I seem to have caused some confusion 
with my end-of-thread notice under that subject line. I was only 
referring to responding to the troll (who has been unsubscribed).

Please feel free to continue the discussion.

(Sorry 'bout that folks. No collateral damage intended!)

--

Regards,

Clif

--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: Productivity metrics

2004-04-14 Thread Clif Oliver
In the words from Hitchhiker's Guide, Oh, no. Not again.

On Apr 14, 2004, at 19:42, Mark Johnson wrote:

reducing lines of code. Could this be where GOTO's have their day.
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: *** END OF THREAD *** Was: RE: Modern Universe (TESTING)

2004-04-08 Thread Clif Oliver
Excellent idea. I will make sure it gets passed along to the new hosts.

Thank you.

--

Regards,

Clif

On Apr 8, 2004, at 1:14 AM, Dennis Bartlett wrote:

A bit late in the day, but it would be better if you put END
OF THREAD
in the subject line as those of us who selectively read
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


[ADMIN] VIRUS ALERT!!

2004-04-06 Thread Clif Oliver
Some of you may have received an e-mail claiming your account was 
being shutdown for (improper usage, spam, a proxity trojan, etc.). The 
mail is usually signed oliver.com Team, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], etc.

THIS IS A SPOOFED MESSAGE by a virus that goes through Outlook address 
books, collects addresses, and generates these spoof messages.

The only valid message of anyone being suspended was the Cyberspanking 
issued last night.

I post only as [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I will repost this message later today from my other machine so I can 
digitally sign it for verification.

Interesting timing of this attack, however. Makes one wonder

--

Regards,

Clif

--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: Modern Universe (TESTING)

2004-04-06 Thread Clif Oliver
*** END OF THREAD ***

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS THREAD ANY FURTHER

(That means *anyone* not just the poster of the message used for the 
Moderator reply)

On Apr 6, 2004, at 4:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I am kind of enjoying it.





Glenn W. Paschal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
04/05/2004 10:53 PM
Please respond to U2 Users Discussion List
To: 'U2 Users Discussion List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: Modern Universe (TESTING)
Why is this thread here?  And, why is it still continuing?
Can we stop now?
--Glenn.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On
Behalf Of Andrew Gissing
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 9:55 PM
To: U2 Users Discussion List
Subject: RE: Modern Universe (TESTING)


If you Dont Agree, Prove it... Everybody can Talk.. Where are your
Test Results?
The problem with performance tests is that there are so many variables.
And
then if you remove a lot of the variables to perform a lab test, that 
does
not reflect real world.

So then you try and make your lab conditions simulate real world - and
simply doing a COUNT on a file is not enough - sorry !
Yes, UV could count for 15 mins if say the file was really badly 
sized. So
what does that mean ? It does not mean that UV is crap, it means it's 
not
been tuned right.

Send Michael Schumaker round the track with flat tyres - when he does 
not
perform is that the fault of the car ?

So my final point is that it takes time and effort to do proper 
testing -
something most of us are not going to dedicate resources to just to 
prove
a
point here.

Andrew Gissing

--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: Email report

2004-04-06 Thread Clif Oliver
Yep. Let's hear it for Mailman's MIME removal capability.

--

Regards,

Clif

On Apr 6, 2004, at 6:27 AM, Gordon Glorfield wrote:

The attachment that I got was only a text file.  Presumably Clif's
anti-virus software on the list server is replacing whatever evil 
attachment
was originally sent with this text file before forwarding the message.

Gordon J. Glorfield
Sr. Applications Developer
MAMSI (A UnitedHealth Company)
301-360-8839
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: Modern Universe (TESTING)

2004-04-05 Thread Clif Oliver
*** END OF THREAD ***

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS THREAD ANY FURTHER

(That means *anyone* not just the poster of the message used for the 
Moderator reply)

On Apr 5, 2004, at 7:54 PM, Andrew Gissing wrote:

If you Dont Agree, Prove it... Everybody can Talk.. Where are your 
Test
Results?
The problem with performance tests is that there are so many 
variables. And
then if you remove a lot of the variables to perform a lab test, that 
does
not reflect real world.

So then you try and make your lab conditions simulate real world - and
simply doing a COUNT on a file is not enough - sorry !
Yes, UV could count for 15 mins if say the file was really badly 
sized. So
what does that mean ? It does not mean that UV is crap, it means it's 
not
been tuned right.

Send Michael Schumaker round the track with flat tyres - when he does 
not
perform is that the fault of the car ?

So my final point is that it takes time and effort to do proper 
testing -
something most of us are not going to dedicate resources to just to 
prove a
point here.

Andrew Gissing

--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users