Re: [UD] RFS and SAN storage

2004-03-25 Thread Timothy Snyder





[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Doug Miller) wrote on 03/24/2004 11:45:32 AM:

 With the MC Service guard they can TOC a system (Transfer of control) at
a
 drop of a hat and be back up and running on the 2nd machine very
 quickly.  The 2nd machine grabs the ip address of the primary and people
 just have to log in again and pick back up where they were.

I agree with Doug - this can be a very slick implementation if done
correctly.  I've worked with RFS installations on HP-UX with
MC/ServiceGuard, and on AIX with HACMP.  The clustering software nicely
handles the fail-over, with the assumption that UniData is running with RFS
to handle the cleanup.  However, it's critical to ensure that UniData is
set up correctly in the shared environment.  There are components that need
to be available on the shared disk, and other components that need to be
unique to each system.  If all of the pieces aren't in the right places,
the TOC could result in a failure when starting UniData, or an invalid RFS
recovery.  Tread softly and test thoroughly when implementing this sort of
solution.  Also make sure the clustered environment is set up by somebody
that understands it inside and out.  This can be very complex to implement.

Back to the original question, there's no fundamental problem with running
RFS over a SAN.  If at all humanly possible, you'll want to isolate the
before-image, after-image, file-level, and archive logs from the database
files.  This is important for performance, since you don't want heads and
controllers busy updating the database and log files at the same time.
Also, if there is an unrecoverable media failure (not too likely these
days, but it does happen!), you don't want it to take out the database
files the archive logs at the same time.  Otherwise you'll have to resort
to your backups with no way to recover to the point of the failure.

Tim Snyder
IBM Data Management Solutions
Consulting I/T Specialist , U2 Professional Services

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


RE: [UD] RFS and SAN storage

2004-03-24 Thread kenws
Thanks Rodney,

Can you confirm that you do use RFS?  If you have 30GB files then they must
be dynamic, so they must be OK on SAN too.

Cheers,

Ken

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Baakkonen, Rodney

We have been using a Hitachi SAN with Veritas for several
years on a Solaris
machine. We moved there from a DG environment using mirrored
disks. I can't
think of anything to note about the change. We have a couple of files
aproaching 30 gig in size. The SAN has performed well. We are
on Unidata 5.2
but in the process of moving to 6.0. We have been on a SAN
since 2002. - ROd


-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


RE: [UD] RFS and SAN storage

2004-03-23 Thread Baakkonen, Rodney
We have been using a Hitachi SAN with Veritas for several years on a Solaris
machine. We moved there from a DG environment using mirrored disks. I can't
think of anything to note about the change. We have a couple of files
aproaching 30 gig in size. The SAN has performed well. We are on Unidata 5.2
but in the process of moving to 6.0. We have been on a SAN since 2002. - ROd

-Original Message-
From: Ken Wallis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 1:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [UD] RFS and SAN storage


Although there aren't many people here who make use of UniData's RFS
facility, I know there are a few.  I'm hoping that one or two of those might
have some experience (good or bad) of setting up RFS files which are
physically located on a SAN rather than on local disk.

A client of mine is has a policy that all application data should, where
possible, be stored on their EMC SAN instead of on local disks.  They don't,
however have a machine I can use for testing at this point that can access
their SAN storage.

At the moment this client is on Tru64 UNIX, and we know that there is no
problem with UniData recoverable files on Compaq SAN storage, but the
direction is away from HP/Compaq Tru64 and towards either AIX or Solaris
utilising EMC SAN storage via Veritas.

Has anybody either had this working, or tried to make it work and failed
miserably?

Current UniData version is 5.2, will move to 6.0.8 or higher probably at the
same time as switching to SAN disks.

Cheers,

Ken


-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users