Re: [Ubnt_users] Airfiber team - anyone left there?

[G. Nicholas]

According to Chuck's linkedin profile, yes he is.

- Original Message -
From: Mathew Howard
Sent: 1/7/2019 10:00:41 AM
To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Airfiber team - anyone left there?

> Chuck Macenski is still around, isn't he?
> 
> 
> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org  on behalf 
of Josh Luthman 
> Sent: Monday, January 7, 2019 9:30:27 AM
> To: Ubiquiti Users Group
> Subject: [Ubnt_users] Airfiber team - anyone left there?
> 
> I was previously talking to Bill about some software changes that really 
needed done and he's since disappeared (not answering emails).  Ben is gone, 
too.
> 
> Is there anyone besides tier 1 that we can talk to or are they just ignoring 
all the WISPs?
> 
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> 

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti Sues Cambium

[G. Nicholas]

Troy,

Regarding personnel change at the top highly unlikely. Robert Pera still owns 
about 70% of the stock and if you look at the 600 Million in stock 
repurchases the company recently did so he could sell back some of his shares 
to Treasury stock without diluting his ownership control to get the cash he 
needs to buy up the minority shares of Grizzlies BB team, Robert is still 
clearly in control.



- Original Message -
From: Troy Gibson, Byhalia.net,LLC
Sent: 8/12/2018 3:50:36 PM
To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti Sues Cambium

> Lots of things in play when you miss the $20 million call for expected 
quarter results.   Investors want answers and blood for lost value, so 
timing is perfect, but I bet there may be some personal change at the top of 
UBNT too.

Troy Gibson
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
 Original message From: Mathew Howard  
Date: 8/12/18  2:42 PM  (GMT-05:00) To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti Sues Cambium 
The fact that they did this just a couple weeks before their next report 
makes me suspect that service provider revenue fell even more this quarter.


From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf 
of Seth Mattinen [se...@rollernet.us]
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2018 1:14 PM
To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti Sues Cambium

On 8/12/18 11:01 AM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
> People didn’t buy. Move on. Good months and bad. Don’t like it?  Stop
> investing. Any other questions?
>


Previous quarter: We'll see at least $20 million in this sector by next
quarter!

This quarter: Uh, actually we didn't see any of that money, but it was
our competitor's fault so we sued them.
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] UVC-G3-PRO Camera question

[G. Nicholas]

The Optical zoom is manual.  There is no zoom motor on the lens.

- Original Message -
From: ralph
Sent: 2/23/2018 4:02:11 PM
To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] UVC-G3-PRO Camera question

> Since no one responded, I am rephrasing-
> Is it a power zoom?  If so, where is the control?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of ralph
> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 7:37 PM
> To: 'Ubiquiti Users Group' 
> Subject: [Ubnt_users] UVC-G3-PRO Camera question
> 
> Is the 3x optical zoom just manually adjustable at installation, or is it
> remotely controllable?
> I have gone through the documentation and I can't find where it is
> explained.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Ralph
> 
> 
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> 
> 
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> 

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Peak CCQ drops

[G. Nicholas]

Forbes,

As long as all your M series radios are XW firmware I would upgrade them to 6.1 
and then upgrade your AC radios to 8.4 and then switch to fixed frame mode  
75/25 
8ms with GPS sync.  That is what we are running and on some of our heavy loaded 
sites with 12 Prism AC APs it really has cut back on self-interference.

Garth

- Original Message -
From: Forbes Mercy
Sent: 10/5/2017 2:24:48 PM
To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
Subject: [Ubnt_users] Peak CCQ drops

> I'm baffled at diagnosing this one.  I have a very busy tower with 14 
AP's fed by two links that move about 6-700Mbs at peak hours.  During 
those hours customers that during the day are running CCQ's in the 90's 
suddenly drop to 60-70% ccq and their pings go from a 30ms average up to 
2000+ms only during peak usage.  This seems to run across many 
connections to the tower. My techs have tried everything to find the 
problem, we run heavy duty Mikrotik routers at that tower and it's fed 
by a licensed 11ghz and a fiber fed AF24.

The frequencies are well spaced and these are happening on Prisim AC2 
radios (although in mixed mode, non-synced) as one particular customer 
is on an XW NB22.  We checked for surrounding customer noise such as 
router/AP's, nothing.  Any suggestions would be appreciated.

Forbes Mercy
Washington Broadband, Inc.
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Purchase Agreement

[G. Nicholas]

Roy,

Any well written and reviewed by an attorney tower lease should have an 
assignment clause.

All the major tower companies include that in their leases.  From the tower 
companies point of view they will want to keep the new operator as a customer.
The only time I have seen this as an issue was when the seller didn't have 
tower 
lease contracts just hand shake agreements.  If you find that when doing your 
pre-purchase due diligence then you want to have the seller get all his tower 
leases in writing first.

Garth

- Original Message -
From: Roy
Sent: 8/21/2017 2:24:40 PM
To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Purchase Agreement

> Any leases especially for tower space could be a problem for an asset 
purchase.  Things like that may not be transferable.





On 8/21/2017 12:12 PM, G. Nicholas wrote:
> As I general rule I would do an asset purchase.  If you buy the Corporation or
> LLC then you are inheriting any outstanding liabilities, tax liens or 
judgments,
> lawsuits, etc.
>
> We have bought out 2 other WISPs so far as Asset purchases.
>
> Garth Nicholas
> CFO
> New Wave Net Corp
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Roy
> Sent: 8/21/2017 1:32:53 PM
> To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Purchase Agreement
>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Purchase Agreement

[G. Nicholas]

As I general rule I would do an asset purchase.  If you buy the Corporation or 
LLC then you are inheriting any outstanding liabilities, tax liens or 
judgments, 
lawsuits, etc.

We have bought out 2 other WISPs so far as Asset purchases.

Garth Nicholas
CFO
New Wave Net Corp

- Original Message -
From: Roy
Sent: 8/21/2017 1:32:53 PM
To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Purchase Agreement

> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> 

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Edgerouter Infinity ? Feedback ?

[G. Nicholas]

Would have loved too but they were always sold out in the UB beta store every 
day 
I checked.

Garth

- Original Message -
From: Faisal Imtiaz
Sent: 8/9/2017 4:33:51 PM
To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
Subject: [Ubnt_users] Edgerouter Infinity ?  Feedback ?

> Hello,
> 
> Anyone playing / testing Edgerouter Infinity ?
> 
> I would love to get some feedback.. the good the bad and the ugly !
> 
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> 7266 SW 48 Street
> Miami, FL 33155
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
> 
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> 

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] client isolation

[G. Nicholas]

Jay,

Sounds like you are running the radio in bridge mode?

If so use the firewall on the client radio LAN

block src udp port 67 0.0.0.0/32 destination 0.0.0.0/32 udp 68


Garth


- Original Message -
From: CBB - Jay Fuller
Sent: 7/27/2017 5:18:02 PM
To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
Subject: [Ubnt_users] client isolation

> 
> 
> Just found i have a business on a tower that has a tp link plugged in 
backwards.  The invalid DHCP ranges are getting across the interface to other 
businesses on the same switch.  If I enable "client isolation" on the access 
point will it prevent this until we can reach the business?
> There are only two people on the access point in question.
> 
> Thanks :)
> 
> 

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket 5AC-PTP and PtMP end of live?

[G. Nicholas]

Eduardo.

Yes they were update to the Rocket5AC-Pism which does either PTMP or PTP with 
the 
same radio.

If you really need a 5AC-PTMP  I have one lightly used one we replaced that I 
would let you have for $125 shipping included.

Garth
New Wave Net
Bloomington, IL

- Original Message -
From: Eduardo
Sent: 6/26/2017 6:22:59 PM
To: Ubnt_users@wispa.org
Subject: [Ubnt_users] Rocket 5AC-PTP and PtMP end of live?

> 
> I was looking for the Rocket 5AC-PtP and PtMP and couldn’t find them in the 
manufacturer’s website.
> 
> Does anyone know if those radios aren’t any more for sale? Were they 
> replaced 
by the 5AC-Gen2? 
> 
> Thanks,
> Eduardo
> 

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Airfiber sale?

[G. Nicholas]

I think Amazon is messing with their pricing system, they are now up to $239.99 
with 11 left in stock.  So if anyone else needs some I would order now.

Garth

- Original Message -
From: Chris J. Ruschmann
Sent: 4/20/2017 11:20:04 AM
To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
Subject: [Ubnt_users] Airfiber sale?

> Anyone know why af-2x's are showing up as 99.00 on amazon? I just bought 6 of 
them and they are shipping already.
> 
> https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B013Z7S3RQ/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o00_s00?
ie=UTF8=1
> 
> 
> 

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket recommendation?

[G. Nicholas]

Rocket AC Prism  with 8x firmware support both legacy N-based as well as new AC 
based CPE.

- Original Message -
From: Roy
Sent: 2/9/2017 11:12:44 AM
To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
Subject: [Ubnt_users] Rocket recommendation?

> We will be putting up a new tower to split the current customer base.  
> My thinking right now is two 90 degree sectors.  The other 180 degrees 
> is hillside so no need to radiate in that direction
> 
> The clients are all Nanobridge/Powerbeams non-AC radios but we want to 
> add AC into the mix.  The environment is 5Ghz with lots of other radios 
> out there.
> 
> Looking at the bewildering array of Rocket radios, I am looking for some 
> recommendations on what equipment to use.
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> 

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware Releases

[G. Nicholas]

Chris,

Yes in our case but that was probably due to the fact that we had some sectors 
with over 25 CPE, which is really more then a rocket AP can handle when we sell 
4, 6, and 10Mbps plans, although with the Prisms we now offer a 25 Mbps plan.  
The second cpu on the Prism for Airmax really helps.  Plus while I can't say 
when it will be released, they do have GPS sync capability (in 8.1 Alpha). 

Garth



- Original Message -
From: Frost
Sent: 12/22/2016 2:03:45 PM
To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware Releases

> Garth, did you see those performance improvements on the older CPE just by 
> swapping the AP radio?
> 
> Chris Frost
> Director of Technology and Infrastructure
> Cruzio Internet
> 831.459.6301 x235
> 
> > On Dec 22, 2016, at 12:01 PM, G. Nicholas <gnicho...@nwnc.net> wrote:
> > 
> > Tyson,
> > 
> > Yes, The AC Prism AP will outperform the original rocket by about 70% in 
> > our opinion.  We have been doing what you are asking about in our 
> > Bloomington/Peoria market and the Prism's are great. We have both legacy M 
> > series bridges and beams as well as new AC CPE and all are performing well. 
> >  We did have a few places where we also switched out the Sector Antennas to 
> > RF 30deg horns which really lowered the noise floor.
> > 
> > Garth
> > 
> > - Original Message -
> > From: ty...@wigi.us <mailto:ty...@wigi.us>
> > Sent: 12/22/2016 1:42:33 PM
> > To: ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware Releases
> > 
> >> This may be slightly off topic but only considering it because of peoples 
> >> input on good performance of mixed ap mode on newer rocket prisms with the 
> >> new firmwares.  We have lots of 5.8 sectors with almost all nano beam m5s 
> >> connected to them and have been wanting to migrate ac clients in the mix 
> >> and upgrade the rockets aps to ac rocket prisms aps but waiting to pull 
> >> that trigger until i saw some real world examples of mixed mode working 
> >> well.  So my question is if its lopsided and mostly just m5 beam clients 
> >> and i migrate to ac clients as needed will the ac prism rockets aps 
> >> perform just as well or better than our rocket ap m5s we currently have 
> >> up? 
> >> 
> >> - Original Message - Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Firmware 
> >> Releases
> >> From: t...@nwohiobb.com <mailto:t...@nwohiobb.com>
> >> Date: 12/22/16 2:17 pm
> >> To: "James Craig" <ja...@ubnt.com <mailto:ja...@ubnt.com>>, "Ubiquiti 
> >> Users Group" <ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:ubnt_users@wispa.org>>
> >> 
> >> James
> >> is there anything I have to be worried about before upgrading my network 
> >> because I am still on 5.6.9 with powerbeams,nanostation,rocket m2/m5's.
> >> 
> >> On 2016-12-22 14:14, James Craig via Ubnt_users wrote:
> >>> Hi Keith,
> >>> 
> >>> Sending you an email for more details.
> >>> 
> >>> Also, Were these stations mostly XM based stations that wouldn't
> >>> connect, or a mix?
> >>> 
> >>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Keith Yoder <yo...@tessi.com.br>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>> We updated about 1700 radios over the weekend. Yesterday afternoon
> >>>> we sent the APs back to 5.6.9 because our phones wouldn't stop
> >>>> ringing. Symptoms where bunches of CPEs not connected. A reboot of
> >>>> the AP usually fixed things but we can't be babysitting a hundred
> >>>> APs all day long.
> >>>> 
> >>>> We had been testing the beta versions from about b15 on and hadn't
> >>>> really noticed this problem. We went from RC2 to the release
> >>>> version. (we skipped RC3)
> >>>> 
> >>>> Keith Yoder
> >>>> 
> >>>> 2016-12-22 15:27 GMT-03:00 Steve D <bigd...@gmail.com>:
> >>>> 
> >>>> Updating CPE first? Mike, you secretly started drinking the
> >>>> Ubuiquiti koolaid? You of all people are going to let them get away
> >>>> with shoddy QA? It's okay if new cpe are deployed one at a time are
> >>>> at or newer, but when doing a system wide upgrade, no f'n way. The
> >>>> damn things should be able to be newer or older and just connect and
> >>>> just work regardless.
> >>>> 
> >>>> A stone-

Re: [Ubnt_users] AirPrism GPS and Performance

[G. Nicholas]

Sam,

We are replacing all our old Rocket-M5-ti APs with the Prisms,  we like them so 
far. Still a few firmware bugs that UB is working on for mixed mode CPE support.

However per the forum, the GPS sync is only supported in the v9 alpha software. 
probably not beta until sometime in 2017.  I will leave it to Ben or Matt to 
chime in with a better time frame.

- Original Message -
From: Sam Morris
Sent: 11/2/2016 9:21:06 AM
To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
Subject: [Ubnt_users] AirPrism GPS and Performance

> Anyone using AirPrism...does the GPS Sync work on them? And other than 
> that, are you liking the AirPrism?
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> 

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] R5AC-PRISM-US

[G. Nicholas]

Evan,

Yes you have the correct pairing,  we just converted a tower site from 4 
Prism's on the UB Titanium sectors to the RF Elements 30deg horns.  Greatly 
reduced the noise floor by going to the 30deg which gave us higher SNR and more 
8x rates.  doing an ABC channel config until UB actually gets the GPS sync on 
the Prisms working.   Total capacity on the tower now is over 2 GBps.


Garth

- Original Message -
From: Evan Galvin
Sent: 9/26/2016 7:42:35 PM
To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
Subject: [Ubnt_users] R5AC-PRISM-US

> Hey guys, just wanted to confirm that the R5AC-PRISM-US has a metal
> shielded housing on it.
> 
> Do you think it would pair up good with this combo:
> 
> https://www.streakwave.com/Itemdesc.asp…
> 
> 
> https://www.streakwave.com/Itemdesc.asp?ic=SH-TP-5-30=0
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> *Evan* *Galvin*
> 
> *In Charge of What’s Next*
> 
> 
> 
> 10808 W. Monee Manhattan Road
> Monee, IL 60449
> 
> *e: Evan*@XLBroadband.com 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> *t: *815.312.4454 *w: *XLBroadband.com 
> 
> [image: Description: Description: Description:
> https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5YBKqVPD2t2VXpvNGl4OWx5b1U=download]
> [image:
> Description: Description: Description:
> https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5YBKqVPD2t2a0FfNXpyQjJQZ28=download]
> [image:
> Description: Description: Description:
> https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5YBKqVPD2t2X1FvUmw5YjJKaXc=download]
> [image:
> Description: Description: Description:
> https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5YBKqVPD2t2S1NrUDlFd2V6S1k=download]
> 

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket AC UNII-1

[G. Nicholas]

Shawn,

The new Rocket-5AC-Prism radio with the metal case and GPS port, it does 
support the full range including 5.150-5.250.  You need to go under the system 
tab and put in the activation key your company was assigned by UB to enable it.

If you are asking about the older plastic Rocket-AC-PTMP without the GPS Ant 
port, that hardware does NOT support the 5.150 UNI-1 band.

Garth

- Original Message -
From: Shawn Burgei
Sent: 9/15/2016 1:18:52 PM
To: members-boun...@wispa.org;ubnt_users@wispa.org;memb...@wispa.org
Subject: [Ubnt_users] Rocket AC UNII-1

> Does anyone know if or when they will be activating the UNII-1 for the Rocket 
> AC Prism? We are running out of channels and need to find more.
> 
> We are currently on 20 MHz we could go down to 10 MHz to help the 
> interference possibly. 
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Thanks
> Shawn 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> 

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket 5 prism

[G. Nicholas]

Rory,

Yes the Rocket 5AC-PTMP  does not do the 5.1 band, it has the plastic case with 
no GPS Antenna port.

Garth

- Original Message -
From: Rory Conaway
Sent: 8/2/2016 9:51:06 PM
To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
Subject: [Ubnt_users] Rocket 5 prism

> Was there a version that was limited to 5.4GHz as the lower band or has it 
> always covered the entire 5GHz band?  Does it work with N clients like the 
> Rocket 5ac-Lites?
> 
> Rory Conaway * Triad Wireless * CEO
> 4226 S. 37th Street * Phoenix * AZ 85040
> 602-426-0542
> r...@triadwireless.net
> www.triadwireless.net
> 
> "There are only two seasons - winter and Baseball." - Bill Veeck
> 
> 

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] dev.ubnt.com

[G. Nicholas]

I believe dev.ubnt.com is the radios checking for new firmware. This capability 
has been in the 5.x firmware for a long time.

AirCRM is the replacement for AirControl. it is curently in beta and your 
radios need to be running v5.6-cl-beta6-prod.25433 firmware to add the 
capability of the UB radios to contact the AirCRM cloud.

Garth

- Original Message -
From: Phil Curnutt
Sent: 12/13/2014 1:59:39 PM
To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] dev.ubnt.com

 This is from the radio log.  The radio is a Rocket M5 Ti, but I have seen
 this on NanoBeams as well.  We use an internal NTP.  What is AirCRM?
 
 Phil
 
 On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 wrote:
 
  Sure it isn't NTP?
 
  Josh Luthman
  Office: 937-552-2340
  Direct: 937-552-2343
  1100 Wayne St
  Suite 1337
  Troy, OH 45373
  On Dec 13, 2014 2:51 PM, Phil Curnutt pcurn...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  What is dev.ubnt.com and why are a lot of my radios trying to contact it?
 
  Phil
 
  ___
  Ubnt_users mailing list
  Ubnt_users@wispa.org
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
 
  ___
  Ubnt_users mailing list
  Ubnt_users@wispa.org
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
 
 

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] DFS for NanoBeams

[G. Nicholas]

Tim,

I think you need to get a new Rep at Streakwave.   I just logged in to their 
reseller website that shows stock quantity on hand and they have 397 of the 
NanoBridge 5G-25 USA version in stock this minute.

On NBE-M5-16 USA they have 468 in stock

They only one they are low on is the NBE-M5-19 USA they have 1 left. 

On the NanoBeam M2-400 they have 275 in stock



Garth

- Original Message -
From: Tim Reichhart
Sent: 12/12/2014 4:07:40 PM
To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] DFS for NanoBeams

 Ben
 
 I was been told over the phone by double radius and my rep from 
 streakwave/scansource and email from micro.
 
  
 
 Tim
 
  
 
 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On 
 Behalf Of Ben Moore
 Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 5:05 PM
 To: Ubiquiti Users Group
 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] DFS for NanoBeams
 
  
 
 Can you send me the emails please?  We have not stopped manufacturing these 
 at all and we have thousands here in our warehouse.
 
  
 
 On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Tim Reichhart t...@nwohiobb.com wrote:
 
 Ben
 
 I was also told by 4 masters like double radius,streakwave,scansource,micro 
 saying that they cant get them anymore and being replaced by nanobeams. 
 
  
 
 Tim
 
  
 
 From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On 
 Behalf Of Ryan Ghering
 Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 4:59 PM
 To: Ubiquiti Users Group
 Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] DFS for NanoBeams
 
  
 
 Steve, is our rep. But there is never any stock listed and when we call they 
 just sold out
 
  
 
 On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Ben Moore ben.mo...@ubnt.com wrote:
 
 Hi Ryan - 
 
  
 
 Who is your rep from Streakwave?  They have received regular shipments and 
 pulled from our US stock, so getting them should not be a problem.  
 
  
 
 Thanks,
 
 Ben
 
  
 
 On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Matt Hoppes mhop...@indigowireless.com 
 wrote:
 
 Ryan. So do I and I have not seen this shortage. 
 
 
 On Dec 12, 2014, at 4:08 PM, Ryan Ghering rgher...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I havent been able  to find any stock of nanobridges in a few months. We were 
 forced into using other brands of gear because of this in some towers. Not 
 happy And we primarily buy from baltic and streak 
 
 On Friday, December 12, 2014, Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Latest estimate is still next year. Sounds like first quarter.
 
  
 
 -Ty
 
  
 
 On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Forbes Mercy wi...@wabroadband.com wrote:
 
 I admittedly don't keep up as I should on this list so I'm probably
 bringing something up that has been talked about a lot, sorry.  I am out
 of NanoBridges and while I'd dearly like to move to NanoBeams because
 they are a much nicer radio, they are boat anchors without DFS
 capabilities.  Why it's taken longer to get this certification is beyond
 me but before I buy another few hundred NanoBridges (when I am lucky
 enough to find a supplier that still carries them) I'd like to know if
 the certification is any closer?
 
 Thanks,
 Forbes Mercy
 Washington Broadband, Inc.
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
  
 
 
 
 -- 
 Ryan Ghering
 Network Operations - Plains.Net
 Office: 970-848-0475 - Cell: 970-630-1879
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
  
 
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
 
 
 
  
 
 -- 
 
 Ryan Ghering
 Network Operations - Plains.Net
 Office: 970-848-0475 - Cell: 970-630-1879
 
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
  
 
 

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs

[G. Nicholas]

Ben,

Can you clarify something for me,  after reading the AC spec document that you 
forwarded to the list this morning, it appears the only product that has 
airprizm is the Rocket5ACPTP, which does NOT support PTMP.  The Rocket5AC-lite 
has PTMP with the new 7.1 firmware but no AirPrism or GPS support.

Right now we use Rocket M5-Ti's with GPS sync which is really needed on a tower 
with say 6-8 units for Ptmp and 2-4 backhauls, all in 5150-5250 or 5725-5850.

It appears you don't really have an AC 5Ghz solution that is going to allow us 
to get the same density.

Garth

- Original Message -
From: Ben Moore
Sent: 12/11/2014 11:51:27 AM
To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs

 The R5AC-LITE and PBE-5AC-500 are in channel.  The NBE-5AC-19, R5AC-PTP and
 PBE-5AC-620 start this month...
 
 On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Rory Conaway r...@triadwireless.net
 wrote:
 
  Are the AC products shipping yet?
 
 
 
  Rory
 
 
 
  *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
  *On Behalf Of *Ben Moore
  *Sent:* Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:00 AM
 
  *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
  *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs
 
 
 
  Sorry, this one got lost in the mix of emails.  You can see some some
  specs here:
 
 
 
  http://dl.ubnt.com/datasheets/RocketAC/Rocket5ac_DS.pdf  - page 5
 
 
 
  Thanks,
 
  Ben
 
 
 
  On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Jason Bailey j284...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  Thanks again Ben,that is exactly what I was hoping for. Not to keep
  dragging you back,but is there any data an AirPrisim specs?
  Rejection/filtering specs and such?
 
 
 
  On Wednesday, December 10, 2014 4:57 PM, Ben Moore ben.mo...@ubnt.com
  wrote:
 
 
 
  Yeah, that would be expectation...
 
 
 
  On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Mike Hammett wispaubntus...@ics-il.net
  wrote:
 
  I'd expect the same system that 5 GHz is doing.
 
 
 
  -
  Mike Hammett
  Intelligent Computing Solutions
  http://www.ics-il.com
 
  https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
  https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
  https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions
  https://twitter.com/ICSIL
  --
 
  *From: *Blair Davis the...@wmwisp.net
  *To: *Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
  *Sent: *Wednesday, December 10, 2014 3:15:50 PM
 
 
  *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs
 
  So, will the 2G AC AP's be compatable with 2G M clients?
 
  Or is it a forklift style upgrade?
 
  --
 
  On 12/10/2014 4:10 PM, Elton Wilson wrote:
 
  This is Great news!
 
 
 
  On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Ben Moore ben.mo...@ubnt.com wrote:
 
  Yes, 2GHz AC is in the works.  The 5GHz was highest priority and 2GHz is
  following.  I would expect most of the 5GHz products to roll out over next
  1-2 months and you will see 2GHz products soon after.
 
 
 
  Thanks,
 
  Ben
 
 
 
  On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Blair Davis the...@wmwisp.net wrote:
 
  What he said...
 
  I remember the comments about Air Prisim supposed to be coming to 2GHz
  also...
 
  --
 
  On 12/9/2014 5:25 PM, Jason Bailey wrote:
 
  Speaking of M2, Ben,can you speak on 2.4 GHz rockets with AirPrisim? I
  recall Robert saying the 2.4 was easy,the 5 GHz was the challenge.
 
 
 
  We who are blessed with hills and trees use 5 GHz for BackHaul and 2.4 for
  ptmp and need something to help mitigate self-interference asap!
 
 
 
  We have started looking at gps options because we have not heard a peep.
  Are we expecting something soon?
 
 
 
  On Tuesday, December 9, 2014 5:21 PM, j...@spitwspots.com
  j...@spitwspots.com j...@spitwspots.com j...@spitwspots.com wrote:
 
 
 
  Not an m2 lolz
 
  On December 9, 2014 1:07:11 PM AKST, Josh Luthman
  j...@imaginenetworksllc.com j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
 
  So NSM2 and Nanobeam-400 will work with the new 802.11ac Rockets, correct?
 
 
 
 
  Josh Luthman
  Office: 937-552-2340
  Direct: 937-552-2343
  1100 Wayne St
  Suite 1337
  Troy, OH 45373
 
 
 
  On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Ben Moore ben.mo...@ubnt.com wrote:
 
  11n CPE's will have ability to work with 11AC AP's...This will allow you
  to transition a tower.  Note that 11ac speeds will not be as good as 100%
  AC network, but 11ac CPE's that you deploy will still be better than 11n.
 
 
 
  On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.net wrote:
 
  That's what I've been assuming too...
 
  Ben, can you tell us whether it's going to be backwards compatibility
  added to the AC series, or forward compatibility added to the M series?
  --
 
  *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on
  behalf of Mike Hammett [wispaubntus...@ics-il.net]
  *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2014 2:36 PM
  *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
  *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs
 
  I'm guessing it'll be like M series vs. legacy. Eventually V6 will be the
  M-series connection to the AC.   I'm guessing...
 
 
 
  

Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT SILENCE ?? was New airControl

[G. Nicholas]

Kees,

I do not think Robert Pera follows this list, but he did respond to AirCRM 
concerns on the Ubiquiti forum:


Hi Guys --

Thanks for all the feedback.  Here are some quick thoughts from our side:

1. The goal behind our CRM solution is to level the playing field between Tier 
1 operators and you guys.  We have invested significant RD resources over the 
past couple years towards providing powerful business software technology which 
would allow your businesses and networks to scale faster and more efficiently.  
Our goal has always been to accelerate the growth of our entire Industry and 
make you guys more successful.

2. We have some powerful features planned that take advantage of the 
centralized hosting and that is why we decided on a cloud framework

3. A significant piece of Ubiquiti's DNA is about listening to our community.  
We hear the message about the local hosting requirement loud and clear.  We 
have started on it now and will have solution for local hosting

Consider what we have available now as an option to try out.  For those of you 
that will hold off until the local hosting option is available, please feel 
free to try out the UI and direction and let us know what you think.

Thanks,

Robert



- Original Message -
From: Kees H
Sent: 12/4/2014 10:41:53 AM
To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNT SILENCE ??  was  New airControl

 Matt @ UBNT
 
 I do believe it is time for you to go to the upper management and have them 
 make a comment.  The issues that have been so elequently stated in this and 
 other posts in this last week need to be addressed.  The silence from UBNT 
 is deafening and shakes my confidence in UBNT.
 
 Please keep us informed.
 
 
  Guys, you have good points. I believe though, the problem here isn't
  just the product, it's the message.  The reality is that it wouldn't
  take that many more resources to finish and update AC2.  I thought it
  had a bunch of bells and whistles I could have lived without and that
  functionality was more important but that wasn't my call.  We fudged
  through its inadequacies with the hope that upgrades were coming.
  Unfortunately, the Cone of Silence from Ubiquiti on this issue after
  more than a year caused me anghst.  I can see where this product works
  for newcomers to the industry as a billing and CRM product.  But I do
  agree that those operators that have more than a few hundred users are
  going to have serious qualms about opening up their network to an
  outside attack or even the possibility that there is some aspect of
  security that is out of their control.  We pay a lot of money every year
  for security products to protect our customers and although we are going
  to test and probably startup WISPs to this product, I don't see it as a
  large operational management tool specifically because of the unknown
  control issue.  If Russia can hack our SCADA system, probably the North
  Koreans can hack Sony, the Chinese pretty much anything they want to
  including our most secured military and technical secrets, I'm a little
  nervous letting some outside entity control my network.
 
  Here is my question, if the cloud gets hacked and someone takes down my
  network causing me great financial harm (kind of like Green toughcable),
  who am I suing?  I know the same argument can be made for AirControl now
  but that device should be behind a firewall with security at the
  operating system level managed by the WISP.  The exposure is far lower.
 
  Rory
 
  -Original Message-
  From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org]
  On Behalf Of Robert
  Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2014 6:25 PM
  To: Ubiquiti Users Group
  Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl
 
  Hmmm,  I think someone is really trying hard to emulate Steve Jobs...
  He always knew what his customers _really_ needed...   Sometimes he was
  spot on...  Sometimes he tried to float bricks...  Didn't hear about
  those products...
 
  On 12/03/2014 05:14 PM, Chris Ruschmann wrote:
  Well said.
 
  In the alpha forums we gave them every possible combination of onsite
  hosting that you could think of that we would be happy to use for this
 
  project. Virtual appliances  and an actual hardware appliances that
  they sell were 2 that I thought would be the easiest.
 
  Fell on deaf ears though.
 
  *From:*ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
  mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
  [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
  mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Justin Wilson
  *Sent:* Wednesday, December 3, 2014 2:38 PM
  *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group
  *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl
 
  Part of it for me is the perception of UBNT as a company.  We aren't
  like Apple consumers.  For the most part, most of us are not buying
  these products to jack with them at Starbucks and drink Coffee.  We
  are
  out on towers, in all kinds of weather, deploying these.   No matter
  the
  driving factor,