According to the OpenWrt site:
old boards (XM) use the ar724x chip while new ones (XW) are using the ar934x
chip.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 6:48 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos?
I think you need a certain firmware for XM - XW WDS to work.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions
https://twitter.com/ICSIL
_
From: Rory Conaway r...@triadwireless.net
To: Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 5:47:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos?
Right now everything talks to everyone else. I’m just trying to figure out if
the NS5ML has the newer, faster, processor.
Rory
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Blair Davis
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 4:39 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos?
So then, what version of firmware is needed on my XM AP's to talk with XW
clients?
Are there limits on XM AP's talking to mixed XM, XW and legacy 4.02 clients?
--
On 11/10/2014 6:33 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Yup.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Nov 10, 2014 6:30 PM, Blair Davis the...@wmwisp.net wrote:
Isn't the XW for one CPU and the XM for a different CPU?
--
On 11/10/2014 6:06 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
It's a free upgrade essentially. They didn't want to make a new product since
they sell a couple dozen of them every month.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Nov 10, 2014 6:03 PM, Rory Conaway r...@triadwireless.net wrote:
I’m trying to figure out why they use XW firmware when other nanostations use
xm firmware. If they have faster processors, that’s important for network
design.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mathew Howard
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 3:49 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos?
oh... yeah, I read that wrong.
don't mind me, my brain is slightly non-functional today...
_
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of
Mike Hammett [wispaubntus...@ics-il.net]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 4:47 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos?
I think that's what Rory was saying.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions
https://twitter.com/ICSIL
_
From: Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.net
To: Ubiquiti Users Group ubnt_users@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 4:42:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos?
I'm pretty sure the XW Locos/NanoStations and Rockets already support DFS...
it's just the NanoBeam/PowerBeam that doesn't.
_
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of
Rory Conaway [r...@triadwireless.net]
Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2014 6:51 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos?
We can’t use them yet until DFS, all our APs are there.
Rory
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Reynolds
Sent: Sunday, November 9, 2014 5:48 PM
To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos?
We haven't received any XW locos/nanos/nanobridges/rockets yet, except for
RocketM5-Ti XW's.
Our nanobeams that we have as CPEs are working just fine with RocketM5 APs. No
low rates, good ccq, no WDS problems. Running 5.5.9 on the nanobeams, and 5.5.8
or 5.5.10 on the RocketM5's.
Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com
On 11/09/2014 03:40 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Yes and Ubnt APs. Nsm5 I think was our problem. Replaced with a beam5 and I
could bridge again.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Nov 9, 2014 7:27 PM, Adair Winter ada...@amarillowireless.net wrote:
WDS issues with non ubiquiti ap's?
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
wrote:
Probably since the Nanobeams definitely have WDS issues.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Nov 9, 2014 7:19 PM, Mike Hammett
