[Bug 663457] Re: DistUpgraders output window should be resizable and initial size should fit the screen
Bug still present while upgrading (dist-upgrade) from 21.04 to 21.10 the window (ui) is not resizable after the details window is enlarged (with > button). Cannot see or click the bottom buttons in the "Distribution Upgrade (as superuser)" window. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/663457 Title: DistUpgraders output window should be resizable and initial size should fit the screen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/663457/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1946368] Re: HDMI output freezes under current/proposed impish kernels
@knoedelfan The fix is not already there. You have "5.13.0-1008-raspi #9-Ubuntu" released on 2021-10-11. When you "install" now you see "linux-raspi is already the newest version". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946368 Title: HDMI output freezes under current/proposed impish kernels To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi/+bug/1946368/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1939625] Re: DNS setting in network-manager is ignored
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939625 Title: DNS setting in network-manager is ignored To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1939625/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1930460] Re: HP Probook 470 G5 does not wake from sleep (just a black screen)
[Expired for linux (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930460 Title: HP Probook 470 G5 does not wake from sleep (just a black screen) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1930460/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1939577] Re: Missing dependency in libvirt-guests.service leads sometimes to killed VMs on host shutdown
[Expired for libvirt (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939577 Title: Missing dependency in libvirt-guests.service leads sometimes to killed VMs on host shutdown To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1939577/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1940784] Re: Keyboard layout isn't updated till installation completes
[Expired for ubiquity (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940784 Title: Keyboard layout isn't updated till installation completes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1940784/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1945803] Re: a2jmidid: building on RISC-V fails
This bug was fixed in the package a2jmidid - 9-2ubuntu1 --- a2jmidid (9-2ubuntu1) jammy; urgency=medium * Enable building on RISC-V (LP: #1945803) -- Heinrich Schuchardt Fri, 01 Oct 2021 16:19:25 +0200 ** Changed in: a2jmidid (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945803 Title: a2jmidid: building on RISC-V fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/a2jmidid/+bug/1945803/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1916250] Re: gir1.2-signon-2.0 needs to declare replace on older releases (Groovy2Hirsute and Focal2Jammy)
This bug was fixed in the package libsignon-glib - 2.1-3ubuntu1 --- libsignon-glib (2.1-3ubuntu1) jammy; urgency=medium * add replaces relationship to gir1.2-signon-2.0 package. LP: #1916250 -- Rolf Leggewie Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:52:20 +0100 ** Changed in: libsignon-glib (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916250 Title: gir1.2-signon-2.0 needs to declare replace on older releases (Groovy2Hirsute and Focal2Jammy) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsignon-glib/+bug/1916250/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948513] [NEW] window response slow
Public bug reported: 1) lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 21.10 Release:21.10 2)apt-cache policy rhythmbox rhythmbox: インストールされているバージョン: 3.4.4-1ubuntu5 3) UI responds to scrolls and clicks within 1 second at the latest. 4) UI response is slow. It takes 2-5 seconds to respond to scrolls and clicks. There is no problem immediately after startup, but after a while the response slows down. It takes about 30 seconds after startup to operate at normal response speed. When I restart the application, the response is just as slow. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10 Package: rhythmbox 3.4.4-1ubuntu5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-20.20-generic 5.13.14 Uname: Linux 5.13.0-20-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu70 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Sat Oct 23 12:59:25 2021 InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-11-05 (351 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.10 "Groovy Gorilla" - Release amd64 (20201022) ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: rhythmbox UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to impish on 2021-10-23 (0 days ago) ** Affects: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug impish ** Attachment added: "system-monitor cpu usage" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948513/+attachment/5535366/+files/Screenshot%20from%202021-10-23%2013-06-12.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948513 Title: window response slow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/1948513/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1947553] Re: wrong panel size 21.10
Alberts, thank you for fixing this upstream. I hope this fix will be in 22.04 :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947553 Title: wrong panel size 21.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-panel/+bug/1947553/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1738251]
Dear bugcatcher1, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1738251 Title: [upstream] Missing Data when Copying from Clipboard to Writer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1738251/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948511] [NEW] Very low volume output: Realtek ALC1222 in Omen 30L desktop
Public bug reported: Volume at 100% + Speaker knob at 100% and I get barely audio than can be barely heard. Alsa Info link: http://alsa- project.org/db/?f=5bf0f297f3700c75db822f78d563962f563f355c ``` lspci 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Device 9b33 (rev 05) 00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 6th-10th Gen Core Processor PCIe Controller (x16) (rev 05) 00:12.0 Signal processing controller: Intel Corporation Comet Lake PCH Thermal Controller 00:14.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation Comet Lake USB 3.1 xHCI Host Controller 00:14.2 RAM memory: Intel Corporation Comet Lake PCH Shared SRAM 00:14.3 Network controller: Intel Corporation Comet Lake PCH CNVi WiFi 00:16.0 Communication controller: Intel Corporation Comet Lake HECI Controller 00:17.0 SATA controller: Intel Corporation Comet Lake SATA AHCI Controller 00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Device 06bc (rev f0) 00:1d.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Comet Lake PCI Express Root Port #9 (rev f0) 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation Device 0685 00:1f.3 Audio device: Intel Corporation Comet Lake PCH cAVS 00:1f.4 SMBus: Intel Corporation Comet Lake PCH SMBus Controller 00:1f.5 Serial bus controller [0c80]: Intel Corporation Comet Lake PCH SPI Controller 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GA102 [GeForce RTX 3090] (rev a1) 01:00.1 Audio device: NVIDIA Corporation GA102 High Definition Audio Controller (rev a1) 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 16) 03:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Sandisk Corp WD Black SN750 / PC SN730 NVMe SSD ``` ``` sudo dmesg | grep snd [6.624036] snd_hda_intel :00:1f.3: enabling device (0100 -> 0102) [6.624372] snd_hda_intel :01:00.1: enabling device (0100 -> 0102) [6.624423] snd_hda_intel :01:00.1: Disabling MSI [6.624426] snd_hda_intel :01:00.1: Handle vga_switcheroo audio client [6.776175] snd_hda_codec_realtek hdaudioC0D0: autoconfig for ALC1220: line_outs=1 (0x1b/0x0/0x0/0x0/0x0) type:line [6.776179] snd_hda_codec_realtek hdaudioC0D0:speaker_outs=0 (0x0/0x0/0x0/0x0/0x0) [6.776181] snd_hda_codec_realtek hdaudioC0D0:hp_outs=1 (0x14/0x0/0x0/0x0/0x0) [6.776182] snd_hda_codec_realtek hdaudioC0D0:mono: mono_out=0x0 [6.776183] snd_hda_codec_realtek hdaudioC0D0:inputs: [6.776184] snd_hda_codec_realtek hdaudioC0D0: Rear Mic=0x18 [6.776186] snd_hda_codec_realtek hdaudioC0D0: Front Mic=0x19 [6.776187] snd_hda_codec_realtek hdaudioC0D0: Mic=0x1a [6.776188] snd_hda_codec_realtek hdaudioC0D0: Line=0x15 ``` ``` cat /proc/asound/car*/co* | grep Codec Codec: Realtek ALC1220 Codec: Nvidia GPU 9a HDMI/DP ``` ** Affects: alsa-driver (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: 30l alc1222 omen realtek -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948511 Title: Very low volume output: Realtek ALC1222 in Omen 30L desktop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1948511/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1786013] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-meta-gcp/5.11.0.1022.22)
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-meta-gcp (5.11.0.1022.22) for hirsute have finished running. The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package: glibc/2.33-0ubuntu5 (amd64) Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1]. https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/hirsute/update_excuses.html#linux-meta-gcp [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786013 Title: Packaging resync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1944946] Re: Path of open-vm-tools libdeployPkgPlugin.so is now multi-arch compliant breaking cloud-init
The issue is fixed when check it in the following images. 1) ubuntu 20.04.3 desktop GA (-proposed repo) 2) ubuntu 21.04 desktop GA. (-proposed repo) 3) ubuntu 21.10 desktop GA 4) ubuntu 21.10 live server GA 5) ubuntu 21.10 cloud image -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1944946 Title: Path of open-vm-tools libdeployPkgPlugin.so is now multi-arch compliant breaking cloud-init To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1944946/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1786013] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-meta-aws/5.4.0.1059.62)
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-meta-aws (5.4.0.1059.62) for focal have finished running. The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package: backport-iwlwifi-dkms/8324-0ubuntu3~20.04.4 (arm64, amd64) Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1]. https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/focal/update_excuses.html#linux-meta-aws [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786013 Title: Packaging resync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1528421] Re: Erro ao Atualizar do 14.04 para 15.04
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1534374 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1534374 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1534374, so it is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1534374 unable to upgrade to 15.04 due to libstdc++6 SRU -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528421 Title: Erro ao Atualizar do 14.04 para 15.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1528421/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1930756] Re: regression: virtiofsd in qemu-system-common fails selinux related xattr
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930756 Title: regression: virtiofsd in qemu-system-common fails selinux related xattr To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1930756/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1941798] Re: Focal update: v5.4.140 upstream stable release
this update caused a regression in ch341 driver: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1947780 already fixed upstream, just needs to apply the upstream patch (which is a revert of the original change). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1941798 Title: Focal update: v5.4.140 upstream stable release To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1941798/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1947780] Re: Kernel module ch341 bug
this update caused a regression: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1941798 commit in question is https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu- kernel/ubuntu/+source/linux/+git/focal/commit/drivers/usb/serial/ch341.c?id=5e940f519a0d7ef1857b51b6ce3eb2a6731d9b26 the issue was reported upstream https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214131 and reverted in https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/johan/usb- serial.git/commit/?h=usb- linus=df7b16d1c00ecb3da3a30c999cdb39f273c99a2f this commit needs to be brought in ** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #214131 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214131 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947780 Title: Kernel module ch341 bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1947780/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1786013] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-meta-hwe-5.11/5.11.0.40.44~20.04.18)
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-meta-hwe-5.11 (5.11.0.40.44~20.04.18) for focal have finished running. The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package: backport-iwlwifi-dkms/8324-0ubuntu3~20.04.4 (amd64, arm64, ppc64el) systemd/245.4-4ubuntu3.13 (amd64, s390x, ppc64el) glibc/2.31-0ubuntu9.2 (amd64) nvidia-graphics-drivers-340/340.108-0ubuntu5.20.04.2 (amd64) Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1]. https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/focal/update_excuses.html#linux-meta-hwe-5.11 [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786013 Title: Packaging resync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1798905] Re: do-release-upgrade completed with errors and told me to report it.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1898152 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898152 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1898152, so it is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1898152 upgrade fails to calculate if gnuradio-dev is installed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1798905 Title: do-release-upgrade completed with errors and told me to report it. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1798905/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1809549] Re: third party enabled
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1384946 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1384946 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1384946, so it is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1384946 Trying to upgrade to utopic, cannot compute changes due to gnuplot -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1809549 Title: third party enabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1809549/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1938207] Re: ubuntu-advantage-tools.postinst and cloud-id are not robust against failure
Hello Robie, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.3~16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- xenial to verification-done-xenial. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-xenial. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938207 Title: ubuntu-advantage-tools.postinst and cloud-id are not robust against failure To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1938207/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1939932] Re: Ubuntu PRO Focal on AWS and Azure should not install the generic FIPS kernel via ubuntu-fips metapackage
Hello Chad, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.3~16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- xenial to verification-done-xenial. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-xenial. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939932 Title: Ubuntu PRO Focal on AWS and Azure should not install the generic FIPS kernel via ubuntu-fips metapackage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1939932/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1939449] Re: Ubuntu Pro UA fails to enable fips-updates on 20.04
Hello Brad, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.3~16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- xenial to verification-done-xenial. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-xenial. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939449 Title: Ubuntu Pro UA fails to enable fips-updates on 20.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1939449/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1944676] Re: Ubuntu ESM not working in WSL
Hello Marc, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.3~16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- xenial to verification-done-xenial. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-xenial. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1944676 Title: Ubuntu ESM not working in WSL To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1944676/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1942929] Re: [SRU] ubuntu-advantage-tools (27.2.2 -> 27.3) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute
Hello Grant, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.3~16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- xenial to verification-done-xenial. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-xenial. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942929 Title: [SRU] ubuntu-advantage-tools (27.2.2 -> 27.3) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1942929/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1940131] Re: sudo ua attach is not working
Hello slava, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.3~16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- xenial to verification-done-xenial. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-xenial. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940131 Title: sudo ua attach is not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1940131/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1938207] Re: ubuntu-advantage-tools.postinst and cloud-id are not robust against failure
** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938207 Title: ubuntu-advantage-tools.postinst and cloud-id are not robust against failure To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1938207/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1939932] Re: Ubuntu PRO Focal on AWS and Azure should not install the generic FIPS kernel via ubuntu-fips metapackage
** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939932 Title: Ubuntu PRO Focal on AWS and Azure should not install the generic FIPS kernel via ubuntu-fips metapackage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1939932/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1898794] Re: Can't upgrade using gui tool or do-release-upgrade
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1813354 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1813354 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1813354, so it is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1813354 release-upgrader unable to deal with sources.list entries of "deb mirror://" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898794 Title: Can't upgrade using gui tool or do-release-upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1898794/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1899711] Re: -upgrater-core 1.17.10.8 ( orgin unknow ) problem type Bug
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1813354 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1813354 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1899708 -upgrater-core 1.17.10.8 ( orgin unknow ) problem type Bug ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1813354 release-upgrader unable to deal with sources.list entries of "deb mirror://" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899711 Title: -upgrater-core 1.17.10.8 ( orgin unknow ) problem type Bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1899711/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1899708] Re: -upgrater-core 1.17.10.8 ( orgin unknow ) problem type Bug
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1813354 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1813354 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1813354, so it is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1813354 release-upgrader unable to deal with sources.list entries of "deb mirror://" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899708 Title: -upgrater-core 1.17.10.8 ( orgin unknow ) problem type Bug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1899708/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1901238] Re: Upgrade fails from 20.04 to 20.10 because of ubunt-minimal not found in repositories
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1813354 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1813354 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1813354, so it is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1813354 release-upgrader unable to deal with sources.list entries of "deb mirror://" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901238 Title: Upgrade fails from 20.04 to 20.10 because of ubunt-minimal not found in repositories To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1901238/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1903387] Re: Ubuntu failed to upgrade from Ubuntu 20.04 LTS to 20.10
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1813354 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1813354 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1813354, so it is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1813354 release-upgrader unable to deal with sources.list entries of "deb mirror://" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903387 Title: Ubuntu failed to upgrade from Ubuntu 20.04 LTS to 20.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1903387/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1904358] Re: Attempted to upgrade got an error about packages. going to disable, and retry.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1813354 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1813354 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1813354, so it is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1813354 release-upgrader unable to deal with sources.list entries of "deb mirror://" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904358 Title: Attempted to upgrade got an error about packages. going to disable, and retry. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1904358/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948505] Status changed to Confirmed
This change was made by a bot. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948505 Title: Screen Brightness keys do not work on Lenovo IdeaPad 3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1948505/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1924839] Re: Can't upgrade from 18.04 to 20.x
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1889250 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889250 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1889250, so it is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1889250 Unable to calculate the upgrade to 20.04 due to nodejs from nodesource -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1924839 Title: Can't upgrade from 18.04 to 20.x To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1924839/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1926082] Re: ppa issue when upgrading from 18 to 20
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1889250 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889250 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1889250, so it is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1889250 Unable to calculate the upgrade to 20.04 due to nodejs from nodesource -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926082 Title: ppa issue when upgrading from 18 to 20 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1926082/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1930083] Re: Update does not work.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1813354 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1813354 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1813354, so it is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1813354 release-upgrader unable to deal with sources.list entries of "deb mirror://" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930083 Title: Update does not work. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1930083/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1938908] Re: Backport the container stack in Impish
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected, Accepted opengcs into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opengcs/0.3.4+dfsg2-0ubuntu3.18.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: opengcs (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938908 Title: Backport the container stack in Impish To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/containerd/+bug/1938908/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1933501] Re: An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1889250 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889250 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1889250, so it is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1889250 Unable to calculate the upgrade to 20.04 due to nodejs from nodesource -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1933501 Title: An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1933501/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1938204] Re: Not able to update new Ubuntu release
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1813354 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1813354 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1813354, so it is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1813354 release-upgrader unable to deal with sources.list entries of "deb mirror://" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938204 Title: Not able to update new Ubuntu release To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1938204/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1942436] Re: ubuntu 18.04.5 wont upgrade to 20.04.3
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1889250 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889250 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1889250, so it is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1889250 Unable to calculate the upgrade to 20.04 due to nodejs from nodesource -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942436 Title: ubuntu 18.04.5 wont upgrade to 20.04.3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1942436/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1938348] Re: sudo do-release-upgrade
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1889250 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889250 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1889250, so it is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1889250 Unable to calculate the upgrade to 20.04 due to nodejs from nodesource -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938348 Title: sudo do-release-upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1938348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1938619] Re: General upgrade failure, trying to view log to figure out what happened. Upgrading via CLI
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1813354 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1813354 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1813354, so it is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1813354 release-upgrader unable to deal with sources.list entries of "deb mirror://" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938619 Title: General upgrade failure, trying to view log to figure out what happened. Upgrading via CLI To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1938619/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1941604] Re: Crash during update from ubuntu 18 to 20
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1889250 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889250 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1889250, so it is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1889250 Unable to calculate the upgrade to 20.04 due to nodejs from nodesource -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1941604 Title: Crash during update from ubuntu 18 to 20 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1941604/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1947986] Re: Updating from Ubuntu 18.04 to Ubuntu 20.04 LTS fails
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1889250 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889250 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1889250, so it is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1889250 Unable to calculate the upgrade to 20.04 due to nodejs from nodesource -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947986 Title: Updating from Ubuntu 18.04 to Ubuntu 20.04 LTS fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1947986/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948505] [NEW] Screen Brightness keys do not work on Lenovo IdeaPad 3
Public bug reported: I've installed Ubuntu 21.10 with recent updates from scratch, and screen brightness control hot keys do not work. I can adjust brightness with slide bar in settings, and also with $ echo 2000 | sudo tee /sys/class/backlight/intel_backlight/brightness Both acpi_listen and 'sudo showkey' commands show no events, not even in a console. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10 Package: linux-image-5.13.0-20-generic 5.13.0-20.20 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-20.20-generic 5.13.14 Uname: Linux 5.13.0-20-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu70 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: lex1476 F pulseaudio CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Fri Oct 22 19:24:38 2021 InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-10-21 (1 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.10 "Impish Indri" - Release amd64 (20211012) MachineType: LENOVO 82H7 ProcFB: 0 i915drmfb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-5.13.0-20-generic root=/dev/mapper/vgubuntu-root ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-5.13.0-20-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-5.13.0-20-generic N/A linux-firmware 1.201 SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 01/13/2021 dmi.bios.release: 1.20 dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO dmi.bios.version: GGCN20WW dmi.board.asset.tag: NO Asset Tag dmi.board.name: LNVNB161216 dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO dmi.board.version: NO DPK dmi.chassis.asset.tag: NO Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO dmi.chassis.version: IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 dmi.ec.firmware.release: 1.20 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrGGCN20WW:bd01/13/2021:br1.20:efr1.20:svnLENOVO:pn82H7:pvrIdeaPad314ITL6:skuLENOVO_MT_82H7_BU_idea_FM_IdeaPad314ITL6:rvnLENOVO:rnLNVNB161216:rvrNODPK:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrIdeaPad314ITL6: dmi.product.family: IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 dmi.product.name: 82H7 dmi.product.sku: LENOVO_MT_82H7_BU_idea_FM_IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 dmi.product.version: IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug impish wayland-session ** Description changed: I've installed Ubuntu 21.10 with recent updates from scratch, and screen brightness control hot keys do not work. I can adjust brightness with slide bar in settings, and also with - $ echo 2000 | sudo tee /sys/class/backlight/intel_backlight/brightness + $ echo 2000 | sudo tee /sys/class/backlight/intel_backlight/brightness Both acpi_listen and 'sudo showkey' commands show no events, not even in a console. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10 Package: linux-image-5.13.0-20-generic 5.13.0-20.20 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-20.20-generic 5.13.14 Uname: Linux 5.13.0-20-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu70 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: - USERPID ACCESS COMMAND - /dev/snd/controlC0: lex1476 F pulseaudio + USERPID ACCESS COMMAND + /dev/snd/controlC0: lex1476 F pulseaudio CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Fri Oct 22 19:24:38 2021 InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-10-21 (1 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.10 "Impish Indri" - Release amd64 (20211012) MachineType: LENOVO 82H7 ProcFB: 0 i915drmfb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-5.13.0-20-generic root=/dev/mapper/vgubuntu-root ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 RelatedPackageVersions: - linux-restricted-modules-5.13.0-20-generic N/A - linux-backports-modules-5.13.0-20-generic N/A - linux-firmware 1.201 + linux-restricted-modules-5.13.0-20-generic N/A + linux-backports-modules-5.13.0-20-generic N/A + linux-firmware 1.201 SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 01/13/2021 dmi.bios.release: 1.20 dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO dmi.bios.version: GGCN20WW dmi.board.asset.tag: NO Asset Tag dmi.board.name: LNVNB161216 dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO dmi.board.version: NO DPK dmi.chassis.asset.tag: NO Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO dmi.chassis.version: IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 dmi.ec.firmware.release: 1.20 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrGGCN20WW:bd01/13/2021:br1.20:efr1.20:svnLENOVO:pn82H7:pvrIdeaPad314ITL6:skuLENOVO_MT_82H7_BU_idea_FM_IdeaPad314ITL6:rvnLENOVO:rnLNVNB161216:rvrNODPK:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrIdeaPad314ITL6: dmi.product.family: IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 dmi.product.name: 82H7 dmi.product.sku: LENOVO_MT_82H7_BU_idea_FM_IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 dmi.product.version: IdeaPad 3 14ITL6 dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948505 Title: Screen Brightness keys do not work on Lenovo IdeaPad 3 To manage notifications
[Bug 1901553] Proposed package upload rejected
An upload of grub2 to bionic-proposed has been rejected from the upload queue for the following reason: "The debdiff for this is a mess, there is delta to all the packages under debian/patches, impossible to review; please reupload without the extra delta". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901553 Title: Improve documentation around initrdless boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1901553/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1925507] Proposed package upload rejected
An upload of grub2 to bionic-proposed has been rejected from the upload queue for the following reason: "The debdiff for this is a mess, there is delta to all the packages under debian/patches, impossible to review; please reupload without the extra delta". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925507 Title: grub-common: snapd autopkgtests fail on s390x To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapd/+bug/1925507/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929860] Proposed package upload rejected
An upload of grub2 to bionic-proposed has been rejected from the upload queue for the following reason: "The debdiff for this is a mess, there is delta to all the packages under debian/patches, impossible to review; please reupload without the extra delta". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929860 Title: initrdfail can result in resuming with different initrd images and hanging resume To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1929860/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1786013] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-meta-bluefield/5.4.0.1021.22)
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-meta-bluefield (5.4.0.1021.22) for focal have finished running. The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package: fwts/unknown (arm64) backport-iwlwifi-dkms/8324-0ubuntu3~20.04.4 (arm64) mali-midgard/unknown (arm64) Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1]. https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/focal/update_excuses.html#linux-meta-bluefield [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786013 Title: Packaging resync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948460] Re: unable to upgrade into 21.04 to 21.10
Reviewing the log file, /var/log/dist-upgrade/main.log, from your upgrade attempt there was a failure to communicate with the mirror of the Ubuntu archive which you use. This could either be due to an issue with your connection to the mirror or with the mirror itself. Regardless, this is an issue you'll need to sort out by fixing your network connection or switching to a different mirror of the Ubuntu archive before the upgrade can complete. If after resolving the communication error with the mirror you are still unable to upgrade to a new release of Ubuntu please open a new bug report so we'll have fresh log files. Thanks and good luck! ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete ** Tags added: connection-refused -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948460 Title: unable to upgrade into 21.04 to 21.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1948460/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1947977] Re: 'ubuntu-minimal' could not be located during release upgrade
It looks like there was a transitory issue connecting to the mirror of the Ubuntu archive you use. 2021-10-21 11:42:01,876 DEBUG examining: 'deb http://ke.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ focal main restricted' 2021-10-21 11:42:01,876 DEBUG verifySourcesListEntry: deb http://ke.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ hirsute main restricted 2021-10-21 11:42:01,876 DEBUG url_downloadable: http://ke.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu//dists/hirsute/Release 2021-10-21 11:42:01,876 DEBUG s='http' n='ke.archive.ubuntu.com' p='/ubuntu//dists/hirsute/Release' q='' f='' 2021-10-21 11:42:02,040 DEBUG error from httplib: 'HTTP Error 500: Internal Server Error' ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947977 Title: 'ubuntu-minimal' could not be located during release upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1947977/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948460] Re: unable to upgrade into 21.04 to 21.10
** Summary changed: - unable to upgrade into 21.04 to 21.40 + unable to upgrade into 21.04 to 21.10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948460 Title: unable to upgrade into 21.04 to 21.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1948460/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1946304] Re: amdgpu: Add initial firmware for navi24 Beige Goby
Hello You-Sheng, or anyone else affected, Accepted linux-firmware into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux- firmware/1.187.20 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946304 Title: amdgpu: Add initial firmware for navi24 Beige Goby To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/1946304/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1947829] Re: Cannot identified WLAN card MT7921 in Ubunut OS with Install OS complete first OOBE Boot OS
Hello You-Sheng, or anyone else affected, Accepted linux-firmware into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux- firmware/1.187.20 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947829 Title: Cannot identified WLAN card MT7921 in Ubunut OS with Install OS complete first OOBE Boot OS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/1947829/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948497] Re: [SRU] plasma-optimus has abnormally high power usage and has menu issues
** Changed in: plasma-optimus (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948497 Title: [SRU] plasma-optimus has abnormally high power usage and has menu issues To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-optimus/+bug/1948497/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948504] Status changed to Confirmed
This change was made by a bot. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948504 Title: [Lenovo P52s] Unable to WiFi connect to Inseego Wavemaker 5G FX2000 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1948504/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1922414] Re: ssh-agent fails to start (has_option: command not found)
This is still broken on impish when running i3 under X11. Oct 22 15:23:39 operations /usr/libexec/gdm-x-session[5615]: /etc/X11/Xsession.d/30x11-common_xresources: line 16: has_option: command not found Oct 22 15:23:39 operations /usr/libexec/gdm-x-session[5646]: /etc/X11/Xsession.d/75dbus_dbus-launch: line 9: has_option: command not found Oct 22 15:23:39 operations /usr/libexec/gdm-x-session[5658]: /etc/X11/Xsession.d/90x11-common_ssh-agent: line 9: has_option: command not found -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1922414 Title: ssh-agent fails to start (has_option: command not found) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1922414/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1786013] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-meta-aws/5.11.0.1021.22)
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-meta-aws (5.11.0.1021.22) for hirsute have finished running. The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package: glibc/2.33-0ubuntu5 (arm64) systemd/247.3-3ubuntu3.6 (amd64) Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1]. https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/hirsute/update_excuses.html#linux-meta-aws [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786013 Title: Packaging resync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948504] [NEW] [Lenovo P52s] Unable to WiFi connect to Inseego Wavemaker 5G FX2000
Public bug reported: 1) lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 21.10 Release:21.10 2) uname -a Linux worldpeacepc 5.13.0-21-generic #21-Ubuntu SMP Tue Oct 19 08:59:28 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 3) What is expected to happen is when I click the top right hand side of the GUI, choose the SSID associated with the Inseego Wavemaker 5G FX2000, put in the known good password, it connects. 4) What happens instead is it fails to connect. Same problem in Ubuntu 21.04. However, I'm able to connect to other SSIDs from other non-Inseego devices. An iPhone 12 Mini and Windows 10 devices have no problems connecting. What I tried but it didn't change anything: 1) Disable ipv6 in Ubuntu. 2) In the Inseego GUI, change from: 5GHz 802.11acn/ax to: 5GHz 802.11ac WORKAROUND: In the Inseego GUI changing the WiFi security from: WPA3/WPA2 Transition to: WPA2 Personal PSK (AES) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10 Package: linux-image-5.13.0-21-generic 5.13.0-21.21 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-21.21-generic 5.13.18 Uname: Linux 5.13.0-21-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu70 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: moniker1825 F pulseaudio CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Fri Oct 22 16:07:37 2021 InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-08-25 (58 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.2.0 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20210209.1) MachineType: LENOVO 20LB001FUS ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm-256color PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcFB: 0 i915drmfb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-5.13.0-21-generic root=/dev/mapper/vgubuntu-root ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-5.13.0-21-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-5.13.0-21-generic N/A linux-firmware 1.201 SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 08/13/2021 dmi.bios.release: 1.29 dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO dmi.bios.version: N27ET43W (1.29 ) dmi.board.asset.tag: Not Available dmi.board.name: 20LB001FUS dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO dmi.board.version: SDK0J40697 WIN dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO dmi.chassis.version: None dmi.ec.firmware.release: 1.15 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrN27ET43W(1.29):bd08/13/2021:br1.29:efr1.15:svnLENOVO:pn20LB001FUS:pvrThinkPadP52s:rvnLENOVO:rn20LB001FUS:rvrSDK0J40697WIN:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNone:skuLENOVO_MT_20LB_BU_Think_FM_ThinkPadP52s: dmi.product.family: ThinkPad P52s dmi.product.name: 20LB001FUS dmi.product.sku: LENOVO_MT_20LB_BU_Think_FM_ThinkPad P52s dmi.product.version: ThinkPad P52s dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug impish package-from-proposed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948504 Title: [Lenovo P52s] Unable to WiFi connect to Inseego Wavemaker 5G FX2000 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1948504/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1843588] Re: Nautilus doesn't copy filenames for paste to other programs anymore
Hello Michael, or anyone else affected, Accepted nautilus into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/1:3.36.3-0ubuntu1.20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843588 Title: Nautilus doesn't copy filenames for paste to other programs anymore To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/1843588/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1939379] Re: ARM kernel builds fail with GCC 11
I've added php8.1 as a task because this bug is affecting the package as well. FWIW, I wasn't able to workaround this problem by just using -march=armv7-a+fp, even though I agree it should have worked. I had to actually pass -mfpu=vfpv3-d16 (no need to pass -march). Either way, I just wanted to let you folks know that this is affecting other packages too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939379 Title: ARM kernel builds fail with GCC 11 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-11/+bug/1939379/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1946096] Re: Support manual firmware upgrading for Foxconn and Quectel modems.
Is there a risk that applying these changes will regress the behavior of these modems on systems which have NOT applied the firmware updates? Can the testcase include a check for this? ** Changed in: modemmanager (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946096 Title: Support manual firmware upgrading for Foxconn and Quectel modems. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1946096/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1945590] Re: Thinkpad E14 Gen2: Kernel panic with trackpad and trackpoint enabled
I can also confirm that possibly the same bug occurs on my Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga (Intel i5-1135G7, Iris Xe), with kernel versions 5.13.0-20, 5.13.0-19 and 5.14.11 (mainline). Starting the system using 5.11.0-37 or the patched 5.13.0-15 from earlier does not lead to said kernel panic. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945590 Title: Thinkpad E14 Gen2: Kernel panic with trackpad and trackpoint enabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1945590/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948502] Status changed to Confirmed
This change was made by a bot. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948502 Title: TP-Link UB500 Bluetooth USB adapter not working properly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1948502/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948497] Re: [SRU] plasma-optimus has abnormally high power usage and has menu issues
Hello Erich, or anyone else affected, Accepted plasma-optimus into impish-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma- optimus/21.10.0-0ubuntu2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- impish to verification-done-impish. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-impish. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-impish -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948497 Title: [SRU] plasma-optimus has abnormally high power usage and has menu issues To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-optimus/+bug/1948497/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1786013] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-meta-kvm/5.4.0.1049.48)
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-meta-kvm (5.4.0.1049.48) for focal have finished running. The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package: rtl8812au/4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu13~20.04.3 (amd64) v4l2loopback/0.12.3-1ubuntu0.4 (amd64) oss4/4.2-build2010-5ubuntu6~20.04.3 (amd64) evdi/1.9.1-1ubuntu4~20.04.1 (amd64) sl-modem/2.9.11~20110321-16ubuntu1 (amd64) glibc/2.31-0ubuntu9.2 (amd64) dahdi-linux/1:2.11.1~dfsg-1ubuntu6.3 (amd64) virtualbox/6.1.26-dfsg-3~ubuntu1.20.04.2 (amd64) backport-iwlwifi-dkms/8324-0ubuntu3~20.04.4 (amd64) lttng-modules/2.12.5-1ubuntu2~20.04.1 (amd64) rtl8821ce/5.5.2.1-0ubuntu4~20.04.4 (amd64) Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1]. https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/focal/update_excuses.html#linux-meta-kvm [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786013 Title: Packaging resync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1919026] Re: cinnamon-settings-users: User dialog holds if user creates a user that already exists
is there any risk here that enumerating the users, in environments where a large number of users are visible to the system (AD realms, etc), will cause all user creation to be slow here? I would normally expect either to do a try and then catch whatever exception is raised when trying to create an already-existing user, or else to query for the exact username from the backend to find out whether it exists rather than enumerating. (Basically, one of the two options already listed in https://github.com/linuxmint/cinnamon/issues/9494#issue-667846043.) I see that this is already committed upstream, but I still have reservations about making a change such as this in SRU because of the risk that making a change that fixes behavior when the user has made an uncommon error (conflicting username) could impact all users in certain environments (AD realms) that haven't committed an error. ** Bug watch added: github.com/linuxmint/cinnamon/issues #9494 https://github.com/linuxmint/cinnamon/issues/9494 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1919026 Title: cinnamon-settings-users: User dialog holds if user creates a user that already exists To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cinnamon/+bug/1919026/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948502] Re: TP-Link UB500 Bluetooth USB adapter not working properly
** Attachment added: "dmesg.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1948502/+attachment/5535316/+files/dmesg.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948502 Title: TP-Link UB500 Bluetooth USB adapter not working properly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1948502/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948502] [NEW] TP-Link UB500 Bluetooth USB adapter not working properly
Public bug reported: I have just bought a Tp-link bluetooth 5.0 usb adapter (UB500). According to this website https://usb-ids.gowdy.us/read/UD/2357/0604 the chip is Realtek RTL8761B. It works just fine on Windows 10, but I'm having problems on Ubuntu. I'm running Ubuntu 21.10 with the 5.14.14-051414-generic kernel The adapter seems to be correctly installed and properly working, however scanning does not pick up any bluetooth device. I've tried two headsets (that I know are properly working) and my phone, with no success. When performing a scan on my phone, the computer doesn't show up, even if I've set it to visible. (I'm sorry if the information is not complete, but ubuntu-bug is not working for me) ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "lspci-vnvn.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948502/+attachment/5535315/+files/lspci-vnvn.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948502 Title: TP-Link UB500 Bluetooth USB adapter not working properly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1948502/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1939379] Re: ARM kernel builds fail with GCC 11
** Also affects: php8.1 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939379 Title: ARM kernel builds fail with GCC 11 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-11/+bug/1939379/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1786013] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-meta-kvm/5.11.0.1019.20)
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-meta-kvm (5.11.0.1019.20) for hirsute have finished running. The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package: rtl8821ce/5.5.2.1-0ubuntu6 (amd64) dahdi-linux/1:2.11.1~dfsg-1ubuntu8 (amd64) sl-modem/2.9.11~20110321-16ubuntu1 (amd64) v4l2loopback/0.12.5-1ubuntu1 (amd64) rtl8812au/4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu14 (amd64) lttng-modules/2.12.5-1ubuntu2~21.04.1 (amd64) backport-iwlwifi-dkms/8613-0ubuntu2 (amd64) oss4/4.2-build2010-5ubuntu8 (amd64) systemd/247.3-3ubuntu3.6 (amd64) Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1]. https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/hirsute/update_excuses.html#linux-meta-kvm [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786013 Title: Packaging resync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1947829] Re: Cannot identified WLAN card MT7921 in Ubunut OS with Install OS complete first OOBE Boot OS
Hello You-Sheng, or anyone else affected, Accepted linux-firmware into impish-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux- firmware/1.201.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- impish to verification-done-impish. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-impish. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu Impish) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947829 Title: Cannot identified WLAN card MT7921 in Ubunut OS with Install OS complete first OOBE Boot OS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/1947829/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1732482] Re: [snap] doesn't properly save desktop files for "create shortcuts" action
For Ubuntu users at least : in the Exec line of the .desktop just replace the beginning /snap/chromium//usr/lib/chromium-browser/chrome by chromium-browser Maybe also look at Web App Manager offered by Mint team. …and now Firefox will be packaged as a snap, what a sad joke. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1732482 Title: [snap] doesn't properly save desktop files for "create shortcuts" action To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1732482/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1941745] Re: [sru] sos upstream 4.2
Hello Eric, or anyone else affected, Accepted sosreport into impish-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/4.2-1ubuntu0.21.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- impish to verification-done-impish. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-impish. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu Impish) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-impish -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1941745 Title: [sru] sos upstream 4.2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/1941745/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1947783] Re: home page fails after upgrade to ubuntu 21.10
Phing fails with "PHP Fatal error: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is no longer supported in /usr/share/php/phing/Phing.php on line 1374" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947783 Title: home page fails after upgrade to ubuntu 21.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/phpldapadmin/+bug/1947783/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1945296] Re: To support goodix fp device [27C6:639C]
Two SRU bugs are listed in the changelog for this upload, with test cases referencing goodix devices. That accounts for two of the patches added in this upload. A total of 15 patches have been added in this upload, including a number of patches for devices from other vendors. How do you intend to verify these other changes? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945296 Title: To support goodix fp device [27C6:639C] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1945296/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1945052] Re: Caja extensions fills ~/.xsession-errors and Extensions listings are corrupt
Hello Norbert, or anyone else affected, Accepted python-caja into impish-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python- caja/1.26.0-0ubuntu2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- impish to verification-done-impish. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-impish. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: python-caja (Ubuntu Impish) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-impish -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945052 Title: Caja extensions fills ~/.xsession-errors and Extensions listings are corrupt To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup-caja/+bug/1945052/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1827958] Re: [Acer Swift 5 SF514-53T] No sound at all from the inbuilt microphone - since installation of system
I am using Acer Swift SF514-52T. This issue disappeared after I upgraded to Ubuntu 21.10. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1827958 Title: [Acer Swift 5 SF514-53T] No sound at all from the inbuilt microphone - since installation of system To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1827958/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1786013] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-meta-oracle/5.11.0.1021.22)
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-meta-oracle (5.11.0.1021.22) for hirsute have finished running. The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package: glibc/2.33-0ubuntu5 (amd64) Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1]. https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/hirsute/update_excuses.html#linux-meta-oracle [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786013 Title: Packaging resync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1786013] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-meta-azure/5.4.0.1063.61)
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-meta-azure (5.4.0.1063.61) for focal have finished running. The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package: lxc/1:4.0.6-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 (amd64) dahdi-linux/1:2.11.1~dfsg-1ubuntu6.3 (amd64) v4l2loopback/0.12.3-1ubuntu0.4 (amd64) backport-iwlwifi-dkms/8324-0ubuntu3~20.04.4 (amd64) Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1]. https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/focal/update_excuses.html#linux-meta-azure [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786013 Title: Packaging resync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948486] Re: Keyboard Brightness controll not operable using keyboard or mouse scrollwheel
Thank you for your bug report, the issue is an upstream one could you perhaps also report it on https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control- center/-/issues/ ? ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948486 Title: Keyboard Brightness controll not operable using keyboard or mouse scrollwheel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1948486/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948351] Re: ppc64 BPF JIT mod by 1 will not return 0
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+ When doing MOD by 1 with a immediate/constant divisor on PPC, the JIT will
produce code that returns the dividend, just like a division, instead of 0.
+
+ Both eBPF and cBPF will fail as well when doing such operations.
+
+ [Test case]
+ $ cat bpf-mod1.c
+ #include
+ #include
+ #include
+ #include
+ #include
+ #include
+ #include
+ #include
+ #include
+ #include
+ #include
+ #include
+
+ #define ARRAY_SIZE(array) (sizeof(array)/sizeof(array[0]))
+
+ static int pair[2];
+
+ static int attach()
+ {
+ int r;
+
+ struct sock_filter insn[] = {
+ { BPF_LD | BPF_W | BPF_ABS, 0, 0, 0 },
+ { BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD, 0, 0, 1 },
+ { BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0, 0, 0 },
+ };
+
+ struct sock_fprog prog = {};
+ prog.filter = insn;
+ prog.len = ARRAY_SIZE(insn);
+
+ socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_DGRAM, 0, pair);
+ setsockopt(pair[1], SOL_SOCKET, SO_ATTACH_FILTER, ,
sizeof(prog));
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ int main(int argc, char **argv)
+ {
+ int buf[5];
+ int r;
+ r = attach();
+ if (r < 0) {
+ err(1, "function will error out already");
+ }
+ write(pair[0], "hello", 5);
+ r = recv(pair[1], buf, 5, MSG_DONTWAIT);
+ if (r != -1 || errno != EAGAIN) {
+ err(1, "program failed");
+ }
+ return 0;
+ }
+ $ gcc -o bpf-mod1 bpf-mod1.c
+ $ ./bpf-mod1
+ cbpf-mod1: program failed: Success
+
+ After fix:
+ $ ./bpf-mod1
+ $ echo $?
+ 0
+
+ [Potential regression]
+ BPF programs might be misbehave on ppc64el.
+
+
+
This is a scripted bug report about ADT failures while running linux
tests for linux/5.4.0-90.101 on focal. Whether this is caused by the
dep8 tests of the tested source or the kernel has yet to be determined.
-
Consistently failing on Focal/linux 5.4.0-90.101
13:15:26 DEBUG| [stdout] # selftests: net: test_bpf.sh
13:15:27 DEBUG| [stdout] # test_bpf: [FAIL]
13:15:27 DEBUG| [stdout] not ok 9 selftests: net: test_bpf.sh # exit=1
-
Testing failed on:
ppc64el:
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal/focal/ppc64el/l/linux/20211021_141544_eda49@/log.gz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948351
Title:
ppc64 BPF JIT mod by 1 will not return 0
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1948351/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948481] Re: sustem locks up when trying to move icon (Firefox) up list on left update 2021-10
** Summary changed: - sustem locks up when tryiny to move icon (Firefox) up list on left update 2021-10 + sustem locks up when trying to move icon (Firefox) up list on left update 2021-10 ** Tags added: rpi -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948481 Title: sustem locks up when trying to move icon (Firefox) up list on left update 2021-10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1948481/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1786013] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-meta-azure-5.4/5.4.0.1063.43)
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-meta-azure-5.4 (5.4.0.1063.43) for bionic have finished running. The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package: v4l2loopback/0.10.0-1ubuntu1.2 (amd64) lxc/3.0.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 (amd64) kpatch/0.5.0-0ubuntu1.1 (amd64) dahdi-linux/1:2.11.1~dfsg-1ubuntu4.2 (amd64) asic0x/1.0.1-1 (amd64) Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1]. https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/bionic/update_excuses.html#linux-meta-azure-5.4 [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786013 Title: Packaging resync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948481] Re: sustem locks up when tryiny to move icon (Firefox) up list on left update 2021-10
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. It seems that your bug report is not filed about a specific source package though, rather it is just filed against Ubuntu in general. It is important that bug reports be filed about source packages so that people interested in the package can find the bugs about it. You can find some hints about determining what package your bug might be about at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage. You might also ask for help in the #ubuntu-bugs irc channel on Freenode. To change the source package that this bug is filed about visit https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1948481/+editstatus and add the package name in the text box next to the word Package. [This is an automated message. I apologize if it reached you inappropriately; please just reply to this message indicating so.] ** Tags added: bot-comment -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948481 Title: sustem locks up when tryiny to move icon (Firefox) up list on left update 2021-10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1948481/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1786013] Autopkgtest regression report (linux-meta-azure-5.11/5.11.0.1020.21~20.04.20)
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted linux-meta-azure-5.11 (5.11.0.1020.21~20.04.20) for focal have finished running. The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package: glibc/2.31-0ubuntu9.2 (amd64) Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1]. https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed- migration/focal/update_excuses.html#linux-meta-azure-5.11 [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786013 Title: Packaging resync To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1786013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948482] Re: Firefox is wrongly being transitioned from deb to snap on a fresh Budgie install
** Summary changed: - Firefox is wrongly being transitioned from deb to snap + Firefox is wrongly being transitioned from deb to snap on a fresh Budgie install -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948482 Title: Firefox is wrongly being transitioned from deb to snap on a fresh Budgie install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1948482/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948499] [NEW] 21.10 server install fails, no networks on Proliant (BCM57840 NetXtreme II)
Public bug reported:
I have a couple of HP BL460c blade servers. I can't get Ubuntu 21.10 installed
on them
(as well as other versions) because the network interfaces from the QLogic
BCM57840
devices don't show up.
During boot dmesg | grep bnx2x shows:
root@hp9b:~# dmesg | grep bnx2x
[6.719454] bnx2x :06:00.0: msix capability found
[6.812918] bnx2x :06:00.0: part number 0-0-0-0
[7.123370] bnx2x: probe of :06:00.0 failed with error -22
[<- That has me worried most]
[7.174829] bnx2x :06:00.1: msix capability found
[7.305138] bnx2x :06:00.1: part number 0-0-0-0
[7.539580] bnx2x: probe of :06:00.1 failed with error -22
root@hp9b:~# lspci | grep -i ethernet
06:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Inc. and subsidiaries BCM57840 NetXtreme
II 10/20-Gigabit Ethernet (rev 11)
06:00.1 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Inc. and subsidiaries BCM57840 NetXtreme
II 10/20-Gigabit Ethernet (rev 11)
The BIOS for the BL460c is already updated to the 2021.05 SPP and is at
v2.80. The networking device's firmware is also up to date at v7.18.77
(from the same 2021.05 SPP).
Does anyone know how to get one of these things working/detected
correctly? Other than somehow magically getting HP to start producing
non-buggy BIOS firmware. Is this a known bug/problem or is there a
kernel parameter I can specify during installation to get it working?
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-19.19-generic 5.13.14
Uname: Linux 5.13.0-19-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu70
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.465
CrashDB:
{
"impl": "launchpad",
"project": "subiquity",
"bug_pattern_url":
"http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/bugpatterns/bugpatterns.xml;
}
Date: Fri Oct 22 19:44:27 2021
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu-Server 21.10 "Impish Indri" - Release amd64 (20211013)
ProcEnviron:
TERM=linux
PATH=(custom, no user)
LANG=C.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
Snap: subiquity 21.10.3 ()
Symptom: installation
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
** Affects: ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: amd64 apport-bug impish uec-images
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948499
Title:
21.10 server install fails, no networks on Proliant (BCM57840
NetXtreme II)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1948499/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1947905] Re: mate-screensaver SegFault when it autostarts. Prevents system from sleeping or exiting sleep
This bug affects both AMD and Intel architecture. this bug is on AMD, the linked duplicate bug was on intel architecture. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947905 Title: mate-screensaver SegFault when it autostarts. Prevents system from sleeping or exiting sleep To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mate-screensaver/+bug/1947905/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948497] Re: [SRU] plasma-optimus has abnormally high power usage and has menu issues
** Also affects: plasma-optimus (Ubuntu Impish) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: plasma-optimus (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: High Assignee: Erich Eickmeyer (eeickmeyer) Status: Fix Committed ** Changed in: plasma-optimus (Ubuntu Impish) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: plasma-optimus (Ubuntu Impish) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: plasma-optimus (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: High => Medium ** Changed in: plasma-optimus (Ubuntu Impish) Assignee: (unassigned) => Erich Eickmeyer (eeickmeyer) ** Description changed: [Impact] * Users have reported abnormally high power usage in plasma-optimus. Upon investigation, this was due to a component (sniff-gpu.sh) being called every second, using 0.037 seconds of processor time each call due to glxinfo being called as part of the script. For laptop users, this is problematic when on battery power. This upload includes a patch which runs sniff-gpu.sh once upon load. Additionally, the script has been updated to only run "prime-select query" every 10 seconds as opposed to every second, which lowers CPU usage as well. * Additionally, it has been noticed that when someone changes GPU mode from the command line (via prime-select), this widget is unable to switch to the GPU mode previously selected since it was incorrectly reported as "true" when it should update to "false" for GPU mode in use. [Test Plan] * With plasma-optimus installed, run powertop. Notice every second sniff-gpu being called with high power usage due to glxinfo being called. * Change GPU mode via 'prime-select nvidia|on-demand|intel'. Widget will update to the correct icon, but more than one menu item becomes disabled (only current mode should be disabled). [Where problems could occur] * The only disadvantage to this update is that instead of updating the widget every second, it now updates every 10 seconds, meaning if one updates via 'prime-select' it will not take effect in the widget right away. This may cause some users, expecting it to update immediately/within a second, to think the behavior is abnormal. + + [Other Information] + + * This fix was done under an entirely new upload (22.04.0) for Jammy. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948497 Title: [SRU] plasma-optimus has abnormally high power usage and has menu issues To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-optimus/+bug/1948497/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948498] [NEW] Bluetooth Headset not working when Lenovo P14s AMD Gen1 is connected to Lenovo USB Dock 40AY0090EU
Public bug reported: When the Laptop is not connected to it's dock, the bluethooth headset works. As soon as it is connected to a Lenovo 40AY0090EU Dock, sound stops on the headsets and plays via the display connected via DisplayPort. The headset is still available in sound settings, but even if selected, no sound plays on the headset. If I change the configuration (HSP/A2DP), a short "click" sound can be heard on the headset, so apparently there's still something going on between the laptop and the headsets. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: pulseaudio 1:13.99.1-1ubuntu3.11 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-37.41~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22 Uname: Linux 5.11.0-37-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.20 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: skip CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Fri Oct 22 22:04:27 2021 InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-29 (23 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20210819) SourcePackage: pulseaudio UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 07/30/2021 dmi.bios.release: 1.35 dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO dmi.bios.version: R1BET66W(1.35 ) dmi.board.asset.tag: Not Available dmi.board.name: 20Y1000MGE dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO dmi.board.version: SDK0J40697 WIN dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO dmi.chassis.version: None dmi.ec.firmware.release: 1.35 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrR1BET66W(1.35):bd07/30/2021:br1.35:efr1.35:svnLENOVO:pn20Y1000MGE:pvrThinkPadP14sGen1:skuLENOVO_MT_20Y1_BU_Think_FM_ThinkPadP14sGen1:rvnLENOVO:rn20Y1000MGE:rvrSDK0J40697WIN:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNone: dmi.product.family: ThinkPad P14s Gen 1 dmi.product.name: 20Y1000MGE dmi.product.sku: LENOVO_MT_20Y1_BU_Think_FM_ThinkPad P14s Gen 1 dmi.product.version: ThinkPad P14s Gen 1 dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO ** Affects: pulseaudio (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948498 Title: Bluetooth Headset not working when Lenovo P14s AMD Gen1 is connected to Lenovo USB Dock 40AY0090EU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1948498/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1916250] Re: gir1.2-signon-2.0 needs to declare replace on older releases (Groovy2Hirsute and Focal2Jammy)
Given that hirsute and impish are both stable releases and focal2impish will be a supported upgrade path when hirsute becomes end of life there is need for an SRU. So could you please add the SRU template information to the bug report? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916250 Title: gir1.2-signon-2.0 needs to declare replace on older releases (Groovy2Hirsute and Focal2Jammy) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsignon-glib/+bug/1916250/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1945803] Re: a2jmidid: building on RISC-V fails
$ dput a2jmidid_9-2ubuntu1_source.changes Trying to upload package to ubuntu Checking signature on .changes gpg: /tmp/pkgs/impish/a2jmidid_9-2ubuntu1_source.changes: Valid signature from 1E918B66765B3E31 Checking signature on .dsc gpg: /tmp/pkgs/impish/a2jmidid_9-2ubuntu1.dsc: Valid signature from 1E918B66765B3E31 Uploading to ubuntu (via ftp to upload.ubuntu.com): Uploading a2jmidid_9-2ubuntu1.dsc: done. Uploading a2jmidid_9-2ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz: done. Uploading a2jmidid_9-2ubuntu1_source.buildinfo: done. Uploading a2jmidid_9-2ubuntu1_source.changes: done. Successfully uploaded packages. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945803 Title: a2jmidid: building on RISC-V fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/a2jmidid/+bug/1945803/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1945803] Re: a2jmidid: building on RISC-V fails
Well given that the Debian package hasn't been updated in two years let's just go ahead and get this done in Ubuntu. Heinrich please keep an eye on the upstream debian bug though and let us know if we can sync the package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945803 Title: a2jmidid: building on RISC-V fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/a2jmidid/+bug/1945803/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948497] [NEW] [SRU] plasma-optimus has abnormally high power usage and has menu issues
Public bug reported: [Impact] * Users have reported abnormally high power usage in plasma-optimus. Upon investigation, this was due to a component (sniff-gpu.sh) being called every second, using 0.037 seconds of processor time each call due to glxinfo being called as part of the script. For laptop users, this is problematic when on battery power. This upload includes a patch which runs sniff-gpu.sh once upon load. Additionally, the script has been updated to only run "prime-select query" every 10 seconds as opposed to every second, which lowers CPU usage as well. * Additionally, it has been noticed that when someone changes GPU mode from the command line (via prime-select), this widget is unable to switch to the GPU mode previously selected since it was incorrectly reported as "true" when it should update to "false" for GPU mode in use. [Test Plan] * With plasma-optimus installed, run powertop. Notice every second sniff-gpu being called with high power usage due to glxinfo being called. * Change GPU mode via 'prime-select nvidia|on-demand|intel'. Widget will update to the correct icon, but more than one menu item becomes disabled (only current mode should be disabled). [Where problems could occur] * The only disadvantage to this update is that instead of updating the widget every second, it now updates every 10 seconds, meaning if one updates via 'prime-select' it will not take effect in the widget right away. This may cause some users, expecting it to update immediately/within a second, to think the behavior is abnormal. ** Affects: plasma-optimus (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: Erich Eickmeyer (eeickmeyer) Status: Fix Committed ** Changed in: plasma-optimus (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: plasma-optimus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948497 Title: [SRU] plasma-optimus has abnormally high power usage and has menu issues To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-optimus/+bug/1948497/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1448668] Re: Grub menu hangs on down arrow press with USB keyboard on cold boot
It seems the problem can be averted by pressing ESC before doing anything else. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1448668 Title: Grub menu hangs on down arrow press with USB keyboard on cold boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1448668/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
