[Bug 390319] Re: Ubuntu does not automatically check for updates, even when set to
My original issue was unrelated to proxy settings. The machines in question were not behind a proxy. The problem here was related to /etc/cron.daily/apt not being marked executable after an upgrade --- as far as I know, no one has figured out why this happens, but it is easy enough to resolve manually. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390319 Title: Ubuntu does not automatically check for updates, even when set to To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-notifier/+bug/390319/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 293170] Re: [Intrepid] Having Firefox open for a while prevents new flash objects from being displayed
A 64-bit Flash plug-in is used now so nspluginwrapper is no longer necessary to view Flash content. However, other plug-ins using nspluginwrapper (i.e. Adobe Reader as I mentioned above) are still affected by this issue. Maybe that belongs in a separate bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293170 Title: [Intrepid] Having Firefox open for a while prevents new flash objects from being displayed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspluginwrapper/+bug/293170/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 905252] Re: CVE-2011-4130 in lucid, maverick, natty
Has there been any progress on getting this fix out? I'm asking because it *is* a security issue, and there hasn't been any reported progress for almost 3 months. This vulnerability is showing up in a PCI compliance scan for one of my servers running Lucid. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/905252 Title: CVE-2011-4130 in lucid, maverick, natty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/proftpd-dfsg/+bug/905252/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 861755] Re: Upgrade Eclipse to 3.7.1
Eclipse 3.7.1 is packaged for release with Ubuntu 12.04. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/861755 Title: Upgrade Eclipse to 3.7.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eclipse/+bug/861755/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 284596] Re: nm-applet fails when another user is logged in
This bug has recently been marked fixed upstream in Network Manager 0.9. Hopefully we'll get that packaged into the next version of Ubuntu. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456046 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284596 Title: nm-applet fails when another user is logged in -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 735665] [NEW] Impossible to disable middle-click paste without breaking the middle mouse button
Public bug reported: I've found plenty of forum posts from other people complaining about this but I couldn't find an existing but report in Launchpad. It baffles me to find that there is no way to disable the middle-click screen buffer paste feature without breaking the middle-click button on the mouse altogether. I'm sure there are lots of people who think it's nifty. However, for me and others, it is just annoying. If I am scrolling in a text editor like Gedit and the middle-click button actually gets pressed, it often pastes a chunk of text in the middle of the document and I don't notice because I scroll right by. This leads to trouble later on. My searching indicates that a common solution to this problem is to re- map the middle-click button to something else (so that it behaves like either the left or right button, or just does nothing), using xinput or by editing Xorg.conf. However, this breaks other applications that use the middle mouse button for other things (opening and closing tabs in Firefox, middle-click scroll). There should be a solution to this problem other than map the middle- click button to something else and get a new mouse that doesn't accidentally click. I don't care if it's setting an option in an obscure text file. To reproduce: - Open Gedit. - Type some text. - Select some text. - Middle-click somewhere in the document. - Selected text is copied to where you middle-clicked. - No (documented) way to disable this behavior without re-mapping the middle-mouse button, breaking other middle-click functionality. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: ubuntu-desktop 1.207 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-27.48-generic 2.6.35.11 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-27-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Mar 15 15:00:42 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: ubuntu-meta ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735665 Title: Impossible to disable middle-click paste without breaking the middle mouse button -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 735665] Re: Impossible to disable middle-click paste without breaking the middle mouse button
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735665 Title: Impossible to disable middle-click paste without breaking the middle mouse button -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 735665] Re: Impossible to disable middle-click paste without breaking the middle mouse button
** Package changed: ubuntu = xorg (Ubuntu) ** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #35340 http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35340 ** Also affects: xorg-server via http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35340 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735665 Title: Impossible to disable middle-click paste without breaking the middle mouse button -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 664514] Re: Unattended upgrade fails with segmentation fault in Ubuntu Server 10.10
Great, I read the description over there and it looks like it describes my problem exactly. I am running 32-bit Ubuntu. Furthermore, I noticed that the updated python-apt is already in the natty repository, so I installed natty's python-apt and python-apt- common and that promptly made my problem go away. Any way we could get this fix in Ubuntu 10.10? ** Package changed: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) = python-apt (Ubuntu) ** Also affects: python-apt via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596408 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Unattended upgrade fails with segmentation fault in Ubuntu Server 10.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/664514 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 664514] Re: Unattended upgrade fails with segmentation fault in Ubuntu Server 10.10
Log information from /var/log/unattended-upgrades. Whenever the
unattended-upgrade script is launched, these three lines are logged (and
no more):
2010-11-05 08:16:37,380 INFO Initial blacklisted packages:
2010-11-05 08:16:37,382 INFO Starting unattended upgrades script
2010-11-05 08:16:37,382 INFO Allowed origins are: [('Ubuntu', 'stable'),
('Ubuntu', 'maverick-security')]
This can be used to tell about how far the script got before it
crashed...
--
Unattended upgrade fails with segmentation fault in Ubuntu Server 10.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/664514
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 664514] Re: Unattended upgrade fails with segmentation fault in Ubuntu Server 10.10
** Description changed: After upgrading from Ubuntu Server 10.04 to Ubuntu Server 10.10, I noticed that security updates were no longer being applied automatically (contrary to my configuration). I did some poking around in the apt script (in etc/cron.daily). Here is the output with debug mode on. (I cleared out the time stamp files to - force it to update now so errors regarding those are not important. + force it to update now so errors regarding those are not important.) power status (255) undetermined, continuing system is on main power. sleeping for 739 seconds check_stamp: missing time stamp file: /var/lib/apt/periodic/update-stamp. apt-key net-update (success) download updated metadata (success). send dbus signal (success) X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication. check_stamp: missing time stamp file: /var/lib/apt/periodic/download-upgradeable-stamp. download upgradable (success) check_stamp: missing time stamp file: /var/lib/apt/periodic/upgrade-stamp. Segmentation fault unattended-upgrade (error) check_stamp: missing time stamp file: /var/lib/apt/periodic/autoclean-stamp. autoclean (success). aged: ctime 30 and mtime 30 and ctime2 and mtime2 end remove by archive size: size=412396 512000 So, what's that seg fault in the middle there? Turns out it is the call to /usr/bin/unattended-upgrade. I can actually reproduce it like this: $ sudo unattended-upgrade Segmentation fault Now, this is about all I know how to do to debug the issue. If you'd like me to run a stack trace or something on unattended-upgrade to figure out why it is crashing, please point me towards some directions to do so. (I notice that it is a python script and I am not very familiar with python.) In any case, this is a security issue, since security updates cannot be installed automatically, I have to remember to check the server often to make sure that security updates are applied. -- Unattended upgrade fails with segmentation fault in Ubuntu Server 10.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/664514 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 664514] [NEW] Unattended upgrade fails with segmentation fault in Ubuntu Server 10.10
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: After upgrading from Ubuntu Server 10.04 to Ubuntu Server 10.10, I noticed that security updates were no longer being applied automatically (contrary to my configuration). I did some poking around in the apt script (in etc/cron.daily). Here is the output with debug mode on. (I cleared out the time stamp files to force it to update now so errors regarding those are not important. power status (255) undetermined, continuing system is on main power. sleeping for 739 seconds check_stamp: missing time stamp file: /var/lib/apt/periodic/update-stamp. apt-key net-update (success) download updated metadata (success). send dbus signal (success) X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication. check_stamp: missing time stamp file: /var/lib/apt/periodic/download-upgradeable-stamp. download upgradable (success) check_stamp: missing time stamp file: /var/lib/apt/periodic/upgrade-stamp. Segmentation fault unattended-upgrade (error) check_stamp: missing time stamp file: /var/lib/apt/periodic/autoclean-stamp. autoclean (success). aged: ctime 30 and mtime 30 and ctime2 and mtime2 end remove by archive size: size=412396 512000 So, what's that seg fault in the middle there? Turns out it is the call to /usr/bin/unattended-upgrade. I can actually reproduce it like this: $ sudo unattended-upgrade Segmentation fault Now, this is about all I know how to do to debug the issue. If you'd like me to run a stack trace or something on unattended-upgrade to figure out why it is crashing, please point me towards some directions to do so. (I notice that it is a python script and I am not very familiar with python.) In any case, this is a security issue, since security updates cannot be installed automatically, I have to remember to check the server often to make sure that security updates are applied. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Visibility changed to: Public ** Description changed: After upgrading from Ubuntu Server 10.04 to Ubuntu Server 10.10, I noticed that security updates were no longer being applied automatically (contrary to my configuration). I did some poking around in the apt script (in etc/cron.daily). Here is the output with debug mode on. (I cleared out the time stamp files to force it to update now so errors regarding those are not important. power status (255) undetermined, continuing system is on main power. sleeping for 739 seconds check_stamp: missing time stamp file: /var/lib/apt/periodic/update-stamp. apt-key net-update (success) download updated metadata (success). send dbus signal (success) X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication. check_stamp: missing time stamp file: /var/lib/apt/periodic/download-upgradeable-stamp. download upgradable (success) check_stamp: missing time stamp file: /var/lib/apt/periodic/upgrade-stamp. Segmentation fault unattended-upgrade (error) check_stamp: missing time stamp file: /var/lib/apt/periodic/autoclean-stamp. autoclean (success). aged: ctime 30 and mtime 30 and ctime2 and mtime2 end remove by archive size: size=412396 512000 So, what's that seg fault in the middle there? Turns out it is the call to /usr/bin/unattended-upgrade. I can actually reproduce it like this: - # sudo unattended-upgrade + $ sudo unattended-upgrade Segmentation fault Now, this is about all I know how to do to debug the issue. If you'd like me to run a stack trace or something on unattended-upgrade to figure out why it is crashing, please point me towards some directions to do so. (I notice that it is a python script and I am not very familiar with python.) In any case, this is a security issue, since security updates cannot be installed automatically, I have to remember to check the server often to make sure that security updates are applied. -- Unattended upgrade fails with segmentation fault in Ubuntu Server 10.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/664514 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355112] Re: Ask.com keeps being re-added to Firefox search bar after updates
Confirmed fixed here as well. I made sure to check it carefully during my upgrade to 3.6.9 after reading these comments. -- Ask.com keeps being re-added to Firefox search bar after updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355112 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 614483] Re: Deprecated: Function ereg() is deprecated in /usr/share/cacti/site/install/index.php on line 45
Same here. I tried turning off deprecated errors in php.ini but it is still there. Turning off Display errors in php.ini made the errors go away. I like to have those on for development, though. -- Deprecated: Function ereg() is deprecated in /usr/share/cacti/site/install/index.php on line 45 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614483 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355112] Re: Ask.com keeps being re-added to Firefox search bar after updates
I don't think this is really a Mozilla issue. As per comment #23, this happens because the path to the Ask.com search plug-in changes each time Firefox is updated, so Firefox thinks that it is a new search plug-in that has been installed. This is a side effect of how the Ask.com search plug-in is included with the package. The fix to this issue is simple: if the Ask.com search plug-in must be included by default, it should be put in /usr/lib/firefox-addons/searchplugins with all the rest of the default plug-ins. -- Ask.com keeps being re-added to Firefox search bar after updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355112 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355112] Re: Ask.com keeps being re-added to Firefox search bar after updates
Yeah. Of course, this change would have to be made by the packagers. If you just move the file yourself, it'll just get replaced at the next update. -- Ask.com keeps being re-added to Firefox search bar after updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355112 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 409621] Re: The program 'gnome-settings-daemon' received an X Window System error. During on a FreeNX server suring a session.
I see those errors all the time when starting applications in an NX session. For instance, starting gedit from the terminal gives errors like that. I don't think it's related to this bug, because it's been happening as long as I can remember. -- The program 'gnome-settings-daemon' received an X Window System error. During on a FreeNX server suring a session. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409621 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355112] Re: Ask.com keeps being re-added to Firefox search bar after updates
Doesn't seem to be quite the same problem. The Ask.com search engine is included by default in Ubuntu, not by an extra theme. I don't have any extra themes installed to be updated and I still experience this issue. -- Ask.com keeps being re-added to Firefox search bar after updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355112 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 390319] Re: Ubuntu does not automatically check for updates, even when set to
Here you are... dist-upgrade logs from two affected machines. ** Attachment added: dist-upgrade logs from two affected machines http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29022810/dist-upgrade.tar.bz2 -- Ubuntu does not automatically check for updates, even when set to https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390319 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 390319] Re: Ubuntu does not automatically check for updates, even when set to
Found the problem (I think). The /etc/cron.daily/apt script, which I believe handles the automatic update setting, was not marked executable on either machine. This reveals two problems: - /etc/cron.daily/apt lost its executable status during the do-release-upgrade process (I'm quite sure I didn't change the permissions on that file myself) - The GUI for configuring the automatic update interval should check this and warn you if this script is not executable! (Or just fix it itself.) -- Ubuntu does not automatically check for updates, even when set to https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390319 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355112] Re: Ask.com keeps being re-added to Firefox search bar after updates
Why is the Ask.com search plug-in packaged differently than the Ubuntu Package Search search plug-in? The Ubuntu Package Search plug-in does not return upon every Firefox update if it is removed. I don't know which way is more proper to bundle search plug-ins with Ubuntu, but it makes sense to choose one way and use it for all of the extra search plug-ins that are included. On another note, why is the Ask.com plug-in included at all? Do lots of people use this? Maybe there's a good reason for it that I'm missing. Seems to me, though, that if a user wants to be able to search Ask.com from the Firefox search bar, they can add it from the long list of search plug-ins available for Firefox that you can access through the Manage search engines dialog. -- Ask.com keeps being re-added to Firefox search bar after updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355112 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 390319] [NEW] Ubuntu does not automatically check for updates, even when set to
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-notifier I have two machines with this problem. This shouldn't be happening, so I am calling it a bug. One of them is running the desktop version of Ubuntu 9.04. I have set it in the Software Sources admin applet to Check for updates daily and Download all updates in the background. It never offers updates to me. But if I go to the terminal and sudo aptitude update, updates are offered via the GUI right away. So, it seems that whatever process in the background is supposed to check for updates periodically is not working. Another machine running the server version of Ubuntu 9.04. I have it set to check daily install security updates automatically. It also never finds updates automatically --- if I connect via SSH it tells me 0 updated packages are available, and security updates are never installed automatically. I have to make sure to connect and install updates manually from time to time. Please let me know what I can do to help track this problem down. Disclaimers: Both of these machines were upgraded from Ubuntu 8.10. Both of them properly checked for updates before the upgrade to 9.04, and have been displaying this problem since the very moment 9.04 was released. I am aware of the new update notification system in 9.04 (security updates daily, other updates weekly, no tray icon, etc.). This is not the problem here. I left town for two weeks and left both machines on to check, neither of them offered any updates automatically, but as soon as I returned and did a sudo aptitude update there were 60+ updates available on the desktop machine, many of them security updates that should have been detected by the daily check. I'm not sure if the method used to upgrade from 8.10 would make any difference, but it is the only thing I can think of that is different between my machines. What I mean is, these two machines that do not check for updates automatically were updated from 8.10 with the command- line method (do-release-upgrade). I have a third machine upgraded with the GUI method and it is handling automatic update checking beautifully. Thank you! ** Affects: update-notifier (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Ubuntu does not automatically check for updates, even when set to https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390319 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 385948] [NEW] Invest stock data does not refresh automatically
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-applets Running the Invest GNOME-applet (2.26.1) on Ubuntu 9.04. The stock data does not refresh automatically, I have to right-click on the applet and select refresh. There doesn't seem to be any options for controlling a refresh interval. Stock data should periodically refresh automatically. ** Affects: gnome-applets Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Affects: gnome-applets (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #566923 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=566923 ** Also affects: gnome-applets via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=566923 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Invest stock data does not refresh automatically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/385948 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 304179] Re: [Dell laptops] BCM2045B2 bluetooth adapter causes Ubuntu to fail to suspend/hibernate
Seems to be fixed in 9.04. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- [Dell laptops] BCM2045B2 bluetooth adapter causes Ubuntu to fail to suspend/hibernate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/304179 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 202389] Re: Missing Java Web Start on amd64
Marking as fixed. Java Web Start is provided in the sun-java6-plugin package in Ubuntu 9.04 on amd64, and works out-of-the-box for launching Java web applications from Firefox or GNOME. ** Changed in: sun-java6 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- Missing Java Web Start on amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202389 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 202389] Re: Missing Java Web Start on amd64
Fix released by Sun with Java 1.6 Update 12. ** Changed in: sun-java Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- Missing Java Web Start on amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202389 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 334344] Re: wishlist: integrate libnotify in Thunderbird notifications
I think it works with both Firefox and Thunderbird, the idea being you can install it in Firefox to get Download complete and such notifications. Change the URL to Thunderbird (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/11530/) and you'll see that it is added for Thunderbird as well. You have to save the .xpi file and manually install it, though. Anyways, my complaint is that, with Thunderbird, it likes to notify when new junk mail arrives. This doesn't happen with Thunderbird's regular notifier. -- wishlist: integrate libnotify in Thunderbird notifications https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/334344 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 299159] Re: [firefox-3.0] crash when master password prompt displayed
Haven't had this crash in 3.0.8 or 3.0.9 since I upgraded to Jaunty, and I've given it several opportunities to show itself. I'm going to call it fixed. ** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- [firefox-3.0] crash when master password prompt displayed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301189] Re: Vuze's updater will not upgrade to 4.0.0.4
Once again, Vuze's built-in updater is not expected to work if you are using the version installed by the package manager. This copy of Vuze should only be updated by the package manager. If you want Vuze's built-in updater to work, just download it from their web site and run it from somewhere in your home directory. That being said, I'm also disappointed that the version in the repositories is so old. However, it looks like Ubuntu just gets Vuze from Debian's repositories, and they have a really old copy too. Might be worth filing a bug over there, or looking into what it would take to get the new version packaged and distributed in Ubuntu. -- Vuze's updater will not upgrade to 4.0.0.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301189 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348109] Re: Vuze/Azureus openjdk hardcoded to executeable
Same problem here. I have sun-java6-jre installed, and after upgrading to 9.04, Azureus will not launch. Worked great in 8.10. (Changing the launch script to point to the correct Java executable works great, but this is a completely silly problem. Shouldn't hard-code the path to the Java executable when there is more than one JVM that will work...) -- Vuze/Azureus openjdk hardcoded to executeable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348109 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 202389] Re: Missing Java Web Start on amd64
Java Web Start is included in the packaged version of Sun's JRE 1.6.13, which is in the Jaunty repositories. However, it is NOT installed somewhere in the default path --- i.e., typing 'javaws' in a terminal window gives you: The program 'javaws' is currently not installed. You can install it by typing: sudo apt-get install openjdk-6-jre However, you can still invoke it with /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun/jre/bin/javaws. This is a little silly, you shouldn't get this message if javaws is actually installed. So, I think this bug should not be marked fixed. -- Missing Java Web Start on amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202389 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 352078] Re: Ask.com search engine reappears after every Firefox update
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24553730/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ExtensionSummary.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24553731/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: profiles.ini.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24553732/profiles.ini.txt -- Ask.com search engine reappears after every Firefox update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352078 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 352078] [NEW] Ask.com search engine reappears after every Firefox update
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 Using Ubuntu 8.10, Firefox 3.0.x. Every time an update for Firefox comes down through Ubuntu's update manager, and I install it, I notice that the Ask.com engine has been added back to the list of search engines you can select to use with the search bar. If I remove it, it stays gone until the next Firefox update, and then it comes back. This isn't the case for all search engines that come installed by default. For instance, I tried with the Ubuntu package search engine that comes installed by default, and it stays gone when you update. To reproduce: - Using a non-current version of Firefox, remove the Ask.com search engine through the Manage search engines... dialog box. - Update to the current version of Firefox using the update manager or apt-get. - Ask.com is back... Expected results: If you remove a search engine from the list, it should stay gone! Search engines shouldn't be added unless a new version of Firefox comes with an engine defined that was not in the previous version. (Note: This is the behavior on Windows or OS X. If you remove an update, it's gone even after updates, whether you update Firefox manually or automatically.) ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: firefox-3.0 3.0.8+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.10.2 ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: firefox-3.0 Uname: Linux 2.6.27-11-generic x86_64 ** Affects: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug -- Ask.com search engine reappears after every Firefox update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352078 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 328660] Re: [OpenOffice] Poor performance after resume from hibernate
Yes, the issue is still present with OpenGL and hardware acceleration turned off. -- [OpenOffice] Poor performance after resume from hibernate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328660 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297965] Re: ath9k performances are unacceptable
It's been noted by the people who wrote this driver that 1 Mbps will always be reported as the connection speed... it is not necessarily accurate. The driver does not properly report the connection speed. You'll have to actually do some transfers and watch the speed to get a measure of how fast your link is. -- ath9k performances are unacceptable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297965 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 328660] Re: [OpenOffice] Poor performance after resume from hibernate
I've confirmed that this happens in OOo Spreadsheet as well as Writer. Let me know if I can do anything to help determine what exactly is causing this. -- [OpenOffice] Poor performance after resume from hibernate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328660 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301189] Re: Vuze's updater will not upgrade to 4.0.0.4
I'll respond to a couple points... If Azureus simply provided a .deb at their website and you added that manually to the package manger, would that also fail to update I wonder. Yes, it would fail to update, for the same reason. The update failure is because Azureus/Vuze is installed in a location that users are not allowed to write to. (I am not aware of any .deb, from the Ubuntu repositories or not, that installs an application in a location or with permissions that a user would be allowed to modify it. But, maybe such a thing does exist.) The ways that occur to me to fix this are... - As I've mentioned before, install Azureus/Vuze yourself in your home directory. Then automatic updates will work fine. - Azureus/Vuze is made to be more Linux[/Ubuntu] aware and prompts for credentials to run with elevated privileges so that it can update itself. - You go manually set permissions to be more relaxed, so that Azureus/Vuze can update itself without elevated privileges. Those second two I think are bad ideas, again, if you're using the packaged version of an application, it shouldn't be updated by anything besides the package manager, so that the package manager is aware of the changes (and can possibly handle changed dependencies). Plus, I'm not even sure if they'd even work, the packaged version may be installed in a different manner than Vuze's updater expects. (I'm not aware of the fine details here.) Side note - if the Azureus folks were to provide a .deb file, it wouldn't be a big leap from there to provide a Debian repository (and just update it as new versions of Azureus are released), which you could add to your list of repositories and solve this problem. However, I don't know of any plans of them to offer this, I don't see it happening in the near future, it's something you'd have to take up with them. :-) This is not really just a problem with Vuze, but with any application with a built-in updater. If you used a packaged version, you are relying on the repository maintainers and package manager to keep you up to date. If you'd like to keep yourself up to date or let the application to it itself, you've got to install the application yourself... -- Vuze's updater will not upgrade to 4.0.0.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301189 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301189] Re: Vuze's updater will not upgrade to 4.0.0.4
I don't think that the built in updater should be completely disabled in the packaged version of Vuze. It simply should not check for updates to Azureus/Vuze by default -- since that is the package manager's job (and also, updates Vuze attempts to apply to itself will fail, which is the reason for this problem). Of course, the built-in update manager is useful for updating things like plug-ins that were installed through their built-in plug-in management system. I suggested installing Azureus in your home directory without using the package manager not because that is the best solution, but that is what you have to do if you want to use the most current version, as Vuze in the repositories is not updated very often (4.x is not even in the jaunty repos at the moment), and also, the built-in update manager will actually work. Using Vuze's auto updater with the packaged version is not a good idea. The package manager will not be aware of updates to Vuze in this case, extra files may be added with new versions that the package manager is not aware of, dependencies may change, etc. When using the packaged version, updates should come through the package manager. The most ideal solutions to this situation are: - Vuze is updated more frequently in the repositories. - The Vuze folks run their own Debian repository that you can add to sources.list to receive updates through the package manager. This way, new versions can be made available immediately to users of the packaged version, without relying on Ubuntu repository managers to get the update packaged and available right away. (There are already a number of application writers that make their applications available through their own repositories, so that updates can be retrieved automatically by the package manager: VirtualBox, Opera, Google Desktop/Picasa, MKVToolNix, Ubuntu Tweak, ). -- Vuze's updater will not upgrade to 4.0.0.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301189 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 328660] [NEW] [OpenOffice] Poor performance after resume from hibernate
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org Brief system summary: Intel Core 2 Duo, 2.40 GHz 4 GB RAM NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT Ubuntu 8.10, 64-bit After resuming from hibernate, if OpenOffice.org Writer is open (and was open before the hibernate), scrolling in OOo Writer becomes very slow. Using the scroll wheel means waiting about 1 second per click (rather than virtually instantaneous scrolling), and dragging the scrollbar around causes OOo Writer to hang for several seconds until it finally redraws the screen. While the slow scroll business is going on, I see that Xorg is using 100% of a CPU core. Closing OOo Writer and opening it back up resolves the issue. No other applications [that I have found] seem to exhibit this behavior. I've reproduced his issue with OpenOffice.org 2.4.1 (most up-to-date Ubuntu package) and 3.0.1 (from PPA). Also, I've reproduced it with both nvidia-glx-177 and nvidia-glx-180. Quick repro steps: - Open OOo Writer and a document that is more than one or two pages long (to make sure there is good room for scrolling). - Notice that scrolling with the scroll bars or mouse wheel is working fine. - Hibernate the machine. - Turn the machine back on. - Now, OOo is scrolling very slowly and Xorg uses high CPU when you try to scroll OOo. Let me know if I can provide any additional information. ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: Binary package hint: openoffice.org Brief system summary: Intel Core 2 Duo, 2.40 GHz 4 GB RAM NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT Ubuntu 8.10, 64-bit - After resuming from hibernate, if OpenOffice.org is open (and was open - before the hibernate), scrolling in OOo Writer becomes very slow. Using - the scroll wheel means waiting about 1 second per click (rather than - virtually instantaneous scrolling), and dragging the scrollbar around - causes OOo Writer to hang for several seconds until it finally redraws - the screen. + After resuming from hibernate, if OpenOffice.org Writer is open (and was + open before the hibernate), scrolling in OOo Writer becomes very slow. + Using the scroll wheel means waiting about 1 second per click (rather + than virtually instantaneous scrolling), and dragging the scrollbar + around causes OOo Writer to hang for several seconds until it finally + redraws the screen. While the slow scroll business is going on, I see that Xorg is using 100% of a CPU core. Closing OOo Writer and opening it back up resolves the issue. No other applications [that I have found] seem to exhibit this behavior. I've reproduced his issue with OpenOffice.org 2.4.1 (most up-to-date Ubuntu package) and 3.0.1 (from PPA). Also, I've reproduced it with both nvidia-glx-177 and nvidia-glx-180. Quick repro steps: - Open OOo Writer and a document that is more than one or two pages long (to make sure there is good room for scrolling). - Notice that scrolling with the scroll bars or mouse wheel is working fine. - Hibernate the machine. - Turn the machine back on. - Now, OOo is scrolling very slowly and Xorg uses high CPU when you try to scroll OOo. Let me know if I can provide any additional information. -- [OpenOffice] Poor performance after resume from hibernate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328660 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 319378] Re: [ath9k] Kernel panic in 2.6.27-11
I still haven't been able to catch a stack trace. (I'm assuming one will pop up on the screen if I happen to be in a tty when the crash occurs, but since it is so infrequent, and I haven't been able to reproduce it on purpose...) -- [ath9k] Kernel panic in 2.6.27-11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/319378 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 301189] Re: Vuze's updater will not upgrade to 4.0.0.4
It can't update itself because, if Vuze is installed by the Ubuntu package manager, it is installed system-wide and as a regular user, you do not have permission to modify the executable. If Vuze tries to update itself, it will not have permission, and fail. You may be able to force it somehow, but that's not a good idea, because then the version of Vuze that you have installed will be out of sync with the version that the Ubuntu package manager thinks you have. Choices are: - Download Vuze from their web site, drop it somewhere in your home directory, and run it from there. It should be able to update itself fine. - Disable Vuze's automatic updates and rely on Ubuntu's update manager. Updates will be fewer and far between, but you get a nice pre-packaged app that gets installed for all users. To solve this bug, I think that Vuze's built-in updater should be disabled (if you are using the version installed via Ubuntu's package manager), like it is with Firefox and some other apps. (However, Vuze should still be able to automatically check for updates to plug-ins that you have installed, because that works fine.) -- Vuze's updater will not upgrade to 4.0.0.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301189 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 202389] Re: Missing Java Web Start on amd64
Should now be packaged for release in Jaunty. See the changelog for sun-java6-plugin here: http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/multiverse/s/sun-java6/sun-java6_6-12-0ubuntu1/changelog -- Missing Java Web Start on amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202389 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 202389] Re: Missing Java Web Start on amd64
Now available under the DLJ. The info is here: https://jdk- distros.dev.java.net/developer.html Some people have reported getting the 64-bit browser plug-in to work in Ubuntu in comments on the original bug report at bugs.sun.com. So, you may be able to download the release from Sun and get it working right now. Otherwise, hopefully we will see the new 64-bit stuff packaged for jaunty. -- Missing Java Web Start on amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202389 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 286932] Re: openoffice and skype menus and buttons disappear and reappear hovering over with mouse
Quick fix, now that new NVIDIA drivers are in the Ubuntu repositories. sudo apt-get install nvidia-glx-180 It should uninstall the NVIDIA 177 driver and install the 180 version. Then reboot your machine and you should be using the new 180 version of the driver... And OpenOffice menus and buttons work fine. -- openoffice and skype menus and buttons disappear and reappear hovering over with mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286932 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 319378] Re: [ath9k] Kernel panic in 2.6.27-11
Happened again today. linux-crashdump did not seem to do its job. I will try to repro from a tty so I can see if there is any useful output there. -- [ath9k] Kernel panic in 2.6.27-11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/319378 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 319378] [NEW] [ath9k] Kernel panic in 2.6.27-11
Public bug reported: Hello, folks. I have an Atheros wireless card with the AR5008 chipset (same as used in some MacBook Pros). Performance in Ubuntu 8.10 has generally been poor. However, there are already other bug reports about that. One of these bug reports is #297965 (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/297965), where John Pugh said that he could not reproduce the performance problem in the latest kernel for intrepid. Still having the performance problem in 2.6.27-9, I decided to grab the latest kernel update and related packages from intrepid-proposed (2.6.27-11) and see if anything would improve. Performance was better in the new version of the kernel, but after using the wireless for a while, my machine crashed with kernel panic. That is the subject of this bug report. I suspect the ath9k module for a couple of reasons. - First of all, I had been using the machine on 2.6.27-11 for several days, but I usually don't use the wireless, but it crashed after maybe two hours of wireless use. - Also, I've tried the compat-wireless modules before (http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download) with the same results: better performance, but frequent kernel panic. I'd like to hear if anyone else has tried 2.6.27-11 who has an AR5008-based wireless card. I'm still a relative newcomer to Linux, so if there is more information that you would like me to provide, either tell me what to do or point me towards some directions. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [ath9k] Kernel panic in 2.6.27-11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/319378 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297965] Re: ath9k performances are unacceptable
Bug filed: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/319378 -- ath9k performances are unacceptable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297965 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 319378] Re: [ath9k] Kernel panic in 2.6.27-11
I just discovered and set up linux-crashdump, so hopefully next time it panics, I'll be able to capture some useful information. -- [ath9k] Kernel panic in 2.6.27-11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/319378 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297965] Re: ath9k performances are unacceptable
My machine just crashed (KERNEL PANIC) while running 2.6.27-11, after using the wireless for a few hours. This is the firs time that I have used the wireless for an extended period of time since installing 2.6.27-11. I'm back on 2.6.27-9 for now. I believe this was caused by the updated ath9k module. This is the same kind of behavior I found when trying to use an updated ath9k kernel module from compat-wireless (http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download). Performance is much better but the driver is unstable, I got kernel panic while using the compat-wireless module as well. -- ath9k performances are unacceptable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297965 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297965] Re: ath9k performances are unacceptable
I grabbed and installed the new(ish?) version of the kernel, 2.6.27-11, from intrepid-proposed (along with the related packages). This seems to have improved the situation for me. (Previously, using ath9k, I got terrible performance on a 802.11n network but now I am able to achieve transfers over 1 MB/sec on the LAN.) I will continue testing to see if there are any problems, but even if it is not fixed, it seems for the moment to be improved enough to be usable. Have you tried with 2.6.27-11? -- ath9k performances are unacceptable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297965 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 299146] Re: flashplugin-nonfree on amd64 should use pure 64 bit plugin
To clarify, this release Jaunty only? I noticed that the Intrepid package has the same version number but it still depends on nspluginwrapper. -- flashplugin-nonfree on amd64 should use pure 64 bit plugin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299146 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297008] Re: Apple USB Ethernet Adapter -- does not work after suspend/resume
Note: This can be fixed easily by unloading the asix kernel module prior to suspend and loading it back afterwards. I hope to see this automated in Ubuntu. -- Apple USB Ethernet Adapter -- does not work after suspend/resume https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297008 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 304179] [NEW] BCM2045B2 bluetooth adapter causes Ubuntu to fail to suspend/hibernate
Public bug reported: I am using a Dell Inspiron 1720 notebook with Ubuntu 8.10 x86_64. I have been having intermittent hibernate failures (I'd say about 1 in 4 attempts fail) and I tracked it down to the bluetooth adapter not suspending properly. The bluetooth adapter is a Broadcom BCM2045B2. Here's a snippet from the syslog around a failed hibernate: 1: Dec 1 16:09:27 KEI kernel: [20750.925927] PM: Shrinking memory... ^H-^H\^H|^H/^H-^H\^H|^H/^H-^H\^H|^H/^H-^Hdone (139516 pages freed) 2: Dec 1 16:09:27 KEI kernel: [20769.390182] PM: Freed 558064 kbytes in 18.46 seconds (30.23 MB/s) 3: Dec 1 16:09:27 KEI kernel: [20769.390185] Suspending console(s) (use no_console_suspend to debug) 4: Dec 1 16:09:27 KEI kernel: [20769.390839] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Synchronizing SCSI cache 5: Dec 1 16:09:27 KEI kernel: [20769.592046] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Synchronizing SCSI cache 6: Dec 1 16:09:27 KEI kernel: [20769.611299] hub 1-2:1.0: suspend error -16 7: Dec 1 16:09:27 KEI bluetoothd[6159]: HCI dev 0 unregistered 8: Dec 1 16:09:28 KEI bluetoothd[6159]: Unregister path: /org/bluez/hci0 9: Dec 1 16:09:28 KEI kernel: [20769.611301] pm_op(): usb_dev_freeze+0x0/0x20 [usbcore] returns -16 10: Dec 1 16:09:28 KEI bluetoothd[6159]: HCI dev 0 registered 11: Dec 1 16:09:28 KEI kernel: [20769.611343] PM: Device 1-2 failed to freeze: error -16 12: Dec 1 16:09:28 KEI kernel: [20769.611469] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Starting disk 13: Dec 1 16:09:28 KEI kernel: [20769.639201] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Starting disk 14: Dec 1 16:09:28 KEI kernel: [20769.656719] pm_op(): usb_dev_restore+0x0/0x10 [usbcore] returns -19 15: Dec 1 16:09:28 KEI kernel: [20769.656744] PM: Device 1-2.1 failed to restore: error -19 16: Dec 1 16:09:28 KEI kernel: [20769.656752] pm_op(): usb_dev_restore+0x0/0x10 [usbcore] returns -19 17: Dec 1 16:09:28 KEI kernel: [20769.656773] PM: Device 1-2.2 failed to restore: error -19 18: Dec 1 16:09:28 KEI kernel: [20769.656777] pm_op(): usb_dev_restore+0x0/0x10 [usbcore] returns -19 19: Dec 1 16:09:28 KEI kernel: [20769.656797] PM: Device 1-2.3 failed to restore: error -19 20: Dec 1 16:09:28 KEI kernel: [20769.725487] PM: Image restored successfully. Notice the failure notifications on lines 6, 9, and 11. Device 1-2 the bluetooth adapter. When the hibernation fails, I am plopped back at a screen asking for my password to unlock my desktop session. It is as if the hibernate was successful and the machine had been turned back on (however, the machine never actually turned off). Let me know if I can provide any additional information. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- BCM2045B2 bluetooth adapter causes Ubuntu to fail to suspend/hibernate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/304179 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 293170] Re: [Intrepid] Having Firefox open for a while prevents new flash objects from being displayed
I have this issue too. I am pretty sure the issue is with nspluginwrapper, and here's why: I installed Adobe Reader 8 via the Medibuntu repositories, along with the Adobe Reader PDF plug-in which also uses nspluginwrapper to work on 64-bit systems. This plug-in also doesn't work after a while. If you'd like, you could check to see if you have the same behavior as me: - Add Medibuntu repositories. (See: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Medibuntu) - Open Synaptic package manager, and install... acroread-dictionary-en and acroread-l10n-en (If you do not choose the language packages first, it will default to German when you select acroread) acroread mozilla-acroread - Open Acrobat Reader, go to Edit - Preferences - Internet and uncheck Enable fast web view. (This isn't really necessary but it prevents an annoying situation where acroread is stuck using 100% CPU.) - Find a PDF online in Firefox and verify that it is displayed using the Adobe Reader plug-in. - Next time you find Flash not working, check and see if Adobe Reader is also not working. (See if you can find a case where one works and the other doesn't.) After you're done, you can remove Adobe Reader, since it's not really useful for anything other than viewing PDFs in the browser (and since that doesn't work reliably...). -- [Intrepid] Having Firefox open for a while prevents new flash objects from being displayed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293170 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 298283] Re: [f-spot] Crash when opening f-spot preferences window
Update: Found the source of the crash. This crash occurs when f-spot tries to read the key /apps/f-spot/screensaver/tag_id from gconf and the key does not exist. -- [f-spot] Crash when opening f-spot preferences window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 298283] Re: [f-spot] Crash when opening f-spot preferences window
Workaround: Execute this command in terminal: gconftool-2 --set /apps/f-spot/screensaver/tag_id --type int 0 -- [f-spot] Crash when opening f-spot preferences window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 298283] Re: [f-spot] Crash when opening f-spot preferences window
Correction: This crash occurs if you remove the pre-defined Favorites tag and you haven't already changed the screen saver to use images with a different tag. (The above workaround still works.) -- [f-spot] Crash when opening f-spot preferences window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 298283] Re: [f-spot] Crash when opening f-spot preferences window
Fix is now applied upstream. Hopefully it'll make it into Ubuntu soonish. :-) -- [f-spot] Crash when opening f-spot preferences window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 298192] Re: [ath9k] AR5008/AR5416 802.11n wireless card performs very slowly
Notes: I tried a current snapshot of ath9k from wireless.kernel.org: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download (The snapshot I tested was dated November 10, 2008.) Transfer speeds were much improved with this snapshot. This makes me hopeful that a fixed version of the driver will eventually make its way into the kernel. However, I got a kernel panic while using it so I do not think it is quite ready yet. :-P Numbers: With the stock version of ath9k (included with Ubuntu) I get about 220 KB/sec transferring from an FTP server running on my LAN. With the updated version from wireless.kernel.org the speed is up a little over 3 MB/sec (about what I'd expect). -- [ath9k] AR5008/AR5416 802.11n wireless card performs very slowly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298192 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 299159] [NEW] [firefox-3.0] crash when master password prompt displayed
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 This is Ubuntu 8.10. I've seen this crash on Firefox 3.0.3 and 3.0.4. I have a master password configured to protect my saved passwords in Firefox (Edit-Preferences-Security). When I launch Firefox and go to a site that requires a password, one of two things happens: - The master password prompt is displayed, I put in the master password, and then Firefox is unlocked and works fine for the rest of the session. - Firefox window vanishes (browser has crashed). This happens before the master password prompt is displayed, but only when I navigate to a page that would produce it. The crash happens about 25% of the time. I launched Firefox from the terminal and reproduced the crash, and I saw that is is a Segmentation fault. Backtrace to follow as soon as I can produce one. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: firefox-3.0 3.0.4+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.10.1 ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: firefox-3.0 Uname: Linux 2.6.27-7-generic x86_64 ** Affects: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug -- [firefox-3.0] crash when master password prompt displayed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 299159] Re: [firefox-3.0] crash when master password prompt displayed
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19737427/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ExtensionSummary.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19737428/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: profiles.ini.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19737429/profiles.ini.txt -- [firefox-3.0] crash when master password prompt displayed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 299159] Re: [firefox-3.0] crash when master password prompt displayed
Here's a backtrace, generated via instructions here: https://wiki.edubuntu.org/MozillaTeam/Bugs ** Attachment added: gdb backtrace http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19739436/gdb-firefox.txt -- [firefox-3.0] crash when master password prompt displayed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 298192] [NEW] [ath9k] AR5008/AR5416 802.11n wireless card performs very slowly
Public bug reported: Using Ubuntu 8.10. I have a wireless card with the Atheros AR5008 chipset (802.11n), and it uses the ath9k driver. The performance of this card in Ubuntu is terrible. On an 802.11n network, where I often connect in Windows or OS X at a reported speed of 130 mbps (with none of these speed issues); iwconfig in Ubuntu reports that I am connected at 1 mbps. I do not know if the information iwconfig is presenting is accurate, however, there is a noticeable drop in the speed of local transfers (i.e., transferring files over a LAN is very slow, controlling a machine via VNC crawls). Switching to a 100 mbps resolves all speed issues, when the difference shouldn't be that noticeable. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [ath9k] AR5008/AR5416 802.11n wireless card performs very slowly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298192 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 298192] Re: [ath9k] AR5008/AR5416 802.11n wireless card performs very slowly
Clarification: Switching to a 100 mbps resolves all speed issues, when the difference shouldn't be that noticeable. I meant using a wired connection here. :-P -- [ath9k] AR5008/AR5416 802.11n wireless card performs very slowly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298192 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 298283] [NEW] [f-spot] Crash when opening f-spot preferences window
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: f-spot I reported this over at the Gnome bug tracker. Here is my report: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=560265 (I have also pasted my original report below.) I am posting this here because, after looking at some of the recent changes to f-spot in Ubuntu (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/f-spot), I am wondering if this crash may be caused by one of the recent updates. The preferences window worked when I first installed Ubuntu (shortly after 8.10 release), and stopped after the most recent update came down. (I cannot say for sure that the update caused the problem, but I can say that the preferences window started crashing after the update and I haven't done much else in f-spot that I think would cause a problem. Here is my original report: --- Steps to reproduce: 1. Open f-spot. 2. Go to Edit - Preferences. 3. Boom! Stack trace (from terminal output): Exception in Gtk# callback delegate Note: Applications can use GLib.ExceptionManager.UnhandledException to handle the exception. System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object at FSpot.UI.Dialog.PreferenceDialog.LoadPreference (System.String key) [0x0] at FSpot.UI.Dialog.PreferenceDialog..ctor () [0x0] at FSpot.UI.Dialog.PreferenceDialog.Show () [0x0] at MainWindow.HandlePreferences (System.Object sender, System.EventArgs args) [0x0] at GLib.Signal.voidObjectCallback (IntPtr handle, IntPtr data) [0x0] at GLib.ExceptionManager.RaiseUnhandledException(System.Exception e, Boolean is_terminal) at GLib.Signal.voidObjectCallback(IntPtr handle, IntPtr data) at GLib.Signal.voidObjectCallback(IntPtr , IntPtr ) at Gtk.Application.gtk_main() at Gtk.Application.gtk_main() at Gtk.Application.Run() at Gnome.Program.Run() at FSpot.Driver.Main(System.String[] args) --- Let me know if I can provide any additional information. ** Affects: f-spot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [f-spot] Crash when opening f-spot preferences window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 298283] Re: [f-spot] Crash when opening f-spot preferences window
** Description changed: Binary package hint: f-spot I reported this over at the Gnome bug tracker. Here is my report: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=560265 (I have also pasted my original report below.) I am posting this here because, after looking at some of the recent changes to f-spot in Ubuntu (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/f-spot), I am wondering if this crash may be caused by one of the recent updates. The preferences window worked when I first installed Ubuntu (shortly after 8.10 release), and stopped after the most recent update came down. (I cannot say for sure that the update caused the problem, but I can say that the preferences window started crashing after the update and I haven't done much else in f-spot that I think would cause a problem. Here is my original report: --- Steps to reproduce: 1. Open f-spot. 2. Go to Edit - Preferences. 3. Boom! Stack trace (from terminal output): Exception in Gtk# callback delegate Note: Applications can use GLib.ExceptionManager.UnhandledException to handle the exception. System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object at FSpot.UI.Dialog.PreferenceDialog.LoadPreference (System.String key) [0x0] at FSpot.UI.Dialog.PreferenceDialog..ctor () [0x0] at FSpot.UI.Dialog.PreferenceDialog.Show () [0x0] at MainWindow.HandlePreferences (System.Object sender, System.EventArgs args) [0x0] at GLib.Signal.voidObjectCallback (IntPtr handle, IntPtr data) [0x0] at GLib.ExceptionManager.RaiseUnhandledException(System.Exception e, Boolean is_terminal) at GLib.Signal.voidObjectCallback(IntPtr handle, IntPtr data) at GLib.Signal.voidObjectCallback(IntPtr , IntPtr ) at Gtk.Application.gtk_main() at Gtk.Application.gtk_main() at Gtk.Application.Run() at Gnome.Program.Run() at FSpot.Driver.Main(System.String[] args) --- + Just to be clear, this is f-spot 0.5.0.3 (latest update) in Ubuntu 8.10. + Let me know if I can provide any additional information. -- [f-spot] Crash when opening f-spot preferences window https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297008] [NEW] Apple USB Ethernet Adapter -- does not work after suspend/resume
Public bug reported: This is Ubuntu 8.10. I was pleasantly surprised to find that my Apple USB ethernet adapter works in Ubuntu. :-) However, if I hibernate and resume my machine, it is no longer working. It still shows up in the network manager (and it even seems to think that it is still connected), but I am unable to get any network activity. I see on my switch that the link light is off. I have to unplug the USB adapter and plug it back in for things to start working. Here's its info from lsusb: Bus 003 Device 004: ID 05ac:1402 Apple, Inc. (Perhaps adding it to the USB_QUIRK_RESET_RESUME list will fix it?) ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Apple USB Ethernet Adapter -- does not work after suspend/resume https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297008 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
