[Bug 1697536] Re: nm strongswan gui doesn't have a way to enter pre-shared key

2021-08-30 Thread Darik Horn
This defect persists into Ubuntu 21.04 Hirsute Hippo.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1697536

Title:
  nm strongswan gui doesn't have a way to enter pre-shared key

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-strongswan/+bug/1697536/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1532198] Re: [MIR] zfs-linux

2016-05-05 Thread Darik Horn
@rlaager,  zed first shipped in the zfsutils package, and the `Replaces`
line was required for a smooth upgrade between releases.  It can/should
be dropped now.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1532198

Title:
  [MIR] zfs-linux

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfs-linux/+bug/1532198/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1189242] Re: mldonkey out of date

2013-07-04 Thread Darik Horn
The mldonkey package was recently pulled from Sid to Saucy, and it
builds cleanly on Precise.

This worked for me on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS:

# dget https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+files/mldonkey_3.1.3-1.dsc
# cd mldonkey-3.1.3
# apt-get build-dep mldonkey
# dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1189242

Title:
  mldonkey out of date

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mldonkey/+bug/1189242/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1003633] Re: Escape plus character in apt HTTP requests to work around Amazon S3 bug

2013-01-26 Thread Darik Horn
This non-conformance bug works in both directions, so an easy kludge is
to hard link all file names like this:

$ ln foobar-1.2+baz3_all.deb  'foobar-1.2 baz3_all.deb'

And sync to the s3 bucket normally.  Afterwards, the key can be called
through http with a literal + character or the %2B escape.  Most
clients like `apt-get` and `wget` will write out a file with the correct
name using either form in the URL.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003633

Title:
  Escape plus character in apt HTTP requests to work around Amazon S3
  bug

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1003633/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1103319] [NEW] mountall source code repository is stale

2013-01-22 Thread Darik Horn
Public bug reported:

Running `bzr branch lp:ubuntu/precise/mountall` currently returns the
old mountall-2.36 source code, but mountall-2.36.3 is expected because
it is currently published to precise-updates.

LP #714622 suggests a reason for this glitch and a solution for it.

** Affects: mountall (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1103319

Title:
  mountall source code repository is stale

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/1103319/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1103319] Re: mountall source code repository is stale

2013-01-22 Thread Darik Horn
https://launchpad.net/bugs/714622

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1103319

Title:
  mountall source code repository is stale

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/1103319/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 973741] [NEW] s3cmd: segmentation fault for all https operations in libcrypto.so.1.0.0

2012-04-04 Thread Darik Horn
Public bug reported:

All `s3cmd` commands fail with a Segmentation Fault on Ubuntu 12.04
Precise Pangolin if `use_https = True` is set in the `$HOME/.s3cfg`
file.


$ apt-cache policy s3cmd
s3cmd:
  Installed: 1.0.0-1
  Candidate: 1.0.0-1
  Version table:
 *** 1.0.0-1 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/universe amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status


$ s3cmd du
DEBUG: Updating Config.Config encoding - UTF-8
DEBUG: Updating Config.Config follow_symlinks - False
DEBUG: Updating Config.Config verbosity - 30
DEBUG: Unicodising 'du' using UTF-8
DEBUG: Command: du
DEBUG: SignHeaders: 'GET\n\n\n\nx-amz-date:Wed, 04 Apr 2012 20:33:06 +\n/'
DEBUG: CreateRequest: resource[uri]=/
DEBUG: SignHeaders: 'GET\n\n\n\nx-amz-date:Wed, 04 Apr 2012 20:33:06 +\n/'
DEBUG: Processing request, please wait...
DEBUG: get_hostname(None): s3.amazonaws.com
DEBUG: format_uri(): /
Segmentation fault


$ gdb python
GNU gdb (Ubuntu/Linaro 7.4-2012.02-0ubuntu2) 7.4-2012.02
Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.  Type show copying
and show warranty for details.
This GDB was configured as x86_64-linux-gnu.
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
http://bugs.launchpad.net/gdb-linaro/...
Reading symbols from /usr/bin/python...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
(gdb) run /usr/bin/s3cmd du
Starting program: /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/s3cmd du
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1.

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x7721b031 in RC4 () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0
(gdb) backtrace
#0  0x7721b031 in RC4 () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0
#1  0x00db in ?? ()
#2  0x009f in ?? ()
#3  0x00ed91f0 in ?? ()
#4  0x77281609 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0
#5  0x77583b0f in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.0.0
#6  0x7757adb8 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.0.0
#7  0x7757b0e4 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.0.0
#8  0x0056f7ec in ?? ()
#9  0x00562ad2 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx ()
#10 0x0056a166 in PyEval_EvalCodeEx ()
#11 0x0056312e in PyEval_EvalFrameEx ()
#12 0x0056a166 in PyEval_EvalCodeEx ()
#13 0x0056312e in PyEval_EvalFrameEx ()
#14 0x00563070 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx ()
#15 0x0056a166 in PyEval_EvalCodeEx ()
#16 0x0056312e in PyEval_EvalFrameEx ()
#17 0x0056a166 in PyEval_EvalCodeEx ()
#18 0x0056312e in PyEval_EvalFrameEx ()
#19 0x00563070 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx ()
#20 0x0056a166 in PyEval_EvalCodeEx ()
#21 0x0056312e in PyEval_EvalFrameEx ()
#22 0x0056a166 in PyEval_EvalCodeEx ()
#23 0x0056312e in PyEval_EvalFrameEx ()
#24 0x00563070 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx ()
#25 0x00563070 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx ()
#26 0x00563070 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx ()
#27 0x00563070 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx ()
#28 0x0056a166 in PyEval_EvalCodeEx ()
#29 0x0055f10b in ?? ()
#30 0x0055f9d4 in PyRun_FileExFlags ()
#31 0x0055fc41 in PyRun_SimpleFileExFlags ()
#32 0x0056102d in Py_Main ()
#33 0x768e576d in __libc_start_main () from 
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
#34 0x0041b971 in _start ()

** Affects: s3cmd (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/973741

Title:
  s3cmd: segmentation fault for all https operations in
  libcrypto.so.1.0.0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/s3cmd/+bug/973741/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 578045] Re: Upgrading packaged Ubuntu application unreasonably involves upgrading entire OS

2011-12-15 Thread Darik Horn
@mpt is correct.

Having a well known PPA with a good reputation is better than being an
official project member.  You get most of the benefits of being a
project member with none of the overhead costs of officially joining.

The community is familiar and comfortable with using Launchpad to get
current software.  PPAs provide the easy 80% of an app store
implementation for Ubuntu.

The has the side-effect of making Ubuntu sticky.  People that try to
leave Ubuntu often discover that they depend on the convenience of PPA
packages.  This dynamic probably explains the Canonical Ltd position on
the https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/188564 ticket.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578045

Title:
  Upgrading packaged Ubuntu application unreasonably involves upgrading
  entire OS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/null/+bug/578045/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 578045] Re: Upgrading packaged Ubuntu application unreasonably involves upgrading entire OS

2011-12-15 Thread Darik Horn
The subtle and disruptive suggestion in this thread is that the
backports and universe sections are unnecessary legacy baggage, and
certain important things like the web browser and office suite should
not be in the main section.

From the customer perspective, application software is the profit center
and the exciting reason to use Ubuntu.  Things that are used daily, like
the web browser and office suite, should always be current and therefore
provided by a rolling channel.

From the customer perspective, everything else is a cost center and
hygiene factor.  They don't care about the components in main unless
their laptop doesn't sleep, or their audio is garbled, or they can't
play their favorite flash game.

Furthermore, a smaller and tighter main section might have prevented or
mitigated some earlier Ubuntu release mistakes, especially those caused
by Canonical staffers wedging unfinished product into distribution to
hit bonus targets.  Things like MetaTracker and PulseAudio would have
been less frustrating if they were quickly iterated in a rolling
channel.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578045

Title:
  Upgrading packaged Ubuntu application unreasonably involves upgrading
  entire OS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/null/+bug/578045/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 832387] Re: Error changing VM configuration: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'xpathEval'

2011-11-13 Thread Darik Horn
This bug persists into Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric.

A workaround is to remove and re-add the virtual disk at the initial
hardware customization dialog.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/832387

Title:
  Error changing VM configuration: 'NoneType' object has no attribute
  'xpathEval'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virt-manager/+bug/832387/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 303276] Re: Lenovo X61 hangs with flashing caps lock LED.

2011-11-12 Thread Darik Horn
@fabiomarconi:  This bug was never fixed in affected Ubuntu releases and
it certainly isn't invalid.  It does, however, seem to be resolved in
Oneiric.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303276

Title:
  Lenovo X61 hangs with flashing caps lock LED.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/303276/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 846907] Re: Thunar is unable to open smb share. Null as share type

2011-09-17 Thread Darik Horn
Upstream fixed this regression in the XFCE 4.8 release branch, per the
linked bugzilla ticket.

Consider updating Thunar for the Oneiric release.  Samba breakage in
Xubuntu will affect many people.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/846907

Title:
  Thunar is unable to open smb share. Null as share type

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunar/+bug/846907/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 846907] Re: Thunar is unable to open smb share. Null as share type

2011-09-17 Thread Darik Horn
** Bug watch added: Xfce Bugzilla #7774
   http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7774

** Also affects: thunar via
   http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7774
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/846907

Title:
  Thunar is unable to open smb share. Null as share type

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunar/+bug/846907/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 812088] [NEW] Oneiric regression: dkms invokes the PRE_BUILD command from the wrong working directory

2011-07-17 Thread Darik Horn
Public bug reported:

Upstream commit Make the install command chain all the way back to
adding the module (SHA:  e409c1681d433c4bea04deb2a9c2be6d02b3f83c)
caused a regression of LP #702638 in the dkms-2.2.0.1-0ubuntu1 release
for Ubuntu Oneiric.

The current working directory for PRE_ and POST_ invocations is the
system root.

For example, if PRE_BUILD=./configure is set in the dkms.conf file,
then generated files like Makefile and config.status are written to
/.

** Affects: dkms (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/812088

Title:
  Oneiric regression: dkms invokes the PRE_BUILD command from the wrong
  working directory

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dkms/+bug/812088/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 812088] Re: Oneiric regression: dkms invokes the PRE_BUILD command from the wrong working directory

2011-07-17 Thread Darik Horn
** Patch added: 0001-Change-directory-for-PRE_-and-POST_-invocations.patch
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dkms/+bug/812088/+attachment/2214175/+files/0001-Change-directory-for-PRE_-and-POST_-invocations.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/812088

Title:
  Oneiric regression: dkms invokes the PRE_BUILD command from the wrong
  working directory

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dkms/+bug/812088/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 693644] Re: totem doesn't pass RTSP credentials to gstreamer

2011-07-08 Thread Darik Horn
This bug persists in Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal.

$ apt-cache policy totem
totem:
  Installed: 2.32.0-0ubuntu10
  Candidate: 2.32.0-0ubuntu10
  Version table:
 *** 2.32.0-0ubuntu10 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

$ totem rtsp://netcam/nphMpeg4/g726-640x480
** Message: Error: Could not read from resource.
gstrtspsrc.c(4536): gst_rtspsrc_send (): 
/GstPlayBin2:play/GstURIDecodeBin:uridecodebin0/GstRTSPSrc:source:
Got error response: 401 (Unauthorized).

** Message: Error: No URI set
gstplaybin2.c(3440): setup_next_source (): /GstPlayBin2:play

The video stream is opened and nothing is printed to the terminal if the
username and password are passed in the URI.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693644

Title:
  totem doesn't pass RTSP credentials to gstreamer

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/693644/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 691390] Re: [needs-packaging] asterisk-1.8

2011-06-14 Thread Darik Horn
Digium is now packaging asterisk-1.8 for Ubuntu upstream:

  https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Asterisk+Packages

The support schedule for asterisk-1.4 and asterisk-1.6 is here:

  https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Asterisk+Versions

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/691390

Title:
  [needs-packaging] asterisk-1.8

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/asterisk/+bug/691390/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 641417] Re: Maverick: the Reply button in Evolution points the wrong way

2011-06-02 Thread Darik Horn
No, this is resolved in Natty.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641417

Title:
  Maverick: the Reply button in Evolution points the wrong way

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 748764] Re: npviewer flash video is blocky

2011-04-28 Thread Darik Horn
This bug persists with Adobe Flash 10.2.159.1 into the Ubuntu Natty
11.04 release.

Flash video in Firefox is chunky, but it works perfectly in Google
Chrome.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748764

Title:
  npviewer flash video is blocky

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 558416] Re: Invalid problem report from apport

2011-04-11 Thread Darik Horn
I began getting this error near the Natty beta release, usually during
package upgrades.  It wasn't happening on my Natty workstation in the
early alphas.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/558416

Title:
  Invalid problem report from apport

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 745781] [NEW] natty ia32-libs is missing /usr/lib32/libnss3.so

2011-03-30 Thread Darik Horn
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: ia32-libs

This ia32-libs package currently in Natty does not provide the
/usr/lib32/libnss3.so file.  Programs that require this library fail to
load with a wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64 error.

Downgrading to the ia32-libs package in Maverick resolves compatibility
problems with 32-bit programs that require NSS.

$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu Natty (development branch)
Release:11.04

$ apt-cache policy ia32-libs
ia32-libs:
  Installed: 20090808ubuntu9
  Candidate: 20090808ubuntu10
  Version table:
 20090808ubuntu10 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/universe amd64 Packages
 *** 20090808ubuntu9 0
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

$ apt-file search libnss3.so
firefox: /usr/lib/firefox-4.0/libnss3.so
firefox-dbg: /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/firefox-4.0/libnss3.so
ia32-libs: /usr/lib32/libnss3.so.1d
libnss3: /usr/lib/libnss3.so
libnss3-1d: /usr/lib/libnss3.so.1d
libnss3-dbg: /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libnss3.so

** Affects: ia32-libs (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745781

Title:
  natty ia32-libs is missing /usr/lib32/libnss3.so

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 723721] Re: Sync lshw 02.15-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2011-02-23 Thread Darik Horn
This package has a regression on LaunchPad bug #193373 and LaunchPad
bug #208399.

Why was the privacy.patch removed from the 2.15 build without a
changelog entry?   The lshw package was NMU'd the last time this
happened.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723721

Title:
  Sync lshw 02.15-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 723721] Re: Sync lshw 02.15-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2011-02-23 Thread Darik Horn
Nevermind.  My builder incorrectly imported the wheezy/sid package.

I was too quick comment on the ticket.  Sorry.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723721

Title:
  Sync lshw 02.15-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 202952] Re: Add native ZFS to Ubuntu

2011-02-22 Thread Darik Horn
I packaged the native ZFS modules for Ubuntu in this PPA:

  https://launchpad.net/~dajhorn/+archive/zfs

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202952

Title:
  Add native ZFS to Ubuntu

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 714926] Re: Epoch number causes apt to downgrade to older versions after AIR auto-updates itself

2011-02-08 Thread Darik Horn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 674190 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/674190

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 674190
   Stuck in Upgrade Loop
 * You can subscribe to bug 674190 by following this link: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adobeair/+bug/674190/+subscribe

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/714926

Title:
  Epoch number causes apt to downgrade to older versions after AIR auto-
  updates itself

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 705014] Re: CVS-2011-0495: AST-2011-001: Asterisk: Stack based buffer overflow by forming an outgoing SIP request with specially-crafted caller ID information

2011-01-19 Thread Darik Horn
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #610487
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610487

** Also affects: asterisk (Debian) via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610487
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

** Visibility changed to: Public

** Summary changed:

- CVS-2011-0495: AST-2011-001: Asterisk: Stack based buffer overflow by forming 
an outgoing SIP request with specially-crafted caller ID information
+ CVE-2011-0495: AST-2011-001: Asterisk: Stack based buffer overflow by forming 
an outgoing SIP request with specially-crafted caller ID information

** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: asterisk
  
  All of the Asterisk packages in Ubuntu need to be patched for
  AST-2011-001, which is tentatively CVE-2011-0495.
  
  See:  http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/security/AST-2011-001.html
  
- Although Asterisk in currently in the universe repository,  it would be
+ Although Asterisk in currently in the universe repository,  it would
  nevertheless be appreciated to get the security fix.  Debian already has
  the fix pending in their pkg-voip tree.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705014

Title:
  CVE-2011-0495: AST-2011-001: Asterisk: Stack based buffer overflow by
  forming an outgoing SIP request with specially-crafted caller ID
  information

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 476510] Re: Belkin F8T016 USB adapter not recognized as bluetooth device

2011-01-14 Thread Darik Horn
The Belkin F8T016 is currently compatible with my fully updated Maverick
computer.  This ticket is probably stale.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/476510

Title:
  Belkin F8T016 USB adapter not recognized as bluetooth device

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 702638] [NEW] dkms invokes the PRE_BUILD command from the wrong working directory

2011-01-13 Thread Darik Horn
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: dkms

If a PRE_BUILD command is defined in a dkms.conf file, then it is
invoked as $dkms_tree/$module/$module_version/source/$pre_build in the
current working directory.  This is incorrect behavior because PRE_BUILD
could modify or generate source files.  Also note that
$dkms_tree/$module/$module_version/source/ is linked to
/usr/src/$module-$module_version/ and should be therefore be read-only
regardless.

Expected behavior is that PRE_BUILD be always invoked from the
$dkms_tree/$module/$module_version/build/ temporary area.

The attached patch results in the expected behavior.  I noticed this
glitch because I'm working on a DKMS package for the ZFS filesystem; the
SPL module uses a configure script to create some things in the build
area.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: dkms 2.1.1.2-3ubuntu1.1 [modified: usr/sbin/dkms]
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-24.42-generic 2.6.35.8
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-24-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zcommon znvpair zavl zunicode nvidia
Architecture: amd64
Date: Thu Jan 13 15:47:34 2011
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: dkms

** Affects: dkms (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/702638

Title:
  dkms invokes the PRE_BUILD command from the wrong working directory

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 702638] Re: dkms invokes the PRE_BUILD command from the wrong working directory

2011-01-13 Thread Darik Horn

** Patch added: Call PRE_BUILD from the build/ area instead of the source/ 
area.
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/702638/+attachment/1793146/+files/dkms.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/702638

Title:
  dkms invokes the PRE_BUILD command from the wrong working directory

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 691390] Re: [needs-packaging] asterisk-1.8

2011-01-02 Thread Darik Horn
The Asterisk 1.8.1.1 packaging currently in the pkg-voip experimental
branch is compatible with Ubuntu Lucid and Ubuntu Maverick, so you don't
need to redo it.  (Early commits did however have incompatibilities.)

I've been getting a small number of support inquiries for this PPA

  https://edge.launchpad.net/~dajhorn/+archive/pkg-voip

so there is demand for Asterisk 1.8 on Ubuntu and the Debian packaging
by Tzafrir Cohen seems good.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/691390

Title:
  [needs-packaging] asterisk-1.8

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 693644] [NEW] totem doesn't pass RTSP credentials to gstreamer

2010-12-22 Thread Darik Horn
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: totem

I have a Panasonic Network camera that provides an authenticated RTSP
video stream.

Totem can play the stream if the username and password are passed in the
URL like this:

  $ totem rtsp://me:passw...@netcam/nphMpeg4/g726-640x480

Totem cannot play the stream if invoked like this:

  $ totem rtsp://netcam/nphMpeg4/g726-640x480
  ** Message: Error: Could not read from resource.
  gstrtspsrc.c(4408): gst_rtspsrc_send (): 
/GstPlayBin2:play/GstURIDecodeBin:uridecodebin0/GstRTSPSrc:source:
  Got error response: 401 (Unauthorized).

The Password requested for RTSP server dialog opens.  If I input the
username and password here and click the Connect button, then this is
additionally printed to stdout:

  ** Message: Error: No URI set
  gstplaybin2.c(3475): setup_next_source (): /GstPlayBin2:play

and Totem presents a dialog that says

  (-) An error occurred
  Location not found.

Expected behavior is that the RTSP video stream is opened even if the
username and password are passed through the dialog.

  $ lsb_release -rd
  Description:  Ubuntu 10.10
  Release:  10.10
  
  $ apt-cache policy totem
  totem:
Installed: 2.32.0-0ubuntu1
Candidate: 2.32.0-0ubuntu1
Version table:
   *** 2.32.0-0ubuntu1 0
  500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/main amd64 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: totem 2.32.0-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-24.42-generic 2.6.35.8
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-24-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed Dec 22 19:41:34 2010
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: totem

** Affects: totem (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693644

Title:
  totem doesn't pass RTSP credentials to gstreamer

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 693644] Re: totem doesn't pass RTSP credentials to gstreamer

2010-12-22 Thread Darik Horn


-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/693644

Title:
  totem doesn't pass RTSP credentials to gstreamer

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 603599] Re: Please build the vmwgfx driver

2010-12-07 Thread Darik Horn
The vmwgfx driver was disabled in Maverick per Bug #606139, and
CONFIG_DRM_VMWGFX is currently disabled in the Natty kernel.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/603599

Title:
  Please build the vmwgfx driver

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 312403] Re: Lenovo ideapad S10 internal microphone doesn't work

2010-11-29 Thread Darik Horn
This bug is resolved on my hardware since at least the Maverick release.
Last activity has been more than a year ago, so perhaps this bug should
be closed.

-- 
Lenovo ideapad S10 internal microphone doesn't work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/312403
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 626974] Re: ABI change in xorg 1.9 breaks legacy nvidia-96 drivers in Maverick

2010-11-24 Thread Darik Horn
Petr:  Delete the /etc/xorg.conf file, toggle the nvidia-96 driver
off/on at System - Administration - Additional Drivers, and restart
the computer.

The Failed to allocate/map the primary surface error is caused by a
missing AddARGBGLXVisuals option in the xorg.conf file.  Jockey creates
a correct xorg.conf file.

Some cards don't start if this option is missing, and others get GL
artifacts like the desktop wallpaper being used in all transparencies.

-- 
ABI change in xorg 1.9 breaks legacy nvidia-96 drivers in Maverick
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626974
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 626974] Re: ABI change in xorg 1.9 breaks legacy nvidia-96 drivers in Maverick

2010-11-22 Thread Darik Horn
Notice the PPA version, where I used a dot instead of a tilde.

  $ dpkg --compare-versions 0.5.10-0ubuntu5.2 gt 0.5.10-0ubuntu5.dajhorn2
  $ echo $?
  1

My computer already got Alberto's nvidia-96 from maverick-proposed, but
it won't get jockey from maverick-proposed if it is published with a
regular debchange increment.

Do this to disable the PPA and get the official jockey release if/when
it becomes available in maverick-proposed:

  $ sudo apt-add-repository --remove ppa:dajhorn/nvidia-96
  $ sudo apt-get update
  $ sudo apt-get install --reinstall jockey-common jockey-gtk

-- 
ABI change in xorg 1.9 breaks legacy nvidia-96 drivers in Maverick
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626974
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 680203] [NEW] `apt-add-repository --remove` doesn't remove deb-src lines

2010-11-22 Thread Darik Horn
Public bug reported:

With the same sourceline argument, the `apt-add-repository` command is
not entirely reversed by the `apt-add-repository -r` command.

For example:

  $ sudo apt-add-repository ppa:dajhorn/ppa
  $ cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/dajhorn-ppa-maverick.list
  deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/dajhorn/ppa/ubuntu maverick main
  deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/dajhorn/ppa/ubuntu maverick main
  $ sudo apt-add-repository --remove ppa:dajhorn/ppa
  $ cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/dajhorn-ppa-maverick.list
 deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/dajhorn/ppa/ubuntu maverick main

Notice that the deb-src line persists.  The expected behavior is that
all lines added by `apt-add-repository` are removed and/or the list file
is entirely deleted.

Furthermore, `apt-add-repository --remove` doesn't handle an explicit
deb-src line:

  $ apt-add-repository --remove 'deb-src 
http://ppa.launchpad.net/dajhorn/ppa/ubuntu maverick main'
  $ echo $?
  0
  $ cat dajhorn-ppa-maverick.list
  deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/dajhorn/ppa/ubuntu maverick main

The expected behavior is the deletion of the given deb-src line.

If the sourceline argument doesn't exist, then an error message is
emitted, but the result code is incorrect:

  $ apt-add-repository --remove 'deb-src 
http://ppa.launchpad.net/dajhorn/ppa/bogus maverick main'
  Error: 'deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/dajhorn/ppa/bogus maverick main' 
doesn't exist in a sourcelist file
  $ echo $?
  0  


$ apt-cache policy python-software-properties
python-software-properties:
  Installed: 0.76.7
  Candidate: 0.76.7
  Version table:
 *** 0.76.7 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 10.10
Release:10.10

** Affects: software-properties (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
`apt-add-repository --remove` doesn't remove deb-src lines
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/680203
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 647919] Re: add-apt-repository doesn't add deb-src lines

2010-11-22 Thread Darik Horn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 399711 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/399711

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 399711
   add-apt-repository ppa:username does not add deb-src entry
 * You can subscribe to bug 399711 by following this link: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/399711/+subscribe

-- 
add-apt-repository doesn't add deb-src lines
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/647919
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 621977] Re: If deb-src lines are going to be added automatically, they shouldn't be enabled and slowing down apt-get update.

2010-11-22 Thread Darik Horn
See the discussion in Bug #399711.  The deb-src line is being added as a
design choice.

-- 
If deb-src lines are going to be added automatically, they shouldn't be enabled 
and slowing down apt-get update.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621977
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 653851] Re: xorg is jerky, uses too much cpu, small display bugs

2010-11-20 Thread Darik Horn
This problem resolved for me on several computers when I installed the
stable xorg stack from the x-updates ppa:

  https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/x-updates

-- 
xorg is jerky, uses too much cpu, small display bugs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653851
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 677457] Re: Ubuntu versioning system conflicts

2010-11-19 Thread Darik Horn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 674190 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/674190

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 674190
   Stuck in Upgrade Loop
 * You can subscribe to bug 674190 by following this link: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adobeair/+bug/674190/+subscribe

-- 
Ubuntu versioning system conflicts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/677457
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 135358] Re: vmware-player not installable

2010-11-17 Thread Darik Horn
Paulo:  libssl0.9.7 is incompatible with libssl0.9.8, and the kernel
modules for a gutsy-era VMware Player won't compile for the Maverick
kernel regardless.

The vmware-player package is not currently published in the Ubuntu
partner repository.  You'll get a better result installing from
upstream:

  http://downloads.vmware.com/d/info/desktop_downloads/vmware_player/3_0

-- 
vmware-player not installable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135358
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 626974] Re: ABI change in xorg 1.9 breaks legacy nvidia-96 drivers in Maverick

2010-11-09 Thread Darik Horn
James: You must `sudo ./NVIDIA-Linux-x86-*.run --uninstall` the package
that you got from the Nvidia web site before installing the deb package.
If you installed both, then uninstall both before reinstalling the deb.

DKMS improperly clobbers the local nvidia.ko module and you'll get
version mismatches and a mangled configuration.  If you want to
regenerate the xorg.conf file, then run `sudo nvidia-xconfig` at a
terminal prompt.  Also note that the Jockey driver manager doesn't
recognize the oldest and newest Nvidia drivers but they still work
properly.  Ignore he warning.

This ticket is the wrong place to do technical support.  The best place
to ask is the PPA page, the IRC channel, or the forums.

-- 
ABI change in xorg 1.9 breaks legacy nvidia-96 drivers in Maverick
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626974
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 626974] Re: ABI change in xorg 1.9 breaks legacy nvidia-96 drivers in Maverick

2010-11-09 Thread Darik Horn
I reverted the patch in jockey that ignores nvidia-96 and put it into
the PPA.

If jockey still doesn't automatically update the xorg.conf file then do
this:

1.  Ensure that the nvidia-common package is installed.  Jockey needs
nvidia-common to detect nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 hardware.

2.  Backup and delete the /etc/X11/xorg.conf file.

3.  Toggle the driver in System - Administration - Additional Drivers.
(eg:  Deactivate, Activate)

4.  Check the /var/log/jockey.log file for warnings and errors.  This
log file is usually empty unless something is glitched.

-- 
ABI change in xorg 1.9 breaks legacy nvidia-96 drivers in Maverick
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626974
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 626974] Re: ABI change in xorg 1.9 breaks legacy nvidia-96 drivers in Maverick

2010-11-08 Thread Darik Horn
I've packaged the new nvidia-96 driver for Maverick in this PPA:

  https://launchpad.net/~dajhorn/+archive/nvidia-96/

-- 
ABI change in xorg 1.9 breaks legacy nvidia-96 drivers in Maverick
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626974
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 482597] Re: Empathy dialpad tones don't work

2010-11-01 Thread Darik Horn
The DMTF in Empathy seems to have regressed from Lucid to Maverick.
Most IVRs are not recognizing keypad tones from Empathy.

-- 
Empathy dialpad tones don't work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482597
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 646799] Re: [needs-packaging] scr - Skype Call Recorder

2010-10-30 Thread Darik Horn
I've package the Skype call recorder for Lucid and Maverick in this PPA:

  https://launchpad.net/~dajhorn/+archive/skype-call-recorder/

-- 
[needs-packaging] scr - Skype Call Recorder
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646799
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 655039] Re: package apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-10-05 Thread Darik Horn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 621837 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621837

If this bug has broken a production system, then don't touch the package
(until it is fixed) and just start Apache manually like this:

  # /etc/init.d/apache start

-- 
package apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655039
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 655039] Re: package apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-10-05 Thread Darik Horn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 621837 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621837

A kludge that will let the bad apache2.2-common package install is:

1.  Open the '/var/lib/dpkg/info/apache2.2-common.postrm' file in a text
editor.

2.  Go to line 77 and disable the `a2enmod` command by prefixing it with
a colon character like this:

  if dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt 2.2.15-1~0; then
: a2enmod -q reqtimeout
  fi

3.  Run `dpkg --configure -a` and the apache2.2-common installation will
finish.

4.  Remember that you applied this change.

-- 
package apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655039
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 655039] Re: package apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-10-05 Thread Darik Horn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 621837 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621837

Typo!

The file correct file name is:
/var/lib/dpkg/info/apache2.2-common.postinst

-- 
package apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655039
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 655039] Re: package apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-10-05 Thread Darik Horn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 621837 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621837

If this bug has broken a production system, then don't touch the package
(until it is fixed) and just start Apache manually like this:

  # /etc/init.d/apache start

-- 
package apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655039
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 655039] Re: package apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-10-05 Thread Darik Horn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 621837 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621837

A kludge that will let the bad apache2.2-common package install is:

1.  Open the '/var/lib/dpkg/info/apache2.2-common.postrm' file in a text
editor.

2.  Go to line 77 and disable the `a2enmod` command by prefixing it with
a colon character like this:

  if dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt 2.2.15-1~0; then
: a2enmod -q reqtimeout
  fi

3.  Run `dpkg --configure -a` and the apache2.2-common installation will
finish.

4.  Remember that you applied this change.

-- 
package apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655039
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 655039] Re: package apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2010-10-05 Thread Darik Horn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 621837 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621837

Typo!

The file correct file name is:
/var/lib/dpkg/info/apache2.2-common.postinst

-- 
package apache2.2-common 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.2 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655039
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 626974] Re: ABI change in xorg 1.9 breaks legacy nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 drivers in Maverick

2010-10-04 Thread Darik Horn
I don't see the new 173.14.28 driver in the Ubuntu x-swat queue, so I
updated the nvidia-173 package and put it here:

  https://launchpad.net/~dajhorn/+archive/x-updates/

This updated Nvidia driver is compatible with my 32-bit Ubuntu 10.10
Maverick RC computer where I have older hardware.  The 64-bit build
installs cleanly, but I haven't tested it.

An updated nvidia-96 driver isn't yet availabe on the upstream FTP
server.

-- 
ABI change in xorg 1.9 breaks legacy nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 drivers in 
Maverick
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626974
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 626974] Re: ABI change in xorg 1.9 breaks legacy nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 drivers in Maverick

2010-10-01 Thread Darik Horn
Kudos to Aaron at Nvidia for providing excellent ongoing Linux support.

-- 
ABI change in xorg 1.9 breaks legacy nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 drivers in 
Maverick
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626974
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 626974] Re: ABI change in xorg 1.9 breaks legacy nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 drivers in Maverick

2010-09-30 Thread Darik Horn
An NVIDIA staffer said that the nvidia-173 drivers are being updated for
X.org 1.9 here:

http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=2325872postcount=2

-- 
ABI change in xorg 1.9 breaks legacy nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 drivers in 
Maverick
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626974
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 641417] [NEW] Maverick: the Reply button in Evolution points the wrong way

2010-09-17 Thread Darik Horn
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: evolution

In nearly all MUAs, the arrows on the Reply and Reply All buttons point
leftward.  The default Ambiance theme in Maverick reverses this
convention.

To convince myself that this is a valid complaint, I collected
screenshots from some other popular mail readers, which are attached.

This bug will cause unnecessary retraining of regular users because the
Reply button now looks like the Forward button everywhere else.

** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: maverick

-- 
Maverick: the Reply button in Evolution points the wrong way
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641417
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 641417] Re: Maverick: the Reply button in Evolution points the wrong way

2010-09-17 Thread Darik Horn

** Attachment added: Gallery Of Reply Buttons.png
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641417/+attachment/1598706/+files/Gallery%20Of%20Reply%20Buttons.png

** Tags added: maverick

-- 
Maverick: the Reply button in Evolution points the wrong way
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641417
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 97240] Re: dh-make-php_0.1.3: dh-make-pecl fails to build all packages

2010-09-14 Thread Darik Horn
No, this bug was fixed a long time ago, so I'm closing it.

** Changed in: dh-make-php (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Fix Released

-- 
dh-make-php_0.1.3: dh-make-pecl fails to build all packages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97240
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 616394] Re: dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData

2010-08-30 Thread Darik Horn
Tightening the driver dependencies in Maverick might prevent an
unexpected breakage for upgrades from Lucid.

For example:

  Package: nvidia-173
  Depends: x11-common (= 1:7.0.0), make, sed ( 3.0), dkms, linux-libc-dev, 
libc6-dev, linux-headers-generic | linux-headers, patch, acpid, libc6 (= 2.3), 
libx11-6 (= 0), libxext6 (= 0), zlib1g (= 1:1.1.4), xserver-common ( 
2:1.9.0)

Perhaps also:

  Package: xserver-common
  Version: 2:1.9.0-0ubuntu1
  Breaks: nvidia-96, nvidia-173

-- 
dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 626974] [NEW] ABI change in xorg 1.9 breaks legacy nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 drivers in Maverick

2010-08-30 Thread Darik Horn
Public bug reported:

Per bug 616394,  xorg-1.9 is incompatible with the nvidia-96 and
nvidia-173 driver packages that are currently in Maverick.  These are
the proprietary drivers in Ubuntu for Nvidia hardware prior to the
GeForce 6000 series.

Perhaps a Breaks: nvidia-96, nvidia-173 or some such line could be
added to the xserver-common control file to keep the X.org 1.7
installation from Lucid intact during an upgrade to Maverick.

** Affects: xorg-server (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
ABI change in xorg 1.9 breaks legacy nvidia-96 and nvidia-173 drivers in 
Maverick
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/626974
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 616394] Re: dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData

2010-08-30 Thread Darik Horn
I've opened bug 626974 to get the attention of the X maintainers.

-- 
dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 616394] RelatedPackageVersions.txt

2010-08-27 Thread Darik Horn
apport information

** Attachment added: RelatedPackageVersions.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/616394/+attachment/1523102/+files/RelatedPackageVersions.txt

-- 
dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 616394] PciDisplay.txt

2010-08-27 Thread Darik Horn
apport information

** Attachment added: PciDisplay.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/616394/+attachment/1523098/+files/PciDisplay.txt

-- 
dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 616394] GdmLog.txt

2010-08-27 Thread Darik Horn
apport information

** Attachment added: GdmLog.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/616394/+attachment/1523093/+files/GdmLog.txt

-- 
dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 616394] .proc.driver.nvidia.cards.0.txt

2010-08-27 Thread Darik Horn
apport information

** Attachment added: .proc.driver.nvidia.cards.0.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/616394/+attachment/1523090/+files/.proc.driver.nvidia.cards.0.txt

-- 
dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 616394] Re: dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData

2010-08-27 Thread Darik Horn
.proc.driver.nvidia.agp.card:
 Fast Writes:Supported
 SBA:Supported
 AGP Rates:  4x 2x 1x 
 Registers:  0x1f000217:0x
.proc.driver.nvidia.agp.host.bridge:
 Host Bridge:PCI device 8086:1a30
 Fast Writes:Supported
 SBA:Supported
 AGP Rates:  4x 2x 1x 
 Registers:  0x1f000217:0x
.proc.driver.nvidia.agp.status: Status:  Disabled
.proc.driver.nvidia.version:
 NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86 Kernel Module  173.14.27  Tue Jul 13 20:39:52 
PDT 2010
 GCC version:  gcc version 4.4.5 20100824 (prerelease) (Ubuntu/Linaro 
4.4.4-9ubuntu2)
Architecture: i386
CurrentDmesg:
 [9.192356] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810
 [9.524888] ata2.00: configured for UDMA/100
 [9.524911] ata2: EH complete
 [   10.234765] EXT4-fs (sda1): re-mounted. Opts: errors=remount-ro,commit=0
 [   19.344064] eth0: no IPv6 routers present
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
DkmsStatus:
 nvidia-173, 173.14.27, 2.6.35-19-generic, i686: installed 
 nvidia-173, 173.14.27, 2.6.35-14-generic, i686: installed
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Alpha i386 (20100803.1)
MachineType: System Manufacturer System Name
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: nvidia-graphics-drivers-96 (not installed)
ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.35-19-generic 
root=UUID=ee20e538-deae-490d-9c76-661b3b98ca96 ro quiet splash
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-19.26-generic 2.6.35.3
Tags: maverick maverick
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-19-generic i686
UserGroups:
 
dmi.bios.date: 08/06/2003
dmi.bios.vendor: Award Software, Inc.
dmi.bios.version: ASUS P4B533 ACPI BIOS Revision 1015 Beta 003
dmi.board.name: P4B533
dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
dmi.board.version: REV 1.xx
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890
dmi.chassis.type: 7
dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture
dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAwardSoftware,Inc.:bvrASUSP4B533ACPIBIOSRevision1015Beta003:bd08/06/2003:svnSystemManufacturer:pnSystemName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rnP4B533:rvrREV1.xx:cvnChassisManufacture:ct7:cvrChassisVersion:
dmi.product.name: System Name
dmi.product.version: System Version
dmi.sys.vendor: System Manufacturer
system:
 distro: Ubuntu
 codename:   maverick
 architecture:   i686
 kernel: 2.6.35-19-generic


** Tags added: apport-collected

-- 
dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 616394] GdmLog2.txt

2010-08-27 Thread Darik Horn
apport information

** Attachment added: GdmLog2.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/616394/+attachment/1523095/+files/GdmLog2.txt

-- 
dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 616394] Re: dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData

2010-08-27 Thread Darik Horn
This bug is also happening with the nvidia-173 drivers.  (Sorry about
the apport attachments.)

-- 
dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 616394] Lsusb.txt

2010-08-27 Thread Darik Horn
apport information

** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/616394/+attachment/1523097/+files/Lsusb.txt

-- 
dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 616394] Lspci.txt

2010-08-27 Thread Darik Horn
apport information

** Attachment added: Lspci.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/616394/+attachment/1523096/+files/Lspci.txt

-- 
dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 616394] BootDmesg.txt

2010-08-27 Thread Darik Horn
apport information

** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/616394/+attachment/1523092/+files/BootDmesg.txt

-- 
dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 616394] UdevDb.txt

2010-08-27 Thread Darik Horn
apport information

** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/616394/+attachment/1523103/+files/UdevDb.txt

-- 
dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 616394] ProcModules.txt

2010-08-27 Thread Darik Horn
apport information

** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/616394/+attachment/1523101/+files/ProcModules.txt

-- 
dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 616394] ProcCpuinfo.txt

2010-08-27 Thread Darik Horn
apport information

** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/616394/+attachment/1523099/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt

-- 
dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 616394] UdevLog.txt

2010-08-27 Thread Darik Horn
apport information

** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/616394/+attachment/1523104/+files/UdevLog.txt

-- 
dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 616394] GdmLog1.txt

2010-08-27 Thread Darik Horn
apport information

** Attachment added: GdmLog1.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/616394/+attachment/1523094/+files/GdmLog1.txt

-- 
dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 616394] .proc.driver.nvidia.registry.txt

2010-08-27 Thread Darik Horn
apport information

** Attachment added: .proc.driver.nvidia.registry.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/616394/+attachment/1523091/+files/.proc.driver.nvidia.registry.txt

-- 
dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 616394] XorgLog.txt

2010-08-27 Thread Darik Horn
apport information

** Attachment added: XorgLog.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/616394/+attachment/1523106/+files/XorgLog.txt

-- 
dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 616394] XorgConf.txt

2010-08-27 Thread Darik Horn
apport information

** Attachment added: XorgConf.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/616394/+attachment/1523105/+files/XorgConf.txt

-- 
dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 616394] XorgLogOld.txt

2010-08-27 Thread Darik Horn
apport information

** Attachment added: XorgLogOld.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/616394/+attachment/1523107/+files/XorgLogOld.txt

-- 
dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 616394] ProcInterrupts.txt

2010-08-27 Thread Darik Horn
apport information

** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/616394/+attachment/1523100/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt

-- 
dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules/nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: miEmptyData
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 615911] Re: creating a LUKS snapshot hangs the system

2010-08-20 Thread Darik Horn
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 595489 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/595489

Chris, you're correct, this bug is a duplicate of bug 595489.

The kernel security update that was published today includes the fix-
ext4.patch by Phillip Susi, which is a solution for this problem.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 595489
   lvm snapshot causes deadlock in 2.6.35

** Changed in: lvm2 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Released

-- 
creating a LUKS snapshot hangs the system
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615911
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 615911] [NEW] creating a LUKS snapshot hangs the system

2010-08-10 Thread Darik Horn
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: lvm2

LVM cannot create a snapshot of a LUKS encrypted volume.

To reproduce:

  1.  Install Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx to a LUKS root using the alternate 
installer.
  2.  Run:  lvcreate --snapshot /dev/vg00/root --size 2G --name backup --verbose

This hangs the system.  Verbose lvcreate messages are normal.  The last
line printed is:

  Suspending vg00-root (252:1) with filesystem sync with device flush

The console error is:

  [360:540149] INFO: task flush-252:1:486 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
  [360:609736] INFO: task lvcreate:1320 blocked for more than 120 seconds.

These console messages periodically repeat, but lvcreate never returns
and the system becomes unresponsive and requires a hard reset.

The snapshot volume is created and is visible after boot, but it seems
to be corrupt:

  # mount /dev/vg00/backup /mnt
  mount: unknown filesystem type 'DM_snapshot_cow'

** Affects: lvm2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: crash cryptsetup hang luks lvcreate lvm snapshot

-- 
creating a LUKS snapshot hangs the system
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615911
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 615911] Re: creating a LUKS snapshot hangs the system

2010-08-10 Thread Darik Horn

** Attachment added: apt-cache policy
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53430997/apt-cache.policy.txt

-- 
creating a LUKS snapshot hangs the system
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615911
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 615911] Re: creating a LUKS snapshot hangs the system

2010-08-10 Thread Darik Horn
I tested a similar storage configuration on an external disk connected
to the same computer; doing an LVM snapshot inside LUKS behaves
correctly on an external disk.

Thus, this LVM glitch is probably limited to taking a snapshot of a root
filesystem that is in LUKS.

Also note that nothing is being logged into the syslog or dmesg.  The
hang instantly stops all IO to the root filesystem.

-- 
creating a LUKS snapshot hangs the system
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615911
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 26452] Re: netatalk not built with encrypted auth support

2010-07-23 Thread Darik Horn
It looks like somebody wrote the gnutls replacement for netatalk.  Also,
from the changelog:

  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=565969


** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #565969
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=565969

-- 
netatalk not built with encrypted auth support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/26452
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 482597] Re: Empathy dialpad tones don't work

2010-07-15 Thread Darik Horn
I noticed this bug after becoming frustrated with Empathy in Ubuntu
Lucid.  Empathy is indeed doing DMTF through the dial pad properly, so
this is technically not-a-bug, but the user interface is unlike most
other VOIP software:

* Empathy buries the keypad under Sidebar - Audio Input - Dialpad,
whereas most applications show the dialpad by default or have a large
button for it.

* Empathy doesn't echo DMTF, which is unlike regular telephone hardware,
which makes the user think that Empathy is not sending the tone.

-- 
Empathy dialpad tones don't work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482597
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 375148] Re: no more /dev/ttySL0 device node

2010-06-01 Thread Darik Horn
This bug persists into Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid, but it seems to have changed
slightly.

When the slusb module is loaded on my computer, I get these lines in my
dmesg:

  -- ST7554 USB Modem.
  -- usbcore: registered new interface driver ST7554 USB Modem

The /dev/slusb0 device node is created, but it is improperly hooked to
the actual hardware.

If you can get the direct bus address from `lsusb -v` or a similar
program, then you can manually start slmodemd like this:

  $ sudo -i
  # ulimit -l 8192
  # /usr/sbin/slmodemd -d /dev/bus/usb/002/002
  SmartLink Soft Modem: version 2.9.11 Mar 22 2010 23:11:18
  677.757945 SmartLink Soft Modem: version 2.9.11 Mar 22 2010 23:11:18
  677.758157 002: startup modem...
  677.759501 002: update termios...
  symbolic link `/dev/ttySL129' - `/dev/pts/1' created.
  modem `002' created. TTY is `/dev/pts/1'
  677.759650 open file: /var/lib/slmodem/data.002...
  677.764930 main: rt applyed: SCHED_FIFO, pri 99
  677.765158 main: dropped privileges to 127.118
  Use `/dev/ttySL129' as modem device, Ctrl+C for termination.

The /dev/bus/usb/002/002 parameter will be different on your computer.

This works on my computer running the 32-bit i386 build, but 64-bit
amd64 is incompatible on the same computer because the sl-modem-source
package is missing.

-- 
no more /dev/ttySL0 device node
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375148
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 522509] Re: [FFE] tftpd-hpa doesn't start on boot

2010-05-06 Thread Darik Horn
I got this bug with tftpd-hpa after an upgrade to Lucid.   The solution
for me was to add `sleep 10s` to the script stanza in the /etc/init
/tftpd-hpa file.

Running `initctl restart tftpd-hpa` properly starts in.tftpd if it fails
during system startup, so it follows that there could be a race.

Upstart doesn't log anything during the failure.

-- 
[FFE] tftpd-hpa doesn't start on boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522509
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to tftp-hpa in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 522509] Re: [FFE] tftpd-hpa doesn't start on boot

2010-05-06 Thread Darik Horn
BTW, I'm running tftp-hpa 5.0-11ubuntu2, which is current for Lucid.

This bug seems to depend on the order of network interface plumbing, and
probably expresses more frequently if one interface is configured by
DHCP or is otherwise slow.  My guess is that this bug does not express
on computers with one ethernet interface.

Attached is a /etc/init/tftpd-hpa variant that reliably starts in.tftpd
on my computer.  It likely works because the default binding is 0.0.0.0
and the loopback interface is quickly available.

Consider reopening this ticket.

** Attachment added: tftpd-hpa.conf
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47960516/tftpd-hpa.conf

-- 
[FFE] tftpd-hpa doesn't start on boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522509
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to tftp-hpa in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 522509] Re: [FFE] tftpd-hpa doesn't start on boot

2010-05-06 Thread Darik Horn
I got this bug with tftpd-hpa after an upgrade to Lucid.   The solution
for me was to add `sleep 10s` to the script stanza in the /etc/init
/tftpd-hpa file.

Running `initctl restart tftpd-hpa` properly starts in.tftpd if it fails
during system startup, so it follows that there could be a race.

Upstart doesn't log anything during the failure.

-- 
[FFE] tftpd-hpa doesn't start on boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522509
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 522509] Re: [FFE] tftpd-hpa doesn't start on boot

2010-05-06 Thread Darik Horn
BTW, I'm running tftp-hpa 5.0-11ubuntu2, which is current for Lucid.

This bug seems to depend on the order of network interface plumbing, and
probably expresses more frequently if one interface is configured by
DHCP or is otherwise slow.  My guess is that this bug does not express
on computers with one ethernet interface.

Attached is a /etc/init/tftpd-hpa variant that reliably starts in.tftpd
on my computer.  It likely works because the default binding is 0.0.0.0
and the loopback interface is quickly available.

Consider reopening this ticket.

** Attachment added: tftpd-hpa.conf
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47960516/tftpd-hpa.conf

-- 
[FFE] tftpd-hpa doesn't start on boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522509
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 572708] Re: upstart disables hvc0 getty in Lucid 10.04

2010-05-01 Thread Darik Horn
This is not an Ubuntu bug.

I'm running this domU at Linode.  By default, the Linode manager
modifies the Ubuntu system for better Xen compatibility and moves the
hvc0.conf file.

The fix is:

  1. Click the Dashboard.
  2. Click the Profile.
  3. Set Xenify Distro: No in the Helper Options.
  4. Click Save Profile.
  5. Click Reboot.
  
Screenshot attached.

** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

** Attachment added: Disable Xenify Distro in the Linode Profile to get a 
working hvc0 console.
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/46979344/linode-xenify-distro.png

-- 
upstart disables hvc0 getty in Lucid 10.04
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572708
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 572708] [NEW] upstart disables hvc0 getty in Lucid 10.04

2010-04-30 Thread Darik Horn
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: upstart

This upstart configuration file worked in Karmic:

  # hvc0.conf
  start on stopped rc RUNLEVEL=[2345]
  stop on runlevel [!2345]
  respawn
  exec /sbin/getty -8 38400 hvc0

After the upgrade to Lucid, something is silently moving this file to
/etc/event.disabled and not logging the action.

If I move this file back to /etc/init and do `initctl start hvc0`, then
the getty is properly started.  It is only at boot time that the upstart
fails to start the getty.

I tried these variants:

  # hvc0.conf
  start on tty-added
  stop on tty-removed TTY=$TTY
  instance TTY
  exec /sbin/getty -8 38400 $TTY

 # hvc0.conf
  start on stopped rc RUNLEVEL=[2345]
  stop on runlevel [!2345]
  respawn
  exec /sbin/getty -8 38400 hvc0

  # hvc0.conf
  start on (tty-device-added KERNEL=hvc0 and runlevel [23])
  exec /sbin/getty -8 38400 hvc0

In the Xen guest domU environment, these configurations all work for tty
console devices, but not for hvc console devices during system startup.

** Affects: upstart (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
upstart disables hvc0 getty in Lucid 10.04
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572708
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 572708] Re: upstart disables hvc0 getty in Lucid 10.04

2010-04-30 Thread Darik Horn

** Attachment added: messages
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/46777488/messages

-- 
upstart disables hvc0 getty in Lucid 10.04
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572708
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 572708] Re: upstart disables hvc0 getty in Lucid 10.04

2010-04-30 Thread Darik Horn

** Attachment added: syslog
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/46781104/syslog

-- 
upstart disables hvc0 getty in Lucid 10.04
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572708
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 572708] Re: upstart disables hvc0 getty in Lucid 10.04

2010-04-30 Thread Darik Horn

** Attachment added: initctl-list
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/46781115/initctl-list

-- 
upstart disables hvc0 getty in Lucid 10.04
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572708
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 572708] Re: upstart disables hvc0 getty in Lucid 10.04

2010-04-30 Thread Darik Horn
While troubleshooting, I downgraded to linux-image-2.6.31-20-virtual and
upstart-0.6.3-10 from Karmic on both of i386 and amd64, but the problem
persisted.

This makes me think that the glitch is my upstart configuration or udev.
I haven't yet been able to downgrade udev to check because most of the
boot stack seems to be stuck on plymouth.

-- 
upstart disables hvc0 getty in Lucid 10.04
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572708
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 572708] Re: upstart disables hvc0 getty in Lucid 10.04

2010-04-30 Thread Darik Horn
I've discovered the glitch.  This seemingly good file name is actually
bad:

  /etc/init/hvc0.conf

Renaming this specific file to any of these names results in the desired
behavior:

  /etc/init/hvc1.conf
  /etc/init/hvc00.conf
  /etc/init/hvc01.conf
  /etc/init/bork0.conf
  /etc/init/bork00.conf
  /etc/init/xxx0.conf

I've been unable to find another file name that is similarly moved into
the /etc/event.disabled directory by upstart.

This behavior persists after upstart is recompiled, and it seems to
happen regardless of file contents.

Is there a reason why upstart does this?  -- Could be a failsafe to
ensure that a console tty is available?

-- 
upstart disables hvc0 getty in Lucid 10.04
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572708
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


  1   2   >