Re: [Bug 652206] Re: Regression with RaLink RT2860
I may have made a mistake in which package this bug is coming from. I have the backport packages for modules installed, and one of these (linux-backports-modules-compat-wireless-2.6.35-2.6.32-25-generic) is providing the kernel module I have loaded when I boot this kernel. The 2.6.35-24 kernel, which works, does NOT have a backport package installed (though one is available). I am installing the backport for -24 to see if this introduces the observed behaviour into -24, while removing it from -25 (as this downgrades the backport package). -- Regression with RaLink RT2860 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652206 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 652206] Re: Regression with RaLink RT2860
Kernel 2.6.32-24 continues to operate fine, with or without the backport module from 2.6.35. Kernel 2.6.32-25 appears to operate normally provided it is NOT using the backported module from 2.6.35 - but the malfunction does appear when booted into 2.6.32-25 WITH the backport from 2.6.35. To put it another way as that seems worded complicated, the issue only appears to occur in 2.6.32-25 with linux-backports-modules-compat- wireless-2.6.35-2.6.32-25-generic installed. -- Regression with RaLink RT2860 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652206 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 652206] [NEW] Regression with RaLink RT2860
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-image-2.6.32-25-generic My netbook (EeePC 1000) can no longer reliably connect via WiFi when running the kernel included with linux-image-2.6.32-25-generic. The link will come up for a few seconds to a minute, and will drop and attempt to reconnect. Reconnection, if it happens at all, takes a long time. The cycle repeats endlessly. I do not see any unusual activity in the system logs. linux-image-2.6.32-24-generic does not exhibit this problem. Device information via lspci -vv (while booted into -24 kernel) 01:00.0 Network controller: RaLink RT2860 Subsystem: RaLink Device 2790 Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx- Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- INTx- Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 32 bytes Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 19 Region 0: Memory at fbef (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=64K] Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 3 Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=375mA PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold-) Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME+ Capabilities: [50] Message Signalled Interrupts: Mask- 64bit+ Queue=0/5 Enable- Address: Data: Capabilities: [70] Express (v1) Endpoint, MSI 00 DevCap: MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s 128ns, L1 2us ExtTag- AttnBtn- AttnInd- PwrInd- RBE+ FLReset- DevCtl: Report errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- Unsupported- RlxdOrd+ ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop- MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 512 bytes DevSta: CorrErr+ UncorrErr- FatalErr- UnsuppReq+ AuxPwr- TransPend- LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x1, ASPM L0s L1, Latency L0 512ns, L1 64us ClockPM+ Suprise- LLActRep- BwNot- LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 128 bytes Disabled- Retrain- CommClk+ ExtSynch- ClockPM- AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt- LnkSta: Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x1, TrErr- Train- SlotClk+ DLActive- BWMgmt- ABWMgmt- Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error Reporting ? Kernel driver in use: rt2860 Kernel modules: rt2860sta Other information requested by the bug reporting interface is attached. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: kernel ralink rt2860 wireless -- Regression with RaLink RT2860 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652206 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 652206] Re: Regression with RaLink RT2860
** Attachment added: system info https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652206/+attachment/1658253/+files/ralink-bug.tar -- Regression with RaLink RT2860 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652206 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227406] Re: run application dialog autocomplete regression
I see the same behavior on a fresh Lucid netbook install. Glipper is not installed. The behavior also seems present in any standard file selection-style dialog (ie, choosing an icon for a launcher entry, hit CTRL-L to switch from the segmented buttons to text path entry, and begin typing the path). I believe this is upstream gnome behavior as I've experienced this only with gnome, and across multiple distributions that are not Ubuntu derivatives. -- run application dialog autocomplete regression https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227406 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 273558] Re: /usr/lib/libopenal.so.0 missing from Intrepid
Yes, they can. I see no reason why libopenal.so.0 and libopenal.so.1 cannot both exist. Some minor patching may be required for configuration file paths (I believe the libraries both use the same path/files in /etc but have different expectations about the contents of them) directhex, you seem far more familiar with them than I. Are there any reasons why my suggestion is impractical/impossible? -- /usr/lib/libopenal.so.0 missing from Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273558 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 22007] Re: no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
I agree that this is an overly aged and annoying bug, but the rhetoric isn't really necessary. As far as using xscreensaver - sure, it works. But it's nasty looking (gtk 1.x?) and not very well integrated with Gnome. The lock screen reminds me of the '90s! -- no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 504212] [NEW] Server installs improperly install openoffice
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: language-support-en On installing Ubuntu 9.10 server, it seems that Open Office is installed as language-support-en depends on language-support-writing-en, which in turn depends no OpenOffice, myspell etc. This causes all sorts of unnecessary software (such as various X11 libs, a JRE, some GNOME libraries). Having this sort of software installed by default via the ubuntu-server task seems inappropriate? I am able to cull all of this out without any issue, except that it takes a good amount of time to do so, and introduces an unnecessary step in an install process that could introduce user error (ie, accidentally uninstall ubuntu-standard and a whole lot of other essentials) ** Affects: language-support-en (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Server installs improperly install openoffice https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 22007] Re: no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
Chad Bernier wrote: I liked the app solution. I checked it out when I was using Ubuntu. I don't have a linux right now, and I am not sure which I will pick when I put it on again. I don't think this is an issue though. There are more important things to work on. Screen savers haven't been necessary for years, and they are often annoying. Either you set it to a really long timeout, or they pop up in the middle of a TV show. I want the screen either on, or off. Save some electricity and let your monitor go blank, sleep, or off. If you like a certain screen saver that much, you can install the stuff needed to make it work right. Linux is all about messing with things anyways. On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Irios nachodelosr...@gmail.com wrote: Why is it that we *have* to be stuck with the suckiest screensaver selector of any platform? We've got some of the coolest screensavers, but some are really very bad; however, there's no way to make a selection, and all users are stuck with choosing just one, or letting any one pop up at random. All because a square headed upstream maintainer has determined It Is Bad for Us. Who cares about diverging from Gnome upstream in this? Don't we diverge from upstream with the notifier, for example, which is far more important? Let's kick the screen saver selector in the butt! Then we may push it upstream, and everything will be dandy. -- no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. I wonder if a solution would be thus: Leave the screensaver config program alone, but create an additional program that edits a particular .desktop file. A user simply sets their screensaver to this special one, and uses this hypothetical tool to configure the screensaver as they actually like. gnome-screensaver need not know of this at all. -- no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 273558] Re: /usr/lib/libopenal.so.0 missing from Intrepid
I think it's important to note however, that this is NOT an Ubuntu- specific issue. Other distros are making the same migration (and are doing it the same sudden-transition way). While I think that the only reasons to REPLACE one library with the other is few shared files in /etc, I think there is no reason why the old code cannot be patched to look at a different file(s). There's two different ways this can be fixed: 1. Fix it on the distro/packaging side 2. Fix it on the application side I vote that #1 is the proper solution. If libqt was dropped when libqt4 was added, I think there would be a lot more noise... but it's nearly the same problem. We need a graceful transition, not an all-or-nothing approach as is being implemented now. That said, Pre 1.1 openal development has ceased. Applications still being worked on (like x-plane) should notice this and do what they need to do to keep current. I'm not saying anyone is doing this, but lets try to avoid stonewalling. Being inflexible doesn't help anyone. If I could code worth anything, I would have a go at fixing the issue myself. I hope there is someone out there with the skills and motivation. And, taking a probably naive view, I don't see how this is an issue on the application side itself. Unless there are dirty kludges involved, it shouldn't be very hard to find and adjust any calls to a given set of functions. Why is there such resistance to 'porting' the code to the new version? If it really is that hard, then I would say someone is doing something wrong. Take that with some salt, since I likely don't know what I'm talking about. Now... bickering aside. Why is it specifically that the old library cannot be provided side-by-side? It makes no sense to me. Is it the config file conflict in /etc? As mentioned earlier, this (probably) should be something even I can fix. The specification to use that file is stored somewhere. Even MS 'notepad' can do a find/replace. I sincerely hope there's more to this than laziness or stubbornness. -- /usr/lib/libopenal.so.0 missing from Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273558 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 363767] Re: Screen is not locked after suspend
I can confirm this behaviour for both suspend to disk and suspend to RAM. My screensaver is set to lock after 10 minutes, but even after being suspended for 10 hours, it resumes unlocked. This is a big security problem. Can someone take a look at this? This bug has been sitting for almost a month and hasn't been touched. ** Changed in: powerdevil (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Screen is not locked after suspend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363767 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 363767] Re: Screen is not locked after suspend
Bumping to confirmed. If this is improper, please excuse me. This security bug needs attention. -- Screen is not locked after suspend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363767 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 329115] Re: Please package Java Cryptography Extension (JCE) Unlimited Strength Jurisdiction Policy
Please note that those Policy files are for USA users only. Due to export restrictions, Sun cannot permit their use outside of the USA. I would appreciate the option of automating this however. Replacing the files by hand (and watching for further JDE updates that would overwrite them) is annoying. -- Please package Java Cryptography Extension (JCE) Unlimited Strength Jurisdiction Policy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329115 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 352755] [NEW] twisted-words depends on pygtk1.2
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu Intrepid, package python-twisted-words version 8.1.0-2
python-twisted-words requires pygtk1.2, however from what I can tell,
this is not available in Ubuntu.
Trying to run 'im' results in the following traceback:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/im, line 21, in module
im.run()
File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/twisted/words/scripts/im.py, line 13,
in run
from twisted.internet import gtkreactor
File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/twisted/internet/gtkreactor.py, line
23, in module
pygtk.require('1.2')
File /var/lib/python-support/python2.5/pygtk.py, line 85, in require
required version '%s' not found on system % version
AssertionError: required version '1.2' not found on system
** Affects: twisted-words (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
twisted-words depends on pygtk1.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352755
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 339785] [NEW] vlc main window class is empty
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: vlc vlc 0.9.4-1ubuntu3.1 VLC's main window (I haven't tested child windows) has a window class of . This makes it impossible to work with or manipulate the main window using the window class. Specifically, I am unable to add a Maximus blacklist entry for VLC, because of this. From what I've seen, the usual is to set the class to the same as the window title. Attached is the output of xprop regarding this window. ** Affects: vlc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- vlc main window class is empty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339785 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 339785] Re: vlc main window class is empty
** Attachment added: vlc window xprop output http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23624049/vlc.xprop -- vlc main window class is empty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339785 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1] Re: Microsoft has a majority market share
Wow, this bug simply existing, certainly shows a lot of professionalism. I vote this bug be removed. -- Microsoft has a majority market share https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 291694] Re: Emulate3Buttons is enabled by default
This may be related. Should I file this separately? This is on intrepid. It appears that, when multiple mice are configured, Emulate3Buttons is not respected if you set it false - meaning that all my mice behave as if it was true, regardless of my override. Please see my attached xorg.conf - and note that both the internal mouse (Mouse0) and my external (Mouse1) behave as if Emulate3Buttons is true. This xorg.conf is based off of Xorg -configure ** Attachment added: xorg.conf http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22770673/xorg.conf -- Emulate3Buttons is enabled by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291694 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 292411] Re: atl1e.ko missing in initrd, causes kernel panic on thin clients
This also prevents the minimal network-install ISO's from installing on Asus EeePC 1000's. -- atl1e.ko missing in initrd, causes kernel panic on thin clients https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292411 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 319893] [NEW] regenerates initrds for kernels pending removal
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: initramfs-tools While adding/removing kernels through the package management system, update-initrd is called for EACH kernel module package, for both additions and removals. Depending on what is being done, this leads to the initrd's being updated repeatedly. This is especially irritating when removing a kernel - the module packages are uninstalled first, the initrd is regenerated (several times sometimes), and finally the kernel is removed (and the initrd that so much time was spent on... is deleted as well). Is it possible to have this script defer until the end of such processes? Is this even the responsibility of this package? Note that I've seen this behavior on nearly every debian-based distro, so this is probably an upstream change. ** Affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- regenerates initrds for kernels pending removal https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/319893 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 273558] Re: /usr/lib/libopenal.so.0 missing from Intrepid
/usr/lib/libopenal.so.0 coexists perfectly well with /usr/lib/libopenal.so.1 There is no reason to remove this package completely. Simply putting the files there from an earlier Ubuntu version makes applications (that may be impossible to fix, as you well know) happy. While we are at it, lets remove awesfx like Fedora did. That's obsolete as well... nevermind that it's still needed, as libopenal.so.0 still is. -- /usr/lib/libopenal.so.0 missing from Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/273558 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 284036] [NEW] newer upstream versions available
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tilp2 Tilp2 1.01 is several years old. On March 28, 2008, the most recent version (1.11) became available. This package - and the various libti* libraries it depends on - could use some love (and updates). Current source code etc can be found at the applications Sourceforge page: http://sourceforge.net/projects/tilp/ This includes code for tilibs2. ** Affects: tilp2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- newer upstream versions available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284036 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 228148] Re: Conflict between libqt4-dev and libqt4-opengl-dev
After doing this, note that you may lose this file if you remove one of the packages. Reinstalling the one you wish to keep would then restore the file. On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 4:35 am, jespa wrote: I used --force to force to install both packages. There is a file that will be overwritten, but the content of the file is the same in both packages. On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 4:09 AM, Zeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am having the same issue with this package. Is there a fix yet? -- Conflict between libqt4-dev and libqt4-opengl-dev https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228148 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Conflict between libqt4-dev and libqt4-opengl-dev https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228148 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in “qt4-x11” source package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: Now that the 4.4.0 backport is available in Hardy, I get the following error when trying to install libqt4-opengl-dev: E: /var/cache/apt/archives/libqt4-opengl-dev_4.4.0-1ubuntu1~hardy1_amd64.deb: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/pkgconfig/QtOpenGL.pc', which is also in package libqt4-dev -- Conflict between libqt4-dev and libqt4-opengl-dev https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228148 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 66398] Re: Ubuntu volatile?
I've created a blueprint for this, see here: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/volatile-repository -- Ubuntu volatile? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66398 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 66398] Re: Ubuntu volatile?
Guy, I've subscribed you to the blueprint, since it was your report to begin with. I've also linked it back to this bug. -- Ubuntu volatile? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66398 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 268531] Re: Package upgrade removes k3b's extracodecs
I don't think sarcasm belongs on a bug tracker. -- Package upgrade removes k3b's extracodecs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268531 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 268531] Re: Package upgrade removes k3b's extracodecs
Are the backports repositories supported? If so, this dependency should be fixed. Besides, who is to say what regular users will have? Perhaps someone was told, or discovered how, to add the repository? After all, adding that one is quite easy (it's right there in the repo administration applet). Also, define regular user... You see, that's a very tenuous argument to go on. Anyways. I'm confirming that I see this on the amd64 arch as well, I assume the original reporter was i386? -- Package upgrade removes k3b's extracodecs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268531 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 268531] Re: Package upgrade removes k3b's extracodecs
That said, I have no idea how one would fix this, short of abstaining from putting a version number as part of the package name? -- Package upgrade removes k3b's extracodecs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268531 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 258466] Re: Unable to configure Administration menu
My platform is amd64 Output of apt-cache policy alacarte: alacarte: Installed: 0.11.5-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 0.11.5-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 0.11.5-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://mirrors.easynews.com hardy/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status -- Unable to configure Administration menu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258466 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 258466] Re: Unable to configure Administration menu
How do I check to see what alacarte is doing, and then see if anything else is touching those files? -- Unable to configure Administration menu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258466 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 258466] Re: Unable to configure Administration menu
No errors appeared in ~/.xsession-errors. I've since wiped and reinstalled the system - for other reasons. The issue is still present for me. -- Unable to configure Administration menu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258466 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 263356] [NEW] GUI widgets are mangled
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: crossfire-client-gtk2 The UI widgets in crossfire-client-gtk2 are... well, there's just something wrong with the way they are drawing. Screenshots best describe the problem. The only difference between the two is that on the second one, I have grabbed the border and pulled it up (attempting to expand the bottom pane, and shrink the top pane). ** Affects: crossfire-client (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- GUI widgets are mangled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263356 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 263356] Re: GUI widgets are mangled
** Attachment added: crossfire-bug-screenshots.tar http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17190250/crossfire-bug-screenshots.tar -- GUI widgets are mangled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263356 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 258466] [NEW] Unable to configure Administration menu
Public bug reported: In Ubuntu 8.04.1, the Administration menu under System is not configurable. I am attempting this process: 1. Right click Applications on the top-left of the screen, next to the Ubuntu logo 2. Choose Edit Menus 3. Navigate to System - Administration 4. Check/Uncheck anything What happens is, a moment (sometimes as long as a second) after I check/uncheck something on this list, it reverts itself. This for instance means I have to manually run gksu /usr/sbin/gdmsetup should I want to enable remote logins, or other such tweaks. Screenshot of the dialog in question is attached. I do not know what package this would be considered, but I don't think this is the fault of the menu editor itself, rather something wrong with the files it is attempting to alter. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Unable to configure Administration menu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258466 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 258466] Re: Unable to configure Administration menu
** Attachment added: Screenshot-Main Menu.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16862323/Screenshot-Main%20Menu.png -- Unable to configure Administration menu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258466 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 258465] [NEW] Unable to configure Administration menu
Public bug reported: In Ubuntu 8.04.1, the Administration menu under System is not configurable. I am attempting this process: 1. Right click Applications on the top-left of the screen, next to the Ubuntu logo 2. Choose Edit Menus 3. Navigate to System - Administration 4. Check/Uncheck anything What happens is, a moment (sometimes as long as a second) after I check/uncheck something on this list, it reverts itself. This for instance means I have to manually run gksu /usr/sbin/gdmsetup should I want to enable remote logins, or other such tweaks. Screenshot of the dialog in question is attached. I do not know what package this would be considered, but I don't think this is the fault of the menu editor itself, rather something wrong with the files it is attempting to alter. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Assignee: Draeath (draeath) Status: Invalid -- Unable to configure Administration menu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258465 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 258465] Re: Unable to configure Administration menu
** Attachment added: Screenshot-Main Menu.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16862322/Screenshot-Main%20Menu.png -- Unable to configure Administration menu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258465 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 258465] Re: Unable to configure Administration menu
Duplicate, error during submission. See Bug 258466. -- Unable to configure Administration menu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258465 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 258465] Re: Unable to configure Administration menu
(duplicate bug report, see Bug 258466) ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) = Draeath (draeath) Status: New = Invalid -- Unable to configure Administration menu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258465 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 249275] Re: shortcut missing from config applet
Bug is stale, moving to a general report for visibility. ** Changed in: ubuntu Sourcepackagename: libgnomekbd = None -- shortcut missing from config applet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249275 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 249275] Re: shortcut missing from config applet
And I'm an idiot. It's listed as Launch Help Browser and has a keycode assigned to it rather than 'F1' directly... (0x0a I think was the default?) ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) = Draeath (draeath) Status: New = Invalid -- shortcut missing from config applet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249275 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 251367] [NEW] ubuntustudio-screensaver not satisfied by xscreensaver
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubuntustudio-screensaver Wishlist bug: The metapackage 'ubuntustudio-screensaver' requires 'gnome-screensaver', and replacing 'gnome-screensaver' with another screensaver package results in the whole ubuntustudio- metapackage-tree to be removed. Adding an OR qualifier to ubuntustudio-screensaver to allow gnome- screensaver, xscreensaver, or kscreensaver would resolve this issue. All other desktop metapackage trees have this same core flaw, ubuntustudio just happens to be the one that irritated me just now. Users would want to remove gnome-screensaver in favor of xscreensaver (or kscreensaver) due to the lack of configuration that has been marked WONTFIX for several years (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316654) ** Affects: ubuntustudio-screensaver (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- ubuntustudio-screensaver not satisfied by xscreensaver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251367 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 173816] Re: package compiz-fusion-bcop None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/compiz-fusion-bcop.list] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/bcop', which is also in package compiz-
I can confirm that this bug also effects the amd64 arch. I have not tested Intrepid and will not be able to do so (no available writable media) -- package compiz-fusion-bcop None [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/compiz-fusion-bcop.list] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/bcop', which is also in package compiz-bcop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173816 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 250008] Re: UI ghosting artifacts
Partial package details: Package: blender Priority: optional Section: universe/graphics Installed-Size: 19504 Architecture: amd64 Version: 2.45-4ubuntu1 Filename: pool/universe/b/blender/blender_2.45-4ubuntu1_amd64.deb Size: 7524310 MD5sum: c4837920daf58fe46bf32630261acb52 Origin: Ubuntu -- UI ghosting artifacts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250008 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 250008] Re: UI ghosting artifacts
** Attachment added: xorg log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16187014/Xorg.0.log -- UI ghosting artifacts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250008 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 250008] Re: UI ghosting artifacts
** Attachment added: xorg config http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16187012/xorg.conf -- UI ghosting artifacts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250008 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 250008] [NEW] UI ghosting artifacts
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: blender I'm using ubuntu-studio 8.04.1, amd64, with an nvidia card / proprietary drivers. I am NOT using compiz. I do not have vertex buffers enabled in my blender config. While using blender, I occasionally see a one or two pixel wide line of garbage along the border between the 3d-view and the top header. This moves with the header if I drag it down to expose the configuration panel. also, while mousing around the panels, occasionally artifacts display around (rarely over, but sometimes) the various buttons/controls I am focusing on - these artifacts look like there is a panel behind the one I'm using. I cannot recreate either of these on-demand, it seems random. It doesn't appear to effect the scene, or interfere with operation of the program - but it is an ugly graphical glitch. It won't cooperate and allow me to catch it with my printscreen key ready ;) Of note: I don't see any other graphical issues with the program, nor do I have any openGL issues on the rest of the system. (note I've tested this all with and without the AddARGBGLXVisuals xorg.conf option, it has no effect) ** Affects: blender (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- UI ghosting artifacts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250008 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 104319] Re: bad parameters to kdialog
Unable to test, closing for age - this bug is stale at over a year and I'm sure I'm not the only one to have caught it. ** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- bad parameters to kdialog https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104319 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 249642] [NEW] Missing suggested/recommended package
Public bug reported: The k3b program looks for and uses transcode if it is found, I've attached a screenshot of this. The transcode program is available in the package transcode, but the k3b package neither suggests or recommends this package. ** Affects: k3b (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Missing suggested/recommended package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249642 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 249642] Re: Missing suggested/recommended package
** Attachment added: k3b settings dialog http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16144386/Settings%20-%20K3b.png -- Missing suggested/recommended package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249642 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 249275] [NEW] shortcut missing from config applet
Public bug reported: In the keyboard shortcuts config applet, the help function assigned to F1 is not present. This seems inconsistent with the purpose of this applet. Pardon if this is filed against the wrong package... ** Affects: libgnomekbd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- shortcut missing from config applet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249275 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 228148] Re: Conflict between libqt4-dev and libqt4-opengl-dev
This needs to getr fixed. Its an easy fix for the maintainer - not something we can patch. this should have a high severity. -- Conflict between libqt4-dev and libqt4-opengl-dev https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228148 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 228148] Re: Conflict between libqt4-dev and libqt4-opengl-dev
If I knew how to fix it I would - but it's an automated build so I'd rather not put a wrench in the works. But your right... this is a bit long to fix such a bug. -- Conflict between libqt4-dev and libqt4-opengl-dev https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228148 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 228148] Re: Conflict between libqt4-dev and libqt4-opengl-dev
Issue has been corrected in an update, as it is a packaging bug no patches etc. are required. Closing bug... ** Changed in: qt4-x11 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- Conflict between libqt4-dev and libqt4-opengl-dev https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228148 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 228148] Re: Conflict between libqt4-dev and libqt4-opengl-dev
Latest update fixed this on amd64 arch, can anyone confirm on i386? -- Conflict between libqt4-dev and libqt4-opengl-dev https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228148 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Team, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 228148] Re: Conflict between libqt4-dev and libqt4-opengl-dev
Rather than --force-all, what works and is safer is --force-overwrite. -- Conflict between libqt4-dev and libqt4-opengl-dev https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228148 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 228148] Re: Conflict between libqt4-dev and libqt4-opengl-dev
Same error, x86_64 My solution was to force dpkg to overwrite it, but I don't know 100% if there is actually any difference between those files. I will look into that... -- Conflict between libqt4-dev and libqt4-opengl-dev https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228148 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 228148] Re: Conflict between libqt4-dev and libqt4-opengl-dev
The files are 100% the same. Both have an MD5 of 2260f4c6f8867919d3f337684448aa8e on the amd64 arch. Forcing the install will not harm anything, but this package weirdness needs a fix... -- Conflict between libqt4-dev and libqt4-opengl-dev https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228148 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 228429] [NEW] wishlist: handling of duplicate files
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: dpkg I just ran into a package bug where two packages handled the same file, and this prevented the installation of the second package without passing --force-overwrite. The file in question was exactly the same between both packages. It would be nice if there was an intelligent way of handling this situation when both files have the same MD5 hash, as in that case it doesn't matter which package's version goes in, as long as the file persists for the life of BOTH packages. Granted, this is still a bug in the package, not the package manager, but some way of handling this besides mucking with dpkg directly or waiting for an update would be neat (or, prompt for overwrite rather than erroring out? ** Affects: dpkg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- wishlist: handling of duplicate files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 228429] Re: wishlist: handling of duplicate files
Already got one open (well, someone else did, I just added that I had it too on a different arch, and noted the files were the same) (libqt4-dev and libqt4-opengl-dev, i think versions 4.4.0) On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 9:11 PM, Richard Seguin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank you for this report, Would you be willing to create a bug report stating which packages are conflicting? It's a fairly uncommon bug so it's helpful to catch the conflicting packages whenever we can... Thanks in advance, Richard -- wishlist: handling of duplicate files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228429 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- wishlist: handling of duplicate files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 228429] Re: wishlist: handling of duplicate files
Found it, Bug #228148 in qt4-x11 (Ubuntu) -- wishlist: handling of duplicate files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 104319] bad parameters to kdialog
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: eclipse For eclipse, package version 3.2.1-0ubuntu1 for i386: the script /usr/bin/eclipse passes incorrect command lines to kdialog on lines 142-144 Specifically, '--warning' does not apply to kdialog, and kdialog does not use the '=' in the argument. Hence, kdialog will exit with error status and script execution will not continue (and it will look like nothing happened - you only see the error if you run 'eclipse' from a terminal) A workaround is, if $DIALOG is kdialog, remove the --warning parameter entirely, set --text to --sorry, and replace the = on the arguments with a space.. I do not know enough BASH scripting to add ain if/else check to see if $DIALOG is set to /usr/bin/kdialog, but a simple if/else stanza should do the trick. Example: else $DIALOG \ --title Integrated browser support not working \ --sorry This Eclipse build doesn't have support for the integrated browser. [ $? -eq 0 ] || exit 1 fi ** Affects: eclipse (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed ** Tags: eclipse kde kdialog -- bad parameters to kdialog https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104319 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 104319] Re: bad parameters to kdialog
This issue actually occurs several times in the file, each time $DIALOG is called. -- bad parameters to kdialog https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104319 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
