[Bug 2067030] Re: The Package name 'fcitx-hangul' description is written misleadingly, so I think it needs to be fixed.
On Fedora Core, 'fcitx-hangul' description shows correctly. "fcitx- hangul.aarch64 : Hangul Engine for Fcitx". fcitx-hangul repo: https://github.com/fcitx/fcitx-hangul Hangul Wrapper for Fcitx. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067030 Title: The Package name 'fcitx-hangul' description is written misleadingly, so I think it needs to be fixed. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fcitx-hangul/+bug/2067030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067030] Re: The Package name 'fcitx-hangul' description is written misleadingly, so I think it needs to be fixed.
This is fedora core's fcitx-hangul description. ** Attachment added: "This is fedora core's fcitx-hangul description." https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fcitx-hangul/+bug/2067030/+attachment/5782118/+files/fedora_core_dnf_search_fcitx-hangul.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067030 Title: The Package name 'fcitx-hangul' description is written misleadingly, so I think it needs to be fixed. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fcitx-hangul/+bug/2067030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067030] [NEW] The Package name 'fcitx-hangul' description is written misleadingly, so I think it needs to be fixed.
Public bug reported: ello, I'm the one of Korean Linux user & GNOME, LibreOffice Contributor and Korean Translator. I recently bought a Raspberry Pi 5, I installed Raspberry Pi OS based on Debian Linux. I tried to install Korean fonts and IME, I found 'fcitx-hangul' description. Let's search Korean IME for fcitx packages descriptions both 'fcitx-hangul' and 'fcitx5-hangul'. dhsung@raspberrypi:~ $ sudo apt search fcitx5-hangul Sorting... Done Full Text Search... Done fcitx5-hangul/stable 5.0.10-1 arm64 Hangul input method wrapper for fcitx5 dhsung@raspberrypi:~ $ sudo apt search fcitx-hangul Sorting... Done Full Text Search... Done fcitx-hangul/stable 0.3.1-3 arm64 Free Chinese Input Toy of X - hangul module Also, I checked Ubuntu 23.04 VM on Mac M1 dhsung@dhsung:~$ sudo apt search fcitx-hangul Sorting... Done Full Text Search... Done fcitx-hangul/lunar 0.3.1-3 arm64 Free Chinese Input Toy of X - hangul module dhsung@dhsung:~$ sudo apt search fcitx5-hangul Sorting... Done Full Text Search... Done fcitx5-hangul/lunar 5.0.10-1 arm64 Hangul input method wrapper for fcitx5 Unlike 'fcitx5-hangul' package, The package name 'fcitx-hangul' description is written misleadingly, so I think it needs to be fixed. Because 'fcitx-hangul' repository https://github.com/fcitx/fcitx-hangul README description shows "Hangul Wrapper for Fcitx." This may lead to the misconception that hangul is one of Chinese module for fcitx. Just in case, I looked at Fcitx's Japanese module description. Following list is Japanese module for fcitx fcitx-kkc/stable 0.1.4-3+b1 arm64 Fcitx wrapper for libkkc IM engine fcitx-kkc-dev/stable,stable 0.1.4-3 all Fcitx wrapper for libkkc - library development files fcitx-mozc/stable 2.28.4715.102+dfsg-2.2 arm64 Mozc engine for fcitx - Client of the Mozc input method fcitx-mozc-data/stable,stable 2.28.4715.102+dfsg-2.2 all Mozc input method - data files for fcitx fcitx-skk/stable 0.1.4-2 arm64 Japanese SKK input engine for Fcitx Belows are Japanese for fcitx descriptions on Ubuntu 23.04 fcitx-kkc/lunar 0.1.4-3 arm64 Fcitx wrapper for libkkc IM engine fcitx-kkc-dev/lunar 0.1.4-3 all Fcitx wrapper for libkkc - library development files fcitx-mozc/lunar 2.28.4715.102+dfsg-2.2build1 arm64 Mozc engine for fcitx - Client of the Mozc input method fcitx-mozc-data/lunar 2.28.4715.102+dfsg-2.2build1 all Mozc input method - data files for fcitx fcitx-skk/lunar 0.1.4-2 arm64 Japanese SKK input engine for Fcitx Also, 'fcitx-sayura' is Sinhala module for fcitx. fcitx-sayura/stable 0.1.2-2 arm64 Fcitx wrapper for Sayura IM engine Belows are Sinhala for fcitx description on Ubuntu 23.04 fcitx-sayura/lunar 0.1.2-2 arm64 Fcitx wrapper for Sayura IM engine As a result, I would like to change the description of fcitx-hangul from "Free Chinese Input Toy of X - hangul module" to "Hangul Wrapper for Fcitx." like the fcitx-hangul repository's README file https://github.com/fcitx/fcitx-hangul Check it, please. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.04 Package: fcitx-hangul (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.2.0-39.40-generic 6.2.16 Uname: Linux 6.2.0-39-generic aarch64 NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zcommon znvpair zavl icp ApportVersion: 2.26.1-0ubuntu2.1 Architecture: arm64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: KDE Date: Fri May 24 07:30:30 2024 InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-04-26 (394 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 23.04 "Lunar Lobster" - Release arm64 (20230415) SourcePackage: fcitx-hangul UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: fcitx-hangul (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Tags: apport-bug arm64 ** Attachment added: "compare with fcitx-hangul and fcitx5-hangul descroptions on Ubuntu" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067030/+attachment/5782113/+files/fcitx-hangul_and_fcitx5-hangul_Description_ubuntu2304.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067030 Title: The Package name 'fcitx-hangul' description is written misleadingly, so I think it needs to be fixed. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fcitx-hangul/+bug/2067030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1589008] Re: Bluetooth freezing video playback In Ubuntu/Kubuntu 16.04
Im sure screwing around with fine tuning /etc/default/tlp might yield a more clarified cause of issue. however I'm happy to disable tlp completely in the meantime. I might look at this later when I have more time to screw with options. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1589008 Title: Bluetooth freezing video playback In Ubuntu/Kubuntu 16.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1589008/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1589008] Re: Bluetooth freezing video playback In Ubuntu/Kubuntu 16.04
Hi All, No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 17.10 Release:17.10 Codename: artful Spent a few hours trying to resolve the issue; I managed to resolve it by doing the following. ls /etc/ | grep *blue* if bluetooth folder exists then change IdleTimeout on input.conf to value 0 as seen below: # Set idle timeout (in minutes) before the connection will # be disconnect (defaults to 0 for no timeout) IdleTimeout=0 if bluetooth dir does not exist under /etc then execute: apt get install tlp I also disabled TLP (power management) by editing /etc/default/tlp , example of change in file below: # Set to 0 to disable, 1 to enable TLP. TLP_ENABLE=0 I restarted both Network-manager and bluetooth by executing: systemctl restart network-manager bluetooth I of course am under the opinion that running the these two commands resolved the issue: sudo apt get install tlp #installed tlp and editing the tlp conf file under /etc/default/ and turning it off. Let me know what the issue is a result of; it will be interesting to know root cause or how power management might be affecting bluetooth. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1589008 Title: Bluetooth freezing video playback In Ubuntu/Kubuntu 16.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1589008/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1718408] [NEW] Google Login with 2-factor authentication leaves white screen
Public bug reported: With the current version of Ubuntu 17.04 and GNOME Shell 3.24.0 I can not use the online accounts (again!). This time the dialog shows a white screen after login. Google askes on my phone for the access (as expected) but even if I accept it shows just a white screen and nothing like confirm or ok. ** Affects: gnome-online-accounts (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "Screenshot-20170920140011-737x545.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1718408/+attachment/4953472/+files/Screenshot-20170920140011-737x545.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1718408 Title: Google Login with 2-factor authentication leaves white screen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-online-accounts/+bug/1718408/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1703377] [NEW] Gnome online account login prevents paste or autotype
Public bug reported: On entering Login data to an online account such as google. Using keepass as password manager I now can not enter my password via paste nor via autotype. Trying any of them results in an invalid password. Ubuntu 16.10 - GNOME Shell 3.20.4 ** Affects: gnome-online-accounts (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1703377 Title: Gnome online account login prevents paste or autotype To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-online-accounts/+bug/1703377/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1008448] Re: Notification sounds sometimes not working (pulseaudio)
Well the bug was reported 5 years ago. 5 years for a response... sorry but I even do not have the same configuration since then. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1008448 Title: Notification sounds sometimes not working (pulseaudio) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1008448/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1536771] Re: plymouthd crashed with SIGSEGV in script_obj_deref_direct() -> Parser error : Error opening file /lib/plymouth/themes/ubuntu-gnome-logo/ubuntu-gnome-logo.script
I experience the same bug. Had this since a few versions not on different machines. Please finally fix this annoying issue. Or tell us how to get rid of plymouthd. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1536771 Title: plymouthd crashed with SIGSEGV in script_obj_deref_direct() -> Parser error : Error opening file /lib/plymouth/themes/ubuntu-gnome-logo /ubuntu-gnome-logo.script To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-gnome/+bug/1536771/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1148033] Re: GDBus.Error:org.openobex:Error.Failed: Unable to request session
I can confirm this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1148033 Title: GDBus.Error:org.openobex:Error.Failed: Unable to request session To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-bluetooth/+bug/1148033/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930148] Re: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ?
Now when you will have your own display server/compositor, Unity rewritten in Qt/QML, and more control on the display stack in general to make it work... I think now it's the time to push back code snippet that will enable Dodge Windows again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930148 Title: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/930148/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930148] Re: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ?
Bring back the Dodge Windows by default please. :D -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930148 Title: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/930148/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930148] Re: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ?
Yes i see a lot of user using docks lately and having Launcher in "always hide" mode. It kind of beats the purpose what Unity tried to do and in my opinion did until Ubuntu 12.04. It did something no other DE offered but now it just offers launcher moved to the left side of the screen and sometimes with wallpaper combination fugly colors too (yikes). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930148 Title: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/930148/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930148] Re: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ?
After using Ubuntu 12.04 for some time i don't find any real benefit that would be directly connected with removal of Dodge Windows and Unity 3D in Ubuntu 11.10 offered user better experience. I hope at least developers are happy now because they don't have to spend any more time working on the feature? Always hide mode was never a real option and now sure we can look at launcher all the time on the desktop and the fun thing is that if user uses wallpaper of certain color then the whole launcher turns in some fugly color and when user maximizes program window not only the launcher is still there the fugly color is "fun" to watch too, probably the result of the fact now the developers have more time to work on things that matter the most to the users? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930148 Title: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/930148/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 576750] Re: SVN client does not work due to Certificate verification error
I think this is fixed in neon27 version 0.29.6-3 and SVN isn't the only thing affected by this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576750 Title: SVN client does not work due to Certificate verification error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/neon27/+bug/576750/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930148] Re: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ?
@Danillo If script would be implemented in third party "tweak tool" then before that multi screen support should be implemented. Next natural step would be implementing something like this inside Unity. Script is more like "proof of concept" and something that can be tested in real world on how exactly this idea would work. I use the script and i can't imagine i would not be able to use Unity like this anymore and that is why i shared my script for other to use. But i don't think it's optimal solution. -Probably detection of maximized windows could be done differently. -Somebody with experience in Unity/Compiz development could implement something like this to be "bulletproof" in all scenarios not just Single Screen / Multi Workspaces. -Moving the icons on desktop and produced "flickering" is not optimal. Icons should not change position but i can't control that with my script. In past Unity 2D used "strut" but it does not anymore and in Unity 3D it would not work anyway. Icons on the desktop should always stay in "newer hide" mode. -There is one question on how should windows behave when launcher hides/shows. I think they could behave exactly the same as they do in "never hide" mode. User could manually move the window inside launcher area when launcher is hidden but when using "aero snap" and other Compiz windows alignment features they should respect "never hide" mode. This would probably take away a lot of complexity in the code and "flickering" of resized windows too and it makes sense too. If u maximize at least one window then there isn't much sense in "tiling windows" in front of it. But if developers don't have much troubles in implementing different behavior then sure why not. There always is another (tiny) fact. Users actually would like to use this mode and i do believe users want something like this by default. And of course old "Dodge Behavior" would work too. I am willing to help further but ATM i don't have necessary skills to make anything beyond this script. I see the script has got some "media attention" and maybe i can trade "some fame" for "some love" from somebody making this happen inside Unity. Imagine the one that pulls this off well be famous! :D -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930148 Title: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/930148/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930148] Re: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ?
I thought about this again and i think "manual method" could work but basically two thoughts prevailed. -Dodge Windows was unique feature of Unity Shell used by many users and that alone is big enough reason not to remove it. -I use my script to hide the launcher when at least one windows is maximized. If i achieved this in few days time and it is robust and works reliable then there really isn't any excuse this could not be easily implemented and maintained in Unity. This two options are the way to go. In the end i hope you won't "insist" just to "insist" this should not be available by default and common sense will prevail! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930148 Title: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/930148/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 899858] Re: regression in gvfs to connect/browse using obex
"sudo hciconfig hci0 sspmode 0" This was not needed (on fully updated Precise). "gvfs-bin_1.11.4-0ubuntu2+jml1_amd64.deb" I assumed this package was uploaded twice and just used the first one. Installation of packages went without any problems and then i rebooted the PC. I tested all 3 GUI options: -Browse Files on Device ... -Browse files ... -Bluetooth Settings ... -> Devices -> Browse files They all worked the same way and opened up Nautilus with mounted device in root folder of device. I tested: -Copy to Desktop -Drag & Drop to Desktop -Move to Desktop -Copy from Desktop and paste to folder on device -Drag & Drop from Desktop to folder on device -Cut from Desktop and paste to folder on device Everything worked fine and i had to confirm every step on the device. When moving files from Device -> Desktop i was asked to allow deleting file from device after the move was made. Basically everything works fine. Then i tested opening files on the device. Pictures, PDF and text files everything opened normally on Ubuntu. The only exception i found was .odf file. Probably LibreOffice related BUG. Problems i noticed was: 1.) If you want to paste file to device and wait too long "Not authorized" error occurs. I think this is normal behavior but maybe interval should last few seconds longer. 2.) If file on device is of the same name as file on the location it will be sent this will fail and "Another operation in progress" error will occur and nothing i mentioned above will work after that. Solution is to unmount the device in Nautilus and start again. 3.) If opening file directly from device in Gedit this does work but saving the file will fail. This is just something i noticed and it's probably Gedit related. Basically everything works fine and i hope to see this fix in regular updates soon! Fantastic work and thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899858 Title: regression in gvfs to connect/browse using obex To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/899858/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 899858] Re: regression in gvfs to connect/browse using obex
Any chance for either: 1.) Oneiric (32bit) 2.) Precise (64bit) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899858 Title: regression in gvfs to connect/browse using obex To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/899858/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930148] Re: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ?
I am happy with my script it does the job but "i have one KISS solution for the masses" that i thing it could work: On single monitor environments: 1.) "Tap" somewhere on empty space or predefined "spot" on the Launcher puts the Launcher in autohide mode. 2.) "Tap" again and voila it's in never hide mode. Easy stuff isn't it? I know this is done manually but i think it could work good for most scenarios user wants. The only issue i see is should the icons on the desktop move or not. I think they should not or/and i will leave this to debate. On multi monitor environments: 3.) "Per Launcher" setting could be used if Launcher would be used on all displays or fourth option would be used: 4.) One launcher only on primary display with option 1 and 2 available. Main objectives: a.) Unity: A desktop experience designed for efficiency of space and interaction. b.) Unity: Lean Shell and Lean Code for Lean Users Achieved? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930148 Title: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/930148/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689733] Re: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread
"insisting you're right is not an example that's opinion" Yes, but we both are "insisting" aren't we? ;) But i am glad we finally understand each other! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689733 Title: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/689733/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689733] Re: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread
"so basically you want to dictate to those of us who actually use multiple workspaces as an organizational tool, how we use them?" Yes my thought exactly of what you tried to do and I hope you see it now. I just had to turn the table. "I asked you a simple question in an effort to try to understand your point of view how do you use multiple workspaces that is different than having only one?" I gave you a simple answer: "I doubt users don't want a list of all windows of opened application from all workspaces and rather do that manually. Switch between workspaces and play hide & seek." If you can't understand this then fine you can't. "you reply by evading, changing the subject or trying to otherwise prevent more options from being possible for those of us who want them why are you on this bug?" No i gave you simple answer ten times in a row and you just can't comprehend it. And i am here because this new behavior is regression for multi workspace environments. "I'm here hoping to have 12.04 be usable for my needs" And up until 12.04 it was usable for me. Now it's not anymore because i don't see any point in playing hide & seek. Multi workspace environment just don't have any point if the Shell doesn't know anything else than what is going on on single workspace. This new behavior is basically BUG or regression call it what ever you want to call it for multi workspace environment perspective. If you like to think where you have something and don't want the Shell to do that for you fine but please don't make me say this again as i said it ten times already and if you can't understand then i guess you never will. We can agree that we understand that we don't understand each other and that's it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689733 Title: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/689733/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689733] Re: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread
"I'm trying to understand other ways workspaces can be used" I don't, because i do understand what application spread should do in multi workspace environment. It should show windows from all workspaces not hide them. "if you expect to see all windows from all workspaces why would you use more than one WS? that makes no sense" Yes i think you don't understand not everybody wants to: -Think where application windows are opened in multi workspace environment and some still expect application spreed will tell them that and take them there. -Use their PC for predefined number of task that basically never changes and think about how exactly they will group their tasks to rememberer them. It's like saying ti users how should they arrange their desktops and how you don't understand they arrange it differently. Or maybe: "my impression is that you don't have any use for the extra layer of organization that having more than one workspace provides" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689733 Title: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/689733/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689733] Re: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread
"It's like saying ti users how should they arrange their desktops and how you don't understand they arrange it differently." Correction: "It's like saying to the users how should they arrange their desktop icons and how you don't understand that they arrange it differently." It's nothing to understand you see? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689733 Title: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/689733/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689733] Re: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread
"my impression is that you don't have any use for the extra layer of organization that having more than one workspace provides" Well you are wrong. I just don't use PC for limited predefined number of tasks and i don't think often how exactly my task should be placed across different workspaces. I have button for this that i press you know and it does the job for me and doesn't hide things i expect to see from me. That's all. "it appears that ubun is trying to cater to a different set of users than had been the base the real question is how to have a product that pays the bills & grows" I doubt users don't want a list of all windows of opened application from all workspaces and rather do that manually. Switch between workspaces and play hide & seek. That's all. But i said before and i will say again and i think the specification mentioned for future Unity release confirms this. This is basically first step to single screen/single workspace support and does not have much to do with this how you or i use multiple workspaces. In multiple workspace environment list of all windows from all workspaces in application spread is a must and expected behavior. Not hide & seek. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689733 Title: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/689733/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 872044] Re: Bluetooth 'Send files' returns permission denied error
I tested new kernel too and i can confirm this works now. Thanks for fixing this. "But even if you say "yes", nothing will happen on the computer side." Actually "something" does happen. If u open Nautilus you will notice the device is mounted but this does not work and the BUG is reported here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/899858 But i do do agree Nautilus should open when pressing on the button. Average Ubuntu user just does not know he/she has to open Nautilus after pressing the button and just assumes it does not work! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872044 Title: Bluetooth 'Send files' returns permission denied error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-bluetooth/+bug/872044/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689733] Re: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread
"Ego could you describe what you mean by using workspaces more dynamically?" Pressing the button on the launcher and to have all opened instances of the same application summoned in front of me. The way it worked until Ubuntu 12.04. I don't feel the need doing that instead of the Shell and to think where exactly windows are opened and i usually start after each boot with one workspace and based on my needs of that time extend the workspace and by no means i think what the "structure" of tasks on specific workspace should be i rather do something more useful instead and when i want to find the window i expect i will find it by pressing the button and not by having "mind map" printed in front of me on paper or set as wallpaper... That is why the buttons are for. You press them and they give you what you want and not just one piece of what you might want. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689733 Title: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/689733/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689733] Re: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread
I use workspaces way more dynamically. Maybe if i would have PC for one specific group of tasks that would be fixed on different workspaces and would not change... And still i would expect to have application spread across all the workspaces because i would not have to think where is what and why should i? And what was the problem you had? Accidentally pressing on the wrong window? If windows from other workspaces would be at the end and smaller and different color you would probably not have the problem any more? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689733 Title: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/689733/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689733] Re: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread
I see we will get new behavior in the future release: http://design.canonical.com/2012/03/task-switching-in-ubuntu-and-a -introduction-to-the-spread/ I see that workspaces will be disabled by default. Kind of expected yes, but when enabled i found this: "The user want to get hold of the Inkscape document which was previously displayed on their external display. The user double-clicks on the Inkscape icon in the Launcher to show the application spread:" "As there are no Chromium windows on the current workspaces to bring into focus, the Workspace Switcher is invoked, offering the option to either switch to an existing Chromium window, or create a new one:" This is OK but: -If one instance of the application is already opened on current workspace then i guess user will get the result from this "fixed bug"? -If two or more will be opened on current workspace application spread will occur but only for the windows from the current workspace? Too bad I wouldn't mind if application spread would list windows from other workspaces too. Maybe ALT + Tab could be used for current workspace only but application spread could show windows from all workspaces but smaller, different color and below the ones from current workspace. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689733 Title: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/689733/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689733] Re: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread
I think user should not have to think where exactly windows are opened. Shell should do that instead of the user. I use different workspaces: - Sometimes different workspace is used for separate task. -Sometimes i just use different workspaces because i just want to have windows maximized on some of them. Then i would not switch workspace just to open terminal to look at something quickly would i if i would have "terminal group" on other workspace? -Sometimes i have different tasks on different workspaces and for each task group different programs are used but still they could repeat them self across different workspaces but be used for different tasks? Then i would have to do a lot of thinking where something i opened is wouldn't i? - What i am saying is thinking in a way only "one scenario" is used when workspaces are used is not true. There are a lot more scenarios used when workspaces are used. My solution to this problem would be: 1.) Use bias sorting by default for everything (Alt + Tab and Window Spread and inside Alt + Tab groups of the same program too). Everything should be "bias driven". 2.) Use more clear visual distinction of windows on the current workspace and from other workspaces. -Position: Windows from other workspaces would always be at the end. -Size: Windows from other workspaces should be half sized. This would prevent clutter to. -Color: Windows for current workspace would have orange edge and from other workspaces they would be gray. Both bias sorting and color distinction is something already implemented in Unity AFAIK and it does work. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689733 Title: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/689733/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689733] Re: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread
The only thing "fixing" this "bug" changed is broken workflow for users that use more than one workspace and in return users that use only one didn't gain nothing. -User that use only one workplace had the exact same behavior before this was changed. -User that actually use more workspaces has gotten broken workspace workflow. Not all users that use more than one workspace want to think where exactly specific window is open. Why should they if they can click on Launcher or open Alt + Tab and find it fast and easy? The only thing that does make sense is the plan to support "old behavior" in the future and i hope this plan was not changed! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689733 Title: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/689733/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 899858] Re: regression in gvfs to connect/browse using obex
"why do you need that hciconfig call?" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/obexd/+bug/872044 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899858 Title: regression in gvfs to connect/browse using obex To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/899858/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 343363] Re: FFe: gnome functional depends on cryptsetup, but not in package management
Thank you for fixing this bug. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptsetup/+bug/651730 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343363 Title: FFe: gnome functional depends on cryptsetup, but not in package management To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptsetup/+bug/343363/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 651730] Re: nautilus asks for pass even though cryptsetup is not installed - should recommend install before
Cryptsetup is not installed by default and/or there is no visual indicator it is missing. This are the problems user will encounter because of that: -If encrypted USB media is inserted prompt for password will be shown but unlocking will fail. -Disk Utility offers option when formating device to create encrypted volume and if selected formating will fail. -Disk Utility does show encrypted media but an effort to unlock it will fail. -... Suggestion: cryptsetup should be available by default or visual indicator that it's needed but missing and needs to be installed should be presented! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651730 Title: nautilus asks for pass even though cryptsetup is not installed - should recommend install before To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptsetup/+bug/651730/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930148] Re: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ?
It should act as never hide mode and only hide the launcher when at least one window is maximized. If in the future somebody would decide "aero snap" should use launcher area too and windows should resize then great if not OK too but probably there would be some pressure form users to add some complexity? But this decision is something that can still be made in the future if this mode does not get completely removed but until then it would work just as never hide mode does and only hide the launcher when at least one window is maximized. It does not have to have the setting in System Setting if this is a problem. Tools like MyUnity will pick this up quickly and we will find it! And i went trough this bug report and basically i noticed everybody like this mode? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930148 Title: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/930148/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 899858] Re: regression in gvfs to connect/browse using obex
Fantastic. Cant' wait to try it out! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899858 Title: regression in gvfs to connect/browse using obex To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/899858/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930148] Re: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ?
I wanted to see this proposal by my self and test it on my PC and with some help of fellow Ubuntu users i managed to do this: http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=11743771&postcount=6 Properly configured Bash script started at session login (Startup Applications) that detects maximized windows and hides/shows the launcher accordingly. This solution only works on single screen/workspace but it demonstrates this proposal! If i would have enough experience i would probably try to use data from Window manager. Both Metacity and Compiz have support for detecting maximized widows (_NET_WM_STATE, ATOM[])? http://standards.freedesktop.org/wm-spec/wm-spec-1.3.html Will this still be there when migration to Wayland is done? Bit to technical for me yes. Two things i think this implementation should consider: First: Launcher should act the same as Dodge Windows does it should detect maximized windows "per screen/workspace". I don't know how this is done but "per screen/workspace" detection is a must. Second: What happens when launcher hides? 1.) I don't think launcher should Dodge to Windows that are not maximized. It should act exactly the same as never hide mode does and only be hidden when one or more window(s) are maximized. There is nothing hard to understand here for the user it does exactly what it is supposed to to if it does this reliably? 2.) Desktop icons should not jump to the edge. They should stay exactly in the same position from never hide mode. 3.) This one is a bit tricky. What should happen to the windows on the desktop. Should they be moved around on triggering hide/show and should they be "positioned inside launcher area" when launcher is hidden and "aero snap" is used? Maximized application should never minimize inside launcher area. They should always respect never hide mode. For "aero snap" i don't know. If it's trouble then no user should not be able to position open windows with "aero snap" inside launcher area. It should act the same as never hide mode does. And this solution brings another benefit. It was asked in this topic if this will be implemented: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/930148/comments/15 Useful feature isn't it? Suggestion i made this would already be implemented? User would not be bothered with settings. If user wants the whole screen just press maximize button else there is nothing wrong if the launcher is on the screen. True? And please don't say user will get confused if Unity Shell will not be d*mb. It will be "d*mb enough" when he tries it but later on if he choose to use it he will start to like this mode and be bragging to his/her friends about it! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930148 Title: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/930148/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930148] Re: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ?
"I take Ubuntu and Unity very seriously, I devote my life to them." Thank you. "This was one of my favourite features too, but I believe taking it out makes the whole better." Yes, it was one of my favorite features too and removing it in my opinion does not make the whole better. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930148 Title: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/930148/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930148] Re: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ?
Please listen to users. We would not persist so much if we would not believe in this. I agree completely Ubuntu 12.04 has all-new best features and everybody should upgrade to it on release date. Compiz and Unity and Unity Greeter all are better then before, bluetooth will work and it did not in Ubuntu 11.10 it will be LTS release supported for long long time it will do power management much better, mutli-monitor too it will be something it was meant to be when Unity was introduced and much much more. But i just can't agree and find it is a huge step back: -Removing dodge launcher mode (alike) -Changing Compiz scale behavior in a way you have to think where on other workspaces opened windows exist. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930148 Title: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/930148/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 872044] Re: Bluetooth 'Send files' returns permission denied error
I tested suggested kernel and it works here too. -Sending files from Ubuntu to device works. -Sending files from device to Ubuntu works (if Personal file sharing is installed and receive files over bluetooth is enabled). -Browsing the device does not work but that is different bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872044 Title: Bluetooth 'Send files' returns permission denied error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-bluetooth/+bug/872044/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930148] Re: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ?
Maybe just one more thought about new users. -We all were new users of Unity Shell not so long back in time. -Just like Always hide this third option would not have to be default. And yes "winning over" users from other OS-es should be made in a way they fill comfortable and not confused but on the other hand you have to offer them something they don't already have and Dodge Windows is something they don't have right now and we Ubuntu users do/did have. And yes i do agree basically everything important was said! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930148 Title: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/930148/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930148] Re: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ?
If the users are so confused about Dodge Windows alike functionality why do we the users want it so bad? Usually the users that complain the most about Ubuntu are doing it because they will not use Ubuntu and they need excuse and they will still find it. I do agree you can't find feature like this on other OS-es. That is why Unity Shell is better? Shouldn't it be? I don't see nothing wrong with that? How many user usually use "Windows OS + autohide"? Probably less users then the number of Ubuntu users that would like to use Dodge alike functionality in the future too? I don't believe option in system settings that would say "Hide Unity Launcher when at least one windows is maximized" would confuse users because it would do exactly what it is supposed to do. Just like "Always Hide" or "Never Hide" does. All three are easy to understand and are consistent? At least implement something simplified and similar to this mode and leave the setting out of system settings. We will find it! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930148 Title: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/930148/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689733] Re: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/935594 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689733 Title: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/689733/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689733] Re: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread
I tested a bit these new "single workspace" approach. I see two problems: User has to know where open windows are and switch to that workspace/screen. This leads to a lot off unnecessary seek/hide operations and additional burden on the user. User selects Quit in Quicklist and it closes all running instances of application across all workspaces and there is no indication some open instances from this group of application exist because user can't summon them all on working space. The only way to find out is to switch among all available workplaces to find out if there are any opened windows belonging to this group of applications. I must say i really don't understand why this was changed and this new approach can only work well on single screen/workspace setup and is not usable on multi screen/workspace setup but on single screen/workspace it already worked like that without any changes? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689733 Title: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/689733/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 899858] Re: regression in gvfs to connect/browse using obex
I tested this in Ubuntu 11.10 and Ubuntu 12.04 and got the same result. Then based on workaround from this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/obexd/+bug/872044 I tested it again. With disabling SSP the device is shown in Nautilus but browsing does not work but with disabled SSP there is one difference. $ gvfs-mount obex://[B8:F9:34:44:B4:10] Error mounting location: Connection refused This problem is gone but there is another one: Error mounting location: DBus error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Did not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken. Using obexfs and mounting the device enables browsing the device with Nautilus! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899858 Title: regression in gvfs to connect/browse using obex To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/899858/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 933533] [NEW] Inform the user gnome-user-share is needed!
Public bug reported: User pairs the device and can send files to the device or browse the device with press on a button. User then wants to send file to Ubuntu but it can't. There is no information available that user needs to install gnome-user-share package and in Personal File Sharing he must then enable option: -Receive files in Downloads folder over Bluetooth. I think this information should be mentioned in GUI tool! ** Affects: gnome-bluetooth (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933533 Title: Inform the user gnome-user-share is needed! To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-bluetooth/+bug/933533/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 872044] Re: Bluetooth 'Send files' returns permission denied error
Update: I can send files from device to PC if gnome-user-share is installed and configured correctly as described in this bug report. Basically i can confirm disabling SSP enables me to send files to device and i will say it does not prevent browsing the device. Why in Nautilus when i click on device i don't get the content of the device to browse it is probably different bug not related to this one. If SSP is not disabled then both don't work. Maybe i would just make two proposals: 1.) It's a bit problematic gnome-user-share has to be installed and to be set up to enable sending files from device to PC. Could this be improved and integrated in bluetooth control panel? 2.) When user clicks Browse files on device Nautilus could be opened? I am glad i will be able to use my phone and exchange files with it in Precise Pangolin! Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872044 Title: Bluetooth 'Send files' returns permission denied error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-bluetooth/+bug/872044/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 872044] Re: Bluetooth 'Send files' returns permission denied error
I can confirm "sudo hciconfig hci0 sspmode 0" enables sending files to device that does not work by default (permission denied). Sending files from device to PC does not work. Browsing device does not work but the device does show up in Nautilus and the device does respond only when command "sudo hciconfig hci0 sspmode 0" is used. Clicking on device in Nautilus produces error: Error: DBus error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NoReply: Message did not receive a reply (timeout by message bus) Please select another viewer and try again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872044 Title: Bluetooth 'Send files' returns permission denied error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-bluetooth/+bug/872044/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930148] Re: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ?
When users lands on Unity "home page" the first thing he/she reads is: Unity: A desktop experience designed for efficiency of space and interaction. https://launchpad.net/unity Allow mechanism to hide Unity Launcher when at least one Windows is maximized and in all other situations act like never hide mode does or remove the part "for efficiency of space"! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930148 Title: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/930148/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689733] Re: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread
That would be great! Ability to summon all opened instances of the same application in working workspace and to switch between them fast is superb and if this ability won't be lost in Unity Shell and it will stay supported i would really appreciate it. Now if only Dodge Windows alike functionality would not be lost (entirely) and would exist as the third supported option. Unity Launcher being switch on/off if at leas one windows is maximized and in all other situation to act exactly the same as Never hide mode does (simplified approach that enables both "lean code" and "lean Unity Shell too"... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689733 Title: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/689733/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689733] Re: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread
Wasn't this addressed with biass alt-tab sorting setting? I respect different opinions and i usually find arguments are valid on both sides when strong opinions emerge about something. Couldn't biass alt-tab sorting be improved? For example it could be removed and replaced with option Only show windows for current workspace? It is hard to just agree on removal of flagship feature. Past few days two were removed. Dodge Windows and this one. For average user (not just first timer) these loses turns Unity Shell in Shell: -That doesn't use available workspace as good as it could and it did until now. -That doesn't allow fast work flow trough different workspaces and screens like it did. This is why in my opinion strong opinions emerged. Great value, being lost. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689733 Title: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/689733/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689733] Re: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread
Why are you "fixing bugs" that are flagship features lately? Who will benefit from these fix? Ability to summon all opened instances of the same application in working workspace is superb? Why on earth was it consider "as bug" in the first place? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689733 Title: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/689733/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 833595] Re: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGFPE in backlight_get_percentage()
I command "sudo apt-get install gir1.2-gtk-3.0 libgtk-3-0 libgtk-3-0-dbg libwebkitgtk-3.0-0 libwebkitgtk-3.0-0-dbg libwebkitgtk-3.0-common libwebkitgtk-3.0-dev" in terminal. After installed Gtk3, This error has been occurred. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/833595 Title: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGFPE in backlight_get_percentage() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/833595/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 691142] Re: package libvte9 1:0.27.2-0u buntu1~build2 failed to install/upgrade: '/usr/lib/l ibvte9/gnome-pty-helper'의 덮어쓰기 를 시도합니다. 이 파일은 libvte- bin 1:0.27.2-0ubuntu1~build2 패키지에 도 들어있습니다
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/691142 Title: package libvte9 1:0.27.2-0ubuntu1~build2 failed to install/upgrade: '/usr/lib/libvte9/gnome-pty-helper'의 덮어쓰기를 시도합니다. 이 파일은 libvte-bin 1:0.27.2-0ubuntu1~build2 패키지에도 들어있습니다 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 691142] [NEW] package libvte9 1:0.27. 2-0ubuntu1~build2 failed to install/upgrade: '/usr/l ib/libvte9/gnome-pty-helper'의 덮어쓰 기를 시도합니다. 이 파일은 libv te-bin 1:0.27.2-0ubuntu1~build2 패키지 에도 들어있습니다
Public bug reported: After installed gnome 3 stack, this error is found. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: libvte9 1:0.27.2-0ubuntu1~build2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.37-9.22-generic 2.6.37-rc5 Uname: Linux 2.6.37-9-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Dec 17 00:14:33 2010 ErrorMessage: '/usr/lib/libvte9/gnome-pty-helper'의 덮어쓰기를 시도합니다. 이 파일은 libvte-bin 1:0.27.2-0ubuntu1~build2 패키지에도 들어있습니다 SourcePackage: vte Title: package libvte9 1:0.27.2-0ubuntu1~build2 failed to install/upgrade: '/usr/lib/libvte9/gnome-pty-helper'의 덮어쓰기를 시도합니다. 이 파일은 libvte-bin 1:0.27.2-0ubuntu1~build2 패키지에도 들어있습니다 ** Affects: vte (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/691142 Title: package libvte9 1:0.27.2-0ubuntu1~build2 failed to install/upgrade: '/usr/lib/libvte9/gnome-pty-helper'의 덮어쓰기를 시도합니다. 이 파일은 libvte-bin 1:0.27.2-0ubuntu1~build2 패키지에도 들어있습니다 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 688155] Re: package gdm 2.32.0-0ubuntu1 f ailed to install/upgrade: 설치한 post-r emoval 스크립트 하위 프로세스가 오류 1번을 리턴했습니다
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/688155 Title: package gdm 2.32.0-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: 설치한 post-removal 스크립트 하위 프로세스가 오류 1번을 리턴했습니다 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 688155] [NEW] package gdm 2.32.0-0ubunt u1 failed to install/upgrade: 설치한 po st-removal 스크립트 하위 프로세 스가 오류 1번을 리턴했습니다
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm My laptop's ubuntu 11.04 alpha release was upgraded and finish it! So, I reboot my laptop. After rebooting my laptop, booting and loading log in screen. I was loged in my laptop and didn't log in it. I didn't log in my laptop. so I was reinstalled gdm. After reinstalled gdm, Now, I logged in my laptop session. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: gdm 2.32.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.37-8.21-generic 2.6.37-rc4 Uname: Linux 2.6.37-8-generic i686 AptOrdering: ubuntu-desktop: Purge gdm-guest-session: Purge gdm: Purge Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Dec 10 01:58:12 2010 ErrorMessage: 설치한 post-removal 스크립트 하위 프로세스가 오류 1번을 리턴했습니다 SourcePackage: gdm Title: package gdm 2.32.0-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: 설치한 post-removal 스크립트 하위 프로세스가 오류 1번을 리턴했습니다 ** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/688155 Title: package gdm 2.32.0-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: 설치한 post-removal 스크립트 하위 프로세스가 오류 1번을 리턴했습니다 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 680965] Re: package xulrunner-1.9.2 1.9 .2.13+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgr ade: 설치한 post-installation 스크립 트 하위 프로세스가 오류 137번 을 리턴했습니다
-- package xulrunner-1.9.2 1.9.2.13+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: 설치한 post-installation 스크립트 하위 프로세스가 오류 137번을 리턴했습니다 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/680965 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 680965] [NEW] package xulrunner-1.9.2 1 .9.2.13+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu3 failed to install/ upgrade: 설치한 post-installation 스 크립트 하위 프로세스가 오류 13 7번을 리턴했습니다
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xulrunner-1.9.2 Using Ubuntu 11.04 natty alpha release. Yesterday(2010.11.23), I was push upgrade button, My computer downloaded xulrunner-1.9.2 using system upgrading. but, xulrunner don't install in my computer, installing status long time. so, I canceled upgrade, and force install it using apt-get install xulrunner-1.9.2 -f I force installed xulrunner-1.9.2. in my ubuntu 11.04 alpha release. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: xulrunner-1.9.2 1.9.2.13+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.37-5.14-generic 2.6.37-rc2 Uname: Linux 2.6.37-5-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Nov 24 03:20:29 2010 ErrorMessage: 설치한 post-installation 스크립트 하위 프로세스가 오류 137번을 리턴했습니다 SourcePackage: xulrunner-1.9.2 Title: package xulrunner-1.9.2 1.9.2.13+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: 설치한 post-installation 스크립트 하위 프로세스가 오류 137번을 리턴했습니다 ** Affects: xulrunner-1.9.2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 natty -- package xulrunner-1.9.2 1.9.2.13+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: 설치한 post-installation 스크립트 하위 프로세스가 오류 137번을 리턴했습니다 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/680965 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 674929] Re: package ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: ttf-ms corefonts-installer 패키지는 이미 설치되어 설정되어 있습니다
-- package ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: ttf-mscorefonts-installer 패키지는 이미 설치되어 설정되어 있습니다 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/674929 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 674929] [NEW] package ttf-mscorefonts-insta ller 3.2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: tt f-mscorefonts-installer 패키지는 이 미 설치되어 설정되어 있습니다
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: msttcorefonts I think, ttf-mscorefonts-installer already installed Ubuntu 10.10. Maybe ttf-mscorefonts-installer failed to upgrade. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-23.37-generic 2.6.35.7 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-23-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Nov 14 01:27:52 2010 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: ttf-mscorefonts-installer 패키지는 이미 설치되어 설정되어 있습니다 PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: msttcorefonts Title: package ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: ttf-mscorefonts-installer 패키지는 이미 설치되어 설정되어 있습니다 ** Affects: msttcorefonts (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 natty -- package ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: ttf-mscorefonts-installer 패키지는 이미 설치되어 설정되어 있습니다 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/674929 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 356702] Re: tooltips stick when they shouldn't
a its soo nice hahaha thanks jason, it worked amazingly well. can i delete all of the files that were downloaded and the created libwnck directory? -- tooltips stick when they shouldn't https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356702 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 356702] Re: tooltips stick when they shouldn't
could someone please explain how to apply patches? im trying to use the libwnck-notooltip.patch and don't know exactly how to get everything patched and compiled. so, that would be awesome if someone could say how to do this. thanks -- tooltips stick when they shouldn't https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356702 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 450540] Re: [Karmic] All mounted media have a media-player icon
@Chris Coulson do you know when the fix will be uploaded to the repos? -- [Karmic] All mounted media have a media-player icon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450540 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 450112] Re: Entire Hard Drive Marked as ubuntuone-synchronized
@Michał Gołębiowski https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/devicekit-disks/+bug/450540 a bug report has been submitted and a fix is committed for the media player icon on external/internal devices. -- Entire Hard Drive Marked as ubuntuone-synchronized https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450112 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 450112] Re: Entire Hard Drive Marked as ubuntuone-synchronized
@Michał Gołębiowski yes, i am trying to figure out which package is doing this. i will report once i get it pinned down. @Tom Rauthe i have purged all ubuntuone packages, did a reboot, and it DID fix the emblems. maybe try another reboot. if that doesn't work, try to change to another icon theme, then back to the Humanity theme...that might do it. -- Entire Hard Drive Marked as ubuntuone-synchronized https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450112 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 450112] Re: Entire Hard Drive Marked as ubuntuone-synchronized
@Michał Gołębiowski same here: flash drive, external/internal hard drive, cd/dvd, all have iPod icon. i don't think there is a separate bug for this..nothing came up with a search for "ipod icon", "filesystem icon", or "osx icon". switching to a different icon theme takes care of the ubuntuone checkmark emblem, but it does not solve the iPod icon issue...so i think it is a totally separate bug. -- Entire Hard Drive Marked as ubuntuone-synchronized https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450112 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 450112] Re: Entire Hard Drive Marked as ubuntuone-synchronized
I can confirm that the most recent update causes this. There was an update to the human icon theme and after a reboot, the ubuntuone checkmarks appeared. also, it shows up on the other partitions in the HDD (for example, my OSX partition also has all the checkmarks). there are other mess-ups in the icon theme: the CD/DVD Drive icon shows an iPod, along with my OSX partition icon. This sort of makes sense for the OSX filesystem icon, but not with the CD/DVD Drive icon. -- Entire Hard Drive Marked as ubuntuone-synchronized https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450112 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 104432] Re: Glipper makes copy/pasting of images in OpenOffice impossible
This bug is still in jaunty. -- Glipper makes copy/pasting of images in OpenOffice impossible https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 119730] Re: Slow SATA performance
Same problem. Some data:
:~$ cat /etc/issue
Ubuntu 8.04.1 \n \l
:~$ uname -a
Linux netstar 2.6.24-19-generic #1 SMP Wed Jun 18 14:15:37 UTC 2008 x86_64
GNU/Linux
:~$ sudo hdparm -i /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
Model=ST9160821AS , FwRev=3.BHE ,
SerialNo=5MA5P0FB
Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec Fixed DTR>10Mbs RotSpdTol>.5% }
RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=4
BuffType=unknown, BuffSize=8192kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=?16?
CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=312581808
IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:120,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2
UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 *udma5
AdvancedPM=yes: unknown setting WriteCache=enabled
Drive conforms to: Unspecified: ATA/ATAPI-1,2,3,4,5,6,7
* signifies the current active mode
:~$ sudo hdparm -tT /dev/sda
/dev/sda:
Timing cached reads: 1192 MB in 2.00 seconds = 595.79 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 128 MB in 3.04 seconds = 42.13 MB/sec
--
Slow SATA performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119730
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 68792] Re: amule crashes when trying to download kad nodes
I Have the same problem. When amule try to download the kad server list, it crash. ~$ uname -a Linux netstar 2.6.22-14-generic #1 SMP Sun Oct 14 21:45:15 GMT 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux ~$ cat /etc/issue Ubuntu 7.10 \n \l ~$ amule Initialising aMule Checking if there is an instance already running... No other instances are running. Loading temp files from /home/diego/.aMule/Temp. All PartFiles Loaded. ListenSocket: Ok. External connections disabled in config file *** Server UDP socket (TCP+3) at 0.0.0.0:4665 *** TCP socket (TCP) listening on 0.0.0.0:4662 *** Client UDP socket (extended eMule) at 0.0.0.0:4672 Empty dir /home/diego/.aMule/Incoming/ shared HTTP download thread started A fatal error has occurred and aMule has crashed. Please assist us in fixing this problem by posting the backtrace below in our 'aMule Crashes' forum and include as much information as possible regarding the circumstances of this crash. The forum is located here: http://forum.amule.org/board.php?boardid=67 If possible, please try to generate a real backtrace of this crash: http://www.amule.org/wiki/index.php/Backtraces =| BACKTRACE FOLLOWS: |= Current version is: aMule 2.1.3 using wxGTK2 v2.8.4 (Unicoded) Running on: Linux 2.6.22-14-generic x86_64 [2] wxThreadHelperThread::~wxThreadHelperThread() in amule [0x445575] [3] wxFatalSignalHandler in /usr/lib/libwx_baseu-2.8.so.0[0x2b246fc8f64c] [4] ?? in /lib/libpthread.so.0 [0x2b246e523100] [5] wxGIFDecoder::GetFrameSize(unsigned int) const in /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0[0x2b246f5cdfba] [6] wxGIFDecoder::ConvertToImage(unsigned int, wxImage*) const in /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0[0x2b246f5ce01c] [7] wxTextCtrl::wxTextCtrl() in amule [0x5e4056] [8] wxEvtHandler::ProcessEventIfMatches(wxEventTableEntryBase const&, wxEvtHandler*, wxEvent&) in /usr/lib/libwx_baseu-2.8.so.0[0x2b246fc8b66f] [9] wxEventHashTable::HandleEvent(wxEvent&, wxEvtHandler*) in /usr/lib/libwx_baseu-2.8.so.0[0x2b246fc8b80f] [10] wxEvtHandler::ProcessEvent(wxEvent&) in /usr/lib/libwx_baseu-2.8.so.0[0x2b246fc8b959] [11] wxTimerBase::Notify() in /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0[0x2b246f612d76] [12] ?? in /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0 [0x2b246f509a14] [13] ?? in /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 [0x2b2471f2d70b] [14] g_main_context_dispatch in /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0[0x2b2471f2cfd3] [15] ?? in /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 [0x2b2471f302dd] [16] g_main_loop_run in /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0[0x2b2471f305ea] [17] gtk_main in /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0[0x2b247252c883] [18] wxEventLoop::Run() in /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0[0x2b246f50150d] [19] wxAppBase::MainLoop() in /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0[0x2b246f592c8b] [20] wxEntry(int&, wchar_t**) in /usr/lib/libwx_baseu-2.8.so.0[0x2b246fc2a80c] [21] CryptoPP::IteratedHash, 64u, CryptoPP::HashTransformation>::~IteratedHash() in amule [0x4e66a2] [22] __libc_start_main in /lib/libc.so.6[0x2b24706b9b44] [23] CryptoPP::BufferedTransformation::ChannelPut2(std::string const&, unsigned char const*, unsigned long, int, bool) in amule[0x441dc9] Aborted (core dumped) -- amule crashes when trying to download kad nodes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68792 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
RE: [Bug 70473] Re: gaim crashes whithout clear reason/action(msn_session_set_er
Thank you... But I haven't knoweledge for use this report... can you help me? >From: peezawaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Bug 70473 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [Bug 70473] Re: gaim crashes whithout clear >reason/action(msn_session_set_error) >Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 23:12:31 - > >Same here. > >** Attachment added: "crash description" >http://librarian.launchpad.net/6871757/_usr_bin_gaim.1000.crash > >-- >gaim crashes whithout clear reason/action (msn_session_set_error) >https://launchpad.net/bugs/70473 _ Hotmail 1 GB: ancora più spazio per i tuoi messaggi e foto! GRATIS! http://specials.it.msn.com/hotmail.aspx -- gaim crashes whithout clear reason/action (msn_session_set_error) https://launchpad.net/bugs/70473 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
RE: [Bug 92621] Re: Synaptic Crash
Ubuntu 6.10 on a pc but the file I tried to attach seems empty... I have no experience on ubuntu and I can't give you any other info... Thanks a lot anyway >From: Sebastian Heinlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Bug 92621 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [Bug 92621] Re: Synaptic Crash >Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 07:01:04 - > >Hello, > >we need some more information to investigate the problem. what did you >do before it crashed? which version of ubuntu do you use? > >cheers, > >sebastian > >** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu) >Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info > >-- >Synaptic Crash >https://launchpad.net/bugs/92621 _ Windows Live OneCare: tutto per la cura del tuo PC ! Provalo Gratis! http://onecare.live.com/standard/it-it/default.htm -- Synaptic Crash https://launchpad.net/bugs/92621 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92621] Synaptic Crash
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: synaptic uBUNTU TELL ME A MESSAGE THAT SYNAPTIC IS CRASHED AND I DON'T KNOW WHY... tHIS IS MY FIRST EXPERIENCE WITH LINUX ** Affects: synaptic (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Synaptic Crash https://launchpad.net/bugs/92621 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92620] Re: gaim crash
** Attachment added: "Gaim Crash" http://librarian.launchpad.net/6836554/_usr_bin_gaim.1000.crash -- gaim crash https://launchpad.net/bugs/92620 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92620] gaim crash
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gaim a message that Gaim crashed appear to me and a window with a tecnical data is showed but I don't know how to use sorry ** Affects: gaim (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- gaim crash https://launchpad.net/bugs/92620 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
