[Bug 345126] Re: Installer creates too small swap partition (hibernation fails)
Removing hibernate altogether just seems like throwing the baby out with the bathwater, if I may use such a cliché phrase. This bug doesn't seem like something that would take a major re-engineering effort to fix, though to be honest my knowledge of such things is low. My vote, for what its worth, would be to fix the autopartitioner logic unless something else comes up that makes hibernate nonfunctional for the majority of users. -- Installer creates too small swap partition (hibernation fails) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345126 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 476654] Re: CD eject but not unmount when using drive button and CD is in fstab
Your patch for Karmic works wonderfully for me. Thank you very much for all the effort you put into this. -- CD eject but not unmount when using drive button and CD is in fstab https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/476654 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 476654] Re: CD eject but not unmount when using drive button and CD is in fstab
I should also add that like Mr. Tombs above in comment #18 that this bug also fixes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462885 for me. -- CD eject but not unmount when using drive button and CD is in fstab https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/476654 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information
Changing the way users are notified of important information is a noble and worthwhile goal. I agree that a tiny icon can not convey much useful information to the users. On the other hand, notifying users of something with a pop-under window is far from ideal. Applications should not run unless I ask one too. This update was premature without a better way to notify users already in place. The fix then, is to improve the way users are notified by applications or the OS. This will require several things in order to improve on both the old icon notification behavior and the current opening of an unrequested application behavior. 1. It must convey more information than an icon can provide. 2. It must be persistent if need be. 3. It must not open an additional application or otherwise forcibly interrupt a user's work. I see two fixes for this. 1. An application that gathers notifications from other applications. It pops up in the current notification area and lets you know that other applications or the OS wishes to let you know something. When clicked upon it gives a list of current applications with notifications. Clicking then on the application in the list will give you a detailed and verbose message. The computer needs to be rebooted after those last updates. Firefox must be restarted There are 12 new updates available, 3 of which are critical security fixes. etc. The problem with this approach is we again have to convey to the users via an icon that this is something they should click on for more information. This can be worked around perhaps with libnotify popping up briefly and telling a user that they should click on the icon for more information. Eventually a user would be at the computer for one of these and notice it and learn what the icon means. Also, each application would have to be changed to work with this new system. 2. A portion of the desktop be reserved for such notifications. No icons would be able to be dragged into this location and accidentally cover it up for instance. (Say a 'sidebar' location on the right hand side of the screen). In this 'sidebar' would be a list of recent messages from the applications or OS to which the user should be notified. It should have enough room for a basic message Updates available, Please restart computer, etc and a way to click on this new 'sidebar' to have the appropriate application either run or move to the front of the screen and acquire user focus. The problem with this approach is that its completely new to everyone and would possibly take substantial coding effort just to get the framework running and more to convert each application to it. It would also be hidden from users who have a window blocking that portion of their desktop. This at least could again be worked around with a brief libnotify message. If they miss it, they'll certainly see it when they close their last window and are prepared to do something else, or stop using the computer entirely. (or on next boot before working) Both of these solutions would require a not insignificant amount of work but would go a long way to solving the original problem that started this whole mess - That the notification area can't really notify of much. I'd love to see a fix make it in time for Karmic, either one of these or some other better approach. -- [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332945 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 252335] Re: [Packaging Request] Upgrade to PulseAudio 0.9.12 in Intrepid
The suggestion to alter two settings in /etc/pulse/daemon.conf, specifically: default-fragments = 8 default-fragment-size-msec = 5 to fix the sporadic clicking and popping with very short sounds did not work. The way I understand it, in the glitch-free pulseaudio's greater than 0.9.10 these settings among others are changed on the fly. I also did not notice this problem in 0.9.12 which leads me to believe this may be some sort of regression. It may be that some other setting could fix this, but I've not encountered one. If this is indeed the case, the particular setting should probably be set as default if/when it is known. -- [Packaging Request] Upgrade to PulseAudio 0.9.12 in Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252335 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 252335] Re: [Packaging Request] Upgrade to PulseAudio 0.9.12 in Intrepid
Using 0.9.13 from luke's PPA for just over a week now and it seems stable. I've not noticed any crashes of pulseaudio or any crashes of other programs that look like they could be blamed on it. Some notes: Latency is way down in comparison to 0.9.10. Short sounds (for example, pidgin sounds) often have clicks or pops again, like in 0.9.10. This appeared to be fixed in 0.9.11 and 0.9.12. Mixing is working perfectly again. This was broken for me in 0.9.12. Unable to test the network features so I can't comment on them. Overall, I don't see any regressions in 0.9.13 when comparing to 0.9.10. If the clicking/popping issue gets fixed again, this would make linux audio perfect for me. -- [Packaging Request] Upgrade to PulseAudio 0.9.12 in Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252335 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 252335] Re: [Packaging Request] Upgrade to PulseAudio 0.9.12 in Intrepid
I just happened to check and as of about an hour ago it looks like Luke has kindly added 0.9.13 to his PPA for those interested in testing. -- [Packaging Request] Upgrade to PulseAudio 0.9.12 in Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252335 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 275672] [NEW] OpenJDK-6-jre freezes on simple midi app, sun JRE does not
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: openjdk-6-jre
Ubuntu Intrepid Alpha6 8.10 updated as of Sunday, September 28th
OpenJDK version 6b12~pre1-0ubuntu3
When running a simple app that gets a Sequencer object and exits,
OpenJDK will create the object and not exit while sun-java6-jre (version
6-07-4ubuntu2) creates the object and properly exits. The proper
behavior is the one Sun's java exhibits.
Sample program (also attached):
import javax.sound.midi.*;
public class MusicTest1 {
public void play() {
try {
Sequencer sequencer = MidiSystem.getSequencer();
System.out.println(Successfully got a sequencer);
} catch(MidiUnavailableException ex) {
System.out.println(Bummer);
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
MusicTest1 mt = new MusicTest1();
mt.play();
System.out.println(After play);
}
}
** Affects: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
OpenJDK-6-jre freezes on simple midi app, sun JRE does not
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275672
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 275672] Re: OpenJDK-6-jre freezes on simple midi app, sun JRE does not
** Attachment added: MusicTest1.java http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18024541/MusicTest1.java -- OpenJDK-6-jre freezes on simple midi app, sun JRE does not https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275672 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272983] Re: iwl3945 refuses to connect to access point
This appears to be more a problem with my access point after all. Since no one else is reporting this behavior and since I seemed to have fixed it completely by moving to channel 10, I'm going to mark this as invalid. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- iwl3945 refuses to connect to access point https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272983 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 159263] Re: Gnome-screensaver does not stay on
This is indeed still a problem in Intrepid Alpha 6 updated as of September 22, 2008. The uncheck 'Undirect Fullscreen Windows' workaround fixes it though. Thank you for that little bit of information. -- Gnome-screensaver does not stay on https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159263 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 272983] [NEW] iwl3945 refuses to connect to access point
I did manage to connect without rebooting after receiving that second set of errors just now by changing my access point from channel 11 to channel 1 and retrying. Hopefully this was just a screw-up with me and my router and isn't a bug at all. I'll keep this bug updated with the results. -- iwl3945 refuses to connect to access point https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272983 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272983] [NEW] iwl3945 refuses to connect to access point
Public bug reported: Attempting to connect to my access point on intrepid alpha 6 updated fully as of September 21st, 2008 is very hit or miss. In one case, as long as the wireless switch is on, dmesg is spammed with this series of messages multiple times a minute: [ 341.455772] iwl3945: check assoc id 1 | 1 [ 341.455775] iwl3945: check CCK and short slot 2 | 1 [ 341.455778] iwl3945: check CCK auto detect 3 | 1 [ 341.455781] iwl3945: check TGG and auto detect 4 | 1 [ 341.455784] iwl3945: check antenna 5 1 [ 341.455786] iwl3945: Tuning to channel 153 [ 341.455789] iwl3945: Not a valid iwl3945_rxon_assoc_cmd field values [ 341.455792] iwl3945: Invalid RXON configuration. Not committing. [ 341.455899] iwl3945: check assoc id 1 | 1 [ 341.455902] iwl3945: check CCK and short slot 2 | 1 [ 341.455905] iwl3945: check CCK auto detect 3 | 1 [ 341.455907] wlan0: deauthenticated Other times I just get this in dmesg once per connect attempt: [ 279.741452] wlan0: Initial auth_alg=0 [ 279.741452] wlan0: authenticate with AP 00:18:f8:f9:53:ba [ 279.742668] wlan0: RX authentication from 00:18:f8:f9:53:ba (alg=0 transaction=2 status=0) [ 279.742668] wlan0: authenticated [ 279.742668] wlan0: associate with AP 00:18:f8:f9:53:ba [ 279.745180] wlan0: RX ReassocResp from 00:18:f8:f9:53:ba (capab=0x411 status=0 aid=2) [ 279.745188] wlan0: associated [ 288.521340] wlan0: disassociate(reason=3) It seems that if I hit one of these two errors the only thing I can do is to shut down the laptop, wait for a few minutes, and then try again. As of right now, I can only connect about 20 percent of the time. Eventually, even after successfully connecting, I'll lose the connection and start getting one of those two errors in dmesg again. I am not currently having this problem with the intrepid alpha 6 AMD64 live CD run from a USB flash drive, but with the sporadic nature of this bug, I could just be lucky. Other information that may be relevant: Access point is a wrt54gl running tomato firmware. Encryption is WPA personal. Laptop is an HP Pavilion DV2660se Occurs in Intrepid Alpha 6 AMD64 updated as of September 21st 2008. May have started before this. I just started testing Intrepid a few days ago. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- iwl3945 refuses to connect to access point https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272983 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 252335] Re: [Packaging Request] Upgrade to PulseAudio 0.9.12 in Intrepid
The latest packages from Luke's PPA seem to work well for me. They appear to resolve the random latency and crackling issues I had with pulseaudio in hardy. CPU usage remains at about 2 percent while audio plays although running pavucontrol boosts pulseaudio usage to 20 percent without audio playing and 30 percent with. No crackling or crashes noticed though. I am unable to test the more advanced features like network audio or seamless switching between sinks. Since it seems highly unlikely that this will make it into intrepid, perhaps this should eventually become a packaging request for Jaunty? -- [Packaging Request] Upgrade to PulseAudio 0.9.12 in Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252335 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 252335] Re: [Packaging Request] Upgrade to PulseAudio 0.9.12 in Intrepid
Okay, I have to edit my last statement. Suddenly I am now getting
crackling and pops with two audio streams playing at once. In this case
rhythmbox and pidgin playing sound at the same time. Reverting to
Intrepid's current pulseaudio resolved that issue.
The only thing relevant (I think) I changed between working perfectly and the
crackling was editing my asound.conf to read:
pcm.pulse {
type pulse
}
ctl.pulse {
type pulse
}
pcm.!default {
type pulse
}
ctl.!default {
type pulse
}
This was required to get audio working with flashplugin-nonfree.
--
[Packaging Request] Upgrade to PulseAudio 0.9.12 in Intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252335
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 252335] Re: [Packaging Request] Upgrade to PulseAudio 0.9.12 in Intrepid
If 0.9.12 ends up not being stable enough for the majority of users to make it into intrepid as the default, would it be possible to have a 'pulseaudio_0-9-12' package included in the repos that conflicts with/replaces the original files? That way everyone has a mostly stable default, while those 'bleeding edge' types that the newer version works for can easily replace the default. Would this be infeasible or too much work? Or just a plain bad idea period? I don't pretend to know all the details of the packaging system and rules to get stuff in the repositories. -- [Packaging Request] Upgrade to PulseAudio 0.9.12 in Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252335 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 174147] network-manager shuts down connections on upgrade
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: network-manager When network-manager is being upgraded, it shuts down all network connections without warning. There needs to be either a prominent warning that the upgrade action will temporarily disable network connections (with a way to back out), or behavior similar to firefox where the package is updated (without interruption) but the user is warned that he/she must close and reopen the application for the upgrade to take effect. ** Affects: network-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- network-manager shuts down connections on upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174147 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 129774] notification-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 127904 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/127904 Public bug reported: Binary package hint: notification-daemon This seems to happen whenever I go from AC power to battery power on my laptop. It appears to attempt to draw a notification bubble attached to the battery icon but it isn't filled in with any text/color/icons. Shortly after, it crashes. ProblemType: Crash Architecture: amd64 CrashCounter: 1 Date: Wed Aug 1 14:59:34 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/notification-daemon/notification-daemon NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: notification-daemon 0.3.7-1ubuntu3 PackageArchitecture: amd64 ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/notification-daemon/notification-daemon ProcCwd: / ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash Signal: 11 SourcePackage: notification-daemon StacktraceTop: ?? () ?? () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 g_closure_invoke () ?? () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 g_signal_emit_valist () Title: notification-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() Uname: Linux xiptop 2.6.22-9-generic #1 SMP Mon Jul 30 17:26:54 GMT 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy lpadmin netdev plugdev powerdev scanner video ** Affects: notification-daemon (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Status: New ** Tags: apport-crash -- notification-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129774 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 129774] Re: notification-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 127904 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/127904 ** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8654172/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8654173/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8654174/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8654175/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8654176/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: Registers.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8654177/Registers.txt ** Attachment added: Stacktrace.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8654178/Stacktrace.txt ** Attachment added: ThreadStacktrace.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8654179/ThreadStacktrace.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public -- notification-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129774 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 13199] Re: Drag n' Drop directories from File-Roller is somewhat tricky
Drag-and-drop to nautilus still does not work in fully updated Gutsy as of July, 29th 2007. -- Drag n' Drop directories from File-Roller is somewhat tricky https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/13199 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 128340] Firefox segfaults when run (gutsy amd64)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox On a fresh install of Gutsy Tribe 3, firefox will not load. On the terminal it crashes displaying just: Segmentation fault (core dumped) Running firefox in safe mode does the same, after continuing at the safe-mode dialog. Firefox -ProfileManager runs, but running a new profile still causes crashes - as does deleting the whole ~/.mozilla directory. In creating a gdb log as spelled out at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs; I encountered an error with gdb itself saying: /build/buildd/gdb-6.6.dfsg/gdb/linux-nat.c:2389: internal-error: linux_nat_thread_alive: Assertion `is_lwp (ptid)' failed. A problem internal to GDB has been detected, further debugging may prove unreliable. Quit this debugging session? (y or n) after running thread apply all backtrace full in gdb. ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Firefox segfaults when run (gutsy amd64) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128340 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 128340] Re: Firefox segfaults when run (gutsy amd64)
** Attachment added: firefox crash gdb log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8568899/gdb-firefox.log -- Firefox segfaults when run (gutsy amd64) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128340 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 128339] Firefox segfaults when run (gutsy amd64)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox On a fresh install of Gutsy Tribe 3, firefox will not load. On the terminal it crashes displaying just: Segmentation fault (core dumped) Running firefox in safe mode does the same, after continuing at the safe-mode dialog. Firefox -ProfileManager runs, but running a new profile still causes crashes - as does deleting the whole ~/.mozilla directory. In creating a gdb log as spelled out at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs; I encountered an error with gdb itself saying: /build/buildd/gdb-6.6.dfsg/gdb/linux-nat.c:2389: internal-error: linux_nat_thread_alive: Assertion `is_lwp (ptid)' failed. A problem internal to GDB has been detected, further debugging may prove unreliable. Quit this debugging session? (y or n) after running thread apply all backtrace full in gdb. ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Firefox segfaults when run (gutsy amd64) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128339 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 128339] Re: Firefox segfaults when run (gutsy amd64)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 128340 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128340 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 128340 Firefox segfaults when run (gutsy amd64) -- Firefox segfaults when run (gutsy amd64) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128339 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 128340] Re: Firefox segfaults when run (gutsy amd64)
As of a recent update (which did not seem to be in regards to firefox), this is no longer an issue. Firefox now runs normally. -- Firefox segfaults when run (gutsy amd64) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128340 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 128340] Re: Firefox segfaults when run (gutsy amd64)
** Attachment added: backtrace http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8568897/gdb.log -- Firefox segfaults when run (gutsy amd64) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128340 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 71849] Re: files missing in mplayer plugin package for firefox
** Changed in: mplayerplug-in (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed -- files missing in mplayer plugin package for firefox https://launchpad.net/bugs/71849 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 73340] mozilla-mplayer package creates recursive symbolic links
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mozilla-mplayer After installation of the mozilla-mplayer package, /usr/lib/firefox/plugins and /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins look like this: ls -alF /usr/lib/firefox/plugins total 6776 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root4096 2006-11-26 04:50 ./ drwxr-xr-x 5 root root4096 2006-11-26 05:08 ../ -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6904912 2006-11-20 14:35 libflashplayer.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 2006-11-26 04:54 libjavaplugin.so - /etc/alternatives/firefox-javaplugin.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 36 2006-11-26 04:54 libtotem-basic-plugin.so - ../../totem/libtotem-basic-plugin.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 37 2006-11-26 04:54 libtotem-basic-plugin.xpt - ../../totem/libtotem-basic-plugin.xpt lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 38 2006-11-26 04:54 libtotem-complex-plugin.so - ../../totem/libtotem-complex-plugin.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 2006-11-26 04:54 libtotem-complex-plugin.xpt - ../../totem/libtotem-complex-plugin.xpt lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 34 2006-11-26 04:54 libtotem-gmp-plugin.so - ../../totem/libtotem-gmp-plugin.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 35 2006-11-26 04:54 libtotem-gmp-plugin.xpt - ../../totem/libtotem-gmp-plugin.xpt lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 36 2006-11-26 04:54 libtotem-mully-plugin.so - ../../totem/libtotem-mully-plugin.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 37 2006-11-26 04:54 libtotem-mully-plugin.xpt - ../../totem/libtotem-mully-plugin.xpt lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 42 2006-11-26 04:54 libtotem-narrowspace-plugin.so - ../../totem/libtotem-narrowspace-plugin.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 43 2006-11-26 04:54 libtotem-narrowspace-plugin.xpt - ../../totem/libtotem-narrowspace-plugin.xpt -rw-r--r-- 1 root root9044 2006-10-23 08:51 libunixprintplugin.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 43 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in-dvx.so - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in-dvx.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 44 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in-dvx.xpt - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in-dvx.xpt lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 43 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in-gmp.so - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in-gmp.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 44 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in-gmp.xpt - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in-gmp.xpt lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 42 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in-qt.so - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in-qt.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 43 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in-qt.xpt - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in-qt.xpt lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 42 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in-rm.so - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in-rm.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 43 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in-rm.xpt - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in-rm.xpt lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in.so - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 43 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in-wmp.so - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in-wmp.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 44 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in-wmp.xpt - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in-wmp.xpt lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 40 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in.xpt - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in.xpt For some reason, links are being setup recursively and thus causing the package to not work properly. After checking the actual .deb file, it appears to me that the proper files are included. I do not know enough, however, to explain why they aren't being copied to the correct places. ** Affects: mplayerplug-in (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- mozilla-mplayer package creates recursive symbolic links https://launchpad.net/bugs/73340 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 73340] Re: mozilla-mplayer package creates recursive symbolic links
** Description changed: Binary package hint: mozilla-mplayer + + Edgy Eft bug as of November 26, 2006 After installation of the mozilla-mplayer package, /usr/lib/firefox/plugins and /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins look like this: ls -alF /usr/lib/firefox/plugins total 6776 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root4096 2006-11-26 04:50 ./ drwxr-xr-x 5 root root4096 2006-11-26 05:08 ../ -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6904912 2006-11-20 14:35 libflashplayer.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 2006-11-26 04:54 libjavaplugin.so - /etc/alternatives/firefox-javaplugin.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 36 2006-11-26 04:54 libtotem-basic-plugin.so - ../../totem/libtotem-basic-plugin.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 37 2006-11-26 04:54 libtotem-basic-plugin.xpt - ../../totem/libtotem-basic-plugin.xpt lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 38 2006-11-26 04:54 libtotem-complex-plugin.so - ../../totem/libtotem-complex-plugin.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 2006-11-26 04:54 libtotem-complex-plugin.xpt - ../../totem/libtotem-complex-plugin.xpt lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 34 2006-11-26 04:54 libtotem-gmp-plugin.so - ../../totem/libtotem-gmp-plugin.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 35 2006-11-26 04:54 libtotem-gmp-plugin.xpt - ../../totem/libtotem-gmp-plugin.xpt lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 36 2006-11-26 04:54 libtotem-mully-plugin.so - ../../totem/libtotem-mully-plugin.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 37 2006-11-26 04:54 libtotem-mully-plugin.xpt - ../../totem/libtotem-mully-plugin.xpt lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 42 2006-11-26 04:54 libtotem-narrowspace-plugin.so - ../../totem/libtotem-narrowspace-plugin.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 43 2006-11-26 04:54 libtotem-narrowspace-plugin.xpt - ../../totem/libtotem-narrowspace-plugin.xpt -rw-r--r-- 1 root root9044 2006-10-23 08:51 libunixprintplugin.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 43 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in-dvx.so - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in-dvx.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 44 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in-dvx.xpt - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in-dvx.xpt lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 43 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in-gmp.so - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in-gmp.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 44 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in-gmp.xpt - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in-gmp.xpt lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 42 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in-qt.so - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in-qt.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 43 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in-qt.xpt - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in-qt.xpt lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 42 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in-rm.so - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in-rm.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 43 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in-rm.xpt - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in-rm.xpt lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in.so - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 43 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in-wmp.so - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in-wmp.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 44 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in-wmp.xpt - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in-wmp.xpt lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 40 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in.xpt - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in.xpt For some reason, links are being setup recursively and thus causing the package to not work properly. After checking the actual .deb file, it appears to me that the proper files are included. I do not know enough, however, to explain why they aren't being copied to the correct places. + + There are other bugs reported against mplayer (I think) that may be + caused by these recursive links but, embarrassingly, I'm having a + horrible time with launchpad and can not find them again. -- mozilla-mplayer package creates recursive symbolic links https://launchpad.net/bugs/73340 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 73340] Re: mozilla-mplayer package creates bad symbolic links
** Summary changed: - mozilla-mplayer package creates recursive symbolic links + mozilla-mplayer package creates bad symbolic links ** Description changed: Binary package hint: mozilla-mplayer Edgy Eft bug as of November 26, 2006 - After installation of the mozilla-mplayer package, - /usr/lib/firefox/plugins and /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins look like this: + After installation of the mozilla-mplayer package, two links are created + that do not have a valid file attached. - ls -alF /usr/lib/firefox/plugins - total 6776 - drwxr-xr-x 2 root root4096 2006-11-26 04:50 ./ - drwxr-xr-x 5 root root4096 2006-11-26 05:08 ../ - -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6904912 2006-11-20 14:35 libflashplayer.so - lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 2006-11-26 04:54 libjavaplugin.so - /etc/alternatives/firefox-javaplugin.so - lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 36 2006-11-26 04:54 libtotem-basic-plugin.so - ../../totem/libtotem-basic-plugin.so - lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 37 2006-11-26 04:54 libtotem-basic-plugin.xpt - ../../totem/libtotem-basic-plugin.xpt - lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 38 2006-11-26 04:54 libtotem-complex-plugin.so - ../../totem/libtotem-complex-plugin.so - lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 2006-11-26 04:54 libtotem-complex-plugin.xpt - ../../totem/libtotem-complex-plugin.xpt - lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 34 2006-11-26 04:54 libtotem-gmp-plugin.so - ../../totem/libtotem-gmp-plugin.so - lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 35 2006-11-26 04:54 libtotem-gmp-plugin.xpt - ../../totem/libtotem-gmp-plugin.xpt - lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 36 2006-11-26 04:54 libtotem-mully-plugin.so - ../../totem/libtotem-mully-plugin.so - lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 37 2006-11-26 04:54 libtotem-mully-plugin.xpt - ../../totem/libtotem-mully-plugin.xpt - lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 42 2006-11-26 04:54 libtotem-narrowspace-plugin.so - ../../totem/libtotem-narrowspace-plugin.so - lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 43 2006-11-26 04:54 libtotem-narrowspace-plugin.xpt - ../../totem/libtotem-narrowspace-plugin.xpt - -rw-r--r-- 1 root root9044 2006-10-23 08:51 libunixprintplugin.so - lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 43 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in-dvx.so - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in-dvx.so - lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 44 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in-dvx.xpt - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in-dvx.xpt - lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 43 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in-gmp.so - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in-gmp.so - lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 44 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in-gmp.xpt - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in-gmp.xpt - lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 42 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in-qt.so - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in-qt.so - lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 43 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in-qt.xpt - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in-qt.xpt - lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 42 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in-rm.so - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in-rm.so - lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 43 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in-rm.xpt - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in-rm.xpt - lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in.so - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in.so - lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 43 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in-wmp.so - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in-wmp.so - lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 44 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in-wmp.xpt - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in-wmp.xpt - lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 40 2006-11-26 04:54 mplayerplug-in.xpt - ../../firefox/plugins/mplayerplug-in.xpt + These are: + mplayerplug-in-gmp.so - ../../mozilla/plugins/mplayerplug-in-gmp.so + mplayerplug-in-gmp.xpt -../../mozilla/plugins/mplayerplug-in-gmp.xpt + If I'm understanding the functions of the individual files correctly, it + looks like mplayerplug-in-gmp.so/xpt are no longer required as + mplayerplug-in-wmp.so/xpt has equivalent functions. - For some reason, links are being setup recursively and thus causing the package to not work properly. After checking the actual .deb file, it appears to me that the proper files are included. I do not know enough, however, to explain why they aren't being copied to the correct places. - - There are other bugs reported against mplayer (I think) that may be - caused by these recursive links but, embarrassingly, I'm having a - horrible time with launchpad and can not find them again. + If this is the case, then the bug is purely a cosmetic issue. -- mozilla-mplayer package creates bad symbolic links https://launchpad.net/bugs/73340 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
