[Bug 908233] Re: cal -M (start week on Monday) don't work
Yes but both cal -M and ncal -M works perfectly in cygwin (I'm almost sure, I can check this later). So I think this is problem in code, not in manpage. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/908233 Title: cal -M (start week on Monday) don't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bsdmainutils/+bug/908233/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 908233] [NEW] cal -M (start week on Monday) don't work
Public bug reported: man page says: -M Weeks start on Monday. But when I run $ cal -M Usage: cal [general options] [-hjy] [[month] year] cal [general options] [-hj] [-m month] [year] ncal [general options] [-bhJjpwySM] [-s country_code] [[month] year] ncal [general options] [-bhJeoSM] [year] General options: [-NC3] [-A months] [-B months] For debug the highlighting: [-H -mm-dd] [-d -mm] ** Affects: bsdmainutils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/908233 Title: cal -M (start week on Monday) don't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bsdmainutils/+bug/908233/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 883775] Re: non cumulative memory leak in dlopen/dlclose
Thank you, Martin. Suppression seems to be the only feasible solution, because libc6 code is really complicated in this function. Should we report this bug upstream or let it stay here? eglibc (http://www.eglibc.org/issues/) bug-tracker seems to be not very popular. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/883775 Title: non cumulative memory leak in dlopen/dlclose To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/883775/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 883775] [NEW] non cumulative memory leak in dlopen/dlclose
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu 11.10, libc6 2.13-20ubuntu5.
After calling dlopen/dlclose few blocks of memory left unfreed. They
number is not grow when dlopen/dlclose are called several times.
This is not fatal bug, but it makes it harder to find memory leaks in
other parts of program.
Source code:
#include dlfcn.h
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
void print_dlerror()
{
char const* msg = dlerror();
if (msg == NULL)
fprintf(stderr, unknown error at dynamic linking);
else
fprintf(stderr, dynamic linking error: %s, msg);
}
int main()
{
void* asound = dlopen(/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasound.so.2, RTLD_LAZY);
if (asound == NULL)
{
print_dlerror();
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
printf(module is loaded successfully: %p\n, asound);
dlclose(asound);
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}
Valgrind output:
valgrind --leak-check=full --show-reachable=yes -v ./a.out
==2114== HEAP SUMMARY:
==2114== in use at exit: 3,361 bytes in 12 blocks
==2114== total heap usage: 22 allocs, 10 frees, 6,638 bytes allocated
==2114==
==2114== Searching for pointers to 12 not-freed blocks
==2114== Checked 114,056 bytes
==2114==
==2114== 64 bytes in 2 blocks are still reachable in loss record 1 of 6
==2114==at 0x4C28F9F: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==2114==by 0x40141B6: _dl_close_worker (dl-close.c:374)
==2114==by 0x401469D: _dl_close (dl-close.c:754)
==2114==by 0x400E995: _dl_catch_error (dl-error.c:178)
==2114==by 0x4E3052E: _dlerror_run (dlerror.c:164)
==2114==by 0x4E3000E: dlclose (dlclose.c:48)
==2114==by 0x4007AA: main (in /home/ivan/a.out)
==2114==
==2114== 71 bytes in 2 blocks are still reachable in loss record 2 of 6
==2114==at 0x4C28F9F: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==2114==by 0x40085B3: _dl_map_object (dl-load.c:162)
==2114==by 0x400C8A1: openaux (dl-deps.c:65)
==2114==by 0x400E995: _dl_catch_error (dl-error.c:178)
==2114==by 0x400CF65: _dl_map_object_deps (dl-deps.c:247)
==2114==by 0x4012BA6: dl_open_worker (dl-open.c:263)
==2114==by 0x400E995: _dl_catch_error (dl-error.c:178)
==2114==by 0x4013379: _dl_open (dl-open.c:569)
==2114==by 0x4E2FF25: dlopen_doit (dlopen.c:67)
==2114==by 0x400E995: _dl_catch_error (dl-error.c:178)
==2114==by 0x4E3052E: _dlerror_run (dlerror.c:164)
==2114==by 0x4E2FFC0: dlopen@@GLIBC_2.2.5 (dlopen.c:88)
==2114==
==2114== 71 bytes in 2 blocks are still reachable in loss record 3 of 6
==2114==at 0x4C28F9F: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==2114==by 0x400B42C: _dl_new_object (dl-object.c:161)
==2114==by 0x40065B5: _dl_map_object_from_fd (dl-load.c:957)
==2114==by 0x400831C: _dl_map_object (dl-load.c:2250)
==2114==by 0x400C8A1: openaux (dl-deps.c:65)
==2114==by 0x400E995: _dl_catch_error (dl-error.c:178)
==2114==by 0x400CF65: _dl_map_object_deps (dl-deps.c:247)
==2114==by 0x4012BA6: dl_open_worker (dl-open.c:263)
==2114==by 0x400E995: _dl_catch_error (dl-error.c:178)
==2114==by 0x4013379: _dl_open (dl-open.c:569)
==2114==by 0x4E2FF25: dlopen_doit (dlopen.c:67)
==2114==by 0x400E995: _dl_catch_error (dl-error.c:178)
==2114==
==2114== 112 bytes in 2 blocks are still reachable in loss record 4 of 6
==2114==at 0x4C28F9F: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==2114==by 0x400D016: _dl_map_object_deps (dl-deps.c:470)
==2114==by 0x4012BA6: dl_open_worker (dl-open.c:263)
==2114==by 0x400E995: _dl_catch_error (dl-error.c:178)
==2114==by 0x4013379: _dl_open (dl-open.c:569)
==2114==by 0x4E2FF25: dlopen_doit (dlopen.c:67)
==2114==by 0x400E995: _dl_catch_error (dl-error.c:178)
==2114==by 0x4E3052E: _dlerror_run (dlerror.c:164)
==2114==by 0x4E2FFC0: dlopen@@GLIBC_2.2.5 (dlopen.c:88)
==2114==by 0x400771: main (in /home/ivan/a.out)
==2114==
==2114== 696 bytes in 2 blocks are still reachable in loss record 5 of 6
==2114==at 0x4C279F2: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467)
==2114==by 0x4010329: _dl_check_map_versions (dl-version.c:300)
==2114==by 0x4012EC0: dl_open_worker (dl-open.c:269)
==2114==by 0x400E995: _dl_catch_error (dl-error.c:178)
==2114==by 0x4013379: _dl_open (dl-open.c:569)
==2114==by 0x4E2FF25: dlopen_doit (dlopen.c:67)
==2114==by 0x400E995: _dl_catch_error (dl-error.c:178)
==2114==by 0x4E3052E: _dlerror_run (dlerror.c:164)
==2114==by 0x4E2FFC0: dlopen@@GLIBC_2.2.5 (dlopen.c:88)
==2114==by 0x400771: main (in /home/ivan/a.out)
==2114==
==2114== 2,347 bytes in 2 blocks are still reachable in loss record 6 of 6
==2114==at 0x4C279F2: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467)
==2114==by 0x400B1BD: _dl_new_object (dl-object.c:77)
==2114==by 0x40065B5: _dl_map_object_from_fd (dl-load.c:957)
==2114==by 0x400831C: _dl_map_object (dl-load.c:2250)
==2114==by 0x400C8A1: openaux (dl-deps.c:65)
==2114==by 0x400E995: _dl_catch_error (dl-error.c:178)
==2114==by 0x400CF65: _dl_map_object_deps (dl-deps.c:247)
==2114==by
[Bug 710144] Re: Xsession: unable to launch X session --- not found; falling back to default session.
This helps for me: http://forum.kde.org/viewtopic.php?f=66t=91936 1) Set in /etc/kde4/kdm/kdmrc AutoLoginEnable = false 2) reboot 3) select default session as kde At login you'll get the following message: Your saved Gnome session isn't valid anymore. Please, choose a new one or the default one will be used -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/710144 Title: Xsession: unable to launch X session --- not found; falling back to default session. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579005] Re: misleading russian translation
Спасибо всем кто откликнулся. Строчка по которую я говорю является фильтром пакетов. Название фильтра пакетов отвечает на вопрос какие? Какие? Все Какие? Обновляемые Какие? Пакеты с поддержкой Debconf Какие? Поддерживаемые сообществом Какие? С ошибками Ясно что это очень плохо согласуется с Какие? Нет рекомендованных пакетов Поэтому я предлагал переименовать этот пункт меню в Отсутствующие рекомендуемые. Надо или не надо писать слово пакеты я не знаю, но в англоязычной версии слово пакеты не пишется. ** Attachment added: synaptic-translation.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48342278/synaptic-translation.png -- misleading russian translation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579005 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579005] Re: misleading russian translation
Artem Karimov: Fix committed in Lucid translation branch. Спасибо огромное! Sergey Shnatsel Davidoff: Какие? Без рекомендуемых пакетов Какие? Без рекомендаций Нет, там не в смысле, что у пакетов нет рекомендаций, а в смысле, что пакеты рекомендуются, но не установлены. -- misleading russian translation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579005 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579005] [NEW] misleading russian translation
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: synaptic In the lastest version of Synaptic in Ubuntu 10.04 string missing recommends has misleading translation Нет рекомендованых пакетов. I suggest to replace it with Отсутствующие рекомендуемые. It is more clearly. Note that the word пакеты is omitted in all other items of this list. In any case the word рекомендованых is misspelled and should be written as рекомендованных. Also I can help with russian translation. I wanted to create the patch against .po file. I checked out several branches from https://code.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synaptic from sections Lucid and Maverick. But none of po/ru.po files in this branches correspond with synaptic.mo installed in my system (Ubuntu 10.04 latest update). If I will be told which branch I should pull, and which .po file I should translate, I will create a patch and send it wherever you want (not only with synaptic, but with any other package). ** Affects: synaptic (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- misleading russian translation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579005 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
