[Bug 2062011] Re: Please update libjxl to newest version in 24.04 to address security vulnerabilities
** Also affects: jpeg-xl (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: jpeg-xl (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: jpeg-xl (Ubuntu Noble) Status: Triaged => New ** Changed in: jpeg-xl (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062011 Title: Please update libjxl to newest version in 24.04 to address security vulnerabilities To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jpeg-xl/+bug/2062011/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063333] Re: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process
** Changed in: gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206 Title: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-desktop/+bug/206/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063333] Re: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process
** Tags removed: block-proposed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206 Title: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-desktop/+bug/206/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066306] [NEW] CVE-2024-5148: limit session handover to appropriate user
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: There is a new gnome-remote-desktop release in the stable 46.x branch. I suggest that we simply update Ubuntu 24.04 LTS from 46.1 to 46.2 since there are other hardening improvements in the release. Other Ubuntu releases were not affected by the specific issue that was assigned the CVE since it is unique to the new "Remote Login" feature introduced in gnome-remote-desktop 46. Other Info -- There is a significant existing regression in systems that were upgraded to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS but as of today we haven't finished the fix: LP: #206 (This issue has nothing to do with the security fix or with gnome-remote-desktop 46.2.) That fix might need to be handled with a regular SRU later. ** Affects: gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Fix Committed ** Affects: gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: noble ** Also affects: gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066306 Title: CVE-2024-5148: limit session handover to appropriate user To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-desktop/+bug/2066306/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061754] Re: nullboot 0.5.1
There was no comment on why the block-proposed tag was added. It looked like it was added only to keep the package from reaching Noble. It is also early in the Oracular cycle. Sorry if this caused extra work and headache. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061754 Title: nullboot 0.5.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nullboot/+bug/2061754/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058478] Re: Please merge libevent 2.1.12-stable-8.1 from Debian unstable
This bug was fixed in the package libevent - 2.1.12-stable-10 --- libevent (2.1.12-stable-10) unstable; urgency=medium * d/symbols: Remove event_strlcpy_ symbol, now provided by glibc 2.38 (Closes: #1071323, #1055290) * d/copyright: Update copyright year * d/control: upgrade standards version to 4.7.0 -- Nicolas Mora Fri, 17 May 2024 19:19:31 -0400 ** Changed in: libevent (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058478 Title: Please merge libevent 2.1.12-stable-8.1 from Debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libevent/+bug/2058478/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064438] Re: Merge pam-p11 from Debian unstable for oracular
It looks like the Ubuntu diff was incorporated into upstream 0.6.0 so I synced the package: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam-p11/0.6.0-1 ** Changed in: pam-p11 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064438 Title: Merge pam-p11 from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam-p11/+bug/2064438/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058401] Re: Enable automated tests
I worked around the exported symbols issue by doing the build twice. ** Changed in: freerdp3 (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: freerdp3 (Ubuntu) Assignee: Nathan Teodosio (nteodosio) => (unassigned) ** Also affects: freerdp3 (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: freerdp3 (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: freerdp3 (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058401 Title: Enable automated tests To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freerdp3/+bug/2058401/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066269] Re: [MIR] sysprof
** Description changed: [Availability] The package sysprof is already in Ubuntu universe. The package sysprof build for the architectures it is designed to work on. It currently builds and works for all Ubuntu architectures. Link to package https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysprof [Rationale] - The package sysprof is required in Ubuntu main - The package sysprof will not generally be useful for a large part of our user base, but is important/helpful still because it is part of an Ubuntu initiative to focus on performance engineering, both for Ubuntu itself and for developers who build their projects on top of Ubuntu. The size of the sysprof app is fairly small and we envision sysprof as the latest of the small utilities that are included in a default Ubuntu desktop. (Disk Usage Analyzer [baobab] is another one of these utilities.) + Related to https://ubuntu.com/blog/ubuntu-performance-engineering-with-frame-pointers-by-default - There is no other/better way to solve this that is already in main or should go universe->main instead of this. - The package sysprof is required in Ubuntu main no later than August 15 due to a Ubuntu Desktop goal of including sysprof in the default 24.10 install. - The binary package sysprof needs to be in main to achieve the goal of providing a GUI performance profiling tool (command-line tools were included by default in Ubuntu 24.04 LTS, but the Desktop Team and others did not have the capacity to also handle getting sysprof into the default install then.) [Security] - No CVEs/security issues in this software in the past + https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/sysprof + https://ubuntu.com/security/cves?package=sysprof - no `suid` or `sgid` binaries - no executables in `/sbin` and `/usr/sbin` - Package does install services, timers or recurring jobs + /usr/lib/systemd/system/sysprof3.service + /usr/libexec/sysprofd + /usr/share/dbus-1/system-services/org.gnome.Sysprof3.service - Security has been kept in mind and common isolation/risk-mitigation patterns are in place utilizing the following features: + App uses /usr/share/polkit-1/actions/org.gnome.sysprof3.policy to gain the elevated permissions it needs to use ptracing in the Linux kernel. - Package does not open privileged ports (ports < 1024). - Package does not expose any external endpoints - Package makes use of ptracing in the Linux kernel because it is required for the system-wide profiling feature that is essential to this app. I recommend Security Team review. [Quality assurance - function/usage] - The package works well right after install [Quality assurance - maintenance] - The package is maintained well in Debian/Ubuntu/Upstream and does not have too many, long-term & critical, open bugs - Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysprof/ - Debian https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=sysprof - Upstream https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/sysprof/-/issues - The package does not deal with exotic hardware we cannot support [Quality assurance - testing] - The package runs a test suite on build time, if it fails it makes the build fail, link to build log https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysprof/46.0-1build1 RULE: - The package should, but is not required to, also contain RULE: non-trivial autopkgtest(s). TODO-A: - The package runs an autopkgtest, and is currently passing on TODO-A: this TBD list of architectures, link to test logs TBD TODO-B: - The package does not run an autopkgtest because TBD RULE: - existing but failing tests that shall be handled as "ok to fail" RULE: need to be explained along the test logs below TODO-A: - The package does have not failing autopkgtests right now TODO-B: - The package does have failing autopkgtests tests right now, but since TODO-B: they always failed they are handled as "ignored failure", this is TODO-B: ok because TBD RULE: - If no build tests nor autopkgtests are included, and/or if the package RULE: requires specific hardware to perform testing, the subscribed team RULE: must provide a written test plan in a comment to the MIR bug, and RULE: commit to running that test either at each upload of the package or RULE: at least once each release cycle. In the comment to the MIR bug, RULE: please link to the codebase of these tests (scripts or doc of manual RULE: steps) and attach a full log of these test runs. This is meant to RULE: assess their validity (e.g. not just superficial). RULE: If possible such things should stay in universe. Sometimes that is RULE: impossible due to the way how features/plugins/dependencies work RULE: but if you are going to ask for promotion of something untestable RULE: please outline why it couldn't provide its value (e.g. by splitting RULE: binaries) to users from universe. RULE: This is a
[Bug 2066262] Re: [MIR] libdex
** Changed in: libdex (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Jeremy Bícha (jbicha) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066262 Title: [MIR] libdex To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdex/+bug/2066262/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066269] Re: [MIR] sysprof
ions/org.gnome.Sysprof.desktop [Dependencies] - There are further runtime dependencies that are not yet in main + MIR for libdex is at LP: #2066262 + + MIR for panel is at LP: #2066272 [Standards compliance] - This package correctly follows FHS and Debian Policy [Maintenance/Owner] - The owning team will be Ubuntu Desktop (~desktop-packages) and I have their acknowledgement for that commitment - The future owning team is not yet subscribed, but will subscribe to the package before promotion - This does not use static builds - This does not use vendored code - This package is not rust based - The package has been built in the archive more recently than the last test rebuild [Background information] - The Package description explains the package well - Upstream Name is sysprof - Link to upstream project https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/sysprof ** Changed in: sysprof (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Jeremy Bícha (jbicha) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066269 Title: [MIR] sysprof To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysprof/+bug/2066269/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066272] [NEW] [MIR] libpanel
Public bug reported: TODO ** Affects: libpanel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Jeremy Bícha (jbicha) Status: Incomplete ** Tags: oracular ** Changed in: libpanel (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Jeremy Bícha (jbicha) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066272 Title: [MIR] libpanel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpanel/+bug/2066272/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066269] [NEW] [MIR] sysprof
Public bug reported: [Availability] The package sysprof is already in Ubuntu universe. The package sysprof build for the architectures it is designed to work on. It currently builds and works for all Ubuntu architectures. Link to package https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysprof [Rationale] - The package sysprof is required in Ubuntu main - The package sysprof will not generally be useful for a large part of our user base, but is important/helpful still because it is part of an Ubuntu initiative to focus on performance engineering, both for Ubuntu itself and for developers who build their projects on top of Ubuntu. The size of the sysprof app is fairly small and we envision sysprof as the latest of the small utilities that are included in a default Ubuntu desktop. (Disk Usage Analyzer [baobab] is another one of these utilities.) + Related to https://ubuntu.com/blog/ubuntu-performance-engineering-with-frame-pointers-by-default - There is no other/better way to solve this that is already in main or should go universe->main instead of this. - The package sysprof is required in Ubuntu main no later than August 15 due to a Ubuntu Desktop goal of including sysprof in the default 24.10 install. - The binary package sysprof needs to be in main to achieve the goal of providing a GUI performance profiling tool (command-line tools were included by default in Ubuntu 24.04 LTS, but the Desktop Team and others did not have the capacity to also handle getting sysprof into the default install then.) [Security] - No CVEs/security issues in this software in the past + https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/sysprof + https://ubuntu.com/security/cves?package=sysprof - no `suid` or `sgid` binaries - no executables in `/sbin` and `/usr/sbin` - Package does install services, timers or recurring jobs + /usr/lib/systemd/system/sysprof3.service + /usr/libexec/sysprofd + /usr/share/dbus-1/system-services/org.gnome.Sysprof3.service - Security has been kept in mind and common isolation/risk-mitigation patterns are in place utilizing the following features: + App uses /usr/share/polkit-1/actions/org.gnome.sysprof3.policy to gain the elevated permissions it needs to use ptracing in the Linux kernel. - Package does not open privileged ports (ports < 1024). - Package does not expose any external endpoints - Package makes use of ptracing in the Linux kernel because it is required for the system-wide profiling feature that is essential to this app. I recommend Security Team review. [Quality assurance - function/usage] - The package works well right after install [Quality assurance - maintenance] - The package is maintained well in Debian/Ubuntu/Upstream and does not have too many, long-term & critical, open bugs - Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysprof/ - Debian https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=sysprof - Upstream https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/sysprof/-/issues - The package does not deal with exotic hardware we cannot support [Quality assurance - testing] - The package runs a test suite on build time, if it fails it makes the build fail, link to build log https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysprof/46.0-1build1 RULE: - The package should, but is not required to, also contain RULE: non-trivial autopkgtest(s). TODO-A: - The package runs an autopkgtest, and is currently passing on TODO-A: this TBD list of architectures, link to test logs TBD TODO-B: - The package does not run an autopkgtest because TBD RULE: - existing but failing tests that shall be handled as "ok to fail" RULE: need to be explained along the test logs below TODO-A: - The package does have not failing autopkgtests right now TODO-B: - The package does have failing autopkgtests tests right now, but since TODO-B: they always failed they are handled as "ignored failure", this is TODO-B: ok because TBD RULE: - If no build tests nor autopkgtests are included, and/or if the package RULE: requires specific hardware to perform testing, the subscribed team RULE: must provide a written test plan in a comment to the MIR bug, and RULE: commit to running that test either at each upload of the package or RULE: at least once each release cycle. In the comment to the MIR bug, RULE: please link to the codebase of these tests (scripts or doc of manual RULE: steps) and attach a full log of these test runs. This is meant to RULE: assess their validity (e.g. not just superficial). RULE: If possible such things should stay in universe. Sometimes that is RULE: impossible due to the way how features/plugins/dependencies work RULE: but if you are going to ask for promotion of something untestable RULE: please outline why it couldn't provide its value (e.g. by splitting RULE: binaries) to users from universe. RULE: This is a balance that is hard to strike well, the request is that all RULE: options have been exploited before giving up. Look for more details RULE: and
[Bug 2066262] [NEW] [MIR] libdex
Public bug reported: [Availability] The package libdex is already in Ubuntu universe. The package libdex build for the architectures it is designed to work on. It currently builds and works for all Ubuntu architectures. Link to package https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdex [Rationale] - The package libdex is required in Ubuntu main because it is a runtime dependency of sysprof (MIR LP: #) - There is no other/better way to solve this that is already in main or should go universe->main instead of this. - The package libdex is required in Ubuntu main no later than August 15 due to a Ubuntu Desktop goal of including sysprof in the default 24.10 install [Security] - No CVEs/security issues in this software in the past + Note that CVE-2016-3758 is about a vulnerability in Android's libdex which is a completely different project with no shared history or functionality. GNOME libdex was not created until 2022. + https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/libdex + https://ubuntu.com/security/cves?package=libdex - no `suid` or `sgid` binaries - no executables in `/sbin` and `/usr/sbin` - Package does not install services, timers or recurring jobs TODO: - Security has been kept in mind and common isolation/risk-mitigation TODO: patterns are in place utilizing the following features: TODO: TBD (add details and links/examples about things like dropping TODO: permissions, using temporary environments, restricted users/groups, TODO: seccomp, systemd isolation features, apparmor, ...) - Package does not open privileged ports (ports < 1024). - Package does not expose any external endpoints - Package does not contain extensions to security-sensitive software (filters, scanners, plugins, UI skins, ...) - TODO: I noticed that libdex uses liburing which uses the Linux kernel io_uring interface. Wikipedia points out that io_uring is a frequent source of bugs in the Linux kernel. I don't know if this matters for apps using liburing, but I think the Security Team should have a look. libdex does have a build-time option to disable liburing in cases where it is unavailable (for instance it's disabled on i386 since Ubuntu currently doesn't build liburing on i386). [Quality assurance - function/usage] - The package works well right after install [Quality assurance - maintenance] - The package is maintained well in Debian/Ubuntu/Upstream and does not have too many, long-term & critical, open bugs - Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdex/ - Debian https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=libdex - Upstream https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libdex/-/issues - The package does not deal with exotic hardware we cannot support [Quality assurance - testing] - The package runs a test suite on build time, if it fails it makes the build fail, link to build log https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdex/0.6.0-1build1 RULE: - The package should, but is not required to, also contain RULE: non-trivial autopkgtest(s). TODO-A: - The package runs an autopkgtest, and is currently passing on TODO-A: this TBD list of architectures, link to test logs TBD TODO-B: - The package does not run an autopkgtest because TBD RULE: - existing but failing tests that shall be handled as "ok to fail" RULE: need to be explained along the test logs below TODO-A: - The package does have not failing autopkgtests right now TODO-B: - The package does have failing autopkgtests tests right now, but since TODO-B: they always failed they are handled as "ignored failure", this is TODO-B: ok because TBD RULE: - If no build tests nor autopkgtests are included, and/or if the package RULE: requires specific hardware to perform testing, the subscribed team RULE: must provide a written test plan in a comment to the MIR bug, and RULE: commit to running that test either at each upload of the package or RULE: at least once each release cycle. In the comment to the MIR bug, RULE: please link to the codebase of these tests (scripts or doc of manual RULE: steps) and attach a full log of these test runs. This is meant to RULE: assess their validity (e.g. not just superficial). RULE: If possible such things should stay in universe. Sometimes that is RULE: impossible due to the way how features/plugins/dependencies work RULE: but if you are going to ask for promotion of something untestable RULE: please outline why it couldn't provide its value (e.g. by splitting RULE: binaries) to users from universe. RULE: This is a balance that is hard to strike well, the request is that all RULE: options have been exploited before giving up. Look for more details RULE: and backgrounds https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/issues/30 RULE: Just like in the SRU process it is worth to understand what the RULE: consequences a regression (due to a test miss) would be. Therefore RULE: if being untestable we ask to outline what consequences this would RULE: have for the given package.
[Bug 2061754] Re: nullboot 0.5.1
** Tags removed: block-proposed ** Tags added: jammy noble upgrade-software-version ** Tags added: focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061754 Title: nullboot 0.5.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nullboot/+bug/2061754/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066193] Re: jhbuild cannot be installed in noble
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1054720 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1054720 ** Also affects: jhbuild (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1054720 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066193 Title: jhbuild cannot be installed in noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jhbuild/+bug/2066193/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065902] Re: libkkc FTBFS on noble: can't resolve libraries to shared libraries: m
** No longer affects: libkkc (Ubuntu Oracular) ** No longer affects: gobject-introspection (Ubuntu) ** No longer affects: gobject-introspection (Ubuntu Oracular) ** No longer affects: gobject-introspection (Ubuntu Noble) ** Also affects: gobject-introspection (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: libkkc (Ubuntu Noble) ** Also affects: gobject-introspection (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: libkkc (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gobject-introspection (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: gobject-introspection (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released ** Changed in: gobject-introspection (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: libkkc (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Triaged ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1071116 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071116 ** Also affects: libkkc (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071116 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065902 Title: libkkc FTBFS on noble: can't resolve libraries to shared libraries: m To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gobject-introspection/+bug/2065902/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065587] Re: Add explicit dependency on glib 2.80 to ease upgrades 22.04 → 24.04
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Triaged ** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065587 Title: Add explicit dependency on glib 2.80 to ease upgrades 22.04 → 24.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2065587/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065669] Re: Update osinfo-db to 0.20240510
** Description changed:
Impact
==
The purpose of osinfo-db is to provide a database of guest operating systems
for use by virtualization provisioning tools using the libosinfo library. The
two primary users are the GNOME Boxes and Virt Manager apps.
This SRU updates the database to the latest release.
It also includes patches to
- Update Ubuntu 24.04 LTS for the stable release
- EOL changes for Ubuntu 23.04
- Add Ubuntu 24.10 as prerelease so that 24.10 ISOs are recognized (although
it won't be suggested for download by GNOME Boxes)
Test Case 0
===
osinfo-db has an extensive test suite to validate the data files. If the test
suite fails, it will fail the build. These tests are also run as autopkgtests.
Ensure the build succeeds and the autopkgtest passes
Test Case 1
===
1. Install the update
2. Open a terminal and run
sudo apt install gnome-boxes
3. Run gnome-boxes
4. Click + then press "Download an operating system" (The UI varies depending
on the version of gnome-boxes).
5. Select Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x86_64 (Live)
6. The ISO will download to your Downloads folder
7. When it completes, the wizard will prompt you to create a Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
virtual machine.
Complete the wizard.
8. The virtual machine should start. Finish installing Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
inside. Afterwards, restart and log into the Ubuntu 24.04 LTS virtual machine.
9. Open a terminal and run this command: cat /etc/os-release to verify that
you are using Ubuntu 24.04 LTS.
10. Afterwards, you can power off the virtual machine.
Test Case 2
===
From a terminal, run
osinfo-query os vendor="Canonical Ltd"
Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, Ubuntu 22.10, Ubuntu 23.04, and Ubuntu 23.10 should be
included in the list.
Where problems could occur
==
It is always possible to use ISOs not recognized by osinfo-db with either
GNOME Boxes or Virt Manager. osinfo-db provides useful metadata like
recommended RAM, recommended hard disk size, and what virtualized hardware
interfaces are supported.
This update significantly improves the ability of those apps to
recognize distros released in the first half of 2024, while also
updating some metadata details for older releases.
The most likely possible problem is that some download links may no
longer work. However, we know that the Ubuntu 23.04 download links were
broken before this update and 24.04 LTS was marked as pre-release so in
general download links will be better with this update.
+
+ Other Info
+ ==
+ I am not preparing an SRU for Ubuntu 23.10 because it will be End of Life
soon and we encourage its users to switch to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. I expect that by
the time this SRU reaches jammy-updates that meta-release will be updated to
point to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. Therefore, anyone who gets this update on Ubuntu
22.04 LTS ("Jammy") will be prompted to upgrade to 24.04 LTS not 23.10 and
24.04 LTS will have a newer version than 22.04 LTS.
+
+ Even if that doesn't happen, this is a data package, not a security-
+ sensitive package.
** Changed in: osinfo-db (Ubuntu Mantic)
Status: Triaged => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065669
Title:
Update osinfo-db to 0.20240510
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/osinfo-db/+bug/2065669/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059509] Re: Run build tests as autopkgtests
** Changed in: msgraph (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059509 Title: Run build tests as autopkgtests To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msgraph/+bug/2059509/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065669] [NEW] Update osinfo-db to 0.20240510
Public bug reported: Impact == The purpose of osinfo-db is to provide a database of guest operating systems for use by virtualization provisioning tools using the libosinfo library. The two primary users are the GNOME Boxes and Virt Manager apps. This SRU updates the database to the latest release. It also includes patches to - Update Ubuntu 24.04 LTS for the stable release - EOL changes for Ubuntu 23.04 - Add Ubuntu 24.10 as prerelease so that 24.10 ISOs are recognized (although it won't be suggested for download by GNOME Boxes) Test Case 0 === osinfo-db has an extensive test suite to validate the data files. If the test suite fails, it will fail the build. These tests are also run as autopkgtests. Ensure the build succeeds and the autopkgtest passes Test Case 1 === 1. Install the update 2. Open a terminal and run sudo apt install gnome-boxes 3. Run gnome-boxes 4. Click + then press "Download an operating system" (The UI varies depending on the version of gnome-boxes). 5. Select Ubuntu 24.04 LTS x86_64 (Live) 6. The ISO will download to your Downloads folder 7. When it completes, the wizard will prompt you to create a Ubuntu 24.04 LTS virtual machine. Complete the wizard. 8. The virtual machine should start. Finish installing Ubuntu 24.04 LTS inside. Afterwards, restart and log into the Ubuntu 24.04 LTS virtual machine. 9. Open a terminal and run this command: cat /etc/os-release to verify that you are using Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. 10. Afterwards, you can power off the virtual machine. Test Case 2 === From a terminal, run osinfo-query os vendor="Canonical Ltd" Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, Ubuntu 22.10, Ubuntu 23.04, and Ubuntu 23.10 should be included in the list. Where problems could occur == It is always possible to use ISOs not recognized by osinfo-db with either GNOME Boxes or Virt Manager. osinfo-db provides useful metadata like recommended RAM, recommended hard disk size, and what virtualized hardware interfaces are supported. This update significantly improves the ability of those apps to recognize distros released in the first half of 2024, while also updating some metadata details for older releases. The most likely possible problem is that some download links may no longer work. However, we know that the Ubuntu 23.04 download links were broken before this update and 24.04 LTS was marked as pre-release so in general download links will be better with this update. ** Affects: osinfo-db (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Status: Fix Committed ** Affects: osinfo-db (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Medium Status: Triaged ** Affects: osinfo-db (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Medium Status: Triaged ** Affects: osinfo-db (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Medium Status: Triaged ** Tags: jammy mantic noble ** Also affects: osinfo-db (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: osinfo-db (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: osinfo-db (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: osinfo-db (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: osinfo-db (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: osinfo-db (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: osinfo-db (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: osinfo-db (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: osinfo-db (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065669 Title: Update osinfo-db to 0.20240510 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/osinfo-db/+bug/2065669/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065587] Re: Add explicit dependency on glib 2.80 to ease upgrades 22.04 → 24.04
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Also affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065587 Title: Add explicit dependency on glib 2.80 to ease upgrades 22.04 → 24.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2065587/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065587] [NEW] Add explicit dependency on glib 2.80 to ease upgrades 22.04 → 24.04
Public bug reported: Impact -- It was detected that something could cause GNOME Shell to crash during the upgrade from Ubuntu 22.04 LTS to 24.04 LTS. GNOME Shell then was unable to start because it wasn't able to locate the gio 2.0 gir files. Therefore, we are bumping the minimum version of the gir1.2-glib-2.0 dependency to 2.80 so that gnome-shell is not upgraded before the gir file it depends on. Test Case - What Could Go Wrong --- Other Info -- There was a major reorganization in glib 2.80 compared to glib 2.78. The gir file is now built by the glib2.0 source package instead of from gobject-introspection which bumped the package version from 1.78 to 2.78. ** Affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: In Progress ** Tags: noble ** Description changed: Impact -- It was detected that something could cause GNOME Shell to crash during the upgrade from Ubuntu 22.04 LTS to 24.04 LTS. GNOME Shell then was unable to start because it wasn't able to locate the gio 2.0 gir files. Therefore, we are bumping the minimum version of the gir1.2-glib-2.0 dependency to 2.80 so that gnome-shell is not upgraded before the gir file it depends on. Test Case - What Could Go Wrong --- Other Info -- - There was a major reorganization in glib 2.80 compared to glib 2.78. + There was a major reorganization in glib 2.80 compared to glib 2.78. The gir file is now built by the glib2.0 source package instead of from gobject-introspection which bumped the package version from 1.78 to 2.78. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065587 Title: Add explicit dependency on glib 2.80 to ease upgrades 22.04 → 24.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/2065587/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1999480] Re: ubuntu-unity-desktop metapackage requires pulseaudio
Steve, Brian, and I aren't the true maintainers of Ubuntu Unity. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1999480 Title: ubuntu-unity-desktop metapackage requires pulseaudio To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-sound/+bug/1999480/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065361] Re: Create a vanilla Ubuntu flavour without snaps like Debian
Disadvantages - A desktop flavor of Ubuntu practically needs to install a web browser. The only browsers supported by the Ubuntu Security Team are Firefox and Chromium, both distributed only as Snaps in Ubuntu. Also, an increasing number of Ubuntu apps are built with Flutter and Flutter apps are only distributed as Snaps. This includes the upcoming Ubuntu Security Center app. The Ubuntu desktop installer is one of those Flutter apps. etc. Anyway, the Ubuntu Desktop team has no plan to build a version of Ubuntu Desktop without snaps so I'm closing this bug since it will not be fixed in "ubuntu-meta". I don't think this proposal is practical because of the browser issue, but if it were to be done, I am guessing it would be a community flavor. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/RecognizedFlavors ** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065361 Title: Create a vanilla Ubuntu flavour without snaps like Debian To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+bug/2065361/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061744] Re: Evolution crashes on launch: libevolution-rss-common.so: cannot open shared object file
** Also affects: evolution (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: apparmor (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: apparmor (Ubuntu) ** No longer affects: apparmor (Ubuntu Noble) ** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed ** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Triaged ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1070833 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070833 ** Also affects: evolution (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070833 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061744 Title: Evolution crashes on launch: libevolution-rss-common.so: cannot open shared object file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/2061744/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061744] Re: Evolution crashes on launch: libevolution-rss-common.so: cannot open shared object file
** Summary changed: - Evolution crashes on launch: libevolution-rss-common.so: bwrap Creating new namespace failed: Permission denied + Evolution crashes on launch: libevolution-rss-common.so: cannot open shared object file -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061744 Title: Evolution crashes on launch: libevolution-rss-common.so: cannot open shared object file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/2061744/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063221] Re: Drop libglib2.0-0 transitional package
I changed it back for you. There is more documentation about what those bug statuses mean for Stable Release Updates at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure ** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063221 Title: Drop libglib2.0-0 transitional package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/2063221/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065097] Re: Sync libjs-jquery-hotkeys 0~20130707+git2d51e3a9+dfsg-2.1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
This bug was fixed in the package libjs-jquery-hotkeys - 0~20130707+git2d51e3a9+dfsg-2.1 Sponsored for Zixing Liu (liushuyu-011) --- libjs-jquery-hotkeys (0~20130707+git2d51e3a9+dfsg-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium * Non maintainer upload by the Reproducible Builds team. * No source change upload to rebuild on buildd with .buildinfo files. -- Holger Levsen Mon, 28 Dec 2020 13:14:38 +0100 ** Changed in: libjs-jquery-hotkeys (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065097 Title: Sync libjs-jquery-hotkeys 0~20130707+git2d51e3a9+dfsg-2.1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libjs-jquery-hotkeys/+bug/2065097/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063221] Re: Drop libglib2.0-0 transitional package
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063221 Title: Drop libglib2.0-0 transitional package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/2063221/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065042] [NEW] Please blocklist gnome-shell-extension-blur-my-shell
Public bug reported: Please remove and blocklist gnome-shell-extension-blur-my-shell The only GNOME Shell extensions in Ubuntu are those required for the default install or maintained by GNOME or are bundled with an app or service. https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/removal-of-gnome-shell-extension-from- universe-and-stop-auto-syncs/18437/9 ** Affects: gnome-shell-extension-blur-my-shell (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: block-proposed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065042 Title: Please blocklist gnome-shell-extension-blur-my-shell To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-blur-my-shell/+bug/2065042/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061744] Re: Evolution crashes on launch: libevolution-rss-common.so: Creating new namespace failed: Permission denied
** Summary changed: - Evolution crashes on launch with a missing library: /usr/lib/evolution-data-server/camel-providers/libcamelrss.so + Evolution crashes on launch: libevolution-rss-common.so: Creating new namespace failed: Permission denied ** Summary changed: - Evolution crashes on launch: libevolution-rss-common.so: Creating new namespace failed: Permission denied + Evolution crashes on launch: libevolution-rss-common.so: bwrap Creating new namespace failed: Permission denied ** Also affects: apparmor (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: apparmor (Ubuntu) ** Also affects: apparmor (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061744 Title: Evolution crashes on launch: libevolution-rss-common.so: bwrap Creating new namespace failed: Permission denied To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/2061744/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063333] Re: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process
Fixing this issue is a bit more complicated so we're still working through how to do it correctly: https://bugs.debian.org/1070473 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1070473 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070473 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206 Title: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-desktop/+bug/206/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063333] Re: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process
** Changed in: gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206 Title: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-desktop/+bug/206/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063333] Re: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process
** Description changed:
Impact
--
GNOME Remote Desktop won't work for systems that were upgraded from earlier
Ubuntu releases.
Test Case
-
Install Ubuntu Desktop 23.10
Upgrade to 24.04 LTS
Successfully complete both the Basic RDP and Basic Remote Login test cases
from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/RemoteDesktop
What Could Go Wrong
---
The small debian/rules change ensures that systemd-sysusers is run and that
it is run after systemd-tmpfiles.
Both systemd-* commands are limited to only run the gnome-remote-desktop
conf files.
The conffiles simply create the gnome-remote-desktop user with an
appropriate user directory and ensure the existence of /etc/gnome-
remote-desktop/
This is the minimal change needed to fix this bug.
GNOME Remote Desktop only works with GNOME Shell so this change only
affects Ubuntu Desktop and Edubuntu. This change has no effect on new
Ubuntu 24.04 LTS installs because the user and user directory are
already created by the installer. It enables remote desktop to work for
systems that upgrade to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. Remote desktop can be a
critical feature for some users who may not have local access to the
system they are trying to use. However, this feature is a bit less
useful before Ubuntu 24.04 LTS which is the first version to support
headless remote desktop using RDP.
Other Info
--
The added lines to postinst are marked with a leading +:
# Automatically added by dh_installtmpfiles/13.15.3
if [ "$1" = "configure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-upgrade" ] || [ "$1" =
"abort-deconfigure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-remove" ] ; then
if [ -x "$(command -v systemd-tmpfiles)" ]; then
systemd-tmpfiles ${DPKG_ROOT:+--root="$DPKG_ROOT"} --create
gnome-remote-desktop-tmpfiles.conf || true
fi
fi
# End automatically added section
+# Automatically added by dh_installsysusers/13.15.3
+if [ "$1" = "configure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-upgrade" ] || [ "$1" =
"abort-+deconfigure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-remove" ] ; then
+ systemd-sysusers ${DPKG_ROOT:+--root="$DPKG_ROOT"}
gnome-remote-desktop-sysusers.conf
+fi
+ +
+# End automatically added section
+ +# Automatically added by dh_installtmpfiles/13.15.3
+ +if [ "$1" = "configure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-upgrade" ] || [ "$1" =
"abort-deconfigure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-remove" ] ; then
+ + if [ -x "$(command -v systemd-tmpfiles)" ]; then
+ + systemd-tmpfiles ${DPKG_ROOT:+--root="$DPKG_ROOT"} --create
+ +gnome-remote-desktop-tmpfiles.conf || true
+ + fi
+ +fi
+ +# End automatically added section
+
# Automatically added by dh_installsystemduser/13.15.3
if [ "$1" = "configure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-upgrade" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-
deconfigure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-remove" ] ; then
if [ -z "${DPKG_ROOT:-}" ]; then
if deb-systemd-helper --user debian-installed
'gnome-remote-desktop-handover.service' ; then
# The following line should be removed in trixie or
trixie+1
deb-systemd-helper --user unmask 'gnome-remote-desktop-handover.service'
>/dev/null || true
Workaround
--
- If you are affected by this issue, you can safely run the same 2 commands
that this upgrade would run:
+ If you are affected by this issue, you can safely run the same 3 commands
that this upgrade would run:
sudo systemd-tmpfiles --create /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/gnome-remote-desktop-
tmpfiles.conf
sudo systemd-sysusers /usr/lib/sysusers.d/gnome-remote-desktop-
sysusers.conf
+
+ sudo systemd-tmpfiles --create /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/gnome-remote-desktop-
+ tmpfiles.conf
+
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: gnome-remote-desktop 46.1-1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-31.31.1-generic 6.8.1
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-31-generic riscv64
ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu2
Architecture: riscv64
CasperMD5json:
{
"result": "skip"
}
Date: Wed Apr 24 12:34:26 2024
InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-04-24 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Release riscv64
(20240423)
SourcePackage: gnome-remote-desktop
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206
Title:
gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No
such process
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-desktop/+bug/206/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063333] Re: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process
are
+ already created by the installer. It enables remote desktop to work for
+ systems that upgrade to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. Remote desktop can be a
+ critical feature for some users who may not have local access to the
+ system they are trying to use. However, this feature is a bit less
+ useful before Ubuntu 24.04 LTS which is the first version to support
+ headless remote desktop using RDP.
+
+ Other Info
+ --
+ The added lines to postinst are marked with a leading +:
+
+ # Automatically added by dh_installtmpfiles/13.15.3
+ if [ "$1" = "configure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-upgrade" ] || [ "$1" =
"abort-deconfigure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-remove" ] ; then
+ if [ -x "$(command -v systemd-tmpfiles)" ]; then
+ systemd-tmpfiles ${DPKG_ROOT:+--root="$DPKG_ROOT"} --create
+ gnome-remote-desktop-tmpfiles.conf || true
+ fi
+ fi
+ # End automatically added section
+ +# Automatically added by dh_installsysusers/13.15.3
+ +if [ "$1" = "configure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-upgrade" ] || [ "$1" =
"abort-+deconfigure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-remove" ] ; then
+ + systemd-sysusers ${DPKG_ROOT:+--root="$DPKG_ROOT"}
gnome-remote-desktop-sysusers.conf
+ +fi
+ +# End automatically added section
+ # Automatically added by dh_installsystemduser/13.15.3
+ if [ "$1" = "configure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-upgrade" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-
deconfigure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-remove" ] ; then
+ if [ -z "${DPKG_ROOT:-}" ]; then
+ if deb-systemd-helper --user debian-installed
'gnome-remote-desktop-handover.service' ; then
+ # The following line should be removed in trixie or
+ trixie+1
+ deb-systemd-helper --user unmask
'gnome-remote-desktop-handover.service' >/dev/null || true
+
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: gnome-remote-desktop 46.1-1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-31.31.1-generic 6.8.1
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-31-generic riscv64
ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu2
Architecture: riscv64
CasperMD5json:
- {
-"result": "skip"
- }
+ {
+ "result": "skip"
+ }
Date: Wed Apr 24 12:34:26 2024
InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-04-24 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Release riscv64
(20240423)
SourcePackage: gnome-remote-desktop
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
** Changed in: gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu Noble)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jeremy Bícha (jbicha)
** Description changed:
Impact
--
GNOME Remote Desktop won't work for systems that were upgraded from earlier
Ubuntu releases.
Test Case
-
Install Ubuntu Desktop 23.10
Upgrade to 24.04 LTS
Successfully complete both the Basic RDP and Basic Remote Login test cases
from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/RemoteDesktop
What Could Go Wrong
---
The small debian/rules change ensures that systemd-sysusers is run and that
it is run after systemd-tmpfiles.
Both systemd-* commands are limited to only run the gnome-remote-desktop
conf files.
The conffiles simply create the gnome-remote-desktop user with an
appropriate user directory and ensure the existence of /etc/gnome-
remote-desktop/
This is the minimal change needed to fix this bug.
GNOME Remote Desktop only works with GNOME Shell so this change only
affects Ubuntu Desktop and Edubuntu. This change has no effect on new
Ubuntu 24.04 LTS installs because the user and user directory are
already created by the installer. It enables remote desktop to work for
systems that upgrade to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. Remote desktop can be a
critical feature for some users who may not have local access to the
system they are trying to use. However, this feature is a bit less
useful before Ubuntu 24.04 LTS which is the first version to support
headless remote desktop using RDP.
Other Info
--
The added lines to postinst are marked with a leading +:
- # Automatically added by dh_installtmpfiles/13.15.3
- if [ "$1" = "configure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-upgrade" ] || [ "$1" =
"abort-deconfigure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-remove" ] ; then
- if [ -x "$(command -v systemd-tmpfiles)" ]; then
- systemd-tmpfiles ${DPKG_ROOT:+--root="$DPKG_ROOT"} --create
- gnome-remote-desktop-tmpfiles.conf || true
- fi
- fi
- # End automatically added section
+ # Automatically added by dh_installtmpfiles/13.15.3
+ if [ "$1" = "configure" ] || [ "$1" = "
[Bug 2063333] Re: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process
** Tags added: block-proposed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206 Title: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-desktop/+bug/206/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063333] Re: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process
** Also affects: gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206 Title: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-desktop/+bug/206/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056767] Re: FFe: Sync gnome-software 46.0-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) with gnome-software packaging split
** Also affects: gnome-software (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056767 Title: FFe: Sync gnome-software 46.0-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) with gnome-software packaging split To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/2056767/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061269] Re: Alacritty panics on startup
I successfully completed the test case with alacritty 0.13.2-1ubuntu1 on Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-noble ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-noble ** Summary changed: - Alacritty panics on startup + Alacritty panics on startup when used on Wayland -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061269 Title: Alacritty panics on startup when used on Wayland To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rust-alacritty/+bug/2061269/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062177] Re: Remmina crashes after RDP connection
This was fixed in oracular via https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/remmina/1.4.35+dfsg-2 ** Changed in: remmina (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062177 Title: Remmina crashes after RDP connection To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/remmina/+bug/2062177/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2016699] Re: elementpath breaks python-xmlschema autopkgtest: 'XMLSchemaContext' object has no attribute 'iter'
Fixed in oracular after autosyncs: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/p/python- xmlschema/oracular/ppc64el ** Changed in: python-xmlschema (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: elementpath (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2016699 Title: elementpath breaks python-xmlschema autopkgtest: 'XMLSchemaContext' object has no attribute 'iter' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elementpath/+bug/2016699/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059172] Re: autopkgtest failure with perl/5.38.2-3.2
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/libcairo-gobject-perl ** Changed in: perl (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: perl (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059172 Title: autopkgtest failure with perl/5.38.2-3.2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/perl/+bug/2059172/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064647] Re: Documentation for how to enable gnome-remote-desktop on a completly headless system
Ok, so we also need to run sudo systemd-tmpfiles when we fix https://launchpad.net/bugs/206 You can run that. I don't know if that will be enough to fix your issue though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064647 Title: Documentation for how to enable gnome-remote-desktop on a completly headless system To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-desktop/+bug/2064647/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064762] [NEW] Update gnome-control-center to 46.1
Public bug reported: Impact -- There was a new bugfix release in the stable 46 series. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/compare/46.0...46.1 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/releases/46.1 Test Case 1 --- Install the update. Make sure that gnome-control-center continues to run well. Test Case 2 --- Install gnome-session Log out. Click your name on the login screen. Click the gear in the bottom right corner and choose GNOME. Finish logging in. Make sure that gnome-control-center continues to run well. This test case is because some of our Ubuntu customizations only show in the Ubuntu session, not other sessions like vanilla GNOME. Test Case 3 --- Open gnome-control-center Click the last item in the left sidebar named About Click Device Name. Type in a different name for your computer. Press Enter. The Rename Device dialog should close and your new computer name should take effect. What Could Go Wrong --- gnome-control-center is used by Ubuntu Desktop and Edubuntu. It is a critical app for viewing and changing a huge variety of settings for these desktops. gnome-control-center is part of GNOME Core and has a microrelease exception for Ubuntu stable release updates. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/GNOME ** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Fix Committed ** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: High Status: Triaged ** Tags: noble upgrade-software-version ** Also affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064762 Title: Update gnome-control-center to 46.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/2064762/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064735] [NEW] Update mutter to 46.1
Public bug reported: I am not working on this SRU but I'm filing this in case someone else works on it later. Impact -- There is a new bugfix release in the stable 46 series. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/blob/46.1/NEWS Test Case - Complete the test case from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/Mutter What Could Go Wrong --- Mutter is an essential component of the default Ubuntu desktop and for the desktop used by Ubuntu Budgie. A severe enough bug could mean that people are unable to use their desktop version of Ubuntu. Smaller bugs could interrupt people's workflows. mutter is part of GNOME Core and is included in the GNOME micro release exception https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/GNOME Other Info -- ** Affects: mutter (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Fix Committed ** Affects: mutter (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: High Status: Triaged ** Tags: noble upgrade-software-version ** Tags added: upgrade-software-version ** Also affects: mutter (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064735 Title: Update mutter to 46.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/2064735/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064732] [NEW] Update xdg-desktop-portal-gnome to 46.1
Public bug reported: I'm not working on this SRU now but I'm filing this stub in case someone wants to work on it later. Impact -- There is a new bugfix release in the stable 46.x series. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/xdg-desktop-portal-gnome/-/blob/46.1/NEWS https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/xdg-desktop-portal-gnome/-/compare/46.0...46.1 Test Plan - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/XdgDesktopPortalGnome What Could Go Wrong --- xdg-desktop-portal-gnome is critical functionality for Snaps and Flatpaks including providing the file chooser dialogs for both of the only security supported web browsers in Ubuntu: firefox and chromium (both as snaps) xdg-desktop-portal-gnome is shipped only by Ubuntu Desktop (and Edubuntu). xdg-desktop-portal-gnome is also used in some apps that are distributed as .deb packages, for instance it is used for the Set as Background feature in the Nautilus file browser. ** Affects: xdg-desktop-portal-gnome (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Fix Committed ** Affects: xdg-desktop-portal-gnome (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: High Status: Triaged ** Tags: noble upgrade-software-version ** Also affects: xdg-desktop-portal-gnome (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: xdg-desktop-portal-gnome (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: xdg-desktop-portal-gnome (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064732 Title: Update xdg-desktop-portal-gnome to 46.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdg-desktop-portal-gnome/+bug/2064732/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2030909] Re: libsqlite3-0-dbgsym depends on 3.37.2-2 but the repos only contain 3.37.2-2ubuntu0.1
This appears to be up-to-date now. libsqlite3-0-dbgsym_3.37.2-2ubuntu0.3_amd64.ddeb is available at http://ddebs.ubuntu.com/pool/main/s/sqlite3/ which matches the version of the library available in the regular archives for Ubuntu 22.04 LTS. ** Changed in: sqlite3 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2030909 Title: libsqlite3-0-dbgsym depends on 3.37.2-2 but the repos only contain 3.37.2-2ubuntu0.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sqlite3/+bug/2030909/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063447] Re: netavark fails to build
This SRU is currently blocked because the update fails to build on ppc64el. There's an issue with the vendored rustix dependency: error: could not find native static library `rustix_outline_powerpc64` One way to handle this would be to attempt partial vendoring of only the specific Rust crates we need to bypass the rust-zbus unavailability issue. I don't have experience with partial vendoring yet. But it's been done for qwertone and will probably be done for squeekboard soon. ** Also affects: netavark (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: netavark (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Incomplete ** Changed in: netavark (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => High ** Tags added: block-proposed-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063447 Title: netavark fails to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netavark/+bug/2063447/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064643] Re: 46.1 stable update
** Also affects: nautilus (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Sebastien Bacher (seb128) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064643 Title: 46.1 stable update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/2064643/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062394] Re: Update xdg-desktop-portal to 1.18.4
** Description changed: - This includes part of a CVE security fix; the more important part of the - CVE is in flatpak but there is some hardening on the xdg-desktop-portal - side. + Impact + -- + This includes part of a CVE security fix; the more important part of the CVE is in flatpak but there is some hardening on the xdg-desktop-portal side. https://github.com/flatpak/xdg-desktop-portal/releases/tag/1.18.4 https://github.com/flatpak/xdg-desktop-portal/compare/1.18.3...1.18.4 + + Test Plan + - + Run the tests from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/XdgDesktopPortalGnome + + What Could Go Wrong + -- + xdg-desktop-portal is critical functionality for Snaps and Flatpaks including providing the file chooser dialogs for both of the only security supported web browsers in Ubuntu: firefox and chromium (both as snaps) + + xdg-desktop-portal is included in every official Ubuntu desktop flavor + as it has become essential functionality for modern desktops. When used + by desktops, there is a separate backend package to provide the UI. For + Ubuntu Desktop, this is xdg-desktop-portal-gnome. Several other desktops + use xdg-desktop-portal-gtk (even Ubuntu Desktop uses it as a dependency + of -gnome) but there are other backends that follow the standard naming + convention xdg-desktop-portal-* + + xdg-desktop-portal also is used in some apps that are distributed as + .deb packages, for instance it is used for the Set as Background feature + in the Nautilus file browser. + + Other Info + -- + (none) ** Description changed: Impact -- - This includes part of a CVE security fix; the more important part of the CVE is in flatpak but there is some hardening on the xdg-desktop-portal side. + This is a new release in the stable 1.18.x series. It includes part of a CVE security fix; the more important part of the CVE is in flatpak but there is some hardening on the xdg-desktop-portal side. https://github.com/flatpak/xdg-desktop-portal/releases/tag/1.18.4 https://github.com/flatpak/xdg-desktop-portal/compare/1.18.3...1.18.4 Test Plan - Run the tests from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/XdgDesktopPortalGnome What Could Go Wrong -- xdg-desktop-portal is critical functionality for Snaps and Flatpaks including providing the file chooser dialogs for both of the only security supported web browsers in Ubuntu: firefox and chromium (both as snaps) xdg-desktop-portal is included in every official Ubuntu desktop flavor as it has become essential functionality for modern desktops. When used by desktops, there is a separate backend package to provide the UI. For Ubuntu Desktop, this is xdg-desktop-portal-gnome. Several other desktops use xdg-desktop-portal-gtk (even Ubuntu Desktop uses it as a dependency of -gnome) but there are other backends that follow the standard naming convention xdg-desktop-portal-* xdg-desktop-portal also is used in some apps that are distributed as .deb packages, for instance it is used for the Set as Background feature in the Nautilus file browser. Other Info -- (none) ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2024-32462 ** Also affects: xdg-desktop-portal (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: xdg-desktop-portal (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: xdg-desktop-portal (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: xdg-desktop-portal (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062394 Title: Update xdg-desktop-portal to 1.18.4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdg-desktop-portal/+bug/2062394/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064647] Re: Documentation for how to enable gnome-remote-desktop on a completly headless system
Are you able to file this issue upstream also? https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-remote-desktop/-/issues There is also the grdctrl command, but I don't see enough detail in its manpage to solve your request. ** Changed in: gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064647 Title: Documentation for how to enable gnome-remote-desktop on a completly headless system To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-desktop/+bug/2064647/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063333] Re: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process
There is some initial configuration you should do in the GNOME Settings app (gnome-control-center) > System > Remote Desktop > Remote Login before you can later use your computer headless via RDP. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206 Title: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-desktop/+bug/206/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063333] Re: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process
Robert, do things work if you log out and log back in without trying to invoke gnome-remote-desktop manually? ** Changed in: gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206 Title: gnome-remote-desktop.service: Failed to determine user credentials: No such process To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-desktop/+bug/206/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056767] Re: FFe: Sync gnome-software 46.0-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) with gnome-software packaging split
** Tags removed: block-proposed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056767 Title: FFe: Sync gnome-software 46.0-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) with gnome-software packaging split To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/2056767/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063402] Re: poco transition
** Changed in: poco (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063402 Title: poco transition To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/poco/+bug/2063402/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058401] Re: Enable automated tests
I am handling this via Debian and the changes will be synced to Oracular soon. Therefore, I am unsubscribing ubuntu-sponsors. Feel free to resubscribe if you have something else that needs to be sponsored. I pushed the autopkgtests there but I needed to add a commit to fix some issues seen there: https://salsa.debian.org/debian-remote-team/freerdp3/-/commit/f814cdf193 I opened a merge request to get some more feedback from an upstream developer about why enabling build tests lead to a major increase in exported symbols: https://salsa.debian.org/debian-remote-team/freerdp3/-/merge_requests/4 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058401 Title: Enable automated tests To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freerdp3/+bug/2058401/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2052437] Re: python-boto: obsolete, replaced by python-boto3
** Changed in: dask (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052437 Title: python-boto: obsolete, replaced by python-boto3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dask/+bug/2052437/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1995703] Re: Update gnome-maps to 43.1
** Changed in: gnome-maps (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1995703 Title: Update gnome-maps to 43.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-maps/+bug/1995703/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063221] Re: Drop libglib2.0-0 transitional package
** Description changed: Impact -- apt can struggle with ordering when handling the massive Y2028 time_t transition when upgrading to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. It was identified that dropping the libglib2.0-0 transitional package can help apt do things in the correct order. + Technically, Steve Langasek already removed libglib2.0-0 from noble + release just before release. This upload is necessary to ensure that we + don't accidentally bring it back. + Test Case - - Is libglib2.0-0 built? + 1. Is libglib2.0-0 built? + + 2. Run rmadison libglib2.0-0 + There should be 0 results for noble, noble-proposed, or noble-updates + + 3. Ensure that libglib2.0-0 is removed during the upgrade from Ubuntu + 22.04 LTS to 24.04 LTS. Technically, ubuntu-release-upgrader is + currently set to disallow upgrades to 24.04 LTS. If this is still the + case when it is time to verify this SRU, you can manually substitute + jammy → noble in /etc/apt/sources.list for purposes of testing this + upgrade, probably in a VM since that's not the supported way to upgrade. Where Problems Could Occur -- We have landed the change from this SRU in Debian Unstable and it successfully migrated to Debian Testing on April 27 as one of the first t64 packages to migrate there. This SRU was recommended by Julian Klode, the apt maintainer for Debian and Ubuntu. The original transitional package was added by Simon McVittie in hopes that it would help apt be able to calculate the upgrade easier. At least in the Ubuntu Desktop 22.04 LTS → 24.04 LTS case, it looks like it was the opposite. - Hmm, we can't actually drop libglib2.0-0 after release, can we? - Other Info -- This is related to LP: #2061918 for the thunderbird deb to snap upgrade There are likely several other Launchpad bugs that can be resolved by this update and some other workarounds in other packages, like in the transitional thunderbird package. https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/glib/-/merge_requests/34 ** Description changed: Impact -- apt can struggle with ordering when handling the massive Y2028 time_t transition when upgrading to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. It was identified that dropping the libglib2.0-0 transitional package can help apt do things in the correct order. Technically, Steve Langasek already removed libglib2.0-0 from noble release just before release. This upload is necessary to ensure that we don't accidentally bring it back. Test Case - 1. Is libglib2.0-0 built? 2. Run rmadison libglib2.0-0 There should be 0 results for noble, noble-proposed, or noble-updates 3. Ensure that libglib2.0-0 is removed during the upgrade from Ubuntu 22.04 LTS to 24.04 LTS. Technically, ubuntu-release-upgrader is currently set to disallow upgrades to 24.04 LTS. If this is still the case when it is time to verify this SRU, you can manually substitute jammy → noble in /etc/apt/sources.list for purposes of testing this upgrade, probably in a VM since that's not the supported way to upgrade. Where Problems Could Occur -- - We have landed the change from this SRU in Debian Unstable and it successfully migrated to Debian Testing on April 27 as one of the first t64 packages to migrate there. - - This SRU was recommended by Julian Klode, the apt maintainer for Debian - and Ubuntu. - - The original transitional package was added by Simon McVittie in hopes - that it would help apt be able to calculate the upgrade easier. At least - in the Ubuntu Desktop 22.04 LTS → 24.04 LTS case, it looks like it was - the opposite. + Doing an upload to not build a package that already does not exist in Ubuntu 24.04 LTS should have no regression potential. The only other change in this SRU is bumping the Breaks version to ensure that the transitional libglib2.0-0 is also removed for people who were using Ubuntu 24.04 LTS early. That also should not cause problems since the package was an empty transitional package for early Ubuntu 24.04 LTS users. Other Info -- This is related to LP: #2061918 for the thunderbird deb to snap upgrade There are likely several other Launchpad bugs that can be resolved by - this update and some other workarounds in other packages, like in the - transitional thunderbird package. + removing the transitional package and some other workarounds in other + packages, like in the transitional thunderbird package. https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/glib/-/merge_requests/34 + + We have landed the removal in Debian Unstable and it successfully + migrated to Debian Testing on April 27 as one of the first t64 packages + to migrate there. + + The removal was recommended by Julian Klode, the apt maintainer for + Debian and Ubuntu. + + The original transitional package was added by Simon McVittie in hopes + that it would help apt be able to calculate the upgrade
[Bug 2063221] Re: Drop libglib2.0-0 transitional package
** Description changed: Impact -- apt can struggle with ordering when handling the massive Y2028 time_t transition when upgrading to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. It was identified that dropping the libglib2.0-0 transitional package can help apt do things in the correct order. Test Case - Is libglib2.0-0 built? + Where Problems Could Occur + -- + We have landed the change from this SRU in Debian Unstable and it successfully migrated to Debian Testing on April 27 as one of the first t64 packages to migrate there. + + This SRU was recommended by Julian Klode, the apt maintainer for Debian + and Ubuntu. + + The original transitional package was added by Simon McVittie in hopes + that it would help apt be able to calculate the upgrade easier. At least + in the Ubuntu Desktop 22.04 LTS → 24.04 LTS case, it looks like it was + the opposite. + + Hmm, we can't actually drop libglib2.0-0 after release, can we? + Other Info -- This is related to LP: #2061918 for the thunderbird deb to snap upgrade There are likely several other Launchpad bugs that can be resolved by this update and some other workarounds in other packages, like in the transitional thunderbird package. https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/glib/-/merge_requests/34 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063221 Title: Drop libglib2.0-0 transitional package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/2063221/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064166] [NEW] Exclude alacritty from Ubuntu Cinnamon ISOs
Public bug reported: alacritty is unintentionally included in Ubuntu Cinnamon 24.04 LTS even though the Ubuntu Cinnamon metapackages do not recommend or depend on it. I'm filing the bug here even though ubuntucinnamon-meta won't need to be updated, just the seed, because there is nowhere else to report bugs about seeds. A few things that could be tried: - move the gnome-terminal dependency to a higher location in the seed - try adding !alacritty to the seed. ! usually does not make any difference but maybe it would here? You probably want to get this working in oracular before trying to backport whatever is successful to the noble seed. Unfortunately, because there is nothing depending on alacritty, I do not believe it is possible for alacritty to be automatically safely removed from people's computers who install Ubuntu Cinnamon using Ubuntu 23.10 or the original 24.04 LTS, but it can be excluded from the 24.04.1 LTS ISO that will be published a few months from now. Additional info about how it got seeded and if it is working https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/germinate-output/ubuntucinnamon.noble/ https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/noble/ubuntucinnamon/ https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntucinnamon/daily-live/current/ (especially the manifest file) ** Affects: ubuntucinnamon-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Triaged ** Tags: noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064166 Title: Exclude alacritty from Ubuntu Cinnamon ISOs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntucinnamon-meta/+bug/2064166/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063879] Re: [SRU] EasyEffects Depends: calf-plugins should be Recommends
Would it be better to demote calf-plugins to Suggests or not even include it in the package dependencies at all if lsp-plugins can do the job? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063879 Title: [SRU] EasyEffects Depends: calf-plugins should be Recommends To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/easyeffects/+bug/2063879/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063221] Re: Drop libglib2.0-0 transitional package
** Tags removed: block-proposed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063221 Title: Drop libglib2.0-0 transitional package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/2063221/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063450] Re: obfuscate fails to build
** Changed in: obfuscate (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063450 Title: obfuscate fails to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/obfuscate/+bug/2063450/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063450] [NEW] obfuscate fails to build
Public bug reported: obfuscate fails to build in Ubuntu but not in Debian which has similar dependencies. I reported the issue but did not get much of a specific answer. https://gitlab.gnome.org/World/obfuscate/-/issues/64 There is very little time left before Ubuntu 24.04 LTS is finalized. Therefore, let's revendor obfuscate, similar to what we do with Snapshot where vendoring is required to meet current Main Inclusion policy. ** Affects: obfuscate (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Fix Committed ** Tags: ftbfs noble update-excuse ** Description changed: obfuscate fails to build in Ubuntu but not in Debian which has similar dependencies. - I reported the issue but did not get much of a specific answer. There is - very little time left before Ubuntu 24.04 LTS is finalized. + I reported the issue but did not get much of a specific answer. - Therefore, let's revendor obfuscate, similar to what we dowith Snapshot + https://gitlab.gnome.org/World/obfuscate/-/issues/64 + + There is very little time left before Ubuntu 24.04 LTS is finalized. + Therefore, let's revendor obfuscate, similar to what we do with Snapshot where vendoring is required to meet current Main Inclusion policy. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063450 Title: obfuscate fails to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/obfuscate/+bug/2063450/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063447] [NEW] netavark fails to build
Public bug reported: netavark fails to build. It has a build-dependency on ust-zbus which has been removed. Unfortunately, rust-zbus is not easily buildable with the current packaged Rust crates, and there is very little time left before Ubuntu 24.04 LTS is finalized. Therefore, let's revendor netavark. (This is not that different from what we do with Snapshot where vendoring is required to meet current Main Inclusion policy.) Also aardvark-dns depends on netavark >= 1.6 ** Affects: netavark (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Fix Committed ** Tags: ftbfs noble update-excuse ** Description changed: - n + netavark fails to build. + + It has a build-dependency on ust-zbus which has been removed. + + Unfortunately, rust-zbus is not easily buildable with the current + packaged Rust crates, and there is very little time left before Ubuntu + 24.04 LTS is finalized. + + Therefore, let's revendor netavark. + + (This is not that different from what we do with Snapshot where + vendoring is required to meet current Main Inclusion policy.) + + Also aardvark-dns depends on netavark >= 1.6 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063447 Title: netavark fails to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netavark/+bug/2063447/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063402] [NEW] poco transition
Public bug reported: the new poco upload starts a package transition but it's too late for noble ** Affects: poco (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Triaged ** Tags: block-proposed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063402 Title: poco transition To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/poco/+bug/2063402/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063401] [NEW] aardvark-dns fails to build
Public bug reported: aardvark-dns fails to build in noble ** Affects: aardvark-dns (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Fix Committed ** Tags: ftbfs noble update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063401 Title: aardvark-dns fails to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aardvark-dns/+bug/2063401/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063396] Re: amberol fails to build
** Changed in: amberol (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063396 Title: amberol fails to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amberol/+bug/2063396/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063396] [NEW] amberol fails to build
Public bug reported: amberol fails to build. It has a dependency chain on rust-zbus. Unfortunately, rust-zbus is not easily buildable with the current packaged Rust crates, and there is very little time left before Ubuntu 24.04 LTS is finalized. Therefore, let's revendor amberol. (This is not that different from what we do with Snapshot where vendoring is required to meet current Main Inclusion policy.) ** Affects: amberol (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Triaged ** Tags: ftbfs noble update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063396 Title: amberol fails to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amberol/+bug/2063396/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063382] Re: loupe fails to build
** Changed in: glycin-loaders (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed ** Changed in: loupe (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063382 Title: loupe fails to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glycin-loaders/+bug/2063382/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063382] Re: loupe fails to build
** Also affects: glycin-loaders (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: glycin-loaders (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: glycin-loaders (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063382 Title: loupe fails to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glycin-loaders/+bug/2063382/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063392] [NEW] Please remove obsolete swig3.0
Public bug reported: swig3.0 is an old duplicate of the swig source. It was added in Ubuntu for https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/swig3.0/3.0.12-2.2ubuntu1 It has no reverse dependencies and is not in Debian. Therefore please remove it. $ reverse-depends -b src:swig3.0 No reverse dependencies found $ reverse-depends src:swig3.0 No reverse dependencies found ** Affects: swig3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063392 Title: Please remove obsolete swig3.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/swig3.0/+bug/2063392/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062406] Re: CVE-2024-32462: Sandbox escape via RequestBackground portal and CWE-88
Jeff, that's just how Launchpad is configured. Sorry. But there is a better way to look for security issues in a package than trying to navigate Launchpad: https://ubuntu.com/security/cves?package=flatpak -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062406 Title: CVE-2024-32462: Sandbox escape via RequestBackground portal and CWE-88 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/2062406/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061269] Re: Alacritty panics on startup
** Description changed: - After upgrading to ubuntu 24.04 beta, alacritty fails with the following - message on startup: + Impact + --- + After upgrading to ubuntu 24.04 beta, alacritty fails with the following message on startup: thread 'main' panicked at 'called `Option::unwrap()` on a `None` value', /usr/share/cargo/registry/glutin-0.30.9/src/api/egl/surface.rs:246:44 note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace + + Test Case + - + Install alacritty on Ubuntu Desktop + Run alacritty + Run + echo $XDG_SESSION_TYPE + to verify you are using a Wayland session. The bug reported here does not affect Xorg sessions. + ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: alacritty 0.12.2-2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-22.22-generic 6.8.1 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-22-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Sun Apr 14 09:46:38 2024 InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-08-06 (252 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 23.04 "Lunar Lobster" - Release amd64 (20230418) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 PATH=(custom, no user) SHELL=/bin/bash TERM=xterm-256color XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= SourcePackage: rust-alacritty UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to noble on 2024-04-13 (0 days ago) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061269 Title: Alacritty panics on startup To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rust-alacritty/+bug/2061269/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061269] Re: Alacritty panics on startup
** Changed in: rust-alacritty (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061269 Title: Alacritty panics on startup To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rust-alacritty/+bug/2061269/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063382] [NEW] loupe fails to build
Public bug reported: loupe fails to build. It has a dependency chain on glycin-loaders which depends on rust-zbus which has been removed. Unfortunately, rust-zbus is not easily buildable with the current packaged Rust crates, and there is very little time left before Ubuntu 24.04 LTS is finalized. Therefore, let's revendor Loupe and glycin-loaders. (This is not that different from what we do with Snapshot where vendoring is required to meet current Main Inclusion policy.) ** Affects: loupe (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Triaged ** Tags: ftbfs noble update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063382 Title: loupe fails to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/loupe/+bug/2063382/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063378] [NEW] qwertone fails to build after removal of Rust GTK3 packages
Public bug reported: qwertone needs to vendor its rust-gtk dependencies ** Affects: qwertone (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: In Progress ** Tags: noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063378 Title: qwertone fails to build after removal of Rust GTK3 packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qwertone/+bug/2063378/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061269] Re: Alacritty panics on startup
** Changed in: rust-alacritty (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: rust-alacritty (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061269 Title: Alacritty panics on startup To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rust-alacritty/+bug/2061269/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063267] Re: system monitor extension gtop library dependency error
** Changed in: gnome-shell-extensions (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063267 Title: system monitor extension gtop library dependency error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extensions/+bug/2063267/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063267] Re: system monitor extension gtop library dependency error
** Changed in: gnome-shell-extensions (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: gnome-shell-extensions (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063267 Title: system monitor extension gtop library dependency error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extensions/+bug/2063267/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063221] Re: Drop libglib2.0-0 transitional package
** Tags added: block-proposed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063221 Title: Drop libglib2.0-0 transitional package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/2063221/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063221] Re: Drop libglib2.0-0 transitional package
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063221 Title: Drop libglib2.0-0 transitional package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/2063221/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060659] Re: X11 fractional scaling support is missing in 46.0
Kostya, please file separate bugs for separate issues. Comments on closed bugs can easily be missed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060659 Title: X11 fractional scaling support is missing in 46.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/magpie/+bug/2060659/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063221] [NEW] Drop libglib2.0-0 transitional package
Public bug reported: Impact -- apt can struggle with ordering when handling the massive Y2028 time_t transition when upgrading to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. It was identified that dropping the libglib2.0-0 transitional package can help apt do things in the correct order. Test Case - Is libglib2.0-0 built? Other Info -- This is related to LP: #2061918 for the thunderbird deb to snap upgrade There are likely several other Launchpad bugs that can be resolved by this update and some other workarounds in other packages, like in the transitional thunderbird package. https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/glib/-/merge_requests/34 ** Affects: glib2.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Triaged ** Tags: noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063221 Title: Drop libglib2.0-0 transitional package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/2063221/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063138] Re: upgrade from mantic to noble disables gr lanaguage
Can you reproduce this issue, perhaps in a virtual machine? First install Ubuntu 22.04 LTS or 23.10, get your language support working, and then perform the upgrade. Does the bug still happen? ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063138 Title: upgrade from mantic to noble disables gr lanaguage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2063138/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2027893] Re: I Don't know
** Changed in: gnome-shell-extensions (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2027893 Title: I Don't know To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extensions/+bug/2027893/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1793972] Re: package doesn't actually install any extensions
** Changed in: gnome-shell-extensions (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1793972 Title: package doesn't actually install any extensions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extensions/+bug/1793972/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1895448] Re: No idea what the bug is. i ran ubuntu-bug gnome-shell-extensions
** Changed in: gnome-shell-extensions (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895448 Title: No idea what the bug is. i ran ubuntu-bug gnome-shell-extensions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extensions/+bug/1895448/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063167] Re: loki-ecmwf uninstallable issue
** Changed in: loki-ecmwf (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063167 Title: loki-ecmwf uninstallable issue To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/loki-ecmwf/+bug/2063167/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063167] [NEW] loki-ecmwf uninstallable issue
Public bug reported: I have synced fparser to the noble NEW queue to fix the uninstallability issue with loki-ecmwf I'm filing this bug so that others don't have to try to figure the issue out. ** Affects: loki-ecmwf (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: In Progress ** Tags: noble update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063167 Title: loki-ecmwf uninstallable issue To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/loki-ecmwf/+bug/2063167/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063138] Re: upgrade from mantic to noble disables gr lanaguage
** Package changed: language-pack-gnome-el (Ubuntu) => ubuntu-release- upgrader (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063138 Title: upgrade from mantic to noble disables gr lanaguage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2063138/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063142] Re: Ubuntu Studio unable to upgrade from Mantic to Noble
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063142 Title: Ubuntu Studio unable to upgrade from Mantic to Noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2063142/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061316] Re: first screen refers to Noble Numbat (development branch)
I'm closing since base-files is now in noble-proposed and should migrate to -release soon. Here's the updated screenshot. ** Attachment added: "Screenshot from 2024-04-22 11-30-38.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/base-files/+bug/2061316/+attachment/5769448/+files/Screenshot%20from%202024-04-22%2011-30-38.png ** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu Noble) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061316 Title: first screen refers to Noble Numbat (development branch) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/base-files/+bug/2061316/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060659] Re: X11 fractional scaling support is missing in 46.0
I'm dropping the block-proposed tag now that the second mutter upload has landed in -proposed and been seen by britney. ** Tags removed: block-proposed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060659 Title: X11 fractional scaling support is missing in 46.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/magpie/+bug/2060659/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060659] Re: X11 fractional scaling support is missing in 46.0
** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: magpie (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060659 Title: X11 fractional scaling support is missing in 46.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/magpie/+bug/2060659/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062418] Re: gedit ships obsolete /usr/bin/gnome-text-editor alternative
** Changed in: gedit (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062418 Title: gedit ships obsolete /usr/bin/gnome-text-editor alternative To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/2062418/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061687] Re: Snapshot doesn't work until camera is unplugged and plugged back in
** Description changed: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS Beta On multiple computers, it appears like Snapshot doesn't work until I either: - unplug the external USB webcam and plug it back in - use the Fn key to disable the internal webcam and re-enable it I have reported this issue upstream + + Workaround + -- + In a terminal run + systemctl --user restart wireplumber.service ** Also affects: wireplumber (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: wireplumber (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: wireplumber (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Description changed: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS Beta On multiple computers, it appears like Snapshot doesn't work until I either: - unplug the external USB webcam and plug it back in - use the Fn key to disable the internal webcam and re-enable it + - or use a more complex method for internal webcams that don't have a hardware button to disable and enable them I have reported this issue upstream Workaround -- In a terminal run systemctl --user restart wireplumber.service -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061687 Title: Snapshot doesn't work until camera is unplugged and plugged back in To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/pipewire/+bug/2061687/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061566] Re: Changing fonts in Noble doesn't work anymore
** Changed in: gnome-tweaks (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged ** Changed in: gnome-tweaks (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Tags added: noble ** Also affects: gnome-tweaks via https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-tweaks/-/issues/482 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: gnome-tweaks (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061566 Title: Changing fonts in Noble doesn't work anymore To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-tweaks/+bug/2061566/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
