Re: [Bug 12637] Re: LCD Brightness on Laptop Always Set Very Low at Boot

2008-10-30 Thread Johnny Jelinek IV
Well this one must be quite a bugger because it's taken this long to
tackle.

On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 3:15 AM, Bertilo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Won't fix Why?

 --
 LCD Brightness on Laptop Always Set Very Low at Boot
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12637
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of a duplicate bug.


-- 
LCD Brightness on Laptop Always Set Very Low at Boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12637
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 12637] Re: LCD Brightness on Laptop Always Set Very Low at Boot

2008-06-08 Thread Johnny Jelinek IV
Wow, it's taken a little over 2 years to just propose a workable solution.
Very nice work chourave.

On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 4:29 AM, Bertilo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 echo blacklist video | sudo tee -a /etc/modprobe.d/local works for me
 too. The dimming is gone, but so is the functionality of my brightness
 controls. But I only ever used them to get the brightness up to max
 anyway, so I'm happy for now. Thank's a lot, chourave!

 --
 LCD Brightness on Laptop Always Set Very Low at Boot
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12637
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of a duplicate bug.



** Attachment added: unnamed
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15124472/unnamed

-- 
LCD Brightness on Laptop Always Set Very Low at Boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12637
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 12637] Re: LCD Brightness on Laptop Always Set Very Low at Boot

2008-04-21 Thread Johnny Jelinek IV
This is primarily with the 64-bit version.

On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 5:59 PM, encompass [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Very interesting... but I don't remember having this issue in the last
 version of ubuntu. 7.04 or 7.10.  This is a very new thing to me.  i
 should check with perhap installing an old version of ubuntu and see
 if it gives the issue.  Thanks for the information.

 On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 1:28 AM, ajole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I have a 20 iMac and have not yet installed any operating system but OS
 10.5, which is an upgrade from the 10.4 it had when new.  I thought you
 folks might be interested to know, this bug is affecting my machine even
 without Ubuntu, as well as several others I know of personally, and if you
 google it, a lot of folks around the Mac world.  I have tried the unplug it
 and wait, then plug it in and boot method, which didn't work.  I then tried
 the Zap the P-RAM method which didn't work either.  My tech folks are
 telling me to try the zap method 5 times in a row and see if that works.
   Regardless, just wanted you to know this bug may not be an OS issue at
 all.
 
 
 
   --
   LCD Brightness on Laptop Always Set Very Low at Boot
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12637
   You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
   of the bug.
 

 --
 LCD Brightness on Laptop Always Set Very Low at Boot
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12637
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of a duplicate bug.



** Attachment added: unnamed
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13776564/unnamed

-- 
LCD Brightness on Laptop Always Set Very Low at Boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12637
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 12637] Re: LCD Brightness on Laptop Always Set Very Low at Boot

2008-02-13 Thread Johnny Jelinek IV
So you believe it's all kernel's fault?  Can you verify it works with Ubuntu
8.04 Alpha 64 along with Kubuntu or should I pop out some CD's?  Thanks
Richard!!

On Feb 13, 2008 1:38 AM, Richard Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Here's some more info.  I went to system/administration/services, and
 disabled gdm, thinking I'd reboot to a console, just to see if this was a
 kernel problem, or possibly an xorg problem, since it's happening just
 milliseconds before the screen blanks to switch to X.
  Well, that wasn't clean at all!  it kills gdm immediately, which blew
 away my X session, as well as all the apps running, leaving me at a very
 ugly console with a huge font, reminiscent of my old commodore VIC-20.
 I managed to reboot, and it did come up without X, but with the same ugly
 huge font, so I only saw about 10 lines of text, and my prompt was somewhere
 below the bottom of the screen, so I was typing blind.
  ...but the important part is that the screen dimmed, so this is
 definitely NOT an X issue, it's in the kernel.  I also focussed my eyes at
 the top of the screen during the boot, and I was able to see that the [PCI}
 allocation... error that was displayed there came up DIM, just before the
 screen blanks, so the actual sequence is something like this:
 'Kernel is alive'
 'kernel mapping tables...'
 (backlight goes to dim)
 '[PCI] allocation'...

 rant
 Once I logged in at the console, I ran startx, and was able to get my
 desktop.  I again went to system/administration/services and re-enabled gdm,
 which AGAIN took immediate action, which in this case tried to start a
 second X server, which failed once, but eventually succeeded (as :1),
 leaving me at the gdm prompt.  I have no idea which virtual console I was
 on, but ctrl-alt-f7 got me back to the X session.  I probably should file a
 bug elswhere for this usability issue...  Or just go back to school.  In
 this new age of upstart, how do I cleanly do a one-time reboot to a normal
 console?  On my old redhat or suse systems, I always had runlevel 3, but I
 discovered a while back that in ubuntu runlevel 3 is the same as runlevel 5,
 and now with upstart, I have no idea if 'runlevels' even exist anymore, and
 if they do, how to configure and specify them?
  System/administration/services certainly has no visible 'runlevel-like'
 distinctions, /etc/inittab is gone  grrr...
  There is no 'upstart' directory under /etc.  There is no upstart manpage.
  Where do I look for clues?  `man init` is still there. scroll to the
 bottom, its author is Scott James Remnant.  So he calls the project upstart,
 but the binary is still init, just to confuse us, right?
  OK, the manpage mentions /etc/event.d.  Go browse...  rc-default seems to
 fall thru to runlevel 2.  Looking at the /etc/rcn.d directories, I find that
 runlevel 1 would not start X, but all others 2 - 5 do.  So I can probably
 edit one of those other directories to create a multiuser without X
 runlevel, but I still don't know how to pass a one-time parm thru grub to
 select that level.  More studying to do, and I'm tired.  I'm going to bed
 now...
 /rant

 --
 LCD Brightness on Laptop Always Set Very Low at Boot
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12637
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of a duplicate bug.


-- 
LCD Brightness on Laptop Always Set Very Low at Boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12637
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 17216] Re: Hard drive spindown should be configurable

2007-11-04 Thread Johnny Jelinek IV
 * the output of $sudo smartctl -a /dev/hda

$ sudo smartctl -a /dev/hda
smartctl version 5.37 [i686-pc-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-6 Bruce Allen
Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/

=== START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
Model Family: Hitachi Travelstar 80GN family
Device Model: IC25N060ATMR04-0
Serial Number:MRG308K3HY50SH
Firmware Version: MO3OAD4A
User Capacity:60,011,642,880 bytes
Device is:In smartctl database [for details use: -P show]
ATA Version is:   6
ATA Standard is:  ATA/ATAPI-6 T13 1410D revision 3a
Local Time is:Sun Nov  4 08:59:05 2007 CST
SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
SMART support is: Enabled

=== START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED

General SMART Values:
Offline data collection status:  (0x00) Offline data collection activity
was never started.
Auto Offline Data Collection: Disabled.
Self-test execution status:  (   0) The previous self-test routine completed
without error or no self-test has ever 
been run.
Total time to complete Offline 
data collection: ( 645) seconds.
Offline data collection
capabilities:(0x5b) SMART execute Offline immediate.
Auto Offline data collection on/off 
support.
Suspend Offline collection upon new
command.
Offline surface scan supported.
Self-test supported.
No Conveyance Self-test supported.
Selective Self-test supported.
SMART capabilities:(0x0003) Saves SMART data before entering
power-saving mode.
Supports SMART auto save timer.
Error logging capability:(0x01) Error logging supported.
General Purpose Logging supported.
Short self-test routine 
recommended polling time:(   2) minutes.
Extended self-test routine
recommended polling time:(  53) minutes.

SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 16
Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds:
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME  FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE  UPDATED  
WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
  1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000b   100   100   062Pre-fail  Always   
-   0
  2 Throughput_Performance  0x0005   100   100   040Pre-fail  Offline  
-   0
  3 Spin_Up_Time0x0007   170   170   033Pre-fail  Always   
-   1
  4 Start_Stop_Count0x0012   099   099   000Old_age   Always   
-   2133
  5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct   0x0033   100   100   005Pre-fail  Always   
-   0
  7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000b   100   100   067Pre-fail  Always   
-   0
  8 Seek_Time_Performance   0x0005   100   100   040Pre-fail  Offline  
-   0
  9 Power_On_Hours  0x0012   066   066   000Old_age   Always   
-   15100
 10 Spin_Retry_Count0x0013   100   100   060Pre-fail  Always   
-   0
 12 Power_Cycle_Count   0x0032   099   099   000Old_age   Always   
-   1606
191 G-Sense_Error_Rate  0x000a   096   096   000Old_age   Always   
-   589824
192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032   100   100   000Old_age   Always   
-   86
193 Load_Cycle_Count0x0012   055   055   000Old_age   Always   
-   455567
194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0002   125   125   000Old_age   Always   
-   44 (Lifetime Min/Max 4/66)
196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032   100   100   000Old_age   Always   
-   11
197 Current_Pending_Sector  0x0022   100   100   000Old_age   Always   
-   4
198 Offline_Uncorrectable   0x0008   100   100   000Old_age   Offline  
-   0
199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count0x000a   200   200   000Old_age   Always   
-   0

SMART Error Log Version: 1
ATA Error Count: 14 (device log contains only the most recent five errors)
CR = Command Register [HEX]
FR = Features Register [HEX]
SC = Sector Count Register [HEX]
SN = Sector Number Register [HEX]
CL = Cylinder Low Register [HEX]
CH = Cylinder High Register [HEX]
DH = Device/Head Register [HEX]
DC = Device Command Register [HEX]
ER = Error register [HEX]
ST = Status register [HEX]
Powered_Up_Time is measured from power on, and printed as
DDd+hh:mm:SS.sss where DD=days, hh=hours, mm=minutes,
SS=sec, and sss=millisec. It wraps after 49.710 days.

Error 14 occurred at disk power-on lifetime: 8465 hours (352 days + 17 

Re: [Bug 40700] Re: 16:9 aspect ratios have corrupt display [Dapper Beta]

2007-10-19 Thread Johnny Jelinek IV
It works out of the box for me :D, but -- The splash screen didn't work
after the liveCD install.  I had to manually edit entries to get usplash to
work properly (basically, it automatically configured for 1280x1024, when my
laptop can only do 1280x800).  This also adds time to booting up, I don't
know why.

On 10/19/07, Bryce Harrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 It's been a few weeks without response.  I think this is likely fixed in
 Gutsy, but if someone could please test Gutsy final, please reopen if
 the issue still exists.

 ** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Fix Released

 --
 16:9 aspect ratios have corrupt display [Dapper Beta]
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/40700
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.


-- 
16:9 aspect ratios have corrupt display [Dapper Beta]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/40700
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 12637] Re: LCD Brightness on Laptop Always Set Very Low at Boot

2007-03-01 Thread Johnny Jelinek IV
it still happens on my m6805.

On 2/28/07, Richard Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Bug confirmed still present on emachines M6810 with kernel 2.6.20-9 x86_64
 (Feisty herd 4+)
 AMD Athlon 64 3200+; ATI Radeon mobility 9600
   Just before it dimms, the graphical screen is replaced by a text screen,
 and I see the words 'Kernel is Active' briefly appear at the bottom.

 --
 LCD Brightness on Laptop Always Set Very Low at Boot
 https://launchpad.net/bugs/12637


-- 
LCD Brightness on Laptop Always Set Very Low at Boot
https://launchpad.net/bugs/12637

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 61544] Re: random freezes

2006-10-22 Thread Johnny Jelinek IV
I also have random freezes .. I've attached my bug report from edgy RC.

** Attachment added: crash
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/4923548/_usr_bin_banshee.1000.crash

-- 
random freezes
https://launchpad.net/bugs/61544

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 57951] Re: xchat crashes frequently on quit

2006-09-18 Thread Johnny Jelinek IV
popup notifier said to upload this :D

** Attachment added: Xchat crash
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/4296967/_usr_bin_xchat.1000.crash

-- 
xchat crashes frequently on quit
https://launchpad.net/bugs/57951

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 40700] Re: 16:9 aspect ratios not working Edgy Knot 3

2006-09-17 Thread Johnny Jelinek IV
I am once again plagued by this curse -- out of box.

I'll follow the steps you've requested momentarily, have a look at the
current view though :( Screenshot provided!

** Attachment added: The horrid view on my laptop at 1280x800 (16:9 aspect 
ratio)
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/4292195/Screenshot.png

-- 
16:9 aspect ratios not working Dapper Beta
https://launchpad.net/bugs/40700

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 40700] Re: 16:9 aspect ratios not working Edgy Knot 3

2006-09-17 Thread Johnny Jelinek IV
I've included my xorg.conf file after the xserver-xorg reconfigure (this
caused my laptop's scroll wheel to work!! :D!


** Attachment added: reconfigured xorg.conf
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/4292208/xorg.conf

-- 
16:9 aspect ratios not working Dapper Beta
https://launchpad.net/bugs/40700

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 40700] Re: 16:9 aspect ratios not working Edgy Knot 3

2006-09-17 Thread Johnny Jelinek IV
DebuggingXAutoconfiguration

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lspci -n
00:00.0 0600: 1106:3188 (rev 01)
00:01.0 0604: 1106:b188
00:0a.0 0607: 1524:1410
00:0c.0 0280: 14e4:4320 (rev 03)
00:10.0 0c03: 1106:3038 (rev 80)
00:10.1 0c03: 1106:3038 (rev 80)
00:10.2 0c03: 1106:3038 (rev 80)
00:10.3 0c03: 1106:3104 (rev 82)
00:11.0 0601: 1106:3177
00:11.1 0101: 1106:0571 (rev 06)
00:11.5 0401: 1106:3059 (rev 50)
00:11.6 0780: 1106:3068 (rev 80)
00:12.0 0200: 1106:3065 (rev 74)
00:13.0 0c00: 1106:3044 (rev 80)
00:18.0 0600: 1022:1100
00:18.1 0600: 1022:1101
00:18.2 0600: 1022:1102
00:18.3 0600: 1022:1103
01:00.0 0300: 1002:4e50

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo discover 
--disable=parallel,serial,usb,ide,scsi,pcmcia --format=%S\t%D\n video
discover: Bus not found.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo xresprobe ati
id:
res: 1280x800
freq:
disptype: lcd/lvds

What went wrong:

In Breezy, my resolution was nicely 1280x800.  Ever since the
autoconfiguration option was implemented for which resolutions should be
available, it automatically chooses 1024x768 by default and when
choosing 1280x800, the entire screen looks messed up and garbled.  I
don't understand why this has changed.

** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/4292207/Xorg.0.log

-- 
16:9 aspect ratios not working Dapper Beta
https://launchpad.net/bugs/40700

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 40700] Re: 16:9 aspect ratios not working Edgy Knot 3

2006-09-17 Thread Johnny Jelinek IV
This is my original xorg.conf that comes right after a fresh install of
Edgy Knot 3.

** Attachment added: xorg.conf-backup
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/4292209/xorg.conf.20060917190901

-- 
16:9 aspect ratios not working Dapper Beta
https://launchpad.net/bugs/40700

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 40700] Re: 16:9 aspect ratios not working Edgy Knot 3

2006-09-17 Thread Johnny Jelinek IV
Also, a sidenote: after rebooting post xorg-reconfigure, the screen
began flashing a whole bunch and freakin' out.  When I did CTRL+ALT+1 to
go to terminal, I lost full visibility because text was moving and going
crazy.  When I would go back to GNOME, the whole screen was glitchy and
colorful.  Constantly moving, gave me motion sickness :O *barf*

Anyway, let me know if you need anymore information!  I'd love to be
more assistance (I hope it'll benefit me in the future!)

-- 
16:9 aspect ratios not working Dapper Beta
https://launchpad.net/bugs/40700

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 40700] Re: [Bug 40700] Re: 16:9 aspect ratios not working Dapper Beta

2006-08-31 Thread Johnny Jelinek IV
would you like me to follow the steps with Dapper 6.06.1 or with Edgy Knot
1?

On 8/23/06, Rodrigo Novo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Johnny, thanks for the bug report!

 Unfortunately it is a little too vague to be helpful, right now. Please
 take a look at
 https://help.ubuntu.com/community/DebuggingXAutoconfiguration, and
 follow the steps provided there, if at all possible. We would also
 appreciate immensely if you could attach the relevant logs/outputs
 mentioned in the wiki page, into this bug report.

 I'm also marking the bug as 'needs info', for now.

 ** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed = Needs Info

 --
 16:9 aspect ratios not working Dapper Beta
 https://launchpad.net/bugs/40700


-- 
16:9 aspect ratios not working Dapper Beta
https://launchpad.net/bugs/40700

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs