[Bug 1442568] Re: Docker causes a segfault when starting containers
The duplicate link has been removed. ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of private bug 1441038 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1442568 Title: Docker causes a segfault when starting containers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aufs-tools/+bug/1442568/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1560589] [NEW] Bogus alignment i915_bpo
Public bug reported: When using Intel Skylake Graphics the dmesg logs send the message "i915_bpo :00:02.0: BAR 6: [??? 0x flags 0x2] has bogus alignment" every couple of minutes. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.99.917+git20160218-1ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-15.31-generic 4.4.6 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-15-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Tue Mar 22 12:24:21 2016 InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-03-14 (8 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Alpha amd64 (20160307) SourcePackage: xserver-xorg-video-intel UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: linux-lts-xenial (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug xenial ** Package changed: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) => linux-lts- xenial (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1560589 Title: Bogus alignment i915_bpo To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-xenial/+bug/1560589/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1560587] [NEW] Redshift-GTK segfaults after opening and closing.
Public bug reported: After leaving redshift-gtk open for an extended period and then opening info it displays no info. After closing and reopening (or trying to) redshift-gtk will segfault because of GTK3. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: redshift-gtk 1.10-5ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-15.31-generic 4.4.6 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-15-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Tue Mar 22 12:14:21 2016 InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-03-14 (8 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Alpha amd64 (20160307) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: redshift UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: redshift (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1560587 Title: Redshift-GTK segfaults after opening and closing. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/redshift/+bug/1560587/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1560029] [NEW] Context and File menus show up under the video making them non-visible.
Public bug reported: When playing any type of video on an Skylake CPU with Intel graphics (open-source) with or without acceleration VLC (and many othe applications) show the context and file menus under the video making them invisible to the user even though technically they are there just under the video. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: vlc 2.2.2-4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-14.30-generic 4.4.5 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-14-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64 CurrentDesktop: Unity Date: Mon Mar 21 08:13:17 2016 InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-03-14 (7 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Alpha amd64 (20160307) SourcePackage: vlc UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: vlc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1560029 Title: Context and File menus show up under the video making them non- visible. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/1560029/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1521173] Re: AER: Corrected error received: id=00e0
I still get this problem in Xenial as well... randomly but it happens. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1521173 Title: AER: Corrected error received: id=00e0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1521173/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1306901] Re: jitsi crashes when receiving a call
It should be noted that the link above my comment that claims that it's stable download, it's not stable, and 2.5 has lots of UI issues on Ubuntu which have not been addressed (as of my last testing) so be prepared if you plan to use 2.5. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1306901 Title: jitsi crashes when receiving a call To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jitsi/+bug/1306901/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1325708] Re: Error in `/usr/sbin/gpartedbin': malloc(): smallbin double linked list corrupted: 0x000000000107d210
I mean parted* sorry. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1325708 Title: Error in `/usr/sbin/gpartedbin': malloc(): smallbin double linked list corrupted: 0x0107d210 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gparted/+bug/1325708/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1325708] Re: Error in `/usr/sbin/gpartedbin': malloc(): smallbin double linked list corrupted: 0x000000000107d210
This error is actually caused by libparted even though it claims to originate from gparted as the same error can happen in fat32. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1325708 Title: Error in `/usr/sbin/gpartedbin': malloc(): smallbin double linked list corrupted: 0x0107d210 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gparted/+bug/1325708/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1314964] [NEW] vlc 100% cpu usage when file doesn't exist
Public bug reported: When opening VLC from the command line and being unable to find the file VLC will consume 100% of the CPU usage and retry-reopening it over and over again consuming 100% of the CPU. This can be replicated on Ubuntu 14.04. --- VLC media player 2.1.2 Rincewind (revision 2.1.2-0-ga4c4876) VLC version 2.1.2 Rincewind (2.1.2-0-ga4c4876) Compiled by buildd on orlo.buildd (Mar 24 2014 06:18:54) Compiler: gcc version 4.8.2 (Ubuntu 4.8.2-17ubuntu1) This program comes with NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. You may redistribute it under the terms of the GNU General Public License; see the file named COPYING for details. Written by the VideoLAN team; see the AUTHORS file. ** Affects: vlc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314964 Title: vlc 100% cpu usage when file doesn't exist To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/1314964/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1314964] Re: vlc 100% cpu usage when file doesn't exist
ii libvlc5 2.1.2-2build2 amd64multimedia player and streamer library ii libvlccore7 2.1.2-2build2 amd64base library for VLC and its modules ii phonon-backend-vlc:amd64 0.7.1-1ubuntu3 amd64Phonon VLC backend ii vlc 2.1.2-2build2 amd64multimedia player and streamer ii vlc-data 2.1.2-2build2 all Common data for VLC ii vlc-nox 2.1.2-2build2 amd64multimedia player and streamer (without X support) Maybe it's related to my SSD and the fact it can go a million miles an hour? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314964 Title: vlc 100% cpu usage when file doesn't exist To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/1314964/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1314964] Re: vlc 100% cpu usage when file doesn't exist
Indeed it looks to be related to the repeat feature as that fixed it, but I don't know if that is expected behavior as software should behave and this doesn't seem like behaving, could this behavior not be adjusted so that if it detects a single file with a missing over and over again it does not consume the all the CPU and instead just stops? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314964 Title: vlc 100% cpu usage when file doesn't exist To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/1314964/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1314964] Re: vlc 100% cpu usage when file doesn't exist
Fair enough, I can actually agree with that logic. ** Changed in: vlc (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314964 Title: vlc 100% cpu usage when file doesn't exist To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/1314964/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1279412] Re: Xorg crashed with SIGABRT in xdl_xs115_atiddxPixmapIsTypeOf()
Can't tell if trolling because nothing is stopping you from opening VLC and disabling overlay video for the time being. Stop trying to open it with a video and you wouldn't have it crashing your X while trying to fix the problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1279412 Title: Xorg crashed with SIGABRT in xdl_xs115_atiddxPixmapIsTypeOf() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer/+bug/1279412/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1281091] Re: Xorg crashed with SIGABRT in xdl_xs115_atiddxPixmapIsTypeOf()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1279412 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1279412 Thank you for taking the time to help Ubuntu and for reporting this bug, but I believe this bug is a duplicate of #1279412 so I have marked it as so. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1279412 Xorg crashed with SIGABRT in xdl_xs115_atiddxPixmapIsTypeOf() -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1281091 Title: Xorg crashed with SIGABRT in xdl_xs115_atiddxPixmapIsTypeOf() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer/+bug/1281091/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 969860] Re: fglrx uses 100% CPU when screen turns off (spinning in glXWaitVideoSyncSGI or glXSwapBuffers)
This is an upstream bug, and it's been fixed in 13.1 so please either install 13.1 or wait until Ubuntu updates fglrx in the repository (even though they are practically the same -- minus a few differences -- if you build them.) ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/969860 Title: fglrx uses 100% CPU when screen turns off (spinning in glXWaitVideoSyncSGI or glXSwapBuffers) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/969860/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 969860] Re: fglrx uses 100% CPU when screen turns off (spinning in glXWaitVideoSyncSGI or glXSwapBuffers)
I forgot all about that until you had mentioned the 12.12 driver, for those of you who cannot wait you can get the 12.11 beta (which of course is the 12.12) and install it: http://support.amd.com/us/kbarticles/Pages/AMDCatalyst1211betadriver.aspx -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/969860 Title: fglrx uses 100% CPU when screen turns off (spinning in glXWaitVideoSyncSGI or glXSwapBuffers) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/969860/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 969860] Re: fglrx uses 100% CPU when screen turns off (spinning in glXWaitVideoSyncSGI or glXSwapBuffers)
Crap, I had a strong suspicion this was the case because I too didn't experience this bug in 12.10 but 12.10 did not really appeal to my tastes (because of some personal reasons that aren't necessary to this bug.) I don't remember if I ever mentioned that in another bug or not. Just as a side request if you could, can you please report the default settings for 12.10 for the settings you changed. I actually prefer to keep my desktop tearfree and knowing what those settings are by default in 12.10 will help me a long with plenty of others who want to keep tearfree. (I remember keeping tearfree enabled and not having the problem in 12.10 but the case might have changed since I tested it before Quantal was released and in beta1) Thanks for taking the time to look into this deeper, and I'm sorry if I sounded angry earlier, I just really wanted updates on the matter and you surely did provide updates that show me peeps care! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/969860 Title: fglrx uses 100% CPU when screen turns off (spinning in glXWaitVideoSyncSGI or glXSwapBuffers) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/969860/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1080722] Re: Immediate restart nearly forced by Update-Manager 12.10
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1033226 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1033226 Nearly is subjective IMO. While I think the behavior can/should change I don't think it's forced at all. Much like Windows it allows you to minimize it but it makes sure to (try and) keep itself inside your view so that you are reminded. One thing you have to admin is that unlike Windows at least it doesn't pop up every 4 hours (at maxmum) with a timer that restarts for you even if you are unaware causing you to lose work. Maybe take a mid-Windows style approach where a user can set a timer to remind them (as they are working) but unlike Windows don't have that timer have a timer that auto-restarts without your knowledge or telling it, I feel it's time to restart. I personally like that approach because more often than not I will want to be reminded (and the red gear icon hints at me too) but I don't want to be reminded while I'm working, but if it pops up anytime while I'm not working I would be more than happy to oblidge. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080722 Title: Immediate restart nearly forced by Update-Manager 12.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1080722/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 969860] Re: fglrx uses 100% CPU when screen turns off (spinning in glXWaitVideoSyncSGI or glXSwapBuffers)
Why is this constantly being pushed? And being pushed at all, this is a pretty critical issue that breaks quite a few laptops, I don't even understand why you would ignore an issue like this and push it instead of making it a top priority issue... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/969860 Title: fglrx uses 100% CPU when screen turns off (spinning in glXWaitVideoSyncSGI or glXSwapBuffers) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/969860/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 969860] Re: fglrx uses 100% CPU when screen turns off (spinning in glXWaitVideoSyncSGI or glXSwapBuffers)
While we're at it, can anyone update us on the status of this bug in Precise? When I tested it on Quantal it was working exactly as intended with no side-affects like this so I'm wondering if there are plans to fix this soon? Since it seems like it didn't make it into the point. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/969860 Title: fglrx uses 100% CPU when screen turns off (spinning in glXWaitVideoSyncSGI or glXSwapBuffers) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/969860/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1016724] Re: Laptop brightness always reverts to maximum on 12.04
I don't know if this is related or not but this might not be a GNOME bug, this might actually be a Kernel bug with HP's as on my system the Kernel reports that it is unable to obtain the brightness with the message [Firmware Bug]: ACPI: No _BQC method, cannot determine initial brightness -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016724 Title: Laptop brightness always reverts to maximum on 12.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1016724/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1025418] Re: Using ProxyCommand w/a non-existant host results in infinite spawns.
@racb Setting aside the fact that you think I don't know how to configure a server or prevent it, the faulty logic is that because you can fork bomb already this problem doesn't matter and it's not worth it yeah? I don't know if that's funny or what... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1025418 Title: Using ProxyCommand w/a non-existant host results in infinite spawns. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1025418/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1025418] Re: Using ProxyCommand w/a non-existant host results in infinite spawns.
@racb Setting aside the fact that you think I don't know how to configure a server or prevent it, the faulty logic is that because you can fork bomb already this problem doesn't matter and it's not worth it yeah? I don't know if that's funny or what... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1025418 Title: Using ProxyCommand w/a non-existant host results in infinite spawns. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1025418/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1025418] Re: Using ProxyCommand with a non-existant URL results in infinite spawns.
** Attachment added: Screenshot from 2012-07-16 13:34:04.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1025418/+attachment/3225301/+files/Screenshot%20from%202012-07-16%2013%3A34%3A04.png ** Visibility changed to: Public ** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1025418 Title: Using ProxyCommand w/a non-existant host results in infinite spawns. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1025418/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1025418] Re: Using ProxyCommand with a non-existant host results in infinite spawns.
** Summary changed: - Using ProxyCommand with a non-existant URL results in infinite spawns. + Using ProxyCommand with a non-existant host results in infinite spawns. ** Summary changed: - Using ProxyCommand with a non-existant host results in infinite spawns. + Using ProxyCommand w/a non-existant host results in infinite spawns. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1025418 Title: Using ProxyCommand w/a non-existant host results in infinite spawns. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1025418/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1025418] Re: Using ProxyCommand with a non-existant URL results in infinite spawns.
** Attachment added: Screenshot from 2012-07-16 13:34:04.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1025418/+attachment/3225301/+files/Screenshot%20from%202012-07-16%2013%3A34%3A04.png ** Visibility changed to: Public ** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1025418 Title: Using ProxyCommand w/a non-existant host results in infinite spawns. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1025418/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1025418] Re: Using ProxyCommand with a non-existant host results in infinite spawns.
** Summary changed: - Using ProxyCommand with a non-existant URL results in infinite spawns. + Using ProxyCommand with a non-existant host results in infinite spawns. ** Summary changed: - Using ProxyCommand with a non-existant host results in infinite spawns. + Using ProxyCommand w/a non-existant host results in infinite spawns. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1025418 Title: Using ProxyCommand w/a non-existant host results in infinite spawns. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1025418/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 754508] Re: Modal dialogs don't appear on the workspace of their parent window
As a work around for some people you can install compizconfig-settings- manager and go into the General Options then hit up display settings and disable smart-mode. Although I assume this fix only works for people with different monitors with different resolutions (such as the people like me who had 1366 and then a 1080p tv connected to the HDMI.) I set mine to put everything new into the smaller window (my laptop screen) and it started placing all the dialogs and new windows into the right place. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/754508 Title: Modal dialogs don't appear on the workspace of their parent window To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/754508/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1016724] Re: Laptop brightness always reverts to maximum on 12.04
This bug affects all my G series and Envy series HP laptops, as well as my Dell. They all either have an AMD APU (all my HP laptops) or an i5 (the Dell). We had the same problem back in 11.10. There is one thing in common between all my laptops and that's that they all have 7 series graphics, even my favorite (the A4 has discrete 7 series with 6 series on the die.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016724 Title: Laptop brightness always reverts to maximum on 12.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1016724/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 986147] Re: openssl 1.0.1-4ubuntu2 breaks a bunch of ciphers
openssl s_client -showcerts -connect d3vwyrdyja2n00.cloudfront.net:443 - Fails openssl s_client -showcerts -tls1 -connect d3vwyrdyja2n00.cloudfront.net:443 - Works ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986147 Title: openssl 1.0.1-4ubuntu2 breaks a bunch of ciphers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/986147/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 925895] Re: Ambiance sub-menus light like Radiance after latest light-themes update.
Please do not update my description as that is the description that affected me if you are having something similar but different add your own comment, do not update mine as if I am having the same issue. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925895 Title: Ambiance sub-menus light like Radiance after latest light-themes update. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/light-themes/+bug/925895/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 925895] Re: Ambiance sub-menus light like Radiance after latest light-themes update.
Nobody cares what you believe. A persons attitude and opinion (read opinion, you know what that means yes?) does not dictate whether a bug is legit or not. Go see a shrink if you have personal problems with a way a person acts and don't close a legit bug because you have issues with the way people are talking. This is NOT your bug, and you are NOT the developer. You are just being an asshole now, just like we were, actually at this point, you are no better than us, and maybe even worse, but I don't just people like you and get butt hurt and start closing bugs for no reason just because I 'had a problem with the way people are talking'. Get the fuck over yourself. ** Changed in: light-themes (Ubuntu Precise) Status: Invalid = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925895 Title: Ambiance sub-menus light like Radiance after latest light-themes update. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/light-themes/+bug/925895/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 925895] Re: Ambiance sub-menus light like Radiance after latest light-themes update.
Ubuntu looks like trash with a white menu on a dark theme regardless of where it is placed or where it is sourced from or whatever the justification is. It's an ignorant design decision and any designer who would stand for such an ugly mark should not be designing. I know I'm being harsh here but this is clearly the work of somebody who knows nothing about /real/ design, or who likes to cause people eyestrain, or who likes to troll. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925895 Title: Ambiance sub-menus light like Radiance after latest light-themes update. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/light-themes/+bug/925895/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 925895] Re: Ambiance sub-menus light like Radiance after latest light-themes update.
Don't mark a bug as invalid just because you think you can. This bug is still affecting people and there are still issues going on regardless of the bad design decision there are still obvious bugs. I find it ironic you call somebody rude and then go and do something like that. ** Changed in: light-themes (Ubuntu Precise) Status: Invalid = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925895 Title: Ambiance sub-menus light like Radiance after latest light-themes update. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/light-themes/+bug/925895/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 925895] Re: Ambiance sub-menus light like Radiance after latest light-themes update.
Who in their right mind decided that light right click menus was good taste? Is the goal to punish users who spend most of their lives in a dark terminal? To punish programmers? To punish anybody who doesn't like such contrasting design decisions? I just don't understand who could have approved such a decision and where this false sense of good design came from. Seriously what is going on over there? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925895 Title: Ambiance sub-menus light like Radiance after latest light-themes update. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/light-themes/+bug/925895/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 925895] Re: Ambiance sub-menus light like Radiance after latest light-themes update.
@andrea so just one question. Will the final goal be that dark sources create dark context menus and light sources create light context menus? If that's the case I'm down for that but the only thing that is catching me as possibly eye fracturing is the possible white context menu on dark places (even websites count here.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925895 Title: Ambiance sub-menus light like Radiance after latest light-themes update. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/light-themes/+bug/925895/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926144] Re: Unity Launcher Icons are black
This is more than likely a Unity compiz-plugin issue and I'll have to look at your and my logs more but this is certainly confirmed and it's confirmed that the fix is to set the colour to anything but RGB 0,0,0 (example: I used 1, 1, 1 and could set the opacity to anything above 50 and it would work right -- anything below would result in white.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926144 Title: Unity Launcher Icons are black To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/926144/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 926144] Re: Unity Launcher Icons are black
@om26er RGB(0, 0, 0), set the transparency to 10. Bug Recreated. Screenie attached. ** Attachment added: screenshot#2012-02-04#05:10:42.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/926144/+attachment/2713272/+files/screenshot%232012-02-04%2305%3A10%3A42.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926144 Title: Unity Launcher Icons are black To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/926144/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 925895] Re: Ambiance menus light like Radiance after latest light-themes update.
@fitoschido I don't quite understand what you are on about? You experience the bug (but not in the indicator but in other menus -- not realising that I /didn't/ imply it only happens to indicator) yet you don't acknowledge this as a bug? Or am I missing something entirely in your statement? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925895 Title: Ambiance menus light like Radiance after latest light-themes update. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-themes/+bug/925895/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 925895] Re: Ambiance menus light like Radiance after latest light-themes update.
@fitoschido There is a difference between bright and white (and when it comes to good monitors -- like the one I have -- you can see every step of black they use -- really well.) I would not personally see a white menu or even a 'bright' menu on a black theme any valid design decision, it's bad enough that the gradients changed in 11.04 and look bad now (IMNSHO, but not bad enough to make me complain) and that the orange is not dark enough on the blacks they use but now you want to justify a white or bright menu? You can't justify such a change like you can a badly selected orange or a badly made gradient. Though, I wouldn't fight them making a high-contrast Ambiance and a low- contrast ambiance, one that well make menus brighter and uses a bad orange and one that lowers the tones of the menus and makes the orange darker and more subtle on the blacks and even uses a subtle gray for the nautilus background (making it less eye straining.) I wish I knew enough about GTK theming to do it and contribute to this area, but alas no time :( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925895 Title: Ambiance menus light like Radiance after latest light-themes update. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-themes/+bug/925895/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 925895] [NEW] Ambiance menus light like Radiance after latest light-themes update.
Public bug reported: After the latest light-themes update today the menus for Ambiance are light as if they actually belong to Radiance. Some icons also end up having a orange box as a background as well but that's an entirely different bug. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu precise (development branch) Release: 12.04 Codename: precise ** Affects: light-themes (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925895 Title: Ambiance menus light like Radiance after latest light-themes update. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-themes/+bug/925895/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 925895] Re: Ambiance menus light like Radiance after latest light-themes update.
** Attachment added: screenshot_at#2012-02-03#01:17:51.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925895/+attachment/2709430/+files/screenshot_at%232012-02-03%2301%3A17%3A51.png ** Description changed: After the latest light-themes update today the menus for Ambiance are - light as if they actually belong to Radiance. + light as if they actually belong to Radiance. Some icons also end up + having a orange box as a background as well but that's an entirely + different bug. + + Distributor ID: Ubuntu + Description: Ubuntu precise (development branch) + Release: 12.04 + Codename: precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925895 Title: Ambiance menus light like Radiance after latest light-themes update. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-themes/+bug/925895/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 916806] Re: file-roller crashes with CTRL+click on items in archive
** Changed in: file-roller (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916806 Title: file-roller crashes with CTRL+click on items in archive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/916806/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 917830] Re: Breadcrumbs using light background color unless focused or hovered over with cursor
I just checked out the development branch (http://bazaar.launchpad.net /~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/precise/light-themes/precise/revision/46) and this problem is still going on unless I am missing something special. Is there some hidden branch I'm not seeing? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917830 Title: Breadcrumbs using light background color unless focused or hovered over with cursor To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-themes/+bug/917830/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 879960] Re: Impossible to get contact list visible in Unity after reboot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 879950 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/879950 Everyone, please do not post your 'this fix worked for me' and 'this bug also affects me and here is why it matters', there is a button for that, also: please next time merge the newer bug into the older, it seems odd that the other bug jumped into the future just to be a duplicate of this one. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 879950 pidgin not showing up -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/879960 Title: Impossible to get contact list visible in Unity after reboot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pidgin/+bug/879960/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 879950] Re: pidgin not showing up
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 879960 Impossible to get contact list visible in Unity after reboot -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/879950 Title: pidgin not showing up To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pidgin/+bug/879950/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 916806] Re: file-roller crashes with CTRL+click on items in archive
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916806 Title: file-roller crashes with CTRL+click on items in archive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/916806/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 919721] [NEW] Date misplaces year with default formatting.
Public bug reported: Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu precise (development branch) Release: 12.04 Codename: precise Command: date Package: coreutils What happened: Sat Jan 21 10:44:14 CST 2012 What I expected to happen: Sat, Jan 21, 2012. 10:44:14 CST (or similar formatting) When running the date command the year is misplaced after the time. ** Affects: date (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu precise (development branch) Release: 12.04 Codename: precise Command: date What happened: Sat Jan 21 10:44:14 CST 2012 What I expected to happen: Sat, Jan 21, 2012. 10:44:14 CST (or similar formatting) - When running the date command the year is misplaced after the time for - some strange reason. + When running the date command the year is misplaced after the time. ** Description changed: Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu precise (development branch) Release: 12.04 Codename: precise Command: date + Package: coreutils What happened: Sat Jan 21 10:44:14 CST 2012 What I expected to happen: Sat, Jan 21, 2012. 10:44:14 CST (or similar formatting) - When running the date command the year is misplaced after the time. + When running the date command the year is misplaced after the time for + some strange reason. ** Description changed: Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu precise (development branch) Release: 12.04 Codename: precise Command: date Package: coreutils What happened: Sat Jan 21 10:44:14 CST 2012 What I expected to happen: Sat, Jan 21, 2012. 10:44:14 CST (or similar formatting) - When running the date command the year is misplaced after the time for - some strange reason. + When running the date command the year is misplaced after the time. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919721 Title: Date misplaces year with default formatting. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/date/+bug/919721/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 657901] Re: linux-virtual depends on wireless-crda
Just updating to say this is still a problem in Natty. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657901 Title: linux-virtual depends on wireless-crda To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/657901/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 815540] Re: Server becomes unresponsive after spawning 16 ksoftirqd processes
For now I'm going to mark this bug as incomplete since so far it seems like it could be a faulty drive, if you have any more information please feel free to post it and keep everyone updated so we can try to help you out further. Thanks. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815540 Title: Server becomes unresponsive after spawning 16 ksoftirqd processes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/815540/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 815540] Re: Server becomes unresponsive after spawning 16 ksoftirqd processes
Can we get a filtered dmesg for the failing server and a bootdmesg for both to compare? Your UFW is taking up valuable real estate in dmesg so it might be fitting to attach log outputs without all the UFW cruft if you can please. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815540 Title: Server becomes unresponsive after spawning 16 ksoftirqd processes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/815540/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 815540] Re: Server becomes unresponsive after spawning 16 ksoftirqd processes
I would much more prefer the output of dmesg |grep -v UFW and there should be indicators in dmesg unless there is a random race condition, but so far this seems like it might be the drive but we'll have to see some logs to make an informed guess on that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/815540 Title: Server becomes unresponsive after spawning 16 ksoftirqd processes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/815540/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 665944] Re: System takes too long to activate wifi on resume
Please attach a patch so that I might apply it and test it to report results. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665944 Title: System takes too long to activate wifi on resume To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/665944/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 722019] Re: Failed to install the bootloader
I haven't had a chance to look at the script yet, but after testing, it seems that using the switch --allow-system-internal you will be able to install the bootloader on a USB stick, I tested this with 11.04 making an 11.04 startup disk to a PNY stick. Would one of you who reported this also try to use that switch and confirm if it works for you? ** Changed in: usb-creator (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722019 Title: Failed to install the bootloader To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usb-creator/+bug/722019/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267715] Re: ndiswrapper -r should check its argument
This bug is far wider than the original submitter had originally assumed. After testing this bug for security (by recommendation) and validating it to see if it should be closed, I soon discovered I was able to delete /dev/null and /etc/ndiswrapper and any other directory I chose to delete using ndiswrapper -r. I have submitted this bug upstream as well as this is a security bug. https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3342097group_id=93482atid=604450 ** Bug watch added: SourceForge.net Tracker #3342097 http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=3342097 ** Changed in: ndiswrapper (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267715 Title: ndiswrapper -r should check its argument To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ndiswrapper/+bug/267715/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 789688] Re: UbuntuHashes doesn't contains SHA256
Belabela, Publicly editable does not mean it's insecure. The Wiki does keep track of all edits so that an audit can happen. By your theory the information you linked to on Wikipedia is insecure as well, because I can go and edit it freely and forge all kinds of information. HTTPS does not make an editable wiki more secure. Aside from that, you can also compare each version (edit.) You would need to compromise the back-end to the wiki to forge the edit, and even then an admin can go back and revert the edit and disclose the false edit warning the community at large that a compromise happened and that they should validate their ISO's if downloaded during that given time frame. To also note, everything on those mirrors is directly from Ubuntu, they do not create the sums themselves and Ubuntu provides sums, as you can clearly see here at http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/11.04/release/SHA256SUMS and http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/11.04/release/SHA1SUMS. As far as the HTTPS, my suggestion is that you create a separate bug for that and request that they add HTTPS to the CDIMAGE site. ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Opinion -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789688 Title: UbuntuHashes doesn't contains SHA256 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 672354] Re: [Maverick] History missing
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, we cannot work on this bug because your description didn't include enough information. You may find it helpful to read How to report bugs effectively http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html. We'd be grateful if you would then provide a more complete description and possibly an apport-collect, strace or backtrace of the potential problem. I am able to view 'the history' in Synaptic, as well as Ubuntu software Centre and via /var/log/dpkg.log. ** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- [Maverick] History missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/672354 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 672354] Re: [Maverick] History missing
Can we get a snapshot of /var/log/apt/history.log too if you don't mind so that we can see if apt stopped logging actions too and to determine if this is a bug in synaptics or a possible bug in apt. Thanks for helping us narrow this down. You should see something like: Start-Date: 2010-11-07 15:35:50 Commandline: /usr/sbin/synaptic Install: xul-ext-notify:amd64 (1.5.4-4build1) End-Date: 2010-11-07 15:35:54 -- [Maverick] History missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/672354 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 672354] Re: [Maverick] History missing
** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- [Maverick] History missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/672354 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 657901] Re: linux-virtual depends on wireless-crda
I have requested that this bug have an importance set since it is a confirmed bug, I experienced it today while configuring several of our new VM's on a new Xen server with PV-Grub. I was pretty surprised and intrigued it required it at all. It should really be a recommend not a requirement. -- linux-virtual depends on wireless-crda https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657901 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 665983] Re: package postgresql-8.4 8.4.5-0ubuntu10.04 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. However, at this time this bug lacks some basic information and is pretty general. Could you please try the following to see if we can get more information on the error: sudo service postgresql start Does it return any specific errors? And please check: /var/log/postgresql/postgresql*.log Do you see any errors? The package installation is failing at starting postgresql The PostgreSQL server failed to start. Please check the log output. so if we could get you to manually try and start it we can see if there is an error thrown out that can be fixed. -- package postgresql-8.4 8.4.5-0ubuntu10.04 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665983 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579479] Re: package postgresql-8.4 8.4.3-0ubuntu9.10 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Hey Emada, The error was located in DPKGTerminalLog.Txt. ** Changed in: postgresql-8.4 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- package postgresql-8.4 8.4.3-0ubuntu9.10 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579479 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 108296] Re: missing /etc/postgresql/ after uninstall/reinstall
Hello Joschi dpkg -P is a purge. If a package is being uninstalled by apt, synaptics or aptitude and does not properly purge the files, you should file a bug against the respective package manager instead of against postgresql. Thanks for taking the time to help make Ubuntu better. ** Changed in: postgresql-8.4 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- missing /etc/postgresql/ after uninstall/reinstall https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 665983] Re: package postgresql-8.4 8.4.5-0ubuntu10.04 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Changed in: postgresql-8.4 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- package postgresql-8.4 8.4.5-0ubuntu10.04 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665983 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 653401] Re: Patch required by fglrx but not supplied automatically
This was fixed in the final release. ** Changed in: fglrx-installer (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: fglrx-installer (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Jordon Bedwell (envygeeks) -- Patch required by fglrx but not supplied automatically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653401 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 660518] [NEW] Ruby1.9.1 should not provide rubygems1.9.1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ruby1.9.1 Some people may opt to install ruby1.9.1 because it provides ruby1.9.2 which is known to be faster in benchmarks than Ruby1.8 however, it came a surprise today when I installed ruby1.9.1 on a production system and it provided gem which is highly unrecommended because Ubuntu disables --system updates and even worse does not update fast enough. Please remove gem from the package ruby1.9.1,. - Ruby1.9.1 - #~:/usr/bin$ apt-cache show ruby1.9.1 Package: ruby1.9.1 Priority: optional Section: universe/ruby Installed-Size: 180 Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com Original-Maintainer: akira yamada ak...@debian.org Architecture: amd64 Version: 1.9.2.0-1 Replaces: irb1.9.1, rdoc1.9.1, rubygems1.9.1 Provides: irb1.9.1, rdoc1.9.1, ruby1.9.2, rubygems1.9.1 Depends: libruby1.9.1 (= 1.9.2.0-1), libc6 (= 2.2.5) Suggests: ruby1.9.1-examples, ri1.9.1, graphviz Conflicts: irb1.9.1, rdoc1.9.1, rubygems1.9.1 Filename: pool/universe/r/ruby1.9.1/ruby1.9.1_1.9.2.0-1_amd64.deb Size: 36476 MD5sum: 6c350be49aefe69b6561d5388e3018a2 SHA1: e55858237ca0aae3366d3c8c13130bf26101bb2e SHA256: a13595d8aef6d6d0eff9361cedcacc67a55338290aded187fe58e8e741e6a240 Description: Interpreter of object-oriented scripting language Ruby 1.9.2 Ruby is the interpreted scripting language for quick and easy object-oriented programming. It has many features to process text files and to do system management tasks (as in perl). It is simple, straight-forward, and extensible. . This package provides version 1.9.2 series of Ruby, which is binary-compatible with the 1.9.1 branch. Homepage: http://www.ruby-lang.org/ Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug Origin: Ubuntu - Ruby1.8 -- #~:/usr/bin$ apt-cache show ruby1.8 Package: ruby1.8 Priority: optional Section: interpreters Installed-Size: 168 Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com Original-Maintainer: akira yamada ak...@debian.org Architecture: amd64 Version: 1.8.7.299-2 Replaces: irb1.8, rdoc1.8 Provides: irb1.8, rdoc1.8 Depends: libc6 (= 2.2.5), libruby1.8 (= 1.8.7.299-2) Suggests: ruby1.8-examples, ri1.8 Conflicts: irb1.8, rdoc1.8 Filename: pool/main/r/ruby1.8/ruby1.8_1.8.7.299-2_amd64.deb Size: 32258 MD5sum: 6a655cea08abab9cb9be33580a2373ce SHA1: 8122f5a7190a949586c372ea77301715cd1d84fa SHA256: fdae2e5d7e2ece6a1fafccb5bca197c58bbc52ec8e25c89b2b2f44863176d0cc Description: Interpreter of object-oriented scripting language Ruby 1.8 Ruby is the interpreted scripting language for quick and easy object-oriented programming. It has many features to process text files and to do system management tasks (as in perl). It is simple, straight-forward, and extensible. . This package provides version 1.8 series of Ruby. . On Debian, Ruby 1.8 is provided as separate packages. You can get full Ruby 1.8 distribution by installing following packages. . ruby1.8 ruby1.8-dev ri1.8 ruby1.8-elisp ruby1.8-examples libtcltk-ruby1.8 Homepage: http://www.ruby-lang.org/ Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug Origin: Ubuntu Supported: 18m ** Affects: ruby1.9.1 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: Binary package hint: ruby1.9.1 Some people may opt to install ruby1.9.1 because it provides ruby1.9.2 which is known to be faster in benchmarks than Ruby1.8 however, it came a surprise today when I installed ruby1.9.1 on a production system and it provided gem which is highly unrecommended because Ubuntu disables --system updates and even worse does not update fast enough. Please remove gem from the package ruby1.9.1,. - Ruby1.9.1 - - envyge...@envygeeks:/usr/bin$ apt-cache show ruby1.9.1 + #~:/usr/bin$ apt-cache show ruby1.9.1 Package: ruby1.9.1 Priority: optional Section: universe/ruby Installed-Size: 180 Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com Original-Maintainer: akira yamada ak...@debian.org Architecture: amd64 Version: 1.9.2.0-1 Replaces: irb1.9.1, rdoc1.9.1, rubygems1.9.1 Provides: irb1.9.1, rdoc1.9.1, ruby1.9.2, rubygems1.9.1 Depends: libruby1.9.1 (= 1.9.2.0-1), libc6 (= 2.2.5) Suggests: ruby1.9.1-examples, ri1.9.1, graphviz Conflicts: irb1.9.1, rdoc1.9.1, rubygems1.9.1 Filename: pool/universe/r/ruby1.9.1/ruby1.9.1_1.9.2.0-1_amd64.deb Size: 36476 MD5sum: 6c350be49aefe69b6561d5388e3018a2 SHA1: e55858237ca0aae3366d3c8c13130bf26101bb2e SHA256: a13595d8aef6d6d0eff9361cedcacc67a55338290aded187fe58e8e741e6a240 Description: Interpreter of object-oriented scripting language Ruby 1.9.2 - Ruby is the interpreted scripting language for quick and easy - object-oriented programming. It has many features to process text - files and to do system management tasks (as in perl). It is simple, - straight-forward, and extensible. - . - This package provides version 1.9.2 series of Ruby, which is binary-compatible - with the 1.9.1
[Bug 660518] Re: Ruby1.9.1 should not provide rubygems1.9.1
I'm pretty sure I implied it was included? And it's not too complicated to remove. It took us mere minutes to remove it from the source and to rebuild it. The least you could have done was ask it be moved upstream instead of making up bad excuses and marking the ticket as invalid when it's a wishlist issue. -- Ruby1.9.1 should not provide rubygems1.9.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660518 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 402017] Re: GDM login theme change when using accessibility features
Still plaguing Maverick as well. -- GDM login theme change when using accessibility features https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/402017 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 635029] Re: Downloaded .deb doesn't appear in Installed Software after installation
Is this bug still affecting you? As of today, after checking it appears that hand installed software does get listed in the software centre. I have tried this with skype, opera, GIMP PPA and Google Voice Plugin. -- Downloaded .deb doesn't appear in Installed Software after installation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/635029 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 653401] [NEW] Patch required by fglrx but not supplied automatically
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: fglrx When a user attempts to install fglrx on Maverick via additional drivers or even manually using apt-get they will receive: Error! Application of patch use-cflags_module-together-with-modflags.patch failed via apt-get or simply just get an error when trying to install via additional drivers, installing patch fixes this error in both but patch is not provided by Maverick in the default install. So perhaps make patch a depends or provide patch in the default Maverick install. ** Affects: fglrx-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: additional-drivers fglrx patch restricted -- Patch required by fglrx but not supplied automatically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653401 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 653401] Re: Patch required by fglrx but not supplied automatically
** Description changed: Binary package hint: fglrx When a user attempts to install fglrx on Maverick via additional drivers or even manually using apt-get they will receive: Error! Application of patch use-cflags_module-together-with-modflags.patch failed via apt-get or simply just get an error when trying to install via additional drivers, installing patch fixes this error in both but patch is not provided by Maverick in the default install. So perhaps make patch a depends or provide patch in the default Maverick install. + + graphics cards: asus ATI 4870, asus ATI 5870 (not in use) + using default ubuntu install (nothing else installed just default) -- Patch required by fglrx but not supplied automatically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653401 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 641469] Re: cannot report a bug of a root process
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- cannot report a bug of a root process https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641469 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 648272] Re: non executable bit on cd rom media
David, This is not a bug, it's a feature. According to upstream you can disable NX Bit using the kernel flag noexec=off and noexec32=off, if you still have problems, disable it in your CPU too using your BIOS. Please also refrain from making false statements about other operating systems on Launchpad. While I am no Windows fanboy, it is not true that Microsoft needs to BUY some CODE in this case, since Microsoft has implemented DEP (NX Bit) since Windows XP SP2 and NX Bit was mostly designed to prevent buffer overflows, not all Malware, if it was designed to prevent all types of Malware you certainly wouldn't ever see rootkits and backdoors on corporate Linux and Windows environments. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New = Opinion -- non executable bit on cd rom media https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648272 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 648272] Re: non executable bit on cd rom media
David, This is not a bug, it's a feature. According to upstream you can disable NX Bit using the kernel flag noexec=off and noexec32=off, if you still have problems, disable it in your CPU too using your BIOS. Please also refrain from making false statements about other operating systems on Launchpad. While I am no Windows fanboy, it is not true that Microsoft needs to BUY some CODE in this case, since Microsoft has implemented DEP (NX Bit) since Windows XP SP2 and NX Bit was mostly designed to prevent buffer overflows, not all Malware, if it was designed to prevent all types of Malware you certainly wouldn't ever see rootkits and backdoors on corporate Linux and Windows environments. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New = Opinion -- non executable bit on cd rom media https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648272 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 641469] Re: cannot report a bug of a root process
I was unable to replicate this and was able to run a report on a root process using sudo. Are you sure that the process was still alive when you were trying to run the report? Try doing: sudo ubuntu-bug 1 and see if you still get that message so you can work out whether or not it was simply an issue with the process dying. -- cannot report a bug of a root process https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641469 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 647291] Re: policyui.py crashed with GError in __init__()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 638085 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/638085 ** Visibility changed to: Private ** Visibility changed to: Public -- policyui.py crashed with GError in __init__() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/647291 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
