[Bug 1900104] Re: Garbage is displayed on a separate page instead of a picture or table
I cannot reproduce this behavior with current Debian packages. I get the table properly laid out and new erroneous code on the last page. I also tried my installation of TeX Live 2019 and also there I didn't have any problems. The version of TL2019 I have is sligthly newer than what is in Ubuntu: -LaTeX2e <2020-02-02> patch level 2 +LaTeX2e <2020-02-02> patch level 5 -Package: babel 2020/02/14 3.40 The Babel package +Package: babel 2020/02/28 3.41 The Babel package My guess is that the problem is with LaTeX patch level, it took a bit until all the bugs were fixed in the LaTeX release. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900104 Title: Garbage is displayed on a separate page instead of a picture or table To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-base/+bug/1900104/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 581770] Re: [Kubuntu][dvipdfmx][Japanese] dvipdfmx can't create PDF by default from DVI file that includes japanese characters.
Not reproducible here on Debian, but the reason is very obvious ...
> Kubuntu 10.04 (i386)
> Virtualbox 3.1.8
> Language Japanese
> texlive-base(dvipdfmx) 2009-7
This is so horribly outdated that there is no way it can work.
platex and friends were introduced into TeX Live starting from 2008 and
and it took 2-3 years to get full support.
So, on a current system, with say TeX Live 2020 (Debian version here),
this is all working.
I think bugs from 2009 should be closed in 2020.
$ file hello.tex
hello.tex: LaTeX 2e document, UTF-8 Unicode text
$ cat hello.tex
\documentclass[a4paper]{jsarticle}
\begin{document}
Hello World ハローワールド 日本語のテスト
\end{document}
$ nkf --overwrite -e hello.tex
$ file hello.tex
hello.tex: LaTeX 2e document, ISO-8859 text # what a mischaracterization!
$ platex -kanji=euc hello.tex
This is e-pTeX, Version 3.14159265-p3.8.3-191112-2.6 (euc) (TeX Live
2020/Debian) (preloaded format=platex)
restricted \write18 enabled.
entering extended mode
(./hello.tex
pLaTeX2e <2020-04-12> (based on LaTeX2e <2020-02-02> patch level 5)
L3 programming layer <2020-07-17>
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/platex/jsclasses/jsarticle.cls
Document Class: jsarticle 2020/02/02 jsclasses (okumura, texjporg)
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/platex/jsclasses/jslogo.sty))
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/l3backend/l3backend-dvips.def)
(./hello.aux) [1] (./hello.aux) )
Output written on hello.dvi (1 page, 344 bytes).
Transcript written on hello.log.
$ dvipdfmx hello.dvi
hello.dvi -> hello.pdf
[1]
2851 bytes written
$
Norbert
--
PREINING Norbert https://www.preining.info
Accelia Inc. + IFMGA ProGuide + TU Wien + JAIST + TeX Live + Debian Dev
GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/581770
Title:
[Kubuntu][dvipdfmx][Japanese] dvipdfmx can't create PDF by default
from DVI file that includes japanese characters.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-base/+bug/581770/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1888797] Re: missing luahbtex
Hi Martin, > Thank you Norbert. That would be great. I think your running the PPA > would be a far better solution. Fine with me! I could help the Ubuntu people also for their versions, but I don't **run** for them. If they would ask ... > The current (2019) version is 2019.20190605.51237-3build2 in the main > repo Yes, that is to be expected. > So might I suggest 2020.20200327.54578-4~ubuntu20.04 ? This follows a > convention followed by a number of ppas of having the ubuntu version in > the version number. But you can put any suffix you like there. There are > no strong rules about it for a ppa. Hmmm, the page I linked https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA/BuildingASourcePackage#versioning has *rather clear* version number explanations. They expect some ppa string to be contained. My guess would have been 2020.20200327.54578-4ppa1~ubuntu20.04 or so ... WDYT? Best Norbert -- PREINING Norbert https://www.preining.info Accelia Inc. + IFMGA ProGuide + TU Wien + JAIST + TeX Live + Debian Dev GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888797 Title: missing luahbtex To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-base/+bug/1888797/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1888797] Re: missing luahbtex
BTW, I have just rebuild the current texlive-bin from Debian/sid on Pop- OS which is Ubuntu 20.04 plus some extra stuff. I didn't get any problems (besides failing tests when the system libkpathsea6 is installed, but removing it builds worked out). I can create a PPA for TeX Live (and related) packages for 20.04LTS to ship TL2020 as we have it in Debian. I just would like to have a suggestion about the version number, since the documentation at https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA/BuildingASourcePackage#versioning isn't very specific about this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888797 Title: missing luahbtex To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-base/+bug/1888797/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1888797] Re: missing luahbtex
> I downloaded texlive-bin 2020 and tried to debuild. But I have harfbuzz > 2.6.4 and there seems to be some mismatch in xetex over whether > harfbuzz-icu is needed or not. The packaging files imply that all Can you show the error message? I will try to set up VM with Ubuntu 20.04, but it shouldn't be a problem, the same package compiles fine in Debian/testing which should be close to what 20.04 is shipping. Best Norbert -- PREINING Norbert https://www.preining.info Accelia Inc. + IFMGA ProGuide + TU Wien + JAIST + TeX Live + Debian Dev GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888797 Title: missing luahbtex To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-base/+bug/1888797/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1888797] [NEW] missing luahbtex
On Fri, 24 Jul 2020, mhosken wrote: > I'm trying to install luahbtex. texlive-luatex implies it includes the ... > Package: texlive-luatex 2019.20200218-1 You are using TeX Live 2019 which does not ship luahbtex on Debian and Ubuntu (and even on upstream only in very rare cases). Please push Ubuntu developers to update to TeX Live 2020 as available in Debian. Best Norbert -- PREINING Norbert https://www.preining.info Accelia Inc. + IFMGA ProGuide + TU Wien + JAIST + TeX Live + Debian Dev GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888797 Title: missing luahbtex To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-base/+bug/1888797/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1869280]
No, with my 5.19.3 packages I cannot reproduce this anymore. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869280 Title: Plasma system settings app crashes when selecting Virtual Desktops menu item To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kirigami2/+bug/1869280/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1859963] Re: Info package on Ubuntu Focal comes preinstalled with desktop file
Hi Sebastian, > @Norbert, it's not the ideal solution no, those .desktop are not really > good desktop applications and ideally they would be dropped in What do you do on the Ubuntu side with say julia.desktop which starts a julia shell? Similarly: ocaml, R, SageMath, ... there are quite a lot of applications with Terminal=true? Hide all of them in Gnome? Best Norbert -- PREINING Norbert http://www.preining.info Accelia Inc. + IFMGA ProGuide + TU Wien + JAIST + TeX Live + Debian Dev GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859963 Title: Info package on Ubuntu Focal comes preinstalled with desktop file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1859963/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1859963] Re: Info package on Ubuntu Focal comes preinstalled with desktop file
Hi > It probably won't be fixed by the Debian package maintainer so this > needs to be patched in Ubuntu (for example by adding the line from > comment #2). If Ubuntu think that this is the correct way, fine with me. But Gnome3 is not the only Desktop, and some users *might* want interesting stuff, too. So I leave this to the Ubuntu maintainers. (Debian maintainer here) Best Norbert -- PREINING Norbert http://www.preining.info Accelia Inc. + IFMGA ProGuide + TU Wien + JAIST + TeX Live + Debian Dev GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1859963 Title: Info package on Ubuntu Focal comes preinstalled with desktop file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1859963/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1857547] [NEW] fmtutil fails with default LANG=C.UTF-8, needs LANG=C
On Wed, 25 Dec 2019, Török Edwin wrote: > Luatex fmtutil fails when LANG=C.UTF-8 (the default): > ``` > > fmtutil [INFO]: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdftex/eplain.fmt installed. > fmtutil [ERROR]: running `luatex -ini -jobname=luatex -progname=luatex > luatex.ini fmtutil [ERROR]: return error due to options --strict I cannot reproduce this on Debian: $ export LANG=C.UTF-8 $ fmtutil-sys --byfmt lualatex fmtutil: fmtutil is using the following fmtutil.cnf files (in precedence order): fmtutil: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf fmtutil: /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/web2c/fmtutil.cnf fmtutil: fmtutil is using the following fmtutil.cnf file for writing changes: fmtutil: /etc/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf fmtutil [INFO]: writing formats under /var/lib/texmf/web2c fmtutil [INFO]: --- remaking lualatex with luatex fmtutil: running `luatex -ini -jobname=lualatex -progname=lualatex lualatex.ini' ... This is LuaTeX, Version 1.10.0 (TeX Live 2019/Debian) (INITEX) restricted system commands enabled. .. Transcript written on lualatex.log. fmtutil [INFO]: log file copied to: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/luatex/lualatex.log fmtutil [INFO]: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/luatex/lualatex.fmt installed. fmtutil [INFO]: disabled formats: 1 fmtutil [INFO]: successfully rebuilt formats: 1 fmtutil [INFO]: not selected formats: 52 fmtutil [INFO]: total formats: 54 fmtutil [INFO]: exiting with status 0 $ Best Norbert -- PREINING Norbert http://www.preining.info Accelia Inc. + IFMGA ProGuide + TU Wien + JAIST + TeX Live + Debian Dev GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1857547 Title: fmtutil fails with default LANG=C.UTF-8, needs LANG=C To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-base/+bug/1857547/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1789298] Re: info missing help docs "info info" and "H" command return error
On Thu, 11 Apr 2019, Kasia Gauza wrote:
> info missing help docs "info info" and "H" command return error
> The info command in Ubuntu 18.04 lacks it's own info page. This means
Install
texinfo-doc-nonfree
Norbert
--
PREINING Norbert http://www.preining.info
Accelia Inc. +JAIST +TeX Live +Debian Developer
GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1789298
Title:
info missing help docs "info info" and "H" command return error
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texinfo/+bug/1789298/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1799887] Re: Package out of date, there are bugfixes in newer version
Can be closed since we switched to abraunegg fork ** Changed in: onedrive (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1799887 Title: Package out of date, there are bugfixes in newer version To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/onedrive/+bug/1799887/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1790432] Re: skilion base repo appears abandonded; recommend rebase to abraunegg fork
@Jarek This is because you use the released version 18.10 Cosmic, which contains the old version. That is true. But the development version, that is the next release, will contain the abraunegg version. ** Changed in: onedrive (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1790432 Title: skilion base repo appears abandonded; recommend rebase to abraunegg fork To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/onedrive/+bug/1790432/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1790432] Re: skilion base repo appears abandonded; recommend rebase to abraunegg fork
The current version in Debian and Ubuntu is already based on abraunegg version, please close this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1790432 Title: skilion base repo appears abandonded; recommend rebase to abraunegg fork To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/onedrive/+bug/1790432/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728354] Re: ntfs: unsupported reparse point
Hi Jean-Pierre, I'll see whether it comes up again, and if yes, I'll not play around to fix it but try to send all the infos you need. Concerning version number: I don't see any particular problems with this version, though? Do you think this version is insufficient, and if yes, in which respect? All the best Norbert -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728354 Title: ntfs: unsupported reparse point To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntfs-3g/+bug/1728354/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728354] Re: ntfs: unsupported reparse point
Hi Jean-Pierre, thanks for your quick response. I realized that I was not completely correct with what I wrote. I had the files on the local drive *I*BELIEVE*, but checking the settings of OneDrive I saw that the option "Save Space blabla on demand" was turned on. I then turned that option off, which resulted in hardly any activity because as I said I believe all the files were already there. Then I rebooted into Linux and could access all files without any problems. I tried to revert by going back to Windows, turning the "on demand" option on in the OneDrive settings, let OneDrive settle down a bit, and rebooted back into Linux again. To my surprise, I could still read all the files. (and yes, I know, this is not what actually helps you, sorry). Concerning the ntfs number: ntfs-3g 2017.3.23 integrated FUSE 28 - Third Generation NTFS Driver Configuration type 7, XATTRS are on, POSIX ACLS are on All the best Norbert -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728354 Title: ntfs: unsupported reparse point To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntfs-3g/+bug/1728354/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728354] Re: ntfs: unsupported reparse point
Chiming in with some answers in the last document: * running Windows 10 latest (retracted) update (I got it somehow) * Debian/unstable * ntfs-3g 1:2017.3.23-2 * files should be all available offline (not on-demand) ``` # ls -l /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ntfs-3g/ total 60 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 16680 Oct 29 15:16 ntfs-plugin-8013.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 21562 Oct 29 15:16 ntfs-plugin-8017.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 7202 Oct 29 15:08 ntfs-plugin-9000301a.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root23 Oct 29 15:12 ntfs-plugin-9000601a.so -> ntfs-plugin-9000301a.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root23 Oct 29 15:12 ntfs-plugin-9000701a.so -> ntfs-plugin-9000301a.so ``` With these files in place, I can access the OneDrive folder now (before it was not possible), but the files in OneDrive are not accessible (unsupported reparse point). For one file (TeXLaTeXcourse.pdf, inode 330476) I did ntfsinfo -fvi 330476 /dev/sda3 and got the attached ntfsinfo.txt Any suggestions what else is necessary? ** Attachment added: "ntfsinfo.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntfs-3g/+bug/1728354/+attachment/5206621/+files/ntfsinfo.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728354 Title: ntfs: unsupported reparse point To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntfs-3g/+bug/1728354/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1574589] Re: package texlive-fonts-recommended-doc 2015.20160320-1 failed to install/upgrade: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Hi > $ sudo apt-get install texlive-base > texlive-base : Depends: luatex (>= 0.70.1) but it is not going to be > installed > Depends: texlive-binaries (>= 2013.20130512) but it is not > going to be installed > E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. Sorry, please complain to the Ubuntu maintainers. This problem does not occur on Debian, and I am only running Debian and have no access nor experience with Ubuntu. Norbert ---- PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574589 Title: package texlive-fonts-recommended-doc 2015.20160320-1 failed to install/upgrade: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-base/+bug/1574589/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1530876] [NEW] texlive-latex-extra should depend on texlive-fonts-extra
> (The best solution would be to have a more granular system rather than > huge texlive packages... I guess something like the new Nix Texlive > system: > https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/tools/typesetting/tex > /texlive-new/default.nix#L1 ) Which, btw, seems not to deal properly with maps, formats, engines, all these niceties .. The script in your link simply unpacks the texlive tlnet package. But there are a set of post actions defined in the tlpobj that need to be taken. Norbert ---- PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1530876 Title: texlive-latex-extra should depend on texlive-fonts-extra To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-extra/+bug/1530876/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1449875] Re: ghostscript fails on some EPS files
On Sat, 19 Sep 2015, Till Kamppeter wrote: > The problem of the added files is that these added files, 40 recommended > packages, several 100 MB of unneeded data, make the standard > installation too big. Sorry, could you please try at least to stay on topic. The bug is about an eps file that with the installation of a package stopped being rendered. This is completely independent from your wishlist about what packages are recommended and what not. Can we please separate actual problems (EPS not rendered) from your packaging problems. As Ubuntu you are free to change package relations at will. I as Debian/TeX Live maintainer am interested in fixing a problem where the installation of a package changes the behaviour of gs. Norbert PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1449875 Title: ghostscript fails on some EPS files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1449875/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1449875] Re: ghostscript fails on some EPS files
On Sat, 19 Sep 2015, Till Kamppeter wrote: > Can the Recommends: of texlive-lang-cjk be demoted to Suggests:? > Ghostscript only needs texlive-lang-cjk and nothing more for being able > to render the attached file. Can you please be a bit more specific why this is a problem? And *what* recommends you are talking about? texlive-lang-japanese? -chinese? -korean? ruby? latex-cjk-all? > Alternatively, can the binary package texlive-lang-cjk be split into two > packages, texlive-lang-cjk-gs containing all the files of the former > texlive-lang-cjk and texlive-lang-cjk depending on texlive-lang-cjk-gs > and recommending what texlive-lang-cjk recommended before. Then we let > Ghostscript depend on texlive-lang-cjk-gs making only the files of this > package getting onto the system and the rest of the world uses texlive- > lang-cjk pulling in all the 40 extra packages. You could be more specific *what* the problem is ... what files do gs need from which package. That would help. Norbert ---- PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1449875 Title: ghostscript fails on some EPS files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1449875/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1449875] Re: ghostscript fails on some EPS files
On Sat, 19 Sep 2015, Till Kamppeter wrote: > What is happening here is the following. With a standard Ubuntu Desktop > installation Ghostscript is not able to render the file attached to this > bug report. If one installs only the texlive-lang-cjk and nothing more > (therefore "--no-install-recommends"), Ghostscript remders the attached > file correctly. > > This leads to the conclusion that adding the files contained in texlive- > lang-cjk to the system fixes Ghostscript's problem to render the > attached file. But which *added* file creates the problem? I am slightly surprised about this, and can only possible blame it on latex-cjk as the other packages do not do anything related to ghostscript and do not add fonts to the general search path. Can you please check what file is read by gs that creates the problem? Furthermore, *why* do you want gs recommends texlive-lang-cjk? What do you need as gs from it? Norbert PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1449875 Title: ghostscript fails on some EPS files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1449875/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1242914] Re: tlmgr unable to set up TLPDB
Seems as if the system gets confused between the system installed tlmgr and the vanila tlmgr. In your email I din't see any confusion, solely a manner of the PATH environment variable. i would suggest to make a solution which can update the PATH variables so this problems is avoided. This is your responsability if you have installed a vanilla TL, nothing the distribution can do for you. I suggest editing your .profile. Norbert PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1242914 Title: tlmgr unable to set up TLPDB To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-base/+bug/1242914/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1382977]
Ok, sorry for the noise. I killed Thunar and restarted it, but that seems to not have sufficed. After logging out of xfce and logging in again I now see the proper behaviour. I will go ahead and prepare an NMU for Debian's thunar. Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1382977 Title: Thunar open default not respecting mimetype To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunar/+bug/1382977/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1382977]
Hi everyone, I just tried the patch from the second attachment (from Guido) on Debian/sid, but it does not fix everything. The selected application is now used, but changing the default application is still broken. In particular, right clicking on an item I see Open with A but when I right-click - Properties and check the Open with droplist, then there is a different value written. It seems that another place needs fixing, or do I need to use *both* of the attached patches in this bug? Thanks Norbert -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1382977 Title: Thunar open default not respecting mimetype To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunar/+bug/1382977/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1325230]
Ok, I reopen this bug against poppler, as poppler seems to implement something that is in contradiction to what Adobe recommends. I refer you to the Adobe Glyph List Specification http://sourceforge.net/adobe/aglfn/wiki/AGL%20Specification/ which clearly states in Section 6. Assigning glyph names for new fonts: *** For glyphs that represent ligatures of standard Unicode characters, there are two suggested formats for their glyph names, as follows: 1. Descriptive. The decomposition is expressed by joining the glyph names of the standard Unicode characters, in order, using an underscore (U+005F; LOW LINE). The glyph names of the characters should specify the uni or u prefixes and use uppercase hexadecimal digits, as described above, or with a name from AGL. For example, the o f f i ligature should be named o_f_f_i. 2. UV with uni prefix. *** Thus, poppler should check for f_i *as*well*as* fi (for backward compatibility). Thanks Norbert Preining TeX Live Team -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1325230 Title: evince does not display ligatures To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fontconfig/+bug/1325230/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1295792] Re: package texlive-generic-recommended 2013.20140215-1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/doc/texlive-doc/generic/kastrup/binhex.pdf', which is also in packa
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014, Michael Wisheu wrote: package texlive-generic-recommended 2013.20140215-1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/doc/texlive- doc/generic/kastrup/binhex.pdf', which is also in package texlive- latex-extra-doc 2009-10ubuntu1 I don't know about Ubuntu, but in Debian it is not supported to jump over one release. You are upgrading from texlive 2009 which was in Debian oldstable to texlive 2013 which is not existing anymore in Debian. So you are at least jumping oldstable - stable - testing which is not supported. I would recommend * purging all texlive 2009 packages * install the 2013 packages Norbert PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295792 Title: package texlive-generic-recommended 2013.20140215-1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/doc/texlive- doc/generic/kastrup/binhex.pdf', which is also in package texlive- latex-extra-doc 2009-10ubuntu1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-base/+bug/1295792/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1242914] Re: tlmgr unable to set up TLPDB
On Mo, 17 Feb 2014, Yonatan Yehezkeally wrote: @NorbertPreining have you noted the fact that this error is given in response to Yes, but it fixed in the Debian packages, and that is my only responsability. Ubuntu has to pull new packages, but there is nothing I can do to influence that. as well? It seems one cannot set up user-mode. I presume that's not how it's *supposed* to work? Right, here it looks like: [~] tlmgr init-usertree (running on Debian, switching to user mode!) [~] tlmgr install 12many (running on Debian, switching to user mode!) tlmgr: package repository ftp://ftp.riken.go.jp/pub/tex-archive/systems/texlive/tlnet [1/1, ??:??/??:??] install: 12many [3k] tlmgr: package log updated: /home/norbert/texmf/web2c/tlmgr.log running mktexlsr ... done running mktexlsr. [~] PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1242914 Title: tlmgr unable to set up TLPDB To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-base/+bug/1242914/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1242914] Re: tlmgr unable to set up TLPDB
On Di, 14 Jan 2014, chbrosso wrote: It is quite disappointing to see that no one can add packages to TeX in 13.10 because of this. Was a bug fix considered, instead of waiting THat is *supposed* to be like it. $ tlmgr --gui (running on Debian, switching to user mode!) tlmgr *always* runs in user-mode. You have to set up user mode according to the manual. Norbert PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1242914 Title: tlmgr unable to set up TLPDB To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-base/+bug/1242914/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 822828] Re: texlive-latex-extra-doc is too big in size and includes unneeded big minitoc-fr.pdf file (~27Mb)
Hi a) minitoc-fr.pdf (27 MB) belongs into the package for users speaking arbitrary languages and b) minitoc.pdf must have many figures of flags and maps of countries I care neither for one or the other, but I simply follow upstream TeX Live which in turn follows up-upstream minitoc authors. That's it. Tou can try to convince the minitoc authors to: * reduce the size of the pdf * split the french manual into a separate package * remove everything all to your liking! After that the same will happen in TL and then in Debian and after that in Ubuntu, like the river flows from the source downward. Norbert PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/822828 Title: texlive-latex-extra-doc is too big in size and includes unneeded big minitoc-fr.pdf file (~27Mb) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-extra/+bug/822828/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1242914] Re: tlmgr unable to set up TLPDB
actually nothing works for tlmgr at all (except `tlmgr help`): Indeed, because ... $ tlmgr --usermode init-usertree THis does not work. THat is a bug upstream that has been fixed in the meantime but needs to go through a new Debian package until it arrives in the Debian derivative from Canonical that cannot be named without problems [1]. Thanks [1] http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/11/canonical- abused-trademark-law-to-target-a-site-critical-of-ubuntu-privacy/ Norbert PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1242914 Title: tlmgr unable to set up TLPDB To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-base/+bug/1242914/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 822828] Re: texlive-latex-extra-doc is too big in size and includes unneeded big minitoc-fr.pdf file (~27Mb)
On Do, 24 Okt 2013, Nils Ole Tippenhauer wrote: I agree completely. I certainly never needed any content from this package, and yet it seems to be pulled in by other texlive-latex-extra stuff. Wrong. It is only a *recommend*, that means you *can* deselect it if you want. End of discussion. Norbert PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/822828 Title: texlive-latex-extra-doc is too big in size and includes unneeded big minitoc-fr.pdf file (~27Mb) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-extra/+bug/822828/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 993407] Re: install-info can fail to install due to syntax errors in /etc/environment
On Do, 24 Okt 2013, getman wrote: I found usefull advice about changing 'EXPORT' to 'export'. Additional rised the follow error: /etc/environment: string 13: PGDATA: command not found because I have set up PostgreSQL db. The reason is comically - extra spaces on the follow string PGDATA = /var/lib/postgresql/data errors! PGDATA=/var/lib/postgresql/data ok Guys, if you are not able to write correct shell code, and put it into one of the central configuration files, then I am sorry for you, but I will not change anything. I cannot prevent you from shooting yourself in the knee. Can someone please close this bug ... Enjoy Norbert PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993407 Title: install-info can fail to install due to syntax errors in /etc/environment To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texinfo/+bug/993407/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1242914] [NEW] tlmgr unable to set up TLPDB
On Mo, 21 Okt 2013, Nathan Skillen wrote: $ tlmgr --gui (running on Debian, switching to user mode!) Loading local TeX Live database; this may take some time, please be patient ... cannot setup TLPDB in /home/nskillen/texmf at /usr/bin/tlmgr line 5308. Compilation failed in require at /usr/bin/tlmgr line 4439. Please read tlmgr --help or man tlmgr and in particular the section on USER MODE Please anyone close this bug. Norbert PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1242914 Title: tlmgr unable to set up TLPDB To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-base/+bug/1242914/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 993407] Re: install-info can fail to install due to syntax errors in /etc/environment
On Do, 10 Okt 2013, Brian Murray wrote: The package install-info sources /etc/environment and will fail to install if there are any configuration errors in that file. This seems to happen a fair bit. Yes, and if we ad rm -rf / into /etc/profile then we can also get bugs ... I don't care for bugs that are misconfiguration of users. We cannot protect users from shooting themselves ... Norbert PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993407 Title: install-info can fail to install due to syntax errors in /etc/environment To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texinfo/+bug/993407/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1223688] Re: Sync texlive-lang 2013.20130905-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
On Mo, 16 Sep 2013, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: Is this needed for Saucy, or can this wait until next cycle? We are now post FeatureFreeze. Ditto the rest of texlive-* sync requests from you. Feature wise there are hardly any changes, only updates of the included TeX Live sub-components (sty files, fonts, etc). On the other hand, pullin gtexlive-bin -2 would be a good idea, it contains a lot of bug fixes from upstream. Personally, as the maintainer of the Debian packages, I don't see much problem in pulling the new releases. Norbert PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1223688 Title: Sync texlive-lang 2013.20130905-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-lang/+bug/1223688/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1178006] [NEW] dvipdfm missing in texmf font map directory.
On Mi, 08 Mai 2013, Ivo Kubjas wrote: /usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/map/dvipdfm/updmap/dvipdfm.map /usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/map/dvipdfm/updmap/dvipdfm_dl14.map /usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/map/dvipdfm/updmap/dvipdfm_ndl14.map These are missing in quantal and raring but are required for Piscript. Then piscript should be fixed. dvipdfm is long gone, and in TL2013 there will be no reference to dvipdfm anymore at all. Norbert PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1178006 Title: dvipdfm missing in texmf font map directory. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-base/+bug/1178006/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1164608] Re: package texlive-xetex 2012.20120611-4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
On Fr, 05 Apr 2013, Tiago Cogumbreiro wrote: (/home/tiago/texmf/tex/latex/base/ltpatch.ltx) What should we do if you have your own outdated old wrong ltpatch.ltx?? Logging in as root (sudo su) and doing an apt-get -f install fixed this problem. Not surprisingly ... since root does not read your $HOME/texmf Bogus bug, should be closed. Norbert PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1164608 Title: package texlive-xetex 2012.20120611-4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-base/+bug/1164608/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1154643] [NEW] No way to install pdfcrop only
On Mi, 13 Mär 2013, Forlong wrote: Public bug reported: According to the developer's site, the program should be less than 20 kb http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdfcrop/files/pdfcrop/ But on Ubuntu I need to install nearly 100 MB of dependencies! Yes, because you need TeX to get a working pdfcrop. THe size from the above webpage is only for the script itself, but without a working TeX and Ghostscript nothing goes. Please anyone close this bug. Norbert PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1154643 Title: No way to install pdfcrop only To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-extra/+bug/1154643/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1081009]
Hi everyone, (In reply to comment #129) (In reply to comment #126) Ok. seems to work very stable now. I am running now a few days with the patches xf86-intel driver and this patch (#122), and didn't have any hiccups at all. Ok, I got one. It took a *long* time, and I (stupidly) didn't grab the error state (too tired after 24 hours of flight/travel), but it definitely happened while running a apt-get upgrade after a long time, while at the same time browsing photos from my travel. Let's say, the situation as wastely improved, but is not perfect. I will try to get the error state as soon as I hit it again. Actually trying it over, I see the following: 3.7.0 plus patch from #122 with patched intel driver is rock solid 3.8.0-rc2 with patched intel driver (but no kernel patch) hangs (uploading the error state file soon) I will try 3.8.0-rc3 with #122 patch plus the two from Chris 130/131 now. Norbert -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081009 Title: [arrandale] GPU lockup IPEHR: 0x0222 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1081009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1081009]
Created attachment 72770 i915 error state, 3.8.0-rc2, no patches -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081009 Title: [arrandale] GPU lockup IPEHR: 0x0222 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1081009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1081009]
3.7.0 plus patch from #122 with patched intel driver is rock solid 3.8.0-rc2 with patched intel driver (but no kernel patch) hangs (uploading the error state file soon) I will try 3.8.0-rc3 with #122 patch plus the two from Chris 130/131 now. 3.8.0-rc3 with patches from #122, #130, #131 seems to be very stable again. Concerning the other two requests: Since testing on *absence* of the bug always takes me a few days until I am convinced that it does not appear, which of the two #134 or #135 should I try next, taking into account that the patches from 122,130,131 do work out in some way. Thanks Norbert -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081009 Title: [arrandale] GPU lockup IPEHR: 0x0222 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1081009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1010909] Re: permission denied: /usr/bin/{mktexpk,mktextfm}
Hi
On So, 13 Jan 2013, Reuben Thomas wrote:
In short, the problem is that the apparmor profile for evince does not
allow the font files to be written.
As Debian maintainer of the package I cannot comment on what Ubuntu is
doing specially here.
Unfortunately, the algorithm used by the TeXLive scripts to decide where
to write generated font files is complicated. For example, in my case,
they seem to be written under
$HOME/texmf/fonts
Which is strange and can only be explained by your local adaptions.
On my computer it still installs into $TEXMFVAR = ~/.texmf-var
The respective files are:
/etc/texmf/web2c/mktex.cnf
which by default contains
: ${MT_FEATURES=appendonlydir:texmfvar}
which means that fonts are created in $TEXMFVAR
and there are other possibilities, I believe. Hence, finding a solution
that is both secure and reliable requires input from a TeXpert.
For the moment I have simply disabled Evince's apparmor profile.
That is Ubuntu's problem, since I don't have any idea what AppArmor
is doing or prohibiting or messing up.
Norbert
PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info
JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1010909
Title:
permission denied: /usr/bin/{mktexpk,mktextfm}
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-bin/+bug/1010909/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 707931] texinfo translation fix
Ciao Francesco, ciao tutti, sono il maintainer di texinfo su Debian (Ubuntu) e ne abbiamo un piccolo ma importante fix per la translazione in italiano. Una volta c'è ^_ (due caracteri) invece del control character ^_ Per questo sbaglio utenti nel locale di IT non riescono ad usare info. Vi prego di accetare questo fix il primo possibile: See Ubuntu bug 707931 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texinfo/+bug/707931 --- texinfo.orig/po/it.po +++ texinfo/po/it.po @@ -2175,8 +2175,8 @@ Questo è il file .../info/dir, che contiene il\n nodo più in alto della gerarchia di Info, chiamata (dir)Top.\n La prima volta che invochi il programma Info esso parte da questo nodo.\n -^_\n -%s\\tQuesto è il nodo più alto dell'albero INFO\n + \n +%s\tQuesto è il nodo più alto dell'albero INFO\n \n Questo (il nodo principale) fornisce un menù che contiene le voci principali.\n Grazie Norbert PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707931 Title: info can not find Top node (it_IT.UTF-8 Italian locale) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texinfo/+bug/707931/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 707931] texinfo translation fix
Dear Indonesian Translation Team, I would like to request an important fix for the translation of the texinfo package. In the translation one time the control character ^_ is appearing as two normal characters, which breaks info. Please consider fixing the translation with the following patch: See Ubuntu bug 707931 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texinfo/+bug/707931 --- texinfo.orig/po/id.po +++ texinfo/po/id.po @@ -2168,7 +2168,7 @@ Ini adalah berkas .../info/dir, yang berisi\n titik paling atas dari struktur Info, dipanggil (dir)Top.\n Pertama kali anda memanggil Info anda berawal dari melihat titik ini.\n -^_\n + \n %s\tIni adalah tingkat paling atas dari pohon INFO\n \n Ini (titik Direktori) memberikan sebuah menu dari topik utama.\n Thanks a lot and all the best Norbert PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707931 Title: info can not find Top node (it_IT.UTF-8 Italian locale) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texinfo/+bug/707931/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1081009]
(In reply to comment #126) Ok. seems to work very stable now. I am running now a few days with the patches xf86-intel driver and this patch (#122), and didn't have any hiccups at all. Ok, I got one. It took a *long* time, and I (stupidly) didn't grab the error state (too tired after 24 hours of flight/travel), but it definitely happened while running a apt-get upgrade after a long time, while at the same time browsing photos from my travel. Let's say, the situation as wastely improved, but is not perfect. I will try to get the error state as soon as I hit it again. Norbert -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081009 Title: [arrandale] GPU lockup IPEHR: 0x0222 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1081009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1055030] Re: 12.10 should be released with gWaei 3.6.x
On Do, 03 Jan 2013, Zachary Dovel wrote: gWaei 3.6.2 is out. The localized menus are back and a few other things have been polished up. It would be nice if this could be used in 12.4 and 12.10 instead of the version that isn't running at all. :-/ 3.6.2-1 has been uploaded to Debian/unstable. Ubuntu will probably pull the version from experimental soon. Norbert PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1055030 Title: 12.10 should be released with gWaei 3.6.x To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwaei/+bug/1055030/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1081009]
(In reply to comment #122) Created attachment 72022 [details] [review] Only evict the blocks required to free the hole (In reply to comment #121) Indeed, patchwork 1896161 from comment 111 does not compile. It's just based on a slightly more recent tree. Meta-patch: s/__drm/drm/ Ok. seems to work very stable now. I am running now a few days with the patches xf86-intel driver and this patch (#122), and didn't have any hiccups at all. Thanks a lot Norbert -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081009 Title: [arrandale] GPU lockup IPEHR: 0x0222 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1081009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 707931] Re: info can not find Top node (it_IT.UTF-8 Italian locale)
Hi both of you, thanks, that is good. On Fr, 28 Dez 2012, FabioS wrote: po/id.po po/it.po po/rw.po po/tr.po Since these files are not modified in the Debian patches, this is definitely an upstream issue, still present in 4.13.92. Since I am leaving for holiday without computer, can you please: * go to https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/texinfo/ * select Bugs and add a bug that refers to this? In any case I will forward your emails to the bug texinfo mailing list, too. Norbert PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707931 Title: info can not find Top node (it_IT.UTF-8 Italian locale) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texinfo/+bug/707931/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 707931] (Fwd) info can not find Top node (it_IT.UTF-8 Italian locale)
Hi Karl, there is a long standing bug hanging around at https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707931 where the generated dir file is broken due to some .po files being wrong. THe users confirmed that it is also present int the latest prelrelease (Debian package) There are many things discussed there, but these two items are open: * issue with tab character, reported at comment #8, is fixed in texinfo.po but not in mainstream it.po * both the files show the same bug regarding wrong control character (^_ instead of \x1f see #3, #8 and following). [..] and further explanation ... Looking at the source package from Debian experimental, a quick grep shows which translations do not include the special control character: grep -c $'\x1f' po/*.po | grep ':1$' Excluding the de_AT and hu locales, which currently aren't translating the above mentioned message, these locales are still affected from the bug: po/id.po po/it.po po/rw.po po/tr.po Since these files are not modified in the Debian patches, this is definitely an upstream issue, still present in 4.13.92. Maybe this can be fixed at some stage ... thanks Norbert PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707931 Title: info can not find Top node (it_IT.UTF-8 Italian locale) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texinfo/+bug/707931/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 707931] Re: info can not find Top node (it_IT.UTF-8 Italian locale)
On Do, 27 Dez 2012, FabioS wrote: Same issue in quantal (tab char was fixed in translation, but special ctrl char still wrong). Instead of reiterating things, can please one of the affected users grab texinfo from Debian/*experimental* which contains the beta version for the next release and let me know if the problem is fixed or what else needs to be done? Then I could inform upstream and ask them to do some changes, but not with the current version in Ubuntu. Thanks Norbert PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/707931 Title: info can not find Top node (it_IT.UTF-8 Italian locale) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texinfo/+bug/707931/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1081009]
(In reply to comment #115) (In reply to comment #114) Yes, it is xf86-video-intel. I am running it with the current version of Debian/sid + this patch now (2.20.14-1 + the patch) Is it a standalone patch or does it depend on the former DRM patch? Anyway, I have tested it with 3.7.1 + i915.i915_enable_rc6=1 and it still triggers the hang check thingey as before. (without enabling rc6 it does not do that) the rc6 needs to be disabled *in*any*case*, that is known by now. And it is a standalone patch of xf86-video-intel. Did you recompile it? [reply to comment 111] I tried to apply https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1896161/ on top of vanilla v3.7.1, but I could not get it to compile: Hmm, I have compiled it with 3.7.0 git kernel without a problem, some offset while patching but that was all. I got some offset issues too, but it failed to compile at all because the function was not defined. Did you really apply the patch to the right source tree? Huuu? Are you sure? I checked my git commit log and it is kernel 3.7 tag of Linus, then the merge into my git repo, and then the patch. Nothing else. I guess you are running something else. Norbert -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081009 Title: [arrandale] GPU lockup IPEHR: 0x0222 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1081009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1081009]
(In reply to comment #122) It's just based on a slightly more recent tree. Meta-patch: s/__drm/drm/ Thanks, rebooting now with new kernel (and still patched intel xf86 driver) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081009 Title: [arrandale] GPU lockup IPEHR: 0x0222 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1081009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1081009]
Hi Daniel, hi Chris (In reply to comment #107) Created attachment 71805 [details] [review] make the shrinker less aggressive Duct-tape solution if it is one, but imo very much worth a try. There have been a lot of patches floating around, but I was running 3.7.0 plus this patch now for a while, and using UXA (*not* using SNA, with SNA it always was fine). I did not hit any problem till now, although I did heavy IO stuff as usual (svn up and git svn rebase on two 6+Gb repos), etc. Chris: What should I do next? You have posted two patches (108 and 109 comments), should I try both, or each on independently? Or is the information that patch from 107 is fine (till now) enough? Please let me know, and thanks for your work on that, and Merry Christmas! Norbert -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081009 Title: [arrandale] GPU lockup IPEHR: 0x0222 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1081009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1081009]
(In reply to comment #119) I saw that, but I have a symbol with a __ prefix. Aren't these created by the compiler ??? Looking at the comments, there are two versions of that patch. comment 105 and comment 111 (v3). I guess you applied the earlier one? Chris, can you Indeed ... indeed ... I don't know why, but checking not the git log I wrote, but the actual diff I see that it is the patchwork patch from 105 ... ok, trying the other one now... Norbert -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081009 Title: [arrandale] GPU lockup IPEHR: 0x0222 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1081009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1081009]
[/usr/src/git-kernel/linux-2.6] grep -rn drm_mm_hole_node_end Binary file drivers/gpu/drm/drm.ko matches ... drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c:126: unsigned long hole_end = drm_mm_hole_node_end(hole_node); drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c:210: unsigned long hole_end = drm_mm_hole_node_end(hole_node); ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081009 Title: [arrandale] GPU lockup IPEHR: 0x0222 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1081009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1081009]
Hi, I will try the patch from 109 in combination with the patchwork patch next. I think I *did* try the patchwork test recently. So I will go silent now and report back in a few days if no problems arose, or immediately if it freezes again. Thanks Norbert -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081009 Title: [arrandale] GPU lockup IPEHR: 0x0222 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1081009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1081009]
(In reply to comment #113) [reply to comment 109] Do I need to apply this to xf86-video-intel? If yes, which version/commit? Yes, it is xf86-video-intel. I am running it with the current version of Debian/sid + this patch now (2.20.14-1 + the patch) [reply to comment 111] I tried to apply https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1896161/ on top of vanilla v3.7.1, but I could not get it to compile: Hmm, I have compiled it with 3.7.0 git kernel without a problem, some offset while patching but that was all. Norbert -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081009 Title: [arrandale] GPU lockup IPEHR: 0x0222 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1081009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1081009]
(In reply to comment #120) Looking at the comments, there are two versions of that patch. comment 105 and comment 111 (v3). I guess you applied the earlier one? Chris, can you Indeed ... indeed ... I don't know why, but checking not the git log I wrote, but the actual diff I see that it is the patchwork patch from 105 ... ok, trying the other one now... Indeed, patchwork 1896161 from comment 111 does not compile. Norbert -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081009 Title: [arrandale] GPU lockup IPEHR: 0x0222 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1081009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1081009]
Hi Chris, (In reply to comment #90) (In reply to comment #89) First report on SNA: I got a very very strange thing yesterday. After resuming from suspend-to-ram I continued working with GIMP on some graphics, and first it started with some blue flashes on the screen, and finally the screen got completely blue, but I could in principle still interact with the windows, just without seeing anything. Interesting, certainly the first I've heard of such. Can you see if it is possible to capture it in a screenshot, or failing that a photograph, and please open a bug report for it. sorry for the late reply, I was on a trip. Since it only happened once and on some rc kernels I leave it for now, but a screenshot is not necessary, it was simply monocolor blue ... nothing else ;-) Another thing: I have now tried to hit the bug with SNA for a long time, without *any* success. As soon as I switched back to IXA the bug was triggered within short time. Does this help you? Norbert -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081009 Title: [arrandale] GPU lockup IPEHR: 0x0222 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1081009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1081009]
(In reply to comment #93) Norbert, a quick scan of the bug report doesn't yield any information as to whether you tested the mb() theory. Can you please try: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~ickle/linux-2.6 #master Comment 74 and 75 seem to indicate that I tried at least a subset. Do you want me to try it with the full branch? Norbert -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081009 Title: [arrandale] GPU lockup IPEHR: 0x0222 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1081009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1081009]
First report on SNA: I got a very very strange thing yesterday. After resuming from suspend-to-ram I continued working with GIMP on some graphics, and first it started with some blue flashes on the screen, and finally the screen got completely blue, but I could in principle still interact with the windows, just without seeing anything. Restarting X (gdm) did fix it for me. Doing more heavy IO to stress test SNA. Norbert -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081009 Title: [arrandale] GPU lockup IPEHR: 0x0222 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1081009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1081009]
Created attachment 70855 i915 error state, rc6=0, patch from comment 79 Hi Chris, sorry to say it, but I got a hang today. In the background some update.mlocate etc was running, plus some git checkout of a big repository. i915 error state uploaded. Norbert -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081009 Title: [arrandale] GPU lockup IPEHR: 0x0222 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1081009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1081009]
Hi Chris, ok, will switch to SNA, although in one of the email threads predating this bug report I switched to SNA and then was told not to. Anyway, trying to recreate it with SNA. Norbert -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081009 Title: [arrandale] GPU lockup IPEHR: 0x0222 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1081009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1084789] Re: package texlive-binaries 2012.20120628-3build1 [modified: usr/bin/dvips usr/share/man/man1/dvips.1.gz] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script re
Then also purge multex-bin
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
On 2012/12/03, at 18:55, Paul Judd sukiipo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 00:07 +, Norbert Preining wrote:
On So, 02 Dez 2012, Paul Judd wrote:
dpkg: error processing texlive-science (--configure):
dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of jtex-base:
You cannot have jtex* installed,
dpkg --purge jtex-base jtex-bin
is necessary.
jtex has not been fixed and will probably not be fixed.
I wrote that already ... anyone reading my emails?
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
STOKE POGES (n.)
The tapping moments of an index finger on glass made by a person
futilely attempting to communicate with either a tropical fish or a
post office clerk.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
output of sudo dpkg --purge jtex-base jtex-bin
[sudo] password for paul:
dpkg: dependency problems prevent removal of jtex-base:
multex-bin depends on jtex-base (= 2.1).
dpkg: error processing jtex-base (--purge):
dependency problems - not removing
(Reading database ... 790528 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing jtex-bin ...
mktexlsr: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R...
mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXLIVEMAIN...
mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXLIVEDIST...
mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN...
mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R...
mktexlsr: Done.
Purging configuration files for jtex-bin ...
Processing triggers for man-db ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
jtex-base
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Debian
TeX Maintainers, which is subscribed to texlive-bin in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1084789
Title:
package texlive-binaries 2012.20120628-3build1 [modified:
usr/bin/dvips usr/share/man/man1/dvips.1.gz] failed to
install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script
returned error exit status 1
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-bin/+bug/1084789/+subscriptions
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1084789
Title:
package texlive-binaries 2012.20120628-3build1 [modified:
usr/bin/dvips usr/share/man/man1/dvips.1.gz] failed to
install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script
returned error exit status 1
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-bin/+bug/1084789/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1085649] Re: [Bug 1055030] Re: 12.10 should be released with gWaei 3.6.x
Application menu should be accessible in top panel, but it's not
showing.
This is a bug that is well known.
The author pointed it out to Ubuntu devs.
I uploaded specifically for Ubuntu a version of gwaei to Debian/experimental
that would fit Ubuntu, but Ubuntu devs did decide to *NOT* pull a properly
working version, but included a broken version instead.
Nothing can be done but blaiming Ubuntu developers for ignoring these bugs.
It was all well known and stated well before Ubuntu went into freeze.
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
SWANAGE (pl.n.)
Swanage is the series of diversionary tactics used when trying to
cover up the existence of a glossop (q.v.) and may include (a)
uttering a high-pitched laugh and pointing out of the window (NB. this
doesn't work more that twice); (b) sneezing as loudly as possible and
wiping the glossop off the table in the same movement as whipping out
your handkerchief; (c) saying 'Christ! I seen to have dropped some
shit on your table' (very unwise); (d) saying 'Christ, who did that?'
(better) (e) pressing your elbow on the glossop itself and working
your arms slowly to the edge of the table; (f) leaving the glossop
where it is but moving a plate over it and putting up with sitting at
an uncomfortable angle the rest of the meal; or, if the glossop is in
too exposed a position, (g) leaving it there unremarked except for the
occasional humorous glance.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1085649
Title:
gWaei's application menu not showing in Ubuntu 12.10
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwaei/+bug/1085649/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1084789] Re: package texlive-binaries 2012.20120628-3build1 [modified: usr/bin/dvips usr/share/man/man1/dvips.1.gz] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script re
On Sa, 01 Dez 2012, Paul Judd wrote:
This is JTeXk, Version 2.1, based on TeXk Version 3.141592 (Web2C 7.5.4)
(INITEX)
%-line parsing enabled.
! I can't find file `jtex.ini'.
* jtex.ini
jlatex etc is not compatible with TL2012. Sorry.
jtex-bin cannot be compiled with libkpathsea5 and upward.
We tried to get it working again, but there was not much of interest
of it.
Please purge jtex-bin and jtex-base.
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
TAROOM (vb.)
To make loud noises during the night to let the burglars know you are
in.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1084789
Title:
package texlive-binaries 2012.20120628-3build1 [modified:
usr/bin/dvips usr/share/man/man1/dvips.1.gz] failed to
install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script
returned error exit status 1
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-bin/+bug/1084789/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1084789] Re: package texlive-binaries 2012.20120628-3build1 [modified: usr/bin/dvips usr/share/man/man1/dvips.1.gz] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script re
On So, 02 Dez 2012, Paul Judd wrote:
dpkg: error processing texlive-science (--configure):
dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of jtex-base:
You cannot have jtex* installed,
dpkg --purge jtex-base jtex-bin
is necessary.
jtex has not been fixed and will probably not be fixed.
I wrote that already ... anyone reading my emails?
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
STOKE POGES (n.)
The tapping moments of an index finger on glass made by a person
futilely attempting to communicate with either a tropical fish or a
post office clerk.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1084789
Title:
package texlive-binaries 2012.20120628-3build1 [modified:
usr/bin/dvips usr/share/man/man1/dvips.1.gz] failed to
install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script
returned error exit status 1
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-bin/+bug/1084789/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1081009]
Chris, please let us know on top of what? On top of the bug55984 git branch you created earlier, or is that one not necessary? Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081009 Title: [arrandale] GPU lockup IPEHR: 0x0222 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1081009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1081009]
Hi Chris, No news... Has the instadeath gone, but the slow lingering death remains? Well, I am running the latest patch on top of git and try to trigger the bug, till now without success, though. I cannot say more or less, at least the frequency has reduced. Let me know if I can help more than just trying to trigger it again. Norbert -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081009 Title: [arrandale] GPU lockup IPEHR: 0x0222 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1081009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1081009]
Hi Chris, I am now running with http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~ickle/linux-2.6/log/?h=for-imre pulled into main linux git. The first thing I realized that there are some very strange effects happening: I have docky (a panel) running, and set to auto-hide. If it is shown, then there are boxes around *some* of the icons there. And if the docky panel is going into hiding mode, then a nice green bar appears across my screen. Is this a known problem? Should I report it somewhere? I have made two screenshots showing the effects, should I upload them here or somewhere else? Now I do some testing with these patches Norbert -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081009 Title: [arrandale] GPU lockup IPEHR: 0x0222 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1081009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1081009]
(In reply to comment #72) Script to trigger the bug. This seems to be quickest way to repro the bug on Ville's ILK I couldn't trigger anything with that, it just happily continued for ages. Here it seems that big IO for read and write to be necessary, while here is only read. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081009 Title: [arrandale] GPU lockup IPEHR: 0x0222 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1081009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1081009]
Running current linux HEAD with http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~ickle/linux-2.6/commit/?h=bug55984 pulled in I cannot trigger the crash, how hard I have tried now for some time. Compared with the for-imre branch also the strange artifacts are gone, so it looks much better now. I have still the following boot cmd line: i915.i915_enable_rc6=0 i915.enable_hangcheck=0 I will do more testing, of course Norbert -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081009 Title: [arrandale] GPU lockup IPEHR: 0x0222 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1081009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1081009]
Okay, I guess I have to recall my statement, I didn't realize it at first. Due to the i915.enable_hangcheck=0 it seemss that not simply the 3d died and Gnome3 WM died, but with this the screen went black and didn't react on anything. Interestingly there were no messages at all in the log files. I could SysRq the computer, and the logfiles showed activity, but the screen remain black. I guess that is the sign of a hang. Pity. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081009 Title: [arrandale] GPU lockup IPEHR: 0x0222 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1081009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1071760] Re: On upgrade to 12.10, my pdflatex documents come out in A4 size, not letter
On Di, 20 Nov 2012, Christopher Barrington-Leigh wrote:
$ pdflatex -recorder tmp1
From your run ..
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.4-1.40.13 (TeX Live 2012/Debian)
restricted \write18 enabled.
entering extended mode
(./tmp1.tex
LaTeX2e 2011/06/27
Babel v3.8m and hyphenation patterns for english, dumylang,
nohyphenation, fr
ench, basque, loaded.
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/article.cls
Document Class: article 2007/10/19 v1.4h Standard LaTeX document class
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/size10.clo))
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/geometry/geometry.sty
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/graphics/keyval.sty)
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/oberdiek/ifpdf.sty)
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/oberdiek/ifvtex.sty)
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/ifxetex/ifxetex.sty)
(/home/cpbl/texmf/tex/maybeMissing/geometry/geometry.cfg)) (./tmp1.aux)
^
what does this file say? Maybe by chance something about A4???
I tried it on my computer and the documents come out in letter
without any problem.
Is it so hard to read the output?
Bug can be closed, misconfiguration of the user.
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
FORDTell me Arthur...
ARTHUR Yes?
FORDThis boulder we're stuck under, how big would you say it was? Roughly?
ARTHUR Oh, about the size of Coventry Cathedral.
FORDDo you think we could move it? (Arthur doesn't reply) Just asking.
--- Ford and Arthur in a tricky situation, Fit the Eighth.
--- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1071760
Title:
On upgrade to 12.10, my pdflatex documents come out in A4 size, not
letter
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-base/+bug/1071760/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 866096] Re: upgrade texi2dvi
Will be updated with the release of a new texinfo package which is in
testing phase.
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
On 2012/11/19, at 17:22, Launchpad Bug Tracker
866...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: texinfo (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to texinfo
in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/866096
Title:
upgrade texi2dvi
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texinfo/+bug/866096/+subscriptions
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/866096
Title:
upgrade texi2dvi
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texinfo/+bug/866096/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1071760] Re: On upgrade to 12.10, my pdflatex documents come out in A4 size, not letter
On Mo, 19 Nov 2012, Christopher Barrington-Leigh wrote:
/usr/bin/paperconf
gives me:
letter
But that's not what I get when I use the geometry package without
specifying a paper size.
Do you have a geometry.cfg hanging around?
Run one document (Hellow World one) with -recorder and send the .fls
file
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
`We've got to find out what people want from fire, how
they relate to it, what sort of image it has for them.'
The crowd were tense. They were expecting something
wonderful from Ford.
`Stick it up your nose,' he said.
`Which is precisely the sort of thing we need to know,'
insisted the girl, `Do people want fire that can be fitted
nasally?'
--- Ford debating what to do with fire with a marketing
--- girl.
--- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1071760
Title:
On upgrade to 12.10, my pdflatex documents come out in A4 size, not
letter
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-base/+bug/1071760/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1074169] Re: function keys not working [lenovo]
I had the same problem and found the following working solution: shut down, unplug power, take out battery, wait a few minutes, boot. Seems to be a bios bug in lenovos. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1074169 Title: function keys not working [lenovo] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1074169/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1005710] Re: Please update Texlive
On Di, 30 Okt 2012, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
But if you think 280 other affected people's opinion is not important as
long as TL 2009 doesn't bother yourself, please spare me.
I told you, I am the one packaging, and also upstream developing.
So don't deduce any wrong conclusions.
I admit that I've noticed the TL issue just for several months, for
this bug I just clicked affects and subscribed it.
Did you read through the bug report, in full length?
Most of the things you are saying have been stated before at lenght,
and answered at length.
I think other community member or I may or may not try solving this
issue in some random day later, that's it.
Ahh, and for 3 years all those people never found the time to eve
contribute *1* *ONE* line of code?
You are a great believer!
I'm just annoyed by the WONTFIX and Please Upgrade attitude. I'm sorry
if you feel insulted.
Because that is the fact. Simply. There is a reason why there is
a feature freeze, and stable update procedure.
A company installing XYZ on their computers don't necessarily care
for the newest, but for stability. Introducing a big bunch of changes
in the last minute is simply a no-go in software dev. If you don't know
about soft ware dev, please trust us.
If none of us are really trying to solve the issue itself, why we need
to make noise here?
So - tell me - tell me *ONE* name who contributed anything?
Ok, let us see, since you are sooo persistent bugger, let us go down
to facts, simple facts.
If you understand the following thing, then I guess you should
know the answer to your question on how many have contributed:
$ svn log ~/debian/svn/texlive2012 | grep '^r[0-9]' | awk -F\| '{print$2}' |
sort | uniq -c
21 frank
11 hilmar-guest
332 preining
1 uwabami-guest
Now ... who of the many hundreds you have mentioned is listed there?
End of the line. I don't need to waste my time more with you.
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
BRADWORTHY
One who is skilled in the art of naming loaves.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1005710
Title:
Please update Texlive
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-base/+bug/1005710/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1073345] [NEW] slashbox.sty is missing
On Di, 30 Okt 2012, Sébastien Le Maguer wrote:
slashbox.sty seems to be missing in the quantal texlive-latex-extra.
slashbox was removed from TeX Live snce there is no license
info and the author is uncontactable, thus we have to deduce that
the package is undistributable.
Please anyone close this bug.
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
PIDDLETRENTHIDE (n.)
A trouser stain caused by a wimbledon (q.v.). Not to be confused with
a botley (q.v.)
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073345
Title:
slashbox.sty is missing
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-extra/+bug/1073345/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1005710] Re: Please update Texlive
Ma,
On Di, 30 Okt 2012, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
The only thing annoyed me here is that you don't even acknowledge the broken
state and do something non-constructive:
Can you please specify *what* is broken.
I am the one responsible for these packages. I package them in Debian,
from where they are pulled into Ubuntu.
I myself used for long time TL2009, up to this years March when I
started packaging 2012.
I am writing a lot of LaTeX for my work.
So tell me, besides it is not the newest released version, what
is broken?
And if you have sooo much interest, you could have helped packaging
TeX Live already in the last 3 years?!
Insulting here developers who do this work in the free time,
voluntarily, is not proper behaviour. I don't know where you are
from, but where I am living, in Japan, this is called very very
inpolite behaviour, and people feel ashamed for it.
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
BRYMBO
The single unappetising bun left in a baker's shop after four p.m.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1005710
Title:
Please update Texlive
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-base/+bug/1005710/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1071760] [NEW] On upgrade to 12.10, my pdflatex documents come out in A4 size, not letter
Hi Christopher
with TeX Live 2012, tex etc honors the setting of paperconf. Please
check that there you have letter selected!
Norbert
(how happy one could be if letter just simply disappeared)
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1071760
Title:
On upgrade to 12.10, my pdflatex documents come out in A4 size, not
letter
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-base/+bug/1071760/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1064222] Re: Sync texlive-base 2012.20120611-5 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
Hi,
On Di, 09 Okt 2012, Barry Warsaw wrote:
There are quite a few reverse-depends. While from the description, it
doesn't seem like this new release would break any of those, we are
quite close to the release, so this is a risky sync. Does this fix
specific bugs in Ubuntu? Would it be better to upload this to quantal-
The bugs are both in Debian and Ubuntu. Even if they have not been
reported in Ubuntu, an upgrade from the previous release of Ubuntu
you will see the same problems of conffiles getting lost.
Read the bug report mentioned in the changelog, Andreas Beckmann is
doing piuparts upgrade tests. And since the last released versions
of the TeX Live packages are the same in Debian and Ubuntu, you will
suffer from the same problems.
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
SLIGO (n.)
An unnamed and exotic sexual act which people like to believe that
famous films stars get up to in private. 'To commit sligo.'
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1064222
Title:
Sync texlive-base 2012.20120611-5 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-base/+bug/1064222/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1064222] Re: Sync texlive-base 2012.20120611-5 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
Please prepare this update for SRU Not me, anyone else is free to. Norbert -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1064222 Title: Sync texlive-base 2012.20120611-5 (main) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-base/+bug/1064222/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1055030] [NEW] 12.10 should be released with gWaei 3.6.x
On So, 23 Sep 2012, Zachary Dovel wrote:
3.6.x is specially made to work with Unity and its global menu. 3.6.1
should be coming though the pipeline on the Debian repositories soon.
3.6.1-1 uploaded this minute, should be available in the experimental
archive of Debian after the next run of the archive scripts.
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
WIKE (vb.)
To rip a piece of sticky plaster off your skin as fast as possible in
the hope that it will (a) show how brave you are, and (b) not hurt.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1055030
Title:
12.10 should be released with gWaei 3.6.x
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwaei/+bug/1055030/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 971240] Re: Won't load in 12.04 (beta 2)
Hi Zach,
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Zachary Dovel wrote:
I have most of the issues fixed now on the git repo. Just trying to
reproduce the mecab issue again. For some reason I can't now. Expect a
release this weekend. :D
Great, looking forward to it! Let me know when you release a new
version.
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live and Debian Developer
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
CLIXBY (adj.)
Politely rude. Briskly vague. Firmly uninformative.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971240
Title:
Won't load in 12.04 (beta 2)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwaei/+bug/971240/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 971240] Re: Won't load in 12.04 (beta 2)
hi Zack, I am seeing 3 issues still. I'll check later when I'm back from dinner. Crashes when running with no ipadic installed crashes? I didn't have it installed, so morphologic analysis didn't work, but I could use gwaei otherwise. Changing the menubar causes a crash (which happens when you open the vocabulary window) What do you mean with changing the menubar? The last 2 are caused by all these new menu systems everybody is using and they are not very stable yet. (Things crash in the api that should not.) Yes, we all know that all that horrible gnome3 thing is mostly PITA, and I mean *really* PITASS!!! I have filed alteady so many bugs against Debian g3 packages, but it is a waste. My feeling is that this is the end of Gnome, they are pissing of to many users. Norbert -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971240 Title: Won't load in 12.04 (beta 2) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwaei/+bug/971240/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 971240] Re: Won't load in 12.04 (beta 2)
Hi This seems to be an ubuntu issue (I was able to reproduce) which I am going to try to fix in the C code Ok It is unrelated to the deb configuration though you could make it not crash by forcing the dictionary as a requre. Right. I got the dictionary shortcuts working last night with gtk_application_add_accelerator(). So do you release a new version? Shoild I make the dict a depends in the next version or do you also fix that crash in thd code? Thanks Norbert The function was only just recently documented on http://developer.gnome.org/gtk3/3.5/GtkApplication.html though it exists in 3.4 too. -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971240 Title: Won't load in 12.04 (beta 2) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwaei/+bug/971240/+subscriptions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971240 Title: Won't load in 12.04 (beta 2) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwaei/+bug/971240/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 971240] Re: Won't load in 12.04 (beta 2)
hi Just a note: for 12.04 you need to also install libmecab2 from the Debian repository. I think that is because the dependencies are only recommends, and when you download and install from cmd line it ignores recommends. The morhpology stuff crashes, probably because I don't have any of that installed, but that's a minor thing. Yes I saw that, too. But still the rest is usable, right? Would make sense to check on startup and warn the user that morphological analysis is disabled due to missing bits'n'pieces? Norbert -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971240 Title: Won't load in 12.04 (beta 2) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwaei/+bug/971240/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1048994] [NEW] apt-get error caused by Tex Live 2012
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 987096 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/987096
Hi everyone,
two remarks only
On Di, 11 Sep 2012, Apport retracing service wrote:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 987096 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/987096
No, this is not a duplicated.
At the OP:
On Di, 11 Sep 2012, John John Doe wrote:
I am running TeX Live 2012 on Ubuntu Precise. For the installation I
You are running non Debian/Ubuntu packges but installed upstream.
followed this tutorial (http://weblog.avp-ptr.de/20120710/how-to-
manually-install-tex-live-2012/). Yesterday, I updated the packages
Which is about as unclear as possible.
$ sudo tlmgr --gui
Which is not a Debian/Ubuntu program.
texconfig: unknown option `paperconf' given as argument for `texconfig
dvips'
Well, you have messed up system installation from Ubuntu and your
private TeX Live upstream installation, and broke it. Not surprising
if you don't know what you are doing.
It seems to me that you have added the TeX Live path (.../2012/x64_64-linux)
to the *FRONT* of the PATH of *root* (or all users).
Well, that will break... since upstream texconfig does not understand
the paperconf, this is a Debian/Ubuntu thing.
But this is as expected, you shouldn't do this for root ...
Assume for a moment that we in TeX Live ship a binary called 'ls'
that destroys your partition table and deletes your user data etc?
Now then you let it run as root and ther we go.
PLease someone closes this bug, it is a misconfiguration done by the user,
and has nothing to do with either Debuan/Ubuntu, nor with TeX Live
upstream. THere is nothing we can do on any of these sides.
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
ARTICLAVE (n.)
A clever architectural construction designed to give the illusion from
the top deck of a bus that it is far too big for the road.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1048994
Title:
apt-get error caused by Tex Live 2012
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-base/+bug/1048994/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1045516] ulqda and Digest::SHA(1)
Hi Ivan,
thanks for your work on ulqda. Recently a bug was reported to
the Ubuntu bug tracker, but it is the same in many other
distributions is my guess:
On Mon, 03 Sep 2012, Steven Goodpaster wrote:
I'm trying to use ChemFig (included with texlive-science) to draw a
chemical's structural formula within a LaTeX document. It appears to
depend on a now depreciated/removed libdigest-sha1-perl, when it should
instead depend on its replacement libdigest-sha-perl. I'm using version
texlive-science 2012.20120611-1~ubuntu12.04.1
And that is true, it calls
use Digest::SHA1 ...
which is not available in at least Debian and Ubuntu, but has been
replaced by Digest::SHA.
I would suggest adding instead the following code to the
script which makes it run with both SHA1 and SHA:
eval { require Digest::SHA1; };
if ($@) {
require Digest::SHA;
Digest::SHA-import(qw(sha1 sha1_hex sha1_base64));
print loadins SHA...\n;
} else {
Digest::SHA1-import(qw(sha1 sha1_hex sha1_base64));
}
Thanks for considering this item.
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live and Debian Developer
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
He dropped his voice still lower. In the stillness, a fly
would not have dared cleat its throat.
--- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045516
Title:
texlive-science 2012 depends on depreciated/removed libdigest-
sha1-perl
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-extra/+bug/1045516/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 712521] Re: [Needs packaging] TeXLive 2011
Please close this bug, TeX Live 2012 is already packaged and in Ubuntu.
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
** Tags removed: apport-bug i386 natty running-unity
** Tags added: precise
** Summary changed:
- [Needs packaging] TeXLive 2011
+ [needs-packaging] Latest TeXLive
** Tags added: natty oneiric
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: texlive-base
- Oneiric's repositories still feature TeXLive 2009 only. This package is
- very outdated and should be updated to the upcoming TeXLive 2011 before
- the release of 11.10.
-
- ProblemType: Bug
- DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
- Package: texlive-full (not installed)
- ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-1.28-generic 2.6.38-rc2
- Uname: Linux 2.6.38-1-generic i686
- NonfreeKernelModules: wl
- Architecture: i386
- Date: Thu Feb 3 15:55:45 2011
- InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Alpha i386 (20110122)
- ProcEnviron:
- LANGUAGE=en_US:en
- LANG=en_US.UTF-8
- LC_MESSAGES=en_US.utf8
- SHELL=/bin/bash
- SourcePackage: texlive-base
+ Natty's, Oneiric's and Precise's repositories still feature TeXLive 2009
+ only. This package is very outdated and should be updated to more recent
+ version of TeXLive.
** Summary changed:
- [needs-packaging] Latest TeXLive
+ [needs-packaging] Upgrade TeXLive for 11.04, 11.10, 12.04 LTS
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Debian
TeX Maintainers, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/712521
Title:
[needs-packaging] Upgrade TeXLive for 11.04, 11.10, 12.04 LTS
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/tex-live/+bug/712521/+subscriptions
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live and Debian Developer
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
UPOTTERY (n.)
That part of a kitchen cupboard which contains an unnecessarily large
number of milk jugs.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/712521
Title:
[needs-packaging] Upgrade TeXLive for 11.04, 11.10, 12.04 LTS
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/tex-live/+bug/712521/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 712521] Re: [needs-packaging] Upgrade TeXLive for 11.04, 11.10, 12.04 LTS
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
This bug should NOT be regarded as Fixed.
We do not live in future!
I don't care. I have packaged it for Debian. What Ubuntu does is
Ubuntu's.
But you have to live with the following facts:
- TeX Live 2012 hit Ubuntu *after* the release of 11.04
- Updates are normally confined to security updates
- 11.10 will contain TL 2012
THat is life ... you can always install TeX Live from tug.org!
If every bug fix is landed in the next release, what's the meaning
of so-called LTS release?
Security?
Stability?
Nobody said newest software!
So, PLEASE, do backports of TeXLive in official repositories.
The maintainer should already see how many people want such upgrades.
Hahahahaha ... Ubuntu maintainers? They take what is in Debian and add
a few fixes for Ubuntu. The last contribution from Ubuntu was poppler
patches long time ago.
No, Ubuntu users have to live with what I am packaging, and if it is
too late for Ubuntu, it is too late for Ubuntu. Nothing will change.
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live and Debian Developer
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
KERRY (n.)
The small twist of skin which separated each sausage on a string.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/712521
Title:
[needs-packaging] Upgrade TeXLive for 11.04, 11.10, 12.04 LTS
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/tex-live/+bug/712521/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 591140] Re: where is tlmgr?!?!
On Fr, 03 Aug 2012, Dražen Lučanin wrote:
But if there can't be a separate packaging system, how come we can
normally use easy_install or pip for Python packages? What method did
I have no idea what easy_install and pip are and what they are doing,
I assume installing into /usr/local.
I have seen somewhere a wrapper/patch for tlmgr that does something
similar, but I don't want to develop it myself.
Everyone is invited to work on that and send me patches.
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
BELPER
A knob of someone else's chewing gum which you unexpectedly find your
hand resting on under a deck's top, under the passenger seat of your
car or on somebody's thigh under their skirt.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591140
Title:
where is tlmgr?!?!
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-base/+bug/591140/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1023485] [NEW] package install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-8ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127
Title: package install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-8ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127 Hahahahaha, funnny You are removing an *essential* package with --force (bash) and expect that this is a good idea Hahahaha Ubuntu people, please close this bug, I can't stop laughing about the submitter. Norbert -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1023485 Title: package install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-8ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texinfo/+bug/1023485/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1005884] [NEW] texlive-latex3 description should contain name of the included latex packages
On Di, 29 Mai 2012, Frédéric Grosshans wrote:
All the *.sty files from th MH bundle should be listed, that is : breqn,
empheq, flexisym, mathstyle, mathtools, mhsetup and xfrac.
Sure enough ... let's see what that would mean ... doing the same for
texlive-latex-extra
Current dpkg --info length: 877 lines (the longst in the archive I assume)
Number of sty files contained: 1204
Adding this up we would have *quite* a long description.
Sorry, forget this proposal and learn to use dlocate/grep/etc
(or the web site for seaching within packages!)
Enjoy
Norbert
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
SCROGGS (n.)
The stout pubic hairs which protrude from your helping of moussaka in
a cheap Greek restaurant.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1005884
Title:
texlive-latex3 description should contain name of the included latex
packages
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-extra/+bug/1005884/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 244043] Re: pdflatex produces A4 page despite the fact that letterpaper is specified
On Mo, 14 Mai 2012, Petru wrote:
confirmed using XeTeX 3.1415926-2.3-0.9997.6 (TeX Live 2012/dev/Debian)
File contents:
\documentclass[b5paper]{article}
\begin{document}
sdaf
\end{document}
The resulting pdf is not b5paper, it is a4paper
Please learn to use google. Thanks.
That is one of the most asked questions ... you need to use
geometry or something else that sets the pdf paper size. LaTeX does not
know about pdf paper sizes.
Please someone closes this bug, PBCAS.
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
BURWASH
The pleasurable cool sloosh of puddle water over the toes of your
gumboots.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244043
Title:
pdflatex produces A4 page despite the fact that letterpaper is
specified
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-base/+bug/244043/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 830370] Re: epspdf: dependency on ruby missing in texlive-pictures
There are a lot of different things in texlive-picture, epspdf being one of it only. ruby is already a *recommends*. If you decided to *not* install recommends, which are installed normally by default, it is up to you to deal with that. From my side (as maintainer of the Debian packages) I will not change anything here as I consider this bug invalid. Norbert -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/830370 Title: epspdf: dependency on ruby missing in texlive-pictures To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-base/+bug/830370/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 996975] Re: packageinstall-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-8ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: 子进程 已安装 post-installation 脚本 返回了错误号1
On Mi, 09 Mai 2012, xiaolingzhu wrote:
Thus, the system can be robust enough and change it to the original
version configuration when it does not work fine afer users' modifying.
ANd how shoud that work? If the user puts
sudo rm -rf /
into /etc/environment, then how should the system recover?
I am a chinese user, users like me modifying the configuration via
sudo will cause problems that they don't understand...
Then *WHY* are you doing it if you do not UNDERSTAND it
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
DUNGENESS (n.)
The uneasy feeling that the plastic handles of the overloaded
supermarket carrier bag you are carrying are getting steadily longer.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996975
Title:
package install-info 4.13a.dfsg.1-8ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
子进程 已安装 post-installation 脚本 返回了错误号 1
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texinfo/+bug/996975/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 971240] Re: Won't load in 12.04 (beta 2)
Sorry quick answer from the iphone
I have today uploaded 3.4.3-1 to Debian undtable, so the regular sync will pull
that and close all the problems I hope.
Norbert
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, JapanTeX Live Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
On 2012/04/26, at 18:54, Yvon TANGUY von...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Hi Norbert,
Thank you for your reply.
I saw the patch you have made, but no, it is not sufficient.
Since you have change others things too in your fix-stupid-libgtk
patch, I merged my changes, Zachary Dovel and yours in one patch.
It's time for a gwaei 3.2.0b1-3 version !
Change since gwaei 3.2.0b1.orig:
* Freeze main ui window: fix for stupid libgtk library breaking unrelated
software, needed
otherwise gwaei will never start (see eog bug #665374 for reference)
* Fix no menu display in the unity bar
* Fix French menu translation (' ' instead of '_' for keyboard shortcut)
* Fix statusbar too big (half of the result window)
* Fix crash when a result is not found with one dictionary, and then click on
one button of proposed dictionary
* Fix compile warning, use of deprecated function
To apply this patch:
patch -p0 debian_sid_gwaei-3.2.0b1-3.patch
** Patch added: debian_sid_gwaei-3.2.0b1-3.patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwaei/+bug/971240/+attachment/3104590/+files/debian_sid_gwaei-3.2.0b1-3.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971240
Title:
Won't load in 12.04 (beta 2)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwaei/+bug/971240/+subscriptions
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971240
Title:
Won't load in 12.04 (beta 2)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwaei/+bug/971240/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
