[Bug 507233] Re: NVIDIA - Xorg crashes (empty backtrace) with segfault OR general protection in ld-2.10.1.so
Upgrading to Lucid was unsuccessful, so I did a full install of Alpha 2. This appeared to fix this bug, only to replace it with another. Xorg still crashes with no backtrace, but there is no segfault or general protection on anything. I wouldn't mark this as closed, however, because it may still be related to the same thing. -- NVIDIA - Xorg crashes (empty backtrace) with segfault OR general protection in ld-2.10.1.so https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507233 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 507233] Re: NVIDIA - Xorg crashes (empty backtrace) with segfault OR general protection in ld-2.10.1.so
One more thing I should mention. It is still much more stable than before, however, the instability will also occur on AC. Personally, I feel that the overall stability is more helpful because I use this laptop on battery a lot, but you may think differently. -- NVIDIA - Xorg crashes (empty backtrace) with segfault OR general protection in ld-2.10.1.so https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507233 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 507233] Re: NVIDIA - Xorg crashes (empty backtrace) with segfault OR general protection in ld-2.10.1.so
I was doing a bit more research before a reinstall. ld-2.10.1.so is provided by libc6, for what it's worth. I think I'll try a dist-upgrade first. Maybe something got solved between Karmic and Lucid, and it could be in the Alpha. If that doesn't work I'll try a full reinstall. -- NVIDIA - Xorg crashes (empty backtrace) with segfault OR general protection in ld-2.10.1.so https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507233 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 507233] Re: NVIDIA - Xorg crashes (empty backtrace) with segfault OR general protection in ld-2.10.1.so
And by dist-upgrade I mean update-manager -d. :-P -- NVIDIA - Xorg crashes (empty backtrace) with segfault OR general protection in ld-2.10.1.so https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507233 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 507233] Re: NVIDIA - Xorg crashes (empty backtrace) with segfault OR general protection in ld-2.10.1.so
I think I'll do a fresh install using a Lucid daily build. Maybe it'll be fixed there. Or maybe it'll be fixed by a reinstallation. I hope... -- NVIDIA - Xorg crashes (empty backtrace) with segfault OR general protection in ld-2.10.1.so https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507233 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 507233] Re: NVIDIA - Xorg crashes (empty backtrace) with segfault OR general protection in ld-2.10.1.so
Nice to know I'm not alone in this problem, at least :-). I'm beginning to think it might have something to do with underclocking the GPU when on battery power. It's kind of a stretch, but that does explain why the crash happens more often (or only, in your case) on battery. -- NVIDIA - Xorg crashes (empty backtrace) with segfault OR general protection in ld-2.10.1.so https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507233 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 507233] Re: NVIDIA - Xorg crashes (empty backtrace) with segfault OR general protection in ld-2.10.1.so
I am looking for patterns in the crash, as I know random is a very... vague term. I've noticed that the first crash takes about 20 to 30 minutes. All subsequent crashes occur in under 10 minutes. This pattern lasts until a complete reboot. -- NVIDIA - Xorg crashes (empty backtrace) with segfault OR general protection in ld-2.10.1.so https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507233 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 507233] Re: NVIDIA - Xorg crashes (empty backtrace) with segfault OR general protection in ld-2.10.1.so
The system appears to be much less stable when on battery power. Just a thought. -- NVIDIA - Xorg crashes (empty backtrace) with segfault OR general protection in ld-2.10.1.so https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507233 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 507233] Re: NVIDIA - Xorg crashes (empty backtrace) with segfault OR general protection in ld-2.10.1.so
I would love some help on this, as I am unable to use my computer for very long most of the time. If I need to post anything more, just say the word. -- NVIDIA - Xorg crashes (empty backtrace) with segfault OR general protection in ld-2.10.1.so https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507233 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 507233] [NEW] NVIDIA - Xorg crashes (empty backtrace) with segfault OR general protection in ld-2.10.1.so
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xorg Nvidia binary driver version 185 on a GTX260M. Crashes are seemingly random (anywhere from 30 seconds to 2 hours logged in), but always present with no backtrace in Xorg.0.log.old and either a segfault or general protection in ld-2.10.1.so. 173 driver does not crash, but is excruciatingly slow. I tested the 190 and 195 drivers, but they do not fix the problem. They have been completely removed from the system. Any help would be greatly appreciated. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Jan 13 17:36:12 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release amd64 (20091027) MachineType: Alienware M15x NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: xorg 1:7.4+3ubuntu10 ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.31-18-generic root=UUID=5f861888-1c0e-466e-b0bc-3aa962417bd0 ro quiet splash ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-18.55-generic RelatedPackageVersions: xserver-xorg 1:7.4+3ubuntu10 libgl1-mesa-glx 7.6.0-1ubuntu4 libdrm2 2.4.14-1ubuntu1 xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.9.0-1ubuntu2.1 xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.12.99+git20090929.7968e1fb-0ubuntu1 SourcePackage: xorg Uname: Linux 2.6.31-18-generic x86_64 dmi.bios.date: 11/16/2009 dmi.bios.vendor: Alienware dmi.bios.version: A02 dmi.board.vendor: Alienware dmi.board.version: A02 dmi.chassis.type: 8 dmi.chassis.vendor: Alienware dmi.chassis.version: A02 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAlienware:bvrA02:bd11/16/2009:svnAlienware:pnM15x:pvrA02:rvnAlienware:rn:rvrA02:cvnAlienware:ct8:cvrA02: dmi.product.name: M15x dmi.product.version: A02 dmi.sys.vendor: Alienware fglrx: Not loaded system: distro: Ubuntu architecture: x86_64kernel: 2.6.31-18-generic ** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug -- NVIDIA - Xorg crashes (empty backtrace) with segfault OR general protection in ld-2.10.1.so https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507233 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 507233] Re: NVIDIA - Xorg crashes (empty backtrace) with segfault OR general protection in ld-2.10.1.so
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37864129/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37864130/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37864131/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37864132/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37864133/Lsusb.txt ** Attachment added: PciDisplay.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37864134/PciDisplay.txt ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37864135/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37864136/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37864137/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37864138/UdevDb.txt ** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37864139/UdevLog.txt ** Attachment added: XorgConf.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37864140/XorgConf.txt ** Attachment added: XorgLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37864141/XorgLog.txt ** Attachment added: XorgLogOld.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37864142/XorgLogOld.txt ** Attachment added: Xrandr.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37864143/Xrandr.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37864144/XsessionErrors.txt ** Attachment added: glxinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37864145/glxinfo.txt ** Attachment added: setxkbmap.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37864146/setxkbmap.txt ** Attachment added: xdpyinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37864147/xdpyinfo.txt ** Attachment added: xkbcomp.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37864148/xkbcomp.txt -- NVIDIA - Xorg crashes (empty backtrace) with segfault OR general protection in ld-2.10.1.so https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507233 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 507233] Re: NVIDIA - Xorg crashes (empty backtrace) with segfault OR general protection in ld-2.10.1.so
It crashed in between me submitting the bug and uploading this. ** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log.old http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37864190/Xorg.0.log.old -- NVIDIA - Xorg crashes (empty backtrace) with segfault OR general protection in ld-2.10.1.so https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507233 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 507233] Re: NVIDIA - Xorg crashes (empty backtrace) with segfault OR general protection in ld-2.10.1.so
Oh, sorry, should include this. Xorg crashes then immediately brings me to the login screen. -- NVIDIA - Xorg crashes (empty backtrace) with segfault OR general protection in ld-2.10.1.so https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507233 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 438536] Re: Notifications should show up closer to top right
I don't know about anyone else, but I've resorted to just using notification-daemon again. I can't stand notify-osd. Even though using notification-daemon solves my problem, there is no reason why I should have to use it anyway. I liked the look of the new notifications. But I use Pidgin a lot, and notify-osd only shows one notification from a program at a time. If I could dismiss notifications, it wouldn't be a problem. However, I can't. The developers want the notifications to be passive and ephemeral, but they have to realize that some notifications are not meant to be passive. We are also being repeatedly told that notifications are going to support varied times, but it's been a year since notify-osd was first introduced, and this feature still hasn't been implemented. Does anyone have an answer for that? -- Notifications should show up closer to top right https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438536 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 449685] Re: After waking up from sleep, EEE 900 goes immediately back to sleep, once
Same exact probleem. Dell XPS M140. -- After waking up from sleep, EEE 900 goes immediately back to sleep, once https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449685 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 434789] Re: Notifications appear too low
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 438536 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438536 I'm in the same boat as Dinero Francis. I've been using Ubuntu for about 4 years now, and I didn't pick up on the difference between sync and async notifications. From the standpoint of a new user, this would be even MORE confusing, because they wouldn't know where to look for an explanation. I don't feel that this design was very well justified. -- Notifications appear too low https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434789 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 433928] Re: gdm-binary[2671]: WARNING: Unable to find users: no seat-id found
I can confirm that I have the same bug. Dbus is running. I have tried reconfiguring consolekit, policykit, xorg, and gdm. They have done nothing. Booting with rw also did nothing. My computer is fully up to date. I don't, however, have the /proc/1043/environ warning that dino99 had. I don't think this was mentioned, but instead of starting gdm, a black screen appears. I can't switch VT's from this, so the only way to get a shell is in recovery mode. Another thing to note is that starting X directly from a shell in recovery mode results in the same black screen. This is the same whether from the root shell or the normal shell accessed by choosing resume from the recovery menu. Any suggestions? -- gdm-binary[2671]: WARNING: Unable to find users: no seat-id found https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433928 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 433928] Re: gdm-binary[2671]: WARNING: Unable to find users: no seat-id found
On further note (and checking of daemon.log), I realized that I DID have the same problem as dino99, but only BEFORE I was unable to start GDM. -- gdm-binary[2671]: WARNING: Unable to find users: no seat-id found https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433928 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 433928] Re: gdm-binary[2671]: WARNING: Unable to find users: no seat-id found
I've been updating throughout the evening, and apparently one of the recent updates to something fixed the problem for me. -- gdm-binary[2671]: WARNING: Unable to find users: no seat-id found https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433928 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355981] Re: Brightness notification does not show correct brightness level
Running rmmod dell-laptop and then modprobe -i dell-laptop fixed it. The module was shown as running in lsmod before this, so I still don't know exactly what was wrong. Either way, its fixed now. -- Brightness notification does not show correct brightness level https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355981 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 340788] Re: package scim 1.4.7-3ubuntu12 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2
I think I may have had an incomplete install that was trying to configure itself. Force-reinstalling the package solved the problem. ** Changed in: scim (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- package scim 1.4.7-3ubuntu12 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340788 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355981] Re: Brightness notification does not show correct brightness level
I recently installed a custom kernel, and on that custom kernel, the brightness level showed up correctly. I had been trying build a kernel that took advantage of kernel mode setting for my Intel i915 card. I also compiled some other options into the kernel, and I think one of them might have done it. I suspect dell-laptop, but I'm not entirely sure. In my custom kernel it was used as a module, but I don't think it is included as such in the Ubuntu kernel. I'm going to go look up how to compile the module outside of the kernel, but I can't help but feel that the module should at least be included with the kernel. I know it was previously, because my brightness used to work correctly. -- Brightness notification does not show correct brightness level https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355981 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 328232] Re: [Jaunty][UXA]compiz.real memory leak
Vitali, that fix causes some problems with transparency. The fix for a certain UXA transparency bug was to turn off indirect-rendering. -- [Jaunty][UXA]compiz.real memory leak https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328232 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 324854] Re: DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz [patch]
Yep, that solved my problem. For a fix, one could turn off the --indirect-rendering option in fusion-icon. Although I'm still curious as to why that causes a problem. Anyone have any thoughts? -- DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz [patch] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324854 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 324854] Re: DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz [patch]
No, I haven't built mesa from source before. I ran ls -R /usr/local/ | grep -i mesa just to be sure, and got no output. Do you know of anything else that might cause the problem? -- DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz [patch] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324854 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 324854] Re: DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz [patch]
Output is attached. ** Attachment added: Output of dpkg -l | grep mesa http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25979004/dpkg.txt -- DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz [patch] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324854 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 324854] Re: DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz [patch]
This bug still affects me. i915 chipset, up-to-date Jaunty with UXA enabled. gksudo also does not shade the rest of the screen. -- DRI2: (UXA) white transparency artifacts with compiz [patch] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324854 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 55780] Re: Dell Inspiron WiFi light does not show on/off status
Actually, I noticed something else about mine. It starts off, but turns on if I hit the function key. At that point wifi radio is off, but the light is on. Then whenever I hit the function key it flashes off for a moment and turns back on. This same flashing behavior occurs when changing my MAC address through ifconfig. On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Jonathan Jesse jje...@gmail.com wrote: On my Dell Latitude E6500 the WiFi LED does go off when I turn it off through the function keys. Running up to date Jaunty. -- Dell Inspiron WiFi light does not show on/off status https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/55780 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in “linux” source package in Ubuntu: Triaged Status in “linux-source-2.6.20” source package in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Status in “linux-source-2.6.22” source package in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Bug description: A light on the Dell Inspiron 6000 laptop under Windows will turn on when the WiFi card is on, and off when it's off. It is turned on/off by pressing two keys on the keyboard. These keys still work but the light is never on. For this reason it is possible to turn the wireless card on and off while trying to make it work by pressing these keys, without ever realising you are doing this or why it works sometimes and others not. The light should be made to work if possible. -- Dell Inspiron WiFi light does not show on/off status https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/55780 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55780] Re: Dell Inspiron WiFi light does not show on/off status
Jaunty Beta. Wifi LED also stays on at all times. Before Beta LED was always off. Function keys work as normal. This was on a Dell XPS M140 -- Dell Inspiron WiFi light does not show on/off status https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/55780 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55780] Re: Dell Inspiron WiFi light does not show on/off status
Jaunty Beta. Wifi LED also stays on at all times. Before Beta LED was always off. Function keys work as normal. This was on a Dell XPS M140 -- Dell Inspiron WiFi light does not show on/off status https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/55780 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355981] Re: Brightness notification does not show correct brightness level
Yes, I can confirm that this problem does occur with notification- daemon. Thank you. Should I open a bug for gnome-settings-daemon, or can this one be moved /cross-linked to it? -- Brightness notification does not show correct brightness level https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355981 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355981] Re: Brightness notification does not show correct brightness level
Also, the meter *definitely* goes down less the smaller it gets. Not sure if that will help, though. -- Brightness notification does not show correct brightness level https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355981 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 329236] Re: [Jaunty] Alsa PulseAudio integration crashes Firefox flashplayer
Yup, upgrading to 10 did it. Thanks! -- [Jaunty] Alsa PulseAudio integration crashes Firefox flashplayer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329236 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 355981] [NEW] Brightness notification does not show correct brightness level
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: notify-osd Running on Ubuntu Jaunty (9.04) on Dell XPS M140 with a 915 chipset. notify-osd version: 0.9.9-0ubuntu1 When adjusting screen brightness using keyboard shortcuts, I only need to hit the button around 6-7 times before I am at minimum/maximum brightness. The notification only shows me having gone down a tiny fraction of this amount. Further pressings of the button lower the meter, but have no effect on my brightness. It takes more than fifty presses to get the meter down to about 25% (decided I wasn't going to test any further). As the meter got smaller and smaller, it seemed that the amount by which it was decreasing was also shrinking, although I may have just been getting bored. I have had this problem for about 2-3 months now, and it used to work perfectly. ** Affects: notify-osd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Brightness notification does not show correct brightness level https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355981 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 340788] [NEW] package scim 1.4.7-3ubuntu12 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: scim Attempted to upgrade packages on Jaunty build with kernel 2.6.28-9. ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2 Package: scim 1.4.7-3ubuntu12 SourcePackage: scim Title: package scim 1.4.7-3ubuntu12 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2 Uname: Linux 2.6.28-9-generic i686 ** Affects: scim (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 -- package scim 1.4.7-3ubuntu12 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340788 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 340788] Re: package scim 1.4.7-3ubuntu12 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23737079/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23737080/DpkgTerminalLog.gz -- package scim 1.4.7-3ubuntu12 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340788 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 329236] [NEW] [Jaunty] Alsa PulseAudio integration crashes Firefox flashplayer
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libasound2-plugins Description:Ubuntu jaunty (development branch) Release:9.04 Kernel: 2.6.28-7-generic libasound2-plugins version: 1.0.18-1ubuntu3 pulsaudio version: 0.9.14-0ubuntu4: 10.0.15.3ubuntu3 firefox version: 3.0.6+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 Firefox crashes on all attempts to use Flash Player, including YouTube and most Flash Games (www.kongregate.com). The page is generally displayed for about 5 seconds on average, occasionally with a little of the audio beginning. The audio in this case is very choppy, with a lot of background noise. The audio will not play for more than half a second before Firefox crashes. Firefox crashes with terminal output: ALSA lib pcm_pulse.c:626:(pulse_prepare) PulseAudio: Unable to create stream: Invalid argument (repeated about 10 times) E: shm.c: mmap() failed: Cannot allocate memory (repeated about 30 times) firefox: pulse.c:200: pulse_new: Assertion `p-context' failed. Aborted (core dumped) All the text appears in the half-second when the audio occasionally plays. It appears even when the audio does not start. ** Affects: alsa-plugins (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [Jaunty] Alsa PulseAudio integration crashes Firefox flashplayer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329236 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
