[Bug 1973598] Re: mtd-self-test failure on arm64 (mtdram module)
Thanks Lukas! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973598 Title: mtd-self-test failure on arm64 (mtdram module) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1973598/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1973598] Re: mtd-self-test failure on arm64 (mtdram module)
I suspect the self tests need to check the name is "mtdram test device" before running. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973598 Title: mtd-self-test failure on arm64 (mtdram module) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1973598/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1960768] Re: fwupd crash on stop
I think Ubuntu probably needs gusb 0.3.9 or newer to fix this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960768 Title: fwupd crash on stop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1960768/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1870051] Re: fwupd ftbfs in focal
> Fail: 1 What's the failure? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870051 Title: fwupd ftbfs in focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1870051/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1806323] Re: libfu_plugin_dell.so w/dell TB16 Dock blanks the display
@superm1 ~superm1 ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1806323 Title: libfu_plugin_dell.so w/dell TB16 Dock blanks the display To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1806323/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1791407] Re: Thinkpad L570 UEFI destroyed after BIOS update
> Lenovo are currently investigating what went wrong I've just heard back from them. The bricking should only only occur on these selected models when you upgrade from a very old firmware version to a very new firmware version. This is because the old (as in the version you're upgrading from) firmware had a bug that meant the screen was not initialized correctly and the update progress bar was not being shown. The beeps actually mean "flashing, don't turn off" rather than "system error". > After about one minute I manually switched off the system via a 5 second press on the power button This is when the firmware was actually being flashed -- but of course you didn't know that :( Lenovo are preparing a new update that checks the previous firmware version before being scheduled. This should be on the LVFS in the next few hours. They also shared some guidance about how to recover a bricked machines: * Remove all power supplies, which includes the AC adapter, the main battery, *and* the coin battery. * Press and hold the power button for 30s. * Attach all of power supplies and press the power button to power on the computer. Depending on when the firmware update was interrupted this may or may not recover the laptop. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1791407 Title: Thinkpad L570 UEFI destroyed after BIOS update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fwupd/+bug/1791407/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1791407] Re: Thinkpad L570 UEFI destroyed after BIOS update
> Lenovo are the ones that upload, test and certify firmware releases. Lenovo are currently investigating what went wrong, I'll update this bug when I have more information myself. I'll ask them for some kind of recovery guide, fingers crossed we can just use something like a USB drive with the firmware on, for instance like https://forums.lenovo.com/t5/Lenovo-U-and-S-Series-Notebooks/LENOVO- BIOS-RECOVERY/td-p/332989 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1791407 Title: Thinkpad L570 UEFI destroyed after BIOS update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fwupd/+bug/1791407/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1791407] Re: Thinkpad L570 UEFI destroyed after BIOS update
> I've bricked two laptops (a L560 and a L570) due to this update. Ohh dear, this really shouldn't have happened. I'm sorry for this experience you've had. > or the fact that lenovo released a fault firmware Lenovo are the ones that upload, test and certify firmware releases. The LVFS doesn't test anything and all the onus is on the OEM to test on actual hardware before moving to stable. > to NOT update the bios unless your system isn't working as expected 1.35 also fixes an unspecified security issue, so I assume that's why it was uploaded. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1791407 Title: Thinkpad L570 UEFI destroyed after BIOS update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fwupd/+bug/1791407/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1791407] Re: Thinkpad L570 UEFI destroyed after BIOS update
I've disabled this firmware on the LVFS and have asked Lenovo what happened. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1791407 Title: Thinkpad L570 UEFI destroyed after BIOS update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fwupd/+bug/1791407/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 276105]
We moved the upstream bugtracker to GitHub a long time ago. If this issue still affects you please re-create the issue here: https://github.com/hughsie/PackageKit/issues Sorry for the impersonal message, and fingers crossed your issue no longer happens. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/276105 Title: easily clean the system of orphaned dependencies To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/packagekit/+bug/276105/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 276106]
We moved the upstream bugtracker to GitHub a long time ago. If this issue still affects you please re-create the issue here: https://github.com/hughsie/PackageKit/issues Sorry for the impersonal message, and fingers crossed your issue no longer happens. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/276106 Title: include a way to check new packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/packagekit/+bug/276106/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1631002] Re: fwupd crashed with SIGSEGV in malloc_consolidate()
Isn't this a libusb bug? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1631002 Title: fwupd crashed with SIGSEGV in malloc_consolidate() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1631002/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1698675] Re: fwupd crashed with SIGSEGV in g_str_hash()
Does running valgrind as root on the fwupd process trigger any invalid reads or other warnings? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1698675 Title: fwupd crashed with SIGSEGV in g_str_hash() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1698675/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1762617] Re: gnome-software crashed with SIGSEGV in fwupd_device_from_key_value → fwupd_device_set_from_variant_iter → fwupd_device_from_variant → fwupd_client_signal_cb
I've just fixed this upstream (i.e. don't crash the client if the server sends the wrong thing) -- but I'd really like to know why the daemon is sending the wrong thing in the first place. Are there any critical warnings from the fwupd process in the journal perhaps? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1762617 Title: gnome-software crashed with SIGSEGV in fwupd_device_from_key_value → fwupd_device_set_from_variant_iter → fwupd_device_from_variant → fwupd_client_signal_cb To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1762617/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1756695] Re: gnome-software crashed with signal 5 in g_dbus_proxy_call_sync → fwupd_client_get_upgrades → gs_plugin_fwupd_add_updates → gs_plugin_loader_call_vfunc
Even a client stacktrace with debuginfo symbols would be useful... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1756695 Title: gnome-software crashed with signal 5 in g_dbus_proxy_call_sync → fwupd_client_get_upgrades → gs_plugin_fwupd_add_updates → gs_plugin_loader_call_vfunc To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1756695/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1737723] Re: failed to extract .cab file: incorrect checksum detected
I've pushed the upstream fix as https://git.gnome.org/browse/gcab/commit/?id=cbfff7a2175c7f970761c800411c46eed41129b4 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1737723 Title: failed to extract .cab file: incorrect checksum detected To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1737723/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1737723] Re: failed to extract .cab file: incorrect checksum detected
What architecture is this? If it's big endian you need my fixes from git: https://git.gnome.org//browse/gcab -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1737723 Title: failed to extract .cab file: incorrect checksum detected To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcab/+bug/1737723/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1717667] Re: fwupd crashed with SIGSEGV in FU_IS_DEVICE()
Looks like https://github.com/hughsie/fwupd/commit/0dec274e56c23c4afdda75bb42d5b6c9928cb1b6 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1717667 Title: fwupd crashed with SIGSEGV in FU_IS_DEVICE() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1717667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1717009] Re: fwupd breaking access to certain usb devices
Can you file an upstream report please. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1717009 Title: fwupd breaking access to certain usb devices To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1717009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1536871] Re: [MIR] fwupd
> I'd very much like to see the firmware.xml.gz file using sha-256 I added support for more than just SHA1 to fwupd last week. After some more testing, I'll enable it on the metadata file from the LVFS. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1536871 Title: [MIR] fwupd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1536871/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1673744] Re: Fwupdmgr does not work on Ubuntu 16.04.2
Yes, old versions of fwupd verified the contents of the .inf file, and new ones do not. This was done to avoid subtle incompatibilities with files submitted into Windows Update. If you want it to work with 16.04, I think you can safely omit the .inf file in the cab file. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673744 Title: Fwupdmgr does not work on Ubuntu 16.04.2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1673744/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1665606] Re: fwupd crashed with SIGSEGV in _int_malloc()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1663548 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1663548 If you comment out the NoNewPrivileges=yes in /usr/lib/systemd/system/fwupd.service -- does this now start normally? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1665606 Title: fwupd crashed with SIGSEGV in _int_malloc() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1665606/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1663548] Re: fwupd crashed with SIGSEGV in _int_malloc()
If you comment out the NoNewPrivileges=yes in /usr/lib/systemd/system/fwupd.service -- does this now start normally? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1663548 Title: fwupd crashed with SIGSEGV in _int_malloc() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1663548/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1665606] Re: fwupd crashed with SIGSEGV in _int_malloc()
I can't see anything obvious why it would crash there. Is it repeatable? Is you run fwupd on the command line as root with --verbose, can you upload the log please. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1665606 Title: fwupd crashed with SIGSEGV in _int_malloc() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1665606/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1650783] Re: Zesty: gnome-software crashes on start if gnome-software-plugin-flatpak is installed
Can you show me the patches that you're applying on top of the tarball? It looks like something is using GsFlatpak from outside the flatpak plugin. Could you also please grab the entire --verbose log please with no other gnome-software's running. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1650783 Title: Zesty: gnome-software crashes on start if gnome-software-plugin- flatpak is installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-gnome/+bug/1650783/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1627964] Re: fwupd assert failure: *** Error in `/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/fwupd/fwupd': free(): invalid pointer: 0x000055f0c0f9f141 ***
Can the reporter please upload /var/lib/app-info/yaml/si.archive.ubuntu .com_ubuntu_dists_yakkety_universe_dep11_Components-amd64.yml.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1627964 Title: fwupd assert failure: *** Error in `/usr/lib/x86_64-linux- gnu/fwupd/fwupd': free(): invalid pointer: 0x55f0c0f9f141 *** To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream-glib/+bug/1627964/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1551191] Re: gnome-software crashed with SIGSEGV in GS_IS_PLUGIN_LOADER()
Can anybody reproduce this when "gnome-software --verbose" is running; e.g. so we have debug logs? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551191 Title: gnome-software crashed with SIGSEGV in GS_IS_PLUGIN_LOADER() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-software/+bug/1551191/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1615964] Re: Mouse pointer is invisible after suspend
Why do you think this is a bug in fwupd? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615964 Title: Mouse pointer is invisible after suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1615964/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1591868] Re: fwupd consuming 100% CPU
Agreed; reproduced -- grab this on top of the last patch: commit 481055cd02c5244bede06ca4a06ab55602d01505 Author: Richard Hughes <rich...@hughsie.com> Date: Sun Aug 21 08:59:45 2016 +0100 trivial: Use the correct autoptr cleanup on yaml error :100644 100644 f65f75b... 48e51f0... M libappstream-glib/as-yaml.c -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1591868 Title: fwupd consuming 100% CPU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream-glib/+bug/1591868/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1591868] Re: fwupd consuming 100% CPU
Mario, can you upload /home/test/yaml.yml somewhere please. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1591868 Title: fwupd consuming 100% CPU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream-glib/+bug/1591868/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1591868] Re: fwupd consuming 100% CPU
I've further extended Anders patch to return a helpful GError: https://github.com/hughsie/appstream- glib/commit/64029dfe02b85afe611a279380a84fca51208d4c I've rolled up these three patches into one and backported to the stable branch in: https://github.com/hughsie/appstream- glib/commit/60033e61394562d706e703ad33e0d7e6583d83ce I guess pulling that last commit into 16.04 makes sense, if nothing else so it pinpoints where exactly and why the file is corrupt. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1591868 Title: fwupd consuming 100% CPU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream-glib/+bug/1591868/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1591868] Re: fwupd consuming 100% CPU
There's a workaround here: https://github.com/hughsie/appstream- glib/commit/2ec31bac7bd77e7b39c502276f4acec21ed9d576 Although, whatever wrote that invalid YAML file needs to be fixed, or gnome-software is going to show very few applications... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1591868 Title: fwupd consuming 100% CPU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream-glib/+bug/1591868/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1614105] Re: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/fwupd/fwupd:11:as_store_load_yaml_file:as_store_from_file_internal:as_store_load_app_info_file:as_store_load_app_info:as_store_search_app_info
Can someone upload a copy of /var/lib/app-info/yaml/de.archive.ubuntu .com_ubuntu_dists_xenial-backports_main_dep11_Components-amd64.yml.gz that makes "appstream-util search foo" crash please. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1614105 Title: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux- gnu/fwupd/fwupd:11:as_store_load_yaml_file:as_store_from_file_internal:as_store_load_app_info_file:as_store_load_app_info:as_store_search_app_info To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream-glib/+bug/1614105/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1591868] Re: fwupd consuming 100% CPU
Can you upload a tarball of whatever is in /var/cache/app-info/yamls pls. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1591868 Title: fwupd consuming 100% CPU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream-glib/+bug/1591868/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1591868] Re: fwupd consuming 100% CPU
Also, could you try getting the output of "appstream-util search notgoingtoexist --verbose" please. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1591868 Title: fwupd consuming 100% CPU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1591868/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1602485] Re: fwupd gnome-software eat cpu
What does 'fwupdmgr get-devices' say? Any output from "fwupdmgr monitor" Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1602485 Title: fwupd gnome-software eat cpu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1602485/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1589585] Re: Ubuntu Software tab Installed refreshing endlessly every 2 seconds
I'd be interested to hear if the no-open-device fix for fwupd would also help here, although this does look like the device reconnecting wildly (hardware issue?) like Mario said. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1589585 Title: Ubuntu Software tab Installed refreshing endlessly every 2 seconds To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1589585/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1589585] Re: Ubuntu Software tab Installed refreshing endlessly every 2 seconds
Can someone decompress that and put the important bits on a pastebin pls? I'm on holiday and only have my phone and slow internet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1589585 Title: Ubuntu Software tab Installed refreshing endlessly every 2 seconds To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1589585/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1591868] Re: fwupd consuming 100% CPU
Interesting bug. This looks to be spinning in libyaml, but without debug symbols it's a little hard to piece together. Could you please install the relevant debug symbols (at least libappstream-glib, fwupd and libyaml) and get a new backtrace please. If you can reproduce using "fwupd --verbose" that might throw some light on what's going on. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1591868 Title: fwupd consuming 100% CPU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1591868/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1574079] Re: USB audio device is not recognized after startup in 16.04
I've pushed a patch to master that seems to fix the issue for me of the 2i2: https://github.com/hughsie/fwupd/commit/d0583ae3403b904658b4ac3c10330287ccbae6c9 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574079 Title: USB audio device is not recognized after startup in 16.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1574079/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1574079] Re: USB audio device is not recognized after startup in 16.04
Seb Brosig sent me a 2i2 device for testing, I can reproduce the bug and now have a USB analyser connected to the device. It'll take a little while to work out, but I'm getting there. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574079 Title: USB audio device is not recognized after startup in 16.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1574079/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1589585] Re: Ubuntu Software tab Installed refreshing endlessly every 2 seconds
Also, a "fwupd --verbose" log would be really useful when the CPU is spinning, thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1589585 Title: Ubuntu Software tab Installed refreshing endlessly every 2 seconds To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1589585/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1574079] Re: USB audio device is not recognized after startup in 16.04
There's a test branch which I believe fix this problem in https://github.com/hughsie/fwupd/issues/50#issuecomment-223222483 if anyone can test this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574079 Title: USB audio device is not recognized after startup in 16.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1574079/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1574079] Re: USB audio device is not recognized after startup in 16.04
So, nothing unexpected in those gdb traces... Perhaps it's peculiar that there are three monitoring threads for libusb, but that's due to a limitation in the fwupd provider structure which shouldn't be a huge problem. To rule out that being the issue, can anyone reproduce the issue after killing fwupd as root, running "sudo dfu-tool watch" and then inserting the hardware. If it's a DFU endpoint issue then that should reproduce the bug, if it's a more general USB issue then the bug should be there also. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574079 Title: USB audio device is not recognized after startup in 16.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1574079/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1574079] Re: USB audio device is not recognized after startup in 16.04
> even if it doesn't happen by default in Kubuntu GNOME autostarts gnome-software, which allows you to update applications *and* firmware on devices. The latter contacts fwupd for the list of updates which then itself autostarts the fwupd binary. If you call `fwupdmgr get-devices` manually on kubuntu, then insert the device you'll likely see the same symptoms. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574079 Title: USB audio device is not recognized after startup in 16.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1574079/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1574079] Re: USB audio device is not recognized after startup in 16.04
Okay, so quite a few different issues here. * If the audio card doesn't work when fwupd is removed and there is no fwupd process running then it's not a fwupd issue. * Does everybody who has to replug also have an entry for the soundcard in `dfu-tool list`? If so, please paste the output. * If you have a fwupd at 100% CPU saturating one core can you please attach gdb to the process (as root), break and get a backtrace please. * If you get a critical warning from fwuod when running, can you run fwupd as root with `sudo G_DEBUG=fatal-warnings gdb fwupd --verbose` and then grab a backtrace when it breaks. * The only thing that seems to be common is that all these USB sound cards are expensive :) If all of these things sounds complicated, is there a cheaper version of the devices that reproduces the problem, or is anyone willing to send me an unused device for a week or so for debugging? I run regression tests on a lot of devices before each release and so if there's a cheap device available it would be a good thing to add. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574079 Title: USB audio device is not recognized after startup in 16.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1574079/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1575248] Re: "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." on "sudo apt-get update"
If it helps, I can roll a new fwupd tomorrow. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575248 Title: "AppStream cache update completed, but some metadata was ignored due to errors." on "sudo apt-get update" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/appstream/+bug/1575248/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1536871] Re: [MIR] fwupd
I can do a new tarball release with all the suggested fixes if that would make things easier. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1536871 Title: [MIR] fwupd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1536871/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1536871] Re: [MIR] fwupd
With the gpg issue, log in as root and do: killall fwupd gpg2 --list-sigs if you see the LVFS key, "gpg2 --delete-keys 4538BAC2" -- then remove or change /etc/pki/fwupd-metadata/GPG-KEY-Linux-Vendor-Firmware-Service then restart fwupd and try a "fwupdmgr refresh" -- this should report: failed to update metadata: Could not check signature '48A6D80E4538BAC2' as no public key I can't get your reproducer to work on Fedora, as I'm using gpg2 throughout rather than gpg. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1536871 Title: [MIR] fwupd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1536871/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1536871] Re: [MIR] fwupd
Hey, - gpgme_release() is called in finalize() unless you can see where we're not deallocating an object on error - as_store_from_xml() operates on a UTF-8 string, so any embedded NULs would be invalid anyway - /etc/pki/ is a cross-distro spec, no? - /var/cache/app-info/xmls is specified in the AppStream specification - I've switched away from using /tmp in https://github.com/hughsie/fwupd/commit/b8956d41ee00c03d83f42adcf787463443218d09 - dfu encryption is where a vendor doesn't want to ship raw firmware that can be RE'd, and where the device has existing XTEA secret tokens - XTEA is used as USB devices do not have the CPU or SRAM capability for public/private key algorithms -- see my youtube talk for more information on this - Using single-pass MD5 as a KDF allows us to match the output from other proprietary flashing tools. I'd be open to adding a mode to use another KDF if this is an issue, although with XTEA you only get 128 bits of "private key" which I'm not sure is the right word at all as XTEA is just a simple block cipher. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1536871 Title: [MIR] fwupd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1536871/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1536871] Re: [MIR] fwupd
Yes, also further to Mario's comment (you do need to restart the daemon) you also need to clear the persistent gpg2 keyring. I perhaps wasn't clear we also using the persistent keyring store -- using commit https://github.com/hughsie/fwupd/commit/e4141f4f234d258424020069dadf8df39848a119 I see (using the defaults): 11:14:53importing key 3FC6B804410ED0840D8F2F9748A6D80E4538BAC2 [0] Success 11:14:53Using signature fingerprint 3FC6B804410ED0840D8F2F9748A6D80E4538BAC2 And then, if I replace the LVFS key in fwupd-metadata with another (e.g. RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-nonfree-fedora-25) and restart the daemon: 11:21:24Adding public key /etc/pki/fwupd-metadata/RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-nonfree-fedora-25 11:21:24importing key DD7525B6184B0512AA8CB1002E59159B96CA6280 [0] Success 11:21:24Using signature fingerprint 3FC6B804410ED0840D8F2F9748A6D80E4538BAC2 So it is somewhat confusing that we're still using the "removed" LVFS key for verification success. I suppose it's a bug we're using the default persistent store (of root), which I supposed could be fixed using gpgme_ctx_set_engine_info() and setting the homedir to something like /usr/lib/fwupd -- although this might not be expected if you want to just import a key as a root user and then expect it just to work with fwupd. So, certainly not a CVE, but somewhat non-obvious. I'd be open to changing the keyring to be fwupd-specific (and adding docs) if this would make things more obvious, although I'd have to check with the Red Hat security team again before doing so. As for changing /tmp/firmware.xml.gz.asc I'm not exactly sure what you mean; there is of course no inotify watch there. We download the files and then open them, sending the file descriptors to the daemon rather than as a filename or data blob. The download check is being done on the large firmware files themselves, using the data from the metadata, so I'm a little confused what you're trying to do. If you want to test corrupting the metadata or signing files the best way to do this would be to edit fu-util.c and modify the data before it gets squirted to the daemon as a pair of file descriptors. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1536871 Title: [MIR] fwupd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1536871/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1536871] Re: [MIR] fwupd
Hi Seth, Verification of the firmware LVFS metadata: https://github.com/hughsie/fwupd/blob/master/src/fu-main.c#L947 which then uses https://github.com/hughsie/fwupd/blob/master/src/fu- keyring.c#L340 Verification of the cab file: https://github.com/hughsie/fwupd/blob/master/src/fu-main.c#L495 after the PolicyKit auth, then uses https://github.com/hughsie/fwupd/blob/master/src/fu-main.c#L323 to work out the trust status. We don't check the firmware.inf as we don't use that in fwupd, only in the LVFS for the version for display. The digest is "digest algo 8" which is SHA-256 already. Richard -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1536871 Title: [MIR] fwupd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1536871/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1544376] Re: [ffe] Enable firmware support
Hey Mario, After the 3.20.0 tarball and the lifting of the hard code freeze I'm intending to backport a few more patches indeed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1544376 Title: [ffe] Enable firmware support To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream-glib/+bug/1544376/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1536871] Re: [MIR] fwupd
Hi Seth, I'm the upstream of both fwupd and the LVFS. I wanted to point out a few things: * We use a GPG detached signature of the firmware file itself to avoid being able to just C the signature between cab files * I've reviewed (and fixed critical warning bugs) in libgcab, and have also fuzz tested it (afl) over several days so I'm fairly sure there isn't any exploit here. You want libgcab >= 0.7 for these fixes. * The metadata also has to be signed by the LVFS GPG key (or another key in your keyring) before it will be parsed by fwupd. * We require a higher PolicyKit authentication level for installing older versions of firmware than you have currently installed, and in UEFI vendors can set the `version_lowest` key if they also want to forbid this if for instance a on-flash index has been upgraded. * The checksum is more of a test of a correct download and isn't actually used for the trust calculation. It could be entirely omitted and remain secure, although it does provide a better UX in that we can say "the firmware download was corrupted" rather than "the firmware signature wasn't correct". Also, the download of files from the LVFS comes over SSL (to avoid MITM), although we don't actually require that before parsing things in the daemon as we just pass down from the client to the server a blob. Even if you were MITMd the files would have to be resigned with a GPG key in your keyring, and if an attacker has that there are easier ways to attack your system :) I can look at moving from SHA1 to SHA256, but I don't really think this is a reason to block the package for the reasons I gave above. I'm happy to answer any questions you've got, and am also happy to have a call (GMTish timezone) if you'd like me to give you a high level overview of the system, or for a deep-dive into the code. RIchard -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1536871 Title: [MIR] fwupd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1536871/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1536871] Re: [MIR] fwupd
Also, if anyone wants a quick (well, 45 minute) overview of the whole thing my DevConf presentation was recorded: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s2NhxEvwE0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1536871 Title: [MIR] fwupd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1536871/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 966704] Re: Settings schema org.gnome.settings-daemon.plugins.updates is missing
Sebastien, that's not really the way you disable things in g-s-d. Schema can't be shipped by other programs into the g-s-d namespace. If you want to disable shipping the auto-updates plugin that's fine, but the schema has to be installed otherwise other programs that rely on it are going to start crashing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/966704 Title: Settings schema org.gnome.settings-daemon.plugins.updates is missing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/966704/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 531190]
The importance flag is for the developer to assign priorities, not the reporter. Could you please try with upstream versions of upower and gnome-power-manager please, as Ubuntu include lots of patches that are not upstream. You probably want to check to see if there are any BIOS upgrades available. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/531190 Title: upower (devkit-power) reporting bad data when AC cable is unplugged To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/devicekit-power/+bug/531190/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 531190]
I'm pretty sure we work around the kernel bug in new releases -- the problem was tat the kernel sometimes changed the reporting data units between suspend and resume. If this doesn't work with a new kernel and upower, than please reopen. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/531190 Title: upower (devkit-power) reporting bad data when AC cable is unplugged To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/devicekit-power/+bug/531190/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 120258] Re: Laptop Battery Time Remaining Outrageously Inaccurate
I'm pretty sure some of you will be fixed by this upstream commit: commit b971b43c45bef9251e1d6389716b9fbe107802c7 Author: Leonardo Robol l...@robol.it Date: Wed Oct 19 17:13:12 2011 +0100 Use linear regression to get better predicted battery times For hardware that has no rate data we use the differences in charge over a time period to work out the effective rate. Using linear regression this estimation is much more realistic. To do this, introduce a simple circular buffer and use an index to calculate the rate on each update. Signed-off-by: Richard Hughes rich...@hughsie.com -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120258 Title: Laptop Battery Time Remaining Outrageously Inaccurate To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-power/+bug/120258/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 845049] Re: colormgr find-device doesn't work
Fixed upstream: commit bfb35b0de7cdbff13ea9aab1c6175a7b2f194063 Author: Richard Hughes rich...@hughsie.com Date: Mon Oct 3 10:00:03 2011 +0100 colormgr only needs one argument for find-device Resolves https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/colord/+bug/845049 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/845049 Title: colormgr find-device doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/colord/+bug/845049/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 843762] Re: 11.10 b1 not loading when USB mouse plugged in USB 3.0 port
Why do you think this is a colord bug? Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/843762 Title: 11.10 b1 not loading when USB mouse plugged in USB 3.0 port To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/colord/+bug/843762/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 841821] Re: Color manager shows [invalid UTF-8]
Florin, can you upload the file created by sudo get-edid edid.bin please. I need the actual EDID blob, not the parsed version. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/841821 Title: Color manager shows [invalid UTF-8] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-control-center/+bug/841821/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 833601] Re: Fails to calibrate printer, complains that it doesn't exist
You're nor supposed to run gcm-calibrate by hand, you're supposed to have it launched for you by the gnome-control-center color panel. I'll remove the misleading 'xrandr-Lenovo Group Limited message as that was only for testing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/833601 Title: Fails to calibrate printer, complains that it doesn't exist To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-color-manager/+bug/833601/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 823185] Re: [MIR] colord
Imo it would be better to disabled the colord support in these two packages for now, so that these can be built and tested. Just not possible. The g-s-d and g-c-c maintainers are not willing to make the colord support conditional, although I suppose you could manually hack out the building from configure.ac and a couple of Makefile.am's. Kees, what about applying the two patches suggested by Richard? I can just release a new tarball upstream when Kees is happy with the changes. Does the --enable-fd-fallback patch mean that files are not opened by colord (i.e. they must be opened by the user first)? Well, they are still opened by colord (the fd) but the session will have to have parsed the file before the fd is passed. You can never prevent DoSing the daemon, as there's no effective rate or capacity limiting of the messages by the DBus daemon. I'll work on a user-group patch, although it'll need to be fixed/audited by someone who knows what they are doing, .i.e. not me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823185 Title: [MIR] colord To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/colord/+bug/823185/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 823185] Re: [MIR] colord
I'll work on a user-group patch I think we want something like this: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/0001-Allow-the-daemon-to- run-with-a-different-user-and-gr.patch I can't get this to work (the daemon disconnects for me as soon as I change group) and I've run out of time for today, and so I would appreciate someone picking this patch up and fixing/reviewing it for me. In Fedora and RHEL daemons like this run as root. Thanks. Richard. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823185 Title: [MIR] colord To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/colord/+bug/823185/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 826754] Re: colord assert failure: colord: browser.c:701: avahi_service_browser_free: Assertion `*_head == _item' failed.
This is a libsane bug, not a colord bug. If you want to to work around it, change /etc/colord.conf to have UseSANE=false -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/826754 Title: colord assert failure: colord: browser.c:701: avahi_service_browser_free: Assertion `*_head == _item' failed. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/colord/+bug/826754/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 823185] Re: [MIR] colord
why does this daemon need to run as root? It's a system activated daemon, just the same as upowerd and packagekitd. Architecturally, it's root as it needs to be accessed from different user sessions, and even in environments like a login manager and other system daemons like CUPS. If you're asking why it couldn't be made to run in a more restricted group set, that's probably a good question. In Fedora and OpenSUSE there's no requirement to choose a private group and user for the daemon, and I'm also not sure what other groups colord would have to be made a member of. If that's really what you want, I can add some options to configure like --with-daemon-username and --with-daemon-group although I would much prefer a patch as I'm not really familiar with all the security and functional implications of running not as root. - org.freedesktop.color-manager.modify-profile appears to read any file on the filesystem. org.freedesktop.color-manager.modify-profile is just the PolicyKit authorization action-id, I'm not sure what you mean there. The only time that authorization is used when the user does SetProperty on the org.freedesktop.ColorManager.Profile interface, and that's not actally reading or writing any files. It reads the entire file (e.g. DoS with /dev/zero), and might do something via lcms parsing Well, in the usual case where the session is passing files to colord, the session just opens the file and passes a file descriptor over dbus to colord. If the session isn't capable of doing that, then the filename is indeed sent, although this breaks security frameworks like selinux pretty hard as then you've got a daemon reading the users files. I'm open for ideas about whether I need futher checks for the /dev/null case. By handcrafting a malicious CreateProfile with a filename of /dev/null and not passing the FD, I get the following output in colord: (colord:14986): Cd-WARNING **: LCMS error 1: Read error. Got 0 bytes, block should be of 128 bytes By using /dev/urandom I basically DoS the daemon (which is expected) and there's not an awful lot that can be done about that as the results would be the same if I just fed a huge ICC profile (a multi-megabyte valid blob) for the daemon to parse. Of course, if there was a parsing bug in the lcms code it's theoretically possible to crash the daemon. Once you've got malicious code running in the session you've got bigger problems than crashing a color daemon, especially if it's going to get auto-restarted on the next use. by default, SearchVolumes is true in the /etc conf file Right, and that's the kind of thing we could add a configure switch for if required. We actually are pretty strict about checking the volume to read profiles, although you could easily crash the daemon if you found a weakness in lcms2, and then created a HFS+ volume with a Library/ColorSync/Profiles/Displays/ path and an hand-crafted color profile. At the end of the day, autoloading the OSX and Windows profiles is a cute trick, but if you think that's at the detriment to security then we can easily turn it off. Richard. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823185 Title: [MIR] colord To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/colord/+bug/823185/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 823185] Re: [MIR] colord
I've applied this to master: commit 3a693ef7d5a949796274f42c7c5e67b933d6ed8f Author: Richard Hughes rich...@hughsie.com Date: Sat Aug 13 19:08:54 2011 +0200 Add a configure argument --enable-volume-search This allows distros to disable the external-volume probing, which may be slightly more secure at the expense of some 'just-workingness'. :100644 100644 933b7e7... 8fbfe55... M configure.ac :100644 100644 460f08d... b3ec91f... M etc/Makefile.am :100644 00 6d60d29... 000... D etc/colord.conf :00 100644 000... 1864f8a... A etc/colord.conf.in commit 7f3514b4e6057f678f50fe67455eecbdf6eb89d3 Author: Richard Hughes rich...@hughsie.com Date: Sat Aug 13 18:41:22 2011 +0200 Add a configure argument of --enable-fd-fallback This defaults to true, and allows distros to disable opening of the user profiles from the daemon. This in theory is a little safer, and does not upset frameworks like SELinux. The downside is that testing is made much harder and all clients have to support FD-passing in DBus messages. :100644 100644 257a03c... c4a7bf4... M Makefile.am :100644 100644 fede541... 933b7e7... M configure.ac :100644 100644 af4e86b... d747c25... M src/cd-profile.c -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823185 Title: [MIR] colord To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/colord/+bug/823185/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 548992] Re: Wireless connection frequently drops [deauthenticating by local choice (reason=3)]
My netbook (atheros) card on 32 bit 10.04 has no problems. My laptop (intel 5100) card on 64 bit 10.04 can connect to wireless network but no internet data throughput following first post-install update. Disabling network manager and installing wicd 'solved' the problem for me. Really would prefer 3G and VPN support through NM though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548992 Title: Wireless connection frequently drops [deauthenticating by local choice (reason=3)] -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 423718] Re: Use Packagekit instead of gnome-app-install.
We would love to use packagekit, but it does not support debconf or conffile prompting. We attempted to contribute those missing features and unfortunately they were not accepted on the ground that a packagekit transaction can not be interrupted (for something like debconf or conffile handling). This is a important feature for us and without it, e.g. sun-java packages do not install. That isn't true at all. Nobody from Ubuntu tried to contribute the missing functionality, but quite a few people insisted I wrote code to connect a VTE widget to the transaction which is very different to what actually needs to be done. Transactions can already be stopped and re-started with different options (see http://www.packagekit.org/gtk-doc/introduction-ideas- transactions.html#introduction-ideas-transactions-sig-install for how all this works) and questions can be put to the user. We already do that for EULAs, GPG keys and extended authentication prompts. We already use the EULA prompts in SUSE, and GPG prompts in Fedora. I'm just not letting a random script ask the user random non-localised questions. I am happy to add any number of abstract questions, as long as they are written in a nice way that other distributions can use. So what i would like to know is, if this may may be possible in a future release of PK or what? Sure, it just needs someone from Ubuntu to contribute the code. I guess it's harder contributing to a shared project than just writing _yet_another_ frontend to apt, but I guess that's the Ubuntu way. I don't want to seem like I'm bashing Ubuntu, as I think it's a great product, just the transparency and upstream ethos still needs quite a lot of work. In a few years time I hope you guys will realize that trying to be the one upstream source for all of the Linux desktop is impossible, and then hopefully will start working with other distributions in public. For what it's worth, Sebastian Heinlein has been doing a great job supporting the apt backend for PackageKit, but the reception PackageKit is getting in Ubuntu (especially for the integration points) is distinctly lukewarm. We need someone interested in this to actually write some code, rather than just decide it's too hard and run away and write more code that will be obsolete (in my opinion) in a few years anyway. If anyone actually wants to implement this, I've written quite a lot about it on the mailing lists, or I would happy to discuss things in person, on a conf call, or even on IRC. Thanks, Richard. -- Use Packagekit instead of gnome-app-install. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423718 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 285323] Re: Losing keyboard and mouse control when changing screen brightness with fn + arrow under intrepid
This is a kernel problem that affects Dell laptops. It has been fixed
upstream by Matthew Garrett. The issue is that some keys on a Dell
laptop do not produce a key down, key up sequence when the button is
pressed, and instead just produce key down and NOT key up. This confuses
X greatly, as more and more keys are being pressed together. This is
fixed in 61579ba83934d397a4fa2bb7372de9ae112587d5 on 15th August in
Linus' tree.
Author: Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri Aug 15 13:54:51 2008 -0400
Input: atkbd - expand Latitude's force release quirk to other Dells
Dell laptops fail to send key up events for several of their special
keys. There's an existing quirk in the kernel to handle this, but it's
limited to the Latitude range. This patch extends it to cover all
portable Dells.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/atkbd.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/atkbd.c
index 4474572..22016ca 100644
--- a/drivers/input/keyboard/atkbd.c
+++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/atkbd.c
@@ -834,10 +834,10 @@ static void atkbd_disconnect(struct serio *serio)
}
/*
- * Most special keys (Fn+F?) on Dell Latitudes do not generate release
+ * Most special keys (Fn+F?) on Dell laptops do not generate release
* events so we have to do it ourselves.
*/
-static void atkbd_latitude_keymap_fixup(struct atkbd *atkbd)
+static void atkbd_dell_laptop_keymap_fixup(struct atkbd *atkbd)
{
const unsigned int forced_release_keys[] = {
0x85, 0x86, 0x87, 0x88, 0x89, 0x8a, 0x8b, 0x8f, 0x93,
@@ -1451,13 +1451,13 @@ static int __init atkbd_setup_fixup(const struct
dmi_system_id *id)
static struct dmi_system_id atkbd_dmi_quirk_table[] __initdata = {
{
- .ident = Dell Latitude series,
+ .ident = Dell Laptop,
.matches = {
DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, Dell Inc.),
- DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, Latitude),
+ DMI_MATCH(DMI_CHASSIS_TYPE, 8), /* Portable */
},
.callback = atkbd_setup_fixup,
- .driver_data = atkbd_latitude_keymap_fixup,
+ .driver_data = atkbd_dell_laptop_keymap_fixup,
},
{
.ident = HP 2133,
--
Losing keyboard and mouse control when changing screen brightness with fn +
arrow under intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285323
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 242176] Re: PackageKit tools don't work
You need to use the same versions of gnome-packagekit and PackageKit at the same time. -- PackageKit tools don't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/242176 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 120258] Re: Laptop Battery Time Remaining Outrageously Inaccurate
Can you open an upstream bug please. Thanks. -- Laptop Battery Time Remaining Outrageously Inaccurate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120258 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 177570] Re: [hardy] two batteries display when left clicking on g-p-m
The kernel is being built with CONFIG_ACPI_BATTERY and CONFIG_POWER_SUPPLY defined. Either use the old or the new interface, but not both. If you have to use both, please use the patch listed above so hal ignores the duplicate. -- [hardy] two batteries display when left clicking on g-p-m https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177570 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 121833] Re: LCD backlight turns off when between discrete levels, both from hotkeys and from dim-on-idle.
Please don't encourage people to work around the problem like that. Please report the problem to upstream HAL or kernel bugzilla. -- LCD backlight turns off when between discrete levels, both from hotkeys and from dim-on-idle. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/121833 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 145131] Re: [Gutsy] Screen constantly flashing while g-p-m is running
Why are you still using acpi_fakekey? Seriously guys, those acpi bodges are horrific. I don't think you can blame gnome-power-manager in this case - it's just doing what it's told. -- [Gutsy] Screen constantly flashing while g-p-m is running https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145131 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 145131] Re: [Gutsy] Screen constantly flashing while g-p-m is running
Anyway, actually we are not *using* acpi_fakekey No, but someone made the choice to hack this in - to be blunt - I'm getting a bugzilla every day about this and people are not generally very polite when filing bugs about a flashing screen. That's like saying let's not blame Microsoft for the crappy Software Well, if a virus scanner puts invasive hacky hooks into the CreateFile API and then saving files in Word stops working - is it microsoft fault or the virus scan vendor? Bear in mind I've spent quite a bit of my time pushing proper solutions into the stack (like INPUT for ACPI key presses) and installing hacks into distros never fixes the problem. Fixing it properly sure takes time but it's the way it has to be done. This is why I still use Fedora. Rant over. -- [Gutsy] Screen constantly flashing while g-p-m is running https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145131 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 76197] Re: icon disappears when dbus is restarted
Restarting dbus fixes all sorts of issues after suspend No, it breaks lots of programs. Seriously, dbus was never designed to be restarted and should not be done. -- icon disappears when dbus is restarted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/76197 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 125999] Re: gnome-power-manager sometimes starts using all RAM
Can somebody open an upstream bug please. Thanks. -- gnome-power-manager sometimes starts using all RAM https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125999 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 122682] Re: Brightness Head-Up dialogue always appears after Idle
Should be fixed in upstream svn. -- Brightness Head-Up dialogue always appears after Idle https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122682 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 123526] Re: g-p-m needs laptop_mode
No, HAL already tries to use pm-utils to do low power actions. Ubuntu should ship pm-utils rather than patch HAL to use laptop_mode. -- g-p-m needs laptop_mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123526 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 127868] Re: gnome-power-manager using between 2% and 10% of cpu.
strace isn't that useful. What about the output of gnome-power-manager --verbose --no-daemon? -- gnome-power-manager using between 2% and 10% of cpu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/127868 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 127089] Re: gnome-power-manager: opens /dev/dsp, locking out audio apps
It should only open the device when it needs to play a warning sound. -- gnome-power-manager: opens /dev/dsp, locking out audio apps https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/127089 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 117745] Re: powertop suggests to remove g-p-m
It is useless to make a software to save power if it does not save power It does save power. The real problem was that DPMS does not give async events on chance, therefor we had to poll. Now the X guys are using xrandr for per-head DPMS we can do this without polling at all. Update g-p-m and watch the recommendation go away. -- powertop suggests to remove g-p-m https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117745 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 60442] Re: Dual / Two Batteries, shutdown on empty expansion battery. (GPM does not recognises second battery on hotplug)
Guys, have you had better luck with 2.19.x? The battery profiling code in 2.19.x should make a lot of these multi-battery issues go away as we profile the system state, not the battery. -- Dual / Two Batteries, shutdown on empty expansion battery. (GPM does not recognises second battery on hotplug) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/60442 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 60442] Re: Dual / Two Batteries, shutdown on empty expansion battery. (GPM does not recognises second battery on hotplug)
/apps/gnome-power-manager/use_time_for_policy needs to be true. It appears the 2-18 and 2-19 code is much more sensible. -- Dual / Two Batteries, shutdown on empty expansion battery. (GPM does not recognises second battery on hotplug) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/60442 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 122929] Re: Battery menu should have an allow suspend option that can be unchecked
Jason, what's the point in putting in specific product enhancements in lauchpad bugs I'm never going to see? The only way I can see it might be useful is if the ubuntu guys actually write the code for the new feature, but I don't think that's very likely. This sort of thing belongs upstream. -- Battery menu should have an allow suspend option that can be unchecked https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122929 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 59589] Re: display sleep time - why 11 minutes
Any chance of a text entry box No, it's against the GNOME HIG. something much larger (like 4 hours) Why so long? -- display sleep time - why 11 minutes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59589 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 122094] Re: Disable compiz/beryl on switch to battery
Any idea what DBUS command would be used? I'm not sure there's infrastructure to do this at the moment. -- Disable compiz/beryl on switch to battery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 121833] Re: LCD backlight turns off when at idle or on battery.
Lenovo laptop? -- LCD backlight turns off when at idle or on battery. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/121833 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 121158] Re: g-p-m should use Composite to dim the screen
g-p-m doesn't, gnome-session and gnome-screensaver do. -- g-p-m should use Composite to dim the screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/121158 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 117745] Re: powertop suggests to remove g-p-m
Just update to 2.18.3, I've made the poll less aggressive. -- powertop suggests to remove g-p-m https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117745 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 110561] Re: Energie Window is to small or wrong scaled
You probably want to report this upstream. -- Energie Window is to small or wrong scaled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110561 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 122038] Re: typing break and g-p-m don't fit well
gnome-typing-monitor needs to monitor gnome-screensaver for idle time detection. -- typing break and g-p-m don't fit well https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122038 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 119318] Re: power manager insists batter is broken
I think it's probably an over-enthusiastic extrapolation No, it's a broken BIOS that doesn't read the battery data, but instead hardcodes some values. My X60 does the same. -- power manager insists batter is broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 119318] Re: power manager insists batter is broken
the manager could simply do what it did before it had the new profiling features. Some batteries don't give out rate, or if they do, it's _wildly_ inaccurate. Seriously, sometimes it's out my an order of magnitude. -- power manager insists batter is broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119318 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 67986] Re: g-p-m crashes when having wireless keyboard attached
Fixed ages ago (9months?) on upstream 2-16 and 1-18. -- g-p-m crashes when having wireless keyboard attached https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67986 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 62087] Re: Charge in W and charge rate in Wh
Already fixed upstream ages ago. -- Charge in W and charge rate in Wh https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/62087 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 72234] Re: Thinkpad won't go to sleep if lid is closed and the AC adapter is unplugged
See the FAQ. You can change the behaviour in gconf-editor. -- Thinkpad won't go to sleep if lid is closed and the AC adapter is unplugged https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/72234 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92436] Re: Password is required twice after laptop sleep
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 43169 *** Guys, see this: http://hughsient.livejournal.com/19481.html - You might want to grab the latest 2-18 branch and try that. Richard. -- Password is required twice after laptop sleep https://launchpad.net/bugs/92436 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
