[Bug 540280] Re: openssh (or gvfs) asks for a password everytime I change directory in sftp
The same bug here. To use sftp after having installed nautilus-bzr is failing with openssh asking for password again and again and again and again -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540280 Title: openssh (or gvfs) asks for a password everytime I change directory in sftp To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bzr-gtk/+bug/540280/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 655044] Re: olive-gtk recommanded by bzr-gtk but not existing
Thanks Jelmer for that clarification. I understand the situation albeit it's a sad news for me as I was a huge fan of olive. -- olive-gtk recommanded by bzr-gtk but not existing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655044 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment
To refuse change because it's different is BAD. To change only because it's different is BAD. Anyway, good decision comes from good rationale (except maybe in casinos). Where's the rationale here ? None is explained. Where's the benefit here ? None is explained. What's the risk ? The risk is to force a change in user's habits without visible reasons. He should not appreciate even if he'll get use to with time. Even if it's far from being a big deal it really looks like a bad decision. I love Ubuntu and its community and thank all the teams (devs, designers, managers ...) providing to the community this wonderful desktop. So after all, the design team may really have a killer idea to use that vacuum on the right. Time will say, but waiting for explanation/rationale on that subject it will be (for me) nothing more than a bad decision. -- [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 458129] Re: Can't encode without subtitles
Thanks for the fix in the PPA. It's running fine for me. -- Can't encode without subtitles https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/458129 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 348843] Re: [darkroom] warning when displaying the credits of an About dialog
Same here with Karmic 64bits. human-theme 0.37 gtk2-engines-murrine 0.90.3-1ubuntu2 the following line (in /usr/share/themes/DarkRoom/gtk-2.0/gtkrc) seems to be the origin of the problem : GtkWidget ::visited-link-color = shade (0.2, @fg_color) If I comment it out = no more warning. If I replace it by : GtkWidget ::visited-link-color = @fg_color or GtkWidget ::visited-link-color = darker(@fg_color) ... no more problem neither. I'm not a theme expert but I don't see what's wrong with shade (0.2, @fg_color) ?? Any idea? Should I rather file a bug against gtk2-engines-murrine? -- [darkroom] warning when displaying the credits of an About dialog https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348843 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 364630] Re: [FFe] Clutter 0.8 - 1.0 transition
status for *clutter-cairo (Ubuntu)* is invalid because there's no clutter-cairo with Clutter 1.0 as it has been integrated in Clutter itself. ** Changed in: clutter-cairo (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- [FFe] Clutter 0.8 - 1.0 transition https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364630 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 369696] Re: package gedit-plugins 2.26.1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
While I still have the bug on a i386 fresh Jaunty Install, I had no problem at all during the upgrade to jaunty of my 64b box ?!? Plugins are there and running (package gedit-plugins 2.26.1-0ubuntu1). Weird... -- package gedit-plugins 2.26.1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 369696] Re: package gedit-plugins 2.26.1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
I can confirm this bug on a i386 version of this package. Bug reported Bug #364618 This bug is making the mess on my system. I can't reinstall, I can't remove and it blocks other package updates (= I don't know how to fix that by hand). -- package gedit-plugins 2.26.1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 364618] [NEW] gedit-plugins_2.26.1-0ubuntu1_i386.deb install failed
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gedit-plugins
Description:Ubuntu 9.04
Release:9.04
Traceback when trying to install or reinstall gedit-
plugins_2.26.1-0ubuntu1_i386.deb
Partially in French sorry :
Préparation du remplacement de gedit-plugins 2.26.1-0ubuntu1 (en utilisant
.../gedit-plugins_2.26.1-0ubuntu1_i386.deb) ...
dpkg (sous-processus) : impossible d'exécuter ancien script pre-removal: Erreur
de format pour exec()
dpkg : avertissement - ancien script pre-removal a retourné un code d'erreur de
sortie 2
dpkg - tentative d'exécution du script du nouveau paquet à la place ...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/pycentral, line 2190, in module
main()
File /usr/bin/pycentral, line 2184, in main
rv = action.run(global_options)
File /usr/bin/pycentral, line 1639, in run
pkg = DebPackage('package', self.args[0], oldstyle=False)
File /usr/bin/pycentral, line 377, in __init__
self.read_pyfiles()
File /usr/bin/pycentral, line 408, in read_pyfiles
self.pkgconfig.set('pycentral', 'include-links', '0')
File /usr/lib/python2.6/ConfigParser.py, line 669, in set
ConfigParser.set(self, section, option, value)
File /usr/lib/python2.6/ConfigParser.py, line 377, in set
raise NoSectionError(section)
ConfigParser.NoSectionError: No section: 'pycentral'
dpkg : erreur de traitement de
/var/cache/apt/archives/gedit-plugins_2.26.1-0ubuntu1_i386.deb (--unpack) :
le sous-processus nouveau script pre-removal a retourné une erreur de sortie
d'état 1
dpkg (sous-processus) : impossible d'exécuter post-installation script: Erreur
de format pour exec()
dpkg : erreur lors du nettoyage :
le sous-processus post-installation script a retourné une erreur de sortie
d'état 2
Des erreurs ont été rencontrées pendant l'exécution :
/var/cache/apt/archives/gedit-plugins_2.26.1-0ubuntu1_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
** Affects: gedit-plugins (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
gedit-plugins_2.26.1-0ubuntu1_i386.deb install failed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364618
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 364618] Re: gedit-plugins_2.26.1-0ubuntu1_i386.deb install failed
Forgot to mention that I've filed a new bug even if Bug #346976 is similar because version here is 2.26.1 -- gedit-plugins_2.26.1-0ubuntu1_i386.deb install failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364618 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 364630] [NEW] not updated to mainstream 0.8.2
Public bug reported: Description:Ubuntu 9.04 Release:9.04 package : python-clutter 0.8.0-1build1 This package has not been updated to latest available mainstream. Latest available is 0.8.2 (10-Dec-2008) http://www.clutter-project.org/sources/pyclutter/0.8/ And we are only 0.8.0 (15-Oct-2008). 0.8.2 offers bug fixes and a much complete binding of Clutter's COGL API ** Affects: pyclutter (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- not updated to mainstream 0.8.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364630 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 205356] Re: compiz.real crashed with signal 7
Same Here 64b c2d on an updated Itrepid beta -- compiz.real crashed with signal 7 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205356 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267478] Re: Please remove pyclutter from Intrepid archive
an official pyclutter 0.8 has been released. Is there any chance to get it in Intrepid ? -- Please remove pyclutter from Intrepid archive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267478 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
