[Bug 876721] Re: java swing JTable repaint issue with nvidia graphics
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1101348 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1101348 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1032936 Scrolling right in java apps distorts screen ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1101348 xrender pipeline creates graphics corruption -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/876721 Title: java swing JTable repaint issue with nvidia graphics To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/876721/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1032936] Re: Scrolling right in java apps distorts screen
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1101348 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1101348 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1101348 xrender pipeline creates graphics corruption -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032936 Title: Scrolling right in java apps distorts screen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openjdk/+bug/1032936/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1101348] Re: xrender pipeline creates graphics corruption
** Bug watch added: Iced Tea Bugzilla #2571 http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2571 ** Also affects: openjdk via http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2571 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1101348 Title: xrender pipeline creates graphics corruption To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openjdk/+bug/1101348/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1479703] Re: package openjdk-7-jre-headless (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/etc/java-7-openjdk/fontconfig.properties', which is different from other instan
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. I would like you to run a few additional commands and reply with their output in order to determine what is causing the issue. Run the following 3 commands in any order, then copy and paste the result of each: 1. dpkg -S /etc/java-7-openjdk/fontconfig.properties 2. dpkg -l 'openjdk*' 3. apt-cache policy openjdk-7-jre-headless Did you ever manually edited or changed the /etc/java-7-openjdk/fontconfig.properties file? Thanks! ** Changed in: openjdk-7 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1479703 Title: package openjdk-7-jre-headless (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/etc/java-7-openjdk/fontconfig.properties', which is different from other instances of package openjdk-7-jre-headless:amd64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-7/+bug/1479703/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1472480] Re: package openjdk-7-jre-headless (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: a tentar sobreescrever '/etc/java-7-openjdk/fontconfig.properties' partilhado, que é diferente de outras ins
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. I would like you to run a few additional commands and reply with their output in order to determine what is causing the issue. Run the following 3 commands in a terminal any order, then copy and paste the result of each: 1. dpkg -S /etc/java-7-openjdk/fontconfig.properties 2. dpkg -l 'openjdk*' 3. apt-cache policy openjdk-7-jre-headless Did you ever manually edited or changed the /etc/java-7-openjdk/fontconfig.properties file? Thanks! ** Changed in: openjdk-7 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1472480 Title: package openjdk-7-jre-headless (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: a tentar sobreescrever '/etc/java-7-openjdk/fontconfig.properties' partilhado, que é diferente de outras instâncias do pacote openjdk-7-jre-headless:amd64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-7/+bug/1472480/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1461895] Re: error in X11 XGetInputFocus
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, we cannot work on this bug because you are using a custom Java install in /usr/local/java/ as well as a custom JNA jar instead of Ubuntu packages. Please try again after installing the packages java-7-jdk and libjna- platform-java. Please refer to https://help.ubuntu.com/community/InstallingSoftware#Installing_a_Package on how to install them. If you wish to continue using your local installed OpenJDK and JNA, please report this issue directly to the JNA project at https://github.com/twall/jna Thanks! ** Changed in: openjdk-7 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1461895 Title: error in X11 XGetInputFocus To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-7/+bug/1461895/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1232322] Re: Failed to write core dump. Core dumps have been disabled
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, we cannot work on this bug because your description didn't include enough information and different issues were reported under the same bug. You may find it helpful to read How to report bugs effectively http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html. We'd be grateful if you would then provide a more complete description of the problem. We have instructions on debugging some types of problems at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProcedures At a minimum, we need: 1. the specific steps or actions you took that caused you to encounter the problem, 2. the behavior you expected, and 3. the behavior you actually encountered (in as much detail as possible). Thanks! ** Changed in: openjdk-7 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1232322 Title: Failed to write core dump. Core dumps have been disabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-7/+bug/1232322/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1232322] Re: Failed to write core dump. Core dumps have been disabled
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, we cannot work on this bug because your description didn't include enough information. We'd be grateful if you would then provide a more complete description of the problem. We have instructions on debugging some types of problems at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProcedures At a minimum, we need: 1. the specific steps or actions you took that caused you to encounter the problem, 2. the behavior you expected, and 3. the behavior you actually encountered (in as much detail as possible). Thanks! ** Changed in: scilab (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1232322 Title: Failed to write core dump. Core dumps have been disabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-7/+bug/1232322/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1389493] Re: Package dropped pulse-java.jar, breaking some development environments
Could you please provide additional information on what Eclipse version was being run? I was not able to reproduce it on Trusty using Eclipse 3.8.1-5.1 on Trusty (AMD64). Steps to test: 1. Run Eclipse, create a Java Project (not sure this was needed), close 2. Manually rename any jar file inside a JRE/JDK lib that is configured in Eclipse (eg. icedtea-audio.jar - pulse-audio.jar) 3. Start Eclipse again 4. Verify that Eclipse did properly detect the new/renamed jar files for any and all configured JRE's I believe the original error was actually on Eclipse and not OpenJDK. Eclipse should have been able do detect JAR changes on a JRE environment and update its internal state accordingly. Since it is behaving in the expected way now it should be safe to close this. Thanks! ** Changed in: openjdk-7 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1389493 Title: Package dropped pulse-java.jar, breaking some development environments To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-7/+bug/1389493/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1480047] [NEW] failure to build on wily proposed due to wrong LDFLAGS usage
Public bug reported: quota build in Wily proposed is failing due to '-ltirpc' being added to LDFLAGS instead of LIBS. As stated in https://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/DSOLinking#Only_link_with_needed_libraries and http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/manual/autoconf-2.60/html_node /Preset-Output-Variables.html#index-LDFLAGS-93 libraries must be added to LIBS instead of LDFLAGS. The attached debdiff fixed the issue by: 1. Moving the '-ltirpc' entry from LDFLAGS to LIBS in debian/rules 2. Adding a $(LIBS) entry to binaries builds in Makefile.in ** Affects: quota (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: ftbfs patch ** Patch added: fix Wily proposed build by moving lirpc from LDFLAGS to LIBS https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1480047/+attachment/4436621/+files/move-tirpc-to-libs.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to quota in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1480047 Title: failure to build on wily proposed due to wrong LDFLAGS usage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quota/+bug/1480047/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1480047] [NEW] failure to build on wily proposed due to wrong LDFLAGS usage
Public bug reported: quota build in Wily proposed is failing due to '-ltirpc' being added to LDFLAGS instead of LIBS. As stated in https://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/DSOLinking#Only_link_with_needed_libraries and http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/manual/autoconf-2.60/html_node /Preset-Output-Variables.html#index-LDFLAGS-93 libraries must be added to LIBS instead of LDFLAGS. The attached debdiff fixed the issue by: 1. Moving the '-ltirpc' entry from LDFLAGS to LIBS in debian/rules 2. Adding a $(LIBS) entry to binaries builds in Makefile.in ** Affects: quota (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: ftbfs patch ** Patch added: fix Wily proposed build by moving lirpc from LDFLAGS to LIBS https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1480047/+attachment/4436621/+files/move-tirpc-to-libs.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1480047 Title: failure to build on wily proposed due to wrong LDFLAGS usage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quota/+bug/1480047/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1480047] Re: failure to build on wily proposed due to wrong LDFLAGS usage
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #794190 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794190 ** Also affects: quota (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794190 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1480047 Title: failure to build on wily proposed due to wrong LDFLAGS usage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quota/+bug/1480047/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1480047] Re: failure to build on wily proposed due to wrong LDFLAGS usage
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #794190 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794190 ** Also affects: quota (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794190 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to quota in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1480047 Title: failure to build on wily proposed due to wrong LDFLAGS usage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quota/+bug/1480047/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1479474] Re: failure to detect libbsd on build due to wrong LDFLAGS usage
** Tags added: ftbfs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1479474 Title: failure to detect libbsd on build due to wrong LDFLAGS usage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libedit/+bug/1479474/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1479542] [NEW] merge Debian 4.3-13 and 4.3-11ubuntu3
Public bug reported: Following the instructions under http://packaging.ubuntu.com/html/udd- merging.html I was able to merge the 4.3.13 package from Debian to 4.3-11ubuntu3. The debdiff is attached. Please notice that I decided to remove the '#privmode.diff' entry from debian/patches/series since this diff file was removed previously. ** Affects: bash (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Patch added: debdiff between 4.3-11ubuntu3 and 4.3.13-ubuntu1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1479542/+attachment/4435946/+files/merge-debian-4.3-13-to-4.3-11ubuntu3.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1479542 Title: merge Debian 4.3-13 and 4.3-11ubuntu3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1479542/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1479474] [NEW] failure to detect libbsd on build due to wrong LDFLAGS usage
Public bug reported: libedit build in Wily proposed is failing due to LIBBSD_LIBS being added to LDFLAGS instead of LIBS. As stated in https://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/DSOLinking#Only_link_with_needed_libraries and http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/manual/autoconf-2.60/html_node /Preset-Output-Variables.html#index-LDFLAGS-93 libraries must be added to LIBS instead of LDFLAGS. The attached debdiff fixed the issue. ** Affects: libedit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Patch added: replace LDFLAGS with LIBS to fix Wily proposed build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1479474/+attachment/4435852/+files/fix_libbsd.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1479474 Title: failure to detect libbsd on build due to wrong LDFLAGS usage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libedit/+bug/1479474/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1479474] Re: failure to detect libbsd on build due to wrong LDFLAGS usage
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #794009 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794009 ** Also affects: libedit (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794009 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1479474 Title: failure to detect libbsd on build due to wrong LDFLAGS usage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libedit/+bug/1479474/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1479474] Re: failure to detect libbsd on build due to wrong LDFLAGS usage
** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1479474 Title: failure to detect libbsd on build due to wrong LDFLAGS usage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libedit/+bug/1479474/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
