[Bug 1396379] Re: installer uses first EFI system partition found even when directed otherwise

[chester]

So, what is the actual reason of the bug if you verified it with 21.10
but you also checked that it's setting a correct value?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1396379

Title:
  installer uses first EFI system partition found even when directed
  otherwise

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1396379/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1396379] Re: installer uses first EFI system partition found even when directed otherwise

[chester]

I just came across this bug after being forced to reinstall my main OS - I got 
my grub altered despite making no mistake when installing parallel ubuntu on 
different device.
I was using 20.04 LTS and I am extremely disappointed with the reason: old bug 
that made installer not trusted. Fortunately it was my private computer and I 
was able to make backup of all files so the restoration won't take more than 
hours.
For me this should not only be *critical* but fixed and backported into all 
supported editions, LTS including. It's very dangerous and time/money consuming 
error.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1396379

Title:
  installer uses first EFI system partition found even when directed
  otherwise

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1396379/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1954340] [NEW] Fan stopped working after firmware upgrade

[Chester]

Public bug reported:

There was a firmware upgrade available this morning that I did. After
that when I boot up my computer I noticed it was getting very hot. I
then realized that the fan was no longer blowing. I don't remember
exactly what the upgrade notes said but I recall it had something to do
with either fan or CPU. The fan works before the OS starts but once the
computer starts to boot the fan stops blowing even if the computer is
very hot (Over 90 degrees Celsius).

Possible confounding factors:
My boot partition was too small and I was getting problems doing installations. 
I've since reinstalled to increase the size.

1) lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 21.10
Release:21.10

2) Not sure which package. Occurred after a firmware upgrade I installed
this morning.

3) I expect the fan to blow like I used to (I think it was always on but
for sure it would come on if the temperature went up)

4) The fan does not come on even if the CPU temp goes over 90 degrees
Celsius.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10
Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:21.10.8
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-22.22-generic 5.13.19
Uname: Linux 5.13.0-22-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu70
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CrashDB: ubuntu
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Thu Dec  9 17:31:10 2021
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-12-09 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.10 "Impish Indri" - Release amd64 (20211012)
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_CA:en
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_CA.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
Symptom: ubuntu-release-upgrader
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug dist-upgrade impish wayland-session

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1954340

Title:
  Fan stopped working after firmware upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1954340/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1246384] Re: xserver-common-lts-raring does not always get correctly removed.

[matthew chester]

Thanx you, you did fix it!!!

On Aug 23, 2017 12:46 AM, "Timo Aaltonen"  wrote:

> there are no diversions anymore in more recent lts/hwe packages, so
> closing as fixed
>
> ** No longer affects: dpkg (Ubuntu)
>
> ** Changed in: xorg-lts-transitional (Ubuntu)
>Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1246384
>
> Title:
>   xserver-common-lts-raring does not always get correctly removed.
>
> Status in xorg-lts-transitional package in Ubuntu:
>   Fix Released
>
> Bug description:
>   Upgrades from 12.04 LTS to future dists may result in xserver-common-
>   lts-raring being unremovable.
>
>   Removing xserver-common-lts-raring ...
>   Removing 'diversion of /usr/lib/xorg/protocol.txt to
> /usr/lib/xorg/protocol-precise.txt by xserver-common-lts-raring'
>   dpkg-divert: error: rename involves overwriting
> `/usr/lib/xorg/protocol.txt' with
> different file `/usr/lib/xorg/protocol-precise.txt', not allowed
>   dpkg: error processing xserver-common-lts-raring (--remove):
>subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 2
>   Errors were encountered while processing:
>xserver-common-lts-raring
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-lts-
> transitional/+bug/1246384/+subscriptions
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1246384

Title:
  xserver-common-lts-raring does not always get correctly removed.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-lts-transitional/+bug/1246384/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1594740] Re: Supervisor not enabled or started in Ubuntu 16.04 after installation

[Chester]

Also have this problem with a fresh install of 16.04. Thank you for the
bug report, and hope it gets fixed soon.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1594740

Title:
  Supervisor not enabled or started in Ubuntu 16.04 after installation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/supervisor/+bug/1594740/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1322004] [NEW] Unable to adjust screen brightness

[Will Chester]

Public bug reported:

I am using an Acer V5-122P which uses the AMD Radeon 8250 graphics card.
I am unable to adjust the backlight brightness, except that on battery
if I try to toggle the brightness using the hotkeys up and down
repeatedly, I am able to adjust the backlight brightness to the lowest
setting. I am using Ubuntu 14.04 and fglrx, but the problem persists
when using the open source xorg-radeon/ati driver. I have been
experiencing this problem with all kernels and versions of Ubuntu since
12.04 with no changes as I've upgraded.

I have entries in /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/ for brightness,
max_brightness, actual_brightness, bl_power, type, device, subsystem,
power, and uevent.. Directly echoing values into brightness does not
make any changes to the screen brightness.

Happy to answer any other questions or try any workarounds.

Thanks,

Will

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: linux-image-3.13.0-24-generic 3.13.0-24.47
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-24.47-generic 3.13.9
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-24-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3
Architecture: amd64
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC1:  will   2915 F pulseaudio
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  will   2915 F pulseaudio
CurrentDesktop: Unity
Date: Wed May 21 23:49:10 2014
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=1cc8d8ae-deb7-4f44-a51b-1942c71e46fe
InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-07-20 (305 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 Raring Ringtail - Release amd64 (20130424)
MachineType: Acer Aspire V5-122P
ProcFB: 0 VESA VGA
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-24-generic 
root=UUID=b71ee9d9-bc02-4546-b41b-40305aed185c ro radeon.dpm=1 radeon.modeset=0 
quiet splash vt.handoff=7
RelatedPackageVersions:
 linux-restricted-modules-3.13.0-24-generic N/A
 linux-backports-modules-3.13.0-24-generic  N/A
 linux-firmware 1.127.2
SourcePackage: linux
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2014-05-02 (19 days ago)
dmi.bios.date: 04/16/2013
dmi.bios.vendor: Insyde Corp.
dmi.bios.version: V2.02.
dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag
dmi.board.name: Aspire V5-122P
dmi.board.vendor: Acer
dmi.board.version: V2.02.
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: Acer
dmi.chassis.version: V2.02.
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnInsydeCorp.:bvrV2.02.:bd04/16/2013:svnAcer:pnAspireV5-122P:pvrV2.02.:rvnAcer:rnAspireV5-122P:rvrV2.02.:cvnAcer:ct10:cvrV2.02.:
dmi.product.name: Aspire V5-122P
dmi.product.version: V2.02.
dmi.sys.vendor: Acer

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Confirmed


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1322004

Title:
  Unable to adjust screen brightness

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1322004/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1315834] Re: 1002:983d [Acer Aspire V5-122P] Unable to adjust screen brightness

[Will Chester]

Chris,

Apologies for the delay submitting the bug report. I have now submitted a new 
bug at the following location and have subscribed you:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1322004

Let me know what else I can do to help with this.

Additionally, Lewis, the workaround you put forth doesn't work for me. I
don't have a radeon_bl0 entry in my /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/
folder. This may be because I'm using the fglrx driver and it looks like
you're currently using the radeon driver.

Thanks,

Will

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1315834

Title:
  1002:983d [Acer Aspire V5-122P] Unable to adjust screen brightness

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1315834/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1315834] Re: 1002:983d [Acer Aspire V5-122P] Unable to adjust screen brightness

[Will Chester]

Lewis and Chris,

I can confirm that I am experiencing the same behavior as Lewis. I have
used both the open source radeon/ati drivers as well as the proprietary
fglrx drivers (I'm currently using the fglrx-updates package
(2:13.350.1-0ubuntu2) from the Ubuntu repos). I have not yet tried the
14.4 version of fglrx, but can verify that the issue is still present
with the proprietary drivers installed.

I'm not sure if this is relevant or not, but when the laptop is
unplugged it looks as if the contrast is reduced in line with a decrease
in backlight, but the brightness is not similarly reduced. For example,
everything looks washed out and there is very little contrast. If you
then play with the brightness hotkeys and are able to reduce the
backlight to it's lowest settings (reducing the brightness), the
contrast/brightness balance is back to normal (at the lowest brightness
setting). These are the only two brightness levels that I can get
working - full brightness and lowest brightness.

I was able to use a workaround detailed here:
http://ati.cchtml.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711#c54 to get appropriate
contrast/brightness balance on battery at the highest brightness level,
but I am still unable to change the backlight settings beyond lowest or
highest brightness.

Hope that helps. Thank you for looking into this.

** Bug watch added: ATi Linux Platform Bugs #711
   http://ati.cchtml.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1315834

Title:
  1002:983d [Acer Aspire V5-122P] Unable to adjust screen brightness

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1315834/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1246384] Re: xserver-common-lts-raring does not always get correctly removed.

[matthew chester]

ubuntu version 13.04

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1246384

Title:
  xserver-common-lts-raring does not always get correctly removed.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server-lts-raring/+bug/1246384/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1162884] Re: apport-gtk crashed with EOFError in _read_exact(): Compressed file ended before the end-of-stream marker was reached

[matthew chester]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1168849 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1168849

is there a way to fix it yet???

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1162884

Title:
  apport-gtk crashed with EOFError in _read_exact(): Compressed file
  ended before the end-of-stream marker was reached

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1162884/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1246384] Re: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 2

[matthew chester]

oh  it also makes my software center say it can't install anything
untill xserver-common-lts-raring is removed

** Description changed:

  everytime i start my computer it says i have a problem then asks me if i
  want to partial upgrade it and when i do i get subprocess installed
  post-removal script returned error exit status 2 when it was trying to
  remove xserver-common-lts-raring and it keeps sending me through a
  loop please someone help...
+ 
+ oh it also makes my software center say it can't install anything untill
+ xserver-common-lts-raring is removed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1246384

Title:
  subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1246384/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1246384] [NEW] subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 2

[matthew chester]

Public bug reported:

everytime i start my computer it says i have a problem then asks me if i
want to partial upgrade it and when i do i get subprocess installed
post-removal script returned error exit status 2 when it was trying to
remove xserver-common-lts-raring and it keeps sending me through a
loop please someone help...

oh it also makes my software center say it can't install anything untill
xserver-common-lts-raring is removed

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1246384

Title:
  subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1246384/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1246384] Re: xserver-common-lts-raring does not always get correctly removed.

[matthew chester]

ok how do you remove the dpkg-divert command i'm still new to unbuntu
and about the package when i run sudo apt-get update upgrade it says Failed 
to fetch http://dl.google.com/linux/deb/dists/stable/Release  Unable to find 
expected entry 'non-free/binary-i386/Packages' in Release file (Wrong 
sources.list entry or malformed file)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1246384

Title:
  xserver-common-lts-raring does not always get correctly removed.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/1246384/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1246384] Re: xserver-common-lts-raring does not always get correctly removed.

[matthew chester]

sorry the package is; (xserver-common-Its-raring
2:1.13.3-0ubuntu6~precise3 [origion: unknown]

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1246384

Title:
  xserver-common-lts-raring does not always get correctly removed.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/1246384/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1078068] Re: Video blinking blue during incoming call

[Chester]

Same thing here (Intel 82865G). Would not be so much of an issue if we
could turn off the self-image (PIP), as it only happens when the two
videos are shown...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078068

Title:
  Video blinking blue during incoming call

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skype/+bug/1078068/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1171078] [NEW] software center wont open

[matthew chester]

Public bug reported:

Whenever i click on ubuntu software center it wont stop loading and when
I close it, it says software center is not responding and gives me 2
options to force quit or cancel can someone help me plz

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1171078

Title:
  software center wont open

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1171078/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1063682] Re: Screensaver settings GUI is confusing

[Will Chester]

After today's update to gnome-screensaver I am now having an issue with
the screensaver lock. I can use the ctrl+alt+L combo to lock the screen,
but it doesn't automatically lock after the screen turns off. I've
restarted my computer and tried a number of combinations, but nothing
works.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063682

Title:
  Screensaver settings GUI is confusing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/1063682/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1063787] Re: Can not enable timed screen lock without turning off the screen

[Will Chester]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1063682 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063682

I'm experiencing the same issue. Ubuntu 12.10 upgrade from 12.04. I can
lock the screen using ctrl+alt+l, but it won't lock automatically after
the time interval selected in All Settings - Brightness and Lock -
Lock screen after:

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063787

Title:
  Can not enable timed screen lock without turning off the screen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1063787/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1063682] Re: Screensaver settings GUI is confusing

[Will Chester]

Thanks for the explanation Jonathan! I was confused by this as well.
Something along the lines of your suggested changes would definitely
help.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063682

Title:
  Screensaver settings GUI is confusing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/1063682/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1063787] Re: Can not enable timed screen lock without turning off the screen

[Will Chester]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1063682 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063682

Found the solution. It's really a wording issue. You have to add the times from 
Turn screen off when inactive for and Lock screen after to get the total 
time before the screen locks. I found the solution here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/1063682

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063787

Title:
  Can not enable timed screen lock without turning off the screen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1063787/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1019917] Re: System sitting idle when bug appeared

[Chester Wilson]

** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1019917

Title:
  System sitting idle when bug appeared

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba4/+bug/1019917/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1003113] [NEW] package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

[Chester Hagerbaumer]

Public bug reported:

This error pops up after I uninstalled samba from my machine.  I did
several reboots and it is still there.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.38-generic 3.2.16
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7
AptOrdering:
 samba: Install
 tdb-tools: Install
 samba: Configure
 tdb-tools: Configure
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mon May 21 16:28:40 2012
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit 
status 1
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release amd64 
(20120425)
SourcePackage: samba
Title: package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess 
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package need-duplicate-check precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003113

Title:
  package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
  installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1003113/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 1003113] Re: package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

[Chester Hagerbaumer]

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003113

Title:
  package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
  installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1003113/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

Re: [Bug 988509] Re: setoption.pl is not executable

[Chester Hagerbaumer]

Since I uninstalled samba4 and ran an update, my problems seem to have 
gone away.

Thanks to all for their efforts in getting this resolved!


On 05/22/2012 08:40 AM, Gary Krolak wrote:
 Thanks for your efforts.  Mine also happened as a result of upgrading to
 12.04.  I uninstalled Samba4 and I'm running Samba with no problems.
 Everything is very stable.  Thanks again.


 -Original Message-
 From: boun...@canonical.com [mailto:boun...@canonical.com] On Behalf Of robert
 Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 7:02 AM
 To: gkro...@verizon.net
 Subject: Re: [Bug 988509] Re: setoption.pl is not executable

 system running fine now. Thanks

 On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:30 AM, jahmusic988...@bugs.launchpad.net
 wrote:

 In my case, the error took place after a system update, not because I
 tried to install Samba 4 by itself

 On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Jelmer Vernooij
 988...@bugs.launchpad.netwrote:

 Unfortunately it looks like Samba4 is accidentally being installed
 by some people who are looking for the stable version of Samba
 (Samba 4 is still experimental, see the package description). I
 wonder if this is the case, and if so, how this is happening?

 I'm working on backporting this fix to precise - that seems useful
 anyway. Even with that, the server side of Samba 4 is still
 experimental and the version in precise will soon be obsolete.

 --
 You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
 duplicate bug report (1002293).
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988509

 Title:
   setoption.pl is not executable

 Status in “samba4” package in Ubuntu:
   Fix Released
 Status in “samba4” source package in Precise:
   In Progress

 Bug description:
   tried to install samba4

   ProblemType: Package
   DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
   Package: samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2
   ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-23.36-generic 3.2.14
   Uname: Linux 3.2.0-23-generic x86_64
   NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
   ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu5
   Architecture: amd64
   Date: Wed Apr 25 21:50:00 2012
   ErrorMessage: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript
 gab
 den
 Fehlerwert 126 zurück
   InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Beta amd64
 (20120417)
   SourcePackage: samba4
   Title: package samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2 failed to
 install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript
 gab den Fehlerwert 126 zurück
   UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba4/+bug/988509/+subscrip
 tions

 --
 Dr David C. Smith

 --
 You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
 duplicate bug report (989973).
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988509

 Title:
   setoption.pl is not executable

 Status in “samba4” package in Ubuntu:
   Fix Released
 Status in “samba4” source package in Precise:
   In Progress

 Bug description:
   tried to install samba4

   ProblemType: Package
   DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
   Package: samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2
   ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-23.36-generic 3.2.14
   Uname: Linux 3.2.0-23-generic x86_64
   NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
   ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu5
   Architecture: amd64
   Date: Wed Apr 25 21:50:00 2012
   ErrorMessage: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab
 den Fehlerwert 126 zurück
   InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Beta amd64
 (20120417)
   SourcePackage: samba4
   Title: package samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2 failed to
 install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript
 gab den Fehlerwert 126 zurück
   UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

 To manage notifications about this bug go to:
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba4/+bug/988509/+subscrip
 tions


 --
 Die Stimme des Intellekts ist leise, aber sie ruht nicht, ehe sie sich Gehoer 
 verschafft hat.
   Sigmund Freud

 --
 You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a duplicate 
 bug report (995340).
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988509

 Title:
setoption.pl is not executable

 Status in “samba4” package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
 Status in “samba4” source package in Precise:
In Progress

 Bug description:
tried to install samba4

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-23.36-generic 3.2.14
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-23-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu5
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed Apr 25 21:50:00 2012
ErrorMessage: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den 
 Fehlerwert 126 zurück
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Beta amd64 
 (20120417)
SourcePackage: samba4
Title: package samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2 failed to 
 install/upgrade: Unterprozess 

[Bug 1003113] [NEW] package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

[Chester Hagerbaumer]

Public bug reported:

This error pops up after I uninstalled samba from my machine.  I did
several reboots and it is still there.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.38-generic 3.2.16
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7
AptOrdering:
 samba: Install
 tdb-tools: Install
 samba: Configure
 tdb-tools: Configure
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mon May 21 16:28:40 2012
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit 
status 1
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release amd64 
(20120425)
SourcePackage: samba
Title: package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess 
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package need-duplicate-check precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003113

Title:
  package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
  installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1003113/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1003113] Re: package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

[Chester Hagerbaumer]

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003113

Title:
  package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
  installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1003113/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1002055] [NEW] package samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 126

[Chester Hagerbaumer]

Public bug reported:

samba4 install errors

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic 3.2.14
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sun May 20 13:23:07 2012
ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script 
returned error exit status 126
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release amd64 
(20120425)
SourcePackage: samba4
Title: package samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: 
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit 
status 126
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: samba4 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1002055

Title:
  package samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
  ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned
  error exit status 126

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba4/+bug/1002055/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1002055] Re: package samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 126

[Chester Hagerbaumer]

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1002055

Title:
  package samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
  ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned
  error exit status 126

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba4/+bug/1002055/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 729490] Re: The update icon missing

[Chester Cullen]

** Also affects: ubuntu
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/729490

Title:
  The update icon missing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linuxmint/+bug/729490/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 860208] Re: Shrew Soft VPN no longer establishes a connection

[Mark Chester]

Downgrading to these packages has restored VPN connectivity for me.
ike_2.1.5+dfsg-2 
ike-qtgui_2.1.5+dfsg-2 

I used the Natty packages found here:
http://packages.ubuntu.com/natty/ike

Download the above packages. (make sure you select the right architecture)
Remove both 2.1.7 packages using the Ubuntu Software Center (you need to search 
for ike and show the technical items to see both packages).
Right-click the downloaded ike 2.1.5 deb package
Choose Open With Ubuntu Software Center and click install.
Repeat for the Ike-qtgui 2.1.5 package.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/860208

Title:
  Shrew Soft VPN no longer establishes a connection

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ike/+bug/860208/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 860208] Re: Shrew Soft VPN no longer establishes a connection

[Mark Chester]

To prevent Update Manager from upgrading to 2.1.7, create the following
2 files:

/etc/apt/preferences.d/ike, which contains these lines:
Package: ike
Pin: version 2.1.5+dfsg-2
Pin-Priority: 1010

And /etc/apt/preferences.d/ike-qtgui, which contains these lines:
Package: ike-qtgui
Pin: version 2.1.5+dfsg-2
Pin-Priority: 1011

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/860208

Title:
  Shrew Soft VPN no longer establishes a connection

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ike/+bug/860208/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 860208] Re: Shrew Soft VPN no longer establishes a connection

[Mark Chester]

I did a complete remove and install of the Shrew Soft VPN.  It appears
to be unable to properly install the IKE packages.  Note half-
installed and half-configured lines in the log below.

From /var/log/dpkg.log

2011-10-17 22:47:03 startup archives unpack
2011-10-17 22:47:08 install ike 2.1.7+dfsg-1build1 2.1.7+dfsg-1build1
2011-10-17 22:47:08 status half-installed ike 2.1.7+dfsg-1build1
2011-10-17 22:47:08 status triggers-pending ureadahead 0.100.0-11
2011-10-17 22:47:09 status half-installed ike 2.1.7+dfsg-1build1
2011-10-17 22:47:09 status triggers-pending man-db 2.6.0.2-2
2011-10-17 22:47:09 status half-installed ike 2.1.7+dfsg-1build1
2011-10-17 22:47:09 status unpacked ike 2.1.7+dfsg-1build1
2011-10-17 22:47:09 status unpacked ike 2.1.7+dfsg-1build1
2011-10-17 22:47:09 install ike-qtgui none 2.1.7+dfsg-1build1
2011-10-17 22:47:09 status half-installed ike-qtgui 2.1.7+dfsg-1build1
2011-10-17 22:47:09 status half-installed ike-qtgui 2.1.7+dfsg-1build1
2011-10-17 22:47:09 status triggers-pending desktop-file-utils 0.18-0ubuntu8
2011-10-17 22:47:09 status half-installed ike-qtgui 2.1.7+dfsg-1build1
2011-10-17 22:47:09 status triggers-pending gnome-menus 3.2.0-0ubuntu2
2011-10-17 22:47:09 status half-installed ike-qtgui 2.1.7+dfsg-1build1
2011-10-17 22:47:09 status triggers-pending bamfdaemon 0.2.104-0ubuntu1
2011-10-17 22:47:09 status half-installed ike-qtgui 2.1.7+dfsg-1build1
2011-10-17 22:47:09 status unpacked ike-qtgui 2.1.7+dfsg-1build1
2011-10-17 22:47:09 status unpacked ike-qtgui 2.1.7+dfsg-1build1
2011-10-17 22:47:10 trigproc ureadahead 0.100.0-11 0.100.0-11
2011-10-17 22:47:10 status half-configured ureadahead 0.100.0-11
2011-10-17 22:47:10 status installed ureadahead 0.100.0-11
2011-10-17 22:47:10 trigproc man-db 2.6.0.2-2 2.6.0.2-2
2011-10-17 22:47:10 status half-configured man-db 2.6.0.2-2
2011-10-17 22:47:12 status installed man-db 2.6.0.2-2
2011-10-17 22:47:12 trigproc desktop-file-utils 0.18-0ubuntu8 0.18-0ubuntu8
2011-10-17 22:47:12 status half-configured desktop-file-utils 0.18-0ubuntu8
2011-10-17 22:47:12 status installed desktop-file-utils 0.18-0ubuntu8
2011-10-17 22:47:12 trigproc gnome-menus 3.2.0-0ubuntu2 3.2.0-0ubuntu2
2011-10-17 22:47:12 status half-configured gnome-menus 3.2.0-0ubuntu2
2011-10-17 22:47:12 status installed gnome-menus 3.2.0-0ubuntu2
2011-10-17 22:47:12 trigproc bamfdaemon 0.2.104-0ubuntu1 0.2.104-0ubuntu1
2011-10-17 22:47:12 status half-configured bamfdaemon 0.2.104-0ubuntu1
2011-10-17 22:47:12 status installed bamfdaemon 0.2.104-0ubuntu1
2011-10-17 22:47:13 startup packages configure
2011-10-17 22:47:13 configure ike 2.1.7+dfsg-1build1 none
2011-10-17 22:47:13 status unpacked ike 2.1.7+dfsg-1build1
2011-10-17 22:47:13 status unpacked ike 2.1.7+dfsg-1build1
2011-10-17 22:47:13 status unpacked ike 2.1.7+dfsg-1build1
2011-10-17 22:47:13 status half-configured ike 2.1.7+dfsg-1build1
2011-10-17 22:47:14 status installed ike 2.1.7+dfsg-1build1
2011-10-17 22:47:14 configure ike-qtgui 2.1.7+dfsg-1build1 none
2011-10-17 22:47:14 status unpacked ike-qtgui 2.1.7+dfsg-1build1
2011-10-17 22:47:14 status half-configured ike-qtgui 2.1.7+dfsg-1build1
2011-10-17 22:47:14 status installed ike-qtgui 2.1.7+dfsg-1build1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/860208

Title:
  Shrew Soft VPN no longer establishes a connection

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ike/+bug/860208/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 860208] Re: Shrew Soft VPN no longer establishes a connection

[Mark Chester]

This is a blocker for me as I can no longer use my workstation for
remote access.  Need a solution or workaround ASAP.  Please update with
expected fix time line.  Thanks.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/860208

Title:
  Shrew Soft VPN no longer establishes a connection

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ike/+bug/860208/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 860208] Re: Shrew Soft VPN no longer establishes a connection

[Mark Chester]

root@mark:/var/log# tail -n 25 syslog
Oct 17 22:17:24 mark NetworkManager[1116]: warn 
/sys/devices/virtual/net/tap0: couldn't determine device driver; ignoring...
Oct 17 22:18:04 mark avahi-daemon[1096]: Withdrawing workstation service for 
tap0.
Oct 17 22:18:04 mark NetworkManager[1116]:SCPlugin-Ifupdown: devices 
removed (path: /sys/devices/virtual/net/tap0, iface: tap0)
Oct 17 22:19:06 mark NetworkManager[1116]:SCPlugin-Ifupdown: devices added 
(path: /sys/devices/virtual/net/tap0, iface: tap0)
Oct 17 22:19:06 mark NetworkManager[1116]:SCPlugin-Ifupdown: device added 
(path: /sys/devices/virtual/net/tap0, iface: tap0): no ifupdown configuration 
found.
Oct 17 22:19:06 mark NetworkManager[1116]: warn 
/sys/devices/virtual/net/tap0: couldn't determine device driver; ignoring...
Oct 17 22:19:16 mark avahi-daemon[1096]: Withdrawing workstation service for 
tap0.
Oct 17 22:19:16 mark NetworkManager[1116]:SCPlugin-Ifupdown: devices 
removed (path: /sys/devices/virtual/net/tap0, iface: tap0)
Oct 17 22:21:15 mark NetworkManager[1116]:SCPlugin-Ifupdown: devices added 
(path: /sys/devices/virtual/net/tap0, iface: tap0)
Oct 17 22:21:15 mark NetworkManager[1116]:SCPlugin-Ifupdown: device added 
(path: /sys/devices/virtual/net/tap0, iface: tap0): no ifupdown configuration 
found.
Oct 17 22:21:15 mark NetworkManager[1116]: warn 
/sys/devices/virtual/net/tap0: couldn't determine device driver; ignoring...
Oct 17 22:21:20 mark avahi-daemon[1096]: Withdrawing workstation service for 
tap0.
Oct 17 22:21:20 mark NetworkManager[1116]:SCPlugin-Ifupdown: devices 
removed (path: /sys/devices/virtual/net/tap0, iface: tap0)
Oct 17 22:22:18 mark AptDaemon: INFO: Quitting due to inactivity
Oct 17 22:22:18 mark AptDaemon: INFO: Quitting was requested
Oct 17 22:22:44 mark NetworkManager[1116]:SCPlugin-Ifupdown: devices added 
(path: /sys/devices/virtual/net/tap0, iface: tap0)
Oct 17 22:22:44 mark NetworkManager[1116]:SCPlugin-Ifupdown: device added 
(path: /sys/devices/virtual/net/tap0, iface: tap0): no ifupdown configuration 
found.
Oct 17 22:22:44 mark NetworkManager[1116]: warn 
/sys/devices/virtual/net/tap0: couldn't determine device driver; ignoring...
Oct 17 22:23:14 mark avahi-daemon[1096]: Withdrawing workstation service for 
tap0.
Oct 17 22:23:14 mark NetworkManager[1116]:SCPlugin-Ifupdown: devices 
removed (path: /sys/devices/virtual/net/tap0, iface: tap0)
Oct 17 22:26:25 mark NetworkManager[1116]:SCPlugin-Ifupdown: devices added 
(path: /sys/devices/virtual/net/tap0, iface: tap0)
Oct 17 22:26:25 mark NetworkManager[1116]:SCPlugin-Ifupdown: device added 
(path: /sys/devices/virtual/net/tap0, iface: tap0): no ifupdown configuration 
found.
Oct 17 22:26:25 mark NetworkManager[1116]: warn 
/sys/devices/virtual/net/tap0: couldn't determine device driver; ignoring...
Oct 17 22:27:05 mark avahi-daemon[1096]: Withdrawing workstation service for 
tap0.
Oct 17 22:27:05 mark NetworkManager[1116]:SCPlugin-Ifupdown: devices 
removed (path: /sys/devices/virtual/net/tap0, iface: tap0)

root@mark:/var/log# cat iked.log 
11/10/17 22:17:01 ## : IKE Daemon, ver 2.1.7
11/10/17 22:17:01 ## : Copyright 2010 Shrew Soft Inc.
11/10/17 22:17:01 ## : This product linked OpenSSL 1.0.0e 6 Sep 2011
11/10/17 22:17:01 K! : recv X_SPDDUMP message failure ( errno = 2 )

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/860208

Title:
  Shrew Soft VPN no longer establishes a connection

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ike/+bug/860208/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 289467] Re: Samsung SyncMaster 2493HM support

[chester]

@Will:
Mostly it is a problem with the monitor Samsung 2493hm which does not suppord 
EDID properly. But that is the problem with most of Samsung's monitors and 
ddccontrol supports them somehow (I don't know, how - maybe by  some 
pre-defined signatures for mapping random EDID to proper data?)
So it is in my opinion a bug in ddccontrol which should (somehow ) support that 
monitor. I provided all the information needed and on request can provide even 
more. I'm not a C developer but I am skilled enough to run some tests if any 
defeloper needs a testing assistance.

@Fred:
Your XML does not work for me. I don't remember for what reason, most problably 
because it links to another XML which I didn't posess. I use Ubuntu 10.04, if 
it helps you. (But it might be another reason - many months passed and I am not 
100% sure). 

Anyway - this is the only real bug which remained, it is very strange
for me that any of the developers didn't manage to find little time to
solve it given all the data in this thread and readiness of users' to
assist. I understand that developers work in their free time but if they
work they should pay their attention - few years passed...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289467

Title:
  Samsung SyncMaster 2493HM support

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ddccontrol/+bug/289467/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 289467] Re: Samsung SyncMaster 2493HM support

[chester]

Refreshing - This bug will be THREE YEARS OLD with the publication of
next Ubuntu release and... since two years nobody touched it... I can
provide all the information necessary to any developer who can repair
this package. It is very annoying and problematic to use xorg.conf when
this file is obsolete for so long :(

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289467

Title:
  Samsung SyncMaster 2493HM support

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 312756] Re: MASTER: support graphics card hot switch

[Chester Husk III]

Asus ul80v w/ nVidia GT218


chester@Apollo:~/Dropbox$ sudo dmidecode -s system-product-name  sudo 
dmidecode -s system-version
UL80VT  
1.0   
chester@Apollo:~/Dropbox$ lspci -vnnn | perl -lne 'print if 
/^\d+\:.+(\[\S+\:\S+\])/' | grep VGA
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series 
Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:2a42] (rev 07) (prog-if 00 [VGA 
controller])
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: nVidia Corporation GT218 [GeForce 
G210M] [10de:0a74] (rev a2) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])


** Attachment added: DSDT.dsl
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/312756/+attachment/1800179/+files/DSDT.dsl

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/312756

Title:
  MASTER: support graphics card hot switch

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 289467] Re: Samsung SyncMaster 2493HM support

[chester]

For those, who cannot wait for this bug being solved, below comes the
monitor section for xorg.conf which worked perfectly on my configuration
(Laptop +external monitor connected via VGA cable):

Section Monitor
Identifier Samsung
Option IgnoreEDID True
Option RightOf Configured Monitor
modeline 1920x1200-60 154.128 1920 1968 2000 2080 1200 1203 1209 1235 +hsync 
-vsync
Option PreferredMode 1920x1200-60
Option dpms
Gamma 1.0
EndSection 

However this does mean that in future versions of Ubuntu we will have
the same problem until someone smart enough will fix this bug with wrong
EDID.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289467

Title:
  Samsung SyncMaster 2493HM support

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 289467] Re: Samsung SyncMaster 2493HM support

[chester]

Bug still exists in Ubuntu 10.10.
I have Lenovo 3000 V200 notebook with Intel VGA (VGA compatible controller: 
Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03) )

I did changes to GRUB file mentioned above, but it didn't helped :-(

My monitor is detected as Unknown. Max resolution available is 1360x768.
The only difference against the comment by InterAnt written on 2010-05-02 is 
that he had:
I/O warning : failed to load external entity 
/usr/share/ddccontrol-db/monitor/SAM0368.xml
And I had:
I/O warning : failed to load external entity 
/usr/share/ddccontrol-db/monitor/SEC4241.xml

I looked at /var/log/syslog and while trying to detect the monitor via 
System-Preferences-Monitors i got in syslog such message:
Dec  3 22:57:19 enigma kernel: [ 9146.246038] [drm:drm_edid_block_valid] 
*ERROR* EDID checksum is invalid, remainder is 230
Dec  3 22:57:19 enigma kernel: [ 9146.246046] [drm:drm_edid_block_valid] 
*ERROR* Raw EDID:
(and here goes raw output in 8 lines)

Please, help - xorg.conf was removed from Ubuntu, everything should be
automatic and such problems are very annoying

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289467

Title:
  Samsung SyncMaster 2493HM support

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 289467] Re: Samsung SyncMaster 2493HM support

[chester]

Bug still exists in Ubuntu 10.10.
I have Lenovo 3000 V200 notebook with Intel VGA (VGA compatible controller: 
Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03) )

I did changes to GRUB file mentioned above, but it didn't helped :-(

My monitor is detected as Unknown. Max resolution available is 1360x768.
The only difference against the comment by InterAnt written on 2010-05-02 is 
that he had:
I/O warning : failed to load external entity 
/usr/share/ddccontrol-db/monitor/SAM0368.xml
And I had:
I/O warning : failed to load external entity 
/usr/share/ddccontrol-db/monitor/SEC4241.xml

I looked at /var/log/syslog and while trying to detect the monitor via 
System-Preferences-Monitors i got in syslog such message:
Dec  3 22:57:19 enigma kernel: [ 9146.246038] [drm:drm_edid_block_valid] 
*ERROR* EDID checksum is invalid, remainder is 230
Dec  3 22:57:19 enigma kernel: [ 9146.246046] [drm:drm_edid_block_valid] 
*ERROR* Raw EDID:
(and here goes raw output in 8 lines)

Please, help - xorg.conf was removed from Ubuntu, everything should be
automatic and such problems are very annoying

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289467

Title:
  Samsung SyncMaster 2493HM support

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 289467] Re: Samsung SyncMaster 2493HM support

[chester]

Added syslog with raw output of EDID error

** Attachment added: syslog's edid error
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ddccontrol/+bug/289467/+attachment/1754649/+files/syslog.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289467

Title:
  Samsung SyncMaster 2493HM support

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 674594] [NEW] IBus preference dialog only opens after repeated attempts

[Will Chester]

Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: ibus

I am using Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick and ibus-1.3.7-1ubuntu3.

In order to begin inputting a language using ibus you are required to
add that language in the preferences dialog. I clicked on the ibus
indicator applet and selected preferences. I expected the preferences
dialog to open, but it did not. I repeated this process three more
times, and it finally opened. After this initial opening, the
preferences dialog opens on the first selection. I am not sure if the
initial opening is simply delayed, or must be repeated a number of times
to work.

** Affects: ibus (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
IBus preference dialog only opens after repeated attempts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/674594
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 665328] [NEW] The gcalctool display is too small to show long operations, and there is no way to resize or scroll

[Will Chester]

Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gcalctool

When performing operations that extend beyond the two and a half rows of
characters, there is no way to scroll down to see the remaining parts of
the operation. There is also no way to make the application larger,
which would in turn make the display larger.

** Affects: gcalctool (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
The gcalctool display is too small to show long operations, and there is no way 
to resize or scroll
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665328
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 665328] Re: When performing operations that extend beyond the two and a half rows of characters, there is no way to scroll down to see the remaining parts of the operation.

[Will Chester]

** Attachment added: Calculator_002.png
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665328/+attachment/1707306/+files/Calculator_002.png

** Summary changed:

- When performing operations that extend beyond the two and a half rows of 
characters, there is no way to scroll down to see the remaining parts of the 
operation.
+ The gcalctool display is too small to display long operations, and there is 
no way to scroll

** Summary changed:

- The gcalctool display is too small to display long operations, and there is 
no way to scroll
+ The gcalctool display is too small to display long operations, and there is 
no way to resize or scroll

** Summary changed:

- The gcalctool display is too small to display long operations, and there is 
no way to resize or scroll
+ The gcalctool display is too small to show long operations, and there is no 
way to resize or scroll

-- 
The gcalctool display is too small to show long operations, and there is no way 
to resize or scroll
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665328
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 526796] Re: No sound applet on the gnome panel

[Will Chester]

I had a similar problem. I installed Maverick, keeping my home directory
from Lucid, and after a short time my sound indicator and me menu
disappeared. I tried reconfiguring the indicator-sound and indicator-me
packages, with no success. Then I happened upon this page, which
described how to get the menus back. I'm not sure if this will fix
everyone's problems here, but it worked for me.

http://ubuntugenius.wordpress.com/2010/05/04/restore-missing-volume-
button-to-system-tray-after-upgrade-to-ubuntu-10-04/

-- 
No sound applet on the gnome panel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526796
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 526796] Re: No sound applet on the gnome panel

[Will Chester]

To clarify, all I did was right click on the panel, add to panel, and
chose to add the indicator applet to the panel. After that my sound and
me menu indicators came back.

-- 
No sound applet on the gnome panel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526796
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 645471] [NEW] wrong color for padding around corners of progress bar

[Will Chester]

Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: software-center

I am using the daily build of Maverick for 9/22. When installing a
package from the More Info page, the padding around the corners of the
progress bar in the blue bar underneath the package title is the wrong
color. It should be changed to be the same color as the blue bar itself.

** Affects: software-center (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
wrong color for padding around corners of progress bar
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645471
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 641513] [NEW] package secvpn 2.22 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

[ed chester]

Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: secvpn

invoked automatically from package manager

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: secvpn 2.22
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.42-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: i386
Date: Fri Sep 17 19:56:34 2010
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit 
status 1
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429)
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: secvpn
Title: package secvpn 2.22 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed 
post-installation script returned error exit status 1

** Affects: secvpn (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386 lucid

-- 
package secvpn 2.22 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed 
post-installation script returned error exit status 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 641513] Re: package secvpn 2.22 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

[ed chester]

** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641513/+attachment/1599201/+files/AptOrdering.txt

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641513/+attachment/1599202/+files/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: Df.txt
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641513/+attachment/1599203/+files/Df.txt

** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641513/+attachment/1599204/+files/Dmesg.txt

** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641513/+attachment/1599205/+files/DpkgTerminalLog.txt

-- 
package secvpn 2.22 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed 
post-installation script returned error exit status 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641513
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 326773] Re: E: dpkg was interrupted, you must manually run 'dpkg --configure -a' to correct the problem. E: _cache-open() failed, please report.

[Colin Wilson Chester]

This seems to be a common problem but what is the answer?

-- 
E: dpkg was interrupted, you must manually run 'dpkg --configure -a' to correct 
the problem.  E: _cache-open() failed, please report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326773
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 452814] Re: WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/net/ipv4/tcp.c:1408 tcp_recvmsg+0xa49/0xb20()

[Chester]

UPDATE: after I removed Sun's JDK (which I had downloaded from
http://java.sun.com) the problem disappeared. Since then I installed the
JDK using the standard package management (Synaptic/APT) and so far I
had two entire days without any warning.

-- 
WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/net/ipv4/tcp.c:1408 
tcp_recvmsg+0xa49/0xb20()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452814
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 471932] [NEW] package openoffice.org-emailmerge 1:3.0.1-9ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1

[Chester Haugland]

Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: openoffice.org

This bug occurred during a update manager session.  I looked in
system monitor to see if I could find the running processes that I was
asked to shut down.  I could not find them running. (I later changed the
system monitor view options to all processes and dependencies and
could see some openoffice processes running.)

I upgraded last week to 9.10 when it was released.  I reported an
openoffice.org-emailmerge bug at that time also.

ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
Date: Mon Nov  2 15:37:58 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 
1
Package: openoffice.org-emailmerge 1:3.0.1-9ubuntu3.1
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic
SourcePackage: openoffice.org
Title: package openoffice.org-emailmerge 1:3.0.1-9ubuntu3.1 failed to 
install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit 
status 1
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic i686

** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386

-- 
package openoffice.org-emailmerge 1:3.0.1-9ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/471932
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 471932] Re: package openoffice.org-emailmerge 1:3.0.1-9ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1

[Chester Haugland]

** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34993132/AptOrdering.txt

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34993133/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34993134/Dmesg.txt

** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34993135/DpkgTerminalLog.txt

-- 
package openoffice.org-emailmerge 1:3.0.1-9ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/471932
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 463605] Re: package_hook crashed with IOError in write()

[Chester Haugland]

** Attachment added: ApportLog.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34617450/ApportLog.txt

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34617451/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34617454/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34617455/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment added: Traceback.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34617456/Traceback.txt

** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
package_hook crashed with IOError in write()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463605
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 463595] Re: landscape-sysinfo crashed with ImportError in module()

[Chester Haugland]

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34616833/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34616834/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34616835/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment added: Traceback.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34616836/Traceback.txt

** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
landscape-sysinfo crashed with ImportError in module()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463595
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 463612] [NEW] package openoffice.org-emailmerge 1:3.0.1-9ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade:

[Chester Haugland]

Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: openoffice.org

bug reported during upgrade from 9.4 to 9.10 using automated tool
update manager.

ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
Date: Thu Oct 29 10:54:56 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ErrorMessage:
 ErrorMessage: package openoffice.org-emailmerge is already installed and 
configured
Package: openoffice.org-emailmerge 1:3.0.1-9ubuntu3.1
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.28-16.55-generic
SourcePackage: openoffice.org
Title: package openoffice.org-emailmerge 1:3.0.1-9ubuntu3.1 failed to 
install/upgrade:
Uname: Linux 2.6.28-16-generic i686

** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386

-- 
package openoffice.org-emailmerge 1:3.0.1-9ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463612
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 463612] Re: package openoffice.org-emailmerge 1:3.0.1-9ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade:

[Chester Haugland]

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34618277/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34618281/VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz

** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34618282/VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz

** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34618283/VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz

** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34618284/VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz

-- 
package openoffice.org-emailmerge 1:3.0.1-9ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463612
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 463623] Re: gvfs-gdu-volume-monitor crashed with SIGSEGV in gdu_pool_get_presentables()

[Chester Haugland]

** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34618491/CoreDump.gz

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34618492/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34618493/Disassembly.txt

** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34618494/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34618495/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment added: Registers.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34618496/Registers.txt

** Attachment added: Stacktrace.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34618497/Stacktrace.txt

** Attachment added: ThreadStacktrace.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34618498/ThreadStacktrace.txt

** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
gvfs-gdu-volume-monitor crashed with SIGSEGV in gdu_pool_get_presentables()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463623
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 463655] Re: package openmpi-bin 1.3.2-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

[Chester Haugland]

** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34620711/AptOrdering.txt

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34620713/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34620714/Dmesg.txt

** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34620715/DpkgTerminalLog.txt

-- 
package openmpi-bin 1.3.2-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess 
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463655
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 463655] [NEW] package openmpi-bin 1.3.2-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

[Chester Haugland]

Public bug reported:

Bug occurred after reboot from upgrade of 9.4 to 9.10.  Ran upgrade
manager which then did a partial upgrade because of previous problems.
Bug occurred during the partial upgrade.

ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
Date: Thu Oct 29 12:35:56 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit 
status 2
Package: openmpi-bin 1.3.2-3ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic
SourcePackage: openmpi
Title: package openmpi-bin 1.3.2-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess 
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic i686

** Affects: openmpi (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386

-- 
package openmpi-bin 1.3.2-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess 
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463655
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 463660] [NEW] package openoffice.org-emailmerge 1:3.0.1-9ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade:

[Chester Haugland]

Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: openoffice.org

Bug occurred after reboot from upgrade of 9.4 to 9.10. Ran upgrade
manager which then did a partial upgrade because of previous problems.
Bug occurred during the partial upgrade.

ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
Date: Thu Oct 29 12:35:56 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ErrorMessage:
 ErrorMessage: package openoffice.org-emailmerge is already installed and 
configured
Package: openoffice.org-emailmerge 1:3.0.1-9ubuntu3.1
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic
SourcePackage: openoffice.org
Title: package openoffice.org-emailmerge 1:3.0.1-9ubuntu3.1 failed to 
install/upgrade:
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic i686

** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386

-- 
package openoffice.org-emailmerge 1:3.0.1-9ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463660
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 463660] Re: package openoffice.org-emailmerge 1:3.0.1-9ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade:

[Chester Haugland]

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34620879/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34620880/VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz

** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34620881/VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz

** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34620883/VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz

** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34620886/VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz

** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeXorgfixintrepidlog.gz
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34620888/VarLogDistupgradeXorgfixintrepidlog.gz

-- 
package openoffice.org-emailmerge 1:3.0.1-9ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463660
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 359794] [NEW] Adding a SMB Network folder to favorites located under places

[Chester]

Public bug reported:

When i add a Network folder let's say SMB://luna/ It goes directly to
this folder with no problem. It mounts the network folder etc.

But the problem start when you bookmark this folder. When bookmarked i
drag the icon, in this example Luna, to my favorites. So i can directly
access the network folder from my desktop, because it's located under
places.

Places
 |
 --- Home Folder
 --- Desktop
 --- Documents
 --- Music
 --- Pictures
 --- Videos 
 --- Luna

Like the above example I should access the folder by clicking on Luna.

But when i click on the Luna network folder I get the following error.

Could not open location 'smb://luna/'
No application is registered as handling this file

I then have to first go to my home folder, so it's opening Nautilus
(believe it's called nautilus), than i access the network folder Luna. I
believe this is a bug, because it should know what to do with
smb://luna/ it should automatically open nautilus and go to the network
folder.

I hope i explained it correctly this way.

Using :

Ubuntu jaunty (development branch)
Release:9.04
linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic

Greetz Fabian.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Adding a SMB Network folder to favorites located under places
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359794
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 211387] Re: Nvidia 6600GT Drivers, never getting the right resolutions, only when booting in safe mode.

[Chester]

Sorry that i didn't reply sooner.

But the link u gave me Matthew, i put the method down how i did it. I
bit less steps :D And working perfectly now :D

-- 
Nvidia 6600GT Drivers, never getting the right resolutions, only when booting 
in safe mode.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211387
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 211387] [NEW] Nidia 6600GT Drivers, never getting the right resolutions, only when booting in safe mode.

[Chester]

Public bug reported:

Ubuntu Release:
Description:Ubuntu hardy (development branch)
Release:8.04
Ubuntu 2.6.22-14.52-generic

After updating from 7.10 to 8.04 with all the newest updates i installed
the proprietary hardware drivers which Ubuntu suggested to install. But
whenever i reboot my system, Ubuntu will tell me it have to run in low
graphics mode. And i cant get my resolution to 1280 by 1024.

The only way i can make my monitor to work under the right resolution is
to reboot in recovery mode, and restore X server. Then i'll resume
booting, but this way i cant get a second monitor to run or anything.

The weirdest thing is that i haven't had any problems in 7.10 with the
resolutions or anything. It took some time to get there but eventually i
got there, even the second monitor. But i tried everything in 8.04 but
with no avail.

My video graphics card is a: Sparkle Nvidia GeForce 6600GT
And i have 2 * 19 LCD Monitors of the brand Acer AL1922

I hope i gave enough information here, if anyone need anything more,
please ask. And sorry if my English is a bit poor :D

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Nidia 6600GT Drivers, never getting the right resolutions, only when booting in 
safe mode.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211387
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 211387] Re: Nidia 6600GT Drivers, never getting the right resolutions, only when booting in safe mode.

[Chester]

** Description changed:

  Ubuntu Release:
  Description:  Ubuntu hardy (development branch)
  Release:  8.04
  Ubuntu 2.6.22-14.52-generic
  
  After updating from 7.10 to 8.04 with all the newest updates i installed
  the proprietary hardware drivers which Ubuntu suggested to install. But
  whenever i reboot my system, Ubuntu will tell me it have to run in low
  graphics mode. And i cant get my resolution to 1280 by 1024.
  
  The only way i can make my monitor to work under the right resolution is
- to reboot in safe mode, and restore X server. Then i'll resume booting,
- but this way i cant get a second monitor to run or anything.
+ to reboot in recovery mode, and restore X server. Then i'll resume
+ booting, but this way i cant get a second monitor to run or anything.
  
  The weirdest thing is that i haven't had any problems in 7.10 with the
  resolutions or anything. It took some time to get there but eventually i
  got there, even the second monitor. But i tried everything in 8.04 but
  with no avail.
  
- My videocard is a: Sparkle Nvidia GeForce 6600GT
+ My video graphics card is a: Sparkle Nvidia GeForce 6600GT
  And i have 2 * 19 LCD Monitors of the brand Acer AL1922
  
  I hope i gave enough information here, if anyone need anything more,
  please ask. And sorry if my English is a bit poor :D

-- 
Nidia 6600GT Drivers, never getting the right resolutions, only when booting in 
safe mode.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211387
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 211387] Re: Nidia 6600GT Drivers, never getting the right resolutions, only when booting in safe mode.

[Chester]

** Attachment added: Logs.rar
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13095784/Logs.rar

-- 
Nidia 6600GT Drivers, never getting the right resolutions, only when booting in 
safe mode.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211387
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs