[Bug 1432386] Re: Some Gramps Windows show no place for lists
I've solved the problem in sound-juicer by editing : /usr/share/sound-juicer/sound-juicer.ui and adding property name=expandTrue/property there : object class=GtkTreeView id=albums_listview property name=visibleTrue/property property name=can_focusTrue/property property name=expandTrue/property /object Could the same thing be done with Gramps? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1432386 Title: Some Gramps Windows show no place for lists To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gramps/+bug/1432386/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1432386] Re: Some Gramps Windows show no place for lists
The same problem appears with Sound Juicer : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sound-juicer/+bug/1307484 Same reason? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1432386 Title: Some Gramps Windows show no place for lists To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gramps/+bug/1432386/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1307484] Re: multiple entries window is hard to use
The same problem appears with Gramps : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gramps/+bug/1432386 Same reason? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307484 Title: multiple entries window is hard to use To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sound-juicer/+bug/1307484/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1432386] [NEW] Some Gramps Windows show no place for lists
Public bug reported: GRAMPS: 4.0.3-1 Python: 2.7.6 (default, Mar 22 2014, 22:59:38) [... BSDDB: 5.3.0 (5, 3, 28) LANG: fr_FR.UTF-8 OS: Linux Distribution: 3.13.0-46-generic (ubuntu 14.04 32b) Some tools windows witch intend to show a results lists do not give enough height to be usable envent though the entire window seems to be big enough (see screen capture). ** Affects: gramps (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: bug-affichage-gramps3.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1432386/+attachment/4346348/+files/bug-affichage-gramps3.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1432386 Title: Some Gramps Windows show no place for lists To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gramps/+bug/1432386/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1432386] Re: Some Gramps Windows show no place for lists
more screen capture ** Attachment added: bug-affichage-gramps.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gramps/+bug/1432386/+attachment/4346349/+files/bug-affichage-gramps.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1432386 Title: Some Gramps Windows show no place for lists To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gramps/+bug/1432386/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1432386] Re: Some Gramps Windows show no place for lists
** Attachment added: bug-affichage-gramps2.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gramps/+bug/1432386/+attachment/4346350/+files/bug-affichage-gramps2.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1432386 Title: Some Gramps Windows show no place for lists To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gramps/+bug/1432386/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1256087] Re: package spamassassin (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1
I don't understand this new status : I'm not affected by the spamassassin malfunction because I removed it. But anytime I tried to reinstall it, the problem would happen again. Regards -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to spamassassin in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1256087 Title: package spamassassin (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spamassassin/+bug/1256087/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1256087] Re: package spamassassin (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1
I don't understand this new status : I'm not affected by the spamassassin malfunction because I removed it. But anytime I tried to reinstall it, the problem would happen again. Regards -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1256087 Title: package spamassassin (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spamassassin/+bug/1256087/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1256087] [NEW] package spamassassin (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1
Public bug reported: This bug happens since 13.04. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10 Package: spamassassin (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-14.21-generic 3.11.7 Uname: Linux 3.11.0-14-generic i686 ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2.1 Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Nov 28 20:28:50 2013 DuplicateSignature: package:spamassassin:(not installed):le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 ErrorMessage: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-05-25 (187 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 Raring Ringtail - Release i386 (20130424) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: spamassassin Title: package spamassassin (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to saucy on 2013-10-19 (40 days ago) ** Affects: spamassassin (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 saucy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to spamassassin in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1256087 Title: package spamassassin (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spamassassin/+bug/1256087/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1256087] Re: package spamassassin (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1
I just removed Spamassassin --purge. Sould'nt report error anymore! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to spamassassin in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1256087 Title: package spamassassin (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spamassassin/+bug/1256087/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1256087] Re: package spamassassin (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1
I just removed Spamassassin --purge. Sould'nt report error anymore! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1256087 Title: package spamassassin (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spamassassin/+bug/1256087/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1256087] [NEW] package spamassassin (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1
Public bug reported: This bug happens since 13.04. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10 Package: spamassassin (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-14.21-generic 3.11.7 Uname: Linux 3.11.0-14-generic i686 ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2.1 Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Nov 28 20:28:50 2013 DuplicateSignature: package:spamassassin:(not installed):le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 ErrorMessage: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-05-25 (187 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 Raring Ringtail - Release i386 (20130424) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: spamassassin Title: package spamassassin (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to saucy on 2013-10-19 (40 days ago) ** Affects: spamassassin (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 saucy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1256087 Title: package spamassassin (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spamassassin/+bug/1256087/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1208410] [NEW] package spamassassin 3.3.2-6ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Fresh install on a new computer. Spams are not sorted out. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: spamassassin 3.3.2-6ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-23.34-generic 3.8.11 Uname: Linux 3.8.0-23-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 2.9.2-0ubuntu8.1 Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Aug 3 19:42:31 2013 DuplicateSignature: package:spamassassin:3.3.2-6ubuntu1:subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-05-25 (71 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 Raring Ringtail - Release i386 (20130424) MarkForUpload: True PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: spamassassin Title: package spamassassin 3.3.2-6ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: spamassassin (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 raring -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to spamassassin in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208410 Title: package spamassassin 3.3.2-6ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spamassassin/+bug/1208410/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1208410] [NEW] package spamassassin 3.3.2-6ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Fresh install on a new computer. Spams are not sorted out. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: spamassassin 3.3.2-6ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-23.34-generic 3.8.11 Uname: Linux 3.8.0-23-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx ApportVersion: 2.9.2-0ubuntu8.1 Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Aug 3 19:42:31 2013 DuplicateSignature: package:spamassassin:3.3.2-6ubuntu1:subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-05-25 (71 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 Raring Ringtail - Release i386 (20130424) MarkForUpload: True PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: spamassassin Title: package spamassassin 3.3.2-6ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: spamassassin (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 raring -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1208410 Title: package spamassassin 3.3.2-6ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spamassassin/+bug/1208410/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 804094] [NEW] Sound recorder tool make etoys quit
Public bug reported: On Ubuntu 11.04 32 bits, the sound recorder tool make etoys quit. I've tried with the etoys to go version witch works well. I've been told it was caused by the use of a OSS library. ** Affects: etoys (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804094 Title: Sound recorder tool make etoys quit To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/etoys/+bug/804094/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 769703] Re: Unity launcher does not auto hide when dragging music in clementine or other Qt softwares
Le jeudi 23 juin 2011 à 14:18 +, ubeagle a écrit : Still unfixed and very annoying. There is a newer duplicate bug #784520 which says that toggling Num Lock makes the launcher hide again as well. This trick works well with LibreOffice calc. François -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/769703 Title: Unity launcher does not auto hide when using dragging in Qt softwares To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/769703/+subscriptions -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 780962] Re: Conflict with unity dock
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 769703 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/769703 Le lundi 20 juin 2011 à 13:50 +, Daniel Manrique a écrit : I'm moving this bug to Unity, and setting it as a duplicate of bug 769703 which describes the same problem. All further reporting should be done on the primary bug. Hi Daniel, Ok, I'll follow this bug 769703 now. Regards, François -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780962 Title: Conflict with unity dock To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/780962/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 780962] Re: Conflict with unity dock
Le mardi 07 juin 2011 à 20:35 +, francoisb a écrit : Le mardi 07 juin 2011 à 19:07 +, Daniel Manrique a écrit : This will help us to find and resolve the problem. If the problem only appears occasionally and you have no clear way of triggering it, it's OK, and you can indicate so here. However, a bug is always more likely to get looked at and fixed when there's a clear way of triggering the problematic behavior. Today, I'm working on Odp files and the bug happened 3 times : 1. Adding a slide 2. Making a tool visible in a toolbar 3. no idea of the circonstances Each time I had to quit every LibreOffice module to free the Unity-dock. I twice tried to provoque the bug again but it did'nt repeat. François -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780962 Title: Conflict with unity dock To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/780962/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 780962] Re: Conflict with unity dock
Le mardi 07 juin 2011 à 19:07 +, Daniel Manrique a écrit : This will help us to find and resolve the problem. If the problem only appears occasionally and you have no clear way of triggering it, it's OK, and you can indicate so here. However, a bug is always more likely to get looked at and fixed when there's a clear way of triggering the problematic behavior. Thanks for your help! ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780962 Title: Conflict with unity dock Hello, I'll try care vhenever the problem appears next time. In my mind it is linked with little windows opened by toolbox. Regards, François -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780962 Title: Conflict with unity dock -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 780962] [NEW] Conflict with unity dock
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libreoffice When masking/unmasking LibreOffice side panel, the unity dock sometimes appears in front of every windows and does not hide until I quit Libroffice. After that, any windows maximisation can hide the dock. If I launch LibreOffice again everything goes well... until next time. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: libreoffice-core 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Wed May 11 09:56:26 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release i386 (20110427.1) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=fr_FR:en LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: libreoffice UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug apport-lpi i386 natty running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780962 Title: Conflict with unity dock -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 780962] Re: Conflict with unity dock
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780962 Title: Conflict with unity dock -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 780962] Re: Conflict with unity dock
I just got the same problem just after clicking the bold option for a word selection. I'm joining a screen capture. ** Attachment added: Unity dock masking a maximised libroffice window https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/780962/+attachment/2124217/+files/libreOffice-unitydock.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780962 Title: Conflict with unity dock -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92660] Re: [apport] ltsp-manager crashed with TypeError in get_videodrivers()
I've got a crash too with an ati x1200 video card and fglrx driver : /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/apt/__init__.py:18: FutureWarning: apt API not stable yet warnings.warn(apt API not stable yet, FutureWarning) Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/ltsp-manager, line 255, in module base.main() File /usr/bin/ltsp-manager, line 251, in main gtk.main() -- [apport] ltsp-manager crashed with TypeError in get_videodrivers() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92660 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 218102] Re: kernel 2.6.24.15 desktop effects fglrx
No more problem with kernel 2.6.24.16 Seems to be closed. -- kernel 2.6.24.15 desktop effects fglrx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218102 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 218102] [NEW] kernel 2.6.24.15 desktop effects fglrx
Public bug reported: I'm using fglrx driver on a hardy beta with an ati X1200 card. When I boot on kernel 2.6.24.15 and trying to enable desktop effects, I get a blanck screen. No problem with kernel 2.6.24.14 and older 13, 12. Here's an extract of Xorg.0.log (not sure it's the good error. (II) fglrx(0): driver needs X.org 7.1.x.y with x.y = 0.0 (WW) fglrx(0): could not detect X server version (query_status=-3) (EE) fglrx(0): atiddxDriScreenInit failed, GPS not been initialized. (WW) fglrx(0): *** (WW) fglrx(0): * DRI initialization failed! * (WW) fglrx(0): * (maybe driver kernel module missing or bad) * (WW) fglrx(0): * 2D acceleraton available (MMIO) * (WW) fglrx(0): * no 3D acceleration available* (WW) fglrx(0): * * ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- kernel 2.6.24.15 desktop effects fglrx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/218102 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 149006] Re: ltsp does not configure xorg.conf correctly
Setting X_COLOR_DEPTH=16 in the lts.conf is sufficient to get X to start (little longer than) fixing an entire xorg.conf). -- ltsp does not configure xorg.conf correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149006 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 149006] Re: ltsp does not configure xorg.conf correctly
I've made a simplest to get the thin client X work : X_MODE_0=1024x768 X_COLOR_DEPTH=24 The only problem with the i810 driver is that it is trying to use 32 bpp color depth. -- ltsp does not configure xorg.conf correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149006 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 149006] Re: ltsp does not configure xorg.conf correctly
I've got the same problem as Hasan with an Intel 82815 video card. the ltsp finds the i810 driver and a worksation install finds intel. I made two custom xorg.conf called in lts.conf (XF86CONFIG_FILE = /etc/X11/xorg-i810.conf or XF86CONFIG_FILE = /etc/X11/xorg-intel.conf). But both are working well. Then I noticed another difference : - in the ltsp-calculated xorg.conf, HorizSync and vertRefresh are defined in the monitor section. - but in the workstation xorg.conf, there is a Display subsection in the Screen section SubSection Display Modes 1024x768 800x600 640x480 EndSubSection It seems that this add make my Xserver work. Could it possible to fix prefered modes in the lts.conf ? -- ltsp does not configure xorg.conf correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149006 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 149006] Re: ltsp does not configure xorg.conf correctly
Sorry, I don't think the problem has something with Display modes. I've got that, following the thin client /var/log/Xorg.1* (EE) I810(0): Given bpp (32) is not supported by i810 driver (EE) Screen(s) found, but none has a usable configuration Is that make us go further ? -- ltsp does not configure xorg.conf correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149006 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 122285] thin-client-manager share screen error
Public bug reported: I ran an Edubuntu server with x11vnc installed in the /opt/ltsp/i386. - Booted up two thin clients. - On the server, I ran thin-client-manager. Works ok. Shows the two clients Desktop in the screen viewer. - I select the second client and click Share screen : the client's 1 desktop is sent to the client 2 (it ought to be the server's desktop). I select the client 1 and click Share screen : the client 1 desktop is sent to himself in an iterative way and fill the entire screen with incrustated title bars ** Affects: thin-client-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- thin-client-manager share screen error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122285 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 122285] Re: thin-client-manager share screen error
I tried the same operation with an ubuntu laptop with ltsp x11vnc with one client. There, the share screen option send effectively the server Desktop to the client's screen. Works well in this case. -- thin-client-manager share screen error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122285 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 92623] Re: gthumb cups printing transparency
Le vendredi 16 mars 2007 à 19:53 +, Pascal De Vuyst a écrit : Which version of Ubuntu are you using? Please provide the output of the printingbug info script for some basic information about your printing setup. I hope this will help. François == System information == Ubuntu Release: 6.10 (edgy) Architecture : i686 Kernel: 2.6.17-11-generic Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_PAPER=fr_FR.UTF-8 /etc/papersize: a4 == Configured printers == DeskJet-3820-imac: HP DeskJet 3820 Foomatic/hpijs (recommended) DeskJet-3820: HP DeskJet 3820 Foomatic/hpijs (recommended) device for DeskJet-3820: usb://HP/DESKJET%203820?serial=CN31N190CZ18 device for DeskJet-3820-imac: ipp://192.168.0.11/printers/DeskJet-3820 == Versions of important printing packages == ii cupsys 1.2.4-2ubuntu3Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - server ii cupsys-driver-gutenprint 5.0.0-2ubuntu2printer drivers for CUPS ii foomatic-db 20060918-0ubuntu2 linuxprinting.org printer support - database ii foomatic-db-engine 3.0.2-20060925-0ubuntu1 linuxprinting.org printer support - programs ii foomatic-db-hpijs20060925-0ubuntu1 linuxprinting.org printer support - database ii foomatic-filters 3.0.2-20060918-0ubuntu1 linuxprinting.org printer support - filters ii gs-common0.3.9ubuntu1 Common files for different Ghostscript relea ii gs-esp 8.15.2.dfsg.0ubuntu1-0ubuntu4 The Ghostscript PostScript interpreter - ESP ii hpijs2.6.9+1.6.9-0ubuntu2 HP Linux Printing and Imaging - gs IJS drive ii hplip1.6.9-0ubuntu2HP Linux Printing and Imaging System (HPLIP) ii libgnomeprint2.2-0 2.12.1-5ubuntu1 The GNOME 2.2 print architecture - runtime f Created with printingbuginfo script v1.3 (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PrintingBugInfoScript) Sat, 17 Mar 2007 17:19:40 +0100 = == System information == Ubuntu Release: 6.10 (edgy) Architecture : i686 Kernel: 2.6.17-11-generic Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_PAPER=fr_FR.UTF-8 /etc/papersize: a4 == Configured printers == DeskJet-3820-imac: HP DeskJet 3820 Foomatic/hpijs (recommended) DeskJet-3820: HP DeskJet 3820 Foomatic/hpijs (recommended) device for DeskJet-3820: usb://HP/DESKJET%203820?serial=CN31N190CZ18 device for DeskJet-3820-imac: ipp://192.168.0.11/printers/DeskJet-3820 == Versions of important printing packages == ii cupsys 1.2.4-2ubuntu3Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - server ii cupsys-driver-gutenprint 5.0.0-2ubuntu2printer drivers for CUPS ii foomatic-db 20060918-0ubuntu2 linuxprinting.org printer support - database ii foomatic-db-engine 3.0.2-20060925-0ubuntu1 linuxprinting.org printer support - programs ii foomatic-db-hpijs20060925-0ubuntu1 linuxprinting.org printer support - database ii foomatic-filters 3.0.2-20060918-0ubuntu1 linuxprinting.org printer support - filters ii gs-common0.3.9ubuntu1 Common files for different Ghostscript relea ii gs-esp 8.15.2.dfsg.0ubuntu1-0ubuntu4 The Ghostscript PostScript interpreter - ESP ii hpijs2.6.9+1.6.9-0ubuntu2 HP Linux Printing and Imaging - gs IJS drive ii hplip1.6.9-0ubuntu2HP Linux Printing and Imaging System (HPLIP) ii libgnomeprint2.2-0 2.12.1-5ubuntu1 The GNOME 2.2 print architecture - runtime f Created with printingbuginfo script v1.3 (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PrintingBugInfoScript) Sat, 17 Mar 2007 17:19:40 +0100 -- gthumb cups printing transparency https://launchpad.net/bugs/92623 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92623] gthumb cups printing transparency
Public bug reported: Printing images with transparency information (png, gif) causes problems : - in gThumb, Gnome image viewer, the image is a black surface, the transparent zone gets white; - in Inkscape, Firefox the image is ok but the transparent zone gets black - Openoffice is able to ignore transparency information : printing is ok. In case of pdf containing transparent image, evince is printing a black rectangle but Adobe reader gets ok. My printer : HP Deskjet 3820 with hpijs pilot. ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- gthumb cups printing transparency https://launchpad.net/bugs/92623 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92623] Re: gthumb cups printing transparency
** Attachment added: image for testing http://librarian.launchpad.net/6836602/troll-petit.png -- gthumb cups printing transparency https://launchpad.net/bugs/92623 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92623] Re: gthumb cups printing transparency
** Attachment added: A second image in gif, also for testing. http://librarian.launchpad.net/6836754/wolf.gif -- gthumb cups printing transparency https://launchpad.net/bugs/92623 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
