[Bug 1688018] Re: DNS server from vpn connection is not being used after network-manager upgrade to 1.2.6
I'm experiencing this issue on Ubuntu 18.04.1. In case this helps anyone, I've been able to fix following https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/OpenVPN#Update_systemd- resolved_script. Only after that change the OpenVPN supplied DNS servers appear on `systemd-resolve --status`. In case that matters, I run `openvpn` from command line -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1688018 Title: DNS server from vpn connection is not being used after network-manager upgrade to 1.2.6 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1688018/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 827861] Re: auto-install/enable does not work properly
Didn't remember this issue. Actually I'm now using full parameter as auto-install/enable=true, and it has been working for a long time now. But if would be glad if at least current preseed documentation mentioned the fact -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/827861 Title: auto-install/enable does not work properly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/827861/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 820306] Re: debconf item apt-setup/security_path not fully honoured
Please apologize for misreading the comment. Once enabled the proposed component boot parameter, with the old the security updates were searched on the right place. I need to manually select a kernel package, but I guess that is unrelated to this bug, which I consider closed (at least for lucid release which I reported and verified now). In case could be useful, I attach the installer syslog. ** Attachment added: syslog.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/base-installer/+bug/820306/+attachment/2299092/+files/syslog.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820306 Title: debconf item apt-setup/security_path not fully honoured To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/base-installer/+bug/820306/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 820306] Re: debconf item apt-setup/security_path not fully honoured
What I have done is to download initrd.gz and linux from wget http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/lucid-proposed/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/ubuntu-installer/amd64 Installing with the new images partially solved the issue. The first access to the security mirror uses the right url /mirror/ubuntu-security/dists/lucid-security/Release But later, after configuring the installed base packages, and at the same time that the installer shows the text Updating the list of available packages, the bad url is attempted again /ubuntu/dists/lucid-security/Release.gpg The installer syslog is attached, and the lines at the top of the sources.list file on the resulting system are verbatim pasted below, where commented lines show the rigt url for standard packages, and the bad one for security # deb http://192.168.40.138/repomirror/ubuntu lucid main restricted # deb http://192.168.40.138/repomirror/ubuntu lucid-updates main restricted # deb http://192.168.40.2/ubuntu lucid-security main restricted # See http://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes for how to upgrade to # newer versions of the distribution. ** Attachment added: Syslog output for installer coming from luci-proposed https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/base-installer/+bug/820306/+attachment/2291408/+files/syslog.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820306 Title: debconf item apt-setup/security_path not fully honoured To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/base-installer/+bug/820306/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 827861] [NEW] auto-install/enable does not work properly
Public bug reported: Using auto=true as boot parameter, raises the question to fill console- setup/codeset, and also requires to specify debian-installer/keymap as boot parameter ** Affects: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/827861 Title: auto-install/enable does not work properly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/827861/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 820306] Re: debconf item apt-setup/security_path not fully honoured
While generating the attached syslog, I've observed that the failure happens while installing the base system. The custom security repository is found later, when installing packages. Also, if needed, I could supply rather complete description about the PXE mirroring setup I'm using. ** Attachment added: Requested installer syslog https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/820306/+attachment/2282083/+files/syslog.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820306 Title: debconf item apt-setup/security_path not fully honoured To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/820306/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 820306] [NEW] debconf item apt-setup/security_path not fully honoured
Public bug reported: I do a 10.04 netinstall whith a preseed file, using local mirrors for the repositories. Security repository is defined with d-i apt-setup/security_host string 192.168.40.2 d-i apt-setup/security_path string /mirror/ubuntu-security And the logs from the apache serving the mirror shows some attempts for http://192.168.40.2/ubuntu. So it looks like that '/ubuntu' is somewhere hardcoded in the installer. When doing the same for lenny, I use apt-setup/security_host string 192.168.40.2/repomirror/debian-security and works without any issue ** Affects: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820306 Title: debconf item apt-setup/security_path not fully honoured To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/820306/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 229252] Re: [SRU]slapd gssapi failure - apparmor profile doesn't support kerberos gssapi
I've finally performed the test, and I can confirm that the package in hardy-proposed solves this bug, and GSSAPI authentication to a OpenLDAP server works without problems. -- [SRU]slapd gssapi failure - apparmor profile doesn't support kerberos gssapi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229252 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 229252] Re: [SRU]slapd gssapi failure - apparmor profile doesn't support kerberos gssapi
I've finally performed the test, and I can confirm that the package in hardy-proposed solves this bug, and GSSAPI authentication to a OpenLDAP server works without problems. -- [SRU]slapd gssapi failure - apparmor profile doesn't support kerberos gssapi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229252 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 229252] Re: [SRU]slapd gssapi failure - apparmor profile doesn't support kerberos gssapi
Is there any schedule for including openldap-2.4.10-3ubuntu1 into hardy? I would like to test that the patch does actually works. I've tried to install the binary package and compile the source one, but both fail due to missing dependencies (libltdl7) or versions. -- [SRU]slapd gssapi failure - apparmor profile doesn't support kerberos gssapi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229252 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 229252] Re: [SRU]slapd gssapi failure - apparmor profile doesn't support kerberos gssapi
Is there any schedule for including openldap-2.4.10-3ubuntu1 into hardy? I would like to test that the patch does actually works. I've tried to install the binary package and compile the source one, but both fail due to missing dependencies (libltdl7) or versions. -- [SRU]slapd gssapi failure - apparmor profile doesn't support kerberos gssapi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229252 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 255117] [NEW] Domain name not well guessed
Public bug reported: I've installed a new ubuntu 8.04 desktop, from alternate CD in a W2K environment. The only issue found during install was that I need to retry DHCP to get addresses. After installing, while configuring kerberos and finding some problems I did realize that there was a trailing dot in the output of dnsdomainname, which actually came from the contents of /etc/hosts. ** Affects: base-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Domain name not well guessed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255117 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 231727] Re: installer clean existing /boot partition
So can I assume that ubuntu-8.04.1-alternate-amd64.iso is not affected or that at least there will be a unaffected release 8.04-2 alternate at some point in the (near) future. -- installer clean existing /boot partition https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231727 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 231727] Re: installer clean existing /boot partition
You're right, its 8.04. As every distribution uses it's own tags for kernels, is quite difficult to get conflicts with kernel/initrd, and with grub the last one prevails. If the erasing is intentional, I think it should not delete lost+found, and it should be warned somewhere. Not only you will loose any chance to boot other distros, but in my case I did lose some data, as I use the boot partition to share home directory of the user I want to share among distros. I'm quite sure that I did install previous ubuntu versions on systems with other linux distributions installed, and it didn't erase anything, and made a very good job detecting them and even adding them to grub menu. -- installer clean existing /boot partition https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231727 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 231727] [NEW] installer clean existing /boot partition
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: base-installer I'm using the alternate install CD, to install on a system with a previous Linux install (fedora 9). Both installs share a common /boot partition, and have a separate disk partition for /. If I install fedora first, when I install ubuntu the contents of the /boot partition gets cleaned. I'm prety sure that it is not reformated because the lost+found directory does not exists after install. ** Affects: base-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- installer clean existing /boot partition https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231727 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 231727] Re: installer clean existing /boot partition
The problem is with ubuntu 8.10. -- installer clean existing /boot partition https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231727 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 231728] [NEW] installer fails detecting Vista reinstall partitions
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: base-installer I'm installing ubuntu with 8.10 alternate CD. After installation, it shows as usual the grub entry for the eixisting Vista partition, but also for the system partition intended to reinstall vista. ** Affects: base-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- installer fails detecting Vista reinstall partitions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231728 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 231727] Re: installer clean existing /boot partition
This might be related to bug 38168, but I'm quite sure that I didn't have this problems in the past reusing an existing /home partition. -- installer clean existing /boot partition https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231727 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 229252] [NEW] slapd gssapi failure
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: slapd I'm setting up a ldap server allowing gssapi (kerberos) authentication, and it looks like the slapd daemon does not work properly. I've tried with both sasl-gssapi flavours (MIT heimdal), and both fail when the slapd is running on the ubuntu (hardy) box, but works properly when the slapd is on a debian (etch) box. The behaviour (described below) is the same when I supply the proper KRB5_KTNAME on /etc/default/slapd and when no keytab is supplied there, so it looks like the environment variable is not honoured. When using the Heimdal-GSSAPI library, I get ldap_sasl_interactive_bind_s: Invalid credentials (49) MIT-GSSAPI library gives ldap_sasl_interactive_bind_s: Other (e.g., implementation specific) error (80) and on the credential cache I see two ticket for a ldap principal one with the realm and another one that looks like realm-less. There is also a quite probably related syslog message (selinux disabled, keytab owned by openldap user): kernel: [ 783.797967] audit(1210511590.180:11): type=1503 operation=inode_permission requested_mask=::a denied_mask=::a name=/dev/tty pid=7408 profile=/usr/sbin/slapd namespace=default ** Affects: openldap2.2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- slapd gssapi failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229252 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 229058] [NEW] hdb schema missing
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: heimdal-kdc The hardy package for heimdal KDC does not ship the hdb schema to use the ldap backend. The ldap backend is actually compiled, but the line 84 on rules file, which actually installs hdb.schema is commented. The debian bug related to the inclusion of this file is 355287 (closed) ** Affects: heimdal (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- hdb schema missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229058 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
