[Bug 1054732] Re: [LENOVO 4298R86] suspend/resume failure

2015-03-16 Thread pamindic
On 14.10 and this bug is still there.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054732

Title:
  [LENOVO 4298R86] suspend/resume failure

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1054732/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 995829] Re: xpdf segmentation fault

2012-07-04 Thread pamindic
Got the same problem. Evince has stopped working too.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/995829

Title:
  xpdf segmentation fault

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xpdf/+bug/995829/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 317728] Re: iwl3945: no space for tx, Error sending REPLY_LEDS_CMD: iwl3945_enqueue_hcmd failed: -28

2010-08-27 Thread pamindic
 Iwl3945 on Thinkpad Z61m and same wireless dropout problem. The
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=quiet splash radeon.modeset=0 noplymouth
workaround has now sorted it.

-- 
iwl3945: no space for tx, Error sending REPLY_LEDS_CMD: iwl3945_enqueue_hcmd 
failed: -28 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317728
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 576255] Re: can't install apache2.2-common (2.2.14-5ubuntu8)

2010-08-23 Thread pamindic
Adam Conrad - This isn't apache-specific, though it seems that apache
users seem to be one of the larger groups of people who think that
deleting conffiles will improve their lives somehow. Not really sure how
to curb that, but not with bugs in apache.

You won't curb it by making sarky comments. If it works for a handful of
congnoscenti like your goodself, but fails for the great unwashed, then
it probably isn't very usefully organised. No-one's asking for 'bugs in
apache'. It seems to me reasonable enough to  be able to dump the config
files and expect a reinstall to reload them load them with the binaries.

-- 
can't install apache2.2-common (2.2.14-5ubuntu8)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576255
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 576255] Re: can't install apache2.2-common (2.2.14-5ubuntu8)

2010-08-23 Thread pamindic
Adam Conrad - This isn't apache-specific, though it seems that apache
users seem to be one of the larger groups of people who think that
deleting conffiles will improve their lives somehow. Not really sure how
to curb that, but not with bugs in apache.

You won't curb it by making sarky comments. If it works for a handful of
congnoscenti like your goodself, but fails for the great unwashed, then
it probably isn't very usefully organised. No-one's asking for 'bugs in
apache'. It seems to me reasonable enough to  be able to dump the config
files and expect a reinstall to reload them load them with the binaries.

-- 
can't install apache2.2-common (2.2.14-5ubuntu8)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576255
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 546917] Re: fglrx fails to install in lucid

2010-04-25 Thread pamindic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 552782 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552782

Eric Hough's workaround worked for me. The second two lines did nothing,
and I had to do it a couple of times.

-- 
fglrx fails to install in lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546917
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 562919] [NEW] Lucid Beta2: Desktop Crash, then Unable to Boot

2010-04-14 Thread pamindic
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: samba

Lucid desktop dies. Requires hard boot. That produces a flashing cursor in top 
left hand corner and dies.
Recovery mode kernel output is:

Slow work  thread path: starting up
Slow work  thread path: ready
CIFS VFS: Error connecting to socket: aborting operation
CIFS VFS: cifs-mount failed w/return code  = -101

If I chroot from live CD and comment out mount cifs lines from fstab,
machine boots normally.

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Lucid Beta2: Desktop Crash, then Unable to Boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562919
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 562919] [NEW] Lucid Beta2: Desktop Crash, then Unable to Boot

2010-04-14 Thread pamindic
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: samba

Lucid desktop dies. Requires hard boot. That produces a flashing cursor in top 
left hand corner and dies.
Recovery mode kernel output is:

Slow work  thread path: starting up
Slow work  thread path: ready
CIFS VFS: Error connecting to socket: aborting operation
CIFS VFS: cifs-mount failed w/return code  = -101

If I chroot from live CD and comment out mount cifs lines from fstab,
machine boots normally.

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Lucid Beta2: Desktop Crash, then Unable to Boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562919
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 545211] Re: No root file system is defined. Please correct this from the partitioning menu.

2010-04-11 Thread pamindic
I've experienced this. At the desktop after loading Lucid live CD, I
take the 'Install Ubuntu 10.04' option. I have a single hard disk whose
single partition registers as /dev/sda1. It's formatted to ext4, but
otherwise blank.  After language, timezone and keyboard options, I get a
partitioning screen called 'Prepare Partitions', but the content is
blank, i.e. it doesn't offer the drive for partitioning. If I choose to
go Forward anyway, I get the error message:

No root file system is defined. Please correct this from the
partitioning menu'.

-- 
No root file system is defined.  Please correct this from the partitioning menu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545211
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 545211] Re: No root file system is defined. Please correct this from the partitioning menu.

2010-04-11 Thread pamindic
I've found my problem by installing the Alternate CD. The drive was
registering as part of a software raid set-up, although it wasn't being
used in a raid arrangement and hadn't been for several years. The
Alternate CD picked this up and overcame it, but the Live CD didn't trap
it. So at least I can say there's an inconsistency between the graphical
and text installers!

-- 
No root file system is defined.  Please correct this from the partitioning menu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545211
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 472468] Re: cups-pdf and cups-insecure-filter print error on cups 1.4.1

2010-03-18 Thread pamindic
I've done as suggested above but am still experiencing this problem.

-- 
cups-pdf  and cups-insecure-filter print error on cups 1.4.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/472468
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 158185] Re: brasero won't burn with gstreamer0.10-fluendo-mp3 installed

2009-12-13 Thread pamindic
I've still got this problem

-- 
brasero won't burn with gstreamer0.10-fluendo-mp3 installed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158185
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 459859] Re: 'cannot yet be mounted', 'waiting for /dev/sda1'

2009-11-15 Thread pamindic
re OK, I found the solution

I don't think this has anything to do with whether the UUID or /dev/sd??
is used in fstab to identify the drive. Nor in my case does disabling
drive checking by zeroing out fstab column 6 (last digit). It stops
checking alright, but I still  finish up with a  read-only drive and
need to remount it read/write with mount -o remount,rw /dev/sda1,
then exit to bring up an X session. This needs fixing.

-- 
'cannot yet be mounted', 'waiting for /dev/sda1'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459859
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 456274] Re: mountall 0.2.5 and cryptsetup fail to boot when using usplash

2009-11-02 Thread pamindic
I have a similar experience to Geostar1024 (#25)

At the boot splash (white logo/black background) I get:

 One or more of the mounts listed in /etc/fstab cannot yet be mounted:
 /: waiting for /dev/disk/by-uuid/uuid_of_my_partition_sda1
 /tmp: waiting for (null)
: waiting for
Press ESC to enter recovery shell

ESC gives a root prompt and a mounted partition sda1 but mounted read-only.
If I change that with:

mount -o remount,rw /dev/sda1

I can then type 'exit' and I finally get a gnome desktop as normal.

Each time I re-boot, though, I have to go through the same process.

I tried altering /boot/menu/menu.lst to remove 'splash' from the kernel
line (as suggested above) but it made no difference. (I had to do this
because ESC wasn't giving me a grub menu).

I think this is related to encryption, which I'd put on a .Private subdirectory 
in ~/. I experienced
problems and attempted to uninstall it; something may be left over. I don't get 
asked at boot for any passphrase.

-- 
mountall 0.2.5 and cryptsetup fail to boot when using usplash
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456274
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 427439] Re: [52.118558] ath5k phy0: noise floor calibration timeout (2412MHz)

2009-09-20 Thread pamindic
Does this issue remain with the more recent Karmic Alpha 6 release -
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/karmic/ .?

Yes it does. I get same repeated error message at console:

ath5k phy0:  noise calibration floor failed (2412MHz)

-- 
[52.118558] ath5k phy0: noise floor calibration timeout (2412MHz)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427439
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 362421] [NEW] Users vanish from User Settings after changes made to /etc/passwd

2009-04-16 Thread pamindic
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gnome-system-tools

This may be related in some sense to 115957, reported as fixed. After
manually changing a users's UID in /etc/passwd and his group in
/etc/group, the user disappears from the Gnome User Settings applet. The
user still exists on the system, and the applet objects that they exist
if you try to recreate that user. A re-boot makes no difference - the
user remains absent from the applet (Intrepid), and it seems to be
permanent.

** Affects: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Users vanish from User Settings after changes made to /etc/passwd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362421
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 175090] Re: OpenOffice.org Calc: bug cells reference when using R1C1

2009-01-02 Thread pamindic
This bug remains active in OOCalc 3.0, if not for the simple example used 
above, then certainly for more complex
formulae.It seems to me to be associated with subtraction of a cell in a 
formula, as changing the (-) sign in front of the cell reference to a (+) sign 
eliminates the problem.

-- 
OpenOffice.org Calc: bug cells reference when using R1C1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/175090
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 175090] Re: OpenOffice.org Calc: bug cells reference when using R1C1

2009-01-02 Thread pamindic
Further to my post above, a workaround seems to be to put the subtracted
cell at the start of the formula. That doesn't help, of course, if your
formula has two or more subtracted cells!

-- 
OpenOffice.org Calc: bug cells reference when using R1C1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/175090
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 234841] Re: xsane crashes x-windows [hp 7490c]

2008-12-29 Thread pamindic
This problem is the same as  Bug Report #134754.
Anyone made any progress with it?

-- 
xsane crashes x-windows [hp 7490c]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234841
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 243665] Re: f-spot dont like to display images

2008-12-14 Thread pamindic
I am experiencing the same problem with Intrepid. The images, which
remain in the original import directory rather than being physically
imported to a file structure of F-Spot's making, show in the browser
window, but they won't open; instead F-Spot shows a substitute icon with
a red cross. If there is a permissions issue, I can't see what it is.

-- 
f-spot dont like to display images
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243665
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 134754] Re: hp scanjet 4200C crashes (x)sane

2008-12-13 Thread pamindic
I have the same problem with an HP 5370C scanner.  Sane-find-scanner  reports:
found USB scanner (vendor=0x03f0 [Hewlett Packard], product=0x0701 [Hewlett 
Packard ScanJet 5300C/5370C ]) at libusb:004:006
and scanimage -L  produces either no scanners were identified or, if I 
detach and re-attach the usb cable, I may get device `avision:libusb:004:007' 
is a Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 5370C flatbed scanner.

When scanimage DOES recognise the scanner, Xsane also reports the
scanner present, runs, but there is no scanner activity, Xsane hangs for
a while (at all resolutions) and then bails out of X for a restart.



** Attachment added: ouptut from lsusb
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20407388/lsusb_scanner

-- 
hp scanjet 4200C crashes (x)sane 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134754
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 116798] Re: Kmail does not correctly decrypt base64 message

2008-08-20 Thread pamindic
I think this  may be related. The attached file is a scanned pdf. Such
scans send as attachments without problem  in Evolution, Thunderbird
etc. But in Kontact 3.5.9. they won't leave the Outbox. The following
error message comes up:

Sending failed:
The file or folder The message content was not accepted.
The server responded: Unexpected EOF - closing connection
This is a temporary failure. You may try again later. does not exist.
The message will stay in the 'outbox' folder until you either fix the problem 
(e.g. a broken address) or remove the message from the 'outbox' folder.
The following transport protocol was used:
Xxx Relay

Deleting the file from the Outbox as often as not produce a program
crash.

Kontact automatically detects coding for these pdf files as Base64. I
can't say I really understand what that means, but other files types
seem to send ok.


** Attachment added: 2008_08_18_15_58_46.pdf
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16960008/2008_08_18_15_58_46.pdf

-- 
Kmail does not correctly decrypt base64 message
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116798
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Team, which is subscribed to kdepim in ubuntu.

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 217495] Re: Password authetication failure - Hardy

2008-06-08 Thread pamindic
Mika,

Thanks for the response. I haven't experienced the problem for some time.
I've just created a directory on  the desktop without problem. All in all - you 
seem to have 
sorted it!

Regards
P Morton

-- 
Password authetication failure - Hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 229223] Re: Find breaks on ~/.gvfs directory

2008-06-08 Thread pamindic
Close it, by all means, but the problem still exists it still exists .  The  
~/.gvfs directory is empty. 
 The command:

find sudo find / -name  '.*something.*'

still denies access for root to the ~/.gvfs directory.
The permissions on the directory are set to user:user
Have your tried it? Others are reporting the same glitch.

-- 
Find breaks on ~/.gvfs directory
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229223
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 229223] Re: Find breaks on ~/.gvfs directory

2008-06-08 Thread pamindic
I can't think what further  information there is to provide!

-- 
Find breaks on ~/.gvfs directory
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229223
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 229223] [NEW] Find breaks on ~/.gvfs directory

2008-05-11 Thread pamindic
Public bug reported:

When running find in a particular way there is an error reading the
~/.gvfs directory and find bombs.

sudo find / -name '.*something.*'

produces:

find: /home/myboxoftricks/.gvfs: Permission denied

The problem:

* doesn't happen without the sudo
* doesn't happen without the -name
* doesn't happen when ~/.gvfs isn't on the search path


so basically when .gvfs in on the search path, and you use sudo and the name 
switch, find bombs.

Same problem is being reported with other distros.  It seems to be a Gnome 
glitch.
Not good that root's file access is denied.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Find breaks on ~/.gvfs directory
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229223
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 174214] Re: [Hardy] xserver-xorg can't generate configuration file

2008-04-25 Thread pamindic
No, it's not the answer at all. Even if it were, X is needed to run it,
and X is what I haven't got.  I.e. there's a hole in my bucket. The
result is a dead machine, and no way of fixing it. The avenue of last
resort for the chronic and vexing problem of fixing X for troublesome
display configurations has just been sealed off in Ubuntu.  Is this bug
really still of 'undecided' importance?

-- 
[Hardy] xserver-xorg can't generate configuration file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174214
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 217495] [NEW] Password authetication failure - Hardy

2008-04-14 Thread pamindic
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: bash

Su and sudo  produce  authentication failure' errors for valid
passwords, but not consistently. I've now experienced it on two separate
machines. I have other odd symptoms.  I can't right click create a
directory on a user's gnome desktop. I get the error Error while
creating directory untitled folder. There was an error creating the
directory in /home/userx/Desktop. More details shows error removing
file: Permission denied. I have also experience root and user as root
being unable to modify users' files.

** Affects: bash (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Summary changed:

- Authetication failure - Hardy
+ Password authetication failure - Hardy

-- 
Password authetication failure - Hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217495
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 26198] Re: Nautilus Thumbnail creation freeze system

2007-11-13 Thread pamindic
I have a related problem with a folder containing 240 sub-folders and
2800 tiff files of around 50MB each. Opening the folder is slowish,
about 10 seconds. I was able to open the subfolders until I started
using one of the tiff files for an icon. I did that with 3 of the 240
sub-folders, and then Nautilus started crashing each time I tried to
enter a sub-folder.

-- 
Nautilus Thumbnail creation freeze system
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/26198
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 156860] Re: f-spot crashes on tif file import

2007-11-04 Thread pamindic
I can confirm this bug. Importing tif files created by a Nikon Coolscan
5000 produces the error message Input String was not in correct
format. I get it for all tif files I try to import.

-- 
f-spot crashes on tif file import
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/156860
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 156860] Re: f-spot crashes on tif file import

2007-11-04 Thread pamindic
F-sport doesn't crash, though, it just won't import the files.

-- 
f-spot crashes on tif file import
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/156860
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 156860] Re: f-spot crashes on tif file import

2007-11-04 Thread pamindic
Just tried importing a random 5MB tif from net, and it imports fine.
Wonder if the size of my tifs are a problem - they're 50MB (thought the
error message doesn't seem to suggest that).

-- 
f-spot crashes on tif file import
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/156860
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 5741] Re: Another problem with mac keyboard

2007-04-12 Thread pamindic
Feisty has fixed the Ctrl-Alt-Fn problem. But the Mac keyboard is not
entirely correctly mapped. There is no 'hash' character, which is a
distinct drawback for commenting out lines of text in config files, And
the key to the left of Z, which shows tilda and back-quote (whatever the
proper name for that is!) produces  and , which are duplicated as they
are already produced by the same shift keys as the PC105 keyboard.

There is also a key to the left of the number 1 which shows a paragraph
mark character normally and +/- character in shift. That produces 'back-
quote' and tilda respectively, which would more sensibly be mapped to
the key to the left of the Z which is marked appropriately. This  cries
out for the hash to be assigned to the +/-, leaving the paragraph mark
to sit in for that hockey stick shift character next to the 1 on a
PC105.

Apart from the three  volume control keys and a special arrow key above
the numpad, which produce a pretty graphic but don't otherwise do
anything, the keyboard  works well. In fact, after 5 minutes I've taken
to it over my many cherished Cherries  (sorry Cherry!).

-- 
Another problem with mac keyboard
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/5741
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 95704] Re: configuring raid during installation failes

2007-03-31 Thread pamindic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 84228 ***

Marcw's workaround  does the job, but isn't helpful if you've already
got arrays set up that you want to delete. You are unable to do so
unless you go into a terminal (Alt-F2) and set up a set of symbolic
links ln -s /dev/mdx /dev/md/x where x is the number(s)  of the
array(s)  you've already made. Return to installer (Alt-F1) and continue
with deleting the arrays, which will now work.

Next problem is that you can't pair up the newly released partitions
into new MD arrays. But following Marcw's workaround  and tracing your
steps from the reboot back to the Raid Option, you find your raid arrays
ready to assign mount points. You can then complete the install.

Disappointingly for me though, after an apparently successful
installation - even that 10 minute brltty-x11 file install wait that
looks like its died (perhaps the  braille terminal could be a post-
install option?) eventually revives - booting from hard disk  failed
with the Busybox error message /bin/sh: can't access tty; job control
turned off.

Since I've already loaded Herd 5 on a raidless system, I can only assume
this is another raid-related problem. I think there are a lot of issues
with the software raid setup that need to be addressed before final
release.

-- 
configuring raid during installation failes
https://launchpad.net/bugs/95704

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 95704] Re: configuring raid during installation failes

2007-03-25 Thread pamindic
I have much the same problem. Set up 4 pairs of raid partitions. After
'configure raid' get the error message could not stat device /dev/md/4
(sic!) - No such file or directory.  A re-boot gives message that md
partitions are in safe mode.  The installer has a bug.

-- 
configuring raid during installation failes
https://launchpad.net/bugs/95704

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs