[Bug 1270203] Re: no way to use resizepart non-interactively on busy partition
It still affects me on Ubuntu Focal Fossa 20.04 using parted 3.3, using @Sunil Mohan Adapa (f-su7il-g)#6 workaround does work however the upstream bug report seems to suggest its intentional? https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-parted/2020-01/msg5.html In Ubuntu 19.10 using parted 3.2 this command used to work without interaction and without the -s/--script arguments: parted /dev/sdX resizepart 2 y 100% -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1270203 Title: no way to use resizepart non-interactively on busy partition To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/parted/+bug/1270203/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1862262] Re: [snap] apparmor denials on /sys/devices/virtual/dmi/id/sys_vendor and product_name
Also affected here, with alot more messages from audit: type=1400 apparmor="DENIED" operation="mknod / open / unlink / truncate / dbus_method_call etc..." [ 7817.510475] audit: type=1400 audit(1582191723.992:6264): apparmor="DENIED" operation="truncate" profile="snap.chromium.chromium" name="/home/username/snap/chromium/1026/.config/chromium/Default/Favicons-journal" pid=4639 comm="Chrome_HistoryT" requested_mask="w" denied_mask="w" fsuid=1000 ouid=1000 [ 7825.615310] audit: type=1400 audit(1582191732.100:6278): apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" profile="snap.chromium.chromium" name=2F686F6D652F756174702F736E61702F6368726F6D69756D2F313032362F2E636F6E6669672F6368726F6D69756D2F44656661756C742F43757272656E742053657373696F6E pid=4639 comm="ThreadPoolForeg" requested_mask="wc" denied_mask="wc" fsuid=1000 ouid=1000 [ 7827.273968] audit: type=1400 audit(1582191733.756:6281): apparmor="DENIED" operation="mknod" profile="snap.chromium.chromium" name="/home/username/snap/chromium/1026/.config/chromium/.org.chromium.Chromium.mrO80f" pid=4639 comm="ThreadPoolForeg" requested_mask="c" denied_mask="c" fsuid=1000 ouid=1000 [ 8365.423097] audit: type=1400 audit(1582192271.910:7069): apparmor="DENIED" operation="unlink" profile="snap.chromium.chromium" name="/home/username/snap/chromium/1026/.config/chromium/SingletonLock" pid=4639 comm="chrome" requested_mask="d" denied_mask="d" fsuid=1000 ouid=1000 [ 8417.535810] audit: type=1107 audit(1582192324.023:7286): pid=1299 uid=103 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 msg='apparmor="DENIED" operation="dbus_method_call" bus="system" path="/" interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.ObjectManager" member="GetManagedObjects" mask="send" name="org.bluez" pid=11273 label="snap.chromium.chromium" $ snap list Name Version Rev Tracking Publisher Notes chromium 80.0.3987.1161036 stablecanonical✓ - $ uname -a Linux lacol 5.3.0-40-generic #32-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jan 31 20:24:34 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 19.10 Release:19.10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862262 Title: [snap] apparmor denials on /sys/devices/virtual/dmi/id/sys_vendor and product_name To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1862262/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1396379] Re: installer uses first EFI system partition found even when directed otherwise
This still affects me on ubuntu-mate 19.10 amd64 also while selecting the option "erase disk" which only prompts you to select a "single disk" on which ubuntu will be installed even false summarizing that no other disks/partitions will be altered which is a lie! This happens in both UEFI and legacy bios mode installs. With the Legacy BIOS install the damage could be worse since it will destroy MBR tables of any earlier SDA disk on which GRUB will install the bootloader resembling the old "Microsoft Windows XP installer" on which you'd better physically unplug any other disk on which you don't want the OS install to run. Searching for a launchpad bugreport for the legacy part anyone? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1396379 Title: installer uses first EFI system partition found even when directed otherwise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1396379/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1481832] Re: VA-API implementation for gallium missing
In reaction to Robert Hooker about performance. Did some benchmarks with "mpv" and 1080i h264 transport stream footage trying all three possible acc. backends on [Radeon HD 6320]. *vdpau (native) *Splitted-Desktop Systems VDPAU backend for VA-API *mesa gallium vaapi All of them seem to perform equally maybe some 1-5% difference. Maybe because there isn't real 'vdpau' on AMD so its implementation of vdpau is like the other VAAPI ones using the same optimize tricks (combination of hardwaredecoder/shaders/etc/gpu offload)? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1481832 Title: VA-API implementation for gallium missing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1481832/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1487558] [NEW] Sync kodi 15.1+dfsg1-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main)
Public bug reported: Please sync kodi 15.1+dfsg1-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main) Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped: * Build with -gnu89-inline. *Just a sync request for including kodi 15.1 stable in Ubuntu Wily 15.10 after feature/debianimport freeze date of 08-20-2015. PS also include updated kodi PVR addons https://github.com/kodi-pvr instead the old 13.x xbmc ones. Changelog entries since current wily version 14.2+dfsg1-2ubuntu1: kodi (15.1+dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release 15.0 See http://www.kodi.tv/kodi-15-0-isengard-one-release-to-rule-them-all/ * Depend on libav.*-dev provided by src:ffmpeg * Recommend udisks2 instead of udisks. Udisks has been removed from unstable but support for udisks2 is not implemented yet. * Ship patch helping Jessie backports * Refresh patches * Eliminate __DATE__ macros from source to make build more reproducible * Build-depend on libsdl2.*-dev instead of libsdl.*-dev * Build-depend on libgif-dev * Drop obsoleted fix of installed header's include paths * Refresh include file list included by kodi-addons-dev * Build depend on libcec (= 3) * Build-depend on groovy2 instead of groovy * Sort build dependencies * Fix packaging repository URL * Remove removed files from debian/copyright * Fix filenames with spaces in debian/copyright * Ship TexturePacker in kodi-addons-dev in /usr/lib/kodi * Build depend on libcec-platform-dev * Stop using embedded gnulib modules in rsxs screensaver (Closes: #795813) * Add missing copyright paragraphs to d/copyright * Stop marking files as excluded which are removed from upstream tarball already * Bump standards version to 3.9.6 * New upstream release 15.1 See http://kodi.tv/kodi-15-1-isengard-maintenance-release/ * Move TexturePacker to kodi-bin * Stop building TexturePacker statically -- Balint Reczey bal...@balintreczey.hu Tue, 18 Aug 2015 14:16:59 +0200 ** Affects: kodi (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1487558 Title: Sync kodi 15.1+dfsg1-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kodi/+bug/1487558/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1481832] [NEW] VA-API implementation for gallium missing
Public bug reported: [needs-packaging] libva-mesa-driver / gallium_drv_video.so Please include gallium_drv_video.so which is a native va-api state tracker for mesa(gallium). URL: http://mesa3d.sourceforge.net/ URL: http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/vaapi/ #intel/vdpau License: http://www.mesa3d.org/license.html Notes: Currently (as of today) in ubuntu 15.10 nightly amd64, va-api(vaapi) on AMD/Ati radeon opensource display hardware is using a vdpau backend 0.7.4 by Splitted-Desktop Systems (wrapper) on gallium r600. Although its possible and probably preferred (better performance less copying) to use a native implementation which mesa(gallium) 10.4 and higher delivers in a form of a va-api state tracker. vainfo #current default setup vdpau backend libva info: VA-API version 0.38.0 libva info: va_getDriverName() returns 0 libva info: Trying to open /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/r600_drv_video.so libva info: Found init function __vaDriverInit_0_37 libva info: va_openDriver() returns 0 vainfo: VA-API version: 0.38 (libva 1.6.0) vainfo: Driver version: Splitted-Desktop Systems VDPAU backend for VA-API - 0.7.4 vainfo: Supported profile and entrypoints VAProfileMPEG2Simple: VAEntrypointVLD VAProfileMPEG2Main : VAEntrypointVLD VAProfileMPEG4Simple: VAEntrypointVLD VAProfileMPEG4AdvancedSimple: VAEntrypointVLD VAProfileH264Baseline : VAEntrypointVLD VAProfileH264Main : VAEntrypointVLD VAProfileH264High : VAEntrypointVLD VAProfileVC1Advanced: VAEntrypointVLD The preferred setup needs that gallium_drv_video.so binary which is currently unavailable in ubuntu and debian. As an example I added a package/binary from archlinux. Copying the gallium_drv_video.so to /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/ and symlinking(correcting) the libLLVM-3.6.so to arch-linux default /usr/lib/ location and exporting a variable was enough to make it work! https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/libva-mesa-driver/ #example by archlinux export LIBVA_DRIVER_NAME=gallium vainfo #preferred setup using gallium va-api from arch-linux (symlinked libLLVM-3.6.so to /usr/lib) libva info: VA-API version 0.38.0 libva info: va_getDriverName() returns 0 libva info: User requested driver 'gallium' libva info: Trying to open /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/gallium_drv_video.so libva info: Found init function __vaDriverInit_0_38 libva info: va_openDriver() returns 0 vainfo: VA-API version: 0.38 (libva 1.6.0) vainfo: Driver version: mesa gallium vaapi vainfo: Supported profile and entrypoints VAProfileMPEG2Simple: VAEntrypointVLD VAProfileMPEG2Main : VAEntrypointVLD VAProfileMPEG4Simple: VAEntrypointVLD VAProfileMPEG4AdvancedSimple: VAEntrypointVLD VAProfileVC1Advanced: VAEntrypointVLD VAProfileH264Baseline : VAEntrypointVLD VAProfileH264Main : VAEntrypointVLD VAProfileH264High : VAEntrypointVLD I guess this binary gallium_drv_video.so might be available as a compile flag in the current mesa implementation... intel and vdpau has their own current implementation in va-api maybe http://cgit.freedesktop.org/vaapi/libva/ ? ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1481832 Title: VA-API implementation for gallium missing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1481832/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1481832] Re: VA-API implementation for gallium missing
** Description changed: - [needs-packaging] libva-mesa-driver / gallium_drv_video.so + [needs-packaging] mesa Please include gallium_drv_video.so which is a native va-api state tracker for mesa(gallium). URL: http://mesa3d.sourceforge.net/ URL: http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/vaapi/ #intel/vdpau License: http://www.mesa3d.org/license.html Notes: Currently (as of today) in ubuntu 15.10 nightly amd64, va-api(vaapi) on AMD/Ati radeon opensource display hardware is using a vdpau backend 0.7.4 by Splitted-Desktop Systems (wrapper) on gallium r600. Although its possible and probably preferred (better performance less copying) to use a native implementation which mesa(gallium) 10.4 and higher delivers in a form of a va-api state tracker. vainfo #current default setup vdpau backend libva info: VA-API version 0.38.0 libva info: va_getDriverName() returns 0 libva info: Trying to open /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/r600_drv_video.so libva info: Found init function __vaDriverInit_0_37 libva info: va_openDriver() returns 0 vainfo: VA-API version: 0.38 (libva 1.6.0) vainfo: Driver version: Splitted-Desktop Systems VDPAU backend for VA-API - 0.7.4 vainfo: Supported profile and entrypoints - VAProfileMPEG2Simple: VAEntrypointVLD - VAProfileMPEG2Main : VAEntrypointVLD - VAProfileMPEG4Simple: VAEntrypointVLD - VAProfileMPEG4AdvancedSimple: VAEntrypointVLD - VAProfileH264Baseline : VAEntrypointVLD - VAProfileH264Main : VAEntrypointVLD - VAProfileH264High : VAEntrypointVLD - VAProfileVC1Advanced: VAEntrypointVLD + VAProfileMPEG2Simple: VAEntrypointVLD + VAProfileMPEG2Main : VAEntrypointVLD + VAProfileMPEG4Simple: VAEntrypointVLD + VAProfileMPEG4AdvancedSimple: VAEntrypointVLD + VAProfileH264Baseline : VAEntrypointVLD + VAProfileH264Main : VAEntrypointVLD + VAProfileH264High : VAEntrypointVLD + VAProfileVC1Advanced: VAEntrypointVLD The preferred setup needs that gallium_drv_video.so binary which is currently unavailable in ubuntu and debian. As an example I added a package/binary from archlinux. Copying the gallium_drv_video.so to /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/ and symlinking(correcting) the libLLVM-3.6.so to arch-linux default /usr/lib/ location and exporting a variable was enough to make it work! https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/libva-mesa-driver/ #example by archlinux export LIBVA_DRIVER_NAME=gallium vainfo #preferred setup using gallium va-api from arch-linux (symlinked libLLVM-3.6.so to /usr/lib) libva info: VA-API version 0.38.0 libva info: va_getDriverName() returns 0 libva info: User requested driver 'gallium' libva info: Trying to open /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/gallium_drv_video.so libva info: Found init function __vaDriverInit_0_38 libva info: va_openDriver() returns 0 vainfo: VA-API version: 0.38 (libva 1.6.0) vainfo: Driver version: mesa gallium vaapi vainfo: Supported profile and entrypoints - VAProfileMPEG2Simple: VAEntrypointVLD - VAProfileMPEG2Main : VAEntrypointVLD - VAProfileMPEG4Simple: VAEntrypointVLD - VAProfileMPEG4AdvancedSimple: VAEntrypointVLD - VAProfileVC1Advanced: VAEntrypointVLD - VAProfileH264Baseline : VAEntrypointVLD - VAProfileH264Main : VAEntrypointVLD - VAProfileH264High : VAEntrypointVLD + VAProfileMPEG2Simple: VAEntrypointVLD + VAProfileMPEG2Main : VAEntrypointVLD + VAProfileMPEG4Simple: VAEntrypointVLD + VAProfileMPEG4AdvancedSimple: VAEntrypointVLD + VAProfileVC1Advanced: VAEntrypointVLD + VAProfileH264Baseline : VAEntrypointVLD + VAProfileH264Main : VAEntrypointVLD + VAProfileH264High : VAEntrypointVLD I guess this binary gallium_drv_video.so might be available as a compile flag in the current mesa implementation... intel and vdpau has - their own current implementation in va-api maybe + their own current implementation in a separate libva branch http://cgit.freedesktop.org/vaapi/libva/ ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1481832 Title: VA-API implementation for gallium missing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1481832/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[Bug 976751] Re: Graphical bug, Nautilus right click menu, rename option greyed out
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 973491 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/973491 ** Tags added: grey nautilus -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/976751 Title: Graphical bug, Nautilus right click menu, rename option greyed out To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/976751/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 937088] Re: Gosmore hangs on startup
** Tags added: gosmore -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/937088 Title: Gosmore hangs on startup To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gosmore/+bug/937088/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 986064] [NEW] FATAL: Module ndiswrapper not found, configuration already contains alias directive 12.04
Public bug reported: The program ndisgtk with its related packages install without a problem/error. But as soon as loading a windows *.inf driver file in the ndisgtk program it show the following popup message: Module could not be loaded. Error was: FATAL: Module ndiswrapper not found. Is the ndiswrapper module installed? When trying to modprobe the ndiswrapper module from the terminal it says: FATAL: Module ndiswrapper not found. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: ndiswrapper-common 1.57-1ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-23.36-generic-pae 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-23-generic-pae i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu5 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Apr 20 10:36:13 2012 Dependencies: InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Beta i386 (20120419) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: ndiswrapper UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: ndiswrapper (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 ndiswrapper precise ** Tags added: ndiswrapper -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986064 Title: FATAL: Module ndiswrapper not found, configuration already contains alias directive 12.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ndiswrapper/+bug/986064/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 553782] Re: rfkill shows wrong status of wlan
I cannot test the ndiswrapper on precise 12.04 because of this bug 986064, but in ubuntu 11.10 ndiswrapper did succesfully hard unblock somehow the rfkill state described in comment #7. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553782 Title: rfkill shows wrong status of wlan To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/553782/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 57784] Re: after xrandr desktop icons can go missing
I hate to say it, but this bug is more than 10 YEARS old see: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47943 By using upstream components you get upstream problems, although downstream it also haven't been fixed yet. It still affects us on Ubuntu Precise Pangolin 12.04 LTS. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57784 Title: after xrandr desktop icons can go missing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/57784/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 965431] Re: Desktop icons not fully visible with multiple monitors of different vertical resolution
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 360970 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/360970 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 360970 Multi-monitor - When using two displays with different vertical resolution, icons get lost on the shorter display -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/965431 Title: Desktop icons not fully visible with multiple monitors of different vertical resolution To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/965431/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 553782] Re: rfkill shows wrong status of wlan
** Also affects: linux via http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15679 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553782 Title: rfkill shows wrong status of wlan To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/553782/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 553782] Re: rfkill shows wrong status of wlan
When the Ndiswrapper with the Ralink proprietary Windows Driver is used after removing the active module rt2500usb the device works (ofcourse using NDIS). But when removing the ndiswrapper and its module, and modprobing the rt2500usb again rfkill will show soft and hard unblocked. Continuing that when doing: sudo ifconfig wlan0 up sudo service network-manager stop/start The device connects and functions fine with the rt2500usb driver, also shown in the connection info box of network-manager applet. It really doesn't use the ndis because there are no ndis modules loaded. So the kernel driver works fine, but there really is problem getting the right hard blocked state. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553782 Title: rfkill shows wrong status of wlan To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/553782/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 920650] Re: windows smoothly and slowly lag behind mouse cursor when using multiple monitors
Compiz 0.9.7.6 regression? duplicate bug 982263 Opensource and Closed drivers affected on both ATI/AMD, Nvidia and Intel. Suspend login logout also affected! Like Eduards Bezverhijs mentioned in post 6 this bug has really partly been fixed even on the multimonitor setup with high screen resolutions (I was really amazed to see that it finally worked!) but it also regressed back on the update of compiz 0.9.7.6. a couple of days ago. So somewhere between the first big compiz upgrade of 12.04 LTS in january or februari this was really fixed and performance was snappy and smooth even on a netbook with multimonitor, only after wake from suspend these former versions are also affected but logging out and login again fixed it. I can confirm that this buggy behavior is not in compiz 0.9.7.2/4 version (suspend excluded) but on these version and the new compiz 0.9.7.6. after suspend especially the regressed compiz 0.9.7.6 (logout/login doesn't help in this version) becomes incredibly slow. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/920650 Title: windows smoothly and slowly lag behind mouse cursor when using multiple monitors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz-core/+bug/920650/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 553782] Re: rfkill shows wrong status of wlan
Reopen Bug, more info! Having exactly the same PC Desktop model from Medion, I can confirm this bug is still in Ubuntu Precise Pangolin 12.04 LTS as its probably a kernel related issue from kernel 2.6.32 up to 3.2.x or upstream 3.4. I will try to continue the contact with upstream kernel bugzilla as Peter did. The hardware does functions fine under ubuntu 9.10 with 2.6.31 like Peter mentions, although its soft blocked by rfkill, but doing rfkill unblock all wifi the wifi hardware works fine. Possible fix in missing module? Like mentioned by Peter in newer versions of ubuntu with kernel 2.6.32up rfkill notes hard blocked instead of soft blocked, but there is something else thats different. Ubuntu 9.10 shows the module input-polldev as loaded and used by rt2x00lib and I googled that its used by rfkill. rt2500usb 21152 0 rt2x00usb 11548 1 rt2500usb rt2x00lib 29756 2 rt2500usb,rt2x00usb led_class 4096 1 rt2x00lib input_polldev 3716 1 rt2x00lib mac80211 181140 2 rt2x00usb,rt2x00lib cfg80211 93052 2 rt2x00lib,mac80211 The newer version of ubuntu/kernel don't use the module input_polldev, maybe input_polldev read or forced a good state of software/hardware block or it is indeed a hardware bug(wifi device itself reporting the wrong status), but I still like to know a way to work around it. On the desktop machine there is no hardware button to control the wifi adapter. I might only try windows with a driver from ralink itself instead of the OEM medion. But alot of people already mention that NDISwrapper works fine... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553782 Title: rfkill shows wrong status of wlan To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/553782/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 553782] Re: rfkill shows wrong status of wlan
** Tags removed: needs-upstream-testing ** Tags added: precise ralink rfkill rt2500usb ** Description changed: Rfkill list shows the rt2500usb as Hard blocked and rfkill unblock wifi does therefore not unblock. But there is no switch on my pc or in the BIOS to switch it on/off. In the previous kernel image linux- image-2.6.31-20-generic it was Soft blocked on startup which in my opinion is wrong, too. But at least I was able to switch it to unblocked by rfkill. ProblemType: Bug - DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 + DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 12.04 Package: linux-image-2.6.32-19-generic 2.6.32-19.28 Regression: Yes Reproducible: Yes ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-19.28-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-19-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.21. Architecture: i386 AudioDevicesInUse: - USERPID ACCESS COMMAND - /dev/snd/controlC1: peter 1539 F pulseaudio - /dev/snd/controlC0: peter 1539 F pulseaudio + USERPID ACCESS COMMAND + /dev/snd/controlC1: peter 1539 F pulseaudio + /dev/snd/controlC0: peter 1539 F pulseaudio Card0.Amixer.info: - Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xd810 irq 16' -Mixer name : 'C-Media CMI9880' -Components : 'HDA:434d4980,70911462,00090402' -Controls : 21 -Simple ctrls : 12 + Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xd810 irq 16' + Mixer name : 'C-Media CMI9880' + Components : 'HDA:434d4980,70911462,00090402' + Controls : 21 + Simple ctrls : 12 Card1.Amixer.info: - Card hw:1 'SAA7134'/'saa7134[0] at 0xd800 irq 17' -Mixer name : 'SAA7134 Mixer' -Components : '' -Controls : 6 -Simple ctrls : 3 + Card hw:1 'SAA7134'/'saa7134[0] at 0xd800 irq 17' + Mixer name : 'SAA7134 Mixer' + Components : '' + Controls : 6 + Simple ctrls : 3 Date: Fri Apr 2 06:26:24 2010 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=2465e27b-5800-4b90-8d1a-540d0ea3bbe0 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release i386 (20091028.5) MachineType: MEDIONPC MS-7091 ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-19-generic root=UUID=c524743b-aed7-4cd6-87e9-92091ec75609 ro quiet splash ProcEnviron: - LANG=de_DE.utf8 - SHELL=/bin/bash + LANG=de_DE.utf8 + SHELL=/bin/bash RelatedPackageVersions: linux-firmware 1.33 SourcePackage: linux dmi.bios.date: 10/28/2004 dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies, LTD dmi.bios.version: 6.00 PG dmi.board.name: MS-7091 dmi.board.vendor: MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologies,LTD:bvr6.00PG:bd10/28/2004:svnMEDIONPC:pnMS-7091:pvr:rvnMICRO-STARINTERNATIONALCO.,LTD:rnMS-7091:rvr:cvn:ct3:cvr: dmi.product.name: MS-7091 dmi.sys.vendor: MEDIONPC ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Opinion ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Opinion = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553782 Title: rfkill shows wrong status of wlan To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/553782/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 982263] Re: unity window resize / movement extreme slow multimonitor
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 920650 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/920650 Update, in the compiz config settings manager OpenGL: enable the checkbox sync to vblank makes the performance a bit better but still not as snappy as before! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/982263 Title: unity window resize / movement extreme slow multimonitor To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/982263/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 982263] Re: unity window resize / movement extreme slow multimonitor
Regression? I can confirm that a multimonitor setup on a netbook with ATI/AMD HD6250 and the opensource display driver with Ubuntu 12.04 LTS AMD64(not fully updated) with the package compiz 0.9.7.4 does NOT show this slow/delayed window movement resize behaviour! Unless logout and login back to the desktop can make it react slower and sluggish again. A daily live ISO of ubuntu AMD 12.04 LTS also doesn't show this behaviour with compiz 0.9.7.2. The package unity in all of them was of version 5.8.0-0ubuntu2. ** Tags added: delayed placement -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/982263 Title: unity window resize / movement extreme slow multimonitor To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/982263/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 982263] Re: unity window resize / movement extreme slow multimonitor
The problem is probably a regression in compiz 0.9.7.6? ** Description changed: - Symptome/Occurance: - This slow window resize/movement behaviour will not occur when logged into a lxde or gnome(classis) session on the same machine. But in a unity or unity-2d session, apps like Nautilus, pcmanfm or firefox or chromium-browser the bigger these application windows get, the harder they seem to move or resize especcially on a multimonitor setup it becomes incredibly slow. + Symptom/Occurance: + This slow window resize/movement behaviour will not occur when logged into a lxde or gnome(classis) session on the same machine. But in a unity or unity-2d session, apps like Nautilus, pcmanfm or firefox or chromium-browser the bigger these application windows get, the harder they seem to move or resize especially on a multimonitor setup it becomes incredibly slow. - Affected manufacters: - After some googling and looking at youtube movies and other ubuntu releases with unity I see it doesn't matter which video manufacture is used al be it Nvidia, Intel or AMD/ATI, but in case of using the ATi frglx driver it can be worse than it is already now, but some tweaks in CompizSettingsmanager like quality, vsync, refreshrate will improve incase of the fgrlx BUT NOT in this scennario in which I'm writing the bug report for. + Affected manufacturers: + After some googling and looking at youtube movies and other ubuntu releases with unity I see it doesn't matter which video manufacture is used al be it Nvidia, Intel or AMD/ATI closed or opensource driver, but in case of using the ATi frglx driver it can be worse than it is already now, but some tweaks in CompizSettingsmanager like quality, vsync, refreshrate will improve the performace BUT NOT in this scenario in which I'm writing the bug report for. Packages: - I cannot say if it is unity or compiz, both of them or something else. But other desktop sessions do not seem to be affected. Unless I run LXDE and start unity or unity-2d-schell on top of it, than it becomes as slow and sluggih as unity(2d) itself. + I cannot say if it is unity or compiz, both of them or something else. But other desktop sessions do not seem to be affected. Unless I run LXDE and start unity or unity-2d-shell on top of it, than it becomes as slow and sluggish as unity(2d) itself. Regression? - Im running a test setup from the beginning of 12.04 LTS and this annoying behaviour has been there from the beginning, until a month ago it seems to be fixed. Running on a multimonitor setup with opensource driver reacted and responded incredibly snappy, even until compiz 0.9.7.4 update last week but, after the update of compiz 0.9.7.6 this weekend it was back sluggish and slow again. I will try to figure it out more exactly. + I'm running a test setup from the beginning of 12.04 LTS and this annoying behavior has been there from the beginning, until a month ago it seems to be fixed. Running on a multimonitor setup with opensource driver reacted and responded incredibly snappy, even until compiz 0.9.7.4 update last week but, after the update of compiz 0.9.7.6 this weekend it was back sluggish and slow again. I will try to figure it out more exactly. Possible Fix? - I do have a daily live iso image of ubuntu 12.04 LTS but don't know from which day, but it doesn't show this SLOW/buggy behaviour until you logout and login again back to its default live session and than performance becomes slow again. + I do have a daily live iso image of ubuntu 12.04 LTS but don't know from which day, but it doesn't show this SLOW/buggy behavior until you logout and login again back to its default live session and than performance becomes slow again. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: unity 5.10.0-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-23.36-generic 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-23-generic x86_64 .tmp.unity.support.test.0: - + ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: [core,composite,opengl,decor,imgpng,unitymtgrabhandles,place,workarounds,session,grid,expo,gnomecompat,compiztoolbox,resize,scale,vpswitch,mousepoll,ezoom,regex,move,wall,unityshell] CompositorRunning: compiz CurrentDmesg: - [ 38.505673] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready - [ 49.504007] eth0: no IPv6 routers present - [ 1262.164016] usb 1-5: reset high-speed USB device number 3 using ehci_hcd + [ 38.505673] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready + [ 49.504007] eth0: no IPv6 routers present + [ 1262.164016] usb 1-5: reset high-speed USB device number 3 using ehci_hcd Date: Sun Apr 15 13:15:26 2012 DistUpgraded: Fresh install DistroCodename: precise DistroVariant: ubuntu DkmsStatus: - virtualbox, 4.1.12, 3.2.0-21-generic, x86_64: installed - virtualbox, 4.1.12, 3.2.0-22-generic, x86_64: installed - virtualbox, 4.1.12, 3.2.0-23-generic, x86_64: installed + virtualbox, 4.1.12,
[Bug 982263] Re: unity window resize / movement extreme slow multimonitor
IanWilson are you using opensource Nouveau or closed binary Nvidia Driver? Do you also happen to have a older ubuntu precise iso image laying around with an older compiz version which did work? Can you also confirm on a other desktop environment/session on the same system like lxde or something else like gnome-shell /gnome-session- fallback that doesn't use compiz? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/982263 Title: unity window resize / movement extreme slow multimonitor To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/982263/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 982263] [NEW] unity window resize / movement extreme slow multimonitor
Public bug reported: Symptome/Occurance: This slow window resize/movement behaviour will not occur when logged into a lxde or gnome(classis) session on the same machine. But in a unity or unity-2d session, apps like Nautilus, pcmanfm or firefox or chromium-browser the bigger these application windows get, the harder they seem to move or resize especcially on a multimonitor setup it becomes incredibly slow. Affected manufacters: After some googling and looking at youtube movies and other ubuntu releases with unity I see it doesn't matter which video manufacture is used al be it Nvidia, Intel or AMD/ATI, but in case of using the ATi frglx driver it can be worse than it is already now, but some tweaks in CompizSettingsmanager like quality, vsync, refreshrate will improve incase of the fgrlx BUT NOT in this scennario in which I'm writing the bug report for. Packages: I cannot say if it is unity or compiz, both of them or something else. But other desktop sessions do not seem to be affected. Unless I run LXDE and start unity or unity-2d-schell on top of it, than it becomes as slow and sluggih as unity(2d) itself. Regression? Im running a test setup from the beginning of 12.04 LTS and this annoying behaviour has been there from the beginning, until a month ago it seems to be fixed. Running on a multimonitor setup with opensource driver reacted and responded incredibly snappy, even until compiz 0.9.7.4 update last week but, after the update of compiz 0.9.7.6 this weekend it was back sluggish and slow again. I will try to figure it out more exactly. Possible Fix? I do have a daily live iso image of ubuntu 12.04 LTS but don't know from which day, but it doesn't show this SLOW/buggy behaviour until you logout and login again back to its default live session and than performance becomes slow again. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: unity 5.10.0-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-23.36-generic 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-23-generic x86_64 .tmp.unity.support.test.0: ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: [core,composite,opengl,decor,imgpng,unitymtgrabhandles,place,workarounds,session,grid,expo,gnomecompat,compiztoolbox,resize,scale,vpswitch,mousepoll,ezoom,regex,move,wall,unityshell] CompositorRunning: compiz CurrentDmesg: [ 38.505673] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready [ 49.504007] eth0: no IPv6 routers present [ 1262.164016] usb 1-5: reset high-speed USB device number 3 using ehci_hcd Date: Sun Apr 15 13:15:26 2012 DistUpgraded: Fresh install DistroCodename: precise DistroVariant: ubuntu DkmsStatus: virtualbox, 4.1.12, 3.2.0-21-generic, x86_64: installed virtualbox, 4.1.12, 3.2.0-22-generic, x86_64: installed virtualbox, 4.1.12, 3.2.0-23-generic, x86_64: installed GraphicsCard: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] nee ATI RV630 [Radeon HD 2600XT] [1002:9588] (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:01c4] MachineType: System manufacturer P5K-E ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-23-generic root=UUID=1ba52055-30cd-4f0b-bd47-83ebf7135b66 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 SourcePackage: unity UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 09/08/2008 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: 1202 dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.board.name: P5K-E dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC. dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890 dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr1202:bd09/08/2008:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnP5K-E:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rnP5K-E:rvrRev1.xx:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion: dmi.product.name: P5K-E dmi.product.version: System Version dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.7.6-0ubuntu1 version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs N/A version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.32-1ubuntu1 version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 8.0.2-0ubuntu3 version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 8.0.2-0ubuntu3 version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.11.4-0ubuntu10 version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.7.0-0ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.14.99~git20111219.aacbd629-0ubuntu2 version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.17.0-1ubuntu4 version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:0.0.16+git20111201+b5534a1-1build2 ** Affects: unity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 compiz-0.9 movement multimonitor precise resize slow window -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/982263 Title: unity window resize / movement extreme slow multimonitor To manage
[Bug 982263] Re: unity window resize / movement extreme slow multimonitor
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/982263 Title: unity window resize / movement extreme slow multimonitor To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/982263/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 919139] Re: window management, multi-monitor - In multi-monitor environment, windows should spread on the monitor in which they reside
As of today with all updates and compiz 0.9.7.6 the spread/maximize/enlarge on a multimonitor setup with each screen having a different resolution is still broken in the following way. It will always enlarge/spread/maximize to the biggest screen although the window position and the maximize action was initiated from the smaller screen, in the condition that the window that is subjected to enlarging has a vertical and or horizontal resolution that is larger than the resolution of the smaller screen! Eventhough the orange opacity grid (related to the maximize/enlarge/spread activity) lifts up on the first smaller screen where it was initiated but the window it self appears on the other second larger screen maximized. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919139 Title: window management, multi-monitor - In multi-monitor environment, windows should spread on the monitor in which they reside To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/919139/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 930660] Re: with multiple monitors, applications appear on the wrong monitor
As of today with all the updates on 12.04 amd64 with AMD/ATI H2600xt with galium3d, I was able to partly fix this strange Window focus / popup behaviour under the following conditions: It only works on windows that original(or after alterning) have a smaller vertical and or horizontal resolution than the smallest screen resolution you use in your multimontior setup(otherwise it defaults to the largest screen another spread bug 919139) and you need to edit the following parameter in ccsm(compiz-config-settingsmanager) therefor it will also place new windows on the screen on which the pointer exist(that pointer option also works right now)! CCSMGeneralDisplay Settings: Overlapping Output handling=Prefer smaller output After this option the Place Window plugin finally listens to further settings. CCSMPlace WindowsGeneral: Placement mode=centered (just in case) Multi output mode=Use output device with pointer After this all popup / new (dialog) windows/applications like chromiumbrowserprinting, or OpenofficePDF outputnautiluspopup come on the screen where the pointer is postitioned. This makes it finnaly usable! !!!But still if a program like Blender opens it default jumps to the biggest screen, since it opening state is the resolution of both of the multimonitor screens together!!! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930660 Title: with multiple monitors, applications appear on the wrong monitor To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/930660/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 874146] Re: Unexpected window placement in multimonitor multi virtual desktop environment
It related to window placement popup/focus is it? I think you need to have multimonitor setup with atleast two screens having different resolutions to notice this bug. In my case to popup focus or open Windows on the screen that I'm bussy with I need to change some ccsm settings and each window that I want to behave in my favoured way. See settings from this bug fix: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/930660/comments/10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874146 Title: Unexpected window placement in multimonitor multi virtual desktop environment To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/874146/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 975222] Re: ath3k bluetooth adapter cannot load firmware
I can confirm this fix works for the following device: ID 0cf3:3005 Atheros Communications, Inc. AR3011 Bluetooth, Trust usb 3.0 mini usb adapter After re-installing the removed 1.1.2-2 version of libmtp-runtime by its updated 1.1.3.1 version by just updating/upgrading from the default precise repository, the adapter works fine! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/975222 Title: ath3k bluetooth adapter cannot load firmware To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libmtp/+bug/975222/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 714862] Re: Atheros AR3011 cannot be turned up/is not recognized.
I can confirm the fix from #54 from bug 975222 (updated libmtp-runtime) works for the following device: ID 0cf3:3005 Atheros Communications, Inc. AR3011 Bluetooth, Trust usb 3.0 mini usb adapter So after re-installing the removed 1.1.2-2 version of libmtp-runtime by its updated 1.1.3.1 version by just updating/upgrading from the default precise repository, the adapter works fine! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/714862 Title: Atheros AR3011 cannot be turned up/is not recognized. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/714862/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 945257] Re: freeze hang boot broadcom b43 wifi firmware 12.04 i686 amd64
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 956677 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956677 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 956677 Live CD boot fails, b43 error -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945257 Title: freeze hang boot broadcom b43 wifi firmware 12.04 i686 amd64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/945257/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 945257] Re: freeze hang boot broadcom b43 wifi firmware 12.04 i686 amd64
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 956677 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956677 I stumbled on bug 956677 which is on a different architecture PPC vs (x86/amd64), but has the same effect of the problem (freeze/hang) with same hardware chipset of the wifi board being involved. I'm not sure if the package casper is the problem but that bug atleast has been confirmed so I marked this bug as a duplicate of 956677. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945257 Title: freeze hang boot broadcom b43 wifi firmware 12.04 i686 amd64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/945257/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 945257] Re: freeze hang boot broadcom b43 wifi firmware 12.04 i686 amd64
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 956677 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956677 Booting with the option b43.blacklist=true reported in bug 956677, boots the machine to the Desktop without any problems. I think I also found another duplicate bug 972823. Still this firmware missing thing didn't was a problem on earlier versions of Ubuntu but was always in the logs, causing no problems... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945257 Title: freeze hang boot broadcom b43 wifi firmware 12.04 i686 amd64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/945257/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 972823] Re: Precise Beta 2 Live CD hangs at boot on HP Pavilion zv6000
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 956677 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956677 Can you try booting with the following kernel boot parameter: b43.blacklist=true If this works this might be a duplicate of bug 956677, which has been confirmed but no cause have been found yet(also see bug 945257). Don't know if the b43 kernel team package is the problem or a other related package on top of it mentioned in this thread. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 956677 Live CD boot fails, b43 error -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/972823 Title: Precise Beta 2 Live CD hangs at boot on HP Pavilion zv6000 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/972823/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 945257] [NEW] freeze hang boot broadcom b43 wifi firmware 12.04 i686 amd64
Public bug reported: Software: In multiple pre-releases of Ubuntu 12.04 alpha / beta, i686 or amd64 edition, the system will freeze/hang during boot. When booting without the following kernel parameters quit splash you see as the last message that the firmware of the broadcom wifi adapter is not available at that moment it already freezes. I suspect that it has to do with network initialization of the desktop environment since the system boots and installs fine with the alternate installer of the 12.04 series, than after a minimal/core install I must install the package firmware-b43-installer before I can install a full desktop environment like Ubuntu desktop. Previous versions of Ubuntu back to 10.04 just worked fine! Hardware: Asus p5kwifi e wifi/ap PCI Asus wl138v2 HD2600XT ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: b43 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945257 Title: freeze hang boot broadcom b43 wifi firmware 12.04 i686 amd64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/945257/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 578910] Re: Brasero burning ISO dvd-rw fail please eject manually
As of this DATE 2010-07-25 on LinuxMint9 amd64 also updated kernels as of ubuntu version, mint doesn't do that it seems partly fixed. Writing a iso file to a 700mb nashua CDR works without a problem, it even ejects the drive. The checksum of the written CD is also fine. BTW also eject from Apple Aluminium keyboard is also fixed, at 10.04 it ejected USB deviced not the CD/DVD drive as in 9.10 Writing a DVDRW still gives the same eject error, but doing a checksum of the DVDRW shows it has been burned correctly. I will try ubuntu 10.04 i386 again in near future to update this bug report. -- Brasero burning ISO dvd-rw fail please eject manually https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578910 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 578910] Re: Brasero burning ISO dvd-rw fail please eject manually
** Description changed: Binary package hint: brasero Ubuntu 10.04 i386, LITE-ON DVDRW LH-20A1S Nashua DVD-RW 4,7GB media Burning an ISO file from the Nautilus context menu right mouse button on ISO file Write to Disc... which opens Brasero does not produce a working DISC. As extra options Properties I choose the lowest speed and the max speed and I tried disabling use burn proof. At the Lowest burning speed brasero comes up in the end with this message window. Please eject the disc from LITE-ON DVDRW LH-20A1S manually. The disc could not be ejected thought it needs to be removed for the current operation to continue. The resulting burned DVD does not work does not boot by BIOS and does not show up its contents etc in Nautilus it shows up as a empty writable disc ready to add new content for writing. When the Max Speed is selected it does not produce the eject manually window, it ejects the disc in the end, but it also leaves me with a unusable DVD like in the first situation. When use burnproof is not selected it doesn't even start writing the disc. Workaround / Solution: I can burn the ISO from terminal without any real problems, only the label does not show, but it boots by my BIOS and Nautilus does show it contents after writing. Terminal: cdrecord -scanbus #look at CD/DVD burner device location nr cdrecord -v -dao dev=3,0,0 Downloads/lubuntu-10.04.iso #my device nr was 3,0,0 + Burning a *.iso file to a Nashua CD-R 700MB with brassero, does work + at the 16x speed maybe also higher, it finalizes, it ejects and when + making an image the checksum is successful, there are no error messages. + Check: Doing a md5sum from the DVD-RW does show that it has been burned successfully sudo dd if=/dev/cdrw of=image.iso md5sum image.iso Downloads/lubuntu-10.04.iso 386a227968cbabc89e1a23b95035160e image.iso 386a227968cbabc89e1a23b95035160e Downloads/lubuntu-10.04.iso ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: brasero 2.30.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Tue May 11 19:38:41 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429) ProcEnviron: - LANG=en_US.UTF-8 - SHELL=/bin/bash + LANG=en_US.UTF-8 + SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: brasero + brasero error log is empty... -- Brasero burning ISO dvd-rw fail please eject manually https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578910 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 578910] Re: Brasero burning ISO dvd-rw fail please eject manually
Lucky LIX Can you write the a iso to DVD with the terminal?: cdrecord -scanbus #look at CD/DVD burner device location nr cdrecord -v -dao dev=3,0,0 Downloads/lubuntu-10.04.iso #my device nr was 3,0,0 -- Brasero burning ISO dvd-rw fail please eject manually https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578910 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 578910] [NEW] Brasero burning ISO dvd-rw fail please eject manually
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: brasero Ubuntu 10.04 i386, LITE-ON DVDRW LH-20A1S Nashua DVD-RW 4,7GB media Burning an ISO file from the Nautilus context menu right mouse button on ISO file Write to Disc... which opens Brasero does not produce a working DISC. As extra options Properties I choose the lowest speed and the max speed and I tried disabling use burn proof. At the Lowest burning speed brasero comes up in the end with this message window. Please eject the disc from LITE-ON DVDRW LH-20A1S manually. The disc could not be ejected thought it needs to be removed for the current operation to continue. The resulting burned DVD does not work does not boot by BIOS and does not show up its contents etc in Nautilus it shows up as a empty writable disc ready to add new content for writing. When the Max Speed is selected it does not produce the eject manually window, it ejects the disc in the end, but it also leaves me with a unusable DVD like in the first situation. When use burnproof is not selected it doesn't even start writing the disc. Workaround / Solution: I can burn the ISO from terminal without any real problems, only the label does not show, but it boots by my BIOS and Nautilus does show it contents after writing. Terminal: cdrecord -scanbus #look at CD/DVD burner device location nr cdrecord -v -dao dev=3,0,0 Downloads/lubuntu-10.04.iso #my device nr was 3,0,0 Check: Doing a md5sum from the DVD-RW does show that it has been burned successfully sudo dd if=/dev/cdrw of=image.iso md5sum image.iso Downloads/lubuntu-10.04.iso 386a227968cbabc89e1a23b95035160e image.iso 386a227968cbabc89e1a23b95035160e Downloads/lubuntu-10.04.iso ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: brasero 2.30.0-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Tue May 11 19:38:41 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429) ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: brasero ** Affects: brasero (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- Brasero burning ISO dvd-rw fail please eject manually https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578910 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 578910] Re: Brasero burning ISO dvd-rw fail please eject manually
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48284853/Dependencies.txt -- Brasero burning ISO dvd-rw fail please eject manually https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578910 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 409575] Re: told ubiquity to install grub to sda6, but it breaks grub on mbr
fixed indeed in Lucid Lynx 10.04 i386! It installs the grub2 bootloader to the selected partition without killing the current bootloader/in the 'mbr' on the first disk. -- told ubiquity to install grub to sda6, but it breaks grub on mbr https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 409575] Re: told ubiquity to install grub to sda6, but it breaks grub on mbr
Another Update! old post 2: I will try a manually install to external usb disk and see if it still breaks the mbr of the internal disk... keep ya updated! I did it and just finished 2 test installs on a external memory-stick. One affected the mbr on my internal /dev/sda the other install did nothing to the mbr on /dev/sda. I found out why! swap partition: My internal first harddisk /dev/sda also contains a swap partition, during install of ubuntu to external memory stick /dev/sdf, it also selects the swap partition on my internal harddisk for swap. As this is automatically done during the manual partitioning of the installation, I consider this as another serious BUG! because I never asked for it! When I manually deselect the swap volume on /dev/sda and continue installation and manually select the mbr/grub install for /dev/sdf everything works. Booting from internal hd still works and booting from external memory stick after deselecting the swap on /dev/sda! last and I will try one install with automatic partitioning just to the external memory stick for the last test, If that one also screws the mbr on my internal disc than there is a serious bug somewhere -- told ubiquity to install grub to sda6, but it breaks grub on mbr https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 409575] Re: told ubiquity to install grub to sda6, but it breaks grub on mbr
Another another update! last and I will try one install with automatic partitioning just to the external memory stick for the last test, If that one also screws the mbr on my internal disc than there is a serious bug somewhere I did and when using the automatic partition option use entire disk on a external usb disk, the mbr on the first internal harddisk still gets broken! This time I did not manual select where to install mbr/grub in the advanced option, because the summary page says that only the following disks and partions are altered and it did not contain sda!!! Therefore the summary page cannot be trusted and therefore the option use entire disk is still misleading. I'll try to recover the mbr because right now grub installed itself to it instead of partition... I backed up 512 bytes to be sure! Maybe I'll do one more install again to check if the entire disk option with manually selecting the mbr/grub install in the advanced options will work. Should I make several new bug reports of the strange conditions I discovered, because not all is I think in the scope of this bugpost, but they all share screwing the mbr on the first disk. But this can be done in several ways we know by now. -- told ubiquity to install grub to sda6, but it breaks grub on mbr https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 409575] Re: told ubiquity to install grub to sda6, but it breaks grub on mbr
I fixed my mbr this time by restoring the whole 512 bytes, because ubuntu installed it to the mbr on /dev/sda instead of /dev/sdf... I tried one more install with automated partitioning using use entire disk on a external usb disk. This time with manually selecting to install the mbr/grub in /dev/sdf instead of hd0 at the advanced options box on page 7 of the installer. This time the installation when fine, the internal disk is untouched and still boots fine, and the external usb disk is created fine and boots correctly. Summary to all my posts above 1 Ubuntu installer behaves like a Windows xp installer which is in my opinion not good! 2 The mbr of the first disk will be overwritten if anything needs to happen to the first disk! 2a if /dev/sda will contain a already created swapfs partition, the ubuntu manual partition installer will use it if you won't deselect it! So if you don't change anything on the first disk, but only use its swapfs than mbr gets broken! 2b if any other filesystems are recreated/reformated on /dev/sda the mbr gets also broken! 2c if you are installing ubuntu to a external disk, even if you used the use entire disk it will break the mbr unless you manually select to put mbr/grub in the advanced options box to the right disk on the last page of the installer! 3 Ubuntu summary at page 7 of the install is missleading and wrong! The following devices etc etc will get changed/touched, if your installing to a external drive like summary 2c it will still screw your first drive! -- told ubiquity to install grub to sda6, but it breaks grub on mbr https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 409575] Re: told ubiquity to install grub to sda6, but it breaks grub on mbr
This bug can kill allot of dual/multi boot setups! Affected i386/amd64 9.10 releases, 9.04 both releases and maybe also earlier releases... Familiar bug: It is a serious Windows XP like bug, because the Windows XP install always writes itself or overwrites the mbr of the first harddisk even though it is installing on the second or third drive, it doesn't give you the option to choose if the mbr from the first disk must be overwritten! Ubuntu is doing the same dangerous thing even though you are able to choose where to install the mbr/grub... it works half! https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/118612 #same issue for automated usb stick install in 9.04! Install: When booting from the livecd and install ubuntu to a other drive than the first /dev/sda like usb stick /dev/sdf you can change the location of grub install in the summmary screen which is good, and press advanced and set grub to install to a different drive or partion... I prefer grub partition install instead of drive install. This step is half-broken! Suggestion, always in stall grub in partion and leave mbr alone only set boot flag The first stage of grub seems to be written to mbr of the first disk /dev/sda, and the last stages end up on the usb drive or similar /dev/sdf. So when doing a reboot after install, neither system on /dev/sda or /dev/sdf will boot anymore! So leaving a broken setup. Fix/workaround: Before pressing the install ubuntu 9.10 shorcut on the desktop of the live-cd, go to terminal: sudo dd if=/dev/sda of=mbrbackup.440 bs=440 count=1 After Ubuntu install has finished DONT PRESS RESTART, but press continue testing and go to the terminal again: sudo dd if=/mbrbackup.440 of=/dev/sda bs=440 count=1 This keeps the internal install on /dev/sda working. The usb stick install will still be broken. Info: Bootloader: Chameleon-2.0-RC3-r658 Partition layout GUID, performed with Mac OS 10.5 diskutility 4 partitions made with Mac OS 10.5 diskutility fat32 EFI hidden always created HFSplus Mac OSX install fat32 ext4fs / fat32 ext4fs /home fat32 swapfs During ubuntu install I manually reformated the fat32 filesystems to the needed ubuntu filesystems. This might also screw the mbr, I will test later today. The fat32 ext4fs partiton for the mbr/grub install is selected in the summary screen for my internal ubuntu install. After the install I notice the bootloader is broken. But my described fix/workaround fixes this! If I install grub to /dev/sda by accident than my WHOLE system will not boot anymore, maybe I need to backup the first 512 bytes of the disc to recover from this disaster but... if you already have a bootloader in the mbr, than you will install grub to the ubuntu partion instead of mbr. lshw info: *-disk description: ATA Disk product: Maxtor 6B250S0 vendor: Maxtor physical id: 0 bus info: s...@0:0.0.0 logical name: /dev/sda version: BANC serial: B61R0K3H size: 233GiB (251GB) capabilities: gpt-1.00 partitioned partitioned:gpt configuration: ansiversion=5 guid=0265eb53-7918-45a1-bbbc-94ee1a156813 *-volume:0 description: Windows FAT volume vendor: BSD 4.4 physical id: 1 bus info: s...@0:0.0.0,1 logical name: /dev/sda1 version: FAT32 serial: 3f3c-1af6 size: 199MiB capacity: 199MiB capabilities: boot fat initialized configuration: FATs=2 filesystem=fat label=EFI name=EFI System Partition *-volume:1 description: Apple HFS partition vendor: Mac OS X (journaled) physical id: 2 bus info: s...@0:0.0.0,2 logical name: /dev/sda2 version: 4 serial: 2a6f6565-ba29-236d--0040 size: 128GiB capabilities: journaled bootable osx hfsplus initialized configuration: boot=osx checked=2009-09-11 18:29:13 created=2009-09-11 09:29:13 filesystem=hfsplus lastmountedby=HFSJ modified=2009-11-11 15:32:51 name=Untitled state=clean *-volume:2 description: EXT4 volume vendor: Linux physical id: 3 bus info: s...@0:0.0.0,3 logical name: /dev/sda3 logical name: / version: 1.0 serial: 2887737c-59df-4f37-a08b-b66a998f91b9 size: 14GiB capabilities: journaled extended_attributes large_files huge_files dir_nlink recover extents ext4 ext2 initialized configuration:
[Bug 409575] Re: told ubiquity to install grub to sda6, but it breaks grub on mbr
Today Update! old post: During ubuntu install I manually reformated the fat32 filesystems to the needed ubuntu filesystems. This might also screw the mbr, I will test later today. By re-installing ubuntu 9.10 on /dev/sda and reformating the filesystem and even disabling grub/mbr install in the advanced menu at the summary page of the installer still the first 440 bytes of the mbr gets broken. fixing manually with dd still works! Disabling/uncheckbox mbr/grub install in advanced settings still breaks mbr... I will try a manually install to external usb disk and see if it still breaks the mbr of the internal disk... keep ya updated! -- told ubiquity to install grub to sda6, but it breaks grub on mbr https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217749] Re: External crypto-drives are not automounted after given password
Still not fixed: Ubuntu 9.10 karmic koala i386 pae updated system or on a plain live cd... usb-stick partition layout: mbr part1=fat32 part2=ext4fs /boot part3=encrypted lvm default installer options AES csv-essive etc lvm group lvmvolume1=ext4fs /root lvmvolume2=swapfs Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sdg1 1 243 1951866b W95 FAT32 /dev/sdg2 * 244 274 249007+ 83 Linux /dev/sdg3 275 976 5638815 83 Linux After entering the password for the encrypted volume the mount doesn't work. Maybe manually mounting. To get rid of the annoying popup I disabled automount media in gconf-editor. /apps/nautilus/preferences/media_automount false -- External crypto-drives are not automounted after given password https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217749 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 252343] Re: Suspend to RAM cause ASUS P5K-E/WIFI-AP sata onboard controller malfunction
Asus P5k-e wifi/ap bios 1202, Core2Quad Q6600, ati hd2600xt ubuntu 9.10 beta AMD64:Works! + ati driver from 'hardware and drivers' option It sleeps and wakes fine, even Restart after sleep/wake works at the moment. Also all sata devices connected seem to work. -- Suspend to RAM cause ASUS P5K-E/WIFI-AP sata onboard controller malfunction https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252343 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 349102] Re: [Asus P5K-E] suspend/resume failure
Asus P5k-e wifi/ap bios 1202, Core2Quad Q6600, ati hd2600xt Fixed! ubuntu 9.10 beta AMD64:Works! + ati driver from 'hardware and drivers' option It sleeps and wakes fine, even Restart after sleep/wake works at the moment. -- [Asus P5K-E] suspend/resume failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349102 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 369472] Re: Jockey common crashes when trying to download restricted ATI driver
On my system this is also the case when enabling the broadcom drivers. Sorry, the jockey backend crashed. Please file a bug at: ubuntu-bug jockey-common Trying to recover by restarting backend. I think it has to do that the openwrt website is down, where the firmware is fetched from, so after a couple of retries it hangs! although b43-fwcutter is installed! terminal: dpkg-reconfigure b43-fwcutter #let me download again the firmware -- Jockey common crashes when trying to download restricted ATI driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369472 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 412012] Re: network manager applet, suspend, crash
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30163454/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30163456/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30163458/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: usr_lib_nautilus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30163459/usr_lib_nautilus.txt -- network manager applet, suspend, crash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412012 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 412012] [NEW] network manager applet, suspend, crash
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus Hardware: Asus p5k e wifi/ap bios 1202 ich9r, configured as AHCI CPU Q6600, disabled IEST ATI HD2600XT pci-express SATA HD's SATA DVDR Software: Ubuntu 9.10 amd64 dialy 11-08-09 BeforeSleep: Network / Network manager applet is running fine! After Wake: After waking from sleep suspend from the livecd, I get the error that network manager has generated errors, and when I left click on network manager I see Network Manager is not running. Manual workaround: terminalifconfig eth0 up dhclient eth0 more info: lspci 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 82G33/G31/P35/P31 Express DRAM Controller (rev 02) 00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82G33/G31/P35/P31 Express PCI Express Root Port (rev 02) 00:1a.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #4 (rev 02) 00:1a.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #5 (rev 02) 00:1a.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #6 (rev 02) 00:1a.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller #2 (rev 02) 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) HD Audio Controller (rev 02) 00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) PCI Express Port 1 (rev 02) 00:1c.4 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) PCI Express Port 5 (rev 02) 00:1c.5 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) PCI Express Port 6 (rev 02) 00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #1 (rev 02) 00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #2 (rev 02) 00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #3 (rev 02) 00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller #1 (rev 02) 00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801 PCI Bridge (rev 92) 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82801IR (ICH9R) LPC Interface Controller (rev 02) 00:1f.2 SATA controller: Intel Corporation 82801IR/IO/IH (ICH9R/DO/DH) 6 port SATA AHCI Controller (rev 02) 00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) SMBus Controller (rev 02) 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV630 [Radeon HD 2600XT] 01:00.1 Audio device: ATI Technologies Inc RV630/M76 audio device [Radeon HD 2600 Series] 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8056 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 12) 03:00.0 SATA controller: JMicron Technology Corp. 20360/20363 Serial ATA Controller (rev 03) 03:00.1 IDE interface: JMicron Technology Corp. 20360/20363 Serial ATA Controller (rev 03) 05:02.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4318 [AirForce One 54g] 802.11g Wireless LAN Controller (rev 02) 05:03.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Agere Systems FW322/323 (rev 70) lsusb Bus 007 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 008 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 006 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 001 Device 007: ID 05ac:0221 Apple, Inc. Keyboard (Aluminium) (ISO) Bus 001 Device 006: ID 045e:00d1 Microsoft Corp. Optical Mouse with Tilt Wheel Bus 001 Device 005: ID 05ac:1006 Apple, Inc. Hub in Aluminum Keyboard Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0bda:0151 Realtek Semiconductor Corp. Mass Stroage Device Bus 001 Device 004: ID 0bda:8187 Realtek Semiconductor Corp. RTL8187 Wireless Adapter Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 003 Device 002: ID 0a12:0001 Cambridge Silicon Radio, Ltd Bluetooth Dongle (HCI mode) Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Aug 11 15:28:42 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Alpha amd64 (20090811) Package: nautilus 1:2.27.4-0ubuntu3 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-4.23-generic SourcePackage: nautilus Uname: Linux 2.6.31-4-generic x86_64 ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug -- network manager applet, suspend, crash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412012 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 412012] Re: network manager applet, suspend, crash
Fixed? After installing to harddisk and running all updates/upgrades, the problem seems to be solved! So when waking from sleep the network reconnects and network manager applet doesn't crash. Maybe it was on the live-cd only? ** Description changed: Binary package hint: nautilus Hardware: Asus p5k e wifi/ap bios 1202 ich9r, configured as AHCI CPU Q6600, disabled IEST ATI HD2600XT pci-express SATA HD's SATA DVDR Software: - Ubuntu 9.10 amd64 dialy 11-08-09 + Ubuntu 9.10 amd64 daily 11-08-09 BeforeSleep: Network / Network manager applet is running fine! After Wake: After waking from sleep suspend from the livecd, I get the error that network manager has generated errors, and when I left click on network manager I see Network Manager is not running. Manual workaround: terminalifconfig eth0 up dhclient eth0 more info: lspci 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 82G33/G31/P35/P31 Express DRAM Controller (rev 02) 00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82G33/G31/P35/P31 Express PCI Express Root Port (rev 02) 00:1a.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #4 (rev 02) 00:1a.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #5 (rev 02) 00:1a.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #6 (rev 02) 00:1a.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller #2 (rev 02) 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) HD Audio Controller (rev 02) 00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) PCI Express Port 1 (rev 02) 00:1c.4 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) PCI Express Port 5 (rev 02) 00:1c.5 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) PCI Express Port 6 (rev 02) 00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #1 (rev 02) 00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #2 (rev 02) 00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI Controller #3 (rev 02) 00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller #1 (rev 02) 00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801 PCI Bridge (rev 92) 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82801IR (ICH9R) LPC Interface Controller (rev 02) 00:1f.2 SATA controller: Intel Corporation 82801IR/IO/IH (ICH9R/DO/DH) 6 port SATA AHCI Controller (rev 02) 00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) SMBus Controller (rev 02) 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV630 [Radeon HD 2600XT] 01:00.1 Audio device: ATI Technologies Inc RV630/M76 audio device [Radeon HD 2600 Series] 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8056 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 12) 03:00.0 SATA controller: JMicron Technology Corp. 20360/20363 Serial ATA Controller (rev 03) 03:00.1 IDE interface: JMicron Technology Corp. 20360/20363 Serial ATA Controller (rev 03) 05:02.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4318 [AirForce One 54g] 802.11g Wireless LAN Controller (rev 02) 05:03.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Agere Systems FW322/323 (rev 70) lsusb Bus 007 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 008 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 006 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 001 Device 007: ID 05ac:0221 Apple, Inc. Keyboard (Aluminium) (ISO) Bus 001 Device 006: ID 045e:00d1 Microsoft Corp. Optical Mouse with Tilt Wheel Bus 001 Device 005: ID 05ac:1006 Apple, Inc. Hub in Aluminum Keyboard Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0bda:0151 Realtek Semiconductor Corp. Mass Stroage Device Bus 001 Device 004: ID 0bda:8187 Realtek Semiconductor Corp. RTL8187 Wireless Adapter Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 003 Device 002: ID 0a12:0001 Cambridge Silicon Radio, Ltd Bluetooth Dongle (HCI mode) Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Aug 11 15:28:42 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Alpha amd64 (20090811) Package: nautilus 1:2.27.4-0ubuntu3 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-4.23-generic SourcePackage: nautilus Uname: Linux 2.6.31-4-generic x86_64 -- network manager applet, suspend, crash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412012 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 252343] Re: Suspend to RAM cause ASUS P5K-E/WIFI-AP sata onboard controller malfunction
Asus P5k-e wifi/ap bios 1202, Core2Quad Q6600, ati hd2600xt Ubuntu 9.10 alpha3 i386: Almost WORKS! http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/karmic/alpha-3/karmic-desktop-i386.iso Sleep: When choosing suspend from the live-cd-desktop, the system goes to a normal suspend routine. The harddisks turn down, video display off, sound goes off and finally the powerled goes blinking! Wake: When pressing the power-button to wake, the systems goes on it takes alot of time to get a display back, than it shows a mouse pointer on a black screen. CTRL-ALT-BACKSPACE does nothing, CTRL-ALT F1-F6 hides the mouse pointer but than again no display. I'll try a install later today also AMD 64bit and keep this updated. Ubuntu 9.04 i386: hangs at cursor when going to suspend or hibernate, with or without ati-drivers! have to press reset-button! other os: osx leopard 10.5.7 suspends fine on this hardware, even though it is not supported! -- Suspend to RAM cause ASUS P5K-E/WIFI-AP sata onboard controller malfunction https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252343 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 349102] Re: [Asus P5K-E] suspend/resume failure
Asus p5k-e wifi/ap bios 1202, Ati hd2600xt Fixed! Ubuntu 9.10 alpha3 AMD64: Sleep: From a live cd, after pressing suspend from the quit Shut down menu with a couple of Firefox tabs open, the system sleeps fine. All harddisks go down, monitor goes to sleep, etc etc, blinking power-led on chassis shows that it is sleeping fine. Wake: After half an hour I turned on the machine with the power-button, screen wakes, audio is back, tested without extra ati/AMD drivers. BUG network manager applet died when woke up, so no network, went to terminal typed : sudo -s ifconfig eth0 up dhclient eth0 Right now I'm typing this comment from the suspended machine. Ubuntu 9.04 i386: hang: blinking cursor on blackscreen when using suspend/hibernate! The system will not even go to sleep and needs a reset! Harddisk screen etc stays on -- [Asus P5K-E] suspend/resume failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349102 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 252343] Re: Suspend to RAM cause ASUS P5K-E/WIFI-AP sata onboard controller malfunction
Asus P5k-e wifi/ap bios 1202, Core2Quad Q6600, ati hd2600xt Ubuntu 9.10 alpha3 AMD64: Works! https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/349102/comments/9 -- Suspend to RAM cause ASUS P5K-E/WIFI-AP sata onboard controller malfunction https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252343 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
