[Bug 1894323] Re: Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

2021-01-11 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package fence-agents - 4.0.25-2ubuntu1.2

---
fence-agents (4.0.25-2ubuntu1.2) bionic; urgency=medium

  * fence_aws backport from Focal (LP: #1894323):
+ d/p/lp1894323-01-fence_aws-new-agent.patch

 -- Rafael David Tinoco   Thu, 22 Oct 2020
04:47:00 +

** Changed in: fence-agents (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894323

Title:
  Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/1894323/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894323] Re: Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

2021-01-07 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
I verified the test case using the package available in bionic-proposed
and I confirm it is working as expected. I set up a 3 nodes cluster on
AWS to test this.

Note: When installing fence-agents also install the Suggested
dependencies, otherwise the 'fence_aws' command will not work.

ubuntu@node1:~$ cat /etc/os-release 
NAME="Ubuntu"
VERSION="18.04.5 LTS (Bionic Beaver)"
ID=ubuntu
ID_LIKE=debian
PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 18.04.5 LTS"
VERSION_ID="18.04"
HOME_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/;
SUPPORT_URL="https://help.ubuntu.com/;
BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/;
PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/privacy-policy;
VERSION_CODENAME=bionic
UBUNTU_CODENAME=bionic
ubuntu@node1:~$ dpkg -l | grep fence-agents
ii  fence-agents 4.0.25-2ubuntu1.2   amd64  
  Fence Agents for Red Hat Cluster
ubuntu@node1:~$ sudo crm configure show
node 1: node1
node 2: node2
node 3: node3
primitive fence-node1 stonith:fence_aws \
params access_key= secret_key="" region=us-east-2 
plug=i-093f875f9f2ffa1db 
pcmk_host_map="node1:i-093f875f9f2ffa1db;node2:i-08649fdfb0a74bc9f;node3:i-0394f790feeba28b0"
primitive fence-node2 stonith:fence_aws \
params access_key= secret_key="" region=us-east-2 
plug=i-08649fdfb0a74bc9f 
pcmk_host_map="node1:i-093f875f9f2ffa1db;node2:i-08649fdfb0a74bc9f;node3:i-0394f790feeba28b0"
primitive fence-node3 stonith:fence_aws \
params access_key= secret_key="" region=us-east-2 
plug=i-0394f790feeba28b0 
pcmk_host_map="node1:i-093f875f9f2ffa1db;node2:i-08649fdfb0a74bc9f;node3:i-0394f790feeba28b0"
location l-fence-node1 fence-node1 -inf: node1
location l-fence-node2 fence-node2 -inf: node2
location l-fence-node3 fence-node3 -inf: node3
property cib-bootstrap-options: \
have-watchdog=false \
dc-version=1.1.18-2b07d5c5a9 \
cluster-infrastructure=corosync \
cluster-name=clubionic \
stonith-enabled=on \
stonith-action=reboot \
no-quorum-policy=stop

If I go to node2 and run the following command to reject connections
from the network interface in use the node is properly fenced (in this
case rebooted):

ubuntu@node2:~$ sudo iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -j REJECT

After some minutes the node2 gets back online.

I also tested it without pacemaker in a standalone mode. I ran the
following command to do that:

ubunt@node3:~$ sudo fence_aws --plug= --action=reboot
--region=us-east-2 --access-key="xxx" --secret-key="xxx" --verbose

** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894323

Title:
  Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/1894323/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894323] Re: Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

2020-10-27 Thread Brian Murray
Hello Rafael, or anyone else affected,

Accepted fence-agents into bionic-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-
agents/4.0.25-2ubuntu1.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Changed in: fence-agents (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894323

Title:
  Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/1894323/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894323] Re: Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

2020-10-21 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
fence-agents (4.0.25-2ubuntu1.2) bionic; urgency=medium
  
  * fence_aws backport from Focal (LP: #1894323):
+ d/p/lp1894323-01-fence_aws-new-agent.patch

 -- Rafael David Tinoco   Thu, 22 Oct 2020
04:47:00 +



[rafaeldtinoco@bionic fence-agents]$ git ubuntu tag --upload

[rafaeldtinoco@bionic fence-agents]$ git describe 
upload/4.0.25-2ubuntu1.2

[rafaeldtinoco@bionic fence-agents]$ git push pkg upload/4.0.25-2ubuntu1.2 
Counting objects: 15, done.
Delta compression using up to 24 threads.
Compressing objects: 100% (15/15), done.
Writing objects: 100% (15/15), 4.49 KiB | 460.00 KiB/s, done.
Total 15 (delta 10), reused 0 (delta 0)
To ssh://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents
 * [new tag] upload/4.0.25-2ubuntu1.2 -> upload/4.0.25-2ubuntu1.2


[rafaeldtinoco@bionic ubuntu]$ debdiff fence-agents_4.0.25-2ubuntu1.1.dsc 
fence-agents_4.0.25-2ubuntu1.2.dsc | diffstat
 changelog  |7 +
 control|5 -
 patches/lp1894323-01-fence_aws-new-agent.patch |  286 
+
 patches/series |1 
 4 files changed, 298 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)


[rafaeldtinoco@bionic ubuntu]$ dput ubuntu 
fence-agents_4.0.25-2ubuntu1.2_source.changes
Uploading to ubuntu (via ftp to upload.ubuntu.com):
  Uploading fence-agents_4.0.25-2ubuntu1.2.dsc: done.
  Uploading fence-agents_4.0.25-2ubuntu1.2.debian.tar.xz: done.  
  Uploading fence-agents_4.0.25-2ubuntu1.2_source.buildinfo: done. 
  Uploading fence-agents_4.0.25-2ubuntu1.2_source.changes: done.
Successfully uploaded packages.



Note: the fence_aws agent primitive should be declared as:

primitive fence-bionic stonith:fence_aws \
params access_key= secret_key="" region=us-east-1 
pcmk_host_map="bionic01:i-068e134de1beddc7f;bionic02:i-0136eddd045ceb7e2;bionic03:i-0de279ab4e6d642c8"

and cluster properties as:

have-watchdog=false \
dc-version=1.1.18-2b07d5c5a9 \
cluster-infrastructure=corosync \
stonith-enabled=on \
stonith-action=reboot \
no-quorum-policy=stop \
cluster-name=bionic

crm configure might complain about you not specifying the "plug"
argument, you can safely ignore that as this fence_agent does not
require the plug argument (and this pacemaker version has an issue when
plug is given, see comment #11 for more information).

** Changed in: fence-agents (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: In Progress => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894323

Title:
  Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/1894323/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894323] Re: Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

2020-10-21 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
** Description changed:

+ SRU reviewer: I got a complex backport for Focal thinking about
+ introducing a better version of fence_aws in Bionic but I abandoned the
+ idea and created a simple 1 patch fence_aws backport to Bionic (so it is
+ like Focal, and not both be like Groovy).
+ 
  [Impact]
  
   * Currently Ubuntu Bionic does not have fence_aws available and that is
  needed in order to have a fully working HA solution in AWS environment.
  
   * fence_aws from Focal fence-agents (4.5.2-1) is missing some fixes
  that happened in between Focal and Groovy versions. With that, I
  initially opted to fully bring all the fixes from version 4.6.0 to Focal
  and backport this same version to Bionic (this way Bionic and Focal were
  in the same level).
  
   * After MR reviews, thinking about the SRU review, I agreed to minimize
  this change making Ubuntu Bionic fence_aws agent just like focal and
  working in any needed Focal fix for fence_aws (as long as there was a
  test case for it).
  
  [Test Case]
  
   * Provision 3 nodes in AWS with Ubuntu Focal (and Ubuntu Bionic) and
  configure it adding the following primitive as a fencing resource:
  
  primitive fence-focal stonith:fence_aws params access_key="" 
secret_key=""
  region="us-east-1" 
pcmk_host_map="focal01:i-034dc89cca4310b03;focal02:i-0a160b14b40f1330a;focal03:i-03b6976ab0a7f377c"
  
  and the cluster cib options:
  
  property cib-bootstrap-options: \
  have-watchdog=false \
  cluster-infrastructure=corosync \
  stonith-enabled=on \
  stonith-action=reboot \
  no-quorum-policy=stop \
  cluster-name=bionic
  
   * After that you can remove the interconnect of one of the nodes and
  watch the cluster to shutdown the node that was disconnected from the
  cluster ring.
  
  [Regression Potential]
  
   * Bionic wise:
  
     - Same as focal, but here it is even better situation as there isn't
  an existing fence_aws agent. Biggest problem here could be introduce
  something that does not fully work (which is technically not a
  regression).
  
  [Other Info]
  
  This is a request from AWS to backport existing fence_aws agent into
  Bionic
  
- 
  Currently fence-agents Ubuntu Bionic version is at:
  
  4.0.25-2ubuntu1
  
  and the fence_aws new agent started at:
  
  $ git tag --contains a3f45322 | head -1
  v4.1.0

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894323

Title:
  Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/1894323/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894323] Re: Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

2020-10-21 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  
-  * Currently Ubuntu Bionic does not have fence_aws available and that is
+  * Currently Ubuntu Bionic does not have fence_aws available and that is
  needed in order to have a fully working HA solution in AWS environment.
  
-  * fence_aws from Focal fence-agents (4.5.2-1) is missing some important
- fixes that happened in between Focal and Groovy versions. With that, I
- opted to fully bring all the fixes from version 4.6.0 to Focal and
- backport this same version to Bionic (this way Bionic and Focal are in
- the same level also).
+  * fence_aws from Focal fence-agents (4.5.2-1) is missing some fixes
+ that happened in between Focal and Groovy versions. With that, I
+ initially opted to fully bring all the fixes from version 4.6.0 to Focal
+ and backport this same version to Bionic (this way Bionic and Focal were
+ in the same level).
+ 
+  * After MR reviews, thinking about the SRU review, I agreed to minimize
+ this change making Ubuntu Bionic fence_aws agent just like focal and
+ working in any needed Focal fix for fence_aws (as long as there was a
+ test case for it).
  
  [Test Case]
  
-  * Provision 3 nodes in AWS with Ubuntu Focal (and Ubuntu Bionic) and
+  * Provision 3 nodes in AWS with Ubuntu Focal (and Ubuntu Bionic) and
  configure it adding the following primitive as a fencing resource:
  
  primitive fence-focal stonith:fence_aws params access_key="" 
secret_key=""
  region="us-east-1" 
pcmk_host_map="focal01:i-034dc89cca4310b03;focal02:i-0a160b14b40f1330a;focal03:i-03b6976ab0a7f377c"
  
  and the cluster cib options:
  
  property cib-bootstrap-options: \
- have-watchdog=false \
- cluster-infrastructure=corosync \
- stonith-enabled=on \
- stonith-action=reboot \
- no-quorum-policy=stop \
- cluster-name=bionic
+ have-watchdog=false \
+ cluster-infrastructure=corosync \
+ stonith-enabled=on \
+ stonith-action=reboot \
+ no-quorum-policy=stop \
+ cluster-name=bionic
  
-  * After that you can remove the interconnect of one of the nodes and
+  * After that you can remove the interconnect of one of the nodes and
  watch the cluster to shutdown the node that was disconnected from the
  cluster ring.
  
  [Regression Potential]
  
-  * Focal wise:
+  * Bionic wise:
  
-- We're only touching agents/aws/fence_aws.py and
- tests/data/metadata/fence_aws.xml files. This reduces *a lot* the scope
- of the code change and helps in the SRU approval (as the change is
- confined into the aws fence agent only).
- 
-- Biggest problem here could be related to rebuilds, as the fence-
- agents are directly called from pacemaker as "exec'ed scripts with right
- arguments", and there is no change to any part of the fence-agents core
- package.
- 
-  * Bionic wise:
- 
-- Same as focal, but here it is even better situation as there isn't
+    - Same as focal, but here it is even better situation as there isn't
  an existing fence_aws agent. Biggest problem here could be introduce
  something that does not fully work (which is technically not a
  regression).
  
  [Other Info]
  
- This is a request from AWS to backport existing fence_aws agent into
- Bionic:
- 
- 
- commit 50772024
- Author: Oyvind Albrigtsen 
- Date:   Mon May 25 12:07:14 2020
- 
- fence_aws: improve boto3_debug boolean handling
- 
- commit be206158
- Author: Oyvind Albrigtsen 
- Date:   Mon May 25 12:03:53 2020
- 
- fence_aws: catch ConnectionError and suppress traceback for caught
- exceptions
- 
- commit 9758f8c8
- Author: Oyvind Albrigtsen 
- Date:   Tue Mar 24 14:31:13 2020
- 
- fence_aws: fix Python 3 encoding issue
- 
- commit 3f5676a7
- Author: gguifelixamz <45173771+gguifelix...@users.noreply.github.com>
- Date:   Fri Mar 20 14:41:07 2020
- 
- fence_aws: Fix fence race, logging improvement and new debug option
- (#323)
- 
- * fence_aws: Fix fence race condition by checking local instance status
- * fence_aws: Use local logger and improve logging experience
- * fence_aws: Decouple boto3 and botocore debug logging from local logging
- 
- commit 1c2f791b
- Author: Oyvind Albrigtsen 
+ This is a request from AWS to backport existing fence_aws agent into Bionic:
+ @redhat.com>
  Date:   Thu Mar 5 13:10:29 2020
  
  fence_aws: improve connect parameter logic, so region can be specified
  as parameter, while using role or keys from ~/.aws/config
  
  commit 7ac16fb2
  Author: Oyvind Albrigtsen 
  Date:   Fri Jan 31 14:53:47 2020
  
  fence_aws: improve logging and metadata/usage text
  
  commit a3f45322
  Author: Oyvind Albrigtsen 
  Date:   Tue Mar 7 10:04:49 2017
  
  fence_aws: new agent
  
  
  Currently fence-agents Ubuntu Bionic version is at:
  
  4.0.25-2ubuntu1
  
  and the fence_aws new agent started at:
  
  $ git tag --contains a3f45322 | head -1
  v4.1.0

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  
   * Currently Ubuntu Bionic does not have fence_aws available and that is
  

[Bug 1894323] Re: Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

2020-10-21 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
To help with SRU review, I'm adding here the discussion taken from the
merge review.. basically I would like to give it a try backporting all
fixes for fence_aws into Focal and adding that same agent version in
Bionic (like a minor SRU exception). Instead of relying in the test case
results, I would like to rely in my functional/regression tests for a
pacemaker cluster configured in AWS with this new agent (if possible).

 Discussion with @bryce from the Ubuntu Server Team:

> I also read through each of the patches to understand what they do,
and make sure the changes look safe, which they indeed do.  One thought
I had though is that the common theme in the patches is improvements to
debug/logging output; the SRU team sometimes demurs over debug/logging
changes as less important than actual bug fixes.  At least you'll want
to include good justification on this in the SRU text.

My justification to that is that Bionic does not have anything and I
really would like Focal to be "as good as Focal", instead of adding
something better in Bionic just because it did not have anything. Or
even adding something not as good as Groovy just because of formal
reasons.

> Commit 1c2f791b changes the cli option behavior, which is akin to an
API change.  I.e. before if you passed --region but not --access-key or
--secret-key it would ignore --region and use configured values, with
this change you can specify just --region and the keys will come from
the config file.  This feels more like a behavioral change than a bug
fix, so I might anticipate some pushback from the SRU team on this.

Yes, this was per AWS request... and follows the same idea as the
previous justification. This change allows one not to explicitly put the
access or secret keys in the cluster CIB file (so its more secure also).

> In terms of SRU, I notice there are not (upstream|downstream) bug
reports associated with the patches, which may make one wonder if these
fix actual defects encountered in the wild, or are more like
clarification/refactoring.

> I understand the logic of since the scripts don't exist in bionic to
bring the current versions rather so as to have the most up to date
code.  But as you mention this then leaves a weird situation and having
to pull delta into focal that otherwise might not be needed.

> Did you consider pulling the fence_aws from focal rather than the one
in groovy?  (And then cherrypicking the most relevant bug fixes from
groovy, like the encoding fix and/or the race fix?)

Yes I did.. unfortunately its a SRU philosophical question. I'm
considering fence_aws here as a confined code that is mostly supported
by AWS themselves. I can go on that direction but I feel it is not the
best for our user base.

> Alternatively, if you definitely do want to backport the whole stack,
did you consider filing for an SRU exception for this package?  If it
really is important to keep the scripts identical on all LTS's that
might be a better long term approach.

That would be a no-go because of agents metadata and pacemaker.
Pacemaker should be able to handler older and newer fence-agents
packages.. but it is not as good as "compatible with all further
versions".

I would like this to be considered a small SRU exception as it is for
fence_aws only.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894323

Title:
  Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/1894323/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894323] Re: Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

2020-10-21 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
** Description changed:

- This is a request to backport existing fence_aws agent into Bionic:
+ [Impact]
+ 
+  * Currently Ubuntu Bionic does not have fence_aws available and that is
+ needed in order to have a fully working HA solution in AWS environment.
+ 
+  * fence_aws from Focal fence-agents (4.5.2-1) is missing some important
+ fixes that happened in between Focal and Groovy versions. With that, I
+ opted to fully bring all the fixes from version 4.6.0 to Focal and
+ backport this same version to Bionic (this way Bionic and Focal are in
+ the same level also).
+ 
+ [Test Case]
+ 
+  * Provision 3 nodes in AWS with Ubuntu Focal (and Ubuntu Bionic) and
+ configure it adding the following primitive as a fencing resource:
+ 
+ primitive fence-focal stonith:fence_aws params access_key="" 
secret_key=""
+ region="us-east-1" 
pcmk_host_map="focal01:i-034dc89cca4310b03;focal02:i-0a160b14b40f1330a;focal03:i-03b6976ab0a7f377c"
+ 
+ and the cluster cib options:
+ 
+ property cib-bootstrap-options: \
+ have-watchdog=false \
+ cluster-infrastructure=corosync \
+ stonith-enabled=on \
+ stonith-action=reboot \
+ no-quorum-policy=stop \
+ cluster-name=bionic
+ 
+  * After that you can remove the interconnect of one of the nodes and
+ watch the cluster to shutdown the node that was disconnected from the
+ cluster ring.
+ 
+ [Regression Potential]
+ 
+  * Focal wise:
+ 
+- We're only touching agents/aws/fence_aws.py and
+ tests/data/metadata/fence_aws.xml files. This reduces *a lot* the scope
+ of the code change and helps in the SRU approval (as the change is
+ confined into the aws fence agent only).
+ 
+- Biggest problem here could be related to rebuilds, as the fence-
+ agents are directly called from pacemaker as "exec'ed scripts with right
+ arguments", and there is no change to any part of the fence-agents core
+ package.
+ 
+  * Bionic wise:
+ 
+- Same as focal, but here it is even better situation as there isn't
+ an existing fence_aws agent. Biggest problem here could be introduce
+ something that does not fully work (which is technically not a
+ regression).
+ 
+ [Other Info]
+ 
+ This is a request from AWS to backport existing fence_aws agent into
+ Bionic:
  
  
  commit 50772024
  Author: Oyvind Albrigtsen 
  Date:   Mon May 25 12:07:14 2020
  
- fence_aws: improve boto3_debug boolean handling
+ fence_aws: improve boto3_debug boolean handling
  
  commit be206158
  Author: Oyvind Albrigtsen 
  Date:   Mon May 25 12:03:53 2020
  
- fence_aws: catch ConnectionError and suppress traceback for caught
+ fence_aws: catch ConnectionError and suppress traceback for caught
  exceptions
  
  commit 9758f8c8
  Author: Oyvind Albrigtsen 
  Date:   Tue Mar 24 14:31:13 2020
  
- fence_aws: fix Python 3 encoding issue
+ fence_aws: fix Python 3 encoding issue
  
  commit 3f5676a7
  Author: gguifelixamz <45173771+gguifelix...@users.noreply.github.com>
  Date:   Fri Mar 20 14:41:07 2020
  
- fence_aws: Fix fence race, logging improvement and new debug option (#323)
- 
- * fence_aws: Fix fence race condition by checking local instance status
- * fence_aws: Use local logger and improve logging experience
- * fence_aws: Decouple boto3 and botocore debug logging from local logging
+ fence_aws: Fix fence race, logging improvement and new debug option
+ (#323)
+ 
+ * fence_aws: Fix fence race condition by checking local instance status
+ * fence_aws: Use local logger and improve logging experience
+ * fence_aws: Decouple boto3 and botocore debug logging from local logging
  
  commit 1c2f791b
  Author: Oyvind Albrigtsen 
  Date:   Thu Mar 5 13:10:29 2020
  
- fence_aws: improve connect parameter logic, so region can be specified
- as parameter, while using role or keys from ~/.aws/config
+ fence_aws: improve connect parameter logic, so region can be specified
+ as parameter, while using role or keys from ~/.aws/config
  
  commit 7ac16fb2
  Author: Oyvind Albrigtsen 
  Date:   Fri Jan 31 14:53:47 2020
  
- fence_aws: improve logging and metadata/usage text
+ fence_aws: improve logging and metadata/usage text
  
  commit a3f45322
  Author: Oyvind Albrigtsen 
  Date:   Tue Mar 7 10:04:49 2017
  
- fence_aws: new agent
+ fence_aws: new agent
  
  
  Currently fence-agents Ubuntu Bionic version is at:
  
  4.0.25-2ubuntu1
  
  and the fence_aws new agent started at:
  
  $ git tag --contains a3f45322 | head -1
  v4.1.0

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894323

Title:
  Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/1894323/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894323] Re: Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

2020-10-19 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
** Merge proposal unlinked:
   
https://code.launchpad.net/~rafaeldtinoco/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+git/fence-agents/+merge/392432

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894323

Title:
  Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/1894323/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894323] Re: Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

2020-10-18 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Merge proposal linked:
   
https://code.launchpad.net/~rafaeldtinoco/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+git/fence-agents/+merge/392432

** Merge proposal linked:
   
https://code.launchpad.net/~rafaeldtinoco/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+git/fence-agents/+merge/392433

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894323

Title:
  Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/1894323/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894323] Re: Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

2020-10-18 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
Everything is good and ready but I have discovered a small issue in the
Bionic Backport... and relates to:

https://access.redhat.com/solutions/4642491

The story is this: when declaring the fence_aws primitive, you can
either declare it as a single resource and describe the pcmk_host_map...
OR you can declare one fence resource PER NODE doing the exact same
thing BUT using the "plug/port" resource argument. The thing is... in
Focal, both methods work but in Bionic, the second method does not work.
It is not a big deal as there are some fence agents designed to work
with "pcmk_host_map" only, and some others are designed to work with
"plug/port" argument... but I have opened the bug:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pacemaker/+bug/1900374

to deal with this in a later moment (might require pacemaker bisecting,
etc)

For this SRU.. after it is complete, the correct way of declaring the
fence_aws resource is:

# focal

node 1: focal01
node 2: focal02
node 3: focal03

primitive fence-focal stonith:fence_aws \
 params access_key= secret_key="" region=us-east-1 
pcmk_host_map="focal01:i-abcdefgh;focal02:i-ijlmnop;focal03:i-qrstuvxz" 

property cib-bootstrap-options: \
 have-watchdog=false \
 dc-version=2.0.3-4b1f869f0f \
 cluster-infrastructure=corosync \
 stonith-enabled=on \
 stonith-action=reboot \
 no-quorum-policy=stop \
 cluster-name=focal

# bionic

node 1: bionic01
node 2: bionic02
node 3: bionic03

primitive fence-bionic stonith:fence_aws \
 params access_key= secret_key="" region=us-east-1 
pcmk_host_map="bionic01:i-abcdefgh;bionic02:i-ijlmnop;bionic03:i-qrstuvxz" 

property cib-bootstrap-options: \
have-watchdog=false \
dc-version=1.1.18-2b07d5c5a9 \
cluster-infrastructure=corosync \
stonith-enabled=on \
stonith-action=reboot \
no-quorum-policy=stop \
cluster-name=bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894323

Title:
  Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/1894323/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894323] Re: Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

2020-10-14 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
(how to get fence_aws working with bionic and aws <- keywords for
google)

# Bionic fence_aws tests with the backport (from the ppa):

[rafaeldtinoco@bionic01 ~]$ crm status
Stack: corosync
Current DC: bionic01 (version 1.1.18-2b07d5c5a9) - partition with quorum
Last updated: Thu Oct 15 01:25:05 2020
Last change: Thu Oct 15 01:25:01 2020 by root via cibadmin on bionic01

3 nodes configured
1 resource configured

Online: [ bionic01 bionic02 bionic03 ]

Full list of resources:

 fence-bionic   (stonith:fence_aws):Started bionic01



and then I fail on purpose the interconnect on node03 (bionic03):

[rafaeldtinoco@bionic01 ~]$ crm status
Stack: corosync
Current DC: bionic01 (version 1.1.18-2b07d5c5a9) - partition with quorum
Last updated: Thu Oct 15 01:26:57 2020
Last change: Thu Oct 15 01:25:01 2020 by root via cibadmin on bionic01

3 nodes configured
1 resource configured

Node bionic03: UNCLEAN (offline)
Online: [ bionic01 bionic02 ]

Full list of resources:

 fence-bionic   (stonith:fence_aws):Started bionic01

and the AWS console I could see machine being restarted. After bionic03
was restarted...




[rafaeldtinoco@bionic01 ~]$ crm status
Stack: corosync
Current DC: bionic01 (version 1.1.18-2b07d5c5a9) - partition with quorum
Last updated: Thu Oct 15 01:27:01 2020
Last change: Thu Oct 15 01:25:01 2020 by root via cibadmin on bionic01

3 nodes configured
1 resource configured

Node bionic03: UNCLEAN (offline)
Online: [ bionic01 bionic02 ]

Full list of resources:

 fence-bionic   (stonith:fence_aws):Started bionic01



I need to fix something: fence_aws agent requires python-request and
python-boto3 libraries to be installed. I will have to put those as
fence-agents Recommends. I have also to check a requirement on "plug"
argument (as it is not really required for fence_aws to work).

The way I declared the primitive was:

primitive fence-bionic stonith:fence_aws \
 params \
access_key= \
secret_key="" \
region=us-east-1 \

pcmk_host_map="bionic01:i-068e134de1bed;bionic02:i-0136eddd045ce;bionic03:i-0de279ab4e6d6"
 \
power_timeout=240 \
pcmk_reboot_timeout=480 \
pcmk_reboot_retries=4

property cib-bootstrap-options: \
have-watchdog=false \
dc-version=1.1.18-2b07d5c5a9 \ 
cluster-infrastructure=corosync \
stonith-enabled=on \
stonith-action=reboot \
no-quorum-policy=stop \
cluster-name=bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894323

Title:
  Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/1894323/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894323] Re: Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

2020-10-14 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
Moving on to Bionic backport now...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894323

Title:
  Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/1894323/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894323] Re: Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

2020-10-14 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Merge proposal linked:
   
https://code.launchpad.net/~rafaeldtinoco/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+git/fence-agents/+merge/392225

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894323

Title:
  Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/1894323/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894323] Re: Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

2020-10-14 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
Using my proposed new version:

$ dpkg -l | grep -i fence
ii  fence-agents  4.5.2-1ubuntu1~202010091535   amd64   
 Fence Agents for Red Hat Cluster



[rafaeldtinoco@focal01 ~]$ crm status
Cluster Summary:
  * Stack: corosync
  * Current DC: focal03 (version 2.0.3-4b1f869f0f) - partition with quorum
  * Last updated: Wed Oct 14 12:11:18 2020
  * Last change:  Wed Oct 14 04:38:10 2020 by root via cibadmin on focal01
  * 3 nodes configured
  * 1 resource instance configured

Node List:
  * Online: [ focal01 focal02 focal03 ]

Full List of Resources:
  * fence-focal (stonith:fence_aws): Started focal01



[rafaeldtinoco@focal01 ~]$ crm status
Cluster Summary:
  * Stack: corosync
  * Current DC: focal01 (version 2.0.3-4b1f869f0f) - partition with quorum
  * Last updated: Wed Oct 14 12:11:24 2020
  * Last change:  Wed Oct 14 04:38:10 2020 by root via cibadmin on focal01
  * 3 nodes configured
  * 1 resource instance configured

Node List:
  * Node focal03: UNCLEAN (offline)
  * Online: [ focal01 focal02 ]

Full List of Resources:
  * fence-focal (stonith:fence_aws): Started focal01

Pending Fencing Actions:
  * reboot of focal03 pending: client=pacemaker-controld.444, origin=focal01



[rafaeldtinoco@focal01 ~]$ crm status
Cluster Summary:
  * Stack: corosync
  * Current DC: focal01 (version 2.0.3-4b1f869f0f) - partition with quorum
  * Last updated: Wed Oct 14 12:13:59 2020
  * Last change:  Wed Oct 14 04:38:10 2020 by root via cibadmin on focal01
  * 3 nodes configured
  * 1 resource instance configured

Node List:
  * Online: [ focal01 focal02 focal03 ]

Full List of Resources:
  * fence-focal (stonith:fence_aws): Started focal01

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894323

Title:
  Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/1894323/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894323] Re: Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

2020-10-13 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
(how to get fence_aws working with focal and aws <- keywords for google)

# Focal fence_aws tests without any backport (current version):

node 1: focal01
node 2: focal02
node 3: focal03
primitive fence-focal stonith:fence_aws \
params access_key= secret_key="" region=us-east-1 
pcmk_host_map="focal01:i-034dc89cca431;focal02:i-0a160b14b40f1;focal03:i-03b6976ab0a7f"
 power_timeout=240 pcmk_reboot_timeout=480 pcmk_reboot_retries=4
property cib-bootstrap-options: \
have-watchdog=false \
dc-version=2.0.3-4b1f869f0f \
cluster-infrastructure=corosync \
stonith-enabled=on \
stonith-action=reboot \
no-quorum-policy=stop \
cluster-name=focal

Fencing worked as expected:

[rafaeldtinoco@focal01 ~]$ crm status
Cluster Summary:
  * Stack: corosync
  * Current DC: focal01 (version 2.0.3-4b1f869f0f) - partition with quorum
  * Last updated: Wed Oct 14 04:29:34 2020
  * Last change:  Wed Oct 14 04:28:57 2020 by root via cibadmin on focal01
  * 3 nodes configured
  * 1 resource instance configured

Node List:
  * Online: [ focal01 focal02 focal03 ]

Full List of Resources:
  * fence-focal (stonith:fence_aws): Started focal01



[rafaeldtinoco@focal01 ~]$ crm status
Cluster Summary:
  * Stack: corosync
  * Current DC: focal01 (version 2.0.3-4b1f869f0f) - partition with quorum
  * Last updated: Wed Oct 14 04:31:16 2020
  * Last change:  Wed Oct 14 04:28:57 2020 by root via cibadmin on focal01
  * 3 nodes configured
  * 1 resource instance configured

Node List:
  * Node focal03: UNCLEAN (offline)
  * Online: [ focal01 focal02 ]

Full List of Resources:
  * fence-focal (stonith:fence_aws): Started focal01

Pending Fencing Actions:
  * reboot of focal03 pending: client=pacemaker-controld.3585, origin=focal01



[rafaeldtinoco@focal01 ~]$ crm status
Cluster Summary:
  * Stack: corosync
  * Current DC: focal01 (version 2.0.3-4b1f869f0f) - partition with quorum
  * Last updated: Wed Oct 14 04:32:14 2020
  * Last change:  Wed Oct 14 04:28:57 2020 by root via cibadmin on focal01
  * 3 nodes configured
  * 1 resource instance configured

Node List:
  * Online: [ focal01 focal02 focal03 ]

Full List of Resources:
  * fence-focal (stonith:fence_aws): Started focal01



And EC2 AWS console showed instance being shutdown and restarting
appropriately.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894323

Title:
  Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/1894323/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894323] Re: Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

2020-10-09 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
** Changed in: fence-agents (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Status: Confirmed => In Progress

** Changed in: fence-agents (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: Confirmed => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894323

Title:
  Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/1894323/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894323] Re: Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

2020-10-09 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
I'm also providing a PPA containing a full v4.6.0 fence_aws backport to
Ubuntu Bionic fence-agents package at:

https://launchpad.net/~rafaeldtinoco/+archive/ubuntu/lp1894323-bionic

with source at:

https://code.launchpad.net/~rafaeldtinoco/ubuntu/+source/fence-
agents/+git/fence-agents/+ref/lp1894323-bionic-v4.6.0-backport/



Like explained in the previous comment, Bionic fence-agents package does
not have fence_aws... so I have backported not only the fence_aws agent
inclusion from Focal (just 1 commit), but also all the fixes up to
Groovy (several fixes were provided from Focal to Groovy).

I'm going to test both and as for a SRU exception considering this as an
"enablement".

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894323

Title:
  Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/1894323/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894323] Re: Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

2020-10-09 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
I'm providing a PPA containing a full v4.6.0 fence_aws backport to
Ubuntu Focal fence-agents package at:

https://launchpad.net/~rafaeldtinoco/+archive/ubuntu/lp1894323-focal

with source at:

https://code.launchpad.net/~rafaeldtinoco/ubuntu/+source/fence-
agents/+git/fence-agents/+ref/lp1894323-focal-v4.6.0-backport/



Because of the nature of fence-agents, where they're practically
isolated scripts in the form of a metadata <-> python script pair, I
think it would be okay to SRU a particular agent to the latest Ubuntu
version. All regression risk is confined to the agent itself and it
would be easy to fix/revert if ever needed (without jeopardizing those
not relying in the agent).

For example, Groovy has fence-agents v4.6.0... containing all the
patches needed for a good fence_aws support. I'm backporting all fixes
from Groovy to Focal in this PPA.

Focal had only the initial fence_aws patch, but missing all the fixes
from v4.5.2 to v4.6.0. Bionic is missing all commits, including the
fence_aws agent.

I'm going to backport everything - the agent and fixes - to Bionic.. but
it would be weird to have a more updated agent in Bionic (since it does
not have the agent, it would be able to have the agent introduction with
all fixes) than in Focal (that is why this SRU tries to keep both, Focal
and Bionic, in the same codelevel for fence_aws).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894323

Title:
  Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/1894323/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894323] Re: Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

2020-09-22 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
I see that AWS has 2 fencing mechanisms:

- fence_aws using boto3 library (in fence-agents)
- fence_ec2 (in cluster-glue)

Bug:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cluster-glue/+bug/1895355

has brought fence_ec2 support to our cluster-glue package by backporting
needed patches. Perhaps that should also be checked for backport
(backporting fence_ec2 to Focal and Bionic if possible).

I opened the following bug for this:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cluster-glue/+bug/1896696

** Changed in: fence-agents (Ubuntu Bionic)
 Assignee: Rafael David Tinoco (rafaeldtinoco) => (unassigned)

** Changed in: fence-agents (Ubuntu Bionic)
   Importance: Undecided => Wishlist

** Changed in: fence-agents (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided => Wishlist

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894323

Title:
  Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/1894323/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894323] Re: Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

2020-09-22 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
In bug:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/1894325

I have synced v4.6.0-1 recently from Debian, and it includes fence_aws
and fence_ibmz:

- fence_aws agent being backported to Bionic (LP: #1894323)
- Add LPAR fence agent to Pacemaker (LP: #1889070)

So in this bug we should backport fence_aws to Focal and Bionic, if
possible.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894323

Title:
  Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/1894323/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894323] Re: Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

2020-09-08 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
** Merge proposal unlinked:
   
https://code.launchpad.net/~rafaeldtinoco/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+git/fence-agents/+merge/390322

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894323

Title:
  Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/1894323/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1894323] Re: Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

2020-09-08 Thread Rafael David Tinoco
I'm marking Focal as confirmed because it can catch up with fixes made
for version in v4.6.0 so Bionic and Focal can have the same
version/features for fence_aws.

** Summary changed:

- Add fence_aws fencing agent to Bionic (4.0.25-2ubuntu1)
+ Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

** Changed in: fence-agents (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: Fix Released => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894323

Title:
  Add fence_aws fencing from v4.6.0 agent to Bionic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/1894323/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs