[Bug 433397] Re: FFe for emacs23
Pardon a stupid question, but what would it take to get emacs23 in main? Installing the old version is likely to seem like overtly cautious in the eyes of some users. -- FFe for emacs23 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433397 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 433397] Re: FFe for emacs23
era era+launchpad@iki.fi writes: Pardon a stupid question, but what would it take to get emacs23 in main? Installing the old version is likely to seem like overtly cautious in the eyes of some users. 17:23 siretart` @ftpmasters: will emacs23 be semi-automatically be promoted to main and emacs22 demoted to universe during the usual archive cleanups, or is a full MIR report required for this? 17:23 pitti siretart`: no full MIR necessary, it's by and large just a new version 17:23 pitti if we can promote/demote at the same time, it will pretty much just happen -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 -- FFe for emacs23 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433397 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 433397] Re: FFe for emacs23
Ouch, that was a surprise. I've been using Karmic with the emacs package and therefore emacs23 for a few weeks, without significant problems (just Emacs quirks which I hope will be tidied up in time). Today, update-manager tried to install emacs22, which I didn't want. I appreciate that emacs23 isn't in main, and emacs of course must be. (Since I include universe I hadn't noticed any problems, and just assumed emacs23 was the version to be used in Karmic.) Nonetheless, the surprise installation of emacs22 was undesired. Is it possible to have the emacs package depend on emacs22 OR emacs23, and prefer emacs22 if neither is installed already, to avoid this? -- FFe for emacs23 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433397 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 433397] Re: FFe for emacs23
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 06:02:08PM -, Jamie Lokier wrote: Is it possible to have the emacs package depend on emacs22 OR emacs23, and prefer emacs22 if neither is installed already, to avoid this? No, that's contrary to the purpose of the 'emacs' package. If you want emacs23 and not emacs22, then uninstall the 'emacs' package. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org -- FFe for emacs23 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433397 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 433397] Re: FFe for emacs23
This merge has stolen the 'emacs' binary package from emacs22, and now emacs depends on emacs23 and is uninstallable in main. This needs to be fixed. ** Changed in: emacs22 (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist = High ** Changed in: emacs22 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Triaged -- FFe for emacs23 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433397 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 433397] Re: FFe for emacs23
** Also affects: emacs22 (Ubuntu Karmic) Importance: High Status: Triaged ** Also affects: emacs23 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- FFe for emacs23 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433397 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 433397] Re: FFe for emacs23
fixing emacs22 now. emacs23 also needs reuploaded to stop building emacs. ** Changed in: emacs23 (Ubuntu Karmic) Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: emacs23 (Ubuntu Karmic) Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: emacs22 (Ubuntu Karmic) Status: Triaged = In Progress ** Changed in: emacs22 (Ubuntu Karmic) Assignee: (unassigned) = Steve Langasek (vorlon) -- FFe for emacs23 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433397 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 433397] Re: FFe for emacs23
This bug was fixed in the package emacs22 - 22.2-0ubuntu5 --- emacs22 (22.2-0ubuntu5) karmic; urgency=low * Claim back the 'emacs' binary package, which was incorrectly moved to emacs23 in a post-beta merge. LP: #433397. -- Steve Langasek steve.langa...@ubuntu.com Sun, 11 Oct 2009 19:40:32 + ** Changed in: emacs22 (Ubuntu Karmic) Status: In Progress = Fix Released -- FFe for emacs23 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433397 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 433397] Re: FFe for emacs23
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/emacs22 -- FFe for emacs23 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433397 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 433397] Re: FFe for emacs23
This bug was fixed in the package emacs23 - 23.1+1-4ubuntu2 --- emacs23 (23.1+1-4ubuntu2) karmic; urgency=low * Stop shipping emacs binary so emacs22 in main doesn't get hijacked (LP: #433397) - Comment out the binary in debian/control -- Scott Kitterman sc...@kitterman.com Sun, 11 Oct 2009 23:22:39 -0400 ** Changed in: emacs23 (Ubuntu Karmic) Status: Triaged = Fix Released -- FFe for emacs23 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433397 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 433397] Re: FFe for emacs23
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/emacs23 ** Changed in: emacs22 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- FFe for emacs23 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433397 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 433397] Re: FFe for emacs23
Thanks very much for this, folks. -- FFe for emacs23 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433397 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 433397] Re: FFe for emacs23
StefanPotyra stefan.pot...@informatik.uni-erlangen.de writes: (subscribing siretart as another source for information). Just to make it clear, I'm not opposing to get a newer emacs in in general (even though I'm a vi user :P). What's the state of emacs- snapshot right now? Is emacs23 newer? Should we drop emacs-snapshot (and rdepends) in favour of emacs23 or should we go the other way round and update emacs-snapshot to emacs23? Or does it make sense to have 3 versions around for karmic? emacs-snapshot remains to track the HEAD branch and is updated every 2-3 weeks in Romains repository. He updates it in his private debian repo, and also uploads to the ubuntu-elisp PPA. We can argue that we should provide emacs-snapshot only from the ~elisp PPA, though. As for the released versions of emacs, I really think we should go with emacs22 and emacs23. Having emacs-snapshot wouldn't hurt IMO. We do the same with gcc-snapshot after all. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 -- FFe for emacs23 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433397 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 433397] Re: FFe for emacs23
Ack from me too. Approved. ** Changed in: emacs22 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: emacs22 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- FFe for emacs23 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433397 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 433397] Re: FFe for emacs23
Ok, thanks, fair enough, +1 from me to get emacs23 in. Nonetheless, the last upload of emacs-snapshot to ubuntu proper was during jaunty. I guess we should either update this from Romains repository or remove it. Do you agree? -- FFe for emacs23 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433397 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 433397] Re: FFe for emacs23
(subscribing siretart as another source for information). Just to make it clear, I'm not opposing to get a newer emacs in in general (even though I'm a vi user :P). What's the state of emacs- snapshot right now? Is emacs23 newer? Should we drop emacs-snapshot (and rdepends) in favour of emacs23 or should we go the other way round and update emacs-snapshot to emacs23? Or does it make sense to have 3 versions around for karmic? -- FFe for emacs23 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433397 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 433397] Re: FFe for emacs23
Hm... then we'd end up with a 3rd version of emacs in universe, as there's also emacs-snaphost. Romain, what's your opinion? -- FFe for emacs23 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433397 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 433397] Re: FFe for emacs23
** Package changed: dpkg (Ubuntu) = emacs22 (Ubuntu) -- FFe for emacs23 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433397 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
