[Bug 715056] Re: invalid ssl-certificates in /etc/postfix/main.cf after security upgrade
/!\ W A R N I N G /!\ The last version (1:1.2.9-1ubuntu6.4) also affected us. After upgrading today (2011-06-02), it overwrote smtpd_recipient_restrictions and smtpd_sender_restrictions. The check_policy_service, check_recipient_access, reject_invalid_hostname , reject_non_fqdn_hostname , reject_non_fqdn_sender and reject_non_fqdn_recipient settings were removed, among others. :-( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/715056 Title: invalid ssl-certificates in /etc/postfix/main.cf after security upgrade -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 791984] [NEW] dovecot-postfix upgrade overwrites main.cf settings
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: dovecot-postfix /!\ W A R N I N G /!\ After upgrading today (2011-06-02), it overwrote smtpd_recipient_restrictions and smtpd_sender_restrictions. The check_policy_service, check_recipient_access, reject_invalid_hostname , reject_non_fqdn_hostname , reject_non_fqdn_sender and reject_non_fqdn_recipient settings were removed, among others. :-( ** Affects: dovecot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791984 Title: dovecot-postfix upgrade overwrites main.cf settings -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 184525] Re: awstats doesn't update
Hi! I'm running apache2 on Ubuntu Server 10.04. Looking at /etc/cron.d/awstats I can see that awstats runs as www-data: # cat /etc/cron.d/awstats 0,10,20,30,40,50 * * * * www-data [ -x /usr/lib/cgi-bin/awstats.pl -a -f /etc/awstats/awstats.conf -a -r /var/log/apache2/access.log ] /usr/lib/cgi-bin/awstats.pl -config=awstats -update /dev/null But, permissions on /var/log/apache2 are insufficient to let awstats do it's job: drwxr-x--- 2 root adm apache2 (others can't access to that directory) IDEM with the access.log file: -rw-r- 1 root adm access.log (others can't access to that file) One possible solution is to run the awstats cron job as root. Other possible solution is to change files and directories permissions. Both with unknown security impacts. -- awstats doesn't update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184525 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to awstats in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 462169] Re: nmbd dies on startup when network interfaces are not up yet
I just installed the latest 10.04 (including updates) and the same problem happened to me. In case someone might find this information useful, this is how I fixed it: In file /etc/init/smbd.conf change this: start on local-filesystems into this: start on (local-filesystems and net-device-up IFACE!=lo) (which is how nmbd is also started, btw). Hope it helps. -- nmbd dies on startup when network interfaces are not up yet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462169 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 57153] Re: xorg-server 1:1.0.2-0ubuntu10.3 breaks X: no screens found
I got the same problem on an IBM THinkPad X32 with ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Mobility M6 LY card. Had to downgrade yesterday. I upgraded to new version today and no problem. Scary moment, was fiddling with dpkg- reconfigure stuff for a while, before deciding to downgrade... -- xorg-server 1:1.0.2-0ubuntu10.3 breaks X: no screens found https://launchpad.net/bugs/57153 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246141] Re: no support for realtek rtl8187se
Hi all, Just want to thank you guys... you rock!!! I've been following this thread in the last days because I'm a owner of a msi wind u100 laptop and was trying for the first time the Ubuntu 8.04 linux distribution. I was almost giving up of having wireless in it but tried building the driver following instructions as posted here... and what can I say... it works like a charm. I'm very happy with Ubuntu (only 1 week of experience so far)... maybe I won't go back to windows no more... :) Kind regards Fernando -- no support for realtek rtl8187se https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246141 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246141] Re: no support for realtek rtl8187se
Hi, In my case I had this working doing the following before building the driver: 1- First I removed the following libraries (backing up first of course) based on a comment by marc.milliien in http://forums.msiwind.net/post51751.html sudo rm -rv /lib/modules/2.6.24-21-generic/kernel/drivers/net/wireless/rtl8187.ko sudo rm -rv /lib/modules/2.6.24-21-generic/kernel/net/ieee80211 sudo rm -rv /lib/modules/2.6.24-21-generic/ubuntu/wireless/rtl8187-usb sudo depmod 2- then I executed the procedure mentioned last by Coffelius and rebooted... I had the driver recognized and wireless this way P.S. I'm using 2.6.24-21-generic as atested by command (sorry I'm kinda a newbie with linux kernel stuff) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a Linux fpereira-laptop 2.6.24-21-generic #1 SMP Tue Oct 21 23:43:45 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux Hope it helps anyone. It surely helped me :) Cheers Fernando -- no support for realtek rtl8187se https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246141 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 38687] Re: [dapper] Items of the menu are not highlighted
I have exactly the same problem, but en Kubuntu Gutsy... (after installing the setup manager for the grub)... How did you fix the problem in Dapper? Perhaps I could do the same in Kubuntu... -- [dapper] Items of the menu are not highlighted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/38687 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 144356] Re: Audio from Flash in Firefox does not go to correct sound device
The following solution worked for me (From http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=543878) It comes down to getting alsa to use the right card. Type asoundconf list Then asoundconf set-default-card INSERTCARDNAMEFROMLISTHERE Then alsa has a default card to look for and flash and youtube will work. -Fernando -- Audio from Flash in Firefox does not go to correct sound device https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144356 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 120834] Re: intel gm965 freezes with 3d applications
Hi, I faced some problems too with the Compaq 6510b... I solved installing the xserver-xorg-video-intel and the compizconfig-settings-manager packages... The 3D, resolution, all working well. My xorg-conf is attached. Please notice that the resolution of the monitor is fake However, the dual-screen does not work properly. When I connect the external monitor the laptop's monitor resolution crashes and I can't manage how I make a extended (right-side) screen. I just take a copy from the laptop's monitor on the external one. Some idea??? ** Attachment added: XORG Configuration file http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10308059/xorg.conf -- intel gm965 freezes with 3d applications https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120834 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 224498] [NEW] aspire 5520 atheros wifi doesnt work
Public bug reported: All the restricted drives are up and runing, but the wifi connection simply doesnt appear in network-manager. As if it doesnt exist. But when listed throught its there. Using ubuntu 8. I expected the roaming to find my cisco router-wifi and stablish a connection, but instead, it is as if the wifi card is not there at user level. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- aspire 5520 atheros wifi doesnt work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224498 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222801] Re: hardy upgrade crashes at preparing upgrade
Hi. I can reproduce the exact same problem (running Ubuntu on a PowerPC). So, in case you need more traces from a different system, just let me know. -- hardy upgrade crashes at preparing upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222801 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 237965] [NEW] package update-manager 1:0.87.27 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1), E:Sub-process /usr/b
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager I was just updating from a 7.10 CD install to 8.04 ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Jun 6 13:03:28 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1), E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Package: update-manager 1:0.87.27 PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: update-manager Title: package update-manager 1:0.87.27 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1), E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Uname: Linux 2.6.22-14-generic i686 ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package -- package update-manager 1:0.87.27 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1), E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237965 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 237965] Re: package update-manager 1:0.87.27 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1), E:Sub-process /usr/bin
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15089121/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15089123/VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15089124/VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15089125/VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15089126/VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz -- package update-manager 1:0.87.27 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1), E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237965 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 232081] Re: Update Manager cannot install the upgrades in my initramfs
Ok, I'll attach the files. I fixed the problem by running sudo update-initramfs. It worked fine. I'm pretty sure I didn't hit Ctrl-C while this was running; I don't think I had my hands on the keyboard, even. I've added everything in /var/log/dist-upgrade. ** Attachment added: dist-upgrade.zip http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15153487/dist-upgrade.zip -- Update Manager cannot install the upgrades in my initramfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/232081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 237965] Re: CD upgrade fails (bad burn?)
I'll run a CD check; however, it would surprise me because this disc was pressed by Canonical and mailed to me. Check finished: no errors found I guess to fix the problem I'd uninstall the xfonts-100dpi package and reinstall it? -- CD upgrade fails (bad burn?) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237965 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 238646] [NEW] nvidia-glx drivers hang Ubuntu 7.10 machine on startup
Public bug reported: I have an Asus machine that's about 4-5 years old. It has an integrated Nvidia graphics card for which I need the restricted drivers to enable stuff like Compiz. I installed them and rebooted the machine. It hung on restart after the Ubuntu splash screen/progress bar thingy went away. I've upgraded to 8.04, but haven't tested the restricted drivers because I had to reinstall Ubuntu to fix the situation last time (thank God it was a fresh install!). ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- nvidia-glx drivers hang Ubuntu 7.10 machine on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238646 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 238646] Re: nvidia-glx drivers hang Ubuntu 7.10 machine on startup
Derek, thanks for letting me know what to do--I didn't really know what to say. I've tarred and gzipped the files for you. ** Attachment added: nvidia-glx.tar.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15164961/nvidia-glx.tar.gz -- nvidia-glx drivers hang Ubuntu 7.10 machine on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238646 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 31743] Re: splash makes grub menu invisible
I'm using gutsy with a VGA compatible controller: S3 Inc. VT8375 [ProSavage8 KM266/KL266] and I still have this problem. I had to change these lines on /boot/grub/menu.lst: defoptions=quiet splash kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.22-14-generic root=UUID=839a578a-1072-4988-9fc2-3c089b63efab ro quiet splash to defoptions=nosplash kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.22-14-generic root=UUID=839a578a-1072-4988-9fc2-3c089b63efab ro nosplash -- splash makes grub menu invisible https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/31743 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 232081] [NEW] Update Manager cannot install the upgrades in my initramfs
Public bug reported: First off, the setting: Dell box, Celeron 1.0 GHZ, 256 MB ram, 8GB hard drive running Ubuntu Server 7.10 mainly running Apache to serve a few small sites. Tried to upgrade to 8.04 by running do-release-upgrade from update- manager-core. All the packages were up-to-date 7.10 packages (I had just run apt-get update and apt-get upgrade). It downloaded all the files and ran through and installed everything until it gets to initramfs-tools. It then says: Processing triggers for initramfs-tools ... update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.24-16-server dpkg: subprocess post-installation script killed by signal (Interrupt) Could not install the upgrades The upgrade aborts now. Your system could be in an unusable state. A recovery will run now (dpkg --configure -a). Please report this bug against the 'update-manager' package and include the files in /var/log/dist-upgrade/ in the bugreport. E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (2) Setting up initramfs-tools (0.85eubuntu36) ... update-initramfs: deferring update (trigger activated) Processing triggers for initramfs-tools ... update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.24-16-server ^[[13~ Could not install the upgrades The upgrade aborts now. Your system could be in an unusable state. A recovery will run now (dpkg --configure -a). Please report this bug against the 'update-manager' package and include the files in /var/log/dist-upgrade/ in the bugreport. installArchives() failed I've attached two of the three files in dist-upgrade; the third, apt- term.log, I can't attach, because I can't get it off my server using WinSCP (I get a permission denied error). If you need it, email me: LinuxMercedesATTgmailDAWTcom (I'll let you guess what my email is =]) ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Update Manager cannot install the upgrades in my initramfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/232081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 232081] Re: Update Manager cannot install the upgrades in my initramfs
** Attachment added: dist-upgrade.zip http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14612757/dist-upgrade.zip -- Update Manager cannot install the upgrades in my initramfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/232081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 93413] Re: vpnc dead peer detection disconnects immediately
Downloaded the vpnc sources and removed the 06 line as stated. I got a error trying to compile the Debian way, so I just removed the vpnc packages then just make, make install and my vpnc is now working perfectly again. I think this is pretty serious big, and seems fairly simple to fix, at least temporarily, why is it not getting done? thanks to all in the forum, -- vpnc dead peer detection disconnects immediately https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/93413 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 61235] Re: USB mass storage stops working after a while
Bad news: Jansen's solution seems to delay the problem, but not fix it for me. I got a new 500GB drive which dies when I try this: # mke2fs -c /dev/sda1 The block at which it dies depends on whether I run a kernel with Jansen's suggestion or not. With USB_EHCI_SPLIT_ISO, USB_EHCI_ROOT_HUB_IT or USB_EHCI_TT_NEWSCHED enabled and USB_BANDWITH disabled, it dies pretty soon. On the other hand, when USB_EHCI_SPLIT_ISO, USB_EHCI_ROOT_HUB_IT and USB_EHCI_TT_NEWSCHED are disabled and USB_BANDWITH is enabled, it takes as much as 10 times longer for the USB connection to die, but it dies at the end all the same. It is definitely a bug in the handling of USB controllers. I gathered some evidence that this is the case using a different machine and a 300 GB disk. I have two different generic USB enclosures. The same disk mounted on one of them works perfectly, while mounted on the other it exhibits the connection problems and eventually dies. Finally, a caveat: Creating a partition in the 500GB disk without badblock checking worked fine. I could also copy some large movie files into the disk, but when it eventually died, it killed the partition. The data in the disk was totally destroyed and I could not recover it. Maybe this is a particularly bad controller (reported as Samsung by sysfs) but the severing of the USB bus connection should never have the effect of totally destroying all the data stored in a device. Too bad. -- USB mass storage stops working after a while https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/61235 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 251543] [NEW] Firefox 3.0x crashes on specific website - www.laprensa.com.ni
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 I just upgraded to firefox 3.01 via regular updates on Ubuntu 8.04. Everything updated up to Jul 24, 2008 updates. I still get the same crash when I go to home page on http://www.laprensa.com.ni, it is almost always reproducible. It seems that occasionally it does not crash, so I am guessing it has something to do with changes on the page, but nearly every day it will crash. thanks, ** Affects: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Firefox 3.0x crashes on specific website - www.laprensa.com.ni https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251543 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 251543] Re: Firefox 3.0x crashes on specific website - www.laprensa.com.ni
Thanks, here is the list: Extensions: - dragdropupload 1.6.7 - Extension List Dumper 1.14.1 - Facebook Toolbar 1.2.1 - Fasterfox 2.0.0 (Disabled, Incompatible) - FEBE 5.3.1 (Disabled, Incompatible) - FireFTP 1.0 - FoxyProxy 2.8.4 - Full Screen 0.7 - Fullerscreen 2.3.3 (Disabled, Incompatible) - Greasemonkey 0.8.20080609.0 - Netcraft Anti-Phishing Toolbar 1.2 - StumbleUpon 3.25 - SwitchProxy Tool 1.4.1 - Ubuntu Firefox Modifications 0.5 - User Agent Switcher 0.6.11 flash: File name: libflashplayer.so Shockwave Flash 9.0 r124 java: GCJ Web Browser Plugin (using IcedTea) 1.0 File name: gcjwebplugin.so -- Firefox 3.0x crashes on specific website - www.laprensa.com.ni https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251543 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222801] Re: hardy upgrade crashes at preparing upgrade
I also confirm this. With the test2 version I've been able to complete the upgrade. Thanks! -- hardy upgrade crashes at preparing upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222801 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 228723] [NEW] package openoffice.org-writer2latex 0.5-6 failed to install/upgrade:
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: writer2latex I just performed an update from 7.10 to 8.04 and this was the only problem I found ProblemType: Package Architecture: powerpc Date: Fri May 9 08:48:56 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Package: openoffice.org-writer2latex 0.5-6 PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: writer2latex Title: package openoffice.org-writer2latex 0.5-6 failed to install/upgrade: Uname: Linux 2.6.24-16-powerpc ppc ** Affects: writer2latex (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package -- package openoffice.org-writer2latex 0.5-6 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228723 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 228723] Re: package openoffice.org-writer2latex 0.5-6 failed to install/upgrade:
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14397603/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14397604/VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14397605/VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14397606/VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14397607/VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz -- package openoffice.org-writer2latex 0.5-6 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228723 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 311146] Re: package phpmyadmin 4:2.11.8.1-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Configurando phpmyadmin (4:3.1.2-1) ... dbconfig-common: writing config to /etc/dbconfig-common/phpmyadmin.conf *** WARNING: ucf was run from a maintainer script that uses debconf, but the script did not pass --debconf-ok to ucf. The maintainer script should be fixed to not stop debconf before calling ucf, and pass it this parameter. For now, ucf will revert to using old-style, non-debconf prompting. Ugh! Please inform the package maintainer about this problem. Creating config file /etc/dbconfig-common/phpmyadmin.conf with new version Creating config file /etc/phpmyadmin/config-db.php with new version ERROR 1045 (28000): Access denied for user 'root'@'localhost' (using password: YES). unable to connect to mysql server. error encountered creating user: ERROR 1045 (28000): Access denied for user 'root'@'localhost' (using password: YES) dbconfig-common: phpmyadmin configure: aborted. dbconfig-common: flushing administrative password dpkg: error al procesar phpmyadmin (--configure): el subproceso post-installation script devolvió el código de salida de error 1 Procesando disparadores para libc6 ... ldconfig deferred processing now taking place Se encontraron errores al procesar: phpmyadmin E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -- package phpmyadmin 4:2.11.8.1-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311146 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 192457] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV
I visited today launchpad net but I didn't write anything Bye Fernando --- El jue 16-abr-09, Graeme graemegl...@gmail.com escribió: De: Graeme graemegl...@gmail.com Asunto: [Bug 192457] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV A: fernandomun...@yahoo.com Fecha: jueves, 16 abril, 2009, 2:30 am nautilus crash when I start my laptop (hp compaq nc8430). As of 15 April 2009 21h00 full updated. -- nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192457 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in “nautilus” source package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: Binary package hint: nautilus sorry im newb but i hope this will help : Jaunty 9.04 beta ( upgraded from 8.10 ) - im running firefox 3 - nautilus crashed when starting mountmanager ProblemType: Crash Architecture:amd64 Date: Sat Feb 16 19:19:08 2008 Disassembly: 0xb522aee0: DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: nautilus 1:2.21.91-0ubuntu2 PackageArchitecture: 64 ProcCmdline: nautilus --sm-config-prefix /nautilus-GBvcK5/ --sm-client-id 117f00010100012022553110193480001 --screen 0 ProcCwd: /home/chams ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=fr_FR:fr:en_GB:en PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games LANG=fr_FR SHELL=/bin/bash Signal: 11 SourcePackage: nautilus Stacktrace: #0 0xb522aee0 in ?? () #1 0xb75f9f1f in ?? () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #2 0x08b90168 in ?? () #3 0x in ?? () StacktraceTop: ?? () ?? () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 ?? () ?? () Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV Uname: Linux chams-desktop 2.6.24-8-386 #1 Thu Feb 14 20:00:28 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy fuse lpadmin netdev plugdev powerdev scanner video ¡Obtén la mejor experiencia en la web!lt; Descarga gratis el nuevo Internet Explorer 8. http://downloads.yahoo.com/ieak8/?l=e1 -- nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192457 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 251543] Re: Firefox 3.0x crashes on specific website - www.laprensa.com.ni
Martin, this issue is resolved in latest versions. thank you, -- Firefox 3.0x crashes on specific website - www.laprensa.com.ni https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251543 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 424462] Re: apt-mirror won't delete it's lock-file on exit
Eu também tive esse problema. Somente apagando manualmente o Lock o apt-mirror volta a funcionar. BORGES. -- apt-mirror won't delete it's lock-file on exit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424462 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 424462] Re: apt-mirror won't delete it's lock-file on exit
** Tags added: apt-mirror karmic ** Tags added: 187 already line running -- apt-mirror won't delete it's lock-file on exit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424462 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 475063] Re: ubuntu crashes after laptop unplug
I actually have it working now, it just took a while to boot after the crash. I still am unable to unplug or plug the laptop in during the session. It's either plugged in or it's not, if that changes the whole crash starts over again(found out today). The whole powernow-k8 thing is normal to me...It happens all the time in both computers I have Ubuntu installed on. It will show that message while shutting down, logging off, but it never affects the process of doing so. I Googled it one day out of aggravation and wasn't able to get much out of it. Oh yeah, I forgot to mention that I am running Ubuntu Karmic Koala(the powernow error happened in 9.04 also). -Fernando -- ubuntu crashes after laptop unplug https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475063 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 477104] Re: After 9.10 grub update can not boot into Wubi install
Same here... I guess that when the upgrader asked whether we wanted to overwrite the current grub2 configuration file or not we should have said YES instead of KEEP CURRENT VERSION (or something like that). I'm running grub in a second stage after rEFIt (this is an Intel MAC), and my situation is even worse because I cannot even enter the grub shell. What I can do is boot from a liveCD and access the original filesystem. I guess there is something I must do to /boot/grub/grub.conf so that it works again. Any idea ? -- After 9.10 grub update can not boot into Wubi install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477104 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 477104] Re: After 9.10 grub update can not boot into Wubi install
This is how I fixed it: 1) Boot from a Live CD 2) Reinstall grub as explained here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Grub2#Recover%20Grub%202%20via%20LiveCD Just in case the link above stops working, this is what I did: # sudo mount /dev/sda4 /mnt (/dev/sda4 is where my linux data partition -containing also /boot- can be found. The other three previous ones are OSX stuff). # sudo mount --bind /dev/ /mnt/dev # sudo chroot /mnt # upgrade-grub # grub-install /dev/sda (yes... this is /dev/sda, without the 4) Once it boots again, the update manager does not find any new grub package... so I guess this won't happen again (after all the new grub was installed, we just re-created its config file) -- After 9.10 grub update can not boot into Wubi install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477104 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 63418] Re: CPU soft lockup during bootup
ive a bit different problem..my ibm x60s does not do wifi anymore using edgy. the fn combination does not sem to tuurn on radio and kill switch message shows up.. don´t have windows installed anymore. any suggestions? running edgy with latest dist kernel and wifi used to work, but suddenly booted up and radio gone, help... -- CPU soft lockup during bootup https://launchpad.net/bugs/63418 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 71049] Re: dist-upgrading from dapper to edgy fails
Hey, In fact When I tried without the -d switch, it crashed in a way the only thing I could do back then was to reinstall the system (I don't remember the details). I removed the nvidia-glx before it, but it didn't help. Now I'm running 6.10, but I couldn't upgrade. Sorry for not answering before. On 1/4/07, John Vivirito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is this still a problem? -- dist-upgrading from dapper to edgy fails https://launchpad.net/bugs/71049 -- dist-upgrading from dapper to edgy fails https://launchpad.net/bugs/71049 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 423883] [NEW] arpalert: [./capture.c 232] pcap_open_live error: eth0: That device is not up
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: arpalert I have this error in arpalert: arpalert: [./capture.c 232] pcap_open_live error: eth0: That device is not up Well, it seems that arpalert starts BEFORE the eth0 is completely up, so i decided to add the following in /etc/network/if-up.d: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 29 2009-09-03 15:08 resetear-arpalert $cat resetear-arpalert /etc/init.d/arpalert restart --- Platform Information: lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 9.04 Release:9.04 --- apt-cache policy arpalert arpalert: Instalados: 2.0.11-3 Candidato: 2.0.11-3 Tabla de versión: *** 2.0.11-3 0 500 http://ar.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/universe Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ** Affects: arpalert (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- arpalert: [./capture.c 232] pcap_open_live error: eth0: That device is not up https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423883 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 423883] Re: arpalert: [./capture.c 232] pcap_open_live error: eth0: That device is not up
I've also renamed the arpalert init script to: /etc/rc2.d/S99arpalert (S99) But in /var/log/daemon.log i still have: Sep 3 15:24:12 desktop arpalert: [./capture.c 232] pcap_open_live error: eth0: That device is not up Sep 3 15:24:15 desktop NetworkManager: info (eth0): device state change: 1 - 2 Sep 3 15:24:15 desktop NetworkManager: info (eth0): bringing up device. Sep 3 15:24:15 desktop NetworkManager: info (eth0): preparing device. Sep 3 15:24:15 desktop NetworkManager: info (eth0): deactivating device (reason: 2). Sep 3 15:24:15 desktop NetworkManager: info (eth0): carrier now ON (device state 2) Sep 3 15:24:15 desktop NetworkManager: info (eth0): device state change: 2 - 3 Sep 3 15:24:15 desktop nm-system-settings: Added default wired connection 'Auto eth0' for /org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/net_00_16_ec_0c_d2_b1 Sep 3 15:24:15 desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) starting connection 'Auto eth0' Sep 3 15:24:15 desktop NetworkManager: info (eth0): device state change: 3 - 4 Sep 3 15:24:15 desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) Stage 1 of 5 (Device Prepare) scheduled... Sep 3 15:24:15 desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) Stage 1 of 5 (Device Prepare) started... Sep 3 15:24:15 desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) Stage 2 of 5 (Device Configure) scheduled... Sep 3 15:24:15 desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) Stage 1 of 5 (Device Prepare) complete. Sep 3 15:24:15 desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) Stage 2 of 5 (Device Configure) starting... Sep 3 15:24:15 desktop NetworkManager: info (eth0): device state change: 4 - 5 Sep 3 15:24:15 desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) Stage 2 of 5 (Device Configure) successful. Sep 3 15:24:15 desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) Stage 3 of 5 (IP Configure Start) scheduled. Sep 3 15:24:15 desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) Stage 2 of 5 (Device Configure) complete. Sep 3 15:24:15 desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) Stage 3 of 5 (IP Configure Start) started... Sep 3 15:24:15 desktop NetworkManager: info (eth0): device state change: 5 - 7 Sep 3 15:24:15 desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) Beginning DHCP transaction. Sep 3 15:24:15 desktop NetworkManager: info dhclient started with pid 3517 Sep 3 15:24:15 desktop NetworkManager: info Activation (eth0) Stage 3 of 5 (IP Configure Start) complete. Sep 3 15:24:15 desktop dhclient: Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Client V3.1.1 Sep 3 15:24:15 desktop dhclient: Copyright 2004-2008 Internet Systems Consortium. Sep 3 15:24:15 desktop dhclient: All rights reserved. Sep 3 15:24:15 desktop dhclient: For info, please visit http://www.isc.org/sw/dhcp/ -- arpalert: [./capture.c 232] pcap_open_live error: eth0: That device is not up https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423883 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 423883] Re: arpalert: [./capture.c 232] pcap_open_live error: eth0: That device is not up
** Description changed: Binary package hint: arpalert I have this error in arpalert: arpalert: [./capture.c 232] pcap_open_live error: eth0: That device is not up Well, it seems that arpalert starts BEFORE the eth0 is completely up, so i decided to add the following in /etc/network/if-up.d: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 29 2009-09-03 15:08 resetear-arpalert $cat resetear-arpalert + #! /bin/sh /etc/init.d/arpalert restart + exit 0 + And it works OK! --- Platform Information: lsb_release -rd Description: Ubuntu 9.04 Release: 9.04 --- apt-cache policy arpalert arpalert: Instalados: 2.0.11-3 Candidato: 2.0.11-3 Tabla de versión: *** 2.0.11-3 0 500 http://ar.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/universe Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status -- arpalert: [./capture.c 232] pcap_open_live error: eth0: That device is not up https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423883 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 413025] [NEW] Sound fail after installed Sound Linux Driver from ASUS to my motherboard P6T Deluxe
Public bug reported: After I tried to install the SOUNDMAX sound proprietray Driver for Linux from www.asus.com to work with my motherboard socket LGA 1366 model P6T Deluxe, I got no sound from motherboard. I do not have sound in HDMI from graphic card DVI to HDMI cable connected to my HDTV. And Compiz does not work in my computer Intel Core i7 920 with graphic card Ati HD4870X2. I think Ubuntu support should focus on people that move to Linux and even with all incompatibility drivers we still stay with Linux with the hope that all drivers problems will be fixed. Of course I have dual boot with Windows Vista becouse I can not stop work to wait Linux drivers problems to be solved. At this point Drivers problems is the biggest issue in Linux like it was in Windows 15 years ago. And all these Linux command lines scares me in the same way it did 15 years ago in windows configuration. All these drivers issues made me reinstall the Linux dual boot 5 times up to now. I can not use any Canon devices (cameras, camcorders, scanners ...) with Linux becouse drivers issue. I can not use SkyStar HD2 with Linux http://www.technisat.com/indexe8ab.html?nav=PC_products,en,76-444 In my point of view Linux has the same drivers problems that Windows had 15 years ago. I keep dual boot in the hope all drivers problems will be solved so I would move to 100% Linux. The best Linux tutorial I find up to now was in youtube from Nixie Pixel http://www.youtube.com/user/NixiePixel I appreciate your attention. Best Regards. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Package: firefox-3.0 3.0.13+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 ProcEnviron: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: firefox-3.0 Uname: Linux 2.6.28-14-generic x86_64 ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug -- Sound fail after installed Sound Linux Driver from ASUS to my motherboard P6T Deluxe https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413025 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 413025] Re: Sound fail after installed Sound Linux Driver from ASUS to my motherboard P6T Deluxe
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30270605/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ExtensionSummary.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30270606/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: profiles.ini.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30270607/profiles.ini.txt -- Sound fail after installed Sound Linux Driver from ASUS to my motherboard P6T Deluxe https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413025 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
RE: [Bug 405798] Re: VCO files does not play in Ubuntu 9.04 64 bits
I appreciate your reply. I found the answer on youtube where there are good explanation from Nixie Pixel: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NT7urt5UcQgeurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fuser%2FNixiePixelfeature=player_profilepage I would like to suggest Ubuntu to improve its FAQ repository with videos on Youtube. Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 07:37:17 + From: launch...@micahscomputing.com To: fernando_sto...@hotmail.com Subject: [Bug 405798] Re: VCO files does not play in Ubuntu 9.04 64 bits Thank you for taking the time to report this issue and helping to make Ubuntu better. Examining the information you have given us, this does not appear to be a bug report so we are closing it and converting it to a question in the support tracker. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but it would make more sense to raise problems you are having in the support tracker at https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu if you are uncertain if they are bugs. For help on reporting bugs, see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs#When%20not%20to%20file%20a%20bug. ** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Converted to question: https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+question/80005 -- VCO files does not play in Ubuntu 9.04 64 bits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405798 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in “firefox-3.0” package in Ubuntu: Invalid Bug description: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 The movie player does not play VCO movies. I installed the Dragon Player but it also did not play VCO movies. I installed VLC Media Player, but got no success with VCO movies. I tried to install vco-plugins_0.3.0.orig.tar.gz VCO plugins from https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+source/vco-plugins/0.3.0-1 to play movies from DVD player in my computer, but I need help to install them. See: x...@xi-desktop:~$ cd /home/xi/Desktop/vco-plugins-0.3.0.orig x...@xi-desktop:~/Desktop/vco-plugins-0.3.0.orig$ make g++ -I. -fPIC -D_REENTRANT -Wall -O3 -c -o blvco.o blvco.cc g++ -I. -fPIC -D_REENTRANT -Wall -O3 -c -o blvco_if.o blvco_if.cc g++ -I. -fPIC -D_REENTRANT -Wall -O3 -c -o exp2ap.o exp2ap.cc g++ -shared blvco.o blvco_if.o exp2ap.o -o blvco.so x...@xi-desktop:~/Desktop/vco-plugins-0.3.0.orig$ make install /bin/cp blvco.so /usr/lib/ladspa /bin/cp: impossível criar arquivo comum `/usr/lib/ladspa': Permissão negada make: ** [install] Erro 1 x...@xi-desktop:~/Desktop/vco-plugins-0.3.0.orig$ make install /bin/cp blvco.so /usr/lib/ladspa /bin/cp: impossível criar arquivo comum `/usr/lib/ladspa': Permissão negada make: ** [install] Erro 1 ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Package: firefox-3.0 3.0.12+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 ProcEnviron: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: firefox-3.0 Uname: Linux 2.6.28-13-generic x86_64 _ Deixe suas conversas mais divertidas. Baixe agora mesmo novos emoticons. É grátis! http://specials.br.msn.com/ilovemessenger/pacotes.aspx -- VCO files does not play in Ubuntu 9.04 64 bits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405798 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 405513] Re: Firefox 3.0 slow
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29584892/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ExtensionSummary.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29584893/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: profiles.ini.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29584894/profiles.ini.txt -- Firefox 3.0 slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 405513] [NEW] Firefox 3.0 slow
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 Since I upgrade to Firefox 3.0 it become very slow, connection drops every time, it is difficult to open new tabs and new window. It become impossible to download big files like 100 MB. Every click Firefox got stuck and I need to open and close new firefox window to make the previous window go to the click I want it to do. It also looks like it got problem with flash player 10 that make it slow and does not show moving parts as fast and accurate as it should do. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Package: firefox-3.0 3.0.12+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 ProcEnviron: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: firefox-3.0 Uname: Linux 2.6.28-13-generic x86_64 ** Affects: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug -- Firefox 3.0 slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
RE: [Bug 405513] Re: Firefox 3.0 slow
Now I updated to Firefox 3.5 and problems reduced. I could download large files. Every click still got stuck but less than Firefox 3.0. And Flash Player 10 that has one square block divided by 3 areas and each area has image moving. It still mix the image areas inside the block. My motherboard has two Lan Internet Connectors RJ45. I use both connected to my router. Maybe Firefox got stuck becouse it get lost with motherboard with two connectors and Intel Core i7 with 8 cpus (4 real and 4 virtual) and ram of 12GB and Graphic Card of 2 GB ATI Radeon HD4870x2. Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:50:13 + From: fernando_sto...@hotmail.com To: fernando_sto...@hotmail.com Subject: [Bug 405513] Re: Firefox 3.0 slow ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29584892/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ExtensionSummary.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29584893/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: profiles.ini.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29584894/profiles.ini.txt -- Firefox 3.0 slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405513 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in “firefox-3.0” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 Since I upgrade to Firefox 3.0 it become very slow, connection drops every time, it is difficult to open new tabs and new window. It become impossible to download big files like 100 MB. Every click Firefox got stuck and I need to open and close new firefox window to make the previous window go to the click I want it to do. It also looks like it got problem with flash player 10 that make it slow and does not show moving parts as fast and accurate as it should do. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Package: firefox-3.0 3.0.12+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 ProcEnviron: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: firefox-3.0 Uname: Linux 2.6.28-13-generic x86_64 _ Descubra todas as novidades do novo Internet Explorer 8 http://brasil.microsoft.com.br/IE8/mergulhe/?utm_source=MSN%3BHotmailutm_medium=Taglineutm_campaign=IE8 -- Firefox 3.0 slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 405798] [NEW] VCO files does not play in Ubuntu 9.04 64 bits
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 The movie player does not play VCO movies. I installed the Dragon Player but it also did not play VCO movies. I installed VLC Media Player, but got no success with VCO movies. I tried to install vco-plugins_0.3.0.orig.tar.gz VCO plugins from https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+source/vco-plugins/0.3.0-1 to play movies from DVD player in my computer, but I need help to install them. See: x...@xi-desktop:~$ cd /home/xi/Desktop/vco-plugins-0.3.0.orig x...@xi-desktop:~/Desktop/vco-plugins-0.3.0.orig$ make g++ -I. -fPIC -D_REENTRANT -Wall -O3 -c -o blvco.o blvco.cc g++ -I. -fPIC -D_REENTRANT -Wall -O3 -c -o blvco_if.o blvco_if.cc g++ -I. -fPIC -D_REENTRANT -Wall -O3 -c -o exp2ap.o exp2ap.cc g++ -shared blvco.o blvco_if.o exp2ap.o -o blvco.so x...@xi-desktop:~/Desktop/vco-plugins-0.3.0.orig$ make install /bin/cp blvco.so /usr/lib/ladspa /bin/cp: impossível criar arquivo comum `/usr/lib/ladspa': Permissão negada make: ** [install] Erro 1 x...@xi-desktop:~/Desktop/vco-plugins-0.3.0.orig$ make install /bin/cp blvco.so /usr/lib/ladspa /bin/cp: impossível criar arquivo comum `/usr/lib/ladspa': Permissão negada make: ** [install] Erro 1 ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Package: firefox-3.0 3.0.12+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 ProcEnviron: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: firefox-3.0 Uname: Linux 2.6.28-13-generic x86_64 ** Affects: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug -- VCO files does not play in Ubuntu 9.04 64 bits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405798 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 405798] Re: VCO files does not play in Ubuntu 9.04 64 bits
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29617626/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ExtensionSummary.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29617628/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: profiles.ini.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29617629/profiles.ini.txt -- VCO files does not play in Ubuntu 9.04 64 bits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405798 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
RE: [Bug 405513] Re: Firefox 3.0 slow
See I updated Firefox from 3.0 to 3.5 in the website bellow: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/FirefoxNewVersion I clicked in the link apt:firefox-3.5 Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:49:02 + From: fernando_sto...@hotmail.com To: fernando_sto...@hotmail.com Subject: RE: [Bug 405513] Re: Firefox 3.0 slow Now I updated to Firefox 3.5 and problems reduced. I could download large files. Every click still got stuck but less than Firefox 3.0. And Flash Player 10 that has one square block divided by 3 areas and each area has image moving. It still mix the image areas inside the block. My motherboard has two Lan Internet Connectors RJ45. I use both connected to my router. Maybe Firefox got stuck becouse it get lost with motherboard with two connectors and Intel Core i7 with 8 cpus (4 real and 4 virtual) and ram of 12GB and Graphic Card of 2 GB ATI Radeon HD4870x2. Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:50:13 + From: fernando_sto...@hotmail.com To: fernando_sto...@hotmail.com Subject: [Bug 405513] Re: Firefox 3.0 slow ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29584892/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ExtensionSummary.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29584893/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: profiles.ini.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29584894/profiles.ini.txt -- Firefox 3.0 slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405513 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in “firefox-3.0” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 Since I upgrade to Firefox 3.0 it become very slow, connection drops every time, it is difficult to open new tabs and new window. It become impossible to download big files like 100 MB. Every click Firefox got stuck and I need to open and close new firefox window to make the previous window go to the click I want it to do. It also looks like it got problem with flash player 10 that make it slow and does not show moving parts as fast and accurate as it should do. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Package: firefox-3.0 3.0.12+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 ProcEnviron: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: firefox-3.0 Uname: Linux 2.6.28-13-generic x86_64 _ Descubra todas as novidades do novo Internet Explorer 8 http://brasil.microsoft.com.br/IE8/mergulhe/?utm_source=MSN%3BHotmailutm_medium=Taglineutm_campaign=IE8 -- Firefox 3.0 slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405513 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in “firefox-3.0” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 Since I upgrade to Firefox 3.0 it become very slow, connection drops every time, it is difficult to open new tabs and new window. It become impossible to download big files like 100 MB. Every click Firefox got stuck and I need to open and close new firefox window to make the previous window go to the click I want it to do. It also looks like it got problem with flash player 10 that make it slow and does not show moving parts as fast and accurate as it should do. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Package: firefox-3.0 3.0.12+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 ProcEnviron: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: firefox-3.0 Uname: Linux 2.6.28-13-generic x86_64 _ Compartilhe os momentos mais importantes da sua vida. http://www.microsoft.com/brasil/windows/windowslive/products/photos-share.aspx?tab=1 -- Firefox 3.0 slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 420614] Re: Bug on OpenOffice Calc Financial Calculator Formulas gives wrong value to Interest Rate Calc
** Attachment added: Bug on Formulas - Financial Calculator http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30941110/Bug_OpenOffice_Calc.ods ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/3094/Dependencies.txt -- Bug on OpenOffice Calc Financial Calculator Formulas gives wrong value to Interest Rate Calc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420614 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 420614] [NEW] Bug on OpenOffice Calc Financial Calculator Formulas gives wrong value to Interest Rate Calc
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org When I try to calc the interest rate from data bellow, I get wrong answer to i = -185,49% to nper = 12; fv = 0; pv = -1500; pmt = 500; type = 0; estimation = 0%. But when I change estimation from 0% to 100% I get the write answer i = 32,16%. I know that both in mathematics the data above has two solutions and both answers solve the same data problem. But, with my HP 12 C, I do not need to worry about that because it always gives me the wright answer. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Package: openoffice.org-core 1:3.0.1-9ubuntu3 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: openoffice.org Uname: Linux 2.6.28-15-generic x86_64 ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug -- Bug on OpenOffice Calc Financial Calculator Formulas gives wrong value to Interest Rate Calc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420614 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
RE: [Bug 420614] [NEW] Bug on OpenOffice Calc Financial Calculator Formulas gives wrong value to Interest Rate Calc
See other exemple attached. Financial Calculation for i with following data: nper = 1000; pv = -2000; fv = 0; pmt = 600; type = 1 and other with type = 0; estimation = 0% and estimation = 100%. Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:14:48 + From: fernando_sto...@hotmail.com To: fernando_sto...@hotmail.com Subject: [Bug 420614] [NEW] Bug on OpenOffice Calc Financial Calculator Formulas gives wrong value to Interest Rate Calc Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org When I try to calc the interest rate from data bellow, I get wrong answer to i = -185,49% to nper = 12; fv = 0; pv = -1500; pmt = 500; type = 0; estimation = 0%. But when I change estimation from 0% to 100% I get the write answer i = 32,16%. I know that both in mathematics the data above has two solutions and both answers solve the same data problem. But, with my HP 12 C, I do not need to worry about that because it always gives me the wright answer. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Package: openoffice.org-core 1:3.0.1-9ubuntu3 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: openoffice.org Uname: Linux 2.6.28-15-generic x86_64 ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug -- Bug on OpenOffice Calc Financial Calculator Formulas gives wrong value to Interest Rate Calc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420614 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in “openoffice.org” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Binary package hint: openoffice.org When I try to calc the interest rate from data bellow, I get wrong answer to i = -185,49% to nper = 12; fv = 0; pv = -1500; pmt = 500; type = 0; estimation = 0%. But when I change estimation from 0% to 100% I get the write answer i = 32,16%. I know that both in mathematics the data above has two solutions and both answers solve the same data problem. But, with my HP 12 C, I do not need to worry about that because it always gives me the wright answer. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Package: openoffice.org-core 1:3.0.1-9ubuntu3 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: openoffice.org Uname: Linux 2.6.28-15-generic x86_64 _ Deixe suas conversas mais divertidas. Baixe agora mesmo novos emoticons. É grátis! http://specials.br.msn.com/ilovemessenger/pacotes.aspx ** Attachment added: Bug_OpenOffice_Calc.ods http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30966130/Bug_OpenOffice_Calc.ods -- Bug on OpenOffice Calc Financial Calculator Formulas gives wrong value to Interest Rate Calc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420614 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
RE: [Bug 420614] [NEW] Bug on OpenOffice Calc Financial Calculator Formulas gives wrong value to Interest Rate Calc
See a HP12C emulator to test formulas for OpenOffice Calc http://www.epx.com.br/ctb/hp12c.php Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 12:26:32 + From: fernando_sto...@hotmail.com To: fernando_sto...@hotmail.com Subject: RE: [Bug 420614] [NEW] Bug on OpenOffice Calc Financial Calculator Formulas gives wrong value to Interest Rate Calc See other exemple attached. Financial Calculation for i with following data: nper = 1000; pv = -2000; fv = 0; pmt = 600; type = 1 and other with type = 0; estimation = 0% and estimation = 100%. Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:14:48 + From: fernando_sto...@hotmail.com To: fernando_sto...@hotmail.com Subject: [Bug 420614] [NEW] Bug on OpenOffice Calc Financial Calculator Formulas gives wrong value to Interest Rate Calc Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org When I try to calc the interest rate from data bellow, I get wrong answer to i = -185,49% to nper = 12; fv = 0; pv = -1500; pmt = 500; type = 0; estimation = 0%. But when I change estimation from 0% to 100% I get the write answer i = 32,16%. I know that both in mathematics the data above has two solutions and both answers solve the same data problem. But, with my HP 12 C, I do not need to worry about that because it always gives me the wright answer. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Package: openoffice.org-core 1:3.0.1-9ubuntu3 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: openoffice.org Uname: Linux 2.6.28-15-generic x86_64 ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug -- Bug on OpenOffice Calc Financial Calculator Formulas gives wrong value to Interest Rate Calc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420614 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in “openoffice.org” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Binary package hint: openoffice.org When I try to calc the interest rate from data bellow, I get wrong answer to i = -185,49% to nper = 12; fv = 0; pv = -1500; pmt = 500; type = 0; estimation = 0%. But when I change estimation from 0% to 100% I get the write answer i = 32,16%. I know that both in mathematics the data above has two solutions and both answers solve the same data problem. But, with my HP 12 C, I do not need to worry about that because it always gives me the wright answer. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Package: openoffice.org-core 1:3.0.1-9ubuntu3 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: openoffice.org Uname: Linux 2.6.28-15-generic x86_64 _ Deixe suas conversas mais divertidas. Baixe agora mesmo novos emoticons. É grátis! http://specials.br.msn.com/ilovemessenger/pacotes.aspx ** Attachment added: Bug_OpenOffice_Calc.ods http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30966130/Bug_OpenOffice_Calc.ods -- Bug on OpenOffice Calc Financial Calculator Formulas gives wrong value to Interest Rate Calc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420614 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. Status in “openoffice.org” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Binary package hint: openoffice.org When I try to calc the interest rate from data bellow, I get wrong answer to i = -185,49% to nper = 12; fv = 0; pv = -1500; pmt = 500; type = 0; estimation = 0%. But when I change estimation from 0% to 100% I get the write answer i = 32,16%. I know that both in mathematics the data above has two solutions and both answers solve the same data problem. But, with my HP 12 C, I do not need to worry about that because it always gives me the wright answer. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Package: openoffice.org-core 1:3.0.1-9ubuntu3 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: openoffice.org Uname: Linux 2.6.28-15-generic x86_64 _ Conheça os novos produtos Windows Live! Clique aqui. http://www.windowslive.com.br -- Bug on OpenOffice Calc Financial Calculator Formulas gives wrong value to Interest Rate Calc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420614 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 414145] Re: my display driver is SIS Mirage 3+
This video woring fine on any Windows versions, but nothing make to this working fine on 2D (we hope so mutch for 3D !!) on all this kind of graphics adaper. He on Brazil have many noebook manufactors that use this adapter, I whant to back to user Ubuntu normaly. -- my display driver is SIS Mirage 3+ https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414145 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 408633] [NEW] COMPIZ DOES NOT WORK on Ubuntu 9.04 64 Bits and ATI HD4870X2
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 COMPIZ does not work at all for me and for a lot of people related same problem on youtube. When I try to enable visual effects, I receive the message the system does not support any visual effects. My computer has HD4870x2 but when I try to install the proprietary ATI driver 9.7 or 9.6 or 9.5 or ... I have the same problem bellow: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFzRUkQS7_U I tried EnvyNG, to follow ATI steps and got the same problem. I reinstalled Ubuntu several times when I got screen like this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFzRUkQS7_U The System has: Ubuntu 64 Bits version 9.04 Motherboard Asus P6T Deluxe CPU Intel Core i7 920 memory Corsair 6Gb Graphic Card ATI Radeon 2Gb HD4870X2 Monitor HDTV Panasonic Viera 1920x1080 TC-P42G10 ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Package: firefox-3.0 3.0.12+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 ProcEnviron: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: firefox-3.0 Uname: Linux 2.6.28-14-generic x86_64 ** Affects: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug -- COMPIZ DOES NOT WORK on Ubuntu 9.04 64 Bits and ATI HD4870X2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 408633] Re: COMPIZ DOES NOT WORK on Ubuntu 9.04 64 Bits and ATI HD4870X2
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29839138/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ExtensionSummary.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29839139/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: profiles.ini.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29839140/profiles.ini.txt -- COMPIZ DOES NOT WORK on Ubuntu 9.04 64 Bits and ATI HD4870X2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 240727] Re: epiphany crash on www.meebo.com
I can reproduce it here with version 2.22.2. Openning meebo yields the following crash message: ** Gtk:ERROR:(/build/buildd/gtk+2.0-2.12.9/gtk/gtkplug.c:182):gtk_plug_set_is_child: assertion failed: (!GTK_WIDGET (plug)-parent) Aborted Maybe people at meebo changed something again? (I'm quite sure this did not happen a few weeks ago) -- epiphany crash on www.meebo.com https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/240727 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
I still think that there is no reason to deny users the freedom to customize their desktop. For now, I suggest to allow users to put the launcher at any border of the screen and to be able to enable/disable the auto-hide function. I haven't tested Unity with multiple monitors, but I think that the global menu will also be an issue. On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Nick Vincent 668...@bugs.launchpad.netwrote: As was stated earlier there is a particular problem in the multi monitor arrangement with the secondary monitor to the left. Mark identified that this is a case that actually needs consideration, and with the removal of the classic theme as a login option in the next version this should be given some serious consideration.. -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a duplicate bug report (821156). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher Status in NULL Project: Invalid Status in Unity: Won't Fix Status in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Bug description: Please consider this a possible feature request or wishlist. Now when Unity will be default desktop for 11.04 could you please consider to add option to configure Unity launcher placement. Add simple option to lock/unlock through right-click menu and drag launcher to desired location like left/right and bottom. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/null/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- Fernando -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/null/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
I agree with all you that this decision to force people accept unity launcher at the left of the screen is an arbitrary decision and have no argument that makes me believe it was a good choice. They say that there were a research for finding the best position to the launcher, but no one has shown me this research. Let's start asking Unity developers, what is the difference between the unity launcher at the left and right corners of the screen for example? They consume the same amount of space. On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 7:11 AM, nsamedjeu 668...@bugs.launchpad.netwrote: @Mark Shuttleworth My brain just don't support having the utility function on the left of my screen. It is 4 am here, I can't sleep, I'm having headache looking at my desktop, I'm obsessed about moving the launcher on the button or on the top. Our brain isn't wired the same way, this is like forcing a right-handed guy to write with his left-hand and being confident that he will get used to it ... or make water the only legal drink since pops and beers can harm our health. WHO TOOK THESE DECISION IN AN UBUNTU(=people's allegiances and relations with each others..) WORLD? There is no way this is gonna work for me. Even windows (the whore) give you the option of placing object where you want -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a duplicate bug report (821156). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher Status in NULL Project: Invalid Status in Unity: Won't Fix Status in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Bug description: Please consider this a possible feature request or wishlist. Now when Unity will be default desktop for 11.04 could you please consider to add option to configure Unity launcher placement. Add simple option to lock/unlock through right-click menu and drag launcher to desired location like left/right and bottom. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/null/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- Fernando -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/null/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 864621] [NEW] package tzdata 2011j-0ubuntu0.11.04 failed to install/upgrade: sub-processo script post-installation instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 128
Public bug reported: . ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: tzdata 2011j-0ubuntu0.11.04 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Sep 28 01:00:50 2011 ErrorMessage: sub-processo script post-installation instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 128 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Release amd64 (20110427.1) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: tzdata Title: package tzdata 2011j-0ubuntu0.11.04 failed to install/upgrade: sub-processo script post-installation instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 128 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: tzdata (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/864621 Title: package tzdata 2011j-0ubuntu0.11.04 failed to install/upgrade: sub- processo script post-installation instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 128 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/864621/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 864621] Re: package tzdata 2011j-0ubuntu0.11.04 failed to install/upgrade: sub-processo script post-installation instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 128
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/864621 Title: package tzdata 2011j-0ubuntu0.11.04 failed to install/upgrade: sub- processo script post-installation instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 128 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/864621/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
all of these issues.. I'm sorry Mark, I can't recommend Ubuntu anymore..windows now has a more reliable UI. -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a duplicate bug report (821156). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher Status in NULL Project: Invalid Status in Unity: Won't Fix Status in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Bug description: Please consider this a possible feature request or wishlist. Now when Unity will be default desktop for 11.04 could you please consider to add option to configure Unity launcher placement. Add simple option to lock/unlock through right-click menu and drag launcher to desired location like left/right and bottom. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/null/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- Fernando -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/null/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 875461] Re: package linux-image-3.0.0-12-generic 3.0.0-12.20 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875461 Title: package linux-image-3.0.0-12-generic 3.0.0-12.20 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/875461/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 875461] [NEW] package linux-image-3.0.0-12-generic 3.0.0-12.20 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Upgrade to Ubuntu 11.10 failed because of linux-image not installing correctly. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: linux-image-3.0.0-12-generic 3.0.0-12.20 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-11.50-generic-pae 2.6.38.8 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-11-generic-pae i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.23. ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu3 Architecture: i386 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: mentus 2243 F pulseaudio CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'NVidia'/'HDA NVidia at 0xfe024000 irq 22' Mixer name : 'Realtek ALC1200' Components : 'HDA:10ec0888,103c2a61,00100101' Controls : 41 Simple ctrls : 23 Date: Sun Oct 16 01:14:37 2011 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=5c4f705d-3238-4f45-9bad-3d8463996503 IwConfig: lono wireless extensions. eth0 no wireless extensions. MachineType: HP-Pavilion GX672AA-AC4 a6310br ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.38-11-generic-pae root=UUID=c50a8a40-8839-42c7-98d7-d1a172d7707a ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 PulseSinks: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list-sinks'] failed with exit code 1: No PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon. PulseSources: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list-sources'] failed with exit code 1: No PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon. RelatedPackageVersions: grub-pc 1.99-12ubuntu5 RfKill: SourcePackage: linux Title: package linux-image-3.0.0-12-generic 3.0.0-12.20 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2011-10-16 (0 days ago) dmi.bios.date: 01/03/2008 dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies, LTD dmi.bios.version: 5.22 dmi.board.name: Nettle2 dmi.board.vendor: ECS dmi.board.version: 1.0 dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologies,LTD:bvr5.22:bd01/03/2008:svnHP-Pavilion:pnGX672AA-AC4a6310br:pvr:rvnECS:rnNettle2:rvr1.0:cvnHewlett-Packard:ct3:cvr: dmi.product.name: GX672AA-AC4 a6310br dmi.sys.vendor: HP-Pavilion ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 oneiric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875461 Title: package linux-image-3.0.0-12-generic 3.0.0-12.20 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/875461/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 875461] Re: package linux-image-3.0.0-12-generic 3.0.0-12.20 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Couldn't test it against the new development version, but in spite of the error, after a “dpkg –reconfigure -a” and much praying Ubuntu booted with the new kernel. Thanks for the prompt reply. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875461 Title: package linux-image-3.0.0-12-generic 3.0.0-12.20 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/875461/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 968042] [NEW] package ca-certificates-java 20110912ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Occurred during a regular do-release-upgrade from 11.04 to 11.10 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: ca-certificates-java 20110912ubuntu3.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-11.50-generic 2.6.38.8 Uname: Linux 2.6.38.8-ondemand x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4 Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Mar 29 02:39:51 2012 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: ca-certificates-java Title: package ca-certificates-java 20110912ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2012-03-29 (0 days ago) ** Affects: ca-certificates-java (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package oneiric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968042 Title: package ca-certificates-java 20110912ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ca-certificates-java/+bug/968042/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 968042] Re: package ca-certificates-java 20110912ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968042 Title: package ca-certificates-java 20110912ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ca-certificates-java/+bug/968042/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 968461] [NEW] ghc6-doc packages held back on upgrade from 11.04 to 11.10
Public bug reported: These packages should upgrade along with the libraries: ghc6-doc libghc6 -mtl-doc libghc6-x11-doc libghc6-x11-xft-doc libghc6-xmonad-contrib-doc libghc6-xmonad-doc ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968461 Title: ghc6-doc packages held back on upgrade from 11.04 to 11.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/968461/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 906672] Re: HP EliteBook 2540p fails to boot after upgrade to linux 3.0.0-15
Same problem here on a Dell Latitude E6510 after 3.0.0-14 - 3.0.0-15 upgrade. Laptop screen is not working anymore, but external screen is still working. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/906672 Title: HP EliteBook 2540p fails to boot after upgrade to linux 3.0.0-15 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/906672/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
I think that people unhappy with these new user interfaces, should opt to try Xubuntu. I've made this decision after trying Unity and seeing that isn't an user interface that helps users be productive. It gets in the way of everybody that tries to use it. After many complaints, and discussions, I see that we must apart way from this, and don't lose our efforts to try to change this situation, because it will never be changed. For anyone seeking an (another of many that were already published) article about this situation, I've just read this from Linux Journal: http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/goodbye-gnome-2-hello-gnome-2?utm_source=feedburnerutm_medium=feedutm_campaign=Feed%3A+linuxjournalcom+%28Linux+Journal+-+The+Original+Magazine+of+the+Linux+Community%29 Xubuntu gives users an desktop environment that resembles our Gnome 2 that we were productive and happy. I'm not against changes, but Unity, actually, don't let me find my working windows, and the bar on the left always appears when I really don't want them to appear. Since we can't customize the desktop, the only solution is to install another environment. I don't know why, but Unity everytime makes me remind the slogan defective by design, even it being opensource and drm-free. On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Tal Liron 668...@bugs.launchpad.netwrote: I found some information about planned multi-monitor support in 12.04, and how it would impact the Launcher. The bottom line is that the Unity team is dead serious about not making the Launcher movable. So, how are they going to solve the current bugs? By having the Launcher on all monitors! The implication is that you would always want auto-hide turned on, otherwise you will be wasting space on all your monitors, not to mention having a very confusing experience seeing multiple Launchers at the same time. And this bizarre setup, with an increasingly complex auto-hide/edge- detection heuristic, is supposed to involve less work than simply having a single Launcher which the user can place on any edge of any monitor? What do you think? The document is here: http://design.canonical.com/the-toolkit/unity-multi-monitor- interactions/ The relevant text from section 2.6: The Launcher is now available on all displays. Each Launcher contains the same set of application icons, showing both pinned and running applications. The same unfilled indicator arrow, used to identify applications which have all of their windows on a different workspace, is also used to identify applications which have all of their windows on a different display. Otherwise, filled indicator arrows are used, to show whether the application has one, two, or three-or-more windows on the current display. The behaviour upon clicking Launcher icons remains the same as in 12.04. Where the Auto-hide behaviour is specified (this is the default behaviour and can be changed from System Settings-User Interface), the Launcher will be shown whilst it does not obscure any windows, otherwise it is hidden and revealed by targeting the left edge of the display. When targeting a Launcher, the mouse cursor is held briefly at the left- edge of a display (as it passes from right to left across display boundaries), to make it possible to target the Launcher in Auto-hide mode. -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a duplicate bug report (821156). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher Status in Ayatana Design: Won't Fix Status in Unity: Won't Fix Status in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Bug description: Please consider this a possible feature request or wishlist. Now when Unity will be default desktop for 11.04 could you please consider to add option to configure Unity launcher placement. Add simple option to lock/unlock through right-click menu and drag launcher to desired location like left/right and bottom. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- Fernando -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
@SRoesgen Do you think that Unity movable launcher will ever be solved? That is why I had proposed another option for those people who can't install Unity on their production machines because of the launcher. If you think it is a minor problem for you, I have lots of testimonials that says that Unity has decreased people's productivity, due to launcher position and its hide and show behavior. It is very hard to quickly switch between windows on Unity. They tried to make something similar to MacOS, but they had made a bad mistake. All sorts of arguments have been made here, and people at canonical will continue to follow their initial design steps. My suggestion was based on an article from Linux Journal, and I thought it could be useful for people who are in this thread, discussing this endless problem. I don't think that the desktop environment should be a game of hide and seek or any other sort of weird behavior that it can present, but an tool to help people manage their open windows and find their applications and documents. On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Tal Liron 668...@bugs.launchpad.netwrote: @SRoesgen With 269 comments (mine is 270!), *every* aspect of this bug has been mentioned already, at least once. :) I suggest we all give it a rest. It is very clear that this bug report is not helping one bit. Mark has not budged since comment 2, and in the plans for 12.04 we see that the Unity team is prepared to go to great and bizarre lengths to make sure that the Launcher will not be movable. All we're doing by nagging is fitting in Mark's view of the community, that we are part of a minority of users who refuse to accept that their pet bug won't be fixed. This, I insist, is an error in understanding the reason for nagging: the community is in fact worried about Unity's usability and potential, and is every bit concerned about future Ubuntu users as he is. We tell our stories here, as anecdotal evidence, and provide our opinions, as longtime computer users. Come to think of it, he has not *once* come out and thanked us for posting on this bug. He sees this whole bug as a nuisance and distraction from his real work, rather than a valuable source of input from people who use Ubuntu everyday. (He has stated explicitly that he doesn't care about our opinion: he is targeting people who never used computers before, or who have barely used them.) Locking a huge, important UI element like the Launcher to a specific part of any and all displays will hurt that future. The sheer diversity of computer displays out there -- so many different sizes, resolutions, aspect ratios, viewing angles, multiple display setups, touch vs. non- touch, eInk vs. LCD, including new display technologies that we don't know about yet -- demands that Unity maintain flexibility. And then there's a diversity of users: left-handed, right-handed, speakers of right-to-left languages (like me). You want to run Unity in a car computer? Well, in your country do you driving on the left or right side of the road? There are just so many aspects to this that it seems like shooting yourself in the foot by not planning for such futures. The vision of an operating system for human beings can only work if it takes into account the diversity of humans and the diversity of their experience. Otherwise, it will be an operating system for a lucky group of human beings who happen to fit a specific mold. I have no doubt that in a year or two, Unity will have no choice but to make the Launcher movable, introducing considerable breakage and change to a bug-free product. And then all our comments on this bug will remain as archaeological evidence that perhaps the community should have been listened to. :) -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a duplicate bug report (821156). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher Status in Ayatana Design: Won't Fix Status in Unity: Won't Fix Status in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Bug description: Please consider this a possible feature request or wishlist. Now when Unity will be default desktop for 11.04 could you please consider to add option to configure Unity launcher placement. Add simple option to lock/unlock through right-click menu and drag launcher to desired location like left/right and bottom. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- Fernando -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
I agree with Alexander Wilms that I have more freedom on Mac OS and Windows user interface that I have on Unity. The way that Unity developers are treating their users, is the same way that Apple and Microsoft do to their. All my friends that uses Ubuntu, claims about Unity. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/null/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
I, personally, don't a single human being on the Earth that thinks that Unity is the best think they had found until now. If there is any research about user interfaces, please, share with us the results, papers and every other artifact of this research. Please Unity developers, don't be as ignorant as developers of Microsoft and Apple, please, hear us, it is for the sake of the Ubuntu Linux project that we are asking such a thing. I know that from time to time new user's interface must be developed, but sometimes their concepts don't match user's expectations. As I can see, Unity is not the right direction in it's current form. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/null/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
Maarten, I don't know you personally, that is what I was talking about. And another thing that wish to remember is that here, we are not ordinary users. Many people here are Computer Science students, application developers and all other sort of technical expertise. So don't think that there are only dumb people complaining. Even Linus Torvalds is unhappy with the current situation of Linux desktop. We are not here to TROLL Unity, but trying to make it better. The fact that the launcher is fixed in the left side of the screen is only a single complaint in middle of many that I hear. On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Maarten Kossen maarten.kos...@quateria.com wrote: Well, Fernando, then let me be the first then. I heavily prefer Unity over the Mac OS X and Windows 7 UIs, despite both having a movable launcher. I agree that the Unity Launcher sticking to the right isn't always perfect (like with RTL languages or with a dual screen setup with the left screen being the primary), but that's really secondary. For most users, the current launcher covers it. It's fantastic! If everything would happen based on what users would expect, there would not be much innovation... On 09/08/2011 03:05 PM, Fernando wrote: I, personally, don't a single human being on the Earth that thinks that Unity is the best think they had found until now. If there is any research about user interfaces, please, share with us the results, papers and every other artifact of this research. Please Unity developers, don't be as ignorant as developers of Microsoft and Apple, please, hear us, it is for the sake of the Ubuntu Linux project that we are asking such a thing. I know that from time to time new user's interface must be developed, but sometimes their concepts don't match user's expectations. As I can see, Unity is not the right direction in it's current form. -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a duplicate bug report (821156). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher Status in NULL Project: Invalid Status in Unity: Won't Fix Status in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Bug description: Please consider this a possible feature request or wishlist. Now when Unity will be default desktop for 11.04 could you please consider to add option to configure Unity launcher placement. Add simple option to lock/unlock through right-click menu and drag launcher to desired location like left/right and bottom. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/null/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- Fernando -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/null/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
Make the words of Magnes mines. Non-technical users (and even technical) have lots of trouble with Unity. I can say it by my own personal experience. As I can see, here this Unity adventure is a personal desire of someone and people should avoid putting their nose on it. It seems that no one will hear us and things will continue to get worst. I'm really tired about this situation. Every research of satisfaction around Unity that I have read points many design failures. I actually don't think that people in their majority are so dumb to need a complete revamp of their user interface to be able to use it properly. Until now, everybody has learned how to use Windows, MacOS, Gnome2, KDE3 and none of these users interfaces are so strange to users as Gnome3 and Unity. Ubuntu have lots of other problems that need to be adressed with top priority (like device driver support, open source applications that don't match it's proprietary counterparts, etc.). Don't think that an appealing user interface is the main reason to address bug #1. In all my years of experience with Linux, no single human being has complained with me that they had problems to use Gnome2. That is not the case here with Unity: everybody that I personally know, complains about it. A Desktop manager in it's conception is only an application to help people open windows and manage them, it is not the Enterprise Spaceship to be commanded. On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Magnes magnes...@gmail.com wrote: *In the first paragraph I meant that Unity not Ubuntu is very bad for non-technical users. -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a duplicate bug report (821156). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher Status in NULL Project: Invalid Status in Unity: Won't Fix Status in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Bug description: Please consider this a possible feature request or wishlist. Now when Unity will be default desktop for 11.04 could you please consider to add option to configure Unity launcher placement. Add simple option to lock/unlock through right-click menu and drag launcher to desired location like left/right and bottom. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/null/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- Fernando -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/null/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 805976] [NEW] package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36 bdcom-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: errore non conosciuto da me. fergro57 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36+bdcom-0ubuntu5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.33-generic 2.6.35.4 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic i686 AptOrdering: initramfs-tools: Configure bcmwl-kernel-source: Configure Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Jul 5 14:19:29 2011 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release i386 (20101007) SourcePackage: bcmwl Title: package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36+bdcom-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** Affects: bcmwl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 maverick -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805976 Title: package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36 bdcom-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/805976/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 805976] Re: package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36 bdcom-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805976 Title: package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36 bdcom-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/805976/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 805973] [NEW] package initramfs-tools 0.98.1ubuntu6 [modified: usr/sbin/update-initramfs] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: non conosco il problema. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: initramfs-tools 0.98.1ubuntu6 [modified: usr/sbin/update-initramfs] ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.33-generic 2.6.35.4 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic i686 AptOrdering: initramfs-tools: Configure bcmwl-kernel-source: Configure Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Jul 5 14:17:03 2011 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release i386 (20101007) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: initramfs-tools Title: package initramfs-tools 0.98.1ubuntu6 [modified: usr/sbin/update-initramfs] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** Affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 maverick -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805973 Title: package initramfs-tools 0.98.1ubuntu6 [modified: usr/sbin/update- initramfs] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post- installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/805973/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 805973] Re: package initramfs-tools 0.98.1ubuntu6 [modified: usr/sbin/update-initramfs] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805973 Title: package initramfs-tools 0.98.1ubuntu6 [modified: usr/sbin/update- initramfs] failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post- installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/805973/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 836013] [NEW] ZORIN OS 5 not recognizing scanner
Public bug reported: Microtek SCANMAKER 4900 not being recognized. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: simple-scan 2.32.0.1-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-11.48-generic 2.6.38.8 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-11-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Aug 28 07:37:18 2011 DriverPackageVersions: libsane 1.0.22-2ubuntu1 libsane-extras N/A hplip 3.11.1-2ubuntu2 hpoj N/A InstallationMedia: Zorin OS 5 32 bit - Release i386 MachineType: Gateway MT6705 PccardctlIdent: Socket 0: no product info available PccardctlStatus: Socket 0: no card ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US:en LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.38-11-generic root=UUID=b854aebe-5e2f-4b18-a943-0934dedee8a1 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 SimpleScanLog: SourcePackage: simple-scan UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 03/06/2007 dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies LTD dmi.bios.version: 77.10 dmi.board.vendor: Gateway dmi.board.version: 77.10 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 8 dmi.chassis.vendor: Gateway dmi.chassis.version: Rev.1 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologiesLTD:bvr77.10:bd03/06/2007:svnGateway:pnMT6705:pvr3408385R:rvnGateway:rn:rvr77.10:cvnGateway:ct8:cvrRev.1: dmi.product.name: MT6705 dmi.product.version: 3408385R dmi.sys.vendor: Gateway ** Affects: simple-scan (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug apport-lpi i386 natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836013 Title: ZORIN OS 5 not recognizing scanner To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/simple-scan/+bug/836013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 836013] Re: ZORIN OS 5 not recognizing scanner
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836013 Title: ZORIN OS 5 not recognizing scanner To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/simple-scan/+bug/836013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
There is no pro contra list, and Unity developers seems to be ignorant about this problem. They thought about a single use case and designed Unity to solve that single use case. People with other use cases and needs, must seek other desktop manager, like KDE, Gnome2, XFCE or LXDE. On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 7:31 AM, maletin 668...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: is there a 'pro contra' list? i can't find my argument: i've got a monitor on the left of the Ubuntu-VirtualMachine. i can't move the mouse to the left, because i loose focus. -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a duplicate bug report (821156). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher Status in NULL Project: Invalid Status in Unity: Won't Fix Status in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Bug description: Please consider this a possible feature request or wishlist. Now when Unity will be default desktop for 11.04 could you please consider to add option to configure Unity launcher placement. Add simple option to lock/unlock through right-click menu and drag launcher to desired location like left/right and bottom. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/null/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- Fernando -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/null/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
It seems that Mark is putting Ubuntu community aside with this Unity. The majority of users was comfortable with the older interface. I don't know why they are so ignorant with us. On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Mark Shuttleworth 668...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: ** Changed in: ayatana-design Status: New = Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a duplicate bug report (821156). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher Status in Ayatana Design: Won't Fix Status in NULL Project: Invalid Status in Unity: Won't Fix Status in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Bug description: Please consider this a possible feature request or wishlist. Now when Unity will be default desktop for 11.04 could you please consider to add option to configure Unity launcher placement. Add simple option to lock/unlock through right-click menu and drag launcher to desired location like left/right and bottom. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- Fernando -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
Have you counted how many requests to change Unity launcher position we have here? Have you read the following articles? http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=OTczOQ http://www.technewsworld.com/story/73026.html I can't find all the articles that I have read this year about how people are feeling bad with this desktop changes, in time to answer you quickly. But these are few of them, that I have found here. Unity and Gnome 3 are in the same path, so I think that this issue should apply to the second article. I wish only to remember Mark, that I'm acting on the behalf of the Ubuntu users that I represent here in my neighborhood, college and friends. They are all unhappy with Unity. It is resource hungry, inflexible and brings me many problem maintaining that. When you say, Instead of complaining, please find a constructive way to engage, or leave. you are not considering that criticizing is a way to show what is wrong. With this thought you leave us, with few options other than leave. When you write Status: New = Won't Fix this makes me think that even that I write a patch that fixes these issues and send them to you, it won't be merged, because it's not your interest to change the look and feel that you previously imagined. It is a very sad situation. Please read carefully the posts above, so you can get a better idea of what is going on. On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Mark Shuttleworth 668...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: On 28/10/11 12:01, Fernando wrote: It seems that Mark is putting Ubuntu community aside with this Unity. There are many community members who have contributed to Unity. There are many who have said they love it, and some who have said it does not work as well for them. There are lots of developers and lots of designers working to improve it. Instead of complaining, please find a constructive way to engage, or leave. The majority of users was comfortable with the older interface. Change is coming regardless, best we be ahead of that curve, don't you think? I don't know why they are so ignorant with us. Disagreeing with you is not being ignorant of your needs or thoughts. Mark -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a duplicate bug report (821156). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher Status in Ayatana Design: Won't Fix Status in NULL Project: Invalid Status in Unity: Won't Fix Status in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Bug description: Please consider this a possible feature request or wishlist. Now when Unity will be default desktop for 11.04 could you please consider to add option to configure Unity launcher placement. Add simple option to lock/unlock through right-click menu and drag launcher to desired location like left/right and bottom. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- Fernando -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
Very sad this. I would recommend Mark to get a laptop with Ubuntu installed, and start walking through the street of some capital of the world (like London, New York, São Paulo, Tokio ...) and ask people to do basic things in this and get their opinions about their experience. I'm pretty sure that people will not be comfortable with Unity, specially people that usually uses Windows. Recently I've read that Ubuntu laptops will be offered in China ( http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/10/28/dell_canonical_ubuntu_china_pcs/). Given the current situation, I'm pretty sure that it won't go further, like the past initiatives around this. The reason for that is that people gets scared about the user interface. I have lots of experience about this. I had installed Linux for many people and they, at some point accepted gnome 2 interface. When Ubuntu updated to 11.04 and Unity came as the default desktop environment, many called me that they were confused, they could find their applications menus, that bar that riding and showing is very annoying and every other sort of complaints that many of us already heard in our daily lives. What I'm saying above is not my personal opinion, because I personally can use only Open Box with a terminal and a browser and it is enough to me. But people normal people (Lawyers, Teachers, Secretaries, Doctors, Nurses, Salesman ...) can't interact with the computer in the same way as I (Computer science student). If Mark want us all to go to hell and leave him in peace, then we should consider our options. It is pretty sad this, because at some point, we all had contributed a little to bring Ubuntu to it's current stage. Now, we receive that: top down decisions that don't matches the needs of many of us. I really can't understand the advantages of Unity. I had really tried that, but I couldn't. On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Marco Biscaro marcobiscaro2...@gmail.comwrote: Em 28-10-2011 10:09, Fernando escreveu: When you write Status: New = Won't Fix this makes me think that even that I write a patch that fixes these issues and send them to you, it won't be merged, because it's not your interest to change the look and feel that you previously imagined. This is exactly what happened in bug #733349 (I've added a new option, the bug was marked as won't fix and the merge proposal was rejected). -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a duplicate bug report (821156). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher Status in Ayatana Design: Won't Fix Status in NULL Project: Invalid Status in Unity: Won't Fix Status in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Bug description: Please consider this a possible feature request or wishlist. Now when Unity will be default desktop for 11.04 could you please consider to add option to configure Unity launcher placement. Add simple option to lock/unlock through right-click menu and drag launcher to desired location like left/right and bottom. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- Fernando -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
I think that this article from ZDnet summarizes our feelings: http://www.zdnet.com/blog/perlow/why-ubuntu-1110-fills-me-with-rage/19103 On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:30 PM, DIego Ponciano 668...@bugs.launchpad.netwrote: I have marked this bug as also affects me, because of the cited annoyances in Unity. Therefore, I have been receiving notifications of the comments here. And man, it's been truly painful to watch the get the hell out leave my vision alone atitude from Mark, hence people here are not asking for change, but rather for options. That's really really really sad. =( -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a duplicate bug report (821156). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher Status in Ayatana Design: Won't Fix Status in NULL Project: Invalid Status in Unity: Won't Fix Status in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Bug description: Please consider this a possible feature request or wishlist. Now when Unity will be default desktop for 11.04 could you please consider to add option to configure Unity launcher placement. Add simple option to lock/unlock through right-click menu and drag launcher to desired location like left/right and bottom. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- Fernando -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
What we are complaining is more than Unity launcher problem. Maybe the topic could have reached out its bounds, but I think that all the complaints here are valid and marks the feelings that Unity introduction put in the hearts of it's users. There are many issues that must be addressed in order to Unity be acceptable. I wish so much that everybody read this article: http://www.zdnet.com/blog/perlow/why-ubuntu-1110-fills-me-with-rage/19103 I've just found it to be my own words. You can also consider that it I that wrote that. On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Walter Garcia-Fontes walter.gar...@upf.edu wrote: On the particular issue of not having the option to move the Unity launcher to some other part of the screen, I believe there is some sort of cognitive dissonance from everybody. For users complaining about not being able to move the launcher, I believe that if you like Unity (like myself) this is not such a big issue, the whole Unity experience cannot depend on just one single feature, the position of the launcher. And if you don't like the Unity experience as a whole you will move away despite the launcher being movable, to any of the excellent options that we have within Ubuntu or somewhere else to the free software world. On the Unity design team, I also see stubbornness. Every other application dock mechanism that I know (avant, docky, the one in MAC OS, the ones in Windows) can be placed anywhere in the screen that the user wants, and it does not seem such a difficult to implement feature that will increase development so much as to discard it, as all the other docks seem to show. -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a duplicate bug report (821156). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher Status in Ayatana Design: Won't Fix Status in NULL Project: Invalid Status in Unity: Won't Fix Status in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Bug description: Please consider this a possible feature request or wishlist. Now when Unity will be default desktop for 11.04 could you please consider to add option to configure Unity launcher placement. Add simple option to lock/unlock through right-click menu and drag launcher to desired location like left/right and bottom. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- Fernando -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
This is a very disastrous situation, because everyone is complaining that Unity have serious usability issues. I wish so much that Mark read the Jason Perlow wrote about Unity ( http://www.zdnet.com/blog/perlow/why-ubuntu-1110-fills-me-with-rage/19103). It summarizes everything we are complaining about. It is not that we are trying to destroy Ubuntu. It is the other side of the thing: we are here, investing our time to try make Ubuntu better and makes it shine once more, as the best Linux distro ever released. But if irritating little things are present on the desktop experience, people will hate Ubuntu. Think of this as if you are going to date Catherine Zeta-Jones and she is bed smelling. Despite she is a pretty beautiful woman, many people would prefer another girl that at least don't kill his nose. On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Sam Frances 668...@bugs.launchpad.netwrote: What I did not set out to found was a project which pandered to the needs of a few, at the cost to the many. Especially when the few can perfectly well help themselves, and the many cannot. If you think everyone commenting on this bug is a 'power user' or programmer etc., you are very much mistaken. I can't 'help myself' by writing a patch or anything like this. I can just about switch to another distro, as long as the installer doesn't ask me too many difficult questions. I am a normal user who got a launchpad account specifically to register my feelings about this matter. Looking back, I can see this was pointless. Still, I hear that Mint has a nice easy installer. -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a duplicate bug report (821156). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher Status in Ayatana Design: Won't Fix Status in NULL Project: Invalid Status in Unity: Won't Fix Status in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Bug description: Please consider this a possible feature request or wishlist. Now when Unity will be default desktop for 11.04 could you please consider to add option to configure Unity launcher placement. Add simple option to lock/unlock through right-click menu and drag launcher to desired location like left/right and bottom. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- Fernando -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
say, for me it is faster to work when I can go to the bottom of the screen to reach the launcher, I want to be able to place the launcher there. I am a Power User. If I want to configure the system and if I need to search the internet (or the Software Center) to find application to do this configurations, I am normally somebody who says so be it so!. BUT if those things I want to modify or configure have existed in many operating systems for many years and I usually can take them for granted, and if, additionally, some of these features are denied to me unless I fork the system or install an unsupported patch, then I have to question the sanity of the designers. We are not talking about implementing features into Unity, which have never been seen before. We are not talking about features that a group of people invented and that this group of people wants to be implemented because they came up with a strange design idea that they want see to become part of the system. Instead, we are talking about a feature that existed everywhere in every OS. A feature that will not, definitively not, break the system or the use concept of the system. It is about options. Being a power user is being about options, about configurability. It is not being about shortcuts or about using the keyboard more efficeintly. My times of using the terminal or the console are over. That can be done by script kiddies and console jockeys who like doing so. And if they have fun hacking on the keyboard that is no problem for me. I know the times of Ms Dos and of early Linux. I was really happy when I was able to stop using the keyboard extensively/intensively. I do not need this. A line of code or bash commands maybe fast. But it is never faster than a mouse click. If I have to use the shell, then I can use it. But I prefer to not do it. So now, Mr Shuttleworth, you had your answer. You have a definition of a Power User (several of them). You have a description of my workflow and needs. And my needs are those of some other people who do similar tasks. Perhaps indeed a small group of people. But I would like to hear what the rest of the users here have to say about this. Perhaps they recognized these needs as well. Perhaps they can add to this. You say you do not only want to hear demands? Ok! So, this was a description, which offered you more details in my work than I think you should need. Because I think, if I say, there is a need of a feature and if many other people says so, too. About your user tests and 20 Million Ubuntu users: Perhaps there are only 156 affects me voters against 20 Million Ubuntu users. But who else despite those 156 people has the same needs and does not voice his needs on launchpad? Additionally: you say 20 Million users of Ubuntu? Fine! But what about those 10 people you test every month. That are 120 people within a year. We got 156 affects me votes within less time than a year. So think again about the numbers you use. I, indeed, am not somebody who has no really big problem with the position of the launcher. It is the smallest problem I have with Unity at the moment. I like many of the concepts and design ideas of Unity. Those things that I do NOT like are all tied to the fact that Unity cannot be configured. For me, this bug, annoying as it is, for both our sides, serves only as an example for this unconfigurability. You want to include Power Users? Then be honest. There is NO special type of Power User. Power Users configure the system to their needs. The more configurability, the more Power Users will jump onto your train. -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a duplicate bug report (821156). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher Status in Ayatana Design: Won't Fix Status in NULL Project: Invalid Status in Unity: Won't Fix Status in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Bug description: Please consider this a possible feature request or wishlist. Now when Unity will be default desktop for 11.04 could you please consider to add option to configure Unity launcher placement. Add simple option to lock/unlock through right-click menu and drag launcher to desired location like left/right and bottom. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- Fernando -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
I think that after this all, I'm going back to the good and old terminal. 2011/10/31 Marek Paśnikowski 668...@bugs.launchpad.net Jim, GNOME is ego driven, too, I am afraid to say. They limit choice and flexibility as well. Power user really should go for KDE right now, as no other environment gives them as much power. -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a duplicate bug report (821156). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher Status in Ayatana Design: Won't Fix Status in NULL Project: Invalid Status in Unity: Won't Fix Status in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Bug description: Please consider this a possible feature request or wishlist. Now when Unity will be default desktop for 11.04 could you please consider to add option to configure Unity launcher placement. Add simple option to lock/unlock through right-click menu and drag launcher to desired location like left/right and bottom. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- Fernando -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
. But many discussions and much of my frustration could have been avoided by some simple statements to the public (or to the community). You say yourself you would prefer the launcher to be movable. So you cannot be entirely content with the system. I look at my own work and see that there are many things that I can improve. I do not applause myself because I did not make much errors today or yesterday; I simply look for those things I can improve. Real approval or praise is never uttered loudly, it is the lack of complaints. In a music concert you do not applause after every performance you can do so after everything was finished and everything found your approval. If someone needs approval or applause for the things he does, he knows he does it wrong. It is hypocritical to thank somebody for his work, though, in the same comment you state that you would prefer that something would be improved (like having a movable launcher). You thank for something which you do not really like. So please do not brown nose and please do not call anybody here a drama queen. To be critical about something and pointing out errors that is always more productive than just saying oh wonderful, that is great. Finding something great and thanking for everything never brought us forward. Do not look at those who congratulate you for your achievements, look at those who criticize, then ask yourself if the criticism is correct and if there is something which could have been better. That is the reason why we have grades at school which range from A to F. I am content with the most recent development. I certainly will not thank for this development, especially when I look back at the recent 12 month and the whole discussion in and on this launchpad page. To be content is the most honest thing I can do. Especially when looking at the mentioned OMG Ubuntu article. -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a duplicate bug report (821156). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher Status in Ayatana Design: Won't Fix Status in NULL Project: Invalid Status in Unity: Won't Fix Status in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Bug description: Please consider this a possible feature request or wishlist. Now when Unity will be default desktop for 11.04 could you please consider to add option to configure Unity launcher placement. Add simple option to lock/unlock through right-click menu and drag launcher to desired location like left/right and bottom. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- Fernando -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
Everybody wants it to be customizable. Only Canonical developers are unable to see it. That is very sad. On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:50 PM, reduz 668...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Now that It's been a year since i started using unity... I got completely used to the launcher on the left. I can use it fine, and i recognize the advantage of more usable screen space. In contrast, I couldn't get used to Gnome 3 at all. But I still don't like it and wish it was horizontal and on the bottom. -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a duplicate bug report (821156). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher Status in NULL Project: Invalid Status in Unity: Won't Fix Status in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Bug description: Please consider this a possible feature request or wishlist. Now when Unity will be default desktop for 11.04 could you please consider to add option to configure Unity launcher placement. Add simple option to lock/unlock through right-click menu and drag launcher to desired location like left/right and bottom. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/null/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- Fernando -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/null/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
What drives me crazy in this situation is that now, I'm forced to hear from people that Ubuntu is a dirty shit since the introduction of Unity. It is resource hungry, makes many PC that I won very slow and that is a very sad situation. Everything that I had done to promote Ubuntu in the last 2 years, I'm now seeing go to the trash can. On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:52 PM, reduz 668...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: @Fernando: I'd rather they get rid of the bugs first, but honestly.. Canonical devs needs to learn that 20 years of habit takes effort to change, specially when it makes you comfortable and productive, and even Apple keeps a sane level of customization on such aspects on OSX. Zero configuration only really works well for new products.. -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a duplicate bug report (821156). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher Status in NULL Project: Invalid Status in Unity: Won't Fix Status in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Bug description: Please consider this a possible feature request or wishlist. Now when Unity will be default desktop for 11.04 could you please consider to add option to configure Unity launcher placement. Add simple option to lock/unlock through right-click menu and drag launcher to desired location like left/right and bottom. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/null/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- Fernando -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/null/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 879895] Re: skype screen sharing problem when using gnome shell in ubuntu 11.10 oneiric ocelot
Hi. Im having the same issue here. Im running Ubuntu 11.10 x64 ...installed GNOME 3. Same problem: when screensharing, full screen, all windows go away (like if I was sent to another workspace). Only background shows, no windows, no gnome, no nothing. No keyboards work, super key does nothing. I have to ask the other side to close the call so I can stop and go back to a working gnome. However, if I use screensharing with only one portion of the screen, it shows, however not without issues: 1- I cannot resize the portion shown. I think this is an issue with gnome 3. I tried screensharing as well with Team Viewer and the other couldn't see my window at all. However I can see theirs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/879895 Title: skype screen sharing problem when using gnome shell in ubuntu 11.10 oneiric ocelot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/879895/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 760695] Re: Ubuntu suddenly logs-out
I have the same problem. X Server fails continuously. Every time I try to see a movie, rmvb, flv, mkv, whatever, even on Totem when I'm playing music and I try to change the sound volume. I can't see videos, every time I try to put a video on full screen, x server fails and I'm back on log in screen. So I can reproduce the bug all the time, also with vlc, if I try to maximize the window while playing a video X Server fails again. Ubuntu 11.04 stable. I log in with Ubuntu Classic. I have no graphics hardware acceleration. I installed Ubuntu on a clean partition. (over lvm partitions) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760695 Title: Ubuntu suddenly logs-out -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 760695] Re: Ubuntu suddenly logs-out
Ok, I can't make the backtrace right now (gdm, don't have a remote machine. Apport does not report a thing) It seems the X server terminates normally on an error, so I did a little of Debugging Error Exits as I read from the wiki that Bryce pointed. One log was created closing x server with vlc. The other with totem. Both with different files. The same x-server messages. My Ubuntu is the one that I described before (I must ad that it is a 32bit-Desktop) I'm attaching the logs and I don't know if this serves for something but here is the output of lspci: 00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. CN700/VN800/P4M800CE/Pro Host Bridge 00:00.1 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. CN700/VN800/P4M800CE/Pro Host Bridge 00:00.2 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. CN700/VN800/P4M800CE/Pro Host Bridge 00:00.3 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. PT890 Host Bridge 00:00.4 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. CN700/VN800/P4M800CE/Pro Host Bridge 00:00.7 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. CN700/VN800/P4M800CE/Pro Host Bridge 00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8237/VX700 PCI Bridge 00:0f.0 RAID bus controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VIA VT6420 SATA RAID Controller (rev 80) 00:0f.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT823x/A/C PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 06) 00:10.0 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 81) 00:10.1 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 81) 00:10.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 81) 00:10.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 81) 00:10.4 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB 2.0 (rev 86) 00:11.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8237 ISA bridge [KT600/K8T800/K8T890 South] 00:11.5 Multimedia audio controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8233/A/8235/8237 AC97 Audio Controller (rev 60) 00:11.6 Communication controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. AC'97 Modem Controller (rev 80) 00:12.0 Ethernet controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6102 [Rhine-II] (rev 78) 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. CN700/P4M800 Pro/P4M800 CE/VN800 [S3 UniChrome Pro] (rev 01) I wish I can do more ** Attachment added: Logs from the error output of startx, and also copied the last 3 /var/log/Xorg.x.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/760695/+attachment/2108646/+files/startx_xorg_logs.zip -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760695 Title: Ubuntu suddenly logs-out -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 668415] Re: Movement of Unity launcher
At least, there should be a way to select Ubuntu Classic as the default in the installation process, so people could be free to reject Unity. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668415 Title: Movement of Unity launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/null/+bug/668415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 715056] Re: invalid ssl-certificates in /etc/postfix/main.cf after security upgrade
/!\ W A R N I N G /!\ The last version (1:1.2.9-1ubuntu6.4) also affected us. After upgrading today (2011-06-02), it overwrote smtpd_recipient_restrictions and smtpd_sender_restrictions. The check_policy_service, check_recipient_access, reject_invalid_hostname , reject_non_fqdn_hostname , reject_non_fqdn_sender and reject_non_fqdn_recipient settings were removed, among others. :-( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/715056 Title: invalid ssl-certificates in /etc/postfix/main.cf after security upgrade -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 791984] [NEW] dovecot-postfix upgrade overwrites main.cf settings
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: dovecot-postfix /!\ W A R N I N G /!\ After upgrading today (2011-06-02), it overwrote smtpd_recipient_restrictions and smtpd_sender_restrictions. The check_policy_service, check_recipient_access, reject_invalid_hostname , reject_non_fqdn_hostname , reject_non_fqdn_sender and reject_non_fqdn_recipient settings were removed, among others. :-( ** Affects: dovecot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791984 Title: dovecot-postfix upgrade overwrites main.cf settings -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
