[Unattended] palm desktop install

2004-09-11 Thread Julien TOUCHE
i'm trying to install palm desktop on multi-users windows but get the
problem than by default palm desktop is one-user only ...
with appdeploy, i create the following scripts, but could not identify
all reg of HKEY_CURRENT_USER and other stuff i need to migrate to
HKEY_USERS/.DEFAULT or some other place.
has anyone done this previously ? anyone using palm in enterprise ?
:: OPTIONAL: Install Palm Desktop 4.1
:: http://www.palmone.com/us/support/downloads/windesk414_legal.html
:: http://www.appdeploy.com/packages/detail.asp?id=162
@echo off
todo.pl echo o|cacls \c:\Program Files\palmOne\ /E /G
\BUILTIN\Administrateurs\:F \BUILTIN\Utilisateurs\:C
todo.pl echo o|cacls \c:\Program Files\palmOne\users.dat /E /G
\BUILTIN\Administrateurs\:F \BUILTIN\Utilisateurs\
:W
todo.pl %Z%\packages\Palm\Palm41SP04\SETUP.EXE /s /v\/QB- ALLUSERS=1\
Regards
Julien
note: user perms use french names ...
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. 
Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
___
unattended-info mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info


Re: [Unattended] palm desktop install

2004-09-11 Thread Julien TOUCHE
Eugene Kotlyarov a écrit :
Julien TOUCHE wrote:
i'm trying to install palm desktop on multi-users windows but get the
problem than by default palm desktop is one-user only ...
with appdeploy, i create the following scripts, but could not identify
all reg of HKEY_CURRENT_USER and other stuff i need to migrate to
HKEY_USERS/.DEFAULT or some other place.
It's rather strange but it is under
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\U.S. Robotics\Pilot Desktop
not only that
also
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\U.S. Robotics\Palm Quick Install
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Palm
and some
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Classes\.pdb
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Classes\.pnc
and so on
but exporting these only in HKEY_USERS\.DEFAULT is not sufficient to 
make it work
or maybe it must be done individually ... (sic)

Regards
Julien

---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
___
unattended-info mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info


[Unattended] Error Code 82 - WindowsUpdates

2004-09-11 Thread Moritz Engel
Hello,

when my Unattended-Installation is going to install
Q84_WXP_SP2_x86_DEU.exe I always get the status errorcode 82 and todo.pl
stops. By searching Windows system error codes in the web I found out that
82 means The directory or file cannot be created.
Using FileMonitor: He tries to create some temporary directorys on F:. I
dont know why, there is no F:?

Any ideas?
Thanks, Moritz



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. 
Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
___
unattended-info mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info


RE: [Unattended] ACPI problems

2004-09-11 Thread Kevin Latimer
Thanks for the ideas, gents.  I reckon I'm knackered until I get some
sort of response form Acer, they've had a support call logged for a few
days now with no response so I'm just going to shift supplier.  Their
laptops have been getting on me nerves for a while now anyhow, you
should see the size of the PSUs...

Thanks agaain,

Kev

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Patrick J. LoPresti
Sent: 09 September 2004 21:50
To: Kevin Latimer
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Unattended] ACPI problems


Kevin Latimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 More a Windows XP question than an Unattended specific one, but I 
 really am hoping someone has overcome this before 'cos I really am 
 stuc.

This sounds nasty.  You might try asking on one of Microsoft's forums.

 We've been using Acer notebooks for a while and they recently changed 
 their range to include the ATi IGP9000 over the old intel 865M (or 
 whatever it was) and they just won't accept my Unattended installation

 I've been using for months.  I get to the installing drivers bit of 
 the GUI mode installer and I'm BSODed with an 0xA5 ACPI NOT SUPPORTED 
 error.  Clearly it's got to be something to do with either the IGP or 
 the updated Phoenix BIOS that supports it.

That seems likely.  The actual error is ACPI_BIOS_ERROR and you can
read about it at:

 
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/ddtools/hh/ddtools/BCCodes_88b7f
4db-e17c-44c4-ac53-73fc37945efc.xml.asp

That page also tells you how to interpret the parameters on the blue
screen.  (Not that this is likely to help.)

 If I just use Acers preloaded XP (a sysprep job) then I get an ACPI 
 Uniprocessor PC HAL.

So Acer gives you a recovery CD, but it is nothing like a normal
installation CD?  That stinks.

Maybe they are doing something like Intel does with their chipset
software.  See:

  ftp://aiedownload.intel.com/df-support/7484/ENG/readme.txt

Search for $$.  Basically, Intel has you copy some stuff to
$OEM$\$$\INF in addition to setting up the OemPnPDriversPath.  Maybe the
ATI chipset drivers can work similarly?  I don't know.

 - Pat


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. 
Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
___
unattended-info mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. 
Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
___
unattended-info mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info


Re: [Unattended] Re: PXE Automated Network Installation

2004-09-11 Thread Patrick J. LoPresti
Alexandru Savescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 ..some questions:

 [*] why would you use the unattended-4.4b/linuxboot/tftpboot instead
 of unattended-4.4b/bootdisk/tftpboot ?!?

Because the Linux boot disk usually works better, both for features
(e.g., partitioning without reboot) and for reliability.

 [*] is filename pxelinux.0 enough or must the absolute path be
 specified?! like filename /tftpboot/pxelinux.0 ???

The filename is relative to the TFTP root.  So if you invoke tftpd
with /tftpboot as the root, pxelinux.0 is sufficient.

 [*] I found the following line at
 http://syslinux.zytor.com/pxe.php#dhcp : TFTP daemon runs under
 chroot (tftp-hpa will do this if you specify the -s (secure) option;
 this is highly recommended) ..back to my question: is its use
 recommended for this purpose?!

This should not matter.  chroot is a security measure which you
might as well enable, but it should have no visible effect.

 [*] I have included the range from to declaration within the
 subnet block, see below:

 subnet 131.188.xxx.x netmask 255.255.255.0 
 {
   range 131.188.118.200 131.188.118.231;

 ..now with this configuration only hosts (pxe-clients) which get an
 IP in this range may reach the pxelinux.0 ?!? true or false?!

False.  All the range statement does is tell the DHCP server to hand
out a dynamic address to any host which requests a lease.  The TFTP
server configuration is distinct, and usually allows anonymous access,
so any host may access pxelinux.0.

The next-server and filename options tell the PXE client where to
find its boot image.

 - Pat


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. 
Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
___
unattended-info mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info


Re: [Unattended] poweredge 2400

2004-09-11 Thread Patrick J. LoPresti
Julien TOUCHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 (in french)
 le fichier fourni par le fabriquant et que le programme d'installation
 essaie d'installer essaye d'utiliser est endommagé ou n'est pas valide:
 Types de fichiers manquant ou interdits spécifiés dans la section:
 Files.SCSI.perc2
 (translate in english/partial)
 the file provided is corrupted or invalid:
 Type of files missing or banned in the following section
 Files.SCSI.perc2

I suspect the English version is actually Illegal or Missing File
Types Specified in Section Files.SCSI.Name.

 [Files.Scsi.perc2]
...
 dll = d1, perc2cin.dll
 dll = d1, perc2evt.exe

The dll lines are illegal in txtsetup.oem.  See
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=275334.

Of course, that KB article is hideous; it refers to OEMDIR and gives
some vague description of how to figure out what that is.  They say to
look at the driver's .inf file and figure out where it wants to
install the DLL.  Unfortunately, the destination directory is not
spelled out; instead, it will be a number like 11 (called a logical
directory identifier, or LDID).  This Google search should get you
started:

  http://www.google.com/search?q=ldid+destinationdirs

In my experience, you can usually just delete the dll = ... lines
from your txtsetup.oem file and ignore the OEMDIR stuff.

Have fun!

 - Pat


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
___
unattended-info mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info


[Unattended] Re: printer unable to connect

2004-09-11 Thread Mario Gzuk
you have to set some settings in the registry that user are allowed to
install printer drivers. Please take a look with gpedit.msc and look in
the printer settings in system.

mario gzuk



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. 
Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
___
unattended-info mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info


Re: [Unattended] pdfcreator patch

2004-09-11 Thread Adam Peart
At 08:12 AM 9/11/2004, you wrote:
Julien TOUCHE wrote:
could someone commit the patch part ?
I've commited it. Thanks.

What's the patch for, anyways?

---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. 
Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
___
unattended-info mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info


Re: [Unattended] pdfcreator patch

2004-09-11 Thread Julien TOUCHE

What's the patch for, anyways?
regular patch from
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=57796package_id=53473release_id=228013
at least without it, i cannot print without admin rights (but who works
on its pc with admin account ...)
Regards
Julien
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. 
Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
___
unattended-info mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-info