Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-29 Thread Richmond Mathewson

 On 29/04/2010 08:38, Randall Lee Reetz wrote:

Apple is in it for the money?  Really?  I thought they were a non-profit like 
Microsoft and Google.  Stupid me.


Yes, really! They are in the profit for it as the Linux people are also, 
only their model is different.


Nobody is in the computer business out of sheer love for humanity; there 
is always some other
motivation; and sooner or later it comes down to the fact that the 
fridge doesn't fill itself.



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-29 Thread Jeffrey Massung

On Apr 29, 2010, at 3:45 AM, Richmond Mathewson wrote:

 On 29/04/2010 08:38, Randall Lee Reetz wrote:
 Apple is in it for the money?  Really?  I thought they were a non-profit 
 like Microsoft and Google.  Stupid me.
 
 Yes, really! They are in the profit for it as the Linux people are also, only 
 their model is different.
 
 Nobody is in the computer business out of sheer love for humanity; there is 
 always some other
 motivation; and sooner or later it comes down to the fact that the fridge 
 doesn't fill itself.

Yes, but there are the occasional groups, companies, and individuals who are 
content doing something that has a social benefit 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_contract_theory). While they still are 
required to fill the fridge - and do want that ;-) - they are also fine with 
not having the funds to keep buying a new, bigger fridge every year.

Then there's always the people who really just end up loving what they do... 

Turning a profit is wonderful and necessary to keep the ball rolling, but 
usually companies that have profit as the primary bullet point on their mission 
statement isn't going to survive long-term. 

But, sadly, this is rare.

Jeff M.___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


RE: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-29 Thread Randall Lee Reetz
I was being facetious (thought that was obvious).  The level of anger voiced in 
this thread certainly exposes selfish profit centered motives.  That fact alone 
needed to be exposed before things got too obnoxious.  My bet is that mr jobs 
would love to keep the development and source as open as possible.  My bet is 
that security risks made this openness impossible.  The reputation apple 
products share is too valuable a commodity to mess with (even if that ends up 
making a few thousand xtalk old farts loose their cool). When the tantrum 
reached such a pitch that people started to deride basic economic truths I had 
to step in and play the court jester.  It is especially monstrous that a person 
would brag about how easy it is to keep malware out of windows machines.  It is 
like a coal miner standing outside a cancer ward yelling cancer happens to the 
weak.  What I really don't understand is how the rev community self justifies 
the hypocrisy of the argument that apple is doing this out of selfishness when 
the truth is that rev and all xtalk development platforms support for graphics 
and motion video is so 1980s as to erase most of the advantage of the iphone 
ipad platform.  So where does the fault really lay?  If the ipad market really 
benefited from staying open to a community that could in no way produce ipad 
worthy user experiences, than jobs would never have closed it down.  Quality 
control is a big marketing factor.  Branding is effected by the consumer 
experience at the apple store.  I must say here that the app store was designed 
for a few hundred apps and absolutely sucks at exposing tens of thousands of 
apps to the matched consumer.  It works for selling knicknacks but a lot of 
apps have matured into full work tools (and apple is still selling them in 
their bloomingdales boutique).  Jack hammers make for awkward shelf mates next 
to gold strappy pumps.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-29 Thread Jeff Massung
Sorry for missing it (tone sucks in email). ;-)


I haven't really been following any of the Steve Jobs or new iP* TOS
agreement threads, but I do need to say I agree with most everything you
stated.


I don't know when this was posted to Apple's site and if it's already been
discussed here already, but Jobs posted a letter to the community detailing
his thoughts on Flash, which can also be read into the new TOS:


www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughts-on-flash/?AID=10480621PID=3821802SID=188wkahuchtc7


Most importantly, as it likely pertains to Rev and other middle-ware
developers working with Apple on their TOS:


We know from painful experience that letting a third party layer of
software come between the platform and the developer ultimately results in
sub-standard apps and hinders the enhancement and progress of the platform.
If developers grow dependent on third party development libraries and tools,
they can only take advantage of platform enhancements if and when the third
party chooses to adopt the new features. We cannot be at the mercy of a
third party deciding if and when they will make our enhancements available
to our developers.

This becomes even worse if the third party is supplying a cross platform
development tool. The third party may not adopt enhancements from one
platform unless they are available on all of their supported platforms.
Hence developers only have access to the lowest common denominator set of
features. Again, we cannot accept an outcome where developers are blocked
from using our innovations and enhancements because they are not available
on our competitor’s platforms.

Read into it what you will.

Jeff M.


On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Randall Lee Reetz 
rand...@randallreetz.com wrote:

 I was being facetious (thought that was obvious).
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-29 Thread Richmond Mathewson

 On 29/04/2010 18:16, Randall Lee Reetz wrote:

I was being facetious (thought that was obvious).  The level of anger voiced in this 
thread certainly exposes selfish profit centered motives.  That fact alone needed to be 
exposed before things got too obnoxious.  My bet is that mr jobs would love to keep the 
development and source as open as possible.  My bet is that security risks made this 
openness impossible.  The reputation apple products share is too valuable a commodity to 
mess with (even if that ends up making a few thousand xtalk old farts loose their cool). 
When the tantrum reached such a pitch that people started to deride basic economic truths 
I had to step in and play the court jester.  It is especially monstrous that a person 
would brag about how easy it is to keep malware out of windows machines.  It is like a 
coal miner standing outside a cancer ward yelling cancer happens to the weak. 
 What I really don't understand is how the rev community self justifies the hypocrisy of 
the argument that apple is doing this out of selfishness when the truth is that rev and 
all xtalk development platforms support for graphics and motion video is so 1980s as to 
erase most of the advantage of the iphone ipad platform.  So where does the fault really 
lay?  If the ipad market really benefited from staying open to a community that could in 
no way produce ipad worthy user experiences, than jobs would never have closed it down.  
Quality control is a big marketing factor.  Branding is effected by the consumer 
experience at the apple store.  I must say here that the app store was designed for a few 
hundred apps and absolutely sucks at exposing tens of thousands of apps to the matched 
consumer.  It works for selling knicknacks but a lot of apps have matured into full work 
tools (and apple is still selling them in their bloomingdales boutique).  Jack hammers 
make for awkward shelf mates next to gold strappy pumps.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



I should like to offer my most abject apologies to all on the RunRev 
Use-List for having precipitated another

Randy Rant.

sincerely, Richmond.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-29 Thread Richmond Mathewson

 On 29/04/2010 18:26, Jeff Massung wrote:

Sorry for missing it (tone sucks in email). ;-)


I haven't really been following any of the Steve Jobs or new iP* TOS
agreement threads, but I do need to say I agree with most everything you
stated.


I don't know when this was posted to Apple's site and if it's already been
discussed here already, but Jobs posted a letter to the community detailing
his thoughts on Flash, which can also be read into the new TOS:


www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughts-on-flash/?AID=10480621PID=3821802SID=188wkahuchtc7


Most importantly, as it likely pertains to Rev and other middle-ware
developers working with Apple on their TOS:


We know from painful experience that letting a third party layer of
software come between the platform and the developer ultimately results in
sub-standard apps and hinders the enhancement and progress of the platform.
If developers grow dependent on third party development libraries and tools,
they can only take advantage of platform enhancements if and when the third
party chooses to adopt the new features. We cannot be at the mercy of a
third party deciding if and when they will make our enhancements available
to our developers.

This becomes even worse if the third party is supplying a cross platform
development tool. The third party may not adopt enhancements from one
platform unless they are available on all of their supported platforms.
Hence developers only have access to the lowest common denominator set of
features. Again, we cannot accept an outcome where developers are blocked
from using our innovations and enhancements because they are not available
on our competitor’s platforms.

Read into it what you will.



50-50 I would say; or enlightened self-interest.

However you cut it, Steve Jobs is not a raving philanthropist.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-29 Thread Richard Gaskin

Jeff Massung wrote:


Most importantly, as it likely pertains to Rev and other middle-ware
developers working with Apple on their TOS:


We know from painful experience that letting a third party layer of
software come between the platform and the developer ultimately results in
sub-standard apps and hinders the enhancement and progress of the platform.
If developers grow dependent on third party development libraries and tools,
they can only take advantage of platform enhancements if and when the third
party chooses to adopt the new features. We cannot be at the mercy of a
third party deciding if and when they will make our enhancements available
to our developers.

This becomes even worse if the third party is supplying a cross platform
development tool. The third party may not adopt enhancements from one
platform unless they are available on all of their supported platforms.
Hence developers only have access to the lowest common denominator set of
features. Again, we cannot accept an outcome where developers are blocked
from using our innovations and enhancements because they are not available
on our competitor’s platforms.

Read into it what you will.


True, most Java-based apps look pretty crappy, but that's not because 
Swing doesn't exist but merely because many Java developers are too lazy 
to use it well.


And it's also true (at least last time I used it) that Flash is almost 
entirely devoid of native-looking controls, so it's well nigh impossible 
to make truly HIG-conformant apps with it unless you carefully craft 
every control yourself.


But tools like Rev and even RealBASIC are used by people who care about 
how well their apps conform to the GUI conventions of their target 
platforms, and make a good effort to do so.


Lumping all high-level multi-platform tools together is shortsighted.

Moreover, in the vertical markets my company builds apps for, we're 
pretty much the only vendor addressing the Mac at all.  If not for the 
cost-effectiveness of multi-platform RAD tools, there would not be a Mac 
version in those categories from anyone.


Win developers simply don't bother doubling their development expense 
just to gain an additional 10% market potential.  We build on Mac 
because we enjoy it, and subsidize it with proceeds earned from our 
Windows customers.


The availability of cross-platform tools is one of the reasons the Mac 
has much software at all.  Can you imagine how few games there would be 
if game developers didn't use their own cross-platform engines?


Mr. Jobs may prefer that the world drop their plans for viability and 
write everything for OS X's 10% market share in Objective-C.  But more 
sober people realize that will happen on a timeline somewhere between 
hell freezing and pigs flying.


In the meantime, apps built for OS X with Rev look and feel a heckuva 
lot better on a Mac than Win apps running under Bootcamp.


And when one consider the cost-effectiveness of development options, 
whether he recognizes it or not that's really what he's asking for 
there: the continued marginalization of Apple's user base.


Moreover, in spite of his best efforts both desktop OSes and mobile OSes 
are becoming increasingly commoditized.  But that's a whole other thread


--
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World
 Rev training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com
 Webzine for Rev developers: http://www.revjournal.com
 revJournal blog: http://revjournal.com/blog.irv
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-29 Thread Bob Sneidar
I suspect that anyone who has to have a newer, bigger fridge every year either 
just love having a newer, bigger fridge, or didn't plan very well, and continue 
to make that mistake every year. 

We still have an original iMac (the ugliest green ever to ooze from the warped 
minds of seriously disturbed designers in the history of man) running OS 8.5.1, 
and doing exactly what we got it to do. 

Bob


On Apr 29, 2010, at 6:50 AM, Jeffrey Massung wrote:

 While they still are required to fill the fridge - and do want that ;-) - 
 they are also fine with not having the funds to keep buying a new, bigger 
 fridge every year.

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-29 Thread Richmond Mathewson

 On 29/04/2010 19:40, Bob Sneidar wrote:

I suspect that anyone who has to have a newer, bigger fridge every year either 
just love having a newer, bigger fridge, or didn't plan very well, and continue 
to make that mistake every year.

We still have an original iMac (the ugliest green ever to ooze from the warped 
minds of seriously disturbed designers in the history of man) running OS 8.5.1, 
and doing exactly what we got it to do.

Bob


I have a turquoise one of those over with Mum and Dad running OS 10.3.9 
(the computer,

not M  D) for when I visit.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-29 Thread Jeff Massung
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com
 wrote:

 Jeff Massung wrote:

  Most importantly, as it likely pertains to Rev and other middle-ware
 developers working with Apple on their TOS:


 We know from painful experience that letting a third party layer of
 software come between the platform and the developer ultimately results in
 sub-standard apps and hinders the enhancement and progress of the
 platform.
 If developers grow dependent on third party development libraries and
 tools,
 they can only take advantage of platform enhancements if and when the
 third
 party chooses to adopt the new features. We cannot be at the mercy of a
 third party deciding if and when they will make our enhancements available
 to our developers.

 This becomes even worse if the third party is supplying a cross platform
 development tool. The third party may not adopt enhancements from one
 platform unless they are available on all of their supported platforms.
 Hence developers only have access to the lowest common denominator set of
 features. Again, we cannot accept an outcome where developers are blocked
 from using our innovations and enhancements because they are not available
 on our competitor’s platforms.

 Read into it what you will.


 True, most Java-based apps look pretty crappy, but that's not because Swing
 doesn't exist but merely because many Java developers are too lazy to use it
 well.

 And it's also true (at least last time I used it) that Flash is almost
 entirely devoid of native-looking controls, so it's well nigh impossible to
 make truly HIG-conformant apps with it unless you carefully craft every
 control yourself.

 But tools like Rev and even RealBASIC are used by people who care about how
 well their apps conform to the GUI conventions of their target platforms,
 and make a good effort to do so.

 Lumping all high-level multi-platform tools together is shortsighted.


I don't think (many) people would argue those points, but they are also
completely irrelevant.

Apple (Jobs?) has already made their decision and the justification given is
one that could just as easily be applied to RevMobile.

That's all I was pointing out with the quote.

Jeff M.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-29 Thread Bob Sneidar
I think the source of whatever disagreements are being had in this thread stem 
from a tendency for people to misperceive the nature of the world they actually 
have to deal with day to day, and their ability to make any real quantum change 
in it's nature. This is driven by the seemingly inescapable sense that men 
ought to be better than this but simply aren't, coupled with their own 
inability do do much about even themselves, never mind everyone else. 

One of the reactions to this phenomenon that I see people exhibit frequently, 
is to imagine a better world, and then try to live their lives as though the 
world was more like the better one they imagine. My personal opinion is that 
this is a fools game. Usually what actually transpires, is that being unable to 
produce any real substantive change themselves, they often latch onto certain 
causes, and then pursue them to extremes which would shame all but the best of 
saints. In doing so, they cannot help to implicate and alienate a great many 
people for not doing enough toward their particular cause. The net result is 
a kind of moral finger pointing usually reserved for religious folk who say but 
don't do. 

Now apparently many people feel that Steve Jobs ought to be behaving much more 
in accordance with the benevolence and altruism that their perception of the 
world that ought to be requires, and are disappointed that he doesn't. I call 
to witness all the claims of his lack of consideration for what developers 
want claiming that instead he is simply focused on the bottom line. 

I suppose in the world that ought to be, heads of corporations would be free to 
pursue such lofty goals at will, while the masses admired him for all he 
aspired to do. But we live in the real world, not the world that ought to be, 
and in that real world, people pay Steve Jobs a lot of money. Those people 
expect him to do one particular job. That job is to make Apple as profitable, 
in the near term and in the long term, as he can possible make it. Most of the 
time he can accomplish this by accommodating as many end users and developers 
as possible, but this is not always the case. Sometimes in the world that is, 
you have to take from Peter to pay Paul. Peter's friends will undoubtedly feel 
angst at this, but then Paul's friends would feel no less angst should the 
transaction not have occurred. 

So my point here is that trying to live your live in the world that ought to 
be is fine up until the point that you begin to require of others to do the 
same. If imaging such a world motivates you to be a better person in the real 
one, excellent. We need more of you. Just know that my version of the world 
that ought to be is likely to be on may points contrary to yours. We aren't 
going to get along very well requiring each other to conform to each other's 
dreams and visions. 

Instead, we ought to resign ourselves to figuring out how the real world works, 
and then do our best to live in that world while not compromising our own 
personal principles, or encroaching on anyone else's rights or freedoms. I 
often tell starry eyed young people with hearts full of hope recently deferred, 
There is 'The World That Is' and there is 'The World That Ought To Be.' You 
can only live in 'The World That Is.' 

Bob


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-29 Thread Bob Sneidar
Yes, that was what they called it. I believe that if real Turquoise could 
speak, it would express vehement dismay for the association with the actual 
color Apple used. :-)

Bob


On Apr 29, 2010, at 9:56 AM, Richmond Mathewson wrote:

 On 29/04/2010 19:40, Bob Sneidar wrote:
 I suspect that anyone who has to have a newer, bigger fridge every year 
 either just love having a newer, bigger fridge, or didn't plan very well, 
 and continue to make that mistake every year.
 
 We still have an original iMac (the ugliest green ever to ooze from the 
 warped minds of seriously disturbed designers in the history of man) running 
 OS 8.5.1, and doing exactly what we got it to do.
 
 Bob
 
 
 I have a turquoise one of those over with Mum and Dad running OS 10.3.9 (the 
 computer,
 not M  D) for when I visit.
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-29 Thread Jerry Daniels
Really nice post, Bob. Thanks. 

Best,

Jerry Daniels

Use tRev's buy link during your free trial to get 20% off:
http://reveditor.com/tag/shouldiswitch

On Apr 29, 2010, at 12:17 PM, Bob Sneidar b...@twft.com wrote:

 I think the source of whatever disagreements are being had in this thread 
 stem from a tendency for people to misperceive the nature of the world they 
 actually have to deal with day to day, and their ability to make any real 
 quantum change in it's nature. This is driven by the seemingly inescapable 
 sense that men ought to be better than this but simply aren't, coupled with 
 their own inability do do much about even themselves, never mind everyone 
 else. 
 
 One of the reactions to this phenomenon that I see people exhibit frequently, 
 is to imagine a better world, and then try to live their lives as though the 
 world was more like the better one they imagine. My personal opinion is that 
 this is a fools game. Usually what actually transpires, is that being unable 
 to produce any real substantive change themselves, they often latch onto 
 certain causes, and then pursue them to extremes which would shame all but 
 the best of saints. In doing so, they cannot help to implicate and alienate a 
 great many people for not doing enough toward their particular cause. The 
 net result is a kind of moral finger pointing usually reserved for religious 
 folk who say but don't do. 
 
 Now apparently many people feel that Steve Jobs ought to be behaving much 
 more in accordance with the benevolence and altruism that their perception of 
 the world that ought to be requires, and are disappointed that he doesn't. 
 I call to witness all the claims of his lack of consideration for what 
 developers want claiming that instead he is simply focused on the bottom 
 line. 
 
 I suppose in the world that ought to be, heads of corporations would be free 
 to pursue such lofty goals at will, while the masses admired him for all he 
 aspired to do. But we live in the real world, not the world that ought to 
 be, and in that real world, people pay Steve Jobs a lot of money. Those 
 people expect him to do one particular job. That job is to make Apple as 
 profitable, in the near term and in the long term, as he can possible make 
 it. Most of the time he can accomplish this by accommodating as many end 
 users and developers as possible, but this is not always the case. Sometimes 
 in the world that is, you have to take from Peter to pay Paul. Peter's 
 friends will undoubtedly feel angst at this, but then Paul's friends would 
 feel no less angst should the transaction not have occurred. 
 
 So my point here is that trying to live your live in the world that ought to 
 be is fine up until the point that you begin to require of others to do the 
 same. If imaging such a world motivates you to be a better person in the real 
 one, excellent. We need more of you. Just know that my version of the world 
 that ought to be is likely to be on may points contrary to yours. We aren't 
 going to get along very well requiring each other to conform to each other's 
 dreams and visions. 
 
 Instead, we ought to resign ourselves to figuring out how the real world 
 works, and then do our best to live in that world while not compromising our 
 own personal principles, or encroaching on anyone else's rights or freedoms. 
 I often tell starry eyed young people with hearts full of hope recently 
 deferred, There is 'The World That Is' and there is 'The World That Ought To 
 Be.' You can only live in 'The World That Is.' 
 
 Bob
 
 
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-29 Thread Björnke von Gierke
It's funny to read the replies in regards to the advertisement on apples 
page. Steven knows exactly what he's doing, and getting the internet to spin in 
tune with his demands is as easy as posting a slightly warped factsheet about 
how it's not at all about power, or making a loser out of someone.

And all that just by saying We do not want anyone to have power over 
developers, happily dropping the anyone else and over OUR developers under 
the table. 

Of course cross platform tools increase the lag of uptake on new technology, 
and they always look awkward (yes, Rev does look awkward on all platforms). But 
then, they allow developers to produce one product, and get it to customers on 
several platforms, nice examples for that are quicktime, itunes or safari. In 
the end, vanilla C++ is cross platform too. 

So who is losing when one platform forbids cross platform developers? Not the 
platform, as long as it has some monopoly heft. Steven has been on the wrong 
end of that weapon quite a few times, so he'll know when to wield it 
effectively, as well as how bad the press can get, if the weapons bang is heard 
too loud.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


RE: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-29 Thread Randall Lee Reetz
Thank you...  Well said.  Finally a realist!  
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


RE: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-29 Thread Randall Lee Reetz
yes...  Apple's actual response.  Thank you.  Another realist.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-29 Thread Richmond Mathewson

 On 29/04/2010 20:17, Bob Sneidar wrote:

snip

Bob




Dear Bob,
  I am well aware how the real world works.

Knowing that doesn't stop me from imagining that it
might be a shade (just a shade) better than it is.

I also pointed out my belief that, while people do do
many, seemingly, altruistic things; more often than
not, when tummys start rumbling altruism tends to
be set aside while the plate is filled.

I am no better than the next person: having put my Devawriter Pro
on hold for 2 weeks while I interview potential kids for my
language school. It is the language school than fills the plate,
not the programming.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-29 Thread Richmond Mathewson

 On 29/04/2010 20:20, Bob Sneidar wrote:

Yes, that was what they called it. I believe that if real Turquoise could 
speak, it would express vehement dismay for the association with the actual 
color Apple used. :-)



More a virulent, vaguely polluted, tropical lagoon sort of colour.

When the original G3 iMacs came out I thought that the design was jolly
good but the colours were foul and infantile. I was extremely lucky to
get a brand new G3 second version Smoke-grey slot-loader which is
still doing sterling service, largely as a DVD and CD player, at the front
of my school.

The turquoise horror came about because my father had need of
a Mac as a backup for his Open University studies and I was offered
it for £10 in a Pawnshop in Dundee: maxed out the RAM, shoved a
40 GB hard drive in it: installed 10.3 on it when my G4 went 'up' to
10.4 and, although glacially slow when more than one App is running,
it does the trick both for Dad and me.

Everytime I see the 'beast' I just Thank the gods of rock and roll that I
didn't end up with a spotty dog . . .  :)
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-29 Thread Richmond Mathewson

 On 29/04/2010 20:33, Björnke von Gierke wrote:

snip

Of course cross platform tools increase the lag of uptake on new technology, 
and they always look awkward (yes, Rev does look awkward on all platforms). But 
then, they allow developers to produce one product, and get it to customers on 
several platforms,


I will always be grateful to RunRev (despite what I have written about 
its second-class Linux offering)
for allowing me to develop a Mac/Win tool for Sanskrit input; it took an 
awful lot of blood, sweat and tears,
and the thought of having to do that twice (i.e. once for Mac and once 
for Win) gives me the shudders.


A while back (1999) I developed something with Hypercard for Mac and 
then the whole thing all over again
for Windows using Toolbook . . . . . . never again he cries, ripping off 
his leopardskin and lolloping off into the

jungle to wrestles with a bear.

However, it would have been lovely to have managed it for Linux as well 
. . .  :)


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-29 Thread Devin Asay

On Apr 29, 2010, at 12:31 PM, Richmond Mathewson wrote:

  On 29/04/2010 20:20, Bob Sneidar wrote:
 Yes, that was what they called it. I believe that if real Turquoise could 
 speak, it would express vehement dismay for the association with the actual 
 color Apple used. :-)
 
 
 More a virulent, vaguely polluted, tropical lagoon sort of colour.

The official name of the color was Bondi Blue, supposedly named for the color 
of the water at this beach in Oz:

http://www.hempelfamily.com/bondi_to_bronti.htm

And you could even see the computer's innards under the water!

Devin

Devin Asay
Humanities Technology and Research Support Center
Brigham Young University

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-29 Thread Bob Sneidar
Right. I was supporting your point there. :-)

Bob


On Apr 29, 2010, at 11:24 AM, Richmond Mathewson wrote:

 On 29/04/2010 20:17, Bob Sneidar wrote:
 snip
 
 Bob
 
 
 
 Dear Bob,
  I am well aware how the real world works.
 
 Knowing that doesn't stop me from imagining that it
 might be a shade (just a shade) better than it is.
 
 I also pointed out my belief that, while people do do
 many, seemingly, altruistic things; more often than
 not, when tummys start rumbling altruism tends to
 be set aside while the plate is filled.
 
 I am no better than the next person: having put my Devawriter Pro
 on hold for 2 weeks while I interview potential kids for my
 language school. It is the language school than fills the plate,
 not the programming.
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-29 Thread Bob Sneidar
I actually had the opportunity (well obligation seeing I was one of the crew on 
a United States warship at the time) to visit Sydney, and being a young sailor 
who visited nude beaches every chance I could get, I spent a couple hours 
there. It was quite beautiful, even then. It may no longer be a nude beach, and 
from the photos it looks a great deal more developed than it was back then. It 
took some doing to get there. 

Now that I've come to my senses (which may not necessarily be a good thing) I 
don't visit nude beaches anymore. And given the apparent effect that entropy 
has had on my physique, I suspect those who frequent nude beaches these days 
are thankful about this turn of events. LOL! 

Bob


On Apr 29, 2010, at 11:49 AM, Devin Asay wrote:

 
 On Apr 29, 2010, at 12:31 PM, Richmond Mathewson wrote:
 
 On 29/04/2010 20:20, Bob Sneidar wrote:
 Yes, that was what they called it. I believe that if real Turquoise could 
 speak, it would express vehement dismay for the association with the actual 
 color Apple used. :-)
 
 
 More a virulent, vaguely polluted, tropical lagoon sort of colour.
 
 The official name of the color was Bondi Blue, supposedly named for the 
 color of the water at this beach in Oz:
 
 http://www.hempelfamily.com/bondi_to_bronti.htm
 
 And you could even see the computer's innards under the water!
 
 Devin
 
 Devin Asay
 Humanities Technology and Research Support Center
 Brigham Young University
 
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-29 Thread Peter Brigham MD


On Apr 29, 2010, at 1:33 PM, Björnke von Gierke wrote:

It's funny to read the replies in regards to the advertisement on  
apples page. Steven knows exactly what he's doing, and getting the  
internet to spin in tune with his demands is as easy as posting a  
slightly warped factsheet about how it's not at all about power,  
or making a loser out of someone.


And all that just by saying We do not want anyone to have power  
over developers, happily dropping the anyone else and over OUR  
developers under the table.


Of course cross platform tools increase the lag of uptake on new  
technology, and they always look awkward (yes, Rev does look awkward  
on all platforms). But then, they allow developers to produce one  
product, and get it to customers on several platforms, nice examples  
for that are quicktime, itunes or safari. In the end, vanilla C++ is  
cross platform too.


So who is losing when one platform forbids cross platform  
developers? Not the platform, as long as it has some monopoly heft.  
Steven has been on the wrong end of that weapon quite a few times,  
so he'll know when to wield it effectively, as well as how bad the  
press can get, if the weapons bang is heard too loud.

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
subscription preferences:

http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-29 Thread Peter Brigham MD
Good post. It's time to be a realist. I read Jobs' essay as laying out  
his thinking reasonably clearly, but with some slanting -- probably  
this is just the way he is, remember the reality-distortion field  
after all. In particular, I'd have a little more respect for him  
without the distortions -- eg:


What they don’t say is that almost all this video is also available  
in a more modern format, H.264, and viewable on iPhones, iPods and  
iPads. YouTube, with an estimated 40% of the web’s video, shines in an  
app bundled on all Apple mobile devices, with the iPad offering  
perhaps the best YouTube discovery and viewing experience ever. Add to  
this video  from Vimeo, Netflix, Facebook, ABC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, Fox  
News, ESPN, NPR, Time, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal,  
Sports Illustrated, People, National Geographic, and many, many  
others. iPhone, iPod and iPad users aren’t missing much video.


I just checked, and my iPhone still doesn't play any NYTimes video,  
which has been a major disappointment for me for some time now I  
can only hope that Jobs is right and that Apple's pressure towards  
(presumably) more reliable video standards will eventually induce  
outfits like the Times to provide video in a different format.  
Meanwhile, in the real world, I'm still missing out on something I  
want. I've written to the Times to request a different video format, I  
guess that's what I can do, but last I heard from my nephew, who works  
as a video producer for NYT, that any changes won't be very immediate.


-- Peter

Peter M. Brigham
pmb...@gmail.com
http://home.comcast.net/~pmbrig


On Apr 29, 2010, at 1:17 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:

I think the source of whatever disagreements are being had in this  
thread stem from a tendency for people to misperceive the nature of  
the world they actually have to deal with day to day, and their  
ability to make any real quantum change in it's nature. This is  
driven by the seemingly inescapable sense that men ought to be  
better than this but simply aren't, coupled with their own  
inability do do much about even themselves, never mind everyone else.


One of the reactions to this phenomenon that I see people exhibit  
frequently, is to imagine a better world, and then try to live their  
lives as though the world was more like the better one they imagine.  
My personal opinion is that this is a fools game. Usually what  
actually transpires, is that being unable to produce any real  
substantive change themselves, they often latch onto certain causes,  
and then pursue them to extremes which would shame all but the best  
of saints. In doing so, they cannot help to implicate and alienate a  
great many people for not doing enough toward their particular  
cause. The net result is a kind of moral finger pointing usually  
reserved for religious folk who say but don't do.


Now apparently many people feel that Steve Jobs ought to be behaving  
much more in accordance with the benevolence and altruism that their  
perception of the world that ought to be requires, and are  
disappointed that he doesn't. I call to witness all the claims of  
his lack of consideration for what developers want claiming that  
instead he is simply focused on the bottom line.


I suppose in the world that ought to be, heads of corporations would  
be free to pursue such lofty goals at will, while the masses admired  
him for all he aspired to do. But we live in the real world, not  
the world that ought to be, and in that real world, people pay  
Steve Jobs a lot of money. Those people expect him to do one  
particular job. That job is to make Apple as profitable, in the near  
term and in the long term, as he can possible make it. Most of the  
time he can accomplish this by accommodating as many end users and  
developers as possible, but this is not always the case. Sometimes  
in the world that is, you have to take from Peter to pay Paul.  
Peter's friends will undoubtedly feel angst at this, but then Paul's  
friends would feel no less angst should the transaction not have  
occurred.


So my point here is that trying to live your live in the world that  
ought to be is fine up until the point that you begin to require of  
others to do the same. If imaging such a world motivates you to be a  
better person in the real one, excellent. We need more of you. Just  
know that my version of the world that ought to be is likely to be  
on may points contrary to yours. We aren't going to get along very  
well requiring each other to conform to each other's dreams and  
visions.


Instead, we ought to resign ourselves to figuring out how the real  
world works, and then do our best to live in that world while not  
compromising our own personal principles, or encroaching on anyone  
else's rights or freedoms. I often tell starry eyed young people  
with hearts full of hope recently deferred, There is 'The World  
That Is' and there is 'The World That Ought To 

RE: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-28 Thread Alejandro Tejada

Story has a way to repeat itself.

Once upon a time I used a Mac for work and leisure.
I read MacWorld, MacUser and MacAddict and
for sure learned to love the company and the
philosophy that create the Mac way.

But then, the inconformity of Mac culture drive itself
to endless comparations of itself with Windows users.
In fact, the most detailed articles comparing Windows and
Mac OS appeared in MacWorld and MacUser.

Could you believe that i learned more about Windows
reading Macintosh magazines than many Windows users
learn reading their OS documentation? 

When i had the opportunity to sit down with a Windows user
to view his Windows PC, i knew more about the Windows GUI
than himself. All this knowledge directly from Mac magazines.

The tipping point and warning signal that i have to change
from Mac to Windows was an infamous ad with an Intel
processor on the back of a snail...

I have to thanks the Mac culture for educating me in many
computing task, like frecuent data backup, keeping organized
my files in neatly labeled folders and be careful about viruses.
(At the moment of writing this, I still have not infected any of
my computers with a virus)

Time have proved that i make the right choice when i changed
platforms and skip the whole PowerPC and complete list
of propietary interface external devices experience.

Today you could buy a Mac and, if you wish, run Windows and
Linux on the same machine using cross platform hardware
and if you are enough motivated you could do otherwise...

So, what this history teach me about iPad future?
Apple changes, and changes always in the direction
of profits.

Do you want to be 100% accurate about future Apple
developments in software and hardware? Look first at
the directions where profits are blowing.

Could you feel the breeze?... ;-)

Alejandro





-- 
View this message in context: 
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/OT-GameOver-Mr-Jobs-tp2062566p2074872.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


RE: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-28 Thread Randall Lee Reetz
Apple is in it for the money?  Really?  I thought they were a non-profit like 
Microsoft and Google.  Stupid me.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-26 Thread Bob Sneidar
GAWD you guys! Everyone loves the underdog, that is until he succeeds, and then 
he becomes Darth Vader to everyone. 

Every despot starts out at least thinking he is making the world a better 
place. But then, supposing you are the benevolent dictator, what do you do 
with all the other guys who also want to make the world a better place, but 
their idea of better is the polar opposite of yours, and they are demonstrating 
(sometimes violently) outside your office building? Well yer gonna hafta round 
em up, which is going to piss off their friends and family, who heretofore may 
not have exactly been against you, but now they sure are! So you have more and 
more people who disagree with you, so you have to do something about them now. 
Before you know it the whole country is against you, and you were only trying 
to make things better! Oh the injustice! 

I'm just glad Steve Jobs is not trying to take over the world. (Is he?)

Bob


On Apr 23, 2010, at 12:46 PM, Paul D. DeRocco wrote:

 From: Richmond Mathewson
 
  After the famous 1984 commercial by Apple it is all rather sad to see
 Steve Jobs in the role of all-knowing, all-seeing dictator.
 
 The fact that some engineers have managed to crash Android through
 the Iron Curtain has got to be good; and, I hope, will make Steve Jobs
 go for a Gorbachev rather than the North Korean option.
 
 You mean, Mikhail Gorbasteve or Kim Jobs Il?
 
 -- 
 
 Ciao,   Paul D. DeRocco
 Paulmailto:pdero...@ix.netcom.com 
 
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-26 Thread Richmond Mathewson

 On 26/04/2010 20:44, Bob Sneidar wrote:

GAWD you guys! Everyone loves the underdog, that is until he succeeds, and then 
he becomes Darth Vader to everyone.

Every despot starts out at least thinking he is making the world a better place. But 
then, supposing you are the benevolent dictator, what do you do with all the 
other guys who also want to make the world a better place, but their idea of better is 
the polar opposite of yours, and they are demonstrating (sometimes violently) outside 
your office building? Well yer gonna hafta round em up, which is going to piss off their 
friends and family, who heretofore may not have exactly been against you, but now they 
sure are! So you have more and more people who disagree with you, so you have to do 
something about them now. Before you know it the whole country is against you, and you 
were only trying to make things better! Oh the injustice!

I'm just glad Steve Jobs is not trying to take over the world. (Is he?)

Bob




Every dog has his day; then he gets rounded up by the dog pound people and
(if he's lucky) gets humanely put to sleep; because, otherwise, he gets 
too big for his

boots and h*mps all the other dogs.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-26 Thread Marian Petrides
Only the part of the world that actually INTERESTS him. ;-)

On Apr 26, 2010, at 12:56 PM, Richmond Mathewson wrote:

 I'm just glad Steve Jobs is not trying to take over the world. (Is he?)

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-26 Thread Richmond Mathewson

 On 26/04/2010 20:58, Marian Petrides wrote:

Only the part of the world that actually INTERESTS him. ;-)

On Apr 26, 2010, at 12:56 PM, Richmond Mathewson wrote:


I'm just glad Steve Jobs is not trying to take over the world. (Is he?)

Richmond Mathewson did not write the above: Bob S did.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-26 Thread Thomas McGrath III
Can we put this to sleep now??

On Apr 26, 2010, at 1:56 PM, Richmond Mathewson wrote:

 On 26/04/2010 20:44, Bob Sneidar wrote:
 GAWD you guys! Everyone loves the underdog, that is until he succeeds, and 
 then he becomes Darth Vader to everyone.
 
 Every despot starts out at least thinking he is making the world a better 
 place. But then, supposing you are the benevolent dictator, what do you do 
 with all the other guys who also want to make the world a better place, but 
 their idea of better is the polar opposite of yours, and they are 
 demonstrating (sometimes violently) outside your office building? Well yer 
 gonna hafta round em up, which is going to piss off their friends and 
 family, who heretofore may not have exactly been against you, but now they 
 sure are! So you have more and more people who disagree with you, so you 
 have to do something about them now. Before you know it the whole country is 
 against you, and you were only trying to make things better! Oh the 
 injustice!
 
 I'm just glad Steve Jobs is not trying to take over the world. (Is he?)
 
 Bob
 
 
 
 Every dog has his day; then he gets rounded up by the dog pound people and
 (if he's lucky) gets humanely put to sleep; because, otherwise, he gets too 
 big for his
 boots and h*mps all the other dogs.
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-26 Thread zryip theSlug
2010/4/26 Thomas McGrath III mcgra...@mac.com:
 Can we put this to sleep now??

Why the words sleep or sleeping are all the time back in this list.
Is it a bunch of marmots here?


-- 
-Zryip TheSlug- wish you the best! 8)
http://www.aslugontheroad.co.cc
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


RE: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-26 Thread Randall Lee Reetz
Will someone please come right out and list the ways that their own life is 
going to suck now that mr jobs excluded rev from the blessed development 
environments list?  Lets personalized this paranoia and frustration.  Like 
criss rock said, I haven't seen white people this pissed off since they 
cancelled M*A*S*H.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Bad jokes [was: Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs]

2010-04-24 Thread Kay C Lan
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 4:53 AM, J. Landman Gay jac...@hyperactivesw.comwrote:


 Next, can we do elephant jokes and dead baby jokes? I bet there are people
 here who aren't old enough to remember those. Come to think of it, I'm old
 enough to have forgotten most of them.


Your not serious are you. My kids come home from school and tell me ALL the
same jokes that we told when I was there age. I'm afraid there are no new
jokes.

Although I was surprised my kids didn't know 'what do you have if you have a
cricket ball in your left hand, and a cricket ball in your right hand?' -
probably only known by those who have suffered the cultural imposition of
the British Empire.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Bad jokes [was: Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs]

2010-04-24 Thread Sarah Reichelt
 Next, can we do elephant jokes and dead baby jokes? I bet there are people
 here who aren't old enough to remember those. Come to think of it, I'm old
 enough to have forgotten most of them.


 Your not serious are you. My kids come home from school and tell me ALL the
 same jokes that we told when I was there age. I'm afraid there are no new
 jokes.

 Although I was surprised my kids didn't know 'what do you have if you have a
 cricket ball in your left hand, and a cricket ball in your right hand?' -
 probably only known by those who have suffered the cultural imposition of
 the British Empire.


LOL! I only heard that one last week, only it was about moth balls :-)

Cheers,
Sarah
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Bad jokes [was: Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs]

2010-04-24 Thread Kay C Lan
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Sarah Reichelt sarah.reich...@gmail.comwrote:


 LOL! I only heard that one last week, only it was about moth balls :-)


 Ah yes, one the whole world can enjoy:-)
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-24 Thread Peter Brigham MD

On Apr 23, 2010, at 2:49 PM, Paul D. DeRocco wrote:


From: bar...@libero.it

Nothing is sacred!
You can now run Android and all its programmes on your iPhone!

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/04/22/android_iphone/

I probably will not be the first with this notice but I can try.


They call it duel-boot. Is that a Freudian slip, or just an  
ordinary one?


An ordinary one. A Freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean  
your mother.


-- Peter

Peter M. Brigham
pmb...@gmail.com
http://home.comcast.net/~pmbrig


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-24 Thread Jeffrey Massung

On Apr 24, 2010, at 7:42 AM, Peter Brigham MD wrote:

 They call it duel-boot. Is that a Freudian slip, or just an ordinary one?
 
 An ordinary one. A Freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean your 
 mother.

Adding to my random .sig. I actually LOL'ed when I read that. :-)

Jeff M.___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-24 Thread Richmond Mathewson

 On 24/04/2010 19:31, Jeffrey Massung wrote:

On Apr 24, 2010, at 7:42 AM, Peter Brigham MD wrote:


They call it duel-boot. Is that a Freudian slip, or just an ordinary one?

An ordinary one. A Freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean your mother.
Interestingly enough, when I was a boy, my mother actually wore a 
garment called

a slip.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Bad jokes [was: Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs]

2010-04-24 Thread Richmond Mathewson

 On 24/04/2010 00:00, François Chaplais wrote:

This one was from communist Eastern Germany.

Do you know why toilet paper is called Stalin's Revenge there?
because if can't make you heart red, it certainly makes your ass the right 
color.



I have never tried cleaning a donkey with toilet paper; I suspect if I tried
I would end up like yesterday's newspaper:

red all over . . .  :)

Oh; what does one call a Soviet submarine: big, red and full of submariners!
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


[OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-23 Thread bar...@libero.it

Nothing is sacred!
You can now run Android and all its programmes on your iPhone!

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/04/22/android_iphone/

I probably will not be the first with this notice but I can try.
Barry Barber 
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


RE: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-23 Thread Paul D. DeRocco
 From: bar...@libero.it
 
 Nothing is sacred!
 You can now run Android and all its programmes on your iPhone!
 
 http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/04/22/android_iphone/
 
 I probably will not be the first with this notice but I can try.

They call it duel-boot. Is that a Freudian slip, or just an ordinary one?

-- 

Ciao,   Paul D. DeRocco
Paulmailto:pdero...@ix.netcom.com 

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-23 Thread Richmond Mathewson

 On 23/04/2010 21:49, Paul D. DeRocco wrote:

From: bar...@libero.it

Nothing is sacred!
You can now run Android and all its programmes on your iPhone!

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/04/22/android_iphone/

I probably will not be the first with this notice but I can try.

They call it duel-boot. Is that a Freudian slip, or just an ordinary one?


 After the famous 1984 commercial by Apple it is all rather sad to see
Steve Jobs in the role of all-knowing, all-seeing dictator.

The fact that some engineers have managed to crash Android through
the Iron Curtain has got to be good; and, I hope, will make Steve Jobs
go for a Gorbachev rather than the North Korean option.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


RE: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-23 Thread Paul D. DeRocco
 From: Richmond Mathewson
 
   After the famous 1984 commercial by Apple it is all rather sad to see
 Steve Jobs in the role of all-knowing, all-seeing dictator.
 
 The fact that some engineers have managed to crash Android through
 the Iron Curtain has got to be good; and, I hope, will make Steve Jobs
 go for a Gorbachev rather than the North Korean option.

You mean, Mikhail Gorbasteve or Kim Jobs Il?

-- 

Ciao,   Paul D. DeRocco
Paulmailto:pdero...@ix.netcom.com 

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-23 Thread François Chaplais
Reminds me of an old IT joke:

Today I have manage to emulate a 4 digit calculator on my DEC-Alpha.
Tomorrow I will do the reverse.

chers,
François
Le 23 avr. 2010 à 19:12, bar...@libero.it a écrit :

 
 Nothing is sacred!
 You can now run Android and all its programmes on your iPhone!
 
 http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/04/22/android_iphone/
 
 I probably will not be the first with this notice but I can try.
 Barry Barber 
 ___
 use-revolution mailing list
 use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
 Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
 preferences:
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs

2010-04-23 Thread Colin Holgate

On Apr 23, 2010, at 4:04 PM, François Chaplais wrote:

 
 Today I have manage to emulate a 4 digit calculator on my DEC-Alpha.
 Tomorrow I will do the reverse.


A related quote about Seymour Cray:

When he was told that Apple Computer had just bought a Cray to help design the 
next Apple Macintosh, Cray commented that he had just bought a Macintosh to 
design the next Cray.


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Bad jokes [was: Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs]

2010-04-23 Thread J. Landman Gay

François Chaplais wrote:

Reminds me of an old IT joke:

Today I have manage to emulate a 4 digit calculator on my DEC-Alpha.
Tomorrow I will do the reverse.


:) Reminds me of an old soviet joke from some years ago:

Capitalism is the exploitation of one man by another. Communism is 
exactly the opposite.


Which, in turn, reminds me of yet another soviet joke:

In the Soviet Union we have freedom of speech, freedom of press, and 
freedom of association. In America, they have freedom *after* speech, 
freedom after press, and freedom after association.


--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Bad jokes [was: Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs]

2010-04-23 Thread Colin Holgate

On Apr 23, 2010, at 4:20 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:

 :) Reminds me of an old soviet joke from some years ago:
 
 Capitalism is the exploitation of one man by another. Communism is exactly 
 the opposite.


That version doesn't work quite as well as the way I heard it. In your version 
it sounds like Communism does not have any exploitation in it at all. The 
version I've heard works better as a play on words:

The difference between capitalism and communism is that in capitalism man 
exploits man and in communism it's the other way around.


___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Bad jokes [was: Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs]

2010-04-23 Thread Devin Asay

On Apr 23, 2010, at 2:20 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
 :) Reminds me of an old soviet joke from some years ago:
 
 Capitalism is the exploitation of one man by another. Communism is 
 exactly the opposite.
 
 Which, in turn, reminds me of yet another soviet joke:
 
 In the Soviet Union we have freedom of speech, freedom of press, and 
 freedom of association. In America, they have freedom *after* speech, 
 freedom after press, and freedom after association.

Ahhh! Old Soviet Union jokes!

Question: How can you tell communism is not based on science?

Answer: If it were based on science they would have tried it out on dogs first.

Devin

Devin Asay
Humanities Technology and Research Support Center
Brigham Young University

___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Bad jokes [was: Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs]

2010-04-23 Thread J. Landman Gay

Colin Holgate wrote:


That version doesn't work quite as well as the way I heard it.


You're probably right. My brain is only half here today. It's Friday.

--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Bad jokes [was: Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs]

2010-04-23 Thread J. Landman Gay

Devin Asay wrote:

On Apr 23, 2010, at 2:20 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:

:) Reminds me of an old soviet joke from some years ago:

Capitalism is the exploitation of one man by another. Communism is 
exactly the opposite.


Which, in turn, reminds me of yet another soviet joke:

In the Soviet Union we have freedom of speech, freedom of press, and 
freedom of association. In America, they have freedom *after* speech, 
freedom after press, and freedom after association.


Ahhh! Old Soviet Union jokes!


Next, can we do elephant jokes and dead baby jokes? I bet there are 
people here who aren't old enough to remember those. Come to think of 
it, I'm old enough to have forgotten most of them.


--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


Re: Bad jokes [was: Re: [OT] GameOver Mr. Jobs]

2010-04-23 Thread François Chaplais
This one was from communist Eastern Germany.

Do you know why toilet paper is called Stalin's Revenge there?
because if can't make you heart red, it certainly makes your ass the right 
color.


Le 23 avr. 2010 à 22:20, J. Landman Gay a écrit :

 :) Reminds me of an old soviet joke from some years ago:
 
 Capitalism is the exploitation of one man by another. Communism is exactly 
 the opposite.
 
 Which, in turn, reminds me of yet another soviet joke:
 
 In the Soviet Union we have freedom of speech, freedom of press, and freedom 
 of association. In America, they have freedom *after* speech, freedom after 
 press, and freedom after association.
 



___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution