Re: Deprecate and remove support for Kafka 0.9.x and older version
Agreed. We will ask users again before we will remove runtime support in a future version. No timeline yet. PR 4603 removes compile time support (i.e. can't run unit tests). Please let me know that looks good. Raghu. On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 7:40 AM, Ismaël Mejíawrote: > Agree with JB, showing deprecation is ok, but I think it is worth to > support Kafka 0.9.x for some extra time. Users tend to stay in old > data stores because migrating these clusters isn't always so easy. > > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 3:56 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > +1 to flag as deprecated, but I would wait a bit before simply removing > it. > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On 02/03/2018 01:12 AM, Raghu Angadi wrote: > >> Is anyone using Apache Beam with Kafka 0.9.x and older? > >> > >> I am thinking of deprecating 0.9.x and 0.10.0 in Beam 2.4 and remove > support in > >> 2.5 or later. 0.10.1 and up will be supported. 0.10.1+ includes much > better > >> timestamp support. > >> > >> By deprecation I mean KafkaIO would continue to work with an older > version at > >> runtime, but would not build with it (e.g. `mvn > -Dkafka.clients.version=0.9.1` > >> fails). We can print a deprecation warning at runtime. > >> > >> [1]: https://github.com/apache/kafka/commit/ > 23c69d62a0cabf06c4db8b338f0ca824dc6d81a7 > > > > -- > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > jbono...@apache.org > > http://blog.nanthrax.net > > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
Re: slack invite please!
Invite sent, welcome. On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 8:42 AM, Jeffrey Yangwrote: > > Jeffrey Yang > jeff...@spotify.com >
slack invite please!
Jeffrey Yang jeff...@spotify.com
Re: Deprecate and remove support for Kafka 0.9.x and older version
Agree with JB, showing deprecation is ok, but I think it is worth to support Kafka 0.9.x for some extra time. Users tend to stay in old data stores because migrating these clusters isn't always so easy. On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 3:56 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofréwrote: > +1 to flag as deprecated, but I would wait a bit before simply removing it. > > Regards > JB > > On 02/03/2018 01:12 AM, Raghu Angadi wrote: >> Is anyone using Apache Beam with Kafka 0.9.x and older? >> >> I am thinking of deprecating 0.9.x and 0.10.0 in Beam 2.4 and remove support >> in >> 2.5 or later. 0.10.1 and up will be supported. 0.10.1+ includes much better >> timestamp support. >> >> By deprecation I mean KafkaIO would continue to work with an older version at >> runtime, but would not build with it (e.g. `mvn >> -Dkafka.clients.version=0.9.1` >> fails). We can print a deprecation warning at runtime. >> >> [1]: >> https://github.com/apache/kafka/commit/23c69d62a0cabf06c4db8b338f0ca824dc6d81a7 > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Deprecate and remove support for Kafka 0.9.x and older version
+1 to flag as deprecated, but I would wait a bit before simply removing it. Regards JB On 02/03/2018 01:12 AM, Raghu Angadi wrote: > Is anyone using Apache Beam with Kafka 0.9.x and older? > > I am thinking of deprecating 0.9.x and 0.10.0 in Beam 2.4 and remove support > in > 2.5 or later. 0.10.1 and up will be supported. 0.10.1+ includes much better > timestamp support. > > By deprecation I mean KafkaIO would continue to work with an older version at > runtime, but would not build with it (e.g. `mvn -Dkafka.clients.version=0.9.1` > fails). We can print a deprecation warning at runtime. > > [1]: > https://github.com/apache/kafka/commit/23c69d62a0cabf06c4db8b338f0ca824dc6d81a7 -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Slack invite please
Done, you should have received an invite. Welcome aboard ! Regards JB On 02/06/2018 02:51 PM, Mark Theunissen wrote: > Hi there, could I please get an invite to the Slack channel? > > Thanks > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Slack invite please
Hi there, could I please get an invite to the Slack channel? Thanks