Agreed. We will ask users again before we will remove runtime support in a future version. No timeline yet. PR 4603 removes compile time support (i.e. can't run unit tests). Please let me know that looks good.
Raghu. On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 7:40 AM, Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com> wrote: > Agree with JB, showing deprecation is ok, but I think it is worth to > support Kafka 0.9.x for some extra time. Users tend to stay in old > data stores because migrating these clusters isn't always so easy. > > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 3:56 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > wrote: > > +1 to flag as deprecated, but I would wait a bit before simply removing > it. > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On 02/03/2018 01:12 AM, Raghu Angadi wrote: > >> Is anyone using Apache Beam with Kafka 0.9.x and older? > >> > >> I am thinking of deprecating 0.9.x and 0.10.0 in Beam 2.4 and remove > support in > >> 2.5 or later. 0.10.1 and up will be supported. 0.10.1+ includes much > better > >> timestamp support. > >> > >> By deprecation I mean KafkaIO would continue to work with an older > version at > >> runtime, but would not build with it (e.g. `mvn > -Dkafka.clients.version=0.9.1` > >> fails). We can print a deprecation warning at runtime. > >> > >> [1]: https://github.com/apache/kafka/commit/ > 23c69d62a0cabf06c4db8b338f0ca824dc6d81a7 > > > > -- > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > jbono...@apache.org > > http://blog.nanthrax.net > > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
