Re: [BeanUtils] Possible to hook in a different getter/setter naming convention?
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 8:13 PM, kennardconsulting rich...@kennardconsulting.com wrote: I was wondering if it was possible to retain this goodness whilst changing to a different getter/setter naming convention? Instead of 'getFoo()', 'setFoo(x)', I'd like to use 'foo()' and 'foo_$eq(x)' which is the native Scala naming convention. Why not annotating your Scala classes with @scala.reflect.BeanInfo so a proper BeanInfo gets generated? Regards, Michael Nascimento Santos https://genesis.dev.java.net/ https://jsr-310.dev.java.net/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
Re: [BeanUtils] Possible to hook in a different getter/setter naming convention?
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 11:13 PM, kennardconsulting rich...@kennardconsulting.com wrote: Dear All, I am enjoying using Commons BeanUtils with all its converters and 'foo.bar.baz' path notation goodness. I was wondering if it was possible to retain this goodness whilst changing to a different getter/setter naming convention? Instead of 'getFoo()', 'setFoo(x)', I'd like to use 'foo()' and 'foo_$eq(x)' which is the native Scala naming convention. BeanUtils uses Introspector[1] at its heart[2] to discover the properties of a bean - which is based on the java bean spec and tied to the get/set naming convention for methods. So if you want to change this behaviour you would need to start by overriding the getPropertyDescriptors() method in PropertyUtilsBean Niall [1] http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/beans/Introspector.html [2] http://commons.apache.org/beanutils/xref/org/apache/commons/beanutils/PropertyUtilsBean.html#956 Is there some method/interface to override to make this change without impacting everything else? Regards, Richard. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
Re: [BeanUtils] Possible to hook in a different getter/setter naming convention?
Okay, thanks Niall. Will do. Regards, Richard. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-BeanUtils--Possible-to-hook-in-a-different-getter-setter-naming-convention--tp21259922p21284097.html Sent from the Commons - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
