Re: Using native persistence to "extend" memory

2020-06-16 Thread steve.hostettler
Thank you both for clarifying this. I usually also have large objects 3KB so
I thought about increasing the page size to 32KB to reduce the number of
pages and thus reduce the speed at which we get to the 2/3 of dirty pages.
Good idea?
On top of that during the process at some I generate a significant amount of
new objects so I also kept  increased checkpointPageBufferSize to 4GB. I
also writeThrottlingEnabled disabled.

Thanks for advising.



--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/


Re: Using native persistence to "extend" memory

2020-06-16 Thread Denis Magda
Evgeniy,

Thanks for clarifying, I completely forgot about this behavior!

-
Denis


On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 5:10 PM Evgenii Zhuravlev 
wrote:

> Steve,
>
> Actually, disabling WAL is a good option for your use case. Checkpoint
> mechanism is the same with disabled WAL, the only difference is that node
> is not writing WAL to the disk on each operation. Usually, it might make
> sense to disable WAL for initial loading - when you can lose the data in
> case of failure and start data loading again. Four your use case, if you
> don't care about restore, you can just disable it:
> https://www.gridgain.com/docs/latest/developers-guide/persistence/native-persistence#disabling-wal
>
> Best Regards,
> Evgenii
>
>
>
> вт, 16 июн. 2020 г. в 17:02, Denis Magda :
>
>> Steve,
>>
>> Please check these generic recommendations if you haven't done so
>> already:
>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/durable-memory-tuning#native-persistence-related-tuning
>>
>> Otherwise, send us a note if you come across any bottlenecks or issues so
>> that we can give you more specific recommendations.
>>
>> -
>> Denis
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 3:25 PM steve.hostettler <
>> steve.hostett...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks a lot for the recommendation. So keeping the WAL, disabling
>>> archiving.
>>> I understand all records are kept on disk.
>>>
>>> Thanks again. Anything else?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
>>>
>>


Re: Using native persistence to "extend" memory

2020-06-16 Thread Evgenii Zhuravlev
Steve,

Actually, disabling WAL is a good option for your use case. Checkpoint
mechanism is the same with disabled WAL, the only difference is that node
is not writing WAL to the disk on each operation. Usually, it might make
sense to disable WAL for initial loading - when you can lose the data in
case of failure and start data loading again. Four your use case, if you
don't care about restore, you can just disable it:
https://www.gridgain.com/docs/latest/developers-guide/persistence/native-persistence#disabling-wal

Best Regards,
Evgenii



вт, 16 июн. 2020 г. в 17:02, Denis Magda :

> Steve,
>
> Please check these generic recommendations if you haven't done so already:
> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/durable-memory-tuning#native-persistence-related-tuning
>
> Otherwise, send us a note if you come across any bottlenecks or issues so
> that we can give you more specific recommendations.
>
> -
> Denis
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 3:25 PM steve.hostettler <
> steve.hostett...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks a lot for the recommendation. So keeping the WAL, disabling
>> archiving.
>> I understand all records are kept on disk.
>>
>> Thanks again. Anything else?
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
>>
>


Re: Using native persistence to "extend" memory

2020-06-16 Thread Denis Magda
Steve,

Please check these generic recommendations if you haven't done so already:
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/durable-memory-tuning#native-persistence-related-tuning

Otherwise, send us a note if you come across any bottlenecks or issues so
that we can give you more specific recommendations.

-
Denis


On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 3:25 PM steve.hostettler 
wrote:

> Thanks a lot for the recommendation. So keeping the WAL, disabling
> archiving.
> I understand all records are kept on disk.
>
> Thanks again. Anything else?
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
>


Re: Using native persistence to "extend" memory

2020-06-16 Thread steve.hostettler
Thanks a lot for the recommendation. So keeping the WAL, disabling archiving.
I understand all records are kept on disk. 

Thanks again. Anything else?



--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/


Re: Using native persistence to "extend" memory

2020-06-16 Thread Denis Magda
Hi Steve,

I think that you can get a performance hit for your write operations by
disabling the WAL. It serves two purposes in Ignite. The first is the
recovery while the second is fast disk writes. The WAL is an append-only
structure and Ignite can persist changes to disk really quick. If the WAL
is disabled then it will take more time to update persistence files on disk.

Just in case, if you missed that point, once the persistence is enabled
Ignite will keep 100% of records on disk. It's not like a OS swap process
that kicks in only when you're running out of memory space. Usually, we
recommend disabling the WAL during a loading phase:
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/write-ahead-log#section-wal-activation-and-deactivation

In general, I would certainly keep the WAL enabled but disabled the WAL
archiving if the recovery is not a big deal for you:
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/write-ahead-log#disabling-wal-archiving

-
Denis


On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 10:50 AM steve.hostettler <
steve.hostett...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I am trying to use ignite persistence to "extend" memory. That is to
> replace
> the swap that is not working very well.
>
> Therefore since I do not care about recovery I disabled the WAL. Are there
> other things you would recommend to configure to use the ignite persistence
> as a sort of swap. For instance only persisting the less used pages most of
> the time.
>
> Thanks
>
> Steve
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/
>


Using native persistence to "extend" memory

2020-06-16 Thread steve.hostettler
Hello,

I am trying to use ignite persistence to "extend" memory. That is to replace
the swap that is not working very well.

Therefore since I do not care about recovery I disabled the WAL. Are there
other things you would recommend to configure to use the ignite persistence
as a sort of swap. For instance only persisting the less used pages most of
the time.

Thanks

Steve



--
Sent from: http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/